Mauser Tankgewehr M1918 anti-tank rifle. First of its kind

21

PTR T-Gewehr early release with bipod from MG 08/15, the shutter is open. Photo Sassik.livejournal.com

In September 1916, Great Britain first applied to the battlefield. Tanks, and soon this technique became a regular participant in the battles. The German army immediately began to look for ways to deal with tanks, including create anti-tank weapons suitable for use by infantry. The most notable result of such searches was the appearance of the Tankgewehr M1918 anti-tank rifle from Mauser.

Problems and solutions


By 1916, the German army was already armed with an armor-piercing rifle cartridge of 7,92x57 mm with a Spitzgeschoss mit Kern (SmK) type bullet. The parameters of such ammunition were sufficient to defeat the early British tanks, and regular army rifles turned into anti-tank rifles. In addition, the SmK bullet was quite effective in anti-aircraft fire.



However, after a few months more advanced tanks appeared with enhanced armor. The survivability of aircraft also grew steadily. The SmK bullet lost its effectiveness and required replacement. The army needed new means to combat armored vehicles and aviation.

In October 1917, the Gewehr-Prüfungskommission (GPK) commission launched a program for the development of a new rifle complex. To deal with tanks and aircraft, it was necessary to create a heavy machine gun and a cartridge for it. Subsequently such weapon called MG 18 Tank und Flieger.


Rifle with a new bipod. Wikimedia Commons Photos

However, the development of the rifle complex could take a lot of time, and new weapons were required as soon as possible. In this regard, there was a proposal to create a special anti-tank rifle of the simplest design possible, which could be put into production as soon as possible. Despite obvious limitations, even such a temporary solution allowed us to obtain positive results.

In November 1917, Mauser received an order to create a promising PTR. To accelerate work in the conditions of a lack of resources, the project was given a high priority - the same as the production of submarines. Thanks to this, in January 1918 the first prototype was manufactured, and in May they launched mass production.

The new model was adopted as the Mauser Tankgewehr M1918. Also abbreviated as T-Gewehr.

New cartridge


As the basis of the program, a new cartridge with high penetration characteristics was considered. In the early stages of its project, the Mauser studied several similar structures with a bullet of 13 to 15 mm caliber and various characteristics.


Britain is studying trophies: a .303 British rifle cartridge (left) compared to the German 13.2 mm TuF. Wikimedia Commons Photos

The solution was found thanks to the Polte cartridge plant from Magdeburg. He has already created an experimental cartridge with an armor-piercing bullet of 13,2 mm caliber and a 92-mm sleeve with a partially protruding flange. The finished cartridge was adopted under the designation 13.2 mm Tank und Flieger (TuF).

The cartridge was equipped with a 13,2 mm bullet with a hardened steel core. It was possible to obtain an initial speed of 780 m / s at an energy of 15,9 kJ. At a distance of 100 m this allowed to penetrate 20 mm of homogeneous armor (angle 0 °); 300 m penetration decreased to 15 mm.

Scale rifle


To speed up the development, they decided to make the new T-Gewehr based on the design of the serial Gewehr 98 rifle, supplemented by some elements from the Gewehr 88. This allowed us to do without a long and complicated search for technical solutions to obtain the desired result. However, the original design still had to be scaled for a new cartridge, refined taking into account different energy and improved ergonomics.

T-Gewehr was a single-shot large-caliber rifle with a sliding bolt. The barrel with a reinforced receiver and the simplest trigger was fixed on a wooden bed. The store was absent; it was proposed to supply cartridges through a window for ejecting cartridges.

Mauser Tankgewehr M1918 anti-tank rifle. First of its kind
German PTR and British SMLE rifle. Photo Tanks-encyclopedia.com

Experienced rifles and the first 300 serial received a rifled barrel with a length of 861 mm (65 klb) with relatively thick walls. Later, thinner trunks with a length of 960 mm (73 klb) were produced. They allowed to reduce the total mass of the rifle, as well as slightly improve combat qualities.

PTR received a shutter made on the basis of the decisions of the Gew.88 and Gew.98 projects. Its main part was distinguished by its large size and corresponding mass. Locking was carried out by two pairs of combat stops in the front and rear parts of the bolt. As before, in the back there was a fuse flag that blocked the movement of the drummer. In the event of a breakthrough of gases from the liner, three holes were provided in the bolt — through them, gases from the projectile channel were discharged to the outside.

The first 300 rifles retained the full-time sight from Gew.98, marked up to 2000 m. Next, a new open sight was used with markings from 100 to 500 m. Effective shooting at tanks with 500 meters or more was excluded. Moreover, most modern enemy armored vehicles could be hit with only 300 m.

A small part of the rifles received a solid wooden box. Most were equipped with glued stocks with attached bottom of the butt. The reinforced box had a neck too thick, which is why a pistol grip appeared under it.


Calculation of Tankgewehr on a position. Photo Armedconflicts.com

The PTR of the first issues was equipped with a biped bipod from the MG 08/15 machine gun. It was not too comfortable and later gave way to a new one, designed specifically for T-Gewehr. The standard mount for the bipod on the bed made it possible to put the rifle on all installations compatible with a light machine gun. The troops often improvised and put the PTR at other bases, including trophy.

Depending on the barrel, the M1918 PTR had a length of not more than 1680 mm. Late rifles with a long barrel without a cartridge and a bipod weighed 15,7 kg.

Rifles in the service


Already in the early summer of 1918, the first serial PTR of the new model went to units on the Western Front, where the Entente actively used tanks. Serial production was launched at the Neckar factory in Obendorf. Quite quickly, the enterprise reached the highest production rates. 300 PTRs were produced daily. Until the end of the war produced approx. 16 thousand of such products.

The weapons were transferred to infantry regiments, where special rifle divisions were formed. Each regiment was supposed to only 2-3 PTR, however, the proposed tactics of use made it possible to realize the potential of weapons even with a small number.


Anti-tank rifle on the machine gun mount of the captured Mark IV tank. Photo Tanks-encyclopedia.com

The calculation of the rifle consisted of two people - the shooter and assistant. Due to the specifics of the combat work, the PTRs were trusted by the most brave fighters who were able to let the tank 250-300 m away and shoot it in cold blood. Wearable ammunition included 132 rounds of 13.2 mm TuF. The arrow relied on a bag of 20 rounds, the rest carried the second number.

The main tactic of using T-Gewehr was to focus on tank hazardous areas. The shooters were to fire on approaching tanks, trying to damage vital units or injure the crew. In this they were helped by fighters with regular SmK rifles and bullets.

13,2 mm bullets could penetrate the tank’s armor and cause damage to units or people. Cracking of the armor and the destruction of rivets were also observed, giving a stream of fragments without direct penetration. The simultaneous use of anti-tank rifles and rifles increased the chances of incapacitating the tank.

It should be noted that the PTR from the Mauser did not differ in convenience and ease of operation, which affected the combat use. The rifle had no means of reducing recoil. To avoid injuries, the shooters had to change after several shots. However, in this case, there were headaches, temporary hearing loss and even dislocations. It was Tankgewehr that caused the jokes about weapons, from which you can shoot only twice - according to the number of healthy shoulders.


Canadian soldiers are studying German PTR on a wheeled machine. Photos Archives Canada

In general, the Mauser Tankgewehr M1918 anti-tank rifle has established itself as a fairly effective, but difficult to use weapon. It significantly strengthened the defense of the German troops and caused damage to the enemy. The exact losses of the Entente from PTR fire are unknown. However, they were sufficient to stimulate the development of armored vehicles and crew protection equipment.

After the war


The period of active use of P-T-Gewehr PTR lasted only a few months - until the ceasefire. During this time, part of the issued rifles was lost or decommissioned, but the army had at its disposal significant stockpiles of weapons. Soon, the Treaty of Versailles determined their future fate.

Under the terms of the peace treaty, Germany was prohibited from arming anti-tank rifles. The accumulated stocks of M1918 products were seized as reparations and shared between several countries. Part of the rifles soon hit the secondary market. So, Belgium received several thousand PTRs, and then sold a significant part of them to China.

German PTRs dispersed to many countries and underwent careful study. Attempts were made to copy and refine the existing design - with different results and successes. Their main result was an understanding of the fundamental possibility of creating a relatively light anti-tank system for infantry. Soon, this concept was developed, as a result of which new variants of anti-tank rifles appeared.

It is worth recalling that the Mauser Tankgewehr PTR was developed as a temporary measure in anticipation of a heavy machine gun. The latter was able to create and even released an extremely small series, but it was the "temporary" rifle that was widely used. Moreover, it became the first model of a new class and led to the emergence of a mass of new weapons of a similar purpose.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 18 2020 07: 20
    A group of German attack aircraft.
    1. +7
      April 18 2020 07: 46
      The smallest gave the biggest gun))
      1. +4
        April 18 2020 11: 52
        he probably shot at planes, flattened him with recoil
  2. 0
    April 18 2020 10: 07
    With such a caliber, the simplest design, without a muzzle compensator ... recourse oh and the shoulder probably hurt from the wild recoil ... the bipods were hardly much saved ..
    1. -1
      April 18 2020 10: 45
      I think that in this cuirass, which is in the photo above, the recoil of a powerful cartridge was distributed evenly over the whole body and it was possible to withstand more than "one shot on a healthy shoulder." But be it ...
      1. 0
        April 18 2020 10: 51
        Stormtroopers were running in cuirass, and then not all the time, but "on business", the rest of the army did not wear a cloth "overcoat". It is unlikely that the anti-tank crews had a regular cuirass, they did not need to be in an ambush, and the poor fellows would have worried to carry it in an appendage to the anti-tank rifle and ammunition, not counting the rest of the equipment.
  3. +3
    April 18 2020 12: 17
    The Germans managed to save some part of the 13,2-mm ATR ... to hide it. In the 30s, these PTRs were used in training centers for training "anti-tankers" ... And in the USSR, in 41, for some time, Sholokhov's 12,7-mm PTR was produced, based on the German 13,2-mm PTR .. ...
    1. +3
      April 18 2020 18: 04
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      And in the USSR in the 41st some time they produced 12,7-mm Sholokhov PTR

      hi
      The Soviet version was equipped with a TDK and a shock absorber on the butt.
      Specialists from Tula finalized the German design.
  4. 0
    April 18 2020 16: 50
    It looks harmonious, did not know anything about this gun, thanks!
  5. 0
    April 18 2020 19: 36
    Canadians take off smartphones like)
    1. Aag
      0
      April 20 2020 11: 17
      Did they publish an article for me twice? Thanks, I understood the first time.)))
      Thanks for the article. hi
      1. 0
        April 20 2020 15: 33
        Current, I did not understand anything))
        1. Aag
          0
          April 20 2020 16: 25
          I have the text of the article two times in succession (with photo) on the smartphone crawls out.
          1. 0
            April 20 2020 16: 27
            And I have one. Sometimes it’s a glitch.
            1. Aag
              0
              April 20 2020 17: 07
              Question to the author of the article. Method for making trunks for a new caliber? Turning, drilling, forging, broaching, (well, apparently, not casting))))).
              No, really, I want to understand (the beginning of the last century, the country a producer is an outcast in the world): equipment, production capacities, resources from where? It is clear that the scale is not Linkor’s, but, as they say, a chicken is biting.
              It sounds dissonant, but the impression is that for the Russian Federation, in the current conditions, this is very relevant. (When shipyard workers go to replace their tools, consumables, here, the site skipped).
              1. Aag
                0
                April 20 2020 17: 14
                Sorry, pent ...
                The company (Irkutsk), in which I work, buys cutting discs for angle grinders, made in China, (Bosch) in Moscow, sells to "Zvezda"! Hurry up, but Russian Railways are loaded!
                If something is not clear, please correct ... hi
              2. +1
                April 20 2020 17: 54
                Of course, I’m not an author, but the question is interesting — apparently they removed it, removed the stress, carried out a heat treatment, then they drilled. Deep drilling was already (although probably more primitive than now)
                1. Aag
                  +2
                  April 20 2020 18: 38
                  Of course, nobody will disclose the intricacies of the process. The question, apparently, is a common one for the entire VO community. Since we talk about weapons, armaments so often, it would be nice to touch on the topic of technologies, methods and methods of producing the subjects of our discussion, interest, to some extent adoration ... We must pay tribute to some authors of articles, they try to do it. But, for the most part, they are limited to phrases like "there were no opportunities", "the production potential did not allow", etc.
                  I realize that it was only my desire, but, along with this, I think that part of the audience will support me in this regard.
                  1. +1
                    April 20 2020 19: 11
                    It would be interesting, but it’s up to the authors, there was an article that, at the moment, it’s not going through the best of times (income has declined)
                    1. Aag
                      +1
                      April 20 2020 19: 13
                      Again damned capitalism, with an insatiable thirst for profit? Well, or raising funds for a living ...
  6. +1
    April 21 2020 21: 57
    Until the end of the war produced approx. 16 thousand of such products.
    The weapons were transferred to infantry regiments, where special rifle divisions were formed. Each regiment was supposed to only 2-3 PTR

    "I do not believe!" (from)
    Well then, how long was it in the West in the 1918th German regiments ?? !!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"