The frigate Admiral Kasatonov reached the final stage of testing

42
The frigate Admiral Kasatonov reached the final stage of testing

The first serial frigate of project 22350 Admiral fleet Kasatonov "is embarking on the final stage of state testing, which will take place in the Baltic Sea. This is reported by the press-service of the shipyard Severnaya Verf".

According to the company, almost all points of the test program have already been completed, all systems and mechanisms are operating normally. The ship will conduct final tests in the Baltic Sea, after which it will return to the Severnaya Verf Shipyard to conduct an audit and prepare for transfer to the Russian Navy. The press service explained that taking into account the state tests, the transfer of the frigate could take place in late May - early June.



It was previously reported that the transfer of the frigate to the Navy was supposed to take place before the end of 2019, then before the end of the first quarter of 2020.

On April 6, 2020, the Northern Fleet press service announced the completion of the next phase of testing the Admiral Kasatonov frigate in the Barents Sea and the beginning of the inter-naval transfer of the ship to the Baltic.

The frigate Admiral Kasatonov is the second ship of the 22350 project and the first serial after the lead frigate Admiral Gorshkov. Displacement of 5 thousand tons with a length of 135 m and a width of 16 m. The frigate is able to travel 4500 miles, while developing a speed of up to 29 knots. Autonomy of navigation is 30 days. The crew is from 170 people.

Main power plant: gas turbine engine with a total capacity of 65 thousand liters. pp., diesel generators with a total capacity of 4 thousand kW.

The frigate is armed with: 130-mm A-192 artillery mount, Poliment-Redoubt anti-aircraft missile system, launchers for 16 anti-ship missiles Onyx or Caliber, anti-submarine complex Package, anti-submarine helicopter Ka-27.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    42 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      April 8 2020 13: 34
      Project 22350 is almost complete, and then the series will go easier. Although of course I want to quickly get the destroyer 22350M.
      MOSCOW, May 9. / TASS /. Russia plans to build 12 upgraded Project 22350M frigates, each of which will carry up to 48 Kalibr, Onyx and Zircon cruise missiles.


      "The lead ship in the series is planned to be delivered to the Navy in 2027," a source in the shipbuilding industry told TASS on Thursday.
      According to him, "by the end of 2019, a technical design should be developed for a ship with a displacement of 7 thousand tons, capable of carrying up to 48 strike missiles" Caliber "," Onyx "and" Zircon "." In total, it is planned to build 12 such frigates, 11 of which will be handed over to the customer within the framework of the new state armament program, "the agency's source said.
      He added that the new frigates will also be equipped with the Poliment-Redut anti-aircraft missile system with up to 100 missiles, anti-submarine and torpedo weapons.

      https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/6415468
      1. +5
        April 8 2020 13: 37
        Our frigates are very similar to destroyers. Correct me if I'm wrong.
        1. +2
          April 8 2020 13: 42
          The re-frigates are underdestructors. They are superior to ships of the "frigate" class, but they do not reach the level of destroyers.
          1. +2
            April 8 2020 13: 51
            I assumed something similar when I wrote this message. Well - let's hope that they will build full-fledged destroyers. Although it is already not bad.
          2. 0
            April 8 2020 14: 16
            Personally, I do not catch up with the Anglo-Saxon classification of ships.
            BOD, patrol ships in fashion began to be classified as frigates.
            If you are interested, compare the displacement and armament of the "Kasatonov" with the western destroyers. I think that there will be no such difference to call this frigate an "underdestructor".
            1. -1
              April 9 2020 05: 02
              The standard displacement of the Gorshkov is 4500 tons. Burke, for example - 7061 tons. Quite a significant difference. I hope ours will at least compensate for this with weapons.
          3. +1
            April 8 2020 14: 31
            And right now, who will understand where the destroyer is and where what, the Dzhapovsky destroyers are aircraft carriers))) as you.
            1. +2
              April 8 2020 14: 38
              And now the classification of ships is generally incomprehensible. It used to be simple: a destroyer - a destroyer - a leader. Next - a light cruiser and so on to the battleship. Simple and clear. Offhand it could be said what approximately weapons each class of ship carries, its displacement and purpose.
              1. 0
                April 8 2020 14: 40
                The leader, after all, was a destroyer, the Germans in Jutland, the leader in general, was KRL
                1. -1
                  April 8 2020 14: 43
                  So the leader is the "destroyer leader". The performance characteristics are higher than a conventional destroyer, but not quite as good as a light cruiser.
                  1. -1
                    April 8 2020 14: 44
                    All TTX leader, from the destroyer, this is the ability to control and guidance.
          4. -1
            April 8 2020 14: 35
            Quote: AS Ivanov.
            Refregates - Nedo-destroyers
            Squadron Frigates!
          5. -1
            April 8 2020 14: 36
            Is the engine already available for destroyers? Or, the body is blinded, and sucks? ??
          6. +1
            April 8 2020 15: 15
            Quote: AU Ivanov.
            The re-frigates are underdestructors. They are superior to ships of the "frigate" class, but they do not reach the level of destroyers.

            Do you also call the British Daring class destroyers the sub-destroyers?
            Displacement "HMS Daring" 7500 tons, a crew of 190 people.


            The world's most advanced British destroyer HMS Daring, built with stealth technology, completed its first trip.

            https://seaspirit.ru/flot/britanskij-esminec-hms-daring.html

            Compare now with what we want.
            "by the end of 2019, a technical design should be developed for a ship with a displacement of 7 tons, capable of carrying up to 48 Kalibr, Onyx and Zircon strike missiles." It is planned to build 12 such frigates in total
      2. -5
        April 8 2020 13: 59
        He added that the new frigates will also be equipped with the Poliment-Redut anti-aircraft missile system with up to 100 missiles.

        If you upgrade pr. 22350, then it is not necessary to increase the air defense system’s ammunition, but definitely put on it the marine version of the S-400. Redut's range is 150 km, what is it? It takes kilometers 250 - 300 minimum.
        1. +1
          April 8 2020 14: 41
          Quote: Connor Macleod
          put on it a marine version of the S-400

          Do you know it? What is the name of it, where is it produced, tested?
          Quote: Connor Macleod
          Redut's range - 150 km

          belay laughing do not read Wikipedia at night
          1. -1
            April 8 2020 14: 45
            Our Vika is all))))
          2. -1
            April 8 2020 14: 48
            Quote: Sandor Clegane
            Do you know it? What is the name of it, where is it produced, tested?

            Since we are talking about the prospects for modernization of pr. 22350, then yes, in the future, maybe the S-400 version will appear ...

            Quote: Sandor Clegane
            do not read Wikipedia at night

            Well, enlighten - what is the range of action of Redoubt?
        2. +2
          April 8 2020 15: 06
          Quote: Connor MacLeod
          He added that the new frigates will also be equipped with the Poliment-Redut anti-aircraft missile system with up to 100 missiles.

          If you upgrade pr. 22350, then it is not necessary to increase the air defense system’s ammunition, but definitely put on it the marine version of the S-400. Redut's range is 150 km, what is it? It takes kilometers 250 - 300 minimum.

          A rocket for Poliment-Redoubt is already being developed based on the technology of the S-400 complex’s missile just 400 km away.
          1. 0
            April 8 2020 15: 11
            It is very good!
        3. +3
          April 8 2020 15: 16
          Are there enough radar capabilities?
          To ensure the use of S-400?
          Or will it be necessary to develop a new RLC, new launchers in the new UKKS for S-400 missiles?
          New BIOS?
          But this will not affect the displacement?
          And if it does, then will not the increase in displacement affect other characteristics? ...
          At a price?
          And how much?
          And in time?

          In the 22350M, the ammunition of the KR and air defense missiles was simply increased, and instead of diesels, a M70FR \ FRU gas turbine with a capacity of 10 - 000 l / s was used instead of diesel engines (instead of 14 l / s AD). which plus its speed on the gearbox with afterburner M000FRU will give on each shaft 5200 90 - 37 500 l \ s.
          This will solve the problem of the lack of maximum speed and ammunition (as well as range and autonomy).
          With everything else, FRIGATE 22350M (that’s how he qualifies) is all right. Changes in the new project are minimal and the industry will be able to begin their construction without unnecessary torment and buildup.

          And if you really want to have S-400 air defense systems on such ships, you will have to sculpt a completely new (at least RLK, UKSK, BIUS and partly line-up) ship. And this is a challenge for the future.
          This could be a destroyer on 4 turbines M90FRU, VI in 12 tons, BC in 000 KR and at least 80 missiles - that is, approximately what was originally proposed in the non-nuclear version of the "Leader". A kind of analogue (in terms of layout and size) to the Chinese 200.
          And now the fleets need DMZ and OZ workhorses.
          1. +3
            April 8 2020 15: 22
            They say that the radar 22350 just can see at a distance of 400 km, so you don’t need to change anything, only a missile is needed. Unfortunately you can’t find the link now. This missile can be used from the UCC, where Caliber and Onyx are.
            The British destroyer with a displacement of 7500 tons is classified as a destroyer, and if you want, it classifies the 22350M with a displacement of 7000 tons as a frigate, although these ships are essentially the same class.
            1. +4
              April 8 2020 16: 13
              And compatibility?
              Let’s marry a rocket \ you S-400 and S-350 RLC ... but PU? It will be necessary to sculpt a new UKKS, and these are other dimensions ...
              No, really. Let it be built as it is - everything has been mastered by industry, tested, tested, and ships of this class are needed yesterday. So this - the upcoming series, let them build on the existing project. 12-18 of these ships are needed on all 3 fleets as soon as possible, and it is better to do freestyle art with increased Wishlist in the next series - in the next modification.
          2. -3
            April 8 2020 16: 57
            Quote: bayard
            And now the fleets need DMZ and OZ workhorses.

            With such an air defense system you won’t work much ...

            Each of these 12-18 frigates can be removed with one Harpoon. With a Harpoon range of 250 km, the enemy’s aircraft will remain far beyond the reach of Redoubt.

            So you need a marine S-400 yesterday ...
            1. +1
              April 8 2020 17: 24
              smile That
              Quote: Connor Macleod
              Each of these 12-18 frigates can be removed with one Harpoon.

              This very "Harpoon" must first overcome the ship's electronic warfare, air defense of the distant (150 km.), middle (60 - 70 km.) and near (2 - 3 km.) zones.
              So hardly one.
              But let's say one overcame.
              And?
              One is definitely not enough - the caliber is not the same. Warhead is small.
              And now the enemy is adopting LRASM weapons. So he has a range of up to 930 km. smile , here and the S-500 will not be enough.
              According to the carrier. smile
              In every good deed (and especially in ships), BALANCE IS NEEDED. And for a frigate (!) SUCH SAM - quite enough.
              The S-400 is needed by the cruiser ... which for some reason are now called "destroyers". Although mines have not been the main weapon of such ships for a long time ... Outlandishness ...

              By the way, not one of the currently operating ships of the Russian Federation (cruiser) can hit a target at such (250-280 km.) Distance.
              Do you want the frigate (!) To surpass the cruiser?
              But due to its compactness, the ammunition load of this air defense system can be much larger than the ammunition load of "Fort" in the same volume. hi
              1. +1
                April 8 2020 17: 29
                Quote: bayard
                This very "Harpoon" must first overcome the ship's electronic warfare, air defense of the distant (150 km.), middle (60 - 70 km.) and near (2 - 3 km.) zones.

                At the altitudes of the "Harpoon" flight, the zone of operation of the ship's air defense begins 25-35 km from the ship - after the anti-ship missile system leaves the radio horizon, its detection, classification and target capture by the ship's air defense system.
                1. +1
                  April 8 2020 19: 40
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  At the altitudes of the "Harpoon" flight, the area of ​​operation of the ship's air defense begins 25-35 km from the ship

                  I'm afraid that even 15 - 17 km for the "Harpoon". , it all depends on the flight altitude. And about three air defense lines, this is me for figurativeness, otherwise a friend thinks that any ship is inferior if it is not capable of hitting a target at a distance of 250 km.
                  I myself am in the past an air defense officer, so I know about the boundaries of detecting low-altitude targets. hi
                  1. +1
                    April 8 2020 19: 46
                    Quote: bayard
                    I'm afraid that even 15 - 17 km for the "Harpoon". , it all depends on the flight altitude.

                    And the height of the antenna post above sea level. smile
                    Quote: bayard
                    I myself am in the past an air defense officer, so I know about the boundaries of detecting low-altitude targets.

                    Well, I pockets with pockets from the military department of the St. Petersburg Polytechnic, which was prepared for the low-altitude S-125. hi
                    1. 0
                      April 8 2020 20: 05
                      Quote: Alexey RA
                      And the height of the antenna post above sea level

                      Exactly !
                      Quote: Alexey RA
                      Well, I’m a spinjack with pockets from the military department of the St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, which was trained for the low-altitude S-125.

                      VVKURE-PVO Vilnius. hi
                      Well, the service in the Caucasus ... operational work (combat control). soldier
            2. 0
              April 8 2020 17: 26
              Quote: Connor Macleod
              With a Harpoon range of 250 km, the enemy’s aircraft will remain far beyond the reach of Redoubt.

              So you need a marine S-400 yesterday ...

              Without a DRLO and ARLGSN on a missile system, you can have at least 1000 km of reach from an air defense system, and the enemy’s aircraft will still remain far beyond the reach of an air defense system.
              For radio horizon + aircraft approach to the launch zone of anti-ship missiles on PMV ("under" the radar's vertical viewing sector).
              And here we are smoothly approaching the beloved topic of aircraft carriers ... smile
          3. +1
            April 10 2020 14: 33
            Greetings Vitaliy! hi
            Quote: bayard
            With everything else, FRIGATE 22350M (that’s how he qualifies) is all right. Changes in the new project are minimal and the industry will be able to begin their construction without unnecessary torment and buildup.

            Looks optimistic, BUT ?!
            If the most developed project 22350 (with VI 5400) still manages to build for 9-10 years and not at least 4-5 ?! So how much will go on the 22350-M ?! 14-15 for each ?!
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            Project 22350 is almost complete, and then the series will go easier. Although of course I want to quickly get the destroyer 22350M.
            I see optimism on the forum belay A real shift, with a decrease in the speed of construction of frigates (even mastered)
            don't see yet recourse
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            MOSCOW, May 9. / TASS /. Russia plans to build 12 upgraded Project 22350M frigates, each of which will carry up to 48 Kalibr, Onyx and Zircon cruise missiles.

            "The lead ship in the series is planned to be delivered to the Navy in 2027, " - a source in the shipbuilding industry said on Thursday to TASS.
            lol belay
            Quote: bayard
            And now the fleets need DMZ and OZ workhorses.
            I agree ! Still as needed. But the speed of their construction ... As if to put it mildly, it is alarming (!). And then in Kerch, on the "Zaliv", they want to lay IMMEDIATELY TWO new (not worked out project (!) ..) UDC ?! ... What do you think, and how many will they build (?!) ... But it would seem ... Or maybe for the time being lay ONE (!!!) ... And in second place, (instead of the second untapped giant in VI 25000) , to lay the frigate 22350.1 for the Black Sea Fleet (like "Chichagov" on 24 UVP UKSK) ?! After all, the ship is more developed project. If the speed of its construction is about 5 years (and not 9-11) !!! will it be more useful for the Black Sea Fleet ?!
            1. 0
              April 10 2020 16: 31
              Greetings Vladimir! hi
              Quote: Vl Nemchinov
              Looks optimistic, BUT ?!
              If the most developed project 22350 (with VI 5400) still manages to build for 9-10 years and not at least 4-5 ?! So how much will go on the 22350-M ?! 14-15 for each ?!

              Everything will show this summer this year - they must install the first fully domestic power plant on frigate 22350. And lower it to the water. If everything goes smoothly and sea trials confirm this, then we can say that the GEM for 22350 was born and the pace of construction of frigates from laying, in the new conditions, will be 5 years, and after the industry is swinging, up to 4 years.
              All the problems with the timing were not due to the hand-handedness of the shipbuilders, but due to the unavailability of the Polyment-Redut air defense system, which had been long awaited. Then, since 2014, there was no power plant. Now the air defense missile system is ready, tested and adopted, and the power plant seems to have gone too ... but only sea trials will confirm this.
              The same thing with the 22350M - there is nothing fundamentally new there - all the on-board equipment, avionics from the already mastered 22350. Only new GEMs (M-70FR \ FRU turbine and gearbox), and an enlarged BC KR and missiles ... Perhaps they will expand the hangar for 2 helicopters (which I would really like).
              Quote: Vl Nemchinov
              Quote: bayard
              And now the fleets need DMZ and OZ workhorses.
              I agree ! Still as needed. But the speed of their construction ... As if to put it mildly, it is alarming (!). And then in Kerch, on the "Zaliv", they want to lay IMMEDIATELY TWO new (not worked out project (!) ..) UDC ?! ... What do you think, how many of them will be built (?!) ... But it would seem ... And maybe for now, ONE (!!!)

              Judging by the announced delivery schedules (namely, delivery, not bookmarks) of new UDCs, although they will be laid at the same time, they will be built as a head with a separation from the sistership at least a year. Apparently, specialized crews of shipbuilders will switch from one ship to another as work progresses, and not drive both hulls simultaneously. Perhaps, they don’t have enough hands. And the experience, the analysis of errors, in the second one will not be repeated, if you work with the lag about a year (as stipulated by the delivery schedule.
              It’s better to order, and perhaps to lay it all at once both (but work with the lag, as I described above). Then the contractors receive orders for many years in advance - metal, aggregates, equipment, etc. accessories, and make their plans with confidence in the future. And then the prices for their products will then be lower - yet it’s not a single instance to drive, whatever it is, but a series ...
              The areas and capacities in Kerch allow you to build several large vessels / ships at the same time.
              If the project is based on the same "Mistral", which has already been built with aft sections, albeit at a different shipyard (which looks like the truth, at least based on their VI declared UDC - 25 - 000 tons), then it will be easier, although what kind of GEM will be used on it while the secret, covered in darkness ...
              Quote: Vl Nemchinov
              ... And in second place, (instead of the second unused giant in VI 25000), to lay the frigate 22350.1 for the Black Sea Fleet (like "Chichagov" on 24 UVP UKSK) ?! After all, the ship is more developed project. If the speed of its construction is about 5 years (and not 9-11) !!! will it be more useful for the Black Sea Fleet ?!

              If both UDCs are laid at once and nothing prevents it (the same virus is crowned), then the solution will still be correct - such ships are needed, and in 4 pieces. at a minimum, and stretching their construction is not worth it. In addition, the Kerch plant should be launched as soon as possible at full capacity, and without such large orders (large orders of large ships) this will not work.
              As for the construction of 22350+ (or 22350.1) in Kerch, in principle this is possible, and even at the same time, because from 4 to 6 large vessels such as a tanker, dry cargo ship, lighter carrier could be built at the same time. But everything should go in order and capacity the plant should still be gradually gaining, in stages and not on different types of ships.
              In addition, the 2 GCCs in the Baltic - Kaliningrad and St. Petersburg, are, in principle, quite enough to drive 22350+ and 22350M even at the same time, especially since they have already mastered this particular type, and only their presence limits their capabilities \ the lack of power plants in the required quantities to ensure the pace at which they are capable. If the turbines and gearboxes do not fail, then the available capacities for their delivery to these two plants will hardly be enough.
              And not the fact that it’s enough for the Kerch Shipyard as well.
              It’s better to separate the specializations — corvettes and frigates in the Baltic, corvettes at the Amur plant (there are another 10 units waiting for order 20380), in Kerch - UDC, of ​​which 2 units. the fleets will not be enough. A minimum of 4 is necessary, and optimally - 6 pcs. Moreover, their price will be approximately like one frigate 22350 (without M).
              It’s not for me to explain to you how any production can run a fever upon receipt of a large but heterogeneous order after a downtime. And so, shipbuilders will get their hands on the first UDC, the next ones will go noticeably more fun - when clear cooperation is established and the process is debugged to automatism, everything turns out fun, fast and efficiently.
              In addition, if the plans of the Ministry of Defense for the construction of aircraft carriers are justified, then they will have to be built in Kerch. In the Big Stone, you can’t even count on it; they won’t be able to disregard the existing orders from Rosneft and Novatek for 15 years. Branch over - asks for the construction of another - two of the same super-shipyard. And having planted a hand on the UDC, the plant (Kerch) will be able to take up aircraft carriers by the middle of the decade.
              And orders, like frigates, will only hinder these plans.
              Kerch should build only the largest ships - it is capable of this with its infrastructure.
              I think so .
              hi drinks
              1. 0
                April 10 2020 23: 13
                Quote: bayard
                Judging by the announced delivery schedules (namely, delivery, not bookmarks) of new UDCs, although they will be laid at the same time, they will be built as a head with a separation from the sistership at least a year
                recourse sometimes your optimism even bribes me, but winked I don’t feel like Pushkin’s, "I'm glad to be deceived myself ..." what
                Quote: bayard
                If both UDCs are laid down at once and nothing prevents it (the same virus is crowned), then the solution will still be correct
                belay No.
                My friend, even the difference is 3-3,5 years between / head / "Gorshkov" and / first serial / "Kasatonov", the displacement of which is not 25000 but in total 5400 T., did not help to avoid (so-called small primary flaws) ... Do you propose to lay down two monsters at once ?! request what Really do not understand why ?!
                Quote: bayard
                And orders, like frigates, will only hinder these plans.
                From what ?! If after 5 years fr. 22350.1 will be launched, it will be possible to lay the second UDC. Just taking into account "project errors"identified during the construction of the first one !! And one thing does not interfere with the other!
                And as for -
                Quote: bayard
                In the Big Stone, you can’t even count on it; they won’t be able to disregard the existing orders from Rosneft and Novatek for 15 years.
                winked so this is bad. There, the pair would not have just prevented - laying the three 22350.1 for 2-3 years. Yes And then looks like a private super shipyard on the money of citizens (budgetary) is played and exhaust towards the Navy - "0" ... ?! negative it is not right No.
                1. 0
                  April 11 2020 03: 50
                  Quote: Vl Nemchinov
                  My friend, even the difference of 3-3,5 years between / head / "Gorshkov" and / the first serial / "Kasatonov", whose displacement is not 25000 but only 5400 tons, did not help to avoid (the so-called small primary defects). .. And you propose to lay two monsters at once ?! I really don't understand why ?!

                  I was also somewhat surprised by the laying (planned) of two UDCs at once, but the fact is that such ships are no longer a novelty for our shipbuilding - the fuss with the Mistrals, when the aft sections were being built in the Baltic and the representatives of the USC controlled their construction in France, for nothing passed. The documentation for them was received and the plans were to build two more such ships already entirely at our shipyards. Immediately after the delivery of the first two by the French.
                  Prepared for this.
                  And the project is most likely just a revised "Mistral", and the displacement hints at this.
                  Apparently they decided not to stretch the pleasure and lay down two hulls at once, because ships are needed. The creation of expeditionary forces of the fleet has been announced, and for this just such expeditionary ships are needed.
                  I do not justify and do not even defend such a decision, I analyze why such decisions have been made. Apparently, on the one hand, it was hot (need), but on the other hand, there is some confidence in success. If the Mistrals were supposed to be received in 2015, then the trktiy and the fourth UDC could have been laid at our shipyards already in 2016, which means they were ready for this already then. So the laying of 2 buildings in 2020 does not look too ... ill-considered. Rather, it raises the question of why this was done with such a delay ... And after all, such questions (why the UDC are not laid) sounded regularly all these years ... Most likely they were going to use first French engines (on licensed), and then they were looking for them and what is a replacement from their manufacturers.
                  But having received such an order, "Zaliv" will hardly be able to pull any more orders at the same time, it would have to digest this one. To be torn between the construction of the UDC and the frigates ... yes, with such a staff shortage ... not-to-pull-chick. In recent times, they have not built anything larger than RTOs.
                  And let frigates be built by Peter and Kerch, they have a technical process debugged there, cooperation. They and the flag in their hands.
                  In the Far East, there is nowhere and no one to build the first ranks of.
                  The Amur plant barely develops 20380 corvettes and is awaiting an order for another 10 such corvettes. God grant that he can handle it.
                  Bolshoy Kamen - the shipyard is still unfinished and is not yet capable of even "screwdriver assembly" of tankers and dry cargo ships. The gas carriers seem to have despaired of waiting for them, and Novatek ordered them in Korea. It’s hard with personnel there, locals don’t go to work - they pay little, housing for employees is just being built ... they are recruiting all over Russia, but locals say that many are unlikely to stay. To go to the ends of the earth in an unsettled life and social environment, and at the same time on a very modest salary ... Under the Soviet Union, young people were lured into such construction projects with a long ruble, and now ... the entire long part of the ruble gets to the effective management man. Therefore, management is effective, but construction is not.

                  feel Well, how does it sound like optimism from an enthusiastic high school girl? smile
                  The Star on the Stone will not build warships. Years 10 - 15 for sure. Until it is completed, the team will not be formed, they will not learn how to build ships. Themselves. They will rake them with their orders ... They will lay three more nuclear super-icebreakers ... I don't even know how they can cope with this. Where do so many qualified people come from ...
                  If we build frigates and destroyers in the Far East, then most likely on the Amur River, where they were built before. But only after the completion of a series of corvettes. And that means not soon.
                  So it’s only necessary to build the first ranks in the Baltic ... maybe even Severodvinsk will someday connect to this.

                  Or another option is to regain Zaporizhzhya, Nikolaev and Odessa regions, revive the Nikolaev shipyards and build on them.
                  But this is hard to believe.
                  Till .
                  ... coronovirus ... bully feel
        4. 0
          April 8 2020 17: 32
          It is not necessary, unnecessarily, manned SLS are at low altitude. Detection is small. You can still place s-400 on the coast and work under their cover.
      3. +2
        April 8 2020 16: 27
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Project 22350 almost mastered

        Not yet. It will be mastered when the frigate with a fully domestic power plant (and not joint production) passes the state.
    2. +4
      April 8 2020 14: 08
      The ship will conduct final tests in the Baltic Sea, after which it will return to the Severnaya Verf shipyard for revision and preparation for transfer to the Russian Navy.

      In my opinion, it used to be called "acceptance tests", when, after determining the degree of potential risks and the threshold of their admissibility, the issue of the expediency of putting this product into production and (or) using it for its intended purpose is decided.
    3. 0
      April 8 2020 14: 17
      Nuuu was born the whole 2nd ship! Fear the adversaries!
      1. +1
        April 8 2020 14: 46
        We give birth is difficult. But anyway .
        1. -1
          April 8 2020 15: 08
          Minusator, arguments to the studio))) pliz
      2. 0
        April 10 2020 14: 41
        Quote: Incompetent
        Nuuu was born the whole 2nd ship! Fear the adversaries!
        good !!! - broke !!! hi laughing +
    4. 0
      April 8 2020 21: 47
      7 feet under the keel, the rest 100 times voiced even when the slipway was

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"