How the oil price has changed in different years: dynamics from the beginning of the 80s to the present day

How the oil price has changed in different years: dynamics from the beginning of the 80s to the present day

Today, when for the Russians news about the dynamics of the cost of "black gold" are no less relevant than the news from the world coronavirus "front", many analysts in search of an answer to the question about the causes and duration of the current price crisis in energy markets turn to the experience of past years. Well, there really can be some clues.


First of all, it is worth recalling that it is possible to talk about any oil pricing as such starting from the 70s of the twentieth century. That is, from the collapse of the monopoly on the extraction and sale of energy from the notorious "Seven Sisters" (the largest multinational corporations, which until then fully controlled the industry and the market), as well as the emergence of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). A considerable degree of more flexible pricing policy was facilitated by the appearance in 1983 of oil futures on world commodity exchanges, which determined the impact on the cost of energy carriers of the financial market.

What has happened to the cost of an oil barrel over the past forty years and why? The peak of its first growth stage, "black gold" reached by 1980, having exceeded the price of $ 35 per barrel. After 1973 there was a fantastic climb. In addition to the above-mentioned changes in the market itself, several political events in the Middle East contributed to this: the anti-Shah revolution in Iran and the ensuing Iran-Iraq war. In addition, in retaliation for West support in the Doomsday War of Israel, the Arab countries tried to block the flow of “black gold” to their maximum.

At the same time, everyone rushed to extract oil - including countries that had not previously thought about it. Norway and Britain begin drilling the shelf of the North Sea, Mexico - the development of the huge Kantarel field. At the same time, the Soviet Union closely began to exploit the oil deposits of Western Siberia. Not surprisingly, by 1980, supply in the oil markets began to exceed demand. It is quite natural that the barrel went down, and more rapidly. The first global “collapse” of value occurred in 1986 - and precisely because of overproduction.

From 1987 to 1999, the oil price was below $ 20 per barrel with slight fluctuations. Especially accelerated "glide" down after the defeat of Iraq by the Americans in 1991. The Asian economic crisis also made itself felt. As a result, in 1998 the cost of a barrel reached $ 12.

The consequences in the form of "default", most Russians felt for themselves. A return to figures resembling the previous price began in 2000. The reason was the new economic recovery of the Asia-Pacific region, primarily China. However, the price tag of $ 35 per barrel "black gold" crossed only in 2004, starting a rapid and steady growth.

Historical for oil prices, the boundary of $ 100 per barrel was overcome in 2008. In the United States, a mortgage crisis began, which later grew into a global one. Initially, this gave the commodity markets an impetus for rapid growth, but by the end of that year, a global recession had begun, affecting them, of course, in the most detrimental way. The end of the year, energy markets met a four-year low of prices; a barrel of oil produced just over $ 40. By next year, its value returned to 60 with a small dollar.

The golden time for oil industry workers was 2011-2013. Libya, which occupied a considerable share of the market, was almost wiped off the face of the earth in order to “establish democracy,” the “Arab spring” was burning in the Middle East, and the tireless Chinese comrades, creating their own economic miracle, demanded more and more energy. The price of "black gold" steadily held above hundreds of dollars per barrel until 2014, when another recession occurred.

Who's guilty? There are several reasons. These are the Americans who “jumped out” with their shale oil, and the slowdown in the economy of the Celestial Empire, and the global drop in demand for energy resources, and the prolonged reluctance of market participants (the same OPEC) to reduce production.

All of this taken together led to the fact that already in 2015, the barrel again fell in price by half. The current, called by some people disastrous price of $ 30 a barrel already reached in early 2016. Then he slowly returned to 40 and slowly began to “climb” higher, adding in 2017 from 56 to 64 dollars, and in 2018-2019 he confidently gained a foothold in the price range of 60-70 dollars per barrel. And then the year 2020 came ...

Those who are inclined to blame for the collapse of energy prices that are happening now are solely the intransigence of our country, either deeply mistaken or deliberately misleading. An epidemic of a coronavirus with an almost complete cessation of air traffic, isolation of countries, shutdown of enterprises, and other related problems would have completely unavoidably collapsed. What to do now? Wait. And to hope that behind the global crisis, no matter how fierce and comprehensive it may be, a new rise will inevitably come. Including for the oil markets.
Author:
Photos used:
Rosneft website
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Yehudi Menuhin 27 March 2020 09: 50 New
    • 7
    • 10
    -3
    Listen to Slepakov. Exhaustively about oil
    1. Machito 27 March 2020 12: 07 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      It would be interesting to compare oil and gasoline price charts in Russia since 1980. And then oil is getting cheaper, and gas is getting more expensive.
      Parodox.
      1. Ros 56 27 March 2020 12: 53 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        It’s not just a paradox, it’s a clinic and it’s time for these oil refiners to go by the legs and angle, they can start thinking.
      2. knn54 27 March 2020 13: 13 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1
        Парадокса нет-дешевеет нефть,но растет доллар.ВСЕ к нему привязано.
        1. maidan.izrailovich 27 March 2020 14: 57 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          There is no paradox - oil is getting cheaper, but the dollar is growing. EVERYTHING is attached to it.

          Нельзя с такими умными фразами на митинг приходить. Народу сия грамота не знакома. Не поймут. Побить могут. laughing
        2. Machito 27 March 2020 16: 06 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          That's right, in Russia the price of gasoline does not depend on the price of oil, but depends on the dollar. Russian gasoline is not made from oil, but from dollars. The ruble exchange rate depends on the price of oil, but with an increase in the price of oil, the ruble does not grow. Economic anomaly. Black hole. The Nobel Prize in economics pulls. Paradox.
          Why are prices never reduced in Russia?
          1. Sling cutter 27 March 2020 20: 33 New
            • 7
            • 2
            +5
            Quote: Bearded
            Why are prices never reduced in Russia?

            For this, say thanks to Putinism.
          2. Zoldat_A 29 March 2020 07: 37 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Bearded
            in Russia, the price of gasoline does not depend on the price of oil, but depends on the dollar.

            In Russia, the price of gasoline does not depend on the price of oil, nor on the dollar, ANYTHING does not depend on anything.
            She's just growing. When faster, when slower, but just growing.

            Those who manage to explain it intelligently-deserve the Nobel Prize in economics. Only no one will be able to, because no one has managed to push the greedy greed into any economic formula.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Zoldat_A 29 March 2020 08: 04 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Boltunov
                for a profit of 200%, the capitalists are ready to sell their mother, if only to achieve this ..

                Thomas J. Dunning, XNUMXth century English unionist. K. Marx quoted in Capital quoted, but he is mistakenly credited with:
                ... once sufficient profits are available, capital becomes bold. Provide 10 percent, and the capital agrees to any use, at 20 percent it becomes lively, at 50 percent it is positively ready to break its head, at 100 percent it violates all human laws, at 300 percent there is no crime that he would not risk, at least under pain of the gallows.
                1. Boltunov 29 March 2020 09: 54 New
                  • 2
                  • 3
                  -1
                  Quote: Zoldat_A
                  Thomas J. Dunning, XNUMXth century English unionist. K. Marx quoted in Capital quoted, but he is mistakenly credited with:

                  Спасибо Солдат ,точно Это ! Но я вам не буду ответ писать и мнение свое ..Таких .как я тут удаляют ,слишком я им тут неугоден .. soldier But I don’t take offense at them and I feel good at heart .. I beat them here pointwise and how angry they are and threaten me .. God is their judge! wink
  2. Svarog 27 March 2020 09: 51 New
    • 14
    • 9
    +5
    Our country is "developing" strictly in the wake of oil quotes ..
    Who's guilty? There are several reasons. These are the Americans who “jumped out” with their shale oil, and the slowdown in the economy of the Celestial Empire, and the global drop in demand for energy resources, and the prolonged reluctance of market participants (the same OPEC) to reduce production.

    There will always be someone to blame .. But in my understanding, the reason is not oil prices to be sought, but the development of production in Russia
    1. Lannan Shi 27 March 2020 10: 04 New
      • 19
      • 7
      +12
      Quote: Svarog
      Who is to blame?

      Those who are building a single-resource economy. In the last century, there was even a definition - a banana republic, and it is far from necessary that bananas were grown there. The main thing is the almost complete dependence of the country on demand and prices for one type of product. Goods of low redistribution. None of the banana republics did well. If you look at the perspective of half a century, at least, and not a segment of 5-10 years. That's just 5-10, or even 15 years, a banana republic can bloom and smell. Thanks to successful market conditions and rush demand. But ... It seems that the government of one country, we won’t poke a finger exactly which, the whole government, in a crowd, according to history, has ratings in the range from 0 to 1. For dancing on a rake. on which a third of the world has already walked ... It’s not even talent, it’s talent .... And when some people, again we won’t poke a finger, spoke of a great energy power, I wanted to send him to school so that they would tell on historical examples of the great banana republics.
      1. Okolotochny 27 March 2020 12: 21 New
        • 7
        • 12
        -5
        Those who are building a single-resource economy.

        So it has already been, since the days of the USSR. The main foreign exchange earnings were precisely from the export of natural resources and raw materials.
        1. Lannan Shi 27 March 2020 12: 51 New
          • 11
          • 4
          +7
          Quote: Okolotochny
          So it has already been, since the days of the USSR. The main foreign exchange earnings were precisely from the export of natural resources and raw materials.

          Pan overseer, but your mother didn’t teach you in childhood, what is wrong to lie?
          In 1986, the USSR exported no kopecks of 70 yards of foreign currency. And oil exports, even in the "golden" years, were around 15. Some of the tractors of the USSR were exported 10 times more than the total Russian production. Export of TVs is more than a million. There are as many cameras. Passenger cars up to 300 thousand a year. There are more than 15 million watches and clockworks. Refrigerators, radios, buses, trucks, machine tools and equipment, much, much more. But oil, at its peak, 144 million tons. Twice less than the Russian Federation sells.
          I repeat. Lying is bad.
          Dixi.
          1. tatra 27 March 2020 15: 01 New
            • 5
            • 4
            +1
            А миф "СССР сидел на нефтяной игле ,цены на нефть рухнули ,и СССР рухнул ", это один из антисоветских мифов ,которыми враги СССР трусливо оправдывают уничтожение ими СССР .
            1. Vadim237 27 March 2020 15: 23 New
              • 3
              • 3
              0
              Starting from the 70s, the Neftyanka gave the budget of the USSR from 7 to 15%, but it was a foreign currency for which the USSR subsequently purchased modern foreign: equipment, consumer goods, food, cars and so on.
          2. Vadim237 27 March 2020 15: 25 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            In the same 1986, the USSR imported $ 68 billion.
          3. Vadim237 27 March 2020 15: 29 New
            • 2
            • 5
            -3
            A modern tractor replaces 10 Soviet ones - therefore, now in such quantities that no one would produce them in the USSR, and in the foreign market as well as in the domestic market there are quite a lot of manufacturers - we produce as many as they buy and order - the last word for the client.
            1. Machito 27 March 2020 16: 08 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              Does a modern tractor have a 10 times larger bucket, or does it spin 10 times faster?
              1. Vadim237 27 March 2020 17: 41 New
                • 2
                • 6
                -4
                And here is the bucket - I'm talking about the agricultural tractor and their equipment.
          4. Svarog 27 March 2020 19: 24 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            Quote: Lannan Shi
            I repeat. Lying is bad.

            Он просто не знает.. он вообще многого не знает..но "верит".. он не читал.. но осуждает..
          5. Krasnodar 27 March 2020 20: 46 New
            • 2
            • 6
            -4
            Quote: Lannan Shi
            Quote: Okolotochny
            So it has already been, since the days of the USSR. The main foreign exchange earnings were precisely from the export of natural resources and raw materials.

            Pan overseer, but your mother didn’t teach you in childhood, what is wrong to lie?
            In 1986, the USSR exported no kopecks of 70 yards of foreign currency. And oil exports, even in the "golden" years, were around 15. Some of the tractors of the USSR were exported 10 times more than the total Russian production. Export of TVs is more than a million. There are as many cameras. Passenger cars up to 300 thousand a year. There are more than 15 million watches and clockworks. Refrigerators, radios, buses, trucks, machine tools and equipment, much, much more. But oil, at its peak, 144 million tons. Twice less than the Russian Federation sells.
            I repeat. Lying is bad.
            Dixi.

            And most of these products were exported to the CMEA countries))
            When they decided to switch to “an unsecured dollar,” the CMEA countries stopped buying third-rate products for real money.
            1. Lannan Shi 27 March 2020 20: 53 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: Krasnodar
              And most of these products were exported to the CMEA countries))

              Namely 54%.
              Quote: Krasnodar
              CMEA countries have stopped buying third-rate products for real money.

              That's only in the world there were fools who bought this third-rate product for 30 yards of foreign currency, or 50 yards of dollars. The then dollars. Or at least 150 modern ones. For the Russian Federation - a pipe dream, to sell at least half of the "third-rate" industrial products.
              1. Golovan Jack 27 March 2020 21: 12 New
                • 3
                • 5
                -2
                Quote: Lannan Shi
                That's only in the world there were fools who bought this third-rate product for 30 yards of foreign currency, or 50 yards of dollars

                Вам осталось сделать только один маленький шаг - сказать, сколько именно из этих долларов приходилось на продажу нефти, газа и прочего сырья wink

                The truth is somewhere nearby ... bolder, bolder laughing
          6. Zoldat_A 29 March 2020 07: 54 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Lannan Shi
            Quote: Okolotochny
            So it has already been, since the days of the USSR. The main foreign exchange earnings were precisely from the export of natural resources and raw materials.

            Pan overseer, but your mother didn’t teach you in childhood, what is wrong to lie?

            A man simply repeats the familiar formula invented in the West and repeated by our liberals - "Russia is the world gas station." They forget to add that the world pantry has much more than oil.

            Only one question for them is when the West (the United States in huge quantities) BUys our oil - this, in their opinion, is normal. But SELLING oil is something shameful. When America shoves its shale gas in all the cracks - that's good. And when we offer cheap gas, it’s bad.

            So it’s clear who the liberals work for. Let's close all the gates tomorrow - the liberals will be happy - Russia will cease to be a "world gas station". And how America will be happy to become this “gas station” - it simply cannot be conveyed.

            And yes, I will calm the liberal cries right away. If America does not have enough of its own oil, it will take it from the Saudis - few will argue that America has long been managing Saudi oil as its own. I would like ours too - but it doesn’t grow together somehow ...
    2. Mitroha 27 March 2020 10: 13 New
      • 4
      • 8
      -4
      Раньше, сейчас не знаю, после пожара всем селом отстраивали дом быстро. Представим образно, сейчас- четверть села будет пытаться продать тебе материал, четверть давать советы, третья четвертушка будет орать ,что не стоит и начинать, все равно ничего не получится. Ещё группа людей возьмёт на себя общее руководство. И только оставшееся небольшое количество людей будут реально строить.
      So maybe it’s enough to look for those guilty of prices, enemies, government, neighbors, the Internet, the galaxy, but you just have to start with yourself? And just work and do your job efficiently, not forgetting to put a shoulder on your neighbor?
      1. Svarog 27 March 2020 10: 31 New
        • 12
        • 6
        +6
        Quote: Mitroha
        So maybe it’s enough to look for those guilty of prices, enemies, government, neighbors, the Internet, the galaxy, but you just have to start with yourself? And just work and do your job efficiently, not forgetting to put a shoulder on your neighbor?

        Ну попробуйте самостоятельно взять кредит под оборудование для производства, при том, что все оборудование импортное и за баксы продается.. а бакс только дорожает.. и просчитайте когда оно окупится.. или вы отличный снайпер, но в руках у вас берданка то толку от вас так же не будет..
        You understand, without the participation of the state, nothing will happen on its own .. It's about the same as if the plane itself gathered .. And nothing depends on your activity, abilities .. If you are a good boxer, but you have to fight in armor knight, then you are doomed ..
        The state should develop a plan for the development of industries, allocate money for them, create conditions for a competitive product of an enterprise ... etc. This is a huge set of measures where every detail is important and if a flaw occurs in this chain or sabotage or sloppiness, then the whole chain collapses. For this reason, it is on public policy that I assign responsibility that is not effective .. and not effective, because of the narrow-mindedness, irresponsibility, theft, nepotism and sloppiness ..
        1. Machito 27 March 2020 12: 14 New
          • 9
          • 2
          +7
          On your own, you can sow a garden, plant cattle, pick up mushrooms and berries with firewood. Moonshine weld. Natural economy. Return to the primitive communal system. No, you can’t. The official will come to collect taxes. And if there are a lot of such people, the Duma will legalize taxes on mushrooms, berries, fishing, firewood, then on the list.
          But how you and your friends make a computer yourself, I would like to see. However, Nanochubais has already shown.
        2. Vadim237 27 March 2020 13: 01 New
          • 4
          • 9
          -5
          Два раза брал и оборудование - станки с ЧПУ как отечественные так и немецкие продолжаю закупать, - ни каких проблем, только людей находить и обучать, но и с этим прекрасненько справились. А это ваше "Попробуйте взять" говорит о том что вы никогда своим делом не занимались и даже не пытались продолжаете сидеть на пятой точке и ныть каждый день по любому поводу.
          1. Fan-fan 27 March 2020 15: 27 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            never did their own thing.
            And most do not need to do their own thing. Since most of them are doctors, nurses, teachers, janitors and other bakers, turners. So the question is, who will provide them with a decent life?
            1. Vadim237 27 March 2020 15: 38 New
              • 3
              • 6
              -3
              Sitting in one profession until old age is a sure way to depression, apathy, and sliding into chronic poverty.
              1. Fan-fan 27 March 2020 15: 41 New
                • 5
                • 1
                +4
                But what can you say about the dynasties of doctors, the military, etc. And what is wrong with doing your favorite thing all your life?
    3. Gene84 27 March 2020 14: 57 New
      • 17
      • 1
      +16
      Quote: Svarog
      the reason is not oil prices to be sought, but the development of production in Russia

      Albert Einstein
      There is a problem, there is no solution. Everyone knows that. And suddenly someone comes who does not know that there is no solution, and solves the problem! wink
      1. Fat
        Fat 27 March 2020 16: 36 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Gene84
        Albert Einstein
        There is a problem, there is no solution. Everyone knows that. And suddenly someone comes who does not know that there is no solution, and solves the problem!

        - this problem, in principle, has no solution!
        - thanks, we know.
        - why then suffer?
        - And what interest is it in solving a problem that, in principle, has a solution?
        From the dialogues of Cristobal Junta.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  3. The leader of the Redskins 27 March 2020 10: 00 New
    • 14
    • 6
    +8
    Ek Kharaluzhny erupted by the end of the week ... And he wrote about the armor, and about the price of oil ... Straight and the reader, and the reaper ... Especially "pleased" the conclusion. WAIT!
    Well, I will wait for new articles from the "experts of all trades" ..
    1. Fan-fan 27 March 2020 15: 31 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Everything is clear with Kharaluzhny - he wrote another article in defense of those in power. And the conclusion was - to sit quietly, quietly and most importantly, wait and hope for the best. Although we have been waiting for 20 years, the situation is either on the spot or worsening, which is more often the case.
  4. apro 27 March 2020 10: 20 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Оседлав цену на нефть Americans умело используют этот продукт для достижения своих целей...цена в талерах.котировки на западных биржах.
    1. Vadim237 27 March 2020 13: 07 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      Their shale has already become the most risky type of investment - in which more than 400 billion were swollen and there is no return at all, and now there are still problems with stucanul production, but the deposits have simply begun to deplete.
      1. Gene84 27 March 2020 15: 28 New
        • 13
        • 0
        +13
        The forecast of the International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook says that by 2025 the United States will be ahead of Russia in the field of oil and gas production.
        According to experts, shale gas will become a winning ridge for the United States.
        The calculations of the energy agency mark the broad horizons of the American fuel and energy complex - by 2030 it will give the United States nearly 85% growth in world oil production, as well as at least 30% increase in gas production.
        In July 2019, the International Energy Agency predicted a forecast, according to which, in 2020, the global oil market will be almost paralyzed by an oversupply. And as we see, while the forecast comes true.
        Last year, Igor Sechin paid tribute to the economic influence of the United States on world energy processes, adding that three regulators — Russia, Saudi Arabia, and the United States — had previously made themselves known, but now there is de facto one regulator — the United States. And this, according to Sechin, "must be taken for granted."
        Something like this ... And you say
        Quote: Vadim237
        mining problems stukanulo just deposits began to dwindle
        1. Vadim237 27 March 2020 15: 40 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          I generally mean the production of shale oil.
      2. Fan-fan 27 March 2020 15: 32 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        and no return at all

        How no? They seem to come to first place in the world in oil production.
        1. Vadim237 27 March 2020 15: 42 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          They left then they left - but there is no return at current prices below 50 bucks per barrel.
          1. Fan-fan 27 March 2020 15: 43 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Well, such low prices do not always rise again.
    2. knn54 27 March 2020 13: 50 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Похоже,что ОПЕК уже не сможет диктовать цены на нефть.
      Например. 6 лет назад ФРС США резко поднял процентные ставки,что привело к резкому удорожанию доллара, Рост ставок привел к оттоку ПО СУТИ спекулятивного капитала с биржевого рынка нефти, что и привело к падению ее цены.
      We add here shale oil, the interest in the production of which is shown by more and more countries, including China.
      Plus green, environmentalists.
      1. Vadim237 27 March 2020 15: 30 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        It is no longer profitable to invest in its prey.
  5. iouris 27 March 2020 11: 05 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Well. And where are the graphs?
    1. BREAKTHROUGH READY 27 March 2020 13: 33 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      graphics are so-so, therefore, they are not in the article
      1. iouris 27 March 2020 14: 04 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Where is the year 1973?
  6. rosomaha 27 March 2020 11: 48 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    опять повторюсь - Грановский и Харалужный, что единственные авторы на сайте? В каждом разделе, каждый день по неск статеёнок. Ибо назвать это статьёй нельзя. Нет объёма материала, нет аналитики и глубины описываемого материала - так из википеда взяли инфы...и усё, author. Я вообще за запрет статей меньше 3стр и с поверхностными знаниями материала. Пусть лучше 1 статья в неделю будет, но заслуживающая внимания. А то что эти пишут - можно писать и в коментах, как своё мнение/видение ситуации. Ну доколе уже можно то!
    1. BREAKTHROUGH READY 27 March 2020 13: 37 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      If you introduce restrictions on volume, then all the articles will become similar to the “work” of Kiril Ryabov with retelling of the same ten times and transfusion of water.
      If you introduce a limit on the number of article postings, then the authors will simply upload articles from different accounts under different pseudonyms.
  7. 16112014nk 27 March 2020 13: 22 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    ... a new rise will inevitably come. Including for oil markets
    Quote: Bearded
    oil is getting cheaper, and gas is getting more expensive.

    The situation, of course, will inevitably change:
    1. BREAKTHROUGH READY 27 March 2020 13: 41 New
      • 0
      • 7
      -7
      And all because domestic prices are lower than world prices and are kept artificially. Until it evens out, the cost of the fuel will creep up, if only there was a reason.
      1. 16112014nk 27 March 2020 13: 53 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: BREAKTHROUGH READY
        Until it evens out, with

        Salaries and pensions seem to have leveled off, and have been creeping down for 6 years now.
        1. BREAKTHROUGH READY 27 March 2020 13: 56 New
          • 1
          • 6
          -5
          Prices will rise - salaries will increase, but the margin and income of businessmen will fall.
          1. Dude 27 March 2020 14: 06 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: BREAKTHROUGH READY
            Prices will rise - salaries will rise too, but business margins and profits will fall.

            Do you yourself believe in what you said, or is it such a subtle irony? wink
            1. BREAKTHROUGH READY 27 March 2020 14: 25 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              In the realm of knowledge, faith is not needed.
              If law enforcement agencies will conscientiously serve, then everything will be as I wrote in the comment.
              1. Dude 27 March 2020 16: 56 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                If law enforcement agencies will conscientiously serve, then everything will be as I wrote in the comment.
                So, after all, it was an irony)))
          2. 16112014nk 27 March 2020 14: 15 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: BREAKTHROUGH READY
            Prices will rise - so will salaries

            In my head, as they say, cognitive dissonance occurs. request
            1. BREAKTHROUGH READY 27 March 2020 14: 27 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              What exactly causes you misunderstanding?
  8. Avior 27 March 2020 13: 42 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    . We can talk about any oil pricing as such starting from the 70s of the twentieth century. That is, from the collapse of the monopoly on the extraction and sale of energy from the notorious "Seven Sisters" (the largest multinational corporations, which until then fully controlled the industry and the market), as well as the emergence of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

    And the author himself writes that since 1973 prices have risen, a typical sign of the emergence of a monopoly
    In general, here is a schedule of price changes, it would be necessary to bring in the article, in my opinion
  9. honest people 27 March 2020 15: 22 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Quote: apro
    Оседлав цену на нефть Americans умело используют этот продукт для достижения своих целей...цена в талерах.котировки на западных биржах.

    Oil cheaper blame the Americans!
    Oil rises, Americans are to blame!
  10. honest people 27 March 2020 15: 48 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: Vadim237
    Their shale has already become the most risky type of investment - in which more than 400 billion were swollen and there is no return at all, and now there are still problems with stucanul production, but the deposits have simply begun to deplete.

    About the Shale End Caster Sect tongue
    Manuals require adjustment


    1. The comment was deleted.
  11. rosomaha 27 March 2020 16: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: BREAKTHROUGH READY
    If you introduce restrictions

    в таком случае каждую статью пусть читают админы и статьи с похожим либо повторяющимся материалом отсеивать
  12. honest people 27 March 2020 18: 29 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Vadim237
    Я в отличии от вас всех здесь - по крупному на нефтяные котировки ставлю в рост и падение уж мне то не знать что сейчас там творится со сланцем у них полная жопа невзирая сколько правительство купит нефти для своих хранилищ и сколько миллиардов ни чем не обеспеченных бумажек туда закачают да же предыдущих вложений и 30 процентов сланец не окупил и уже не окупит для инвесторов это теперь чёрная дыра.

    Kremlebot do you really want to convince me of this? wassat
  13. Operator 27 March 2020 18: 44 New
    • 0
    • 4
    -4
    There is a price war on the oil market on three fronts - the USA, Russia and KSA. So far, the US is losing because of the loss of production at current oil prices.
  14. Fishery 29 March 2020 10: 28 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Rosneft will stop its work in Venezuela and sell assets related to activities in this country, the Russian oil and gas company said.