Military Review

“Russia impedes combat power”: Azeridefence on the balance of power in the Caspian

104

The Caspian Sea has become an apple of contention between the states located on its shores. They are forcing the buildup of their military potential in the waters, trying to keep up with their neighbors. The balance of power prevailing here was estimated by the Azerbaijani publication Azeridefence.


Sandbox of Nations and Rockets


According to him, Turkmenistan has two boats 12418 Edermen and Gayratly purchased from the Russian Federation, each of which is equipped with 16 anti-ship missiles X-35 of the Uran-E complex. They are able to destroy a ship with a displacement of up to 5 thousand tons. The range of these missiles is limited to 130 km.

In 2015, Turkmenistan acquired in Italy anti-ship missiles Otomat Mk 2 (distance of destruction of 180 km) and Marte Mk 2 / N (range of more than 30 km). They are equipped with boats of the Turkish NTPB project (they carry 4 or 8 anti-ship missiles respectively). According to some reports, the Marte Mk 2 / N battery is also in service with the coast guard.

Kazakhstan in May 2014 ordered a land-based mobile battery in France with Exocet MM40 Block 3 anti-ship missiles operating at a range of over 180 km [only the 2012 protocol of intent is known; at least deliveries are not reflected anywhere].

The Otomat Mk 2 belonging to the Turkmens in the Caspian basin is considered one of the most modern missiles in the world, designed to destroy surface and coastal targets outside their radius of action.

- notes Azeridefence.

Azerbaijan has purchased a batch of anti-ship missiles Gabriel Mk 5 in Israel, which "has higher characteristics, despite the fact that it has the same dimensions as Exocet missiles." Its flight range is more than 200 km.

Iran has a Camaran corvette in the Caspian [still Jamaran, with 4 anti-ship missiles Noor] and missile-artillery boats of the Sina project [each with 4 anti-ship missiles Noor]. Noor missiles, also armed with coastal units, operate at a distance of 120-150 km. In addition, there are reports in the media that Iran is arming two Peykap high-speed boats with two Nasr-1 anti-ship missiles (30 km distance).

“Russia impedes combat power”: Azeridefence on the balance of power in the Caspian


The potential of Russia


The missile potential of Russia is represented by three missile systems of the Buyan-M project Sviyazhsk, Uglich and Veliky Ustyug and one ship Dagestan of the 11661K type. Each of them carries 8 Caliber-NK missiles. Accurate information on the range of their action is not available. The different range of fire at sea targets was voiced - 375, 500, 1400 km. It has the Navy of the Russian Federation and the patrol guard "Tatarstan" of project 11661 (8 anti-ship missiles X-35U with a range of up to 260 km).

Along with strengthening fleet Russia is deploying Bal-based coastal systems (range up to 260 km).

Missiles fly most of the way at an altitude of 1-2 meters above sea level, and therefore it is difficult to detect and recognize them

- writes the edition.

In the Caspian territories of Russia aviationarmed with new Kh-31A cruise missiles, making the way up to 70 km. It was reported that they were also used by the Kazakh Air Force during the exercises.

How Russia impedes combat power


According to Azeridefence, at the same time, Russia limits the access of other littoral countries to its weapons. So, Azerbaijan’s attempts to acquire the Bal-E coastal missile complex failed: because of the “threat to the ships of the Caspian fleet, and also because of the possibility of using these missiles in Karabakh.” Moscow is in no hurry with the sale of Bal-E to Kazakhstan.

Russia impedes the strengthening of defense capability in the marine segment of other countries of the Caspian Sea

- concludes Azeridefence, noting that "Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan will continue to strengthen their arsenals with the help of more modern French-Italian, Turkish and Israeli missile systems."

It is possible that other alternatives will appear in the future, the Azerbaijani publication points out.

Photos used:
https://azeridefence.com/
104 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Proton
    Proton April 8 2020 12: 31 New
    17
    Some strange ones, first arm, then rake the porridge, if it brews, it’s right that they did not sell yes
    1. Gene84
      Gene84 April 8 2020 12: 42 New
      23
      Indeed, sell them, and then Russia stop the war in Nagorno-Karabakh. No, pipes.
      1. Uncle Izya
        Uncle Izya April 8 2020 13: 57 New
        -7
        Do not sell Russia will sell others the same usa with his snout
        1. aleks26
          aleks26 April 9 2020 13: 13 New
          +2
          Quote: Uncle Izya
          Do not sell Russia will sell others the same usa with his snout

          Well, Russia sells very cheaply, with an installment plan for 100 years, and the Americans will tear 3 skins.
      2. Malyuta
        Malyuta April 9 2020 13: 28 New
        10
        Quote: Gene84
        Indeed, sell them, and then Russia stop the war in Nagorno-Karabakh. No, pipes.

        Today there are two conflicting articles on the site, the first here is about the fact that the Russian Federation is hindering Azerbaijan, and the second is about how the Russian Federation is ready to sell aircraft wassat
        Indeed, I did not understand anything, but it was interesting.
        All the same, "house" arrest strongly affects the psyche, it is time to cancel the coronavirus.
    2. bars1
      bars1 April 8 2020 12: 43 New
      +4
      Well, Russia is arming Armenia and Azerbaijan. So, the other day, Azerbaijanis visited the enterprises of the domestic defense industry, where they make the Su-30SM and MiG-35. On the last even flew.
      1. bayard
        bayard April 8 2020 20: 00 New
        +3
        Azerbaijanis did not watch the Su-30SM, but the Su-35S and MiG-35.
        And it is very good that Azerbaijan still gave the go-ahead for the sale of such weapons. They sent requests a long time and more than once.
        Now that Armenia has received the Su-30SM, and even on credit, it cannot reproach Russia with the sale of military aircraft to Azerbaijan - everything is fair. Moreover, Azerbaijan pays with real money and in full. Yes, for Russia, by and large it is much more interesting to have Azerbaijan as an ally / partner than an unreliable, swivel and poor Armenia.
        I served in Azerbaijan just at the time the conflict started and I know my history (conflict) well. Therefore, I believe that the sale of fighter jets is the right and timely decision. In addition, fighters are multifunctional and flexible weapons, but the coastal complex doesn’t need either Azerbaijan or other CIS partners - this is the sea - an internal body of water and there are enough boats for it. And then you never know how much the gifted wrong button will press ... and we have a whole flotilla there ...
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS April 8 2020 13: 50 New
      +4
      According to Azeridefence, at the same time, Russia limits the access of other littoral countries to its weapons. So, Azerbaijan’s attempts to acquire the Bal-E coastal missile complex failed: because of the “threat to the ships of the Caspian fleet, and also because of the possibility of using these missiles in Karabakh.” Moscow is in no hurry with the sale of Bal-E to Kazakhstan.

      Why arm countries that can wage war on our borders at any moment? This is the United States supplying everyone with its strike systems, so that there are more bonfires of war around the world.
  2. Sidor Amenpodestovich
    Sidor Amenpodestovich April 8 2020 12: 32 New
    -15
    What the hell! The people are on edge, new names are about to appear in politics, the economy is flying in tartarara, the ruble exchange rate! But weapons, from a Soviet backlog, are, however, refused to be sold. Disgrace!
    1. ser56
      ser56 April 8 2020 13: 23 New
      +4
      Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
      economy flies to tara-tarara, ruble exchange rate

      everything is gone chef bully
      1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
        Sidor Amenpodestovich April 8 2020 13: 27 New
        -9
        Without amateur performances!
        U! gone.
        No need to offend the source.
        1. venik
          venik April 8 2020 20: 55 New
          +1
          Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
          U! gone.
          No need to offend the source.

          =======
          No! These words were spoken not by Lelik, but by "Kazladoev":

          The primary sources you need to know! laughing lol
          1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
            Sidor Amenpodestovich April 9 2020 10: 51 New
            0
            Right! Thank you for correcting.
    2. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan April 8 2020 13: 28 New
      +5
      What the hell! The people are on edge, new names are about to appear in politics, the economy is flying in tartarara, the ruble exchange rate! But weapons, from a Soviet backlog, are, however, refused to be sold. Disgrace!


      Stop the tantrum.

      Russia sells weapons as it sees fit. And since we are not selling the Ball to Azerbaijan, then there are some concerns about this.
      1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
        Sidor Amenpodestovich April 8 2020 13: 29 New
        -1
        You do not understand anything. With all due respect.
  3. Voltsky
    Voltsky April 8 2020 12: 33 New
    0
    According to Azeridefence, at the same time, Russia limits the access of other littoral countries to its weapons. So, Azerbaijan’s attempts to acquire the Bal-E coastal missile complex failed: because of the “threat to the ships of the Caspian fleet, and also because of the possibility of using these missiles in Karabakh.” Moscow is in no hurry with the sale of Bal-E to Kazakhstan.


    but you don’t need, you have a big and fat uncle hanging out in the form of an arbiter; if you want to nightmare each other, go ahead with the song but buy from others so that you couldn’t show anything to your uncle.
    1. Azdefence
      Azdefence April 8 2020 12: 38 New
      0
      Quote: Voletsky
      if you want to have fun with each other, go ahead and with the song but buy from others,

      That's it. What is the problem then I do not understand. The news headline is somehow left.
      1. Ratmir_Ryazan
        Ratmir_Ryazan April 8 2020 13: 30 New
        +3
        So this news is from the Azerbaijani media. Indeed, what is the problem, Russia does not sell, buy somewhere else.
        1. vlad106
          vlad106 April 8 2020 15: 36 New
          0
          Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
          So this news is from the Azerbaijani media. Indeed, what is the problem, Russia does not sell, buy somewhere else.


          Well, buy from Ezrail. why good?
          1. Ratmir_Ryazan
            Ratmir_Ryazan April 8 2020 16: 43 New
            0
            I do not have all the information to answer why Russia does not sell the Ball to Azerbaijan, but I think there are reasons for this.
            1. Butchcassidy
              Butchcassidy April 8 2020 17: 23 New
              +1
              Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
              I do not have all the information to answer why Russia does not sell the Ball to Azerbaijan, but I think there are reasons for this.

              The ball can be used on ground facilities, the experience of Hmeimim in Syria confirms this.
  4. cherkas.oe
    cherkas.oe April 8 2020 12: 34 New
    0
    Matches are not a toy for children, but rockets even more so. They are not needed by fragile minds, you will grow up and understand that it is better to negotiate than rattle rattles in front of each other.
    1. KARAKURT15
      KARAKURT15 April 8 2020 13: 39 New
      -8
      Itself would grow up, and that you carry nonsense!
      1. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe April 8 2020 14: 02 New
        0
        Quote: KARAKURT15
        Itself would grow up, and that you carry nonsense!

        Insect, I didn’t catch flies with you and I don’t need to poke.
        1. KARAKURT15
          KARAKURT15 April 10 2020 09: 44 New
          +2
          I do not catch flies, I crush them. The insect itself, because the insect originated from the insect.
    2. vlad106
      vlad106 April 8 2020 16: 11 New
      -3
      Quote: cherkas.oe
      Matches are not a toy for children, but rockets even more so. They are not needed by fragile minds, you will grow up and understand that it is better to negotiate than rattle rattles in front of each other.


      just the head of the foreign ministry, Lavrov, whose real name is Kalantaryan, is afraid that these so-called "matches" in the presence of the Azerbaijani army in the form of Bala-E will turn out to be a very frightening factor for the morale of his fellow Yerevan residents.
      God forbid, Baku will get a BAL, not far from diarrhea
      1. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe April 8 2020 16: 30 New
        -1
        Quote: vlad106
        Lavrov, whose real last name is Kalantaryan

        With your logic, apparently everything is not simple, but easier to say; - "there is an elder in the garden and there is an uncle in Kiev." Where did you see Armenia on the Caspian Sea, dear and what does the "Ball" anti-ship missile system have to do with it? Ponder at your leisure, you may be able to draw acceptable conclusions. hi
  5. Olgovich
    Olgovich April 8 2020 12: 35 New
    +3
    The Caspian Sea has become an apple of contention between the states located on its shores. They are forcing the buildup of their military potential in the waters, trying to keep up with their neighbors. The balance of power prevailing here was estimated by the Azerbaijani publication Azeridefence.

    Sandbox of Nations and rockets


    Hmm ...

    And just 103 years ago there was only Russia and Iran, whose north. again. was. actually. Russian.....
    1. ser56
      ser56 April 8 2020 13: 25 New
      +3
      Quote: Olgovich
      And just 103 years ago there

      legacy of bolshevism ... request but modern red is not enough, they whine about the achievements of the USSR and want to further ruin Russia ...
      1. meandr51
        meandr51 April 9 2020 13: 05 New
        -2
        Who is this, Zyuganov wants to destroy Russia? And I thought he wanted to restore it to the size of the USSR ... Or do you consider someone in the government "red" who destroyed the Soviet industry and now indifferently watches the "closure" of the regions?
        1. ser56
          ser56 April 9 2020 14: 08 New
          0
          Quote: meandr51
          Who does Zyuganov want to ruin Russia?

          Yes, his (or rather the Communist Party, he himself has long been bourgeois) slogans can lead to another GV ...
          Quote: meandr51
          And I thought he wanted to restore it to the size of the USSR ..

          do you know him Or did he say his Wishlist? hi USSR is a story ...
          Quote: meandr51
          who ruined Soviet industry

          immigrants from the Central Committee of the CPSU ruined it - learn modern history ...

          Quote: meandr51
          is now indifferently watching the "closure" of the regions?

          And what's wrong with that ? If the center is foolish about this issue - there is no quarantine in only one city - it is necessary to establish barriers between regions too!
    2. PSih2097
      PSih2097 April 8 2020 13: 37 New
      +1
      Quote: Olgovich
      And only 103 years ago there was only Russia and Iran, whose north. again. was. actually. Russian .....

      80 years ago it was also ...
    3. Oquzyurd
      Oquzyurd April 8 2020 18: 12 New
      -3
      For you, the depth of history is apparently limited to 103 years. But you weren’t there and we were there, you were there for a thousand years and you weren’t there. we ruled us, fought, lost, won, but lived without your arrogant favor, we were 19 years ago, you think. Well, so what? Understand at last, you are not the navel of the earth, people can live up to you, live with you, and without you too.
      1. Moss
        Moss April 8 2020 20: 04 New
        +1
        Yes, we are not a navel, yes we were not, but now there is this you will reckon with, whether you want it or not ...
      2. Olgovich
        Olgovich April 8 2020 20: 58 New
        -5
        Quote: Oquzyurd
        Understand at last, you are not the navel of the earth, people can live up to you, live with you, and without you too.


        Chop on your forehead:you are not a navel land, we can live up to you, live with you, and without you too.
        1. Oquzyurd
          Oquzyurd April 8 2020 21: 24 New
          -1
          We did not claim to be the navel of the earth. Otherwise, you are closer to the truth, which I wanted to convey.
          But all the same, you have not knocked your arrogance out of yourself. A simple example: I will "Understand at last", and you will "hack me on the forehead." In the first case, not to offend or humiliate, that is, recognition of equality, and in the second, to command menacingly, initially considering himself an excellent creature. Now see the difference?
          1. smile
            smile April 9 2020 01: 42 New
            +3
            Oquzyurd
            Hello.
            This Turkey did not claim the title of "Navel of the Earth" :)))
            Respected. I understand that you want to embellish yourself ... but, damn it, still take the measure - the Ottomans were quite active, quite aggressive and quite combat-ready to capture a third of Europe, undermine the power of a truly millennial Persia, and invade the Caucasus. This was one of the most aggressive states for four hundred years ..... The planet should also thank Timur Lengu for invading the Ottomans and laying the pyramids out of the heads of future conquerors, halting the development of the Ottoman plague for half a century - well. until they recovered from a monstrous defeat ....
            Yes, various khanates of Azerbaijan. Understanding WHAT the Turkish conquerors are going to turn them into - not only that. that for some time they stopped cutting themselves - at the end of the 17th - beginning of the 18th centuries, among themselves - and even united with the Armenian state, and even with some Georgian principalities - in order to give a joint rebuff to the Turkish enslavers.
            Success was successful for all of you at one time ... the Turks suffered a series of defeats ..... but, given that the Russians then could only help you and your Armenian cries for help (we had no strength then, but there were other wars , and the population of the Ottoman Empire and the resources of the Ottoman Empire seized by the Turks far exceeded ours) - the Turks still transferred you over time. For a century.
            Some of the nobility in Azerbaijan in some khanates was purchased, and they did not consider themselves a single state - it would never have happened. if in the initial stage of the creation of the USSR an unreasonable decision on the creation of a never-existing state — the Azerbaijan SSR — were made.
            And the population of most of these always gnawing khanates did not call themselves Azerbaijanis .... :)))) And you know this very well ... :)))) Can you say - why are you silent? :)))))
            It was the bad Russians who finally saved you (but more Georgians and Armenians - you were more assimilated and subjugated than them) from destruction and existence as a colony of the already backward wild semi-feudal state - Turkey.
            And tales of millennia are still understandable in the mouths of Armenians - this is so .... but from you .... :))) Damn. then the Persians fought you. then the Turks slapped the Persians, and they began to tear you instead of them ... yeah. and you such figures then ranked themselves among the Persians, then among the Turks ... even when Apollo was alive - one of your ... stupid colleagues. told that the true name of the united people "Azerbaijanis" - Albanians .... just sur! :)))) I still don’t understand, why is it just a shame to be an Azerbaijani? Should you be either a henchman of the Persians or the Turks, and nothing else? :))))
            Okay, I won’t tyrannize you further .... but I would like your mind to wake up and at least some kind of pride .....
            But in general - a sad story - about the situation ... :))) Do not you? :)))))
            Goodbye. Good luck.
            1. Oquzyurd
              Oquzyurd April 9 2020 02: 48 New
              -4
              You got such a mess. They drew everything and everything. Here you need to answer every fad, but you get a very long text. I'll try as short as possible.
              "It was Turkey that did not claim to be the" Navel of the Earth ":)))" Here we were talking about Azerbaijan, and why did you drag Turkey along?
              "if at the initial stage of the creation of the USSR an unreasonable decision to create a state that never existed - the Azerbaijan SSR, had not been made." Duc, and the USSR never existed, but we created the same. And, we had statehood in the Caucasus for a long time, and many times. Azerbaijan is the last of them, which was created by the Turks on these edges.
              "And the population of most of these eternally gnawing khanates did not call themselves Azerbaijanis .... :)))) And you know that very well ... :)))) Can you say why you are silent? :)))))" In general then we are not silent. An Azerbaijani (Azerbaijan-Azerbaijan, for example, as Russia-Russian) is a community by the name of the territory, not an ethnos. For the first time, in 1936, Stalin turned a community (Azerbaijanian, in the analogue of the word -Russian) into a nationality, writing it is on the column of nationality. Until 1936, (passports of that time were preserved) in Azerbaijan, the ethnicity of a person was indicated on the passport, for example, ..... The column of nationality of a certain Mamedov G.G. --- Turk.
              Under tsarist Russia, we Azerbaijanis were called Caucasian Türks, Caucasian Tatars.
              But the important thing is not what we are called from the edge, but who we really are. Azerbaijan is a lot of ethnic country, and each of us knows that I am Lezgin, Talysh, Turk, Kurd, Jew, etc. It so happened in history that most of them are of Turkic ethnicity. Therefore, it was no coincidence that Stalin decided to take such a step as to estrange us from the Turkish Türks, calling us, recording us as an Azerbaijani. But there is a silver lining, because the common ethnic groups around the idea of ​​Azerbaijan has played a unifying factor within the country.
              I didn’t answer everything, because TMA is long. But, if there is a specific question, I can answer.
              1. smile
                smile April 9 2020 03: 12 New
                +4
                Oquzyurd
                You know, I liked your answer. No kidding.
                I answer:
                1. Porridge - yes, indeed, porridge - since I was not sure that you were not Turks - given how many comments you wrote in support of Turkish weapons ... still beaten (so far) in Syria :)))). If I knew for sure. that you are from Azerbaijan. and I didn’t suspect it - my comment would be slimmer and more focused. So, I apologize - hit the squares. :)))
                2. I am surprised that you did not argue with my interpretation of the creation of Azerbaijan - six years ago your colleagues were more uncompromising and did not intend to adhere to historical realities ... unlike you.
                3. Sorry. but I still didn’t understand the answer to the main question - if you don’t want to — don’t answer — why didn’t Azerbaijan become self-sufficient - or rather, your elite, which draws an ideology for its population? Why, for example, at my university back in 88 was your compatriot. and he asked him to be called Iranian .... then some of yours told me personally - yes we are not Azerbaijanis - we are at all Turks .... damn it, you see - it’s strange ..... but reckoning. that in order to enslave the Azerbaijani khanates, the Ottomans really had to make very serious efforts with a sea of ​​blood on both sides - I completely do not understand the position of some Azerbaijani Turkoman ....
                Yes. I understand. that the Armenians resisted the most - less - various Georgian principalities - but you also washed your face with blood and managed to wash the Turks with it ..... damn it. the same thing as those brought up from the captured children of the killed opponents did the janissaries - brainless drugged weapons against their own compatriots .... if the janissaries. Having matured, they realized that serving the murderers of their people and their relatives - this bestiality - there wouldn’t be Turkey .... but the trouble is that the Turks very successfully washed their heads to their victims ....
                What do you think - you are to these victims. Do not accidentally relate? You remember. what did the Turks do with your compatriots in enslavement?
                1. Oquzyurd
                  Oquzyurd April 9 2020 03: 52 New
                  -3
                  1. "How many comments have you written in support of Turkish weapons" I am a Turk (Azerbaijanian), I have a common language, traditions, music, religion, etc. with them.
                  Yes, there weren’t good moments with them, they even fought. Our Shah Ismail fought with Sultan Yavuz and lost. But, even in one house, relatives are fighting, they are fighting each other. The main thing is that they do not forget that they are relatives))
                  2. "I'm surprised you didn't argue" States are created, disintegrated, re-created, even under a different name, name. But, basically, they are created by the same people, or rather ancestors and descendants. This is the same story, there is nothing to be surprised at.
                  3. You scribbled a lot about Osman, Janissary ....
                  I want to note that since 1923 there is another country there, secular, not convenient for neighbors (neighbors live by the criteria and attitudes towards the Ottomans) but much more democratic, trade-union, creating more rights for its citizens than our post-Soviet space.
                  In this regard, Azerbaijan is before them, like cancer before China, and not only to Azerbaijan, by the way.
                  Bad and non-human can be found in any country, just as good. It depends on what we are looking for, what we want to see.
            2. KURT330
              KURT330 April 10 2020 13: 13 New
              0
              Do not tell tales.
          2. Olgovich
            Olgovich April 9 2020 06: 55 New
            -4
            Quote: Oquzyurd
            We did not claim to be the navel of the earth

            belay lolPoor, but noble, crystal-clear, white-furry, honest, but offended by all. Right?lol
            Quote: Oquzyurd
            . Otherwise, you are closer to the truth, which I wanted to convey.

            your rating is "very important" lol
            Quote: Oquzyurd
            But all the same, you have not knocked your arrogance out of yourself. A simple example: I will "Understand at last" for you, and you will "hack me on the forehead"

            This is an example of the fact that you have BYADA with the Russian language: you, being unaware of this, are rude, but here they offer you to remember something.
            Quote: Oquzyurd
            In the first case, do not offend, do not humiliate, that is, the recognition of equality, not in a snap, but in the second, menacingly command, initially considering himself superiorcreation

            1. "threatening to command" lol laughing- study "Tdictionary of the Russian language,
            2. It says the complex.


            Quote: Oquzyurd
            Now see the difference?

            Nope request lol
            1. Oquzyurd
              Oquzyurd April 9 2020 13: 02 New
              0
              "Poor but noble, crystal-clear, white-fluffy, honest, but offended by everyone. Right?" Not poor, noble and honest. The absence of malice against others is not called - everyone is offended.
              "your rating is" very important "" This is not an assessment, but a statement.
              "This is an example of the fact that with the Russian language you-BYADA" "study the" Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language, "
              Byada-not byada, "Hack on the forehead" initially carries the rudeness of the speaker, characterizing a tense state. After all, there are alternative words in Russian, more cultural, less tense.
              And, do you perfectly speak a second and third language?
              Quote: Olgovich
              Nope

              I honestly did not really hope
              1. Olgovich
                Olgovich April 9 2020 13: 27 New
                -3
                Quote: Oquzyurd
                , noble and honest. Lack of malicious intent against others

                Those. I'm right: knights without fear and sweat!
                It's funny!lol
                Quote: Oquzyurd
                This is not an assessment, but statement.

                Who gave you such rights? belay lol
                Quote: Oquzyurd
                Byada-not byada, "Hack on the forehead" initially carries the rudeness of the speaker in itself, characterizing the tense state

                Do not carry nonsense, dunno lol
                Quote: Oquzyurd
                . Indeed, there are alternative words in Russian, more cultural, less intense.

                No
                Quote: Oquzyurd
                And, do you perfectly speak a second and third language?

                No. But I do not try to use my imperfect knowledge to judge the shades and meanings of words in them
                Quote: Oquzyurd
                I honestly did not really hope

                lol


                good luck! yes
      3. meandr51
        meandr51 April 9 2020 13: 07 New
        -1
        That's it. We can live where we create the opportunity for this. Everything depends on us ...
  6. svp67
    svp67 April 8 2020 12: 35 New
    +8
    Russia impedes the strengthening of defense capability in the marine segment of other countries of the Caspian Sea
    - concludes Azeridefence, noting that "Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan will continue to strengthen their arsenals with the help of more modern French-Italian, Turkish and Israeli missile systems."
    Twice an illogical statement, if Russia impedes, then how are these countries arming themselves? And yet, the author asked himself a question, but how much does Russia need, is this arms race there?
  7. Labrador
    Labrador April 8 2020 12: 36 New
    -3
    Or maybe the keys to the apartment, where the money is?
    Funny by golly!
    Well, look, maybe someone else will sell it.
  8. Azdefence
    Azdefence April 8 2020 12: 36 New
    0
    I did not understand what the header of the header was.
    Russia will not sell, another country will sell. It is painful on this issue many want to sell weapons.
    1. Voltsky
      Voltsky April 8 2020 12: 41 New
      -7
      Quote: AzDefence
      I did not understand what the header of the header was.
      Russia will not sell, another country will sell. It is painful on this issue many want to sell weapons.

      they want to be their beloved wife, while leaving the Turks with others.
    2. KARAKURT15
      KARAKURT15 April 8 2020 13: 44 New
      -14
      Duc on oil the same situation was laughing Now they give this oil wink
      They didn’t want us to sell airplanes ... And suddenly! Pinched in fact)) Soon Poplars will begin to sell))
  9. Cowbra
    Cowbra April 8 2020 12: 53 New
    -1
    Sell ​​them a ball. Go ahead with a kiss - they will sell you a mock-up of anti-ship missiles, just like a mock defense to the Saudis. Almost like a real one, even better - from homna and branches!
    1. Uncle Izya
      Uncle Izya April 8 2020 13: 59 New
      +1
      So they will go, but then it will be possible to get to Armenia from the territory of Iran
  10. dzvero
    dzvero April 8 2020 12: 54 New
    +5
    I didn’t understand if there was a schemer out there or local people are unhappy with the price of Western systems and blame Russia on Europe?
  11. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA April 8 2020 13: 07 New
    +2
    Are the Termites mentioned in Table P-15 still alive?
    1. Eugene-Eugene
      April 8 2020 14: 45 New
      -1
      Yes, the Molniya flotilla is still in service.
  12. grandfather_Kostya
    grandfather_Kostya April 8 2020 13: 31 New
    +1
    Why bother cheating on each other in the inland sea?
  13. Free wind
    Free wind April 8 2020 13: 38 New
    +8
    Turkmens on the Caspian coast are very sad, there is a lifeless desert, no villages, no water or saxauls, three villages, two of them called ports. It seems like nobody there is not particularly threatening anyone. It would be better to restore the fish stock. Iran drowns poacher boats together with poachers. Engaged in the cultivation of fish juveniles. Uncle said, in the late seventies, they returned to Astrakhan from Baku. They stumbled into the sea, on a huge field of dead fish. Most likely the warriors fired, and, well, the feeding herd was outfitted. Give the trunks, because it’s sure to begin to twist someone, you need to shoot.
  14. KARAKURT15
    KARAKURT15 April 8 2020 13: 41 New
    -12
    Quote: Olgovich
    The Caspian Sea has become an apple of contention between the states located on its shores. They are forcing the buildup of their military potential in the waters, trying to keep up with their neighbors. The balance of power prevailing here was estimated by the Azerbaijani publication Azeridefence.

    Sandbox of Nations and rockets


    Hmm ...

    And just 103 years ago there was only Russia and Iran, whose north. again. was. actually. Russian.....

    And just 200 years ago around the perimeter of the Khazar (the only correct name for the Caspian) was Turan wink
    1. smile
      smile April 9 2020 01: 58 New
      +2
      KARAKURT15
      Hello.
      Do you know why you got minus signs? Yes, for too impudent lies. The thing called "Great Turan" is an unbridled fantasy and a damp dream of an overly aggressive country that has long since slipped into the third world.
      She never was, and, naturally - never will be. And you know this very well.
      Personally, I don’t understand why you are lying so openly .... You yourself are discrediting yourself ... if someone will listen to you after such a demonstrative lie, huh?
      Or do you have such lies? :))))
      Well, so, measure the degree of awareness of the audience - here the people are literate. :))))
      I can not wish good luck in your endeavor.
      But I wish you health.
      Goodbye.
    2. Butchcassidy
      Butchcassidy April 9 2020 12: 18 New
      -1
      What is Turan in the 1820s?
  15. Lekxnumx
    Lekxnumx April 8 2020 13: 49 New
    +3
    Russia prevents from its interests what is normal. Natural inference on a natural phenomenon, what to discuss? More or less, there is no one to oppose the competition of the Russian Federation in the Caspian Sea, the Azerbaijani Navy needs to develop from a future perspective. And while the emphasis is on the Air Force, air defense is not fanatical because it’s not so bad. The teachings of the doctrine and again the doctrine of the conflict will be resolved on the ground and will be solved artillerymen and infantry the rest is lyrics. I like the MO policy in recent years. At first they bought everything that you can get, then only the most modern and new And now they conduct large-scale exercises every year. Aggressively acts on the whole front, the Armenians last days switched to our border guards, or maybe the border guards themselves to them. Do not hesitate to capture new posts, bring the posts closer to the minimum distance keep the Armenians in good shape. But for every fire you need to respond with fire superior from all caliber. Aliyev is the damn dove of peace (Armenians should be grateful to him), but he also has nerves. And all you need to do is give carte blanche to the military and step aside, politician get involved in politics and seek neutrality of the Russian Federation. And let the military do their job, all of this will come at a great price, but Armenia has no chance in a long-term war. The military-industrial complex of Azerbaijan works nicely and provides everyone with the necessities, it is necessary to stock up on raw materials for the production of weapons. It will not take part in the war on the side of the Armenians of the Russian Federation, but even Russia will get tired of writing out credit It’s on an endless stream of ammunition. The Armenians are not in a position to provide for themselves. In 90 billionth aid to Armenia, Russia did the first: because the warehouses were full the second: because she didn’t know which vector Azerbaijan would turn. Today, Azerbaijan is independent and the Russians have learned to count money. If you didn’t sell anything to Az-well, now they sell a lot.
    1. Aag
      Aag April 8 2020 14: 53 New
      +2
      "... the most advanced missiles in the world, designed to engage surface and coastal targets beyond their range."
      How's that?
      1. Butchcassidy
        Butchcassidy April 8 2020 17: 29 New
        -1
        Quote: AAG
        "... the most advanced missiles in the world, designed to engage surface and coastal targets beyond their range."
        How's that?

        At first I was also embarrassed, but I think that it means that the anti-ship missile has a range of destruction greater than the ship that it can hit.
        1. Aag
          Aag April 9 2020 17: 57 New
          0
          And so I suggested. But, you see, it sounds clumsy.
          1. Butchcassidy
            Butchcassidy April 9 2020 19: 41 New
            0
            Sure. Even very clumsy.
    2. Butchcassidy
      Butchcassidy April 8 2020 17: 21 New
      +2
      Armenia, of course, is still a sea power, if you do not recall the past - I mean Cilicia.

      But now, what side? I mean the alignment of forces in the Caspian.
      1. Lekxnumx
        Lekxnumx April 8 2020 17: 25 New
        +1
        Quote: ButchCassidy
        Armenia, of course, is still a sea power, if you do not recall the past - I mean Cilicia.

        But now, what side? I mean the alignment of forces in the Caspian.

        Armenia has nothing to do with it, that's why I wrote to develop the Navy in the future
        1. Butchcassidy
          Butchcassidy April 8 2020 17: 27 New
          0
          Quote: Lek3338
          Armenia has nothing to do with it, that's why I wrote to develop the Navy in the future

          That's why I asked that you have half the message about the Armenians written, although if my memory serves me, Armenia (even taking into account Nagorno-Karabakh) has no access to the sea.

          And Bal-E is understandable why they will not sell it; it can work on ground targets.
          1. Lekxnumx
            Lekxnumx April 8 2020 17: 30 New
            +2
            There is simply nothing to write on the topic)) But seriously, everything comes from the first proposal of the Navy to develop in the future. And the emphasis is on preparing the military-industrial complex for a long war. Unlike the patriot cheers, I think the war will be a long, difficult, high price but victorious. One day wars are hundreds of wagons of ammunition, one day of modern warfare
            1. Butchcassidy
              Butchcassidy April 8 2020 17: 31 New
              -1
              Quote: Lek3338
              There is simply nothing to write on the topic)) But seriously, everything comes from the first proposal of the Navy to develop in the future. And the emphasis is on preparing the military-industrial complex for a long war. Unlike the patriot cheers, I think the war will be a long, difficult, high price but victorious. One day wars are hundreds of wagons of ammunition, one day of modern warfare

              Are you talking about Karabakh or the Caspian?
              1. Lekxnumx
                Lekxnumx April 8 2020 17: 32 New
                +1
                About Karabakh
                1. Butchcassidy
                  Butchcassidy April 8 2020 20: 08 New
                  0
                  If we talk about Karabakh, then the current offensive potential of Baku is sufficient to inflict serious damage on the Defense Army N.K., R., but clearly insufficient to defeat them and "hack" the defense, primarily the engineering fortifications.

                  If you reason seriously and objectively, then a lot of factors will contribute to this, including a purely internal one: how ready are the Armed Forces? R. to fight on foreign territory, just as unprepared to fight on their own. And the number of wagons of available ammunition will not play a key role in this matter. During the Karabakh war in Az. R. had 11 thousand wagons of ammunition. But they, like overwhelming superiority in all other indicators, did not allow Baku to solve the task.
                  1. Lekxnumx
                    Lekxnumx April 9 2020 20: 44 New
                    +1
                    Quote: ButchCassidy
                    If we talk about Karabakh, then the current offensive potential of Baku is enough to cause serious damage to the Defense Army N.K., R.

                    No NKR army exists in nature! Firstly, the NKR does not have its own military-industrial complex to provide this very "fake" army even with ammunition. The NKR has no opportunity to acquire it abroad because it is not recognized by anyone, the so-called military-industrial complex does not have foreign sponsors such as the SSA. Secondly, there is an Armenian army in positions like this The so-called NKR are soldiers of Armenia. And the so-called NKR is supplied by Armenia.
                    Quote: ButchCassidy
                    but clearly not enough to crush them and "hack" the defense, primarily the engineering fortifications.

                    The defense of the Armenian army was hacked in fact, in several sections by the special forces of the Ministry of Defense and one division. The defense was broken and the special forces deep in the rear also entered our point.
                    Quote: ButchCassidy
                    If you reason seriously and objectively, then a lot of factors will contribute to this, including a purely internal one: how ready are the Armed Forces? R. to fight on foreign territory, just as unprepared to fight on their own.

                    Stupidity! First, even the Armenians do not consider the buffer zone (occupied) their land at the official level. Why is there a passage about the war "on a foreign land"? What are the Azerbaijani Armed Forces ready for they show every day. If you believe your Defense Ministry, then every day ours commit sabotage , shelling somehow does not agree with your opinion. Every month dozens of dead Armenian officers and soldiers
                    Quote: ButchCassidy
                    there were 11 thousand wagons of ammunition. But they, like overwhelming superiority in all other indicators, did not allow Baku to solve the task.
                    When you talk about 11 cars of the USSR that it is miserable, remember how many were redirected from the Russian Federation to Armenia during the war, the express worked without stopping
                    1. Butchcassidy
                      Butchcassidy April 9 2020 20: 54 New
                      -2
                      No NKR army exists in nature! Firstly, the NKR does not have its own military-industrial complex to provide this very "fake" army even with ammunition. The NKR has no opportunity to acquire it abroad because it is not recognized by anyone, the so-called military-industrial complex does not have foreign sponsors such as the SSA. Secondly, there is an Armenian army in positions like this the so-called NKR are soldiers of Armenia. And the so-called NKR is supplied by Armenia

                      Well, why do you say that? It is a known fact that there are weapons factories there. Moreover, in Armenia, the only country in the region has its own production of cartridges due to objective circumstances. The fact that the RA Armed Forces and the NKR Defense Army are closely integrated is also a well-known fact. Armenia is the guarantor of the NKR security. Nobody is hiding this either. But this is still not the same thing. Even the forms of government in both Armenian states are different: RA is the premier republic, and NKR is the presidential one. And in Stepanakert they said that there would be no form of government for me. I'm not saying that most of the Karabakh war, Stepanakert fought completely independently, having no communication with Armenia. These are all known facts. Nobody hides them.
                      1. Lekxnumx
                        Lekxnumx April 9 2020 21: 11 New
                        +1
                        Quote: ButchCassidy
                        It’s a known fact that there are weapons factories

                        For example, I became seriously interested
                        Quote: ButchCassidy
                        Moreover, in Armenia, the only country in the region has its own production of cartridges due to objective circumstances

                        Not only Azerbaijan has been producing 5,45 mm 7,62 mm, 12,7 mm, 14,5 mm, 23 mm and 30 mm since 2013. Even more I will say in series all the calibers of mortars and missiles and air bombs. A lot of things! ButchCassidy I ask now not before that, after the shift I bought vodka, pickled cucumbers and talk with one lady. Quarantine is all closed everywhere, I can go outside (pass) she doesn’t, so we drink remotely))) .Muzhik now I have no time for war, I swear. I will answer later
                      2. Butchcassidy
                        Butchcassidy April 9 2020 21: 21 New
                        0
                        Man now I’m not before the war, I swear. Later I will answer

                        Welcome)) have a good time
                      3. Lekxnumx
                        Lekxnumx April 9 2020 21: 29 New
                        +1
                        And to you the same. Thank you tomorrow at work (night shift) I will file and unsubscribe. The maximum after tomorrow after the dump. Good Friday))
                      4. Butchcassidy
                        Butchcassidy April 10 2020 14: 29 New
                        0
                        Quote: Lek3338
                        And to you the same. Thank you tomorrow at work (night shift) I will file and unsubscribe. The maximum after tomorrow after the dump. Good Friday))

                        We honor and respect the working person))
              2. Butchcassidy
                Butchcassidy April 9 2020 21: 03 New
                -2
                The defense of the Armenian army was hacked in fact, in several sections by the special forces of the Ministry of Defense and one division. The defense was broken and the special forces deep in the rear also entered us

                Man, you're kind of sane. How deep is the rear? What are you talking about? The border village was bombed, the old people were killed (yes, "heroism" is to kill the 92-year-old grandmother and grandfathers and mock their corpses), occupied certain heights. Are you not aware that these were diversionary maneuvers, the main blow - in the Aghdam direction - was thwarted by a massive artillery strike? What are you talking about, buddy? Defense Minister Az threatened to raze Stepanakert to the ground. R. so what? I do not condemn your patriotism, although we have already discussed this topic. And I gave you the facts that after losing the war, Baku won anyway, changing the ethnic balance and de facto subjecting the Lezgins, Avars and Talysh to genocide. But you don't need to fantasize. The Armenians missed the concentration of enemy forces on the border, but there is no talk of any kind of breaking into the defense or even at least some kind of success. At least on the grounds that they opposed the DRG and the special forces of Az. R. conscripts.
              3. Butchcassidy
                Butchcassidy April 9 2020 21: 08 New
                -2
                Stupidity! First, even the Armenians do not consider the buffer zone (occupied) their land at the official level. Why is there a passage about the war "on a foreign land"? What are the Azerbaijani Armed Forces ready for they show every day. If you believe your Defense Ministry, then every day ours commit sabotage , shelling somehow does not agree with your opinion. Every month dozens of dead Armenian officers and soldiers

                Man, who told you that? According to Art. 142 of the NKR Constitution, until the integrity of the state territory of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is restored and borders are clarified, public power is exercised in the territory actually under the jurisdiction of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. This means that the NKR claims at least the Shaumyan district, part of which is occupied by Az. R.
                www.president.nkr.am/ru/nkr/generalInformation/

                My passage describes the actual situation. While volunteers from outside the NKR border territories began to reach the border, buses with volunteers also traveled from Armenia. And what at that time was on the territory of Az. R.? Caravans of people from border villages stretched toward Baku. You do not advertise it and it is logical. But it was. In social networks people write about this, including in Russian.
              4. Butchcassidy
                Butchcassidy April 9 2020 21: 17 New
                -2
                When you talk about 11 cars of the USSR that it is miserable, remember how many were redirected from the Russian Federation to Armenia during the war, the express worked without stopping

                Man, what are you talking about? Where does the weapon express from the Russian Federation come from? Does Armenia have a border with the Russian Federation? Yes, part of the weapons of the former SA was transferred to Armenia, but this is not even the 10th part of what Az had. R. Armenia of all 3 Transcaucasian republics received the least amount of weapons. And in Karabakh there was a drop of weapons at all! What a miserable 11 thousand wagons of ammunition ?! Armenians could only dream of such a "minuscule"! You read the data on the balance of forces and weapons. It is still in the public domain. At least read Wikipedia or take links from there.
    3. Azdefence
      Azdefence April 8 2020 18: 37 New
      -2
      Quote: ButchCassidy
      Armenia (even taking into account Nagorno-Karabakh) has no access to the sea.

      But what about Sevan. you almost wanted to put a destroyer there?)
      1. Butchcassidy
        Butchcassidy April 8 2020 20: 10 New
        -1
        But what about Sevan. you almost wanted to put a destroyer there?)

        I AM? Destroyer? Man, what are you talking about?))
      2. Butchcassidy
        Butchcassidy April 9 2020 12: 29 New
        -1
        But what about Sevan. you almost wanted to put a destroyer there?)

        Well, oil, as far as I know, has not yet been learned to drink (without harm to health). And Sevan is the largest proven source of fresh water in the region. I'm not talking about the fact that if desired, the Armenians can leave most of Az. R. without water - for this it is enough to build a system of reservoirs. Turkey is doing the same with Syria.

        But the Armenians are not doing this yet - either good, or gouging, or both.
  • Tests
    Tests April 8 2020 14: 51 New
    0
    KARAKURT15 (İzzet), dear, I’ve served urgently in the last century with Kumyk. He told me how Mehti 2 Tarkovsky swore on the Koran to Paul 1 and became a general in the Russian army ... I understand that the coronavirus epidemic puts pressure on the psyche, drink motherwort, brew peppermint, otherwise write that the Japanese militarists were the first to defend the defenseless USA human history, nuclear bobms in 1945 ... Take care of yourself, health to you ...
  • Grits
    Grits April 8 2020 16: 37 New
    -1
    The title photo shows the frigate of project 11356. And what side is it to the Caspian? Or the author of the drum, which picture to put?
  • Butchcassidy
    Butchcassidy April 8 2020 17: 19 New
    -2
    I'm just for myself, stupidly neighing wassat and why so Azeridefens worries if users of Az.R. everyone is convinced in the comments that there are no conflicts in the waters of the Caspian Sea, including with Turkmenistan, doesn’t Baku have?
    1. Azdefence
      Azdefence April 8 2020 18: 35 New
      -3
      Quote: ButchCassidy
      everyone is convinced in the comments that there are no conflicts in the waters of the Caspian Sea, including with Turkmenistan, doesn’t Baku have?

      Baku has graters only with Iran, with your bros, and with the Turkmen bashi we have long agreed.
      You are the Armenians, and after Syria, it’s Iran’s turn, what will you do?
      1. Butchcassidy
        Butchcassidy April 8 2020 20: 15 New
        0
        Baku has graters only with Iran, with your bros, and with the Turkmen bashi we have long agreed.
        You are the Armenians, and after Syria, it’s Iran’s turn, what will you do?

        Tell me, dear friend, do you really sincerely consider everyone around as rams or do you really sincerely believe in what you say? In Baku and Ashgabat, things are going almost to the point of stabbing, when the question comes to the delimitation of gas fields in the Caspian, what are you talking about? What does Iran and Syria have to do with it? We are talking about the Serdar, Osman and Omar fields (in the Azerbaijani version, the Kapaz Azeri and Chirag areas, respectively)

        PS As for Syria, there are various ISIS members (the organization is banned in Russia), including those who come from Az. R. is systematically left to fertilize the soil. And, God willing (in my opinion, they say "Inshallah"), this issue will be resolved to the end and the evil spirits from the Idlib gadyushnik will suffer deserved punishment from God and people.
        1. Butchcassidy
          Butchcassidy April 9 2020 11: 12 New
          -2
          Quote: ButchCassidy
          In Baku and Ashgabat it’s almost a matter of stabbing, when the question is about the delimitation of gas fields in the Caspian

          The fact that Aliyev and Berdymukhamedov are now bracketing these problems and developing bilateral relations in all other issues does not mean that this issue has been resolved. There are no specific agreements on this issue. And if there were no problems, then a fleet would not be required at all, the coast guard would be dispensed with machine guns to fight poachers. And neither Gabrieli nor the Exocetes would be needed.
  • Old26
    Old26 April 8 2020 19: 11 New
    +2
    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
    Russia sells weapons as it sees fit. And since we are not selling the Ball to Azerbaijan, then there are some concerns about this.

    As a result, our neighbor, instead of having our "Ball", now has an Israeli Gabriel. Fear that Azerbaijan will use "Uranus" against Armenia? So there the fire must be extinguished by other means, political, and not talking - we will sell to this, but we will not sell to this. And then "suddenly" we start to wonder why Uzbekistan or Tajikistan, or who else suddenly buys Chinese air defense systems, French, Italian or Israeli anti-ship missiles? We ourselves are losing our original markets. And the arms market, like nature, abhors a vacuum. As a result, other arms suppliers have now "climbed" in the Caspian and Transcaucasia, and now they cannot simply be driven out of there.

    Quote: cherkas.oe
    Matches are not a toy for children, but rockets even more so. They are not needed by fragile minds, you will grow up and understand that it is better to negotiate than rattle rattles in front of each other.

    Write nonsense. We are losing arms markets, and you think that is what is needed. Minus you from me

    Quote: Cowbra
    Sell ​​them a ball. Go ahead with a kiss - they will sell you a mock-up of anti-ship missiles, just like a mock defense to the Saudis. Almost like a real one, even better - from homna and branches!

    With a clever look, write naked stupidity? Now, instead of "Bala" and, accordingly, money for us (and the binding of Azerbaijan to us, as well as other countries of the former republics of the USSR), the countries of the Caspian basin now have NATO and Israeli anti-ship missiles, Chinese air defense systems, Chinese MLRS. Well, then you shouldn't be indignant afterwards that we were "pushed out" of the arms market and rejoice that we sold the S-400 to three countries.
  • lvov_aleksey
    lvov_aleksey April 8 2020 21: 29 New
    +1
    We learn from the Old Man, but we just have to make offers in return, otherwise there will be no trade.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Phoenix040
    Phoenix040 April 8 2020 21: 54 New
    +2
    Russia is strengthening its defenses as it can and considers it necessary and if it is not pleasant to any of the foreigners, this is not the sadness of Russia !!! You also do a lot of things that infuriate the Russian Federation and you don't give a damn about it, you’re like sovereign and independent ....
  • iouris
    iouris April 9 2020 00: 29 New
    0
    Presidents and governments will figure it out. And the impression that Armenia has created a base, or the United States. So tomorrow the "thinking class" will begin to demand an aircraft carrier and a nuclear submarine.
    1. Alexander Krivets
      Alexander Krivets April 9 2020 13: 04 New
      0
      appetite grows with food, those who don’t know the measure will not be full and gluttony is a sin.
  • VyacheSeymour
    VyacheSeymour April 9 2020 08: 21 New
    +2
    I contemplated for a long time, but decided to attach my 5 kopecks.

    What nonsense: - "Ball (UranE) is not for sale to Azerbaijan because it is capable of striking on land" ???
    Apparently more destructive Tornadoes, Solntsepeks, Peonies, and soon Su and Migi - because they are sold, which are also not capable ???
    And are the S-300s capable of working on land or not?
  • Yury Siritsky
    Yury Siritsky April 9 2020 11: 26 New
    0
    Why the hell should they be armed. Let the Westerners scour the bins.
  • Alexander Krivets
    Alexander Krivets April 9 2020 13: 02 New
    +1
    Everything that is sold abroad turns against Russia. Until they reach their minds and themselves want peace in their land, they should not sell anything at all. Enough of Ukraine. There is experience. It is necessary to somehow solve the issue with them ....
  • Khatul Madan
    Khatul Madan April 9 2020 20: 12 New
    -1
    In principle - as in the market. I want to sell, but I don’t want so ... NE IS FOR SALE!
    At the same time, Azerbaijan is behaving somewhat strangely. It hobbles with a pin ... uh ... mmm ... overseas partners, and wants to buy weapons cheaper in the Russian Federation. At the same time, the Russian Federation does not hinder if someone decides to buy overseas.
    So what is the obstacle?
    No barriers to trade.
    Another thing is that the "partner" is not very reliable.
  • Lara Croft
    Lara Croft April 9 2020 22: 50 New
    -1
    Strange correspondents in
    Azeridefence
    they work, they themselves don’t know what their country needs, on the one hand they write that:
    and Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan will continue strengthen your arsenals through more modern French-Italian, Turkish and Israeli missile systems

    on the other hand, they are offended that the Russian Federation does not sell them
    coastal missile system "Bal-E"

    so if the empirialist SCRCs are the best and most modern, why are the Russian Navy for Azerbaijan?
    1. Arslan Ali
      Arslan Ali April 10 2020 08: 40 New
      0
      [b] [so if the empirialist SCRCs are the best and most modern, why are the Russian Navy for Azerbaijan? / b]

      Read below. "Ball" is most likely very versatile. Rocket over water 1-2 meters, invisible, range suitable. A very serious problem for the missile defense of the fleet, for the air defense, I think too.
  • Arslan Ali
    Arslan Ali April 10 2020 08: 32 New
    0
    Today there are two conflicting articles on the site, the first here is about the fact that the Russian Federation is hindering Azerbaijan, and the second is about how the Russian Federation is ready to sell aircraft

    The plane is not a Ball. Especially the newer modifications. To the same China, when they sold a batch of Su 35, they themselves did not have much in service. "Ball" ground-based missile COMPLEX, Nagorno-Karabakh is mentioned, means for sure not only anti-ship and not only conventional warheads!
  • KARAKURT15
    KARAKURT15 April 10 2020 09: 48 New
    +2
    Quote: smile
    KARAKURT15
    Hello.
    Do you know why you got minus signs? Yes, for too impudent lies. The thing called "Great Turan" is an unbridled fantasy and a damp dream of an overly aggressive country that has long since slipped into the third world.
    She never was, and, naturally - never will be. And you know this very well.
    Personally, I don’t understand why you are lying so openly .... You yourself are discrediting yourself ... if someone will listen to you after such a demonstrative lie, huh?
    Or do you have such lies? :))))
    Well, so, measure the degree of awareness of the audience - here the people are literate. :))))
    I can not wish good luck in your endeavor.
    But I wish you health.
    Goodbye.

    You and those like you are saturated with lies! You are not interesting to me at all. Have a nice one you too...
  • Diverter
    Diverter April 25 2020 10: 07 New
    -1
    Azerbaijan should not sell modern weapons in general.