There is no sign of Assad’s desire to abandon chemical weapons, Israeli experts at Breaking Defense


Ari Egotsi, a correspondent for Breaking Defense in Israel, presented material on the practice of striking IDF air strikes on Syrian territory. The material begins with a statement by an unnamed representative of the Israeli Ministry of Defense that “Israel will not allow the Syrian regime to store and produce chemical weapon».


The same source, according to the author, confirmed the recent missile strikes on the territory of the SAR, saying that their purpose was including "objects of the military chemical industry."

From the material:

We will continue to strike as intelligence is obtained.

The article cites a statement by the former director of military-political affairs at the Israeli Ministry of Defense, Amos Gilead, who claims that Damascus previously had stockpiles of 1,3 thousand tons of chemical weapons, but something that supposedly remained after disposal.

Gilead:

The main part was destroyed, but the regime still stores part of the chemical weapons. There is no indication that Assad wants to abandon him. It is extremely worrying that even a few grams of the filling of such weapons can do huge harm, killing people.

Strange logic. If the same article expresses concern about the danger of “even a few grams of chemical weapons stuffing” and talks about the readiness to continue striking at Syrian military chemical industry facilities, then how do these words fit together? Or are air strikes against such objects (if there are any objects at all) not dangerous, unlike the objects themselves?

The material contains a statement by University Professor Tel Aviv Eyal Tsisser, who says the following:

The Syrian regime continues to develop chemical weapons.

The material announced that the program allegedly continues to operate "with the tacit consent of Russia."

From an article with a link already to an unnamed source:

In Syria, nothing happens without the consent of Moscow.

In all likelihood, asking about evidence of Damascus’s chemical weapons remains meaningless. If the answer is received, it will be in the style of "evidence is there, but they are secret."
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

94 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Lopatov April 1 2020 16: 07 New
    • 55
    • 1
    +54
    There is no sign of Israeli experts wanting to give up lies.
    1. Sky strike fighter April 1 2020 16: 19 New
      • 11
      • 2
      +9
      Yes, even if Assad would have remained, who in his position would have given up chemical weapons? What is no guarantee of security from the "peace-loving" neighbors.
      1. Lopatov April 1 2020 16: 21 New
        • 11
        • 3
        +8
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Yes, even if Assad would have remained, who in his position would have abandoned chemical weapons?

        Well, he refused, foolishly decided that this would stop the gopniks.
        It turned out the other way around ...
        It is a pity that Russia took part in this.
        1. PSih2097 April 1 2020 19: 27 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Spade
          so he refused, foolishly decided that this would stop the gopniks.
          It turned out the other way around ...
          It is a pity that Russia took part in this.

          And what to restore for a long time? in the presence of components?
          1. Tatyana April 1 2020 19: 40 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: Spade
            There is no sign of Israeli experts wanting to give up lies.

            But what is there to say something, for even without this Israel’s policy on the BV has long been known!

            1. Shurik70 April 1 2020 21: 24 New
              • 6
              • 1
              +5
              In Syria, nothing happens without the consent of Moscow

              I believe that nothing happens in the media in Israel itself without the knowledge of Netanyahu.
              If such an outright lie is launched, then it is worth waiting for massive attacks on Syria.
      2. military_cat April 1 2020 16: 26 New
        • 16
        • 7
        +9
        In all likelihood, asking about evidence of Damascus’s chemical weapons remains meaningless.

        When the United States imposed sanctions against Rosneft for operating in Venezuela, Rosneft also asked for evidence in press releases. And recently, it simply announced that it had sold its Venezuelan assets (for money from the Russian budget, by the way) and is counting on lifting sanctions.

        If you are wondering why nobody has taken seriously the questions of evidence for a long time, that’s why.
        1. orionvitt April 1 2020 18: 37 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          Quote: military_cat
          When the US imposed sanctions against Rosneft for activities in Venezuela

          Activities in Venezuela, is this a crime? Rosneft did not do anything illegal in Venezuela, even from the point of view of American laws. Simply, if the states need to impose sanctions on someone, they will be imposed. Do not wash like skating.
          1. military_cat April 1 2020 18: 54 New
            • 2
            • 10
            -8
            Quote: orionvitt
            Simply, if the states need to impose sanctions on someone, they will be imposed. Do not wash like skating.

            Sanctions were lifted from Rusal after the conditions for lifting were met. All these conversations - "sanctions will be imposed anyway, no matter what" - they are for ordinary people. And decision makers, as we see, do not believe in these conversations, because they do what is required of them. What Rusal, what Rosneft.
            1. orionvitt April 1 2020 19: 01 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              Quote: military_cat
              because they do what is demanded of them.

              So in your opinion, you need to do everything that is ordered from Washington? Is that your understanding of the question?
              1. military_cat April 1 2020 19: 08 New
                • 4
                • 6
                -2
                No. Sanctions are the proposed choice, "either you play by our rules, or you play by your own rules, but then we don’t play." This is what they choose from. It depends. When one option, when another.

                At the same time, they broadcast through the media the idea of ​​“there is no choice” so that the audience wonders less whether she likes the choice made, whether it suits her interests, whether she supports him or not. Very convenient manipulation.
            2. NordUral April 1 2020 19: 20 New
              • 4
              • 4
              0
              Sanctions were lifted from Rusal after the conditions for lifting were met.

              Yes, he performed the Deripaska - Russian aluminum became foreign.
              1. Lopatov April 1 2020 19: 24 New
                • 3
                • 4
                -1
                Quote: NordUral
                Russian aluminum has become foreign.

                Oddly enough, but vice versa.
                After all this, Russian aluminum became more Russian.
                1. NordUral April 1 2020 19: 25 New
                  • 3
                  • 4
                  -1
                  Shovels, but in more detail or a link about highly Russified aluminum?
                  1. Lopatov April 1 2020 20: 15 New
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    -2
                    Quote: NordUral
                    Shovels, but in more detail or a link about highly Russified aluminum?

                    Previously, the island of Jersey, now (since 2019) re-registered in the "special administrative region" in the Kaliningrad region

                    So it goes.
                    "There would be no happiness, but misfortune helped"

                    In general, it was strange: okay aluminum. the only Russian manufacturer of wheeled armored vehicles was wholly owned by a company registered in the British offshore ...
                    1. NordUral April 1 2020 20: 31 New
                      • 2
                      • 5
                      -3
                      Yesterday, the US Treasury lifted sanctions from Rusal, the main producer of aluminum and alumina in Russia, one of the largest in the world. Has Washington replaced anger with mercy and begun to abandon the policy of sanctions?

                      No, everything is much simpler and sadder - Oleg Deripaska transferred control of Rusal to the United States, the enterprise essentially became American, and the United States quite naturally lifted the sanctions on the asset that transferred to them.

                      What does this mean for Russia?

                      Aluminum is the most important metal, raw material for the aviation, electrical, automotive and other industries, including defense.

                      The Krasnoyarsk aluminum smelter produces about 1 million tons of aluminum per year - this is about 25% of all Russian aluminum. The brotherly aluminum, which is also part of Rusal, is almost the same. Thus, Rusal produces 50% of all Russian aluminum.

                      But there is another important point - the Krasnoyarsk plant (KrAZ) has the highest profitability in the world, which is due primarily to the low cost of electricity received from a specially built hydroelectric station for this plant.

                      With the price of aluminum on world exchanges of about $ 2000 per tonne, KrAZ alone generates income of two billion dollars annually, and since the plant has high profitability, a significant part of this income is net profit.

                      This, in fact, is the source of Deripaska's enormous fortune that arose in a few years. And the administration of Putin helped get Rusal Deripaska at one time.

                      And now, now Deripaska transferred a controlling stake in Rusal to the US Federal Treasury.

                      Why did Oleg Vladimirovich decide to part with a controlling stake in such a profitable asset and why he gave it to the Americans?

                      This was done so that the United States lifted sanctions and left Rusal part of its market.

                      The fact is that in Russia, aluminum consumption has fallen dramatically. Over the past 28 years, industrial production has fallen dramatically in the country, and a huge number of plants, which were consumers of aluminum, have closed. The restoration of production, import substitution and other rising from their knees - all this is just television propaganda, in reality there is no restoration of production in Russia, on the contrary, it continues to decline, simplify, switch to imported components and screwdriver assembly. Therefore, aluminum consumption in Russia continues to fall and this end-to-edge can not be seen.

                      Therefore, Deripaska also gave the Americans a controlling stake, for the sake of lifting sanctions and access to the American market for aluminum. At the same time, Deripaska himself remained a good share - 35%, so he will not be poor. For the sake of this, he actually went to a deal.

                      In fairness, I must say that the Rusal holding (in European - En +) was registered in Switzerland from the very beginning and therefore has never been truly Russian. But since yesterday, Rusal has ceased to be Russian at all - by decision of the new owner of a controlling stake (US Treasury), half of the board of directors should have US / UK citizenship, most should be independent of Deripaska and Russia.

                      The world's largest and most profitable aluminum producer came under the control not of the Swiss or Germans, with whom Russia has more or less decent business relations, but under the control of the United States - Russia's strategic adversary.

                      And now, controlling Rusal, the United States can indirectly influence Russian shipbuilding, aircraft manufacturing and the military industry, which depend on aluminum supplies.

                      We often say on television how the best president in the world defends the independence and sovereignty of Russia with all his might. Rusal's transition to US control is a great demonstration of how this is done in practice. A little less than nothing.

                      First, the Putin administration helped Deripaska get Rusal at its disposal, and now the Kremlin silently agreed to transferring strategically important production to the Americans, one might even say the whole industry of the Russian economy.

                      The reason for the Kremlin’s silence regarding the transfer of Rusal to US control is very simple - a small share of the shares will be transferred to VTB Bank. This is a handout or it’s more correct to even say a bribe to the Kremlin so that it does not try to challenge the deal.

                      And on TV we will again be told about the independence and rights of Russia, which are defended by the best president in the world.

                      And the president himself will talk about missiles that can overcome missile defense systems and other vigorous loaves.

                      It’s just that the production of all these missiles now depends heavily on whether the Americans will regularly ship aluminum to Rostec enterprises. If they ship aluminum, then Putin will have rockets. And if they don’t, then after a while there will be no missiles.
                      1. Lopatov April 1 2020 21: 36 New
                        • 0
                        • 2
                        -2
                        Everything written, of course, is interesting, but the fact remains. who wrote this is completely off topic. Although, of course, pathetic ....

                        You just figure it out for yourself.

                        For to trust the author who wrote the Rusal holding (in European - En +) "is still not worth it. You will not believe whoever writes "Moscow Military District, in European style - the Ministry of Defense of the Soviet Union 8)))

                        I am ashamed of the authors who so frankly spit on their readers.
                      2. NordUral April 2 2020 12: 16 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        I am ashamed of the authors,
                        Do not be so tormented, Shovels!
                        Here is the link and the final conclusion on the situation:
                        https://yandex.ru/turbo?text=https%3A%2F%2Ftsargrad.tv%2Farticles%2Fssha-zahvatyvajut-rossijskuju-jenergetiku-i-aljuminij-chinovniki-molchat_237766
                        The result was predictable: control in En + passed to Barker and the proteges of the US Treasury. Of the 12 members of the board of directors, Deripaska has the right to nominate only four. Of the remaining eight members, six should be US and UK citizens. Two more, as well as the entire composition, must be agreed with the US Treasury.
            3. military_cat April 1 2020 19: 30 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: NordUral
              Russian aluminum has become foreign

              Correction - Deripaska aluminum. It is strange to mentally associate yourself with a large capitalist-private owner, especially having such an avatar.
              1. Mordvin 3 April 1 2020 19: 35 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: military_cat
                It’s strange to mentally associate yourself with a large capitalist-private owner,

                We had one such. Victor Palych. He was immediately called an antibiotic. He destroyed the whole plant.
              2. NordUral April 1 2020 20: 06 New
                • 2
                • 2
                0
                What do you accept, military_cat, that you carry this nonsense with an association? For me, the industry of Russia is ours (this type was temporarily used by it), but the deripaska gave it to the West and getting it back is either problematic or impossible now. Like much more, which is no longer ours.
                1. military_cat April 1 2020 20: 34 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  Quote: NordUral
                  For me, the Russian industry is ours (this type was temporarily used by it)
                  I will not argue, everyone has the right to his own imaginary world.
                  1. NordUral April 1 2020 20: 37 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    So live in it, and time will put everything in its place.
                2. Cottodraton April 1 2020 21: 25 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  Deripaska gave VTB shares. From this, the state’s share has grown.
                  And the United States already owned a solid asset. With their maneuvers, they tried to squeeze the aluminum from Deripaska, removing him and planting the type of their managers, but Deripaska did not give them a share, as they expected ...
                  In fact, Deripaska was transferred to the category of spectators.
                  The main owner remained the Russian Federation. The only thing that the United States can only predict the direction of development of RusAL and how much aluminum is going at the expense of its managers. Well, to receive part of the profit ... Actually, everything
                  1. NordUral April 1 2020 21: 27 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Facts on stage, please.
                  2. NordUral April 2 2020 12: 18 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    The only thing that the United States can only predict the direction of development of RusAL and how much aluminum is going at the expense of its managers. Well, to receive part of the profit ... Actually, everything


                    Cute little thing?
        2. venik April 1 2020 19: 54 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: orionvitt
          Simply, if the states need to impose sanctions on someone, they will be imposed. Do not wash like skating.

          =======
          good "... He is to blame only for the fact that hungry was me! ... " drinks
      3. Dart April 1 2020 19: 01 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        "And just recently announced that it had sold its Venezuelan assets (for money from the Russian budget, by the way)"
        So I didn’t sell it to the side, but I parked it for my own Russian companies ... so to speak.
    2. svp67 April 1 2020 16: 36 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Sky Strike fighter
      What none, but a guarantee of security from the "peace-loving" neighbors.

      In this particular case, NOT ANYTHING. All that they could produce could of course be called BOB, but they could not be compared with what Israel itself could produce. And most importantly, delivery vehicles. With this, the Syrians are very tight ..
      1. Polite Moose April 1 2020 17: 55 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: svp67
        In this particular case, NOT ANYTHING.

        I completely agree. XO - sucks. Today, anyone with a TV, a person knows that it is possible to neutralize the effect of BOV by simply watering the victim with water from a hose and injecting some crap out of the inhaler. But the message about Assad’s possession of bacteriological weapons may well ensure a shortage of toilet paper for all neighbors.
    3. rich April 1 2020 16: 37 New
      • 10
      • 1
      +9
      Israel’s extreme concern is that even a few grams of the filling of such weapons can do great harm, killing people.

      But the fact that striking the IDF’s air force kills civilians does not cause Israeli concern?
  2. 4ekist April 1 2020 16: 27 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    ... We will continue to strike as intelligence is obtained.
    ... The Syrian regime continues to develop chemical weapons.
    It can be stated as follows:
    The Israeli regime continues to develop nuclear weapons, in violation of the resolution on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. Who will say that this is not so.
    1. Avior April 1 2020 17: 37 New
      • 2
      • 7
      -5
      This is not entirely true.
      Not a resolution, but an agreement
      Israel, India and Pakistan have not signed a non-proliferation treaty.
  3. Incvizitor April 1 2020 17: 45 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    C'mon, the "British scientists" have proved that the "Israeli experts" never lie.
  4. major147 April 1 2020 19: 09 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Spade
    No sign

    I see no signs of Israel abandoning nuclear weapons. Could missions be missed upon receipt of intelligence?
  • Operator April 1 2020 16: 12 New
    • 13
    • 3
    +10
    Syria must not allow Israel to store and produce nuclear weapons - by striking at a nuclear reactor in Dimona.
    1. Lopatov April 1 2020 16: 20 New
      • 15
      • 0
      +15
      Quote: Operator
      prevent Israel from storing and producing nuclear weapons

      And also chemical and biological.
      Israel is confident that it has the right to produce them.

      Therefore, they did not even sign the Biological Weapons Convention, and they have not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention for 27 years.
  • Victor_B April 1 2020 16: 16 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    There is no sign of Assad's desire to abandon chemical weapons
    , which, under the control of the Americans, gave them ALL stockpiles of chemical weapons and which they themselves destroyed.
    Israeli experts at Breaking Defense
    The dog breres - the wind wears!
    In all likelihood, asking about evidence of Damascus’s chemical weapons remains meaningless. If the answer is received, it will be in the style of "evidence exists, but they are secret."
    A modern, correct, sufficiency condition - HILE-LIKE!
    That's it!
    1. svp67 April 1 2020 16: 32 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Victor_B
      which, under the control of the Americans, gave them ALL stockpiles of chemical weapons and which they themselves destroyed.

      And Obama, I remember for this, received the Nobel Peace Prize. Do you think he will return it now?
      1. Victor_B April 1 2020 16: 40 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: svp67
        And Obama, I remember for this, received the Nobel Peace Prize.

        He did not get it.
        Received for being the first Negro president.
        At the time of receipt, he did not have any merits at all.
        Just given an ADVANCE.
        Like, a Negro will definitely be a peacemaker.
        So he did!
        Of the world.
        In the world.
        1. svp67 April 1 2020 16: 56 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Victor_B
          So he did!
          Of the world.
          In the world.

          So will return or not. Will conscience leap?
        2. 4ekist April 1 2020 17: 20 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          The limit of blacks-presidents of the United States in this century has been exhausted. Now, at best, from among the Sioux Indians.
          1. Rzzz April 2 2020 09: 55 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            There were no women presidents (they almost chose in 2016), gay presidents (candidate for the next election), transgender preziks and other non-standard creatures.
            So the Nobel party needs to prepare grandmas and good explanations for motivation upfront for the future.
  • knn54 April 1 2020 16: 18 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    For a long time, however, they "thought".
    What can you do when not only finance, but also the media in the hands (and in the Russian Federation is no exception) of the "chosen ones".
  • boris epstein April 1 2020 16: 19 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    But nothing that Russian ships exported chemical weapons from Syria under the control of US experts?
    1. 4ekist April 1 2020 16: 31 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Which experts? This page is upside down and forgot about it.
      1. boris epstein April 1 2020 16: 33 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Although he is upside down, Assad does not have chemical weapons, and it is impossible to argue with this.
  • JD1979 April 1 2020 16: 29 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Jewish experts have fallen to the level of British scientists, the next step is the level of the Ukrainian military.
  • V.I.P. April 1 2020 16: 29 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    And "with the tacit consent of Russia." Israel constantly carries out rocket attacks on a neighboring state with which it is not at war. )))))) .. It is a pity that Russia cannot afford to bomb Warsaw, Kiev, etc. After all, any reason can be invented, the example of Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Syria))).
  • rocket757 April 1 2020 16: 32 New
    • 8
    • 1
    +7
    I do not like to touch ... substance, Schaub did not stink. but in this particular case itself, itself.
    It is clear that they don’t want to allow the restoration of peaceful life in a neighboring country, and for them all methods are good.
    Just the fear that sooner or later they will be presented with the final score.
  • ximkim April 1 2020 16: 34 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    [/ quote] In all likelihood, asking about evidence that Damascus has chemical weapons left is pointless. If the answer is received, it will be in the style of "evidence is there, but they are secret" [quote]
    To a point. Publishing needs circulation, but there’s nothing better than material from a statement by an unnamed representative of the Ministry of Defense lol
  • ultra April 1 2020 16: 40 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    The time has come for fantastic stories from Israel. wassat
  • PalBor April 1 2020 16: 48 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6

    Nothing, the Hussites have already entered the Saudi province of Jizan. Then the prince will be overthrown ... And they will reach Israel ...
  • Chief Engineer April 1 2020 16: 50 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    It's simple, if the Israeli comrades are right, then let them show evidence, and this is an idle chatter to protect their interests.
  • Vasyan1971 April 1 2020 16: 54 New
    • 8
    • 1
    +7
    "Israel will not allow the Syrian regime to store and produce chemical weapons."

    Yeah. The same thing was said about Iraq in the USA.
    It is extremely worrying that even a few grams of the filling of such weapons can do huge harm, killing people.

    Test tube in the studio!
  • yuliatreb April 1 2020 16: 55 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Such experts for one expert place, and museums to drag the Syrian Arab Republic and show what they and their minions have done there.
  • Sergey Averchenkov April 1 2020 16: 56 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Test tube not yet shaken? Not? Well then, I'll go take a nap.
  • Professor April 1 2020 16: 57 New
    • 5
    • 14
    -9
    Asad is known that always denied the presence of weapons of mass destruction, and here, suddenly, “experts” declare about a thousand tons of OM. Who to believe? Of course I want to believe an ophthalmologist, but how then did they destroy non-existent weapons on ships at sea? request
    1. Serwid April 1 2020 17: 14 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Professor
      Asad is known, always denied the presence of weapons of mass destruction, and here, suddenly, "experts" declare about a thousand tons of OM

      Well, what a fool you turn on. For what then the OPCW received the 13th Nobel Prize. And when Syria denied the presence of chemical weapons.
      1. Professor April 1 2020 17: 18 New
        • 4
        • 13
        -9
        Quote: Serwid
        Quote: Professor
        Asad is known, always denied the presence of weapons of mass destruction, and here, suddenly, "experts" declare about a thousand tons of OM

        Well, what a fool you turn on. For what then the OPCW received the 13th Nobel Prize. And when Syria denied the presence of chemical weapons.

        Quote: Serwid
        And when Syria denied the presence of chemical weapons.

        Always have not been caught by the hand in its application.

        Quote: cniza
        Oleg, you are a smart person, answer the question - why is Assad this?

        What is it"?
    2. cniza April 1 2020 17: 16 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Oleg, you are a smart person, answer the question - why is Assad this?
    3. Tusv April 1 2020 17: 29 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      There was such a movie. Where in Iraq a whole elite unit dug up the whole of Iraq in search of WMD. The main character, an evil general, was found and began to save. What is the result? total speech: "No one will believe us anymore."
      What am I talking about? Who to believe ???? The main character in that film or that WMD exists in Iraq or Syria
      1. Professor April 1 2020 17: 33 New
        • 1
        • 8
        -7
        Quote: Tusv
        There was such a movie. Where in Iraq a whole elite unit dug up the whole of Iraq in search of WMD. The main character, an evil general, was found and began to save. What is the result? total speech: "No one will believe us anymore."
        What am I talking about? Who to believe ???? The main character in that film or that WMD exists in Iraq or Syria
        1. Tusv April 1 2020 17: 36 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Sokolov Oleg. You just quoted me, I don’t see an answer
          1. Professor April 1 2020 18: 43 New
            • 3
            • 10
            -7
            Quote: Tusv
            Sokolov Oleg. You just quoted me, I don’t see an answer

            1. There were WMDs in Iraq and he used WMDs. It is a fact.
            2. WMD in Syria was and is and it used WMD. It is a fact.
            1. fk7777777 April 1 2020 19: 38 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              The mariarchy of religious gopniks has nuclear, and they deny this, this is a fact. So now bring down this pack of people living according to demonic commandments ... After all, the fact is clear ...
            2. Den717 April 1 2020 19: 55 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: Professor
              WMD in Syria was and is and it used WMD. It is a fact.

              This is not a fact; it is your excuses and faith. Belief in cover in someone else's fly. Look, do not be fooled ... If you (not you personally, but in general ...) again begin to slowly "oppress" in secluded corners, I will probably not hurry with regret and help in a hurry. You are worthy of third-party “teachings”.
            3. Tusv April 1 2020 20: 12 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Professor
              1. There were WMDs in Iraq and he used WMDs. It is a fact.
              2. WMD in Syria was and is and it used WMD. It is a fact.

              In the same film, when the main character found a general - a villain, in Saudi Arabia. The villain general said: "There was a WMD - but we destroyed it."
              1. Avior April 1 2020 20: 58 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/1508402
                https://www.newsru.com/world/15oct2014/him.html
                https://tjournal.ru/stories/107391-zabytye-poteri-pochemu-pentagon-godami-ignoriroval-amerikanskih-soldat-stavshih-zhertvami-himicheskogo-oruzhiya-v-irake
                hi
              2. Professor April 2 2020 08: 05 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Tusv
                to thaw
                Quote
                A complaint

                In feature films, this does not happen. Nevertheless, the facts of the use by the regimes of Saddam and Assad WMD on the face.

                Quote: smile
                Professor
                Hello.
                Our prosident at one time guaranteed the destruction of the remnants of Syria’s chemical weapons .... yeah, we didn’t post them and didn’t “help us” them in production .... Strange selling gang of OPCW, not much different from VA

                And who does YOU blame for the creation of WMD by the Arabs? Assad was and is at Assad despite your presence in Syria.
                1. Tusv April 2 2020 08: 26 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Professor
                  In feature films, this does not happen. Nevertheless, the facts of the use by the regimes of Saddam and Assad WMD on the face.

                  Damn, I can’t find the word “tit” in my comments. Did you answer me exactly? recourse
                  But still. Where is that face? Show. The Americans, with all their fifty heels, beat themselves in the chest, that Assad's chemical weapons were taken away and destroyed. Someone even received the Nobel Prize for this. But it turns out that? The unworthy democrats only got grandmothers, and chemical weapons left Assad? Not well, I like this scheme. Let's turn such a chip and destroy chemical weapons in Israel. Yes, I don’t care if it is or not, the main thing is grandmas on my bank account
                  1. Professor April 2 2020 08: 56 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Tusv
                    But still. Where is that face? Show. The Americans, with all their fifty heels, beat themselves in the chest, that Assad's chemical weapons were taken away and destroyed. Someone even received the Nobel Prize for this. But it turns out that?

                    Americans have never claimed 100% destroyed weapons. Check it out.

                    Quote: Tusv
                    The unworthy democrats only got grandmothers, and chemical weapons left Assad? Not well, I like this scheme. Let's turn such a chip and destroy chemical weapons in Israel. Yes, I don’t care if it is or not, the main thing is grandmas on my bank account

                    I understood your train of thought. However, no one can guarantee that the ophthalmologist does not have a WMD. Even sun-faced.
                    1. Tusv April 2 2020 09: 03 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Professor
                      Americans have never claimed 100% weapons destroyed. Check it out.

                      That is, they took up the tug, Our specialists were sent to their homeland. and failed? Blame the N factorial
                      However, no one can guarantee that the ophthalmologist does not have a WMD. Even sun-faced.

                      I agree. Every man has a wife with WMD. "Brain removal" is called laughing
                      1. Professor April 2 2020 09: 19 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Tusv
                        That is, they took up the tug, Our specialists were sent to their homeland. and failed? Blame the N factorial

                        Not sure what the "blame." Destroy 100% WMD is an impossible task and it was not set.

                        Quote: Tusv
                        I agree. Every man has a wife with WMD. "Brain removal" is called

                        No. Although it’s not a conventional weapon, it’s not OhМAP wink
    4. smile April 2 2020 02: 01 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Professor
      Hello.
      Our prosident at one time guaranteed the destruction of the remnants of Syria’s chemical weapons .... yeah, we didn’t post them and didn’t “help us” them in production .... Strange selling gang of OPCW, not much different from VA
  • Lord of the Sith April 1 2020 16: 58 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    Jewish hutspa drove up with the filing of "Western partners."
  • The comment was deleted.
  • cniza April 1 2020 17: 14 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    We will continue to strike as intelligence is obtained.


    And they didn’t try to present evidence, or "we know ..."
  • Tank jacket April 1 2020 17: 20 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    Bah, Israel now opposed the OPCW Commission?
    On June 23, 2014, it was announced that the last shipment of chemical weapons was removed from Syria for subsequent destruction [1]. On January 4, 2016, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) announced the complete destruction of Syria's chemical weapons. The head of the OPCW, Ahmet Uzumju, said the last 75 cylinders of hydrogen fluoride were recycled in Texas. Thus, the process of destruction of the Syrian chemical weapons was completed.
  • akarfoxhound April 1 2020 17: 22 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    There is no sign of Jews refusing to bomb Syria! And even if there is no reason - then they are! Well, itchy, itchy, no urine
  • Rambam April 1 2020 17: 34 New
    • 1
    • 8
    -7
    Another tale from the nameless author VO
  • Radikal April 1 2020 18: 16 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Spade
    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    Yes, even if Assad would have remained, who in his position would have abandoned chemical weapons?

    Well, he refused, foolishly decided that this would stop the gopniks.
    It turned out the other way around ...
    It is a pity that Russia took part in this.

    She didn’t just take part - it was she who “advised” Assad to do this. But who asked her about it is an interesting question .... lol
  • Astra wild April 1 2020 18: 31 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "mode still stores part of the chemical weapons" continue the "white helmets" business? Honestly, I don’t understand the Jew: smart, hardworking people, and why the hell are they writing fairy tales about chemical weapons.? “White helmets” even paid and they did well done money, who pays Israel?
  • Vasya Zyuzkin April 1 2020 18: 41 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    This is so the Hebrews again on foot travel to go to world attractions for a couple of thousand years. Look how points on BV stubbornly earn. Benny started to get bored of Russia by the Kremlin. He is missing the GDP in place of an indefinite loan to the Syrians and Iranians who should give some launches. Ache Jews with minke whales can supply barmaley, and we that red? Especially for a good cause!
  • Dart April 1 2020 19: 06 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: cniza
    Oleg, you are a smart person

    In vain you cheated on him, you really shouldn’t. His comments were more or less smart ten years ago ... now it’s just diarrhea.
  • fk7777777 April 1 2020 19: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Here is the true face of the matriarchal religious gopniks.
  • 75 Sergey April 1 2020 19: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Nothing new...
    It’s your fault that I want to eat!
  • Den717 April 1 2020 19: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Israel personifies the Middle East policy of the United States. Diligently begs for a retaliatory strike on its territory, in the hope that the United States will hide from any answer. Then again they will cry about the Holocaust 2.0. A worrying nation ... What doesn’t they live in peace? Did you want another stranger? I can’t imagine what to blame Iran for if it slams this hotbed of conflicts in the territory of BV? People will, of course, feel sorry, but it is they who choose their leaders with an awl in the ass. Arabs, of course, are also not angels in the flesh, but why deliberately provoke them, provoke them to bloodthirsty thoughts?
  • Cottodraton April 1 2020 21: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There is no reason to trust the "experts" from Israel ..
  • l.jensen April 2 2020 00: 34 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Gentlemen, I am a stranger, have never been to Russia and are not going to. I’m watching your site and thought you had a connection with Israel and the Jews? A lot of Jewry and Israel on your site. Does anyone explain? No such resource in Europe has such a Jewish presence.
    1. Sergey Medvedev April 2 2020 06: 22 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: l.Jensen
      Does anyone explain?

      Hey. We have no more ties with Israel than with other countries. But here the Soviet Jews who left for Israel, can not leave completely.
  • Kerensky April 2 2020 03: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    From I love "chemical gunners"! I repeat: EGDN and dioxin are difficult to weld? No. The question is one barmaley and a couple of days of time.
    People still do not understand what danger they live in ....
    PS Even if it is just diligent acid ..
  • KCA
    KCA April 2 2020 05: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Aha, Russia was the guarantor of destruction, they controlled and destroyed the RKhBZ troops, and who was lit up here as the savior of Geyropa? RCHBZ? Catch the poop, denyushka, unlike, doesn't smell
  • ZVS
    ZVS April 2 2020 11: 44 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Let Jewish experts say why Israel does not give up nuclear weapons, and then they climb into the arsenals of other countries. Assad would have had nuclear weapons, then he did not need other weapons of mass destruction for the country.
    It is surprising that the Jews are ready to slander anyone, if that is their interest. This is a nation that has no principles, but only greed.
  • Shadow041 April 2 2020 12: 57 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Trying to destroy Syria, Israel is digging a grave for itself. Having a common border with Turkey, Israel will receive a global problem !!!