Microbiorobots created by scientists in the USA can overcome the defense of the body's immune system

Microbiorobots created by scientists in the USA can overcome the defense of the body's immune system

Under the heading “Let's Talk About Science”, we propose to consider the work being carried out at the American Institute of Physics (AIP) in the field of robotic methods of treating diseases. The essence of the work is to create microrobots that can deliver drugs to the cells of a specific human organ, increasing the effectiveness of treatment and reducing the side effect of drugs on cells of healthy organs and tissues of the human body.


A study of scientists in the United States is published in the major scientific journal Bioengineering.

From the material:

In order for microscopic biorobots to effectively overcome the body’s immune barrier, they must consist of “materials understood by the body in a positive way”. They should also be able to freely move through body fluids, including relatively viscous media. Only in this way the drug in the right dose will be delivered without problems to a particular set of cells of an organ or tissue.

A group of scientists led by Nicole Bass and Yunus Alapan say that a control system based on magnetic and even sound impulses is used to move healing microbiores around the body.

Researchers report that they managed to create microscopic systems by combining the so-called nanoerythrosomes (erythrocyte structures) and a special gene substrate. In such a combination, microscopic biorobots can be perceived by human immunity not as foreign bodies.

Microscopic carriers of red blood cells attach to the bacterial membrane using a non-covalent biological link between biotin (a water-soluble vitamin of group B) and streptavidin (a protein produced by Streptomyces avidinii). This process preserves two important erythrocyte membrane proteins: TER119, which is required for attachment by nanoerythrosomes, and CD47, to prevent macrophage uptake. Moreover, the gene substrate is a kind of mover of these biosystems.

Scientists note that during laboratory tests they recorded a reduced immune response to the introduction of microbiorobots with bound molecules of drugs into the body, the role of which was played by vitamins.

The publication says that scientists are going to use this method for the treatment of cancer, when it is necessary to increase the effectiveness of action on specific groups of cells - including to destroy the cells that make up the tumor. Such microrobots were called "healing micro-swimmers."

Experts, having studied the publication, note that this development of American scientists has its own flip side. Indeed, in the case of successful testing of microbiorobots, it is impossible to completely exclude the likelihood that there will be forces that will be ready to use this invention for destructive purposes: for example, for delivery to certain organs and tissues by no means drugs when “disconnecting” the body's immune defense. Moreover, if such a process can also be controlled from the outside.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Azazelo April 8 2020 11: 43 New
    • 8
    • 9
    -1
    One infection is not enough ... still need ????
    1. Tatyana April 8 2020 11: 50 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      They want the best - it will work out as always!
      Nobody has yet canceled the struggle of opposites and the law of negation of negation in nature and society.
      1. Voyager April 8 2020 13: 15 New
        • 7
        • 3
        +4
        Tell this to people who are struggling with rejection of implants, but do not lose hope - if only to live fully.
        1. Tatyana April 8 2020 14: 41 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Quote: Voyager
          Quote: Tatiana
          They want the best - it will work out as always!
          The struggle of opposites and the law of negation of negation in nature and society has not yet been canceled.
          Tell this to people who are struggling with rejection of implants, but do not lose hope - if only to live fully.

          Yes Yes! Offer to tell more about this not just to people, but especially to gentlemen such as, for example, the Rockefeller family and the like!

          In March 2017, the grandson of the oil magnate and the first-ever dollar billionaire John D Rockefeller died in the 102nd year of his life. One of the founders of the Bilderber Club, which includes only influential politicians, tycoons, the world elite
          Seven hearts transplanted to David Rockefeller did not help. Billionaire He died at the 102nd year of his life, but this billionaire planned to live at least 200 years.
          Trying to keep my priceless life as long as possible, David Rockefeller survived 7 heart transplants. Whose hearts it was, it remains only to GUESS ....

          1. Voyager April 8 2020 15: 23 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            What do organ transplants and Rockefellers have to do with this topic? Or do you only know about the Rockefellers, and do not care about millions of people with disabilities?
            Turn on your head and say nothing at last, if you suddenly realized that you froze stupidity with your "law of denial." We are not in Sparta 500 BC
            1. Tatyana April 8 2020 15: 46 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              It is strange that you mean only the struggle against rejection of inorganic implants during organ transplants, and for some reason you excluded the struggle against rejection of living biological organs from your mind.
              Where and from whom will you take so many living organs, if you are talking about implantation in general? And to whom and from whom will they get? Ordinary citizens? Something I very much doubt it.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. Voyager April 8 2020 17: 48 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                I mean this, because I directly said about IMPLANTS. Have you mixed it up with TRANSPLANTERS. An implant is a product of inorganic origin, and for some reason you have transplanted here, that is, donor organs for transplantation and Rockefellers.
                The development of science in the field of implantation and the introduction of medical bio / mechanisms is partly called for the development of worthy analogues of transplantation, at least until the spare organs learn to grow separately! These are advanced technologies that directly affect the quality of life of people and which all powerful countries are trying to develop.
                1. Tatyana April 8 2020 18: 29 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Quote: Voyager
                  i.e. donor organs for transplantation and Rockefellers.

                  Firstly. No mechanical organs are equivalent to natural ones and give only a limited period of life to the patient and with limited capabilities.
                  Therefore, it is unlikely that the same gentlemen of the Rockefellers will put themselves artificial organs instead of natural ones, except for replacing eye lenses with artificial ones.
                  Secondly. The rejection of the body is possible after transplantation of both natural and artificial organs.
                  And thirdly,
                  Quote: Voyager
                  The development of science in the field of implantation and the introduction of medical bio / mechanisms is partly called for the development of worthy analogues of transplantation, at least until the spare organs learn to grow separately! These are advanced technologies that directly affect the quality of life of people and which all powerful countries are trying to develop.
                  while scientists learn how to grow organs separately and use them for “owners of money” who dream of living and parasitizing for 200 years each, the negative results of doctors in this issue of drug “robotization” may well become and will certainly become a biological weapon of mass destruction of people. I have no doubt about that.
                  So this is a double-edged sword.
                  1. Voyager April 8 2020 18: 44 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    Well, in what place have I ever talked about mechanical organs?

                    You have an amazing combination of the gift to read illiterate "educational programs" and talent to dump everything in one mess with the taste of a world conspiracy. I wash my hands.
                    1. Tatyana April 8 2020 19: 01 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      Quote: Voyager
                      Well, in what place have I ever talked about mechanical organs?

                      Let it be "Vanka to wallow"!
                      By the mechanical principle, for example, artificial joints work and they do not need any electronics.
                      Also, artificial folding eye lenses, folded in half, are inserted into the eye through a small incision and then they are deployed there into a full disk.
                      1. Shurik70 April 8 2020 21: 50 New
                        • 0
                        • 1
                        -1
                        The argument is NOTHING.
                        The creation of medical nanorobots is a matter of the inevitable (in the case of the survival of mankind) future.
                        This is a promising business. The long-awaited. Implants. Oncology treatment. Restoration of any tissues (including cartilage and nerve fibers). Rejuvenation of the body. And in the distant future - even the treatment of hereditary diseases.

                        Like any human activity, this achievement of science will be used both for war, and for the Security and Intelligence Services, too. This is inevitable (although completely undesirable for civilians).
                      2. Tatyana April 8 2020 22: 28 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Shurik70
                        The argument is NOTHING.

                        The debate is about the class-nationalist nature of the development of science, as such, both the scientific inventions themselves and their use. Namely. Who creates science, for what purpose and in whose interests and how to use it?

                        Voyager clings to my comment
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        They want the best - it will work out as always!
                        The struggle of opposites and the law of negation of negation in nature and society has not yet been canceled.
                        He, you see, did not like the mention of the law of “the struggle of opposites” and of the law of “negation of negation”.

                        Let me remind you. Hitler and Co. programmed in advance not to render any services for dental prosthetics to the Soviet people during the Second World War occupied by the Germans. Like, let the occupied go toothless so that everyone from afar could see their lower race in comparison with the Germans-Aryans.
          2. Tatyana April 8 2020 16: 09 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            Quote: Voyager
            Turn on your head and say nothing at last, if you suddenly realized that you froze stupidity with your "law of denial."

            Well, if the law of "negation of negation" is not known or understood by you, then it is not my fault.
            First, all dual-use developments fit into the law of “negation of negation”.
            And secondly, the concept of “law of the negation of negation” fits in that they first deliberately develop what helps people, and then everything that this original goal-setting destroys. And vice versa.
            1. Voyager April 8 2020 17: 54 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              My message was only that you cannot correctly apply dialectical materialism in life.
              1. Tatyana April 8 2020 18: 38 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Voyager
                My message was only that you cannot correctly apply dialectical materialism in life.

                But you think exclusively metaphysically and limited - no further than a step - in causal relationships for the future you see nothing dangerous for society in scientific endeavors at all.
    2. Ros 56 April 8 2020 13: 39 New
      • 1
      • 5
      -4
      Who the striped want the best? Well, well, it’s not bad to dream, the wolf took pity on the mare, left his tail and mane. These ears would have burned everything on earth long ago, if they had known for sure that they themselves would not end, there was no faith in them for their shameful deeds.
  2. figwam April 8 2020 12: 05 New
    • 2
    • 7
    -5
    Quote: Azazelo
    One infection is not enough ... still need ????

    The more infections, the faster all people will agree to vaccinations, and they will secretly contain nanorobots, and they will undergo chipization under the same pretext, after which authorities will control the life and health of every person.
    1. Maki Avellevich April 8 2020 13: 32 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: figvam
      The more infections, the faster all people will agree to vaccinations, and they will secretly contain nanorobots, and they will undergo chipization under the same pretext, after which authorities will control the life and health of every person.

      where are you going? Now there are no vaccinations?
      why then already now they do not “control human life and health”?
      dozens of vaccinations that are now not only enough nano robots but already and just robots to vaccinate all of humanity.
      I'll buy aluminum foil
  • Cowbra April 8 2020 11: 57 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Recently I was stunned to read an article here entirely composed of gossip about GMOs. What will the author say about the artificially created structure, arranged in the form of a hybrid of a bacterium with an erythrocyte? In biology, this is called a “chimera" - a mutant artificially created from two organisms, which was launched in this case into a person in order to nail his protective mechanisms? wassat
    In general, it’s a long-standing topic, only sidesteps have not yet been circumvented. For example - the robot delivered medicine, but what next? Collapsed? He’s from a erythrocyte scabby, and so with jaundice it is the erythrocytes that you stuffed compactly into an already diseased organ that turn yellow
    1. boss April 8 2020 13: 37 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      what are you guys ?!
      Hare grumble, chic, talented and certainly necessary and useful development!
      I remember the rumors went that the radio waves of the phones plant the heart, from the magnetic waves of the mobile - the brain melts, and the ears of the skull are deformed)
      dental fillings, best cement, with an admixture of silver and crushed ceramic powder for color, and from UV fillings burns remain forever in the mouth)
      and where to the cassette to the bobbin, and the transistor to the honest lamp
      nishtyak, invented a new method for targeted delivery of toxic drugs.
      The main thing is to implement it sooner!
      oh yes, and in oppa turbberg this, high appendicitis treats with hunger and broths itself
  • Proton April 8 2020 12: 03 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Again, what thread filth will bring am
  • Mebius April 8 2020 12: 06 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    They should also be able to move freely through biological fluids.

    And in alcohol-moonshine, how do they behave? drinks People are interested in the village ..
    1. AU Ivanov. April 8 2020 12: 14 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      Like what? They plump with red blood cells, sing songs and fight with white blood cells.
  • Nikolaevich I April 8 2020 12: 16 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    There is such an expression: "dual-use products (products)"! It is on the basis of such "microbiorobots" that it is possible to create both WMDs, that is, means for organizing epidemics (pandemics), so local means, even individual ones ... Moreover, plans for creating "microbial robots" were announced at the end of the last century .. Naturally, no antibiotics, vaccines, for these "microrobots" (or, perhaps, "nanorobots"?) Will act! Moreover, it is possible to create "microbes-robots" with a self-propagation program in place! By the way, the plans for creating "micro-cyborgs" include (were) those that do not have to destroy people, but also those that temporarily or partially "disable manpower" ... "spoil" fuel, rubber, plastic, microchips, explosives ...
    1. Cowbra April 8 2020 12: 23 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      By the way, the plans for creating "micro-cyborgs" include (were) those that do not have to destroy people, but also those that temporarily or partially "disable manpower" ... "spoil" fuel, rubber, plastic, microchips, explosives ...

      Old horror movie. It’s called “gray dust.” The trouble is that, in principle, it is not controlled and the timer cannot be pushed into the nanobot, it will hit everyone at once
  • NEXUS April 8 2020 12: 18 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    I read the article ... it seemed to me alone that the world was being prepared for universal chipping, and therefore for control? Now people are not surprised that the mobile phone “hears” its owner and issues an advertisement for the goods that the owner spoke about. So the mattresses set the goal apparently to even greater control of the population.
    1. voyaka uh April 8 2020 12: 40 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Generic chipping will be certain. Starting from clinics.
      First in chronic patients to monitor their condition, and then in all.
      And not only for medical purposes.
      Swedes, for example, already now many people sew a microchip in their hand to ride
      in public transport. Instead of a magnetic card in a wallet.
      And you can use absolutely everything for bad purposes. Any invention.
      1. Voyager April 8 2020 13: 18 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Well, many in Sweden - it is said loudly. A few thousand. In any country of comparable size, there are so many comers. Nevertheless, everything goes to this, of course.
      2. Aqr009 April 8 2020 21: 45 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Generic chipping will be certain.

        There will be demand, there will be supply, in China they will mass-produce penny chip emulators, jammers, reflectors ...
  • Rostislav April 8 2020 13: 59 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    it is impossible to completely exclude the likelihood that there will be forces that will be ready to use this invention for destructive purposes: for example, for delivery to certain organs and tissues by no means drugs

    The words "cannot be completely excluded ..." should be replaced by "Guaranteed to find forces that ..."
    So that specialists miss the opportunity to master a new way to kill?