Anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142M3 Pacific Fleet fulfilled the search for a submarine in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk

Anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142M3 Pacific Fleet fulfilled the search for a submarine in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk

Three long-range anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142M3 Pacific fleet worked out the search and tracking of submarines of the conditional enemy in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. This was reported by the press service of the Pacific Fleet.


According to the report, three long-range anti-submarine Tu-142M3 took off from the Kamenny Ruchei airfield and patrolled over the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, during which a search was made for submarines of a conditional enemy.

During the flight, the crews of three long-range Tu-142mz anti-submarine aircraft from the Kamenny Ruchey aerodrome worked out the search, classification, tracking and application tasks over the Sea of ​​Okhotsk weapons enemy conventional submarines

- said in a statement.

In addition, the crews worked out the integrated use of radar and sonar detection equipment, staging buoys, receiving and analyzing the information transmitted by them. After detecting enemy submarines in a given area, the aircraft inflicted a conditional blow on them.

Tu-142M aircraft are a modernized version of the long-range Tu-142 anti-submarine aircraft, created on the basis of the Tu-95 strategic bomber. In the version of the Tu-142M3 was adopted in 1985, was mass-produced until 1994. The maximum flight range exceeds 12 km, flight speed with a mass of 000 tons at an altitude of 138 meters - up to 7000 km / h. Flight duration - 855 hours. The aircraft are equipped with submarine detection tools, as well as missiles, bombs and mines.
Photos used:
PJSC United Aircraft Corporation
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. silberwolf88 April 5 2020 12: 04 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    Continuous combat training and combat alert ... the cornerstone of the units of constant readiness ... and it’s good that they don’t save on these tasks ... this is the guarantee of high combat readiness of troops and weapons
    1. Teberii April 5 2020 12: 14 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      Nobody has canceled the defense of borders. And this is good.
    2. Uncle lee April 5 2020 12: 15 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      But is that not so? Minus, who slapped? Clearly the fifth column!
      1. Lipchanin April 5 2020 13: 24 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        ? Clearly the fifth column!

        On all branches so
        1. Uncle lee April 5 2020 13: 30 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Quote: Lipchanin
          On all branches

          And all in a row and indiscriminately ... Small dirty tricks!
          1. Lipchanin April 5 2020 13: 33 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            Quote: Uncle Lee
            And all in a row and indiscriminately

            Not everyone. It looks like they have a list at the “headquarters”. Here's the list and "work"
          2. Sergej1972 April 5 2020 14: 43 New
            • 7
            • 1
            +6
            I accidentally discovered that for my comments two or three weeks ago they threw cons.
      2. Ros 56 April 5 2020 13: 33 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        On VO is full of idiots, minuses put on the sly, and what, for what and why, rarely anyone explains.
        1. Uncle lee April 5 2020 13: 42 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Quote: Ros 56
          full of idiots

          Even on patriotic, “right” comments they manage to put on their own stupidity!
          1. Lipchanin April 5 2020 13: 55 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            Quote: Uncle Lee
            Even on patriotic, “right” comments they manage to put on their own stupidity!

            Their mind is absent. There is a "scent" that sometimes fails
        2. Lipchanin April 5 2020 13: 54 New
          • 7
          • 3
          +4
          We’ve gotten to the point that you’re just asking a question, and you’re minus request
          The question is, for what? request
          For what you don’t know? So the site for this exists
      3. Aleksandr1971 April 6 2020 05: 50 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        It is very strange that this information is presented as news. Apparently anti-submarine aircraft before this "event" stood idle for years at military airports. And now there was a joy - a flight to refine the search for submarines!
        In fact, such events should be daily as well as daily hygiene.
    3. smart ass April 5 2020 13: 39 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      What weapons does he have?
  2. iouris April 5 2020 12: 14 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    It matters how many US SSBNs are on alert and how many of them remain undetected.
  3. knn54 April 5 2020 12: 25 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    For a long time, the "old people" will fly. What is that Il?
    The Yankees have more than 50 of the latest R-8 Poseidon anti-submarine aircraft, which have recently entered service. And 120 are planned! And if you compare the possibilities, then the gap is a whole generation. About the number of veterans in general I am silent.
  4. UVB
    UVB April 5 2020 12: 34 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    In the photo of the Tu-95MS, if not mistaken. and this is Tu-142M3
    1. Piramidon April 5 2020 12: 59 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      Quote: UVB
      In the photo of the Tu-95MS, if not mistaken. and this is Tu-142M3

      As usual, the amateur author slapped the first photo that came across. He's like a drum. It seems and okay. VO users for suckers holds.
    2. Vladi_S April 5 2020 13: 23 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      In the photo in the title of MS ...
    3. UVB
      UVB April 5 2020 13: 40 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: UVB
      In the photo of the Tu-95MS, if not mistaken.
      Already changed the photo in the article
      1. Oleg1263 April 5 2020 13: 42 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Thank you so much. For five minutes he stared at the screen, already his eyes ached, trying to find the difference.
      2. Piramidon April 5 2020 17: 47 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: UVB
        Already changed the photo in the article

        After being poked with a nose.
    4. Grits April 5 2020 15: 06 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: UVB
      In the photo of the Tu-95MS, if not mistaken. and this is Tu-142M3

      And what are the main external differences?
      1. Piramidon April 5 2020 17: 48 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Gritsa
        And what are the main external differences?

        At least a fairing under the fuselage
      2. UVB
        UVB April 5 2020 19: 15 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And what are the main external differences?
        This is the Tu-95MS, about the same angle as the 142nd in the article. Compare.
  5. Vladi_S April 5 2020 13: 19 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    Reading such messages, the question arises whether the aircraft are unique and have no analogs, or the boats are noisy for the whole ok ...
    1. Red Alert April 5 2020 13: 38 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Can they detect a Virginia sub?
  6. Ros 56 April 5 2020 13: 39 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    So they were created for this, what is there to discuss, they work their work, as intended.
    1. Avior April 5 2020 17: 11 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Hardly them against Virginia created
      Virginia appeared in the Amer fleet in 2004, and the Tu-142 in the Soviet fleet in 1972, as the modernization of the Tu-95RC in 1963.
      No matter how you upgrade, it's high time
      A new one.
      1. Ros 56 April 5 2020 17: 13 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Holy simplicity, it was created against any adversaries, including against future ones. hi
        1. Avior April 5 2020 17: 16 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Create for certain tasks. What boats were then, against them and created.
          Those Lafayettes, against which they created, were written off in the late 80s, early 90s
  7. Peter Tverdokhlebov April 5 2020 13: 39 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    At the Kamenny Stream airfield there is an object 12 of the Main Directorate, namely, the repair and technical base.
    I suppose there should be at least 20 special air bombs (SpAb), namely, multi-purpose impact-resistant deep air bombs developed by VNIITF. In peacetime, anti-submarine aircraft use conventional deep-seated aerial bombs; during the threatened period, SpAbs are installed on aircraft. In cases of the outbreak of war, part of SpAb can be used against enemy submarines and another part against ground targets.
  8. orionvitt April 5 2020 13: 58 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    a search was made for submarines of a conventional enemy.
    Well, if conditional, then it’s understandable, otherwise I’ve already tensed up. The Sea of ​​Okhotsk, sort of like the inland sea of ​​Russia.
    1. Avior April 5 2020 15: 12 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      No, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is not inland.
      It goes to Hokkaido in the south.
    2. Lara Croft April 5 2020 18: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: orionvitt
      a search was made for submarines of a conventional enemy.
      Well, if conditional, then it’s understandable, otherwise I’ve already tensed up. The Sea of ​​Okhotsk, sort of like the inland sea of ​​Russia.

      According to the international law of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, it is considered the inland sea of ​​the Russian Federation ...
      https://topwar.ru/36206-mezhdunarodnoe-priznanie-za-rossiey-ohotskogo-morya-radovatsya-ili-iskat-podvodnye-kamni.html
      Therefore, our Japanese will not give up the Kuril ridge, since it (the sea) will lose its status as an internal ....
      1. Avior April 5 2020 21: 37 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        by your link
        If the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is recognized as the inland sea of ​​Russia .... The Sea of ​​Okhotsk is indeed surrounded by Russian territories, but on the southern outskirts it is washed by the shores of the Japanese island of Hokkaido.

        “If recognized” and “recognized” are two big differences.
        Not recognized.
        Only economic zone.
        The Sea of ​​Okhotsk is the sea of ​​the Pacific Ocean, separated from it by the Kamchatka Peninsula, the Kuril Islands and the island of Hokkaido. From the neighboring Sea of ​​Japan, the Pacific Ocean is separated by Sakhalin Island. Washes the shores of Russia and Japan [1]. The former name is the Kamchatka Sea [2].

        Most of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk outside the territorial waters of Russia and Japan belongs to the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of Russia, with the exception of a small part adjacent to the island of Hokkaido and belonging to the EEZ of Japan, as well as a narrow enclave in the central part of the sea, which is more than than 200 nautical miles from all coasts. The enclave is completely surrounded by the EEZ of the Russian Federation, according to the application of Russia [3] and the subsequent decision of the UN Commission on the borders of the continental shelf of March 14, 2014 [4] assigned to the continental shelf of Russia, so the Russian Federation has exclusive rights to the resources of the subsoil and the seabed in this part (but not on the covering waters and the airspace above them); The media sometimes make erroneous statements that the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is completely inland waters of Russia[5].

        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9E%D1%85%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B5_%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5
        hi
  9. Nehist April 5 2020 14: 53 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Wow. Finally, they began to fly with Mongohto !! What kind of airbase was there :( it's a pity that nothing new flies, but all the same old people, outdated even at the time of modernization
  10. Round Smesharik April 5 2020 15: 06 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Fly, fly a petal, through west, east .. That's how we live in Russia!
    Quote: Nehist
    Wow. Finally, they began to fly with Mongohto !!

    They started, but what to do .. Russia is in danger!
  11. Lara Croft April 5 2020 18: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    PLO is good, but I wonder what empiric submarine, PLA, PLARK and SSBN will go into the almost closed Sea of ​​Okhotsk (just interesting, from the point of view of banal erudition ...) ...
  12. Dzafdet April 5 2020 20: 59 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Tu-142 lags behind the American Poseidon for about 10 years ... Will they be able to catch up is unknown ...
  13. Lara Croft April 5 2020 21: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Avior
    by your link
    If the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is recognized as the inland sea of ​​Russia .... The Sea of ​​Okhotsk is indeed surrounded by Russian territories, but on the southern outskirts it is washed by the shores of the Japanese island of Hokkaido.

    “If recognized” and “recognized” are two big differences.
    Not recognized.
    Only economic zone.

    Taki article 2013
    Calm down the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, as if you would not like the opposite ... here's an article already in 2014
    From March 15, 2014 A plot of 52 thousand square kilometers in the central part of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, which was still considered international waters, was transferred to Russia. This right secured the United Nations for Russia. In this way The Sea of ​​Okhotsk has become a completely inland sea in Russia.

    https://rg.ru/2014/03/17/more.html
    1. Aleksandr1971 April 6 2020 05: 56 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Formally legal is not the same as the actual one. Russia does not have enough PLO resources to control the straits leading to the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. Therefore, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, as a combat duty area for our SSBNs, is unsafe.
      It is necessary not only to update and strengthen the PLO aviation, but also to install stationary sonars and other search systems for enemy submarines in the Kuril Islands. Moreover, a lot of time will pass before the design, construction and putting into service of new PLO aircraft (if, alas, not forever).
      Stationary systems are at least cheaper than aviation, and unlike aviation, they can be constantly in operation.
      1. Lara Croft April 6 2020 22: 35 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Aleksandr1971
        Formally legal is not the same as the actual one. Russia does not have enough PLO funds to control the straits,

        No country in the world has
        enough PLO funds

        Therefore, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, as a combat duty area for our SSBNs, is unsafe.

        Therefore, there (like on the KSF) helicopter carriers and destroyers are needed in the far sea zone (on the outside of the straits) and PLO, SCRC, radar tracking surface and underwater conditions (inside it) ... however, it costs money and time, and also technology and network shipyards ...
        Senior comrades no stupider than you know what to do ...
        Stationary systems are at least cheaper than aviation, and unlike aviation, they can be constantly in operation.

        Advise the United States and others to the empirialists, apparently they are not in the know ... because their basic PLO aviation is better than ours ...
        Well, okay, and not a military man you know better ...
        1. iouris April 7 2020 01: 15 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Lara Croft
          their basic PLO aviation is better than ours ...

          This is because against them acts on the order of (significantly) fewer SSBNs. They, I believe, not without reason, hope to destroy them with a green whistle.
          1. Lara Croft April 7 2020 16: 06 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: iouris
            This is because against them acts on the order of (significantly) fewer SSBNs.

            This is because the PLA Navy has almost none (by the way, maybe for the better for us ...) ...
            They, I believe, not without reason, hope to destroy them with a green whistle.

            "Blessed is he who believes ...."