About the new Constitution of the Russian Federation: comments


After reviewing a part of the (small) comments from readers in an article about the “amendments” to the Constitution, I decided to continue the topic.


And the first thing that inspired me to do this was a demonstration of a complete misunderstanding of the issue by readers.

The main mass that lives in a constant struggle with the terrible disease “The First Channel of the Brain” and which comes to “VO” exclusively to express its Personal Opinion and show how damaged the author is is dedicated.

Instead of an epigraph:

"The author is a liberal of pure water .. in fact a traitor to the MOTHERLAND! who ever ran this article here? question to administrators .. WHO allowed a traitor to write an article here? the author is a lying parasite .... that climbs out who really writes articles here .... An article is custom-made pure water .. Constitutional changes it is IMPORTANT to vote for it MANDATORY! and to the author of the article there is a desire to solder the TIME for INFRASCIA and alarmism! ! "

Spelling and punctuation of the original are fully preserved.

The portrait of a true patriot is evident. It reminds me very much of one European country. There were such vogue performances from the rostrum and on the radio. How it ended, everyone remembers?

For almost 10 years of work at VO, I have long concluded for myself that there are a lot of smart people. That's just to speak, they are no longer torn in the front ranks, but this is understandable. Messi will not go to play Erchim for any money, even considering that this club is a 9-time champion. Mongolia, true, but still ... I think the analogy here is clear.

Therefore, it does not pull to argue and spend arguments.

But there is another. Here it is:

“Not a word about the ban on the alienation of the territories of Russia, the author is against this amendment, why are you silent. Not a word about the ban on foreign citizens being officials (ban on second citizenship). Not a word about an attempt to change the relationship between international norms and rules and Russian laws, if international is harmful to us, we are guided by our laws. So far, we are guided by the instructions of the IMF, RRB, etc. ”

Okay, there was an attempt made. Because - let's go.

So, about the alienation of territories. A very important point? No, it is clear that after introducing this paragraph into the Constitution, if Vanya Vetkin says / writes in Odnoklassniki that “they failed, the Kuril Islands”, Vanya will have to be imprisoned. As I understand it, this is exactly what the “patriots” want.

Excuse me, can Vanya give the Kuril Islands? Not. Is it stupid? Stupid.

And who can? No, is that real?

And let’s Khrushchev in the next world alone leave. He transferred this Crimea from one republic of the USSR to another. Another question that Yeltsin did not want to take ...

Or another moment. Rejection, transmission is bad. And when is it under the brand name of “demarcation” - how is it? Yes, I’m talking about September 5, 2010, when with a stroke of the pen, Medvedev and Putin suddenly gave the Norwegians 80 square kilometers of the shelf. Together with fishing grounds and oil reserves.

And do not say that Putin has "nothing to do with it, it’s Medvedev who is all a scoundrel." Medvedev, he poor fellow, only on Twitter could write something without the permission of his prime minister.

And the islands on the Amur? Ah, demarcation too ...

Here, in fact, is the answer to the question: how to give territory correctly, if you really want to. Already itchy when. Demarcation. At the request of the “one”, the parties specified, measured and so on.

So ... All these screams somehow don't look very good. To ban the tearing away of the territory suddenly decided by those who gave them quite normally. Yes, at first they gave it away, then it was banned. In addition to demarcation. The loophole remained, otherwise in general “bees against honey” turned out.

Second part. International law and the rejection of its prevalence over national.

I don’t know why everyone was so excited about this business. I don’t “understand”, but I don’t know how to eat it. Because from a legal point of view, you can make different calculations, but without international legal organizations you can’t get far.

I repeat and quote my reader again:

“Not a word about an attempt to change the relationship between international norms and rules and Russian laws, if international is harmful to us, we are guided by our laws. So far, we are guided by the instructions of the IMF, RRB, etc. ”

The reader has piled together international law and international financial institutions.

Meanwhile, existing international norms are not ignored, but do not govern the domestic legal systems in most countries of the world.

So, in the United States in the event of a conflict between the rule of international law and domestic law (and in particular a precedent), the judge will always be guided by the latter. In the UK, a judge has no competence to apply international law if it does not comply with national law. If in France an international obligation contains a provision contrary to the constitution, then permission to ratify or approve it can be given only after a constitutional review.

Who is against this? Yes, no one. I do not mind, although some readers attribute it to me.

Another question: when does it work?

Perhaps it is worth recalling what the Constitution is. She, the Constitution, is defined as The basic Law, and all other normative acts, laws, rules that apply in the territory of the Russian Federation, must not contradict it.

You see, if, say, an international treaty contradicts the Constitution of the Russian Federation, then the Constitution is in force. And no one in the world will say anything, everyone has the same thing.

Yes, of course, the supremacy of the Constitution is wonderful. The whole secret here is that the Constitution, as our American partners say, is not a self-fulfilling law. Her, darling, it is necessary to execute. But it’s more difficult to get to the Constitutional Court here than to reach Berlin in 1941.

And in general, many were faced with the fact that on the basis of foreign laws they were inconvenient? Did many feel Uncle Sam's heavy hand on his neck? International law and international laws strangling our weak Constitution?

I understand that there is a definition of international law. But, alas, there is neither an international criminal code in it, nor any other. International law is a set of agreements and national laws of all countries.

There is, of course, the International Criminal Court in The Hague. But he operates with concepts that are in the legislation of any normal country: genocide, war crimes and so on.

UN International Court of Justice. Also an interesting organization.

When considering a case and making decisions, the Court applies the sources of law, which are defined in article 38 of its Statute:
- international conventions and treaties;
- international custom;
- general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;
- court decisions and doctrines of the most qualified specialists in international law.

In addition, if the parties to the dispute agree, the Court may decide the case on the basis of the principle ex aequo et bono, that is, in fairness, without limiting itself to the applicable rules of international law.

And the most interesting.

It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution is prescribed that international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems. Say, we don’t recognize, we are sending, we are all so proud and independent that right now we will calibrate everyone!

Yeah ... And who will tell me why Gazprom, having lost the court with Naftogaz, losing slippers, rushed to transfer money? Yes, and considering that cheap got off?

We are all so cool ... With Caliber!

Everything is simple. There are international standards under which ALL parties to proceedings are required to act. And if one of the parties decides that international law is for the wimps, then be sure that this side will be immediately understood.

And not aircraft carriers.

If Gazprom, having lost the court of last resort to Naftogaz, refused to pay, then it would simply run into the confiscation of its assets on the territory of those countries that are civilized. And given the fact that it’s kind of like a state-owned company, it could easily be possible to seize any property of the Russian Federation around the world against Gazprom’s legal debts.

And if someone does not believe, then I advise you to recall how the embassies in the United States were closed.

To summarize, I can say the following. The coolest country in terms of democracy, the United States, has 7 articles in the Constitution. And it’s very, I note, that it lives quite well.

For comparison: the Indian Constitution consists of 465 articles, 12 major annexes, more than 70 amendments.

It’s not a question, you can fuck everything in the constitution. At least a change of signals at a traffic light. Anything. The constitution becomes the basic law only when it is strictly implemented. And it is not a toy for everyone who can afford to reach it.

So far, in Russia it turns out that way. A huge number of amendments are aimed solely at ensuring the rule of those who today really have power in Russia. That is, the oligarchy.

Want an example? Easy.

Central Bank type regulator. Which should be the first to guard the interests of the ruble. So far, for all of her rule, Ms. Nabiullina has fulfilled ONE promise: to let the ruble go into free fall and not support it.

He, sickly, has since fallen. The only question is how quickly it will reach 100 per dollar. In what comes - no doubt. All prerequisites are created.

Of course, gentlemen, our patriots are sure that as soon as the Constitution of the Russian Federation is added that the Central Bank is obliged to take care of the ruble exchange rate, it will immediately become 30 per dollar.

Well, dream it is not forbidden.

No, it’s clear that agents of the State Department were to blame for the catastrophic fall of the ruble, who pushed Novak out of the OPEC meeting room and broke his pen so that he couldn’t sign anything.

The best slogan: “vote, or lose.” The funniest thing is that they vote. And they lose. With the stubbornness of neighbors whose rake dances are national fun. But at least they can afford to experiment with the presidents. What if you're lucky?

Unlucky. But ours do not even try. What for?

We must accept the amendments, because Putin so wanted - we will accept. Without going into details that 97% of the Constitution is dedicated to the fact that a handful of politicians and oligarchs will rule almost forever. What for? The main thing is that the family will only be treated as a union of a man and a woman. There are no other problems in Russia, right? And God is officially recognized.

Dual citizenship will be banned for officials ... Wow, what a progressive step ... God, whoever needs it, whoever steals, he just then, having vacated his chair, will buy this citizenship and calmly leave there, to live honestly worked out.

Chubais does not have a second citizenship. No, Nabiullina. No, Medvedev. No Gref. No Sechin. No Serdyukov. Do you feel better, gentlemen, patriots? I have listed, it turns out, the most worthy and honest, who do not have citizenship other than Russian. Everything is fine, we are building a crowd and bring down a bright future.

Well, or accept the new Constitution. Because, it turns out, it’s important to accept all the amendments. Of course, it’s important. The only question is to whom.

After all, everything is already thought out, it remains only to vote. For the Constitution, which undoubtedly, as soon as it is adopted, it will make everyone rich and drag it into a brighter future.

Gentlemen, doesn’t it bother you that the same people as 10 years ago will execute the Constitution? And they will obviously perform in exactly the same way?

It doesn’t bother. Clear.

For the rest, who are not among them, I will allow myself to give only one call to action. Think. Think and draw conclusions. The conclusions are primarily about how much what is being declared today is in line with expectations and reality. How much can you believe those who do things like pension robbery, Plato, games with the ruble and gas prices that grow only in Russia. And further down the list.

Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.
Author:
Photos used:
kremlin.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

388 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Aerodrome 26 March 2020 05: 51 New
    • 59
    • 22
    +37
    About the new Constitution of the Russian Federation: comments
    The novel, in general, is right, this will be a new constitution (there will be no doubt that it will be doubted, everything is done, the “cosmetics” remains.) And of course, the horror that the “referendum” is “a package” - “yes, with two” with quotation marks "... good amendments are masked, coupled with nonsense, and frank fonts" for themselves ". let them bear it ... I’m not coming. I decided. it makes no sense to play with someone who has three aces up his sleeve.
    1. Uncle lee 26 March 2020 06: 25 New
      • 103
      • 13
      +90
      You cannot argue with the Leader of the world proletariat!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Machito 27 March 2020 16: 32 New
        • 12
        • 5
        +7
        The amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation actually establish the dictatorship of the oligarchy. Changes to the Constitution were adopted by all public authorities in less than a week. In order to give the appearance of legitimacy to the amendments to the Constitution, it was decided to hold a popular vote, which does not solve anything. The decision has already been made by all levels of government, but postponed until a deliberative vote is held with the people.
        The authorities became generous from the successful constitutional coup and granted the people the right of consultative vote.
        Meanwhile, according to the current Constitution of the Russian Federation, the main source of power is the people.
        The constitution is trampled. Welcome to the dictatorship of the capitalists with the Russian Guard on guard of their interests.
        1. Victor N 27 March 2020 17: 30 New
          • 6
          • 15
          -9
          Useful corrections. They passed quickly because the people in power were smart and intelligent, and it was not for nothing that the people chose them. And the dull hiss and spit.
        2. Nikza 28 March 2020 17: 36 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          So what? The previous Constitution has not been implemented and this will be interpreted as they need. The author is right. The point is not in the law, but in those who monitor its implementation. And the people in general do not care for everything. There is a smartphone with rollers and even though the grass does not grow.
    2. Gene84 26 March 2020 06: 34 New
      • 74
      • 17
      +57
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Roman, in general, is right

      The novel is not just right; Roman wrote a wonderful article! There is something to think about and make the right decision on the voting procedure for the adopted constitutional amendments.
      1. Svarog 26 March 2020 07: 09 New
        • 56
        • 19
        +37
        Quote: Gene84
        The novel is not just right; Roman wrote a wonderful article!

        I support .. Roman smashed "patriots" on each item ..
        1. Stas157 26 March 2020 07: 46 New
          • 41
          • 12
          +29
          Quote: Svarog
          I support .. Roman carried the "patriots" for each item..

          Recently, they generally look faded.
          1. kjhg 26 March 2020 09: 01 New
            • 42
            • 5
            +37
            Quote: Stas157
            Quote: Svarog
            I support .. Roman carried the "patriots" for each item..

            Recently, they generally look faded.

            There is a rational explanation for this. According to the box, they can’t say anything intelligible (they’re not capable of thinking on their own), except for appealing for amendments such as idiotic that marriage is a union of a man and a woman. But it is written in black and white in the family code! Or, the same idiotic record that Russia was created by God. And they want it in the Constitution, in the 21st century, Karl! In the West, in this regard, they look at us as if they had completely gone crazy. And I honestly understand them. This is the same thing that a couple of centuries ago the Constitution would have written that the Earth is flat and rests on three pillars. But, unfortunately, the power of propaganda is such that it can both create in good hands and destroy it, falling into the hands of dark forces. This was clearly demonstrated to us by the Germans in the 20th century. The current Russian government is doing its best to recall this by manipulating, zombifying and mocking its people. But we have two significant advantages over the German people of those times. This is the Internet and a good memory of the Soviet past. Therefore, I believe that the current government in the foreseeable future is doomed to overthrow, condemn and hold a people's trial over it.
            PS Many thanks to Roman for his righteous work. There is confidence that while there are such people, we will not slip to the level of the 3rd Reich.
            1. Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 07 New
              • 21
              • 3
              +18
              Quote: kjhg
              the power of propaganda is such that it can both create, in good hands, and destroy it, falling into the hands of dark forces.

              The authorities are no less convinced that street campaigning is a death sentence for her, that it takes only 2-3 years to pass — and she will face the ghost of a popular revolution.
              Russian Social Democratic Party
              and her immediate tasks. 1901 //
              Op., Vol. 1, p. 26-28.

              https://www.politpros.com/bulletin/read/?ID=1189&bulletin=115
          2. I
            I 26 March 2020 09: 06 New
            • 11
            • 29
            -18
            ,, Quote: Svarog
            I support .. Roman smashed "patriots" on each item ..

            They have recently looked generally faded. ,,


            It all depends on the goals of the author and admins. As they need, they look so.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Den717 26 March 2020 11: 41 New
          • 12
          • 23
          -11
          Quote: Svarog
          Roman carried the "patriots" for each item ..

          On the whole, I am not opposed to "scamming" if it is carried out conclusively and reasonably. Only here is not the task - the article is called not "the distribution of patriots", but "about the new constitution. Comments." The author popped in the wrong direction. Instead of a constitution, the author began to express grudges against criticizing the article. The content of the article "on the new constitution" I would see something like this:
          ".... In short, the content is as follows:
          1. The Council of State is a simple organ under the president; no additional constitutional powers have been issued to him.
          The federal law on a state body is a ritual phenomenon; it exists even in relation to the Public Chamber. The State Council will not even get the right to legislative initiative.
          2. The President will not be able to hold office for more than two terms at all. The "Anti-Solzhenitsyn" amendment for the 1993 presidential candidates (10 years of residence in Russia) has been clarified and strengthened - now you need to live for at least 25 years and never have foreign citizenship or residence permit.
          But Natalya Poklonskaya will be able to become president - for the case of the entry of foreign states or their parts into Russia they made exceptions .....
          Or so:
          ".... In the conditions of life under the same Constitution in the past and this century, it is very significant how political approaches in the system of checks and balances in the formation of the Constitutional Court changed. In 1994-1995, there were memorable examples when out of six There were one candidate approved for the Federation Council’s vacancies, one, at best, three. For many years now, the algorithm is different: they represent and appoint one. But the Federation Council has the previous powers under the Constitution, no one took them away - it holds a secret ballot. So, there are some other factors.

          Even the tactics of using the Constitution has changed. President Yeltsin objected to the version of the law on the protection of cultural property adopted by the Federal Assembly, but since his veto had been overcome, he had to sign this law and then turn to the Constitutional Court with a request to declare it unconstitutional. It is impossible to name such a precedent in the current situation: it is excluded due to the mentality of power, which leads to paralysis of the mechanisms of the Constitution, to their replacement by other forms of interaction, not at all through a system of checks and balances.

          Now at the level of the Constitution, it is proposed to consolidate the direct subordination to the president of all government "power" departments, as well as his authority to appoint their leaders, and there are not even statements against such an amendment. And in 1992, the Constitutional Court appealed and was deprived of legal force as a presidential decree on the merger of two departments of this category - the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the FSB, which is not consistent with the principle of separation of powers .... "
          This is what the analysis of the proposed amendments should look like.
          And this
          We must accept the amendments, because Putin so wanted - we will accept. Without going into details that 97% of the Constitution is dedicated to the fact that a handful of politicians and oligarchs will rule almost forever. What for? The main thing is that the family will only be treated as a union of a man and a woman. There are no other problems in Russia, right? And God is officially recognized.

          Dual citizenship will be banned for officials ... Wow, what a progressive step ... God, whoever needs it, whoever steals, he just then, having vacated his chair, will buy this citizenship and calmly leave there, to live honestly worked out.

          more like a high school student essay on the theme of the day.
          1. Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 11 New
            • 13
            • 4
            +9
            Quote: Den717
            The author popped in the wrong direction. Instead of a constitution, the author began to express grudges against criticizing the article. The content of the article "on the new constitution" I would see something like this:

            This was in the previous article. In this article, the author decided to analyze the comments.
            1. Den717 26 March 2020 13: 43 New
              • 8
              • 22
              -14
              Quote: Gene84
              In this article, the author decided to analyze the comments.

              And what did you make out? Some tears and resentment of a misunderstood genius ...
              1. Victor N 26 March 2020 15: 39 New
                • 6
                • 15
                -9
                The Constitution is a form of agreement on public consent on the basis of not a consensus, but a COMPROMISE. The procedure for the formation of this agreement is carried out by democratic institutions - elected authorities, with the participation of representatives of the public in the discussion. As the last could be each of us. Who did not have time - he was late. There are simply no other forms of discussion: you won’t collect it. Everything is simple. But, apparently, the author and many commentators do not understand this. And the author bears moral responsibility for his work. (Sometimes legal). As an editorial for publication.
                That the first article, that the second - do not carry any construct. Grunts on the basis of misunderstanding and excitement of artless readers.
              2. LeonidL 26 March 2020 21: 58 New
                • 8
                • 12
                -4
                Skomorokhov’s conclusion is unambiguous as always - "everything is lost!", "The authorities are stupid", "there are many fools - only the clever one is Roman, Timokhin, the physicist who joined them ..." who disagrees with Roman and the fools. So it goes through all the articles. Ball is ruled by pseudo-inventors, quasi-admirals and political analysts of dubious political orientation. And all these sirs and mysters are grouped under the flag of the virtues and well-wishers of Russia. After buying up the site by some muddy Canadian figures, expecting more from this audience is simply useless. Ban and thank God. Banya already for a while.
        3. Vadim237 26 March 2020 12: 30 New
          • 7
          • 29
          -22
          We have patriots, there are financial and industrial patriots, there are military patriots and patriots in other spheres of society, and there are patriots for whining every day with snotty articles in which everything is heaped together and on topics that have already been sucked and licked from all sides thousands of times but keep your audience and feed, after all, let them at least give a damn.
        4. Honest Citizen 26 March 2020 14: 12 New
          • 13
          • 8
          +5
          Quote: Svarog
          I support .. Roman smashed "patriots" on each item ..

          Someone Petrov will come running now, and one day he will “cross out” all the works. For thinking for a "patriot" is an overwhelming job. laughing
      2. Stas157 26 March 2020 07: 27 New
        • 54
        • 16
        +38
        Surprisingly, it is precisely those who see the urgent need for an amendment to ban the alienation of territory have always been FOR Putin. Which for a long time conducted backstage negotiations with the Japanese in the Kuril Islands and bluntly said that you can pair the island with the Japanese and give ... for a piece of peace.

        Where does such inconstancy and variability come from? And all from the fact that the messengers always hesitate with the "party line." They have no solid stance. Except for one - blind faith in Putin.
        1. military_cat 26 March 2020 08: 03 New
          • 23
          • 6
          +17
          Quote: Stas157
          Except for one - blind faith in Putin.
          Amendment - except for blind faith in propaganda, if it fits into their post-Soviet resentment.
        2. Stirbjorn 26 March 2020 09: 30 New
          • 19
          • 2
          +17
          Quote: Stas157
          Where does such inconstancy and variability come from? And all from the fact that the messengers always hesitate with the "party line." They have no solid stance. Except for one - blind faith in Putin.

          Orwell’s called it in 1984 — doublethink!
        3. lelik613 27 March 2020 18: 30 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          Amendment ... of the belief that they will capitalize on this
        4. alecsis69 28 March 2020 01: 14 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          You repeat the ravings of liberals about Putin’s desire to give the islands. If you bother to look at the conditions under which it is possible to transfer the two islands of Japan, you would see that it is not a piece of paper, but the neutral status of Japan with the inevitable ban on the deployment of foreign military bases on its territory. And the two islands in question, this is actually a pile of stones located on the outside of the main ridge, that is, not having strategic importance, unlike the other two islands.
        5. bayard 28 March 2020 07: 11 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Quote: Stas157
          Surprisingly, it is precisely those who see the urgent need for an amendment to ban the alienation of territory

          I understand that you are for the alienation of territories?
          Quote: Stas157
          FOR Putin. Which for a long time conducted backstage negotiations with the Japanese in the Kuril Islands and bluntly said that you can pair the island with the Japanese and give

          Are you sure of that?
          What did you want to give?
          And why then with such joy and enthusiasm supported Mashkov’s proposal?
          Or do you think that Mashkov is so - impromptu?
          Or is it not noticeable to you from home how you had to maneuver on the diplomatic front, while you were able to somehow cover the Far Eastern borders?
          If I really wanted to give, I would give for a long time. Just in an explicit order, and I would have found a reason for this.
          But Russian diplomacy was exhausting the Japanese with negotiations for years, until there was at least some potential for force containment of the excessively zealous samurai.
          And now, a special article of the Constitution will explicitly FORBID not only negotiating on such a topic, but even simply discussing it at the international level. And our diplomats will finally breathe calmer. Indeed, such negotiations surely brought little pleasure to them.
          Do you admire the opus of Roman?
          His heated grievances and bile, splashed onto the audience of VO?
          His longing for even a bush to call the wolf a bastard?
          He devoted so much space to the Central Bank in his opus, calling it a "state institution", but did not say a word about what kind of structure it was and who its founder was ...
          But he KNOWS it.
          Knows, but prefers to fool around.
          - 49,5% of the Central Bank shares are owned by the US Federal Reserve.
          - 49,5% of the shares in London City.
          - 1% belongs to citizen Gerashchenko - the first head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and the main lobbyist of its creation.
          This is the control body of international banking structures behind the financial system of the Russian Federation, imposed on the drunken criminal Yeltsin. And its activities, rights and powers are determined by the Law on the Central Bank and the tripartite agreement between these financial institutions and the Russian Federation.
          That is why Russia does not have the right to conduct an independent monetary policy, CAMA to issue ruble stocks and credit its economy, CAMA to decide on maintaining the ruble exchange rate to other currencies, CAMA to control the banking sector. AND OBLIGED to comply with ALL "recommendations" of the IMF and the World Bank.
          Do you really think that Roman does not know this?
          He knows!
          We talked with him about this topic, but in the dialogue he behaves like a Ukrainian troll "but what’s wrong with that, but still I don’t understand."
          He and others like him are now leading people to protest and sabotage the popular vote.
          Yes, all the main reasons for this constitutional reform are legislatively, on the basis of the Constitution, to receive the right of the Russian State to terminate ALL international treaties and obligations that do not meet Russia's national interests and contradict (after amendments) the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
          That is why these powers are needed in order to DENOMATE all these shameful agreements:
          - agreement on the Central Bank
          - About juvenile justice (when foreign structures take away children from Russian families).
          - An agreement on the supremacy of international law over Russian law (now IT is spelled out in the Constitution).
          - an agreement on the Budget Rule, according to which Russia does not have the right to manage even money earned from foreign trade, in excess of the ceiling set by the IMF.
          and many other “wonderful” documents that you don’t even know about (there are some).
          And do not lie (I am to the author of the article) that Putin did not attempt to get rid of this bondage before.
          Did.
          But it didn’t. In 2005, when an incredible effort of all government lived, he almost completely repaid all external debts of the Russian Federation, the USSR and even RI.
          An attempt was made to gain exactly FINANCIAL independence. With the nationalization of the Central Bank and the entire banking sector.
          Yes ! Exactly . None of the commercial private banks should have remained in the country.
          But it didn’t work out.
          People died - his friends, set to solve this problem.
          And an ultimatum was presented from the owners of the money.
          Have you heard about this?
          I am sure that if you had heard, you would have a completely different idea of ​​the world around you.
          The last time did not work, because neither military nor economic potential allowed us to defend our right to sovereignty.
          And I had to retreat.
          And save up strength and resources for the next attempt.
          Now the military potential, and the external contour provided by Russian diplomacy, and the economic stability of the state give real chances for victory.
          Otherwise, we simply will not.
          On the Earth .
          And it is not we who challenge.
          The challenge is thrown to us.
          This is WAR.
          And in conditions of war, mobilization of all the healthy forces of society is needed.
          And the unhealthy part must be isolated and uprooted.
          In any case, from the government, finance and business.

          And just don’t think that I’m bending over - I’ve been living in the war for the sixth year.
          Present.
          Where bullets and shells do not make out political views and family clan preferences.
        6. Lekz 31 March 2020 16: 58 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Why did you decide that Putin’s supporters support the transfer of the “disputed” islands of Japan? Just all the "pro-Putin", unlike you, understand that it is necessary to conclude a contract, and for this it is necessary to negotiate. And if Putin saw the possibility of transferring the islands of Japan, he would have done it a long time ago. And so that no one has any illusions, you need an entry in the Constitution.
      3. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 29 New
        • 44
        • 11
        +33
        Quote: Gene84
        The novel is not just right; Roman wrote a wonderful article! There is something to think about and make the right decision on the voting procedure for the adopted constitutional amendments.

        I also agree with Skomorokhov, it is a pity I could not discuss the first article, but I am against the amendments, and even more so without a referendum.
        And now all the puzzles are developing since they are nature itself against Putin, his corrections and his lifelong reign.
        I don’t go to any voting plans.
        1. Stas157 26 March 2020 07: 37 New
          • 27
          • 13
          +14
          Quote: Stroporez
          Any hand I won’t go to the vote.

          I, too!
          1. Romey 26 March 2020 08: 29 New
            • 22
            • 13
            +9
            I, too, for the boycott. But a boycott is only effective when less organized. And this is a problem. But in general it would be nice to discuss this matter.
            1. Leshy1975 26 March 2020 11: 43 New
              • 14
              • 7
              +7
              Quote: romey
              I, too, for the boycott. But a boycott is only effective when less organized. And this is a problem. But in general it would be nice to discuss this matter.

              Me too - DO NOT go. There, the whole procedure was redone for only one thing - that it would be impossible to verify how exactly they voted. In such conditions, it is a pure crossbow. Just create a picture for PR to propagandists. They will announce that the people have actively and massively supported. hi
              1. aybolyt678 27 March 2020 08: 56 New
                • 1
                • 4
                -3
                Quote: Leshy1975
                Me too - DO NOT go

                And here I go and vote against. Only the authorities have already understood that the people will be against and support the coronavirus for handling their affairs
          2. balunn 26 March 2020 08: 49 New
            • 18
            • 8
            +10
            Comrades, we must go. You have to go and express your attitude. If you do not go your vote will be considered as something that you agree. Another thing is that then it’s not possible to actually calculate how much for and how much against
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. snake 26 March 2020 10: 54 New
              • 21
              • 7
              +14
              Quote: balunn
              Comrades, we must go.

              No need to go. No meaning. What will happen, what will not - the crooks will accept their amendments. Ignore or our active AGAINST we will not achieve anything. And it’s better to spend your time on something more productive: well, there, stay with your family, watch a movie or read a book. Recall our Twain Mark: "If something depended on us, we would not be invited to the polls."
              The only thing that inspires me with hope is that when / if the power in the Russian Federation changes, then when searching for the scapegoat for the previous "breakthroughs", all these constitutional laws will not be taken into account.
              You can only spoil the appearance of the organizers of the circus, but nothing more. And it also seems to me that the Putinists are calling to go and vote “against”. The amendments will be adopted one way or another, but with a good turnout it will look "more legitimate." Do not go to these pseudo-elections. Take care of your time and nerves. We still need them.
              1. AK1972 26 March 2020 11: 53 New
                • 13
                • 3
                +10
                Quote: serpent
                No need to go. No meaning. What will happen, what will not - the crooks will accept their amendments.

                Absolutely agree. I will say more, the amendments have already been adopted. Yesterday a video hit the u-tube, in Belgorod, the book 2020 already has a beautiful cover in the bookstore.
              2. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 16: 26 New
                • 11
                • 6
                +5
                Quote: serpent
                serpent (Sergey)

                Comrade, you’re saying everything correctly, only a total boycott !!!
              3. aybolyt678 28 March 2020 12: 04 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: serpent
                No need to go. No meaning.

                I think the point is that everyone should use their one / fifty millionth share people's power
                1. Victor N 28 March 2020 16: 04 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  I believe that it is necessary to make it mandatory for citizens to participate in the elections. How is it in Argentina ?. In case of failure to appear, fine and restrict rights.
                  1. aybolyt678 28 March 2020 17: 56 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Victor N
                    I believe that it is necessary to make it mandatory for citizens to participate in the elections. How is it in Argentina ?. In case of failure to appear, fine and restrict rights.

                    restrict rights necessarily! or as an option, if you fail to appear, delegate your authority to someone else you trust
          3. Svarog 26 March 2020 09: 07 New
            • 15
            • 12
            +3
            Quote: Stas157
            Quote: Stroporez
            Any hand I won’t go to the vote.

            I, too!

            I don’t go to vote either!
            1. New Year day 26 March 2020 20: 24 New
              • 10
              • 2
              +8
              Quote: Svarog
              I don’t go to vote either!

              there will be no vote, gentlemen, comrades! "Kina will not be, the light is over"
              1. alecsis69 28 March 2020 01: 17 New
                • 5
                • 1
                +4
                Just some sort of coven. Everyone repeats "Echo of Moscow" and completely turned off the brain. And how could this happen to such a reputable resource?
                1. bayard 28 March 2020 07: 42 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  Quote: alecsis69
                  Everyone repeats "Echo of Moscow" and completely turned off the brain. And how could this happen to such a reputable resource?

                  Accumulated grievances and disappointments from the Pension Reform and other gifts from the Medvedev government.
                  Compelled concessions under the pressure of superior external forces are perceived by many as malicious intent and criminal conspiracy.
                  The site has left a lot of serious, wise life and experience of members of the forum. In any case, they stopped commenting. And the content on the site dipped very high quality. And pretty yellowed.
                  But it all began as a veteran military site ...
                  Alas, everything is in the past.
                  And those who stayed often do not want to analyze and think critically - they live with emotions, with short RAM ...
                  If in the end they get what they are trying to achieve — breaking the Constitutional amendments and asserting colonial law over Russia forever ... THEY DESERVED THIS.
                  request
                  Right now they are throwing minuses and will rejoice, like small children who ran away from their parents and mated behind a cyan camp.
                  Their choice.
                  But then there will be no one to blame.
                2. Lekz 31 March 2020 16: 54 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  So they are multi-pitters. So the output and salary are greater.
              2. bayard 28 March 2020 07: 27 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Quote: Silvestr
                "Kina will not be, the light is over"

                End of the world ? belay
                Well quarantine.
                Well, they’ll postpone the vote.
                Just think time will be at your leisure.
                Including verify your opinion, with such a "respected" resource as "Echo of Moscow". I have the impression that the country is not an epidemic from the coronovirus, but chickenpox from the Echo of Moscow.
                For such a previously serious site like VO, this is a shame.
                Or a coincidence?
                But in quarantine, we’ll think about what kind of a fad it is.
        2. basmach 26 March 2020 08: 42 New
          • 24
          • 8
          +16
          Valera, hi. It is all of course so. Only go to vote, it is NECESSARY. AGAINST. For you will not come, they will vote for you. Believe me, I was not in the same commission. And he ran for three times already (although I needed it?) Here is an example from last year. With a remote ballot box (no observers were taken — no place was found in the car), 3 (seventy-two) addresses (most of the private houses) were bypassed in 72 HOURS and voted on. Ours then ran selectively - one house burned down. they were very surprised at one more address; nobody came to them and they were going to vote on the polling station. Pay a courtesy visit. The more it comes and says no to this bullshit, the harder it is to drag it through. This is a civic position - not hiding in the bushes.
          1. Romey 26 March 2020 09: 03 New
            • 20
            • 4
            +16
            A colleague, this is so of course plus still dead souls, but still it seems to me that the main fraud starts in TECs with protocols. There, with the appearance and with the number of votes of incomprehensibility and strangeness. In general, they will consider it right and who needs it. If we talk about the boycott, the main plus is a breakdown in the appearance of a “single impulse”, the main minus is the difficulty of implementation, because there they will begin to drive away “Putin’s guard”, teachers, medical workers, and other cluttered budget small things that are used to fulfilling the will of the authorities thoroughly either out of habit, or, more often, because of “no matter what happens” ... These are the paradoxes that the most humiliated and disenfranchised part of society is the most devoted to its leader.
          2. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 13: 38 New
            • 15
            • 4
            +11
            Quote: basmach
            basmach (Konstantin)


            Kostya, hi! With all due respect, I won’t go to vote.
            I explain my position, as a Citizen I consider the holding of this vote absolutely illegitimate and I am not going to create an extras. For almost 30 years I went to the polls, I have always been against 1991 of Putinism against ebnism, I have never shared them and considered them a whole. And now I won’t go and by this I declare a boycott of the authorities.
            But if someone guesses to declare a rally, a strike, a strike, a protest on the election day, then I will come in the forefront, but not to TIU, but to the square. soldier
            1. Honest Citizen 26 March 2020 14: 21 New
              • 9
              • 4
              +5
              Hello Valera.
              I admit you were right. And in the year 14 and after. Forgive me, fool.
              1. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 16: 22 New
                • 10
                • 2
                +8
                Quote: Honest Citizen
                Honest Citizen (Sergey)

                Come on, Seryoga, everyone is mistaken, the main thing you understand what and when you were wrong or rather mistaken. The worst thing is that here half does not understand or does not want to understand what is happening and what will happen to them next.
                I shake my hand, Seryoga! good drinks
                1. Honest Citizen 26 March 2020 16: 30 New
                  • 10
                  • 6
                  +4
                  The worst thing is that the same methods are now being applied for the mass fooling of the population that have been tested in Ukraine. There, not all at once, all these shortcomings got out of nowhere. The same thing is happening here, only under "patriotic" slogans.
                  And this is scary.
                  1. bayard 28 March 2020 08: 40 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Sergei, do you remember when and under what conditions the current constitution was adopted?
                    Who wrote it and ruled?
                    And what did this lead to?
                    But I still feel uneasy from the memories.
                    But I had a chance to talk with some deputies of the shot Supreme Council, and with the defenders of that building, and with the Vympel group officers who, together with Alpha, stopped that massacre in the center of Moscow and took the deputies to their buses the base is under guard, for they learned that Yeltsin ordered not a single deputy to be left alive ...
                    Aren't you scared for those events?
                    But it was just after them and under the pressure of those events that the new “Constitution” was adopted in a fire order, according to which the Great, and now just Russia, still lives before it ...
                    Are you really so happy with this document, compiled by the US CIA, that you are ready for any sabotage, if only not to correct the crime committed then?
                    Think about it, the vote is postponed anyway because of the epidemic. Leisurely . Work with the primary sources, study the question ...
                    Inexperienced citizens of Russia, and then caught on emotions, turned their heads in a series of bloody events and lies ...
                    Do not repeat the old mistakes of the older generation. Then I myself was still young, did not know everything and did not understand everything.
                    Are you sure that Putin is evil, and there are holy people on Ekho Moskvy?
                    You have not noticed how much your emotional opinion coincides with the opinion of enemies?
                    Real, historical, proven and matted enemies.
                    Doesn't it seem STRANGE to you?
                    Don't you just want to sit down and think about the nature of your behavior?
                    About the sources of your opinion?
                    How fair and justified is it?
                    What will your initiatives and spiritual impulses lead to?
                    Yes, in such conditions, when an intelligent person thinks in completely different categories ...
                    Do you not understand that no later than the beginning of summer war may break out?
                    The real one is not cinematic.
                    And not far away ...
                    That in recent years the country has been preparing precisely for this - they are preparing for war.
                    And this is not our choice.
                    This is US CHALLENGE.
                    And the intention to break these enslaving agreements means only one thing - THE CHALLENGE IS ACCEPTED BY US.
                    And the question is about the survival of the State and the PEOPLE.
                    No more, no less .
                    Think.
                    There is still time.
          3. snake 26 March 2020 14: 58 New
            • 7
            • 4
            +3
            Quote: basmach
            Only go to vote, it is NECESSARY. AGAINST. For don't come you will vote for you.

            That is, the basmach understands that the voting system in Russia is rotten (vote don’t vote, you’ll get a buoy anyway), but still calls to vote ... Why, you ask? If you don’t come, they will vote for you. You come, you vote against - they write that you are FOR ... Sense in all this whistle? Go to the vote and vote “against” at a vote organized by the crooks themselves? Nonsense, his mother ...
            I repeat once again: those who call to vote and vote AGAINST are Putinists who want to make the picture of the "people's choice" brighter. Do not waste your precious time participating in the legitimization of oligarchic power.
            1. basmach 26 March 2020 20: 35 New
              • 4
              • 2
              +2
              Before you call me "Putinist" - read my previous comments.
          4. New Year day 26 March 2020 20: 25 New
            • 12
            • 2
            +10
            Quote: basmach
            Only go to vote, it is NECESSARY. AGAINST.

            "That’s why bad power rules, while good people sit at home."
        3. BARKHAN 26 March 2020 09: 02 New
          • 20
          • 5
          +15
          Quote: Stroporez
          Anyone will not go to the voting plans

          I’ll go to the vote and vote against. And all my friends I will agitate to vote against. Against the impudence of the scam. This is a sneaky, undisguised scam. In order for the referendum to be correct, there should be an opportunity to vote for each item separately ... then yes, at least some kind of attempt to justice.
          The referendum is now being postponed because the people will be embittered by April 22.
          If you don’t go and vote against, then there will only be more people voting for.
          1. Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 31 New
            • 15
            • 4
            +11
            I fully support your opinion. need to go and vote against! hi
          2. snake 26 March 2020 15: 01 New
            • 6
            • 5
            +1
            Quote: Barkhan
            I’ll go to the vote and vote against. And all my friends I will agitate to vote against. Against the impudence of a scam. This is a vile, undisguised scam.

            And you are ready to go and take part in this scam. Are you so naive that you think you can defeat the scammers in their own game? Or are you a hidden Putinist?
            1. Fan-fan 26 March 2020 20: 27 New
              • 6
              • 2
              +4
              You shouldn’t be so. Here is a simple question about voting that has perplexed us, we all want justice, but we ourselves cannot agree on each other. We are not united, our weakness is not organized in this.
        4. Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 28 New
          • 15
          • 2
          +13
          Quote: Stroporez
          nature itself is against Putin, his corrections and his life-long reign.

          in other words, we have a crisis of power. in this case, it is appropriate to recall the words of Stalin about the crisis of power: "As Marxists, we must approach the crisis of power, not only from a formal point of view, but, above all, from the point of view of the class. The crisis of power is a tense, open struggle of the classes for power."
      4. Poor 27 March 2020 19: 33 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        full version 53 minutes 1960 "I drew a little man"
    3. Finches 26 March 2020 06: 37 New
      • 19
      • 32
      -13
      Well, if such a parsley, then for those who have a future ... - formally, to accept all these amendments, if we carefully read our laws, a decision of the State Duma and the Council of Federations in conjunction with the regional legislatures is enough! But the President decided that let the people do it! Due to the fact that GDP did just that, we are organizing local battles here! And if he had acted like a real usurper of power, we would hardly have known about these amendments, or rather would not have attached much importance ... The Duma accepts 300 amendments a day! About many of them, even deputies do not know! laughing We would live in peace - we would discuss little by little the clowning in Nenko! And so there was a reason for heated discussions with people who have a future, in them you can learn a lot about yourself ... laughing
      1. Malyuta 26 March 2020 07: 01 New
        • 35
        • 10
        +25
        Quote: Finches
        formally, for the adoption of all these amendments, if we carefully read our laws, the decisions of the State Duma and the Council of Federations in conjunction with the regional legislatures are enough! But the President decided that let the people do it!

        All this staged circus performance, in the current scenario, with a manual CEC, in the absence of observers and the possibility of Internet voting, the current president did not risk anything and became life-long, but not entirely legitimate.
        1. Finches 26 March 2020 07: 10 New
          • 19
          • 30
          -11
          I can agree with the circus ... but everything else is not entirely true! Observers will be ordinary people. By the way, when discussing the Stalin Constitution of 1936, more than 6 amendments were submitted from all over the USSR from labor collectives and employees ... - why it was remembered! I now think that under Joseph Vissarionovich, the entire VO site from moderators to privates would have long benefited the country by extracting peat in the swamps of Mordovia! laughing
          1. Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 35 New
            • 19
            • 3
            +16
            Quote: Finches
            I now think that under Joseph Vissarionovich, the entire VO site from moderators to privates would have long benefited the country by extracting peat in the swamps of Mordovia!

            You have a bad opinion about Comrade Stalin, a citizen of finchs. under Joseph Vissarionovich, people like you simply didn’t exist.
            how can you a citizen of finchs drown for Putin, at the same time honor the era of Stalin. What kind of wobble do you have?
            1. alecsis69 28 March 2020 01: 23 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Very understandable, and if you had bothered to take the blinkers off your eyes, you would have noticed how painfully Putin is trying to turn the state on a different course, despite the sabotage of the bureaucratic apparatus, which was planted and carefully cultivated back in the 90s. And you live by the principle "I am an old woman and I don’t believe anyone."
      2. Svarog 26 March 2020 07: 10 New
        • 33
        • 12
        +21
        And do it like a real usurper of power

        To the point .. or in another way, another coup took place .. In favor of the oligarchs ..
        1. Freeman 26 March 2020 17: 43 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Svarog
          And do it like a real usurper of power

          To the point .. or in another way, another coup took place .. In favor of the oligarchs ..

          And your reluctance to use the right granted to you ( still ) say "NO!" - You decided to "silently" support this coup.

          Silent means consent.
          From the Latin: Silentium videtur confessio (Silentium Videtur Confessio |.
          From the message of Pope Boniface VIII (1294-1303), which was included in canon law (a set of decisions of the highest authority in the Roman Catholic Church).
          1. Svarog 26 March 2020 19: 13 New
            • 11
            • 2
            +9
            Quote: Freeman
            And his reluctance to use the right granted to you (for now) to say "NO!" - You decided to "silently" support this coup.

            And the point is to go .. observers will not be a plus and Internet voting, they will draw what they need, but here at least there will be no turnout ..
        2. Finches 26 March 2020 18: 52 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Here's a zagagulin .... laughing
      3. Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 59 New
        • 31
        • 5
        +26
        Quote: Finches
        But the President decided that let the people do it! Due to the fact that GDP did just that, we are organizing local battles here!

        -Well prince Ah, yes, Marshal, well, an eagle!
        - At once he took trouble from us!
        “And look how simple it is!”

        Wow, eh, ma ... If we knew something before ... But how to make a potion?
        I did just that! Came here! He said just that! And what of all this contributed to the prosperity of the Fatherland? WHAT?
        Could change quietly, and people would swallow ... fool Are you out of your mind? They came to him and, after all decisions taken without popular consent, they said:
        Rise, king of hope! Huh? You can’t rule while lying down.

        That’s why such a leapfrog (for this circus cannot be called a planned event in high-speed reproduction).
        And you, having lived to mature (I hope) years, are still trying to bring some kind of high understanding and wisdom of decisions under worthless efforts ...
        The chair cracked! The people are simply tired of listening to these Putin mantras, after which nothing changes for the better for ordinary people.
        ALREADY 20 YEARS !!!
        1. flicker 26 March 2020 23: 45 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          The people are simply tired of listening to these Putin mantras, after which nothing changes for the better for ordinary people.
          ALREADY 20 YEARS !!!
          You probably communicate with the Ukrainian people?
          Nothing is changing for the better ?! I well remember how in 90 salaries or did not pay, or paid after 3 months, or paid with frozen fish, or vodka.
          Now of course there are still many problems, but 20 years ago it was much worse.
          1. Finches 27 March 2020 06: 30 New
            • 2
            • 3
            -1
            They won’t hear you - it’s a zombie - everything is bad, with ... rashka, rolling in with ... g ... - it's rude, of course, but somewhere like that! Good people, but for some reason they see only negative! There is enough real negativity in the country, but a lot of useful things have been done. I always remember the 90s - total devastation. The people did not live, but survived, but today it is still worse ... Our man cannot be pleased laughing
            1. flicker 30 March 2020 16: 10 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Our man can not please

              That's for sure. Some of them are just trollites (rabid Russophobes), the other part - they got lost in three pine trees, and they are confident in their innocence, not understanding and not seeing how they are bred. They reject any manipulation of themselves from the outside, since "they themselves see with their own eyes all the shortcomings in the country." And it is precisely on this that they are caught. The technology is something like this: there is a glass half empty and half full at the same time. Everyone sees him the same way.
              And then they begin to convince them: you see, the glass is almost empty, although it should have been filled. Why is it empty? Yes, because it’s N.'s friends who emptied him, you see how much money they have, and look how much you have? Until N. is removed we will. And the fact that there is a glass, so soon they will stomp it and you and your children will not get anything.
              In short, we go out and knocking helmets, remove N. and life will immediately become a fairy tale. Well, you want life to become a fairy tale? Yes, I want to!
              They help to tear down N., after which not only half of the contents in the glass will remain, but also the glass itself.
              + + +
              So it was in the beginning of 90 when miners pounded helmets (for the sake of improving their lives) - in the end, they helped to destroy the country.
              The same thing is happening in Ukraine today.
              There, it also seemed to them that they all saw and understood.
              So we, like people are not bad, rightly complain about difficulties, but at the same time offer measures that will destroy the country.
              Just like a zombie.
            2. grad2308 31 March 2020 09: 58 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              "Our man will not please you"
              You contradict yourself, the army was better in the USSR — personnel were better than “jackets”. The devastation is 90, and now the "dawn". Example: the n-th garment factory in a provincial town, survived in the troubled years, due to the appreciation of the dollar in 1999, began working with foreign companies on tolling raw materials, the average headcount for 2004 was 2400 people. Naturally, the time when the company was taking over, Sberbank did not give money (credit) to buy shares from pensioners. The “other investor” came up with bankruptcy. Now the average number of employees with engineering and technical staff is 120 people. I can give you such examples in the sewing industry in the region, how much is left and how and how much it works (which is the number of enterprises and number). Provincial cities have turned to the cities where old people live with their grandchildren and their parents earn money in Moscow or in the North, and Moscow, too, now took refuge in jobs after 2014 ... When the state left the planned economy to the "market", it did not regulate import duties, simply “banged” many industries and industries, making it possible to “tear apart” the legacy of the Soviet past. And you with a mantra, what are your achievements !!!! Do you decide who gave the Oath? There are no achievements of socialism - where is decent medicine and education (in the highest - quotas for free seats.) The level of average affordable has fallen catastrophically. Of the enterprises in the bulk "the military" has survived, but they are also being optimized. Where products from non-military enterprises - either Asia, or components from Asia. There is NO full production cycle!
      4. aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 01 New
        • 19
        • 2
        +17
        Quote: Finches
        But the President decided that let the people do it!

        what will the people do? will deprive someone of real estate in the warmer lands? The people are FOR !!! The Duma decided that it is possible to have real estate. And the laws of any country allow property owners to use it, hence the simplified procedure for obtaining visas and citizenship, all in vain! wassat
        Quote: Finches
        And do it like a real usurper of power

        The conductor is brilliant. Or an artist by whom Oscar cries. An atmosphere has been created in Russia when practically everything can be said, in this cacophony no reasonable opinions are heard, and decisions are made in the interests of big money. Here he is again good, proposed amendments, and the Duma changed them, the people choose the Duma, which means he is to blame! wassat
        1. flicker 26 March 2020 23: 50 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          In Russia, an atmosphere is created when you can talk almost everything
          Okay to say, you can write articles calling to ruin the state.
          The United States allocated 80 billion rubles for the needs of these hacks.
          Here they add fuel to the fire.
      5. basmach 26 March 2020 08: 46 New
        • 14
        • 2
        +12
        Why do you need to find out about yourself. You’re our patriot (Roman just wrote about such people). "The big giraffe, he knows better." Tomorrow the wind will blow the other way and you will go there too. Weather vane (I wrote about you for a long time).
        1. Finches 27 March 2020 06: 37 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Of course, you can write, there will be no demand, but most likely you are just not a very smart person! It’s better to be a patriot like me than a blinded horse like you ... And Roman, 5 years ago, when, by the way, I sent parcels to Donbass through him, I wrote a little differently. hi
      6. flicker 26 March 2020 23: 54 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Well, if such a parsley, then for those who have a future ... - formally, to accept all these amendments, if we carefully read our laws, a decision of the State Duma and the Council of Federations in conjunction with the regional legislatures is enough! But the President decided that let the people do it! Due to the fact that GDP did just that, we are organizing local battles here! And if he had acted like a real usurper of power, we would hardly have known about these amendments, or rather would not have attached much importance ... The Duma accepts 300 amendments a day! About many of them, even deputies do not know! We would live in peace - we would discuss little by little the clowning in Nenko! And so there was a reason for heated discussions with people who have a future, in them you can learn a lot about yourself ...
        Grant-eaters fiddled, and therefore I ply you with the text good
    4. Malyuta 26 March 2020 06: 56 New
      • 24
      • 10
      +14
      Quote: Aerodrome
      disguised as good amendments, coupled with nonsense, and frank fad "for themselves."

      There is nothing normal in poravak, including a mere $ 20 in poverty eradication.
      Quote: Aerodrome
      let them bear it ... I’m not coming. I decided. it makes no sense to play with someone who has three aces up his sleeve.

      I absolutely agree with this thesis; I’m not going to participate in the Putin’s circus on lifetime canonization!
    5. siberalt 26 March 2020 07: 19 New
      • 28
      • 3
      +25
      Strong article. Respect to the author! By and large, discussions on constitutional (state) law are best conducted by legal experts, and even those who understand a lot about this branch of law. Formulate a law, and even reduce it to a separate institution (codify) is no weaker than building an icebreaker from a project to launch. In addition, every right-wing act must be calculated from many points, starting with financial, political public perception and much, much more. As far as I remember, the construction of legal norms under the Soviets was taught only at two faculties - Moscow State University and the Saratov State, specializing in Soviet construction. Are there any such analogues now? I don’t know. It seems that now everyone is writing laws, and there would be a post, at least a deputy of the State Duma. And who we all see there. Singers, artists, boxers and other "specialists" are legal scholars. As for the current amendments, they basically boil down to a redistribution of power under the guise of social benefits, which no one interfered with twenty years ago. But it has already been announced that the interest on bank deposits of pensioners, who dared to save a million wooden (almost half as much as Nabiullina's worth), was sanded out for a funeral, maintaining health in an emergency, and “free education” for grandchildren.
      Good mood to you all! How we lived and we will live.
      1. Stas157 26 March 2020 07: 57 New
        • 28
        • 5
        +23
        Quote: siberalt
        Strong article. Respect to the author!

        Well, as usual! The author addresses the most painful topics. And usually under his articles always most comments. Thanks to Roman for his courage. Writing such articles, and then experiencing a hail of rudeness (from some who disagree) is not a simple matter. But rating authors have no other way.
        1. depressant 26 March 2020 08: 38 New
          • 21
          • 2
          +19
          Yes, the written word hurts. Much more painful than said aloud in the face. He said and ran away laughing, and you spat ...
          Roman, hold on!
          Our whole life is a bad amendment from the 90s.
      2. Freeman 26 March 2020 09: 39 New
        • 10
        • 1
        +9
        sibiralt Today, 07:19
        How we lived and we will live.


        No, it won’t work out.
        In fact, it is stated that those who receive more minimum wages are "wealthy citizens".
        - "17 thousand - middle class"
        - "You have a million - you are in 1% of the elect."
        The thesis is implemented - "Population - new oil."
        The bar for the definition of "superprofits" is lowered to take the "luxury tax" from the wider population.
      3. Stirbjorn 26 March 2020 10: 03 New
        • 12
        • 1
        +11
        Quote: siberalt
        But it has already been announced that the interest on bank deposits of pensioners, who dared to save a million wooden (almost half as much as Nabiullina's worth), was sanded out for a funeral, maintaining health in an emergency, and “free education” for grandchildren.
        I agree, where did they get upstairs that a million rubles is a lot of money - you can’t buy an apartment for them, and now you can buy a normal car. Type do not save citizens, and take loans at predatory interest! They continue to drive people into debt slavery. It’s like introducing a progressive tax starting at 30 thousand per month
      4. flicker 27 March 2020 00: 36 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        Strong article. Respect to the author!

        I will disappoint you, the author very poorly understands what he writes about. For example, this pearl:
        It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution prescribethat international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems.

        For the majority (not even lawyers) of those who have tried at least once, it is obvious that almost everything in court depends on the INTERPRETATION of what is recorded.
        And therefore all sorts of little things should be spelled out.
        Once again: SIGN UP!

        And write this:
        It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution prescribethat international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems
        maybe only a complete layman.
    6. Freeman 26 March 2020 08: 39 New
      • 11
      • 1
      +10
      Quote: Aerodrome
      About the new Constitution of the Russian Federation: comments
      The novel, in general, is right, this will be a new constitution (there will be no doubt that it will be doubted, everything is done, the “cosmetics” remains.) And of course, the horror that the “referendum” is “a package” - “yes, with two” with quotation marks "... good amendments are masked, coupled with nonsense, and frank fonts" for themselves ". let them carry ...not coming. decided. it makes no sense to play with someone who has three aces up his sleeve.


      And come and at least try to “turn the ombre table”, weak?
      - “Beat sharpies with candelabra,” until I urge.
      1. flicker 27 March 2020 00: 39 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Yes there is no "new Constitution", there are amendments to the Constitution. The author wrote without thinking, and they repeat everything like parrots. yes
        1. Freeman 27 March 2020 01: 03 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          Quote: flicker
          Yes there is no "new Constitution", there are amendments to the Constitution. The author wrote without thinking, and they repeat everything like parrots. yes

          Yeah. yes
          34 amendments amending 9 articles of the Constitution, including the establishment of a new authority (state council), a change in the federal structure (federal lands), a change in the distribution of power between branches of government - this is so, "commas rearranged".
    7. Civil 26 March 2020 09: 52 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Stop chatter! The result is well known.
      1. Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 40 New
        • 11
        • 1
        +10
        Quote: Civil
        The result is well known.

        Share the result, but at the same time where you got such data from.
    8. Galleon 26 March 2020 11: 18 New
      • 15
      • 6
      +9
      Quote: Aerodrome
      not coming. decided.

      Here are all those here who are against the amendments and say that they will not vote, I turn to them:
      - Guys, have you sharply weakened your mind, or what? Well, don’t go - they will vote for you. THERE ARE ONLY AND NEEDED FOR THOSE WHO AGAINST DO NOT VOTE. SOLVING EVERYTHING WILL BE A SIMPLE BALANCE OF VOTES.
      What are you doing, smart and good !?
      1. Vadim237 26 March 2020 12: 36 New
        • 3
        • 9
        -6
        They have long since, even with 91 sharply stupefied and lost in space.
        1. Galleon 26 March 2020 12: 43 New
          • 11
          • 2
          +9
          Well, I'm not prone to such a sharp assessment. We are all deceived since 1991. Cheated, not stupefied. We lived in a society in the basis of which was declared and there was some kind of trust, there was an appeal "comrade". And we were not ready for the deceit that was done with us. Therefore, it is also unlawful for us now to deceive us to take responsibility for what happened then. How can you be guilty of what you knew nothing about, guilty of trusting? This is now over 30 years taught to check.
          1. flicker 27 March 2020 00: 45 New
            • 1
            • 4
            -3
            We are all deceived since 1991. Cheated, not stupefied

            And now they do not deceive us?
            The United States allocated 80 billion rubles to support Russian grant eaters and grant pumps.
            Normal money. Here are the "smart" for whom the future is trying. bully
      2. aleksejkabanets 26 March 2020 12: 40 New
        • 13
        • 2
        +11
        Voting has no legal force. And I think they know the attitude of the people to power. (V.V. Putin’s appeal on coronovirus, on RT - 13 thousand likes and 20 thousand dislikes. Comments are tough.)
        1. Galleon 26 March 2020 12: 48 New
          • 12
          • 2
          +10
          Regnum voted on its website for amendments. Against it was about 60%.
          1. aleksejkabanets 26 March 2020 12: 55 New
            • 10
            • 2
            +8
            A lot of people who are not friends with the Internet, they believe in the TV. Putin added a pension and more. And the bulk of people are very inert.
        2. flicker 27 March 2020 00: 48 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Voting has no legal force.
          Yes, legally, 2/3 of the Duma and 3/4 of the Federation Council and the president’s signature are enough to pass the amendments.
      3. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 17: 11 New
        • 10
        • 1
        +9
        Quote: Galleon
        DO NOT VOTE

        Is this a vote, Andrey? In accordance with what laws is it carried out? Here is a list of federal laws that determine the procedure for referenda and elections - http://www.cikrf.ru/law/federal_law/.
        This "Survey" is conducted in full isolation from all Federal Laws. Neither adequate control, nor certainty in timing. So is it worth blaming people for not wanting to participate in a farce?
        1. Galleon 26 March 2020 17: 35 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          Igor, in short, yes - this is an approved lawlessness, and the second yes - you must vote to vote in order to somehow try to stop this lawlessness. Let it fail. But let those who started this lawlessness achieve their goals by deceit and forgery, and not by the results of voting and our silence on it.
          1. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 18: 57 New
            • 8
            • 1
            +7
            Quote: Galleon
            and secondly, yes - it’s necessary to vote, in order to somehow try to stop this lawlessness

            Three weeks ago, the same convinced everyone. But after specifying the details, he changed his mind. request But I’ll definitely go to the next elections, and I think we’ll push the “beloved” EP, because now even my mother, who has always voted for Putin, is now opposed.
            1. Galleon 26 March 2020 19: 39 New
              • 5
              • 2
              +3
              I usually always see you as my like-minded drinks but, of course, some disagreements are possible and normal. Health to your mom! hi
          2. flicker 27 March 2020 00: 50 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            at least somehow try to stop this lawlessness.
            Amendments to the Constitution is that "lawlessness"?
            1. Revival 27 March 2020 12: 51 New
              • 3
              • 4
              -1
              I think that the lawlessness that is mentioned in the comments, this means how the amendments are adopted, that the rules are completely violated, a vote is not prescribed by the constitution (law).
              It seems that the very constitution says that changes to the constitution (some of the articles, and they are affected) are introduced only in two ways: a referendum or a Constituent Assembly.
              Which of these procedures is applied? None.
              And it seems that no vote is provided for by the constitution.
              See the conclusion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the amendments, they, too, could not think of anything about the justification, not prescribed by law, of the voting procedure, except that this vote has its own legal nature, so to speak, you need to understand
              1. flicker 27 March 2020 15: 02 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                that changes to the constitution (some of the articles, and they are affected) are introduced only in two ways: a referendum or a constituent assembly.

                I don’t know what articles you are talking about, but for the adoption of amendments to the Constitution, it is enough to get 2/3 of the Duma, 3/4 of the Federation Council and the president’s signature.
                And no, not just referenda, but just polls are not needed.
        2. Revival 27 March 2020 12: 44 New
          • 3
          • 4
          -1
          Absolutely.
          The Constitutional Court was forced to write about this in its opinion on the constitutionality of the amendments: “this vote has its own legal nature”)))
          "His nationality was, own, Macedonian and period" (c).
        3. Lekz 31 March 2020 16: 51 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          This "Survey" is conducted in full isolation from all Federal Laws.

          You're right. Interrogation by laws and the Constitution is not provided. All legal amendment procedures have already been completed. Dot. It remains to sign the law on amendments to the President. And to understand that something necessary is being done, he wants to know the opinion of people. For understanding only, and he has long had legal grounds. Everyone can express their opinion. It has no legal relation to referenda and elections.
      4. Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 07 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        What are we doing? The main thing is who will count the votes. She (the authorities) didn’t give a damn about how anyone voted, they would write the right amount.
        Do not forget they allowed electronic voting in case it is obvious that the people did not come to the polling stations, people will say that they were safe and all voted for the updated Constitution.
        And the cameras that were put specifically at the last election will not work, so people can’t evaluate the turnout.
        So the government will approve its own Constitution.
        And thus finally put an end to itself. But Putin’s image is not important, he’s not enough to sit in his lifetime ...
    9. iouris 26 March 2020 23: 10 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Roman, in general, is right,

      What is he right about? Quote: "Think. For smart people, perhaps the future." The end of the quote. Is this a call to whom? British scientists have proven that 95% of the population (Britain, of course) are more likely to shoot themselves than they will start to think, and only 2,5% think what they think. Statistics, however.
      1. flicker 27 March 2020 00: 55 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        Quote: "Think. For smart people, perhaps the future." The end of the quote. Is this a call to whom?

        It seems to me that the author suggests enriching while there is an opportunity.
        Well, there is evidence that the United States allocated 80 billion rubles to support grant-eaters.
        Maybe the author meant it?
    10. flicker 26 March 2020 23: 31 New
      • 1
      • 5
      -4
      there will be a new constitution (there will be no doubt that everything will be doubted, everything has been done, the “cosmetics” remains.) and of course, the horror is that the “referendum” is “package” - yes, with two “quotation marks”.

      Not the new Constitution (this is the author who called it that because of great knowledge), but the amendments to the Constitution are absolutely correct, they will be adopted because they answer the basic requests of society and the society will vote for them.
      At the expense of the “package” - did we really accept the current Constitution article by article or as a whole?
      In general, in the vast majority of countries, the constitution is adopted by elected persons (national assemblies, parliaments, etc.). So when we adopted even the current Constitution, the will of the people was direct.
      At the expense of the "referendum"
      To accept amendments to the Constitution of the authorities, it was enough to get 2/3 of the vote in the Duma, 3/4 of the vote in the Federation Council and the signature of the president.
      Not just a “referendum,” but not even a survey was required.
      ***
      But the government (represented by Putin) decided to give us the opportunity to express our opinion (opinion affects the adoption of amendments) to us.
      And we begin to whine.
    11. Campanella 27 March 2020 22: 57 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Similarly, I decided not to go to these elections, I see no reason.
      By the way, in the American constitution, the US president cannot change his salary.
      And ours is constantly throwing money allowances on ourselves and our okhlokrats, these are such slaves in galleys.
    12. Lekz 31 March 2020 17: 01 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      this is a new constitution will

      The old one, which will be amended to make it less "brutal."
  2. Ilya-spb 26 March 2020 05: 52 New
    • 18
    • 58
    -40
    What is international law and liberal values ​​- we see in Europe, especially in Italy. Against the background of coronovirus. And that’s it.

    Here interests me:
    1) normal life in Russia.

    2) normal work in Russia.

    Yes, I'm selfish.

    Agree, I can get this with the liberals, if I accept their rules of the game, and I will live like a wolf. And in a social state. And in today's Russia.

    But why? Why I do not want to achieve these goals wolfish (liberal)? Why do I want to work honestly and calmly?

    PS And Mr. Skomorokhov is engaged in demagogy and boltology.
    1. Valery Valery 26 March 2020 06: 28 New
      • 19
      • 62
      -43
      It makes no sense to comment and argue with the author of the article and all the like. Both this article and all the “liberal” statements of the last month are an awareness of their loss. The Gozmans and Chubais realized that the people of Russia had escaped from the captivity of their ideas and were beginning to panic about this.
      In addition to all of the above, funding from abroad was reduced - another offense.
      1. Oleg Skvortsov 26 March 2020 09: 01 New
        • 25
        • 8
        +17
        Valery, how old are you? look like a victim of an ege with brain Putinism. Although, if you grew up under the current regime and a good life milk yield, then for you the life-long consolidation of a permanent rower in galleys with his grown bureaucratic and oligarchic lawlessness and corruption is good.
        1. Valery Valery 26 March 2020 10: 36 New
          • 10
          • 24
          -14
          No, I didn’t take the exam and I finished school normally, back in the 80s. Therefore, there is something to compare. And you continue to be poisoned by your own poisonous hatred - your time of demagogy and sophism has passed.
          1. Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 54 New
            • 17
            • 4
            +13
            Quote: Valery Valery
            finished school normal,

            sorry but not like that.
            Quote: Valery Valery
            back in the 80s. Therefore, there is something to compare

            interesting, and what exactly are you comparing?
            Quote: Valery Valery
            And you continue to be poisoned by your own poisonous hatred - your time of demagogy and sophism has passed.

            request
            all this is what you wrote, more to you
        2. Vadim237 26 March 2020 12: 50 New
          • 4
          • 13
          -9
          You don’t worry, Putin will leave in the year 2024, whether Mishustin will replace someone from the GRU at the age of 72 that it will be difficult for him to control the state — he will be given a manor in Moscow and politicians and journalists will come to him from all over Russia and the world to interview him other figures will write an autobiographical book and continue to live without straining, but billionaires as they were in Russia will remain so - the market economy will not go anywhere.
      2. depressant 26 March 2020 09: 04 New
        • 27
        • 2
        +25
        I am sad because life has been reduced to simple survival due to the multiplication of good in moshna - not in the heads, not in the feelings ...
        And now it rushes: “Yes, I am selfish!”, - as old as the world. Read Chekhov, selfish guys. He talked for a long time about people who like you to eat, eat sweetly, and increase his goodness in moshne. Without thinking that sweet sleep and delicious food - due to the deprivation of your animal greed and strength of the beast of the majority.
        Sometimes a wolf appeared in a flock of sheep and cut it all. Although one is enough for saturation. But we are not sheep - remember from this.
      3. AK1972 26 March 2020 12: 05 New
        • 14
        • 2
        +12
        Quote: Valery Valery
        Both this article and all the “liberal” statements of the last month are an awareness of their loss. The Gozmans and Chubais realized that the people of Russia had escaped from the captivity of their ideas and were beginning to panic about this.

        I did not see the chubais panic. Does he lead a state corporation, or am I mistaken? the gozman also feels rather well playing the "liberal". Everyone has a place in the sun under the current regime. Some even give Hero labor. So stop carrying enchanting nonsense.
    2. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 47 New
      • 22
      • 4
      +18
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      Here interests me:
      1) normal life in Russia.
      2) normal work in Russia.

      And where is all this in Russia?
    3. kjhg 26 March 2020 09: 24 New
      • 18
      • 3
      +15
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      Yes, I'm selfish.

      Agree, I can get this with the liberals, if I accept their rules of the game, and I will live like a wolf. And in a social state. And in today's Russia.

      The punishment for civic passivity and selfishness is the power of villains Plato. 500 BC Do you want to .. fate? Thousands of years ago, smart people said that you ... you only yourself
      1. Ilya-spb 26 March 2020 17: 59 New
        • 2
        • 6
        -4
        I am not a supporter of Plato. And I’m not going to prove anything to anyone.

        By the way, I am one of the few on this site who does not hide his face under the guise of an avatar)
    4. Vadim237 26 March 2020 12: 42 New
      • 4
      • 15
      -11
      Man to man is a wolf - the law of nature weak perishes strong survive human society will never lose this even under socialism even under capitalism, greed and envy will always be to a lesser or greater extent. With this you have to measure whether you want it or not.
      1. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 13: 00 New
        • 19
        • 3
        +16
        Quote: Vadim237
        Man to man is a wolf - the law of nature weak perishes strong survive human society will never lose this even under socialism even under capitalism, greed and envy will always be to a lesser or greater extent. With this you have to measure whether you want it or not.

        And here you pissed me off Vadimka! Strongly pissed off!
        But tell me about the human wolf, how people shared the last food and clothes, covered other people with their bodies, how they took completely stranded orphans after the war, how scientists saved the seed fund in besieged Leningrad. Remember for the rest of your life that there was such a proud name Soviet Man!
        I’ll tell you more that the generation born from 1917 to 1926 was the generation of Soviet people of the future builders of Communism, and if it weren’t for the war that mowed these generations, I would almost completely clean them up, we would still have a completely different country!
        Threat. You deserve the minus and not even one!
        Look at this:


    5. flicker 27 March 2020 00: 57 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      PS And Mr. Skomorokhov is engaged in demagogy and boltology.
      Maybe, maybe banal commerce.
    6. Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 16 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      This is you a demagogue and I would say
      unscrupulous man, normal work, normal life ...
      Is the minimum wage a normal wage? Cost of living, macaroni is your norm?
  3. Pessimist22 26 March 2020 06: 00 New
    • 42
    • 12
    +30
    I remember that in 14-15, Putin was praised in all articles on the site, and in the comments, if someone tried to reason soberly about him, then he didn’t have a lot of minuses, black shoulder straps and a ban, and five years have passed since everything changed, the future for smart people.
    1. _Sergei_ 26 March 2020 06: 13 New
      • 21
      • 58
      -37
      Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt. If they were not, then there is nothing to add.
      1. DMB 75 26 March 2020 06: 42 New
        • 39
        • 13
        +26
        Life experience has increased over 20 years. We see what is happening around. Nothing good, in short. Although it is useless for you to say anything, everything is fine with you and life has been successful. But not everyone is living that far.
        1. Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 07: 03 New
          • 25
          • 48
          -23
          Quote: DMB 75
          , everything is fine with you and your life has been successful. But not everyone is living that far.

          Life is really different for everyone. Someone succeeded, someone did not. But, our president, V.V. Putin, has clearly stated everything for which amendments to the constitution are needed. Now, during the period of the outbreak of the global crisis and in the conditions of encircling Russia with enemies, in the conditions of foreign policy hard pressure, in conditions of internal political instability, when all kinds of offended people are rushing to power, we must unite around the Leader of our country. Whenever a threat arose, our people united. Now this is the situation when the people of our Great Country need to unite and jointly support decisions on the transformation of Russia and its well-being for the sake of us and our descendants. It is necessary to end disputes, abuse and especially rudeness regarding the president. You need to understand that Vladimir Vladimirovich is trying to help the people of Russia survive the difficult time safely, and he needs our support!
          1. polar fox 26 March 2020 07: 47 New
            • 30
            • 11
            +19
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            You need to understand that Vladimir Vladimirovich is trying to help the people of Russia survive the difficult time safely, and he needs our support!

            cool ... pomp, damn it ... and what kind of "people" does he actually help? New "heroes of labor"?
            1. Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 08: 04 New
              • 18
              • 36
              -18
              To the citizens of Russia! Did you watch his performance yesterday?
              1. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 49 New
                • 26
                • 10
                +16
                Quote: Sergey Olegovich
                To the citizens of Russia! Did you watch his performance yesterday?

                In addition to presentations and promises, can you give an example of assistance to Russian citizens?
                1. Fan-fan 26 March 2020 21: 04 New
                  • 7
                  • 1
                  +6
                  Yes, he helped a lot, he took away pensions for 5 years in advance.
                  1. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 23: 34 New
                    • 5
                    • 1
                    +4
                    Quote: Fan-Fan
                    Yes, he helped a lot, he took away pensions for 5 years in advance.

                    I then calculated at leisure - the minimum pension is 11 thousand rubles, for 5 years = 660 thousand rubles. This is the minimum amount that the beloved GDP threw everyone.
              2. Revival 27 March 2020 13: 02 New
                • 3
                • 3
                0
                We have already watched many performances.
                "As long as I'm president ...
                Please treat with understanding ... "and the point.
            2. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 08: 05 New
              • 28
              • 9
              +19
              Quote: polar fox
              and to what "people" does he actually help? New "heroes of labor"?

              Glory to the new hero! Plato must be renamed Rotenberg, well, and the town of some kind of district thread in Rotenberg grad, and the regional one in St. Putenburg, perpetuate the names of the heronves, well, and canonize.
          2. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 47 New
            • 35
            • 14
            +21
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            But, our president, V.V. Putin, has clearly stated everything for which amendments to the constitution are needed. Now, during the period of the outbreak of the global crisis and in the conditions of encircling Russia with enemies, in conditions of foreign policy hard pressure, in conditions of internal political instability, when all kinds of offenders are torn to power, we must unite around the Leader of our country

            Meditating, if you consider that the leader himself created the crisis, then you should stay away from this and rally with him his work heroes. I’m kind of a little ashamed to say.
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            the people of our Great country must unite and jointly support decisions on the transformation of Russia and its well-being for the sake of us and our descendants

            Another 5 years of Putinism and the country simply will not be.
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            You need to understand that Vladimir Vladimirovich is trying to help the people of Russia survive the difficult time safely, and he needs our support!

            You, my colleague, are not doing something good for them, I personally will not accept any fate in the genocide of the peoples of Russia, but on the contrary I will oppose as much as I can.
            Get me fat Mendel, sign it !!!
            1. Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 08: 15 New
              • 18
              • 37
              -19
              So the main liberal appeared on the site. Gaspadin is a liberal, change your profile from Boy to Mazepa. Not a "Bolshevik" you. Fat Mendel is all you can do. If you, like the supporter of the Communists, you should know that the Communist Party is against all liberalism and for the integrity of our state. And I, as a supporter of the Communist Party, tell you, do not disgrace the movement, change the profile. It is because of such liberals hiding under the guise of communists that we have a crisis in the communist movement.
              You write that you do not want to participate in the genocide, but allow, what you are calling for is the genocide of the people.
              We created the crisis artificially. We are not to blame for the crisis.
              About the board another 5 years made fun, amused. Only the people in the elections will decide who will be the next president of our country by voting for candidates.
              1. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 53 New
                • 25
                • 5
                +20
                Quote: Sergey Olegovich
                We created the crisis artificially. We are not to blame for the crisis.

                Not us, really. But it was our government that did everything to ensure that the crisis brought down the economy. As usual, winter unexpectedly began here. If you invest national funds in the economies of other countries, yours will not develop, others will develop. This is an axiom.
              2. balunn 26 March 2020 09: 10 New
                • 22
                • 4
                +18
                Well, to begin with, it was under the current government that the integrity of our state was violated. Domansky Island and the Viking shelf
                Increasing retirement age and low pensions - what is it?
              3. aybolyt678 26 March 2020 09: 11 New
                • 10
                • 4
                +6
                Quote: Sergey Olegovich
                Communist Party against any liberalism and for the integrity of our state.

                Rabinovich was always against (the phrase from the movie "The weather is good on Deribasovskaya ..."
                The CPRF today is the self-name of a group of consumers of the benefits of power. Drive out on populism. Where is the ideology of the communists? where are the underground ??? smile
              4. Vadim237 26 March 2020 13: 44 New
                • 4
                • 15
                -11
                The crisis was not created for you artificially by the Soviet leadership systematically starting in the 50s, distorting the economy towards the military-industrial complex, relegating everything else to the background accelerating the arms race on the basis of the Second World War, the more weapons we rivet the better, and so until the mid-80s, then they began to put 120 countries on the neck beggars should be helped by friendly regimes and they helped everyone they could at their own expense under this business by increasing production party leaders in the republics promoted projects some of which were initially unprofitable but they didn’t consider the money we said. In the civilian sector, it became worse every year with the implementation of the plan since the military-industrial complex took away materials, equipment and engineers, due to the lack of modern food equipment inside the country, they started exporting tens of billions of dollars of foreign money, it needed a currency where, of course, first of all, oil sales in the 70s oil production skyrocketed and continued to increase from year to year began to spend gold reserves, and in the 80s the country began to run out of money costs oil fell the cost of the war in Afghanistan added Chernobyl US put a loaded pistol in the temple of the USSR in the form of Pershing missiles 2 in Europe, and Gorbachev realized that the USSR no longer had the means to continue the Cold War and went to the INF Treaty, and then wherever he went everywhere, he could increase prices, you couldn’t reduce spending on the republics, you couldn’t continue throwing from corner to corner with rash decisions publicity, anti-alcohol law and there’s no money to get from how much from export whether they spent the same amount of money and Hunchback ran for foreign loans from the beginning to the banks and then to the leaderships of Western countries, but this didn’t fix the deficit. In the end, the USSR fell into bankruptcy in conjunction with other acute social processes in all republics against the backdrop of politics Yeltsin and his comrades drove in - the USSR ordered a long life. The formula is simple if you double-feed Belarus and Russia feed 13 republics whose needs are growing year by year and you collectively feed half of the world at your own expense or receive a tenth of a currency or equivalent cost of exchange, be sure you have money sooner or later will end.
          3. depressant 26 March 2020 09: 29 New
            • 20
            • 4
            +16
            Amendments to the Constitution are needed only in order to finally legitimize by voting the right of a small group of people to the bowels of the territory of Russia and the absence of such a right for all other residents of the country. It is said that there will be no revision of the results of privatization. It was said? It was...
            By voting for the amendments, you thereby vote for the exclusion of the people from the territory of their original residence, for deprivation, for legalized poverty. And if a simple person receives some right under this constitution, then it is to be an expendable material in the economic and political games of usurper gentlemen.
            And you, advocating a positive vote, hope to become lackeys of the ruling gentlemen, differing only in the level of servility. After all, there is the opportunity to eat leftovers in the master's kitchen. What an honor and valor!
            1. military_cat 26 March 2020 09: 48 New
              • 11
              • 4
              +7
              Quote: depressant
              Amendments to the Constitution are needed only in order to finally legitimize by voting the right of a small group of people to the bowels of the territory of Russia and the absence of such a right for all other residents of the country.
              It is surprising that the beginning even reached the NOD androids. Maybe soon they will start to guess that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is not controlled by the IMF at all, and they have simply lied to them all this time?
          4. AK1972 26 March 2020 12: 09 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            But, our president, V.V. Putin, has clearly stated everything for which amendments to the constitution are needed.

            For your information, the word Constitution is written with a capital letter. But in this case, you're right, Freud’s error.
        2. flicker 27 March 2020 01: 05 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          Life experience increased over 20 years. We see what is happening around.
          At the beginning of 90, the miners also gained experience, saw what was happening around and knocked on their helmets, the CPSU (which controlled these knocking) was removed from power. They removed the USSR, but the CPSU remained in a different guise.
          Now they have already become more experienced and are ready to knock on their helmets again. bully
      2. Malyuta 26 March 2020 07: 03 New
        • 38
        • 15
        +23
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt. If they were not, then there is nothing to add.

        And this is not an increase in the brain, but a failed internal policeman pushes people into the opposition.
        1. Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 07: 33 New
          • 15
          • 42
          -27
          Quote: Malyuta
          failed internal police

          Normal domestic policy. If you do not want to live a human life, live a normal life, where in spite of any crises a socially protected state is being built, then I can only state the failure of your brain. Liberals will not help you. They will kill the country. Look west, there is nothing human left. One continuous sodomism.
          1. Uncle lee 26 March 2020 08: 05 New
            • 34
            • 6
            +28
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Liberals will not help you. They will kill the country.

            But what about the statement of Putin VV that he is a liberal!
            1. Stas157 26 March 2020 08: 52 New
              • 24
              • 10
              +14
              Quote: Uncle Lee
              But what about the statement of Putin VV that he is a liberal!

              Chief liberal!

              For Zaputinians, faith in an idol is akin to faith in God. There is nothing rational (it is irrational), and therefore, no arguments work.
          2. tatra 26 March 2020 08: 38 New
            • 29
            • 8
            +21
            Putin himself explained that for him to “live humanly” —for 70% of the Russian people — is to have incomes of $ 200 a month at the level of the poorest African countries. He is proud of this that he created such a System with a handful of the rich and the richest, and the "middle class" with incomes of $ 200, and 20 million beggars.
          3. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 54 New
            • 19
            • 6
            +13
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Normal domestic policy.

            Everyone has their own norm. And judging by the standard of living, in some African countries it is the same. Not ashamed?
          4. Romey 26 March 2020 09: 31 New
            • 17
            • 6
            +11
            Rukalitsa ... The uncle fights with the liberals, simultaneously supporting the liberal economic course of the government with both hands, where the liberal drives the liberal appointed by the president as the liberal. Putinism, however, is a killer coronovirus. Speaking of the Communist Party. But I won’t believe it. Unless from the Duma.
          5. depressant 26 March 2020 09: 33 New
            • 17
            • 5
            +12
            Sergey Olegovich, sodomism is not an argument in the economic and political dispute. There is no sodomism, but the people are dying.
            1. Vadim237 26 March 2020 16: 19 New
              • 1
              • 8
              -7
              250000 for a country with a population of 147 million is not an indicator of extinction - in the 90s more than 150000 per month died every month than they were born and more than one and a half million abortions did.
        2. flicker 27 March 2020 01: 15 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          not an increase in brains, but a failed internal policeman pushes people into opposition.
          And not only domestic politics. But 80 billion (Once again: 80 billion) allocated by the USA so that grant-eaters and grant-suckers only talk about bad domestic politics. And is it not from their sanctions that our domestic policy is bad?
          On the one hand, the sanctions (which hit on our salaries) - on the other hand, 80 billion rubles to help those who will be engaged in the gastronomy.
          And then say that the future belongs to smart people.
      3. Svarog 26 March 2020 07: 14 New
        • 38
        • 15
        +23
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt. If they were not, then there is nothing to add.

        Here is a comment, a good example of today's "patriot", not a word on the topic, but it immediately doused everyone who really sees life .. Do you want to say that the author is wrong? Can specify, with what do not agree?
        1. Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 07: 35 New
          • 20
          • 38
          -18
          Quote: Svarog
          a clear example of today's "patriot"

          Do you think the patriot is you? No, you are mistaken. Patriot is one who helps the homeland. And you and liberals like you, hiding under the guise of a socialist, are trying to split, divide and harm our country.
          1. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 08: 00 New
            • 39
            • 11
            +28
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Sergey Olegovich (Sergey Olegovich)

            Apparently, today the atmospheric pressure is high, if it starts to flatten so much scrapers.
            1. Romey 26 March 2020 10: 37 New
              • 18
              • 6
              +12
              Again, grace descended from the screens yesterday. That's inspired.
          2. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 55 New
            • 16
            • 6
            +10
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Patriot is one who helps the homeland.

            Yes, and help can manifest itself in the form of exposing enemies and traitors.
          3. depressant 26 March 2020 09: 45 New
            • 17
            • 6
            +11
            Sergey Olegovich, and we help the Motherland by criticizing the policy of the ruling elite. In the hope that he will change his mind. You act as if the ruling elite is a capricious child who cannot be told the unpleasant truth. And then he will fall into hysteria, hammer with his legs, wallowing on the floor, and God forbid you personally hurt you with a weighty boot of the Russian Guard and other boots of a checking and guarding brotherhood. Is that how you regard your idol Putin?
          4. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 13 New
            • 17
            • 9
            +8
            Patriot is generally a diagnosis ..
            This is a disease that prevents a person from soberly looking at things and evaluating them without reference to what words indicate his place of birth and what the president’s name sounds like ..
            And here the site is full of examples of someone who, with the word "Putin" purely reflexively begins to wag his tail joyfully .. Just because a patriot .. and therefore must and must ..
        2. flicker 27 March 2020 01: 37 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Can specify, with what do not agree?

          Yes, a lot of things, but you do not read. Well, for example:
          It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution prescribethat international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems.


          For most, not even lawyers, but for those who have at least once tried it is obvious that almost everything in court depends on the INTERPRETATION of what is written in the law, in an article, etc.
          And therefore all sorts of little things should be spelled out.
          Once again: SIGN UP!
          These are the basics of jurisprudence, and the author writes:
          It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution states that international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems

          so can write those who do not understand anything there.
          This is about the legal side of the issue, if we talk about the text from the psychological side, so there is generally horror, it is simply riddled with poison.
      4. Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 41 New
        • 33
        • 12
        +21
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt.

        Do you think that from an inconspicuous director of the Dresden House of Friendship of the USSR - the GDR, under the nurturing of Sobchak in friendship with Chubais, Sechin, Kiriyenko and others, an independent state figure was formed over twenty years of public life? Or, while he was outside the walls of the Kremlin, did he have a complete worldview, an integral picture of the life of Russian society? This citizen spent more time in foreign trips and at events that have nothing to do with public service.
        Putin is not scolded today. To be honest, all this swearing on "an object similar to the Tsar Cannon" (the same size lol ) People began to doubt that it was this "fabulous" ruler who could establish CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER in a country when the constitution itself changes in mood.
      5. Stas157 26 March 2020 08: 37 New
        • 16
        • 9
        +7
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today brains increased?

        It just opened my eyes.
        1. flicker 27 March 2020 02: 34 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          It just opened my eyes.
          What opened up? The United States transferred 80 billion rubles to support Russian NGOs (read: grant-eaters).
          Your eyes "see" what such huge money is spent on?
          And this money is spent on people opening their eyes. It is good when such mediocrities as the author of this article open their eyes - you can understand the catch.
          You can object that you judge what is happening in the country from the experience of your own life and no author can deceive you.
          And this is your main mistake.
          As an example: the answer is needed - the glass is half empty or half full.
          It is here that you are being manipulated: you are convinced that it is empty. And you need to change everything then the glass is inappropriately filled.
          As soon as you begin to change everything thoughtlessly, you will immediately lose not only the contents of the glass, but also the glass itself.
          At the beginning of 90, the miners also wanted to make life even better (they also thought that they could see everything well), as a result, they destroyed the country of the USSR.
          Once again: on the one hand, sanctions, on the other, 80 billion rubles of support. Geldings are not the kind of people who just scatter money.
      6. aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 39 New
        • 15
        • 5
        +10
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt.

        I somehow read that gossip is a way of social protection of society. In my opinion, discussions on the site are the same way of exchanging information and thoughts enriching the brain. People develop concepts, hone their language, and we must admit sometimes they change their point of view. Now people have a problem not with their brains but with time, there is a lot of information, it is presented in such a way that it is difficult to systematize it. I can only say that today almost everything is scolded by Putin! even those for whom he used to be an idol. For he showed on whose side he was. He knows how to look "good" by proposing amendments depriving deputies of real estate over the hill, but he knew! that they will get around this!
        In addition, his game of questions revealed that he does not give the opportunity to conduct a dialogue. This tricky system allows you to answer the question without being interested in whether the answer is satisfactory.
        1. flicker 27 March 2020 02: 39 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          For he showed on whose side he was.

          Do you know that in 2007 the country was one step away from the civil war?
          And thanks to whose efforts and at what costs did you have to go to avoid this war?
          1. aybolyt678 27 March 2020 09: 08 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: flicker
            And thanks to whose efforts and at what costs did you have to go to avoid this war?

            that war was initiated from overseas ... And today, 9 out of 10 Russians are unhappy with the lack of prospects in life. Where is today's effort? where are the costs? where is social justice in demand? Why is there no ban on foreign real estate in power?
      7. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 08 New
        • 17
        • 9
        +8
        Those who had no brains - they still sing Putin's odes ..
        So you are right - there is nothing to add ..
      8. Varyag71 26 March 2020 10: 41 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        for you it has long been clear
    2. Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 22 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      So also for the Crimea.
      I never voted for him, because his texture was clear. And with the Crimea and oil prices, he got a mess.
      But it doesn’t work for a long time if there is nothing more to be presented besides the brackets and the bridge. With whom I do not speak except hatred for him there is no feeling. I already pulled everyone up with my initiatives. I don’t know who draws such ratings for him, but this is bullshit .. He disgusted ordinary people for a long time.
  4. Old partisan 26 March 2020 06: 05 New
    • 11
    • 6
    +5
    Before you go and how to vote, you need to include the rest of the brain.
    Take the constitution of 1993 and the draft 2020 and stupidly not really arguing COMPARE.
    Only then reason.
    You need to think with your head and not ....
    1. Ravil_Asnafovich 26 March 2020 06: 44 New
      • 18
      • 5
      +13
      I agree, one can think in another place, but why such a haste to change the law? Crimea, yes, there really were people demanding a referendum, but what is this? A game of thimbles? Or love chamomile, don’t like? Or is it time for us to try on the master’s whip on his back ??? Or maybe return to the time of Ivan the Terrible and live in house building? eternal diarrhea, and simple law-abiding people suffer.
      1. Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 29 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        They are in a hurry because they know that the world crisis, that the coronavirus, that the deadline, that they privatized the country by a gangster method, that they will have to answer, that the loot and property will have to be returned and that they will be planted ... Therefore, they are preparing in advance. Frightening, on the one hand, the revolution, and on the other, absolutizing its power. After all, the people have long been no longer a bearer of power, he is a slave to these gentlemen!
    2. Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 27 New
      • 24
      • 4
      +20
      Quote: Old Partisan
      Take the constitution of 1993 and the draft 2020 and stupidly not really arguing COMPARE.

      And why compare these “guarantee obligations” in which (1993) all public property was transferred to private ownership and in which rights were guaranteed only to a certain circle of people and (2020), in which such a situation is fixed for life.
      The country does not just do not fulfill these “warranty obligations”, but changes them during the warranty period.
      The "brightest" side of these opuses is the reduction in the population in a natural way and with "guaranteed" methods.
      1. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 39 New
        • 21
        • 4
        +17
        Quote: ROSS 42
        The "brightest" side of these opuses is the reduction in the population in a natural way and with "guaranteed" methods.

        This is precisely how the population decreases in an unnatural way, because the death of a person who does not live to be 60 years old is itself unnatural. And the authorities have created plenty of conditions for high mortality.
    3. aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 40 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      the question is - what is the best way to vote and vote against or not to go at all ???
      1. Gene84 26 March 2020 14: 16 New
        • 10
        • 1
        +9
        be or not be replaced by a vote, we get:
        Vote or not Vote?
        That is the question? What's better?
        Whether to bear from the frantic fate
        Blows of arrows and stones - or boldly
        Arm yourself against a sea of ​​evil
      2. Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 36 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        I think you should not go. Arriving at the polls, we create an informational picture of involvement with the amendments, and they will definitely say that the president’s initiatives have caused unprecedented enthusiasm of the people, etc. etc.
        True, they are insured, the cameras will not work at election commissions, and they also allowed electronic voting, without any testing or other procedures (in any case, I did not hear)
  5. avia12005 26 March 2020 06: 12 New
    • 18
    • 5
    +13
    In the end, it all depends on who and how implements the norms of the Constitution and laws. And with this, more precisely, with responsibility, moreover, criminal responsibility, for their failure to fulfill a great deal of tension. More precisely, this responsibility is almost nonexistent. So it can be written in the Constitution that every Russian citizen is an oligarch. Nothing will change from this until the perpetrators begin to be sent to observe the population of polar bears for non-compliance.
    1. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 59 New
      • 21
      • 6
      +15
      Quote: avia12005
      Nothing will change from this until the perpetrators begin to be sent to observe the population of polar bears for non-compliance.

      And you, a colleague, a humanist, you need to smear everyone’s forehead with greens, and you want to send them to the immaculate land of beauty. This is not humanly, not fastidious.
      1. avia12005 26 March 2020 11: 16 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Let's not repeat the 37th ...
        1. Whirlwind 26 March 2020 14: 16 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Quote: avia12005
          Let's not repeat the 37th ...

          Then let us repeat the 41st ...
          1. avia12005 26 March 2020 15: 49 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            That's for sure. It is easy to imagine how the oligarchy will behave in such a situation.
        2. Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 41 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          I'm afraid no one can do it ...
          The revolution is the result of accumulated errors. And we have a jamb on a jamb and a jamb drives. Having rich historical experience, mankind is stepping on a rake with enviable constancy. Human passions and vices, I think they lead. After all, Putin is not ... but acting ...
  6. codetalker 26 March 2020 06: 28 New
    • 15
    • 31
    -16
    To talk about public administration, you need at least a little understanding of the issue. And the commentators were to blame for the author ... Not a single topic was worked out, not a single amendment. Why are you writing this?
  7. Ravil_Asnafovich 26 March 2020 06: 32 New
    • 14
    • 39
    -25
    Roman, I'm sorry, but you have a fat minus, it is useless to pour from empty to empty.
    1. Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 45 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      What minus then can Putin put in power? They have been pouring over 20 years from empty to empty. And nothing has changed .
  8. horror 26 March 2020 06: 36 New
    • 26
    • 6
    +20
    If you are going to change the Constitution, it means it prevents them from achieving certain goals in this form. Of course, later it will become clear what kind of wholeness, but it will be too late to think or reason.
    1. Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 19 New
      • 30
      • 7
      +23
      Quote: horror
      Of course, later it will become clear what kind of integrity

      They have one goal:
      ensuring eternal government in which there will be no return to the past, no revision of privatization, and when:
      Article 9
      1. Land and other natural resources are used and protected in the Russian Federation as the basis of the life and activities of the peoples living in the relevant territory.
      2. Land and other natural resources may be in privatestate, municipal and other forms of ownership.
      1. aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 43 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        that is, you need to vote against the amendments ??? then there is hope for a second vote with an expanded set of socialist buns ???
        1. Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 47 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Useless. The elections are not transparent, the results do not allow checking and quickly destroy.
  9. mark2 26 March 2020 06: 41 New
    • 17
    • 10
    +7
    C'mon, get your minds off early in the morning. There will be no vote. Putin said yesterday about an indefinite period. And during this time, thought and justification will come to do without a referendum.
    That's all.
    1. Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 36 New
      • 22
      • 6
      +16
      Quote: mark2
      mark2 (Alexander)


      Most likely, against the backdrop of an impending epidemic, they will try to talk about the amended topic, especially since the amendments are actually adopted, and in order to take care of the lives of the population they can go for the introduction of emergency situations, and there
      everything will be after the fact.
      1. aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 49 New
        • 8
        • 4
        +4
        Quote: Stroporez
        Most likely against the backdrop of an impending epidemic

        there will be no epidemic .. real. As a specialist, I’ll tell you that in Italy every dead person is tested for antibodies to coronavirus. And in nature, there is a wild variant of the human coronavirus that every inhabitant of the Earth has been ill with. The test system gives a false positive result of 11%. and this exactly matches the number of dead hi Elderly people die more often due to a decrease in the amount of interferon in their tissues. Interferon is in pharmacies. Reckless press!
      2. Romey 26 March 2020 09: 39 New
        • 9
        • 4
        +5
        Valera, welcome! Duc, Ellochka already transparently hinted at it. It seems to me that our discussions for a boycott are simply about nothing because this senseless and merciless vote is first postponed and then canceled. And, that everything is logical, because old K signed the document. That means a mustache.
    2. siberalt 26 March 2020 07: 37 New
      • 18
      • 5
      +13
      And what is the point of this popular vote, just money down the drain. The constitution is the same - bourgeois, and the owners do not change. But after the vote, it will already be called "Putin's legitimate." And this is neither good nor bad. But a new historical term will appear. Because they did the car tuning, it does not become a different brand.
    3. Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 48 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Well no. Falsification is more profitable than just sending people.
  10. Darter88 26 March 2020 06: 50 New
    • 25
    • 8
    +17
    Auto RU!!! I subscribe to each of your words !!! Only full nationalization and castration around the neck of oligarchs and corrupt government officials will save the Russian Federation and its people from slow extinction !!!
  11. vit670 26 March 2020 06: 59 New
    • 17
    • 7
    +10
    Roman is one hundred percent right! In an authoritarian state, the ruler does EVERYTHING that he wants and spits on all laws and constitutions. Only some spit undercover, while others spit openly. That’s the whole difference, no matter who covers itself!
  12. Thrifty 26 March 2020 07: 05 New
    • 16
    • 6
    +10
    Roman, you can make a wagon of changes to the constitution, but so far it remains only text on paper! It is not even carried out by authorities at all levels, what can we say about the population! And, as regards changes, they are needed. Although, ideally, the country actually needs a completely new constitution, written so that it protects the interests of the population and the Russian state itself.
    1. parusnik 26 March 2020 07: 25 New
      • 16
      • 6
      +10
      ideally, the country actually needs a completely new constitution, written so that it protects the interests of the population and the Russian state itself.
      ... Absolutely. And now there are opportunities for a real nationwide discussion and elaboration of articles and regulations. The Internet ... In our case, according to the Constitution, people like governing the country ... smile
  13. yuliatreb 26 March 2020 07: 12 New
    • 14
    • 8
    +6
    Roman, the question here is different, did it really take twenty years to realize that it is necessary to amend the Constitution of the Russian Federation, why it was not done 15 years ago, and for this period of time, sane citizens do not need to explain why this is all done. And the extreme appearance of GDP on television confirms this, measures are being taken not so much taking care of the country's population, as they are aimed at improving the rating of GDP.
  14. parusnik 26 March 2020 07: 14 New
    • 18
    • 6
    +12
    Horseradish, radish is not sweeter. The EBN and its entourage wrote the first Constitution for themselves. Approved? Approved ... The receiver (which was appointed by the EBN) and its environment are being remade for themselves. What is the difference? On the prevalence of Russian legislation. Explain, for example, how the Code of Merchant Shipping of the Russian Federation will prevail over international treaties and agreements in this area? Or TC, where some provisions are also registered on the basis of international agreements? ... Enthusiasm: everything is liberal to Kapets, as soon as the amendments are adopted. Yeah, but liberal laws, before that liberals also accepted and approved the liberal identity? laughing
  15. Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 14 New
    • 23
    • 8
    +15
    Thank you, Roman!
    Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.

    I would put it a little differently:
    THE FUTURE IS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT SMART PEOPLE!
    That is the whole point of publication, that is how the thoughts of the article are built. You just remarked remarkably that while simpletons choose power, they should be fraudulent. And here, as has been successfully noted, dual citizenship or some other legal quotes are not a hindrance. Because always the “eternally fabulous guarantor” has a “lured manual” State Duma, at hand of dubious quality and significance are the “members” and “circles” of the Federation Council, the opposition and the creative intelligentsia trained and raised on budgetary allocations:

    She will explain everything, she will tell everything with high artistry and expression of facial expressions, BUT !!! she’s not going to live by these rules at all.
    We can do without high-paid jumps, armored trains, steam locomotives, and saviors of the fatherland from crazy maniacs on the stage and screen. And, as practice has shown, we absolutely cannot imagine life without everyday things and everyday goods.
    Therefore, in the future we can simply ignore the hypocrites and hypocrites, giving them their proper place in the booths, and not behind the chairs and stands of the parliament.
    1. parusnik 26 March 2020 07: 18 New
      • 22
      • 4
      +18
      hi Movie from the series: Vote or lose? Part two... laughing
      1. Freeman 26 March 2020 10: 10 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Quote: parusnik
        hi Movie from the series: Vote or lose? Part two... laughing

        Rather, the continuation of the series: Vote with your heart.
        But you don’t need to “turn on your head” - or you’ll suddenly realize that the “advertised” amendments are just “empty words” and “beautiful words”.
        On the main amendments, such as: state council; federal territories; redistribution of powers between branches of government - they do not remove videos.
      2. balunn 26 March 2020 10: 36 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        we hang for a humane attitude to animals, the 2020 Constitution laughing
        Marketers see they write what comes to mind.
        Here's more:
        For decent medicine. Constitution 2020
    2. Was mammoth 26 March 2020 08: 06 New
      • 18
      • 4
      +14
      Quote: ROSS 42
      Thank you, Roman!
      Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.
      I would put it a little differently:
      THE FUTURE IS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT SMART PEOPLE!

      As in a "bearded" joke: "... what is there to think, you need to shake!"
      We must think and go and vote. Even if you "think", then there will be no sense in it, if the head of the Central Election Commission calls only observers other than the authorities "vultures and provocateurs."
      Quote: Sergey Olegovich
      Now this is the situation when the people of our Great Country need to unite and jointly support decisions on the transformation of Russia and its well-being for the sake of us and our descendants.

      The welfare of the country's citizens is growing! Like the number of billionaires, as well as the percentage of the "middle" class! Already scales for 70%! "A little more, a little more" and there will be no poor people in the country of Ur!wink
  16. Lynx33 26 March 2020 07: 34 New
    • 16
    • 6
    +10
    I absolutely agree with the author. Specially, for the seed, so that more people would be tempted to vote, proposed changes that would really be nice to write in the constitution. But! But free cheese only happens in a mousetrap, the only reason why the authorities so want to change the constitution is because it, in the current version, simply prevents them from permanently consolidating the current thieves' power. Therefore, I personally will vote against, no matter how seductive the bait sounds. Which I advise you all.
    1. Vadim237 26 March 2020 13: 48 New
      • 2
      • 9
      -7
      Do not worry, you will not lose anything from these new amendments, just like me.
  17. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  18. rocket757 26 March 2020 07: 44 New
    • 13
    • 5
    +8
    Written and written. In fact, useless campaigns around the bush ... not to convince, not to force, a significant part of the country's population, that only our unity is strong!
    So ask someone, he is against the law forbidding the leaders and their assistants to steal, take their wealth out over the hill, arrange cozy nests there and practically betray the state for which he is entrusted to serve ???
    After all, no one will say now that this is not necessary, they say they are managing so well and for the good of the country !!!
    It seems that it was even proposed to limit / chop off the possibility of such ... AND WHERE IS THIS AMENDMENT \ ARTICLE \ LAW ??? Netuti and NOBODY were particularly indignant, did not intend to do just that with the slogan!
    Well, and for many other amendments ... a lot of noise, the output is zilch!
    There is no unity, there is no united will of the citizens .... and those who, the "servants of the people" take care of themselves, DO NOT Doubt. They are in such matters very even together
    Bound by one chain bound by one goal bound by one chain bound by one.
    Here the joints are sluggish, and the spaces are huge,
    Here the compositions were crumpled to make columns.
    Some words for kitchens, others for streets,
    Here eagles are dropped for broiler chickens.
  19. Boris55 26 March 2020 07: 59 New
    • 8
    • 26
    -18
    Quote: R. Skomorokhov
    Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.

    Constitutional Amendment Law Already Adopted. (March 14, 2020: 13) Changes that do not contradict the current Constitution have already entered into force. The only question is when exactly will they enter into force in full - immediately, after the announcement of positive voting results or in the event of a negative vote, after the change of the Duma, after 1.5 years or 4 years after the presidential.

    Quote from the adopted Law:
    "...If based on the results of the all-Russian vote, amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation will support more than half citizens who will take part in it, the changes provided for by the Law on Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in chapters 3–8 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, will come into force... "means that it will enter into force immediately. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/news/62988

    The federal law was approved by the State Duma and the Federation Council on March 11, 2020, approved as of March 14, 2020 by the legislative (representative) bodies of 85 constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
    1. Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 09 New
      • 12
      • 24
      -12
      You can put at least a thousand minuses in your malice, but the people will vote for amendments and the social orientation of our state will be strengthened. I can argue with anyone that this will be so.

      ps
      The social system cannot be changed by laws and decrees, but it is quite possible to improve the lives of those living today, which Putin is doing. Stumble on lace panties.
      1. AUL
        AUL 26 March 2020 11: 10 New
        • 16
        • 3
        +13
        Quote: Boris55
        You can put at least a thousand minuses in your malice, but people will vote for amendments

        A little correction - not the people, but the CEC! And no one authorized you to sign for the people. As, however, and me.
        1. Vadim237 26 March 2020 13: 50 New
          • 5
          • 9
          -4
          And the people in the mass are motley and have different opinions - so speak on behalf of everyone is not worth it speak for yourself.
  20. Konstantin Shevchenko 26 March 2020 08: 06 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    Well now it’s necessary to list why amendments to the constitution cannot be accepted and which amendments are terrible. Or is it easier why not vote for constitutional amendments? Briefly and clearly.
    The next president will abide by the constitution or the people will become rich on the constitution, this is another topic, you can send psychics to the battle.
    Is the US Constitution the ultimate truth?
    My opinion. Well-being of the USA is provided not by the constitution, but by seasoned capitalism and the US army. But this does not mean that the Russian Federation should copy. Those who copy usually hang in the tail.
  21. Alexander X 26 March 2020 08: 06 New
    • 7
    • 25
    -18
    The new constitution is one of the positive steps for building a state of law. And the author’s agitation against making amendments is wrecking ... To say that everything is bad in Russia, so don’t vote for introducing the necessary articles into the constitution, is the author’s attempt to substitute some concepts for others to harm Russia .. By the way, except for the extension of the term of the presidency , no ideas were put forward by the author.
    1. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 24 New
      • 12
      • 6
      +6
      To say that everything in Russia is bad

      The author just does not say that everything is bad, but parses each item separately and on the shelves ..
      From this and there is nothing to “protest” to object, except for the slogans “Everything is positive, but the author is a pest”
      1. Vadim237 26 March 2020 13: 52 New
        • 5
        • 9
        -4
        Of all the other articles of this author, one conclusion is that everything is bad for the author and he emphasizes this in most of his articles.
        1. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 14: 44 New
          • 8
          • 4
          +4
          the conclusion is that everything is bad for the author and he emphasizes this in most of his articles.

          Maybe we read different articles .. I have never seen the author at least once write about himself somewhere, and how things are going at all ..
          1. Vadim237 26 March 2020 16: 21 New
            • 4
            • 5
            -1
            For the Author - in the country as a whole, everything is bad.
  22. Loess 26 March 2020 08: 12 New
    • 6
    • 19
    -13
    After reviewing a part of the (small) comments from readers in an article about the “amendments” to the Constitution, I decided to continue the topic.

    So, about the alienation of territories. A very important point?

    Yes, I'm about September 5, 2010
    If I am not mistaken, the demarcation of the border is completed. The question is closed. So what does the new amendment have to do with it?
    The reader has piled together international law and international financial institutions.
    And therefore, instead of explaining what this amendment means, there is an appeal to what happened and is happening again BEFORE the adoption of the amendment.
    Without going into details that 97% of the Constitution is dedicated to the fact that a handful of politicians and oligarchs will rule almost forever
    In fact, just for the sake of "details" people read such articles.
    In general, it turned out some kind of one-sided squabble with commentators ... It is precisely on the amendments to the article, by and large, not a word has been said.
    1. Boris55 26 March 2020 08: 25 New
      • 6
      • 18
      -12
      Quote: Less
      If I am not mistaken, the demarcation of the border is completed. The question is closed.

      We have not ratified the Shevardnadze-Baker line, but now we are not ratifying it.

      1. New Year day 26 March 2020 09: 21 New
        • 18
        • 4
        +14
        Quote: Boris55
        We have not ratified the Shevardnadze-Baker line, but now we are not ratifying it.

        America is neither cold nor hot. She enjoys
        1. Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 22 New
          • 4
          • 14
          -10
          Quote: Silvestr
          America is neither cold nor hot. She enjoys

          Nothing lasts forever in this World except Russia.
          By the way, Ukraine still considers Crimea its own.
          1. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 09: 30 New
            • 13
            • 6
            +7
            Quote: Boris55
            Ukraine still considers Crimea its own.

            Ukraine still considers itself Ukraine! bully
            1. Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 39 New
              • 2
              • 17
              -15
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Ukraine still considers itself Ukraine!

              Not everyone there thinks so. Who gets Romanian passports, who is Russian, who is something Polish there.
          2. New Year day 26 March 2020 23: 12 New
            • 8
            • 1
            +7
            Quote: Boris55
            Nothing lasts forever in this World except Russia.

            You are mistaken, the Papuans are eternal!
  23. GRIGORIY76 26 March 2020 08: 18 New
    • 16
    • 9
    +7
    Roman, thanks for the article, subscribe to every word, I myself think the same. By the way, a great slogan "the future is for smart people!".
  24. savage1976 26 March 2020 08: 37 New
    • 6
    • 8
    -2
    How amusing to read the “patriots” a couple of articles back screaming about the need to introduce a progressive taxation scale and today screaming “what for us” when introducing a deposit tax of more than a million rubles.
    1. rocket757 26 March 2020 08: 51 New
      • 11
      • 3
      +8
      Quote: savage1976
      deposit tax over one million rubles.

      tax on interest (profit) that the deposit brings. There is a difference.
      Although specifically THAT I do not care, this is not, so they will take it from another, they will not miss!
      1. Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 03 New
        • 8
        • 20
        -12
        Quote: rocket757
        There is a difference.

        There is. Previously, it was not, but now it will be. The proceeds will go to the benefit of citizens, including yours, your children. Putin strengthens the social component of our state - that’s good. Who is against this is not difficult to guess.

        If we increase, then they will definitely decrease - the law of conservation. laughing
        1. rocket757 26 March 2020 09: 24 New
          • 8
          • 2
          +6
          Quote: Boris55
          conservation law.

          conservation law ... yes not a question!
          If there is trust in those who are called upon to protect and EXECUTE these laws!
          I have confidence in the authorities not ah ..... that's all.
          Let's see in short. For business and "earrings" we will "hang out."
          Now - the measures that the government is taking are logical, justified, NEEDED! questions, especially cries about, should not be, let's look at the results.
          1. Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 26 New
            • 3
            • 16
            -13
            Quote: rocket757
            Now - the measures taken by the government are logical

            Everything is relative. More recently, one member of the government said: "There is no money, but you hold on." Here is such a role of personality in history ...
            1. savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 33 New
              • 4
              • 4
              0
              Well, it’s quite possible that then “no money” now really helps in a difficult situation, when they are really needed, but they might not be there. From the word at all.
              1. rocket757 26 March 2020 09: 48 New
                • 5
                • 3
                +2
                Quote: savage1976
                but they might not have been. From the word at all.

                you can argue about this ... try to convince many that it was necessary and cannot be done differently ... at the beginning of the Forbes list, place the rest that is clearly known and known ... and then try to convince someone.
                1. savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 56 New
                  • 4
                  • 4
                  0
                  Man, this is such a creature that can argue about anything, even that the earth is round.
            2. rocket757 26 March 2020 09: 43 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Quote: Boris55
              "No money, but you hold on." Here is such a role of personality in history ...

              of course it tried to be noted, but somehow ... hardly anyone will remember a good one.
      2. savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 20 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        It was too lazy to write for a long time.
    2. Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 09: 00 New
      • 15
      • 7
      +8
      Quote: savage1976
      with the introduction of a tax on deposits of more than a million rubles.

      Oh, tell me the logic of this tax? Explain its progressiveness? Those people who managed to save several million for old age (in our country there are highly paid specialists) are required to pay tax for what? For the fact that the bank instead of the prescribed 10% pays 4%? Yes, these millions are kept by those who do not have foreign accounts ... Then, let's tax the bank spread from currency speculation ... Actually, no one was particularly upset, because for a long time he knew that there was nothing good from Putin or his government You will not get it. Let him make fun in the end ...
      1. savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 12 New
        • 3
        • 9
        -6
        Well then, just as well, explain the difference why a person created a business that brings him millions and creates jobs, should pay more percent of his income than workers who work in the jobs created by him.?
        1. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 29 New
          • 8
          • 6
          +2
          Because he has more income than workers ..
          And just the workers do the bulk of the work ..
          And a person, even if he created this business, is making his income through other people's labor ..
          Why are “jobs” offered for a beggarly salary .. compared with the same income that this business brings ..
          1. savage1976 26 March 2020 10: 47 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Then what are the claims for tax on income on a deposit of more than a million, people also make income on it, and the owner of a deposit carries a sofa on his back. And you are not familiar with the discussion. I have no questions about income taxes, they are from the "patriots" who were progressive yesterday, and today they read "for us then."
            1. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 11: 01 New
              • 4
              • 4
              0
              I didn’t write anything about the claims, but I didn’t answer certain questions regarding the distribution of income between people ..
              Given that most of our workers cannot afford to have a free million close to me ... I would go even further, and would bring in an even higher percentage of more than 5 million .. For, all the same, such millions were earned not by sweat and blood, as a rule ..
            2. Stirbjorn 26 March 2020 11: 51 New
              • 9
              • 4
              +5
              Quote: savage1976
              Then what are the claims for tax on income on a deposit of more than a million, people also make income on it, and the owner of a deposit carries a sofa on his back.

              because a million, right now it's just about nothing. If a person wants to save up for a car-apartment, and not take an imposed loan, then it must be ripped off ?! A pensioner who works, and postpones his retirement for a funeral, and for a rainy day, for the same medicines, is now becoming the object of hunting for tax officials ?! It would make sense if they invested at least 5 million. As well as with a progressive tax - it must be introduced for incomes from 100 thousand minimum
              1. savage1976 26 March 2020 12: 35 New
                • 2
                • 4
                -2
                And that means a pensioner who sold an apartment for 5 million can already be peeled off like sticky and it doesn’t matter what he needs for medicine. . Or a person who saves on a car for 5 million 10 years. As I already wrote, every progressive fighter wants to start at a level that exceeds his income, and if he is subject to tax, then this is of course the bloody regime that he personally robs.
                1. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 13: 27 New
                  • 9
                  • 4
                  +5
                  a pensioner who sold an apartment for 5 million can already be peeled off like sticky and it doesn’t matter what he needs for medicine.

                  5 million for drugs ?? Lying in a bank on deposit ??
                  Get involved ..))

                  Or a person who saves on a car for 5 million 10 years.
                  Show me one .. at least one ..
                  You won’t even save up on Kia Rio if you save 10 years .. For 5 years ago it cost TWO times cheaper than today ..
                  Well, those who buy cars for 5 million .. believe me - they certainly do not save up on them .. even more so, for 10 years ..
                  Well, if you want to give examples, then at least come up with real ones ..
                  But in reality there will not be many of them .. for, I repeat, hard workers do not have millions on their accounts now .. Otherwise, the country would not have been completely in mortgages and loans !!
                  1. savage1976 26 March 2020 14: 29 New
                    • 2
                    • 4
                    -2
                    As you read Vaud, everyone works purely for a mole, and the last cucumber is eaten up without salt, but as a tax on income from deposits per million, the poor and the unfortunate are robbed. Well, pensioners live with us, save millions with their pensions for funerals, and on Poor there are meager pensions. You would have already decided, pensioners and salaries are small or a million penny. Those with 1 million will divide it into 2 accounts in different banks and will not steam. In reality, those who do not have enough banks to keep a million will fall under the tax. But the fighters for the progressive tax lit up well.
                    1. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 14: 48 New
                      • 5
                      • 2
                      +3
                      As you read Vaud, everyone works purely for the mole, and the last cucumber is eaten up without salt, and as a tax on income from deposits per million, the poor and the unfortunate are robbed.
                      This again is some kind of "collected works about all and about nothing" ..
                      At the same time, you did not answer any of my SPECIFIC questions ..

                      You would have already decided, pensioners and salaries are small or a million penny.
                      I’m quite certain - the first option ..
                      What I have already written about ..
                      1. savage1976 26 March 2020 15: 00 New
                        • 1
                        • 3
                        -2
                        So if pensioners and hard workers do not have millions in the account, why cry that they are robbed? It is a reasonable step aimed at raising taxes from wealthy people and not affecting the poor. In fact, there is no difference in whether a person bought an apartment and renting it pays taxes or put money in a bank, receives income and pays taxes from him.
                      2. savage1976 26 March 2020 15: 07 New
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        0
                        And about 5 million rubles of medicine, so use Google and find out that there are medicines and much more expensive. And the pensioner can wish for himself a coffin for 5 million, his right and for 50 can. Let us consider them poor. And you can save up to 5 and 10 years on many things, not only on Kia Rio. And those who save up for Kia Rio do not get tax. So this is your inferior examples and questions.
                      3. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 15: 40 New
                        • 5
                        • 1
                        +4
                        And about 5 million rubles of medicine, so use Google and find out that there are medicines and much more expensive.

                        Of course .. it is those pensioners that we are talking about here, and they buy from them 14 medicines for 5 million each ..))
                        I say - take off ..
                        If Pugacheva buys such medicines for 5 lyam, then she doesn’t have to equal her pensioners .. And she doesn’t sell an apartment for this, as you wrote yourself ..
                        And if he sells, then he does not put it in the bank for interest ..
                        Well, if you want to give examples, then at least come up with real ones ..

                        And the pensioner can wish for himself a coffin for 5 million, his right and for 50 can. Let us consider them poor.
                        Everything is mixed up .. people, horses ..))
                        Are you talking to yourself? Why this post ??)

                        And you can save up to 5 and 10 years on many things, not only on Kia Rio.
                        You can ... just don’t accumulate anyway ..)) Why - I already wrote above .. For 5 years, Rio has grown in price by 2 times .. Now it’s still growing ..

                        And those who save up for Kia Rio do not get tax.

                        Well, you finally understood what I wrote 5 times - we don’t have people with millions in bank accounts .. The country is poor, people are all in debt and credit ..
                        And you tell me all the tales about some pensioners who have 5 million each in a deposit for medicines ..))
                      4. savage1976 26 March 2020 15: 42 New
                        • 2
                        • 3
                        -1
                        So then why cry, why the poor are robbed?
  25. savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 26 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    The spread according to the Tax Code is taxed and the citizen is obliged to file a tax return and pay the tax. But alas, in our country the severity of laws is not necessarily compensated by the network of their implementation. But op is already fun.
  26. _Sergei_ 26 March 2020 10: 15 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    A person who has accumulated several million and receives a percentage of more than a million from his accumulations, did he accumulate a hard worker for old age? The tax will be taken from interest if they exceed a million.
    1. AUL
      AUL 26 March 2020 11: 24 New
      • 8
      • 4
      +4
      Quote: _Sergey_
      accumulated several million and receives a percentage of more than a million from his savings, is it for old age accumulated a hard worker?

      Sergey, would you not be dishonored ... First read about it, and only then speak. If that - I have on my card only the remnants of the pension from the bounty of the FIU.
    2. Lekz 31 March 2020 16: 39 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Temper righteous anger. The tax will not be taken from pensioners and interest amounts not exceeding 60 thousand.
  27. Vadim237 26 March 2020 16: 33 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    Quickly you change your shoes - just recently for a progressive tax, and now for everyone who holds more than a million in banks on deposits you keep a fence - this is bad, theft, deceit, and yes you probably forgot or are not aware that wealthy people can keep such accounts even To Russia and abroad - at the same time, pensioners, self-employed engineers and everyone else can earn millions of rubles over time, simply playing on the world stock exchange through a mobile phone. And deposits are far from all the services that customers of banks use.
  28. Tatyana Pershina 26 March 2020 17: 03 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Listen and read carefully. The tax is not on deposit, but on the percentage on the deposit paid by the bank. That is, you will receive not 4% per annum of your deposit, but 3,48%. Your main contribution will not be affected.
  • Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 09: 01 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    Quote: savage1976
    and today screaming "and we are for that" with the introduction of a deposit tax of more than a million rubles.

    Have you heard about double taxation? wink I have a minus on the map, I do not care. But true is more expensive.
    1. savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 16 New
      • 4
      • 6
      -2
      Well, well, that is, double taxation of someone is possible, but you can’t? And there is no double taxation, income is taken not from the entire amount, but from the amount of income on the deposit. A person bought a car for a million and taxes, receives income, give 13%, people put money on deposit, receive income, pay 13%. What is the difference? For each of these millions, tax has already been paid. But in the case of a taxi driver, the tax is normal, and in the case of a deposit, double taxation? And yes, they will take a tax from me.))) =
      1. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 09: 21 New
        • 12
        • 2
        +10
        Quote: savage1976
        but from the amount of income on the deposit.

        I know. But the bulk of the commentators see wrongly understood, hence the negative reviews. In real life, this law should have been adopted a long time ago, but globally 13% of bank interest is a penny (taking a calculator you will understand), and now the introduction of this law is more like a PR move.
        The much more needed progressive tax law. hi
        1. savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 24 New
          • 6
          • 6
          0
          So here from the "patriots" for these pennies the OP has already risen, but what will happen when the real progression is returned? Well, yes, the "patriots" want it to be from others, but you can’t touch them, they are the "patriots". Damn, I can’t laugh. How do they survive it.
          1. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 09: 33 New
            • 7
            • 3
            +4
            Quote: savage1976
            But what will happen when the real progression is returned?

            Everything will be fine. About op - as I already told you, many simply did not understand the essence. Some media have warmed up, and the media of various kinds, and not just the opposition.
            1. savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 36 New
              • 5
              • 2
              +3
              Well, time will tell, it will be introduced when the time comes and the conditions for this will turn out. And my opinion is, Ohr will stand for a long time and everything is in the style of "and we are for that."
              1. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 10: 02 New
                • 6
                • 3
                +3
                I bet that the bulk will be in favor. Only now they will not introduce it.
                1. savage1976 26 March 2020 10: 06 New
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  +3
                  It’s possible to argue, everything will depend on the amounts, if the income tax is increased from 100 thousand a month, then there will be one thing, and if from a million it will be different. We already had progression in modern Russia (after the collapse of the union), it didn’t improve life very well. Because if you paid the tax as it should be l..hom. In my opinion, it would be more correct now not to raise the tax on the rich, but to abolish it from the poor, for example, who receives less than 2 moles is exempt from personal income tax.
                  1. Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 10: 08 New
                    • 9
                    • 3
                    +6
                    I agree. But if with a hundred pieces there will be 14%, and with a million 20%, then no one will be against. I would do with 10 lyam 30%
                    Naturally per month
                    1. Vadim237 26 March 2020 16: 40 New
                      • 2
                      • 2
                      0
                      If you introduce a progressive tax, then for companies with annual net profit of more than a billion rubles - 30 percent of the amount, several thousand such companies in Russia will be much easier to work with them than with each person individually.
  • SeregaBoss 26 March 2020 08: 52 New
    • 11
    • 10
    +1
    The author, well, you discussed amendments to the law, about the ruble, citizenship, approx.
    Then you write that the oligarchs and so on write it for themselves. Where? Show me the amendment number that bothers you so much? Let's think together with our brains. Did you find a place?
    To slobber about gasoline, the ruble and citizenship have already got. Everything lives badly, they have lived up to the fact that cars in the yard do not fit.
    Yes, in the country of problems above the roof, but now the war would not have started because of oil, and those who see the power are thinking.
    1. Golovan Jack 26 March 2020 12: 03 New
      • 8
      • 13
      -5
      Quote: Serge Boss
      Show me the amendment number that bothers you so much? Let's think together with our brains. Did you find a place?

      No, this style is this: the author only indicates the direction of thought that is desirable for him. Every reader thinks out the rest himself.

      Reception as ancient as the world is called "manipulation of consciousness." ABC yes

      Details and evidence-based reasoning by this trick ... not foreseen request
      1. SeregaBoss 26 March 2020 12: 59 New
        • 6
        • 7
        -1
        That's for sure. And I look at the discussion threads are developed by the same 5-6 people, do you have time to work? The liberals have only one opinion, this is their opinion and it is correct. They don’t see anything further than their nose.
        It seems like the Military Review website and the military are not few, do the military remember their sucking existence 10-15 years ago? No, forgot already. Power is not that, it's not that.
  • aglet 26 March 2020 08: 55 New
    • 9
    • 8
    +1
    Roman, I will subscribe to any word in your article, but in vain you are. half of the local readers will not read the article to the end- "too many bukof", as they say, half of the second half will be strongly opposed, they are for Putin, the second half will be opposed, they are against Roman. but everyone will go together to vote in favor, they are patriots, and you are rocking the boat.
    "you can force a horse to water, but you can’t get it drunk," the proverb says, until all the readers here understand the prospects for the development of the country themselves, you can’t convince them of anything. but when they understand everything, it will be too late, there will be a bunch of little pages preoccupied with just getting food. The Bzheeyinsky plan still works successfully, it's not
    1. flicker 26 March 2020 21: 58 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      "you can force a horse to water, but you can’t get it drunk," says a proverb,

      Hmm, but Roman, it seems, prefers the saying of another people: "there are never many shekels."
      And he sees the future behind them bully
  • aglet 26 March 2020 09: 01 New
    • 8
    • 7
    +1
    Quote: Sergey Olegovich
    we must unite around the leader of our country. Whenever a threat arose, our people united

    this leader shamelessly takes advantage of this so that the people, united, once again, save themselves, and at the same time
  • 1536 26 March 2020 09: 17 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    The most regrettable is that the opinion of “smart people” is the ultimate truth. The only question is who defines "smart" you or, excuse me, "eccentric" with the letter "m" and do not know how to live. To fall into the category of "smart" and that's it, life was a success. But what does the Constitution have to do with its amendments?
  • New Year day 26 March 2020 09: 20 New
    • 20
    • 8
    +12
    The bulk who live in constant struggle with the terrible disease "The first channel of the brain"

    Everything is correctly written by the author. Himself defeated this ailment, ashamed as much as Solovyov listened! YES and the rest are no better. Until you turn your brains on and start to think, you will be a slave to power. What does she seek

    Think. For smart people possibly, future.

    It remains to get the key quality of the person "Mind" so that it does not work "maybe"
    1. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 34 New
      • 11
      • 7
      +4
      Himself defeated this ailment, ashamed as much as Solovyov listened!

      By the way, yes .. about 5 years ago, too, was a sinner ..
      What is surprising - because I liked the fact that he sings ..))
      Only then, somehow, a little one-sidedness began to notice the one-sidedness of all these programs ..
    2. SeregaBoss 26 March 2020 13: 02 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Judging by your profile picture, you switched from channel 1 to TNT, and how to get smarter there.
      1. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 13: 28 New
        • 6
        • 4
        +2
        According to TNT, more reality can be seen than from Solovyov ..))
  • Gardamir 26 March 2020 09: 35 New
    • 15
    • 9
    +6
    I totally agree.
    And sometimes you really don’t want to argue and prove something. We live here and now. Those who did not have time to stock up on groceries are slowly getting more expensive. The neighbor was reduced. And we’ll see a lot of “fun” things in the coming month. But they will tell how wonderful everything is. Yesterday, the patriots rejoiced that the president promised to take tax from a million percent. And I am more concerned that all ATMs in the near future may cease to issue cash.
    1. New Year day 26 March 2020 11: 06 New
      • 13
      • 4
      +9
      Quote: Gardamir
      all ATMs in the near future may cease to issue cash

      There is such a Valery Solovey, so he spoke about the need to have cash and currency on hand 2 weeks ago. While all his predictions come true
      1. Altona 26 March 2020 15: 27 New
        • 10
        • 1
        +9
        Quote: Silvestr
        There is such a Valery Solovey, so he spoke about the need to have cash and currency on hand 2 weeks ago. While all his predictions come true


        My advice in January. Of course the "wrong."
        1. New Year day 26 March 2020 20: 23 New
          • 8
          • 2
          +6
          Quote: Altona
          My advice in January. Of course the "wrong."

          correct. If there is something to change. Of course
          1. Altona 26 March 2020 20: 27 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: Silvestr
            correct. If there is something to change

            -------------------------
            Sylvester, these are all very risky and non-obvious things, I mean financial “gestures” with personal finances, if you are not a professional, but act on a whim. Again, what amounts to risk and how to lay them out.
    2. Golovan Jack 26 March 2020 11: 56 New
      • 7
      • 11
      -4
      Quote: Gardamir
      all ATMs in the near future may cease to issue cash

      1. For whatever reason?
      2. What are you not comfortable with cashless? Or them too give out, pah ... stop taking?
      1. Gardamir 26 March 2020 12: 11 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        First notice maybe.
        It turns out that this recommendation applies to those ATMs that accept and issue. There the virus does not have time to jump off the banknote.
        Well, sometimes you have to pay only cash.
        1. Golovan Jack 26 March 2020 12: 23 New
          • 6
          • 11
          -5
          Quote: Gardamir
          this recommendation applies to those ATMs that accept and issue. There the virus does not have time to jump off the banknote

          It is a rational explanation. Paying cash on buses, for example, we canceled another week ago, and for the same reason.

          Quote: Gardamir
          First notice maybe

          I know this style. In which case - "but I did not say anything."

          You are incorrigible, man laughing
  • Uncle Vanya Susanin 26 March 2020 09: 50 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    "To summarize, I can say the following. The coolest country in terms of democracy, the United States ..."
    I hope it was sarcasm!
  • Roman12345678 26 March 2020 09: 57 New
    • 11
    • 11
    0
    Another great article ..
    1. _Sergei_ 26 March 2020 10: 17 New
      • 5
      • 8
      -3
      Is that sarcasm too?
    2. _Sergei_ 26 March 2020 10: 21 New
      • 5
      • 10
      -5
      In Russia, we have such a saying "an unwise person sees the same from afar"
      1. Roman12345678 26 March 2020 11: 06 New
        • 7
        • 9
        -2
        I doubt that people like you could give birth to the Russian land ..))
        Most likely, some kind of computer program .. but, since part of the money, as is customary in our country, was successfully cut, we had to save on good programmers .. Hence, such inept attempts to look “smart” ..
  • AleBors 26 March 2020 10: 04 New
    • 8
    • 6
    +2
    Thanks, Roman. Well written. I have already decided, for a long time I do not go to any vote.
  • aleks.29ru 26 March 2020 10: 54 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    I will not vote anymore with the simple wording “lost confidence”.
    1. New Year day 26 March 2020 11: 08 New
      • 13
      • 4
      +9
      Quote: aleks.29ru
      I won’t vote anymore

      I think that there will be no vote at all. There is no sense - the law has already been adopted
  • seacap 26 March 2020 11: 02 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    Basically, I completely agree with the author, All this, a kind of screen for plebs, a kind of imitation of an active pseudo-democratic process, get and shut up, and what’s going to happen in reality behind this screen is unlikely to be known to us soon. By the way, all this "movement", I apologize for the slang, but it is only suitable for determining the activities of honored adventurers of the upper class. So, all these “body movements” with the virus, so it looks like a cover operation, the scale and scope are too excessive for an unremarkable seasonal disease. All measures of isolation under the guise of infection very much resemble at least a rehearsal of blocking protests, revolutionary sentiments, blocking mass protests, hence the inadequate prison terms, receive less for murders. I am an ordinary lay man, not paranoid, just education is normal, Soviet, allowing you to think logically, of course this is solely my opinion.
  • Avior 26 March 2020 11: 10 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    So, in the United States, in the event of a conflict between the rule of international law and domestic law (and especially a precedent), the judge will always be guided by the latter.

    not quite right.
    What a precedent is, it is, it is an obstacle to the principle of "Law that draws." If in one case such a decision was made, it is fair in all other similar cases to judge similarly, while the law is unchanged.
    If the law has changed, another thing.
    But the fact that the United States is more important than internal laws, this is not entirely true.
    According to the US Constitution, they are completely equivalent.
    This constitution and the laws of the United States, which will be established to enforce it, as well as all treaties concluded by the United States, must be the supreme law of the country, and judges of each state must obey them, at least in the constitution and laws of individual states there are contradictions to them.

    Article VI of the US Constitution
    https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%A1%D0%A8%D0%90
  • NordUral 26 March 2020 11: 20 New
    • 9
    • 5
    +4
    I support the article! But the question remains, burning to impossibility.


    I ask all concerned to vote!
  • KSVK 26 March 2020 11: 25 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Quote: Freeman

    - “Beat sharpies with candelabra,” until I urge.

    Or maybe it's time?
  • KSVK 26 March 2020 11: 47 New
    • 9
    • 4
    +5
    Quote: Sergey Olegovich
    Patriot is one who helps the homeland.

    I apologize, but what is the "Homeland" in your opinion? I've been everywhere, well, around myself, of course, I observe that people are getting poorer and poorer. These people are "Homeland"? I see on television every day they collect money for operations for sick children. They are not "homeland"? I see how the forests are cut down and exported abroad. Do they not belong to the "Homeland" these forests? Rivers are becoming poorer and more polluted. In places of extraction of "black gold" in general have seen what is happening with the environment? Take a look, take a look. See a lot of interesting things. This does not apply to your "Homeland"? Or is the "Homeland" the Rotenberg-Deripasco-Millers? Well, then help. Like a true patriot. It seems only to me that it is to this "Motherland" that your help .... well, it is not required.
  • WayKheThuo 26 March 2020 13: 15 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    The author is right. I especially liked the comparison of the number of articles in the Constitutions.
    And further. I believe that the patriots mentioned in the article should be written as "patriots."
  • cniza 26 March 2020 13: 48 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.


    Too smart do not want to power, and the law is not written for fools, and so it turns out a vicious circle ...
  • Brigadier 26 March 2020 14: 39 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    Behind all that verbal tinsel "for the people", which are filled with "amendments", there is absolutely clearly traced only one, the most important idea, for the sake of which all this was conceived ...

    I suppose you all understand exactly which one. laughing wink lol

  • Victor N 26 March 2020 14: 40 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Typical position: "I do not see a problem - that means it is not there."
    Meanwhile, the mission of the researcher is to be the first to see the problem, to warn society, to outline solutions. This takes many years. And not the fact that you will gain awareness.
    But it’s worthwhile to always check yourself: maybe I don’t understand what? It happens. Very much....
  • Ravil_Asnafovich 26 March 2020 14: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    220 comments, 20 minuses to me, that is, less than 10 percent, democracy.
  • Altona 26 March 2020 15: 15 New
    • 15
    • 5
    +10
    Let's decide for a start - does the Constitution work for us in general?
    The right to assemble peacefully and without weapons? Already does not work in any form.
    Article 51 "No one is obligated to testify against himself and his relatives." Does not work.
    "In the Russian Federation laws should not be adopted detracting from the rights and freedoms of man and citizen," does it work? Pension reform clearly answered. Well, and so you can go through other articles. Plain declarative paper regarding the rights and freedoms of a citizen. But in the foundations of state power there is an ever-increasing desire for closed power from society and a desire for tyranny. So what did you want the "king"? Arrived. He has long been available. With their guardsmen dash guardsmen and Black Hundreds dash schizoputins, with new nobles, with estate society. Something like this. To the Schizoputins, a huge and fiery "hello."
  • faterdom 26 March 2020 15: 21 New
    • 12
    • 3
    +9
    Novel, the question requires further development and continuation.
    Let's not worry - there-those-who-need to read everything and report to someone-need. Will it be vox populi.
    At the same time, let them better instruct their Young Army men or “ours”. And it’s a shame to see how proponents of the “package of amendments” like parrots hammer the same thing: “So you are for distributing territories! So you are liberal! So you are against indexation of pensions!”
    Is it me - a war veteran who has served 36 calendars for the distribution of territories? My head doesn’t work like that, I can only protect, hold or liberate territories, they simply didn’t teach me otherwise. For this, there is defense and offensive with their varieties in tactics, distribution is for politicians, I just don’t know how.
    The liberals (those whom we all have in mind) are Medvedev, Chubais, Kudrin, Gref, Nabiulina, Miller, Siluanov, and, in his own words, Putin. Why should I call these epithets and even strangers - I do not understand ...
    About pensions - for the millionth time: that bad dancers have been preventing them from indexing for so many years, on the contrary - all recent years have been frozen, scored, or one-time handouts instead of indexing, and the apotheosis is that depriving millions of pensions is purely in honor of the football championship. Is it really just a "bad Constitution"? (You eat something - but not get fatter? And I have such a constitution!)
    So, let’s at least just let us know: we simply can’t be fooled “weakly”, we are scientists, we have seen “Perestroika”, the presidents have already laid down on our tracks, we already know “while I am the President ...”.
    It’s time to think more intelligently about the people - evolutionary selection has already weeded out the stupid ones, they have not survived, they are sick.
    1. Gost2012 27 March 2020 12: 45 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: faterdom
      .... stupid evolutionary selection has already weed out ...


      oh not all, oh how not all ...
  • KSVK 26 March 2020 16: 02 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: cniza
    Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.


    Too smart do not want to power, and the law is not written for fools, and so it turns out a vicious circle ...

    For some reason I remembered:
    Who can do.
    Who can’t teach.
    Who can’t learn, manage.
  • KSVK 26 March 2020 16: 11 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Quote: faterdom

    About pensions - for the millionth time: that bad dancers have been preventing them from indexing for so many years, on the contrary - all recent years have been frozen, scored, or one-time handouts instead of indexing, and the apotheosis is that depriving millions of pensions is purely in honor of the football championship.


    And everyone has already forgotten about the accumulated stolen part. Sorry. As well as about 2% of excess VAT lost amid increasing retirement age.

    Quote: faterdom

    So, let’s at least just let us know: we simply can’t be fooled “weakly”, we are scientists, we have seen “Perestroika”, the presidents have already laid down on our rails, we are already familiar with “while I am the President ...”
    It’s time to think more intelligently about the people - evolutionary selection has already weeded out the stupid ones, they have not survived, they are sick.


    Specific suggestions?

    PS And in the meantime, the guardsmen are being pulled into the capital. Undoubtedly for the protection of the population. That's just interesting from whom?

    ZZA I'll figure out how to insert a video ....
    1. Victor N 27 March 2020 09: 00 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      The PENSION FUND does not have money, and it is not part of the State budget - is it difficult to understand?
      1. aybolyt678 28 March 2020 17: 58 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        it’s hard for me to understand where my money is going that I have been paying more than 25 in PF
        1. Victor N 29 March 2020 12: 50 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          If you can’t "understand", you just need to study the question - it will be very useful in life. And it’s better to do this 10 years before the retirement age.
  • A.TOR 26 March 2020 16: 51 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Interesting ... people are gradually beginning to see clearly. I need to bribe popcorn
  • KSVK 26 March 2020 17: 09 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    I figured it out.




    What do you think, rehearsal?

    1. depressant 26 March 2020 22: 28 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      About the buses with the military.
      In fact, the situation is much more complicated than many imagine. The country has 10 million migrants from Central Asia. These are young passionate men. I would not be surprised if at least 1 million of them work in Moscow and the region. All earned money, except for those that go to their own food and payment of rental housing, they send to their homeland. They have no cash reserves. And here is quarantine, many enterprises ceased operations, including construction stopped (she saw it when she was driving from the hospital), but the border is closed, migrants cannot return home, to their homeland. Given their impending lack of money, the leaders of the diasporas, preoccupied with the loss of their own power over compatriots, have already begun blackmailing our law enforcement agencies and authorities with statements about the possible criminalization of the diasporas. In particular, the leader of the Uzbek diaspora spoke about this even before March 21. Like, they will rob and kill the locals. Migrants already require financial assistance from our authorities. After all, their work is used by a huge industry. They believe in their own right. Hence the delivery of troops to Moscow by buses. I think, not only to Moscow.
      By the way, the police were on duty in my village today. All day. I had the opportunity to watch two cars from the window of my kitchen. In general, we reap what we sow. And this is only one aspect. The question is, what else do we not see?
    2. Victor N 29 March 2020 12: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It’s time to kick asses in Russia!