Military Review

About the new Constitution of the Russian Federation: comments

388

After reviewing a part of the (small) comments from readers in an article about the “amendments” to the Constitution, I decided to continue the topic.


And the first thing that inspired me to do this was a demonstration of a complete misunderstanding of the issue by readers.

The main mass that lives in a constant struggle with the terrible disease “The First Channel of the Brain” and which comes to “VO” exclusively to express its Personal Opinion and show how damaged the author is is dedicated.

Instead of an epigraph:

"The author is a liberal of pure water .. in fact a traitor to the MOTHERLAND! who ever ran this article here? question to administrators .. WHO allowed a traitor to write an article here? the author is a lying parasite .... that climbs out who really writes articles here .... An article is custom-made pure water .. Constitutional changes it is IMPORTANT to vote for it MANDATORY! and to the author of the article there is a desire to solder the TIME for INFRASCIA and alarmism! ! "

Spelling and punctuation of the original are fully preserved.

The portrait of a true patriot is evident. It reminds me very much of one European country. There were such vogue performances from the rostrum and on the radio. How it ended, everyone remembers?

For almost 10 years of work at VO, I have long concluded for myself that there are a lot of smart people. That's just to speak, they are no longer torn in the front ranks, but this is understandable. Messi will not go to play Erchim for any money, even considering that this club is a 9-time champion. Mongolia, true, but still ... I think the analogy here is clear.

Therefore, it does not pull to argue and spend arguments.

But there is another. Here it is:

“Not a word about the ban on the alienation of the territories of Russia, the author is against this amendment, why are you silent. Not a word about the ban on foreign citizens being officials (ban on second citizenship). Not a word about an attempt to change the relationship between international norms and rules and Russian laws, if international is harmful to us, we are guided by our laws. So far, we are guided by the instructions of the IMF, RRB, etc. ”

Okay, there was an attempt made. Because - let's go.

So, about the alienation of territories. A very important point? No, it is clear that after introducing this paragraph into the Constitution, if Vanya Vetkin says / writes in Odnoklassniki that “they failed, the Kuril Islands”, Vanya will have to be imprisoned. As I understand it, this is exactly what the “patriots” want.

Excuse me, can Vanya give the Kuril Islands? Not. Is it stupid? Stupid.

And who can? No, is that real?

And let’s Khrushchev in the next world alone leave. He transferred this Crimea from one republic of the USSR to another. Another question that Yeltsin did not want to take ...

Or another moment. Rejection, transmission is bad. And when is it under the brand name of “demarcation” - how is it? Yes, I’m talking about September 5, 2010, when with a stroke of the pen, Medvedev and Putin suddenly gave the Norwegians 80 square kilometers of the shelf. Together with fishing grounds and oil reserves.

And do not say that Putin has "nothing to do with it, it’s Medvedev who is all a scoundrel." Medvedev, he poor fellow, only on Twitter could write something without the permission of his prime minister.

And the islands on the Amur? Ah, demarcation too ...

Here, in fact, is the answer to the question: how to give territory correctly, if you really want to. Already itchy when. Demarcation. At the request of the “one”, the parties specified, measured and so on.

So ... All these screams somehow don't look very good. To ban the tearing away of the territory suddenly decided by those who gave them quite normally. Yes, at first they gave it away, then it was banned. In addition to demarcation. The loophole remained, otherwise in general “bees against honey” turned out.

Second part. International law and the rejection of its prevalence over national.

I don’t know why everyone was so excited about this business. I don’t “understand”, but I don’t know how to eat it. Because from a legal point of view, you can make different calculations, but without international legal organizations you can’t get far.

I repeat and quote my reader again:

“Not a word about an attempt to change the relationship between international norms and rules and Russian laws, if international is harmful to us, we are guided by our laws. So far, we are guided by the instructions of the IMF, RRB, etc. ”

The reader has piled together international law and international financial institutions.

Meanwhile, existing international norms are not ignored, but do not govern the domestic legal systems in most countries of the world.

So, in the United States in the event of a conflict between the rule of international law and domestic law (and in particular a precedent), the judge will always be guided by the latter. In the UK, a judge has no competence to apply international law if it does not comply with national law. If in France an international obligation contains a provision contrary to the constitution, then permission to ratify or approve it can be given only after a constitutional review.

Who is against this? Yes, no one. I do not mind, although some readers attribute it to me.

Another question: when does it work?

Perhaps it is worth recalling what the Constitution is. She, the Constitution, is defined as The basic Law, and all other normative acts, laws, rules that apply in the territory of the Russian Federation, must not contradict it.

You see, if, say, an international treaty contradicts the Constitution of the Russian Federation, then the Constitution is in force. And no one in the world will say anything, everyone has the same thing.

Yes, of course, the supremacy of the Constitution is wonderful. The whole secret here is that the Constitution, as our American partners say, is not a self-fulfilling law. Her, darling, it is necessary to execute. But it’s more difficult to get to the Constitutional Court here than to reach Berlin in 1941.

And in general, many were faced with the fact that on the basis of foreign laws they were inconvenient? Did many feel Uncle Sam's heavy hand on his neck? International law and international laws strangling our weak Constitution?

I understand that there is a definition of international law. But, alas, there is neither an international criminal code in it, nor any other. International law is a set of agreements and national laws of all countries.

There is, of course, the International Criminal Court in The Hague. But he operates with concepts that are in the legislation of any normal country: genocide, war crimes and so on.

UN International Court of Justice. Also an interesting organization.

When considering a case and making decisions, the Court applies the sources of law, which are defined in article 38 of its Statute:
- international conventions and treaties;
- international custom;
- general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;
- court decisions and doctrines of the most qualified specialists in international law.

In addition, if the parties to the dispute agree, the Court may decide the case on the basis of the principle ex aequo et bono, that is, in fairness, without limiting itself to the applicable rules of international law.

And the most interesting.

It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution is prescribed that international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems. Say, we don’t recognize, we are sending, we are all so proud and independent that right now we will calibrate everyone!

Yeah ... And who will tell me why Gazprom, having lost the court with Naftogaz, losing slippers, rushed to transfer money? Yes, and considering that cheap got off?

We are all so cool ... With Caliber!

Everything is simple. There are international standards under which ALL parties to proceedings are required to act. And if one of the parties decides that international law is for the wimps, then be sure that this side will be immediately understood.

And not aircraft carriers.

If Gazprom, having lost the court of last resort to Naftogaz, refused to pay, then it would simply run into the confiscation of its assets on the territory of those countries that are civilized. And given the fact that it’s kind of like a state-owned company, it could easily be possible to seize any property of the Russian Federation around the world against Gazprom’s legal debts.

And if someone does not believe, then I advise you to recall how the embassies in the United States were closed.

To summarize, I can say the following. The coolest country in terms of democracy, the United States, has 7 articles in the Constitution. And it’s very, I note, that it lives quite well.

For comparison: the Indian Constitution consists of 465 articles, 12 major annexes, more than 70 amendments.

It’s not a question, you can fuck everything in the constitution. At least a change of signals at a traffic light. Anything. The constitution becomes the basic law only when it is strictly implemented. And it is not a toy for everyone who can afford to reach it.

So far, in Russia it turns out that way. A huge number of amendments are aimed solely at ensuring the rule of those who today really have power in Russia. That is, the oligarchy.

Want an example? Easy.

Central Bank type regulator. Which should be the first to guard the interests of the ruble. So far, for all of her rule, Ms. Nabiullina has fulfilled ONE promise: to let the ruble go into free fall and not support it.

He, sickly, has since fallen. The only question is how quickly it will reach 100 per dollar. In what comes - no doubt. All prerequisites are created.

Of course, gentlemen, our patriots are sure that as soon as the Constitution of the Russian Federation is added that the Central Bank is obliged to take care of the ruble exchange rate, it will immediately become 30 per dollar.

Well, dream it is not forbidden.

No, it’s clear that agents of the State Department were to blame for the catastrophic fall of the ruble, who pushed Novak out of the OPEC meeting room and broke his pen so that he couldn’t sign anything.

The best slogan: “vote, or lose.” The funniest thing is that they vote. And they lose. With the stubbornness of neighbors whose rake dances are national fun. But at least they can afford to experiment with the presidents. What if you're lucky?

Unlucky. But ours do not even try. What for?

We must accept the amendments, because Putin so wanted - we will accept. Without going into details that 97% of the Constitution is dedicated to the fact that a handful of politicians and oligarchs will rule almost forever. What for? The main thing is that the family will only be treated as a union of a man and a woman. There are no other problems in Russia, right? And God is officially recognized.

Dual citizenship will be banned for officials ... Wow, what a progressive step ... God, whoever needs it, whoever steals, he just then, having vacated his chair, will buy this citizenship and calmly leave there, to live honestly worked out.

Chubais does not have a second citizenship. No, Nabiullina. No, Medvedev. No Gref. No Sechin. No Serdyukov. Do you feel better, gentlemen, patriots? I have listed, it turns out, the most worthy and honest, who do not have citizenship other than Russian. Everything is fine, we are building a crowd and bring down a bright future.

Well, or accept the new Constitution. Because, it turns out, it’s important to accept all the amendments. Of course, it’s important. The only question is to whom.

After all, everything is already thought out, it remains only to vote. For the Constitution, which undoubtedly, as soon as it is adopted, it will make everyone rich and drag it into a brighter future.

Gentlemen, doesn’t it bother you that the same people as 10 years ago will execute the Constitution? And they will obviously perform in exactly the same way?

It doesn’t bother. Clear.

For the rest, who are not among them, I will allow myself to give only one call to action. Think. Think and draw conclusions. The conclusions are primarily about how much what is being declared today is in line with expectations and reality. How much can you believe those who do things like pension robbery, Plato, games with the ruble and gas prices that grow only in Russia. And further down the list.

Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.
Author:
Photos used:
kremlin.ru
388 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Aerodrome
    Aerodrome 26 March 2020 05: 51 New
    37
    About the new Constitution of the Russian Federation: comments
    Роман, в общем то прав, это -новая конституция будет ( в том что будет сомневаться не приходится,всё сделано, осталась "косметика".) и конечно ужас,что "пакетом" идёт ""референдум""-да, с двумя "кавычками"... маскируются неплохие поправки,вкупе с ахинеей,и откровенными пунктиками "под себя". пусть переносят...не иду.решил. бессмысленно играть с тем,у кого три туза в рукаве.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 26 March 2020 06: 25 New
      90
      You cannot argue with the Leader of the world proletariat!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Machito
        Machito 27 March 2020 16: 32 New
        +7
        The amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation actually establish the dictatorship of the oligarchy. Changes to the Constitution were adopted by all public authorities in less than a week. In order to give the appearance of legitimacy to the amendments to the Constitution, it was decided to hold a popular vote, which does not solve anything. The decision has already been made by all levels of government, but postponed until a deliberative vote is held with the people.
        The authorities became generous from the successful constitutional coup and granted the people the right of consultative vote.
        Meanwhile, according to the current Constitution of the Russian Federation, the main source of power is the people.
        The constitution is trampled. Welcome to the dictatorship of the capitalists with the Russian Guard on guard of their interests.
        1. Victor N
          Victor N 27 March 2020 17: 30 New
          -9
          Useful corrections. They passed quickly because the people in power were smart and intelligent, and it was not for nothing that the people chose them. And the dull hiss and spit.
        2. Nikza
          Nikza 28 March 2020 17: 36 New
          0
          So what? The previous Constitution has not been implemented and this will be interpreted as they need. The author is right. The point is not in the law, but in those who monitor its implementation. And the people in general do not care for everything. There is a smartphone with rollers and even though the grass does not grow.
    2. Gene84
      Gene84 26 March 2020 06: 34 New
      57
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Roman, in general, is right

      The novel is not just right; Roman wrote a wonderful article! There is something to think about and make the right decision on the voting procedure for the adopted constitutional amendments.
      1. Svarog
        Svarog 26 March 2020 07: 09 New
        37
        Quote: Gene84
        The novel is not just right; Roman wrote a wonderful article!

        Поддерживаю.. Роман разнес "патриотов" по каждому пункту..
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 26 March 2020 07: 46 New
          29
          Quote: Svarog
          I support .. Роман разнес "патриотов" по каждому пункту..

          Recently, they generally look faded.
          1. kjhg
            kjhg 26 March 2020 09: 01 New
            37
            Quote: Stas157
            Quote: Svarog
            I support .. Роман разнес "патриотов" по каждому пункту..

            Recently, they generally look faded.

            There is a rational explanation for this. According to the box, they can’t say anything intelligible (they’re not capable of thinking on their own), except for appealing for amendments such as idiotic that marriage is a union of a man and a woman. But it is written in black and white in the family code! Or, the same idiotic record that Russia was created by God. And they want it in the Constitution, in the 21st century, Karl! In the West, in this regard, they look at us as if they had completely gone crazy. And I honestly understand them. This is the same thing that a couple of centuries ago the Constitution would have written that the Earth is flat and rests on three pillars. But, unfortunately, the power of propaganda is such that it can both create in good hands and destroy it, falling into the hands of dark forces. This was clearly demonstrated to us by the Germans in the 20th century. The current Russian government is doing its best to recall this by manipulating, zombifying and mocking its people. But we have two significant advantages over the German people of those times. This is the Internet and a good memory of the Soviet past. Therefore, I believe that the current government in the foreseeable future is doomed to overthrow, condemn and hold a people's trial over it.
            PS Many thanks to Roman for his righteous work. There is confidence that while there are such people, we will not slip to the level of the 3rd Reich.
            1. Gene84
              Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 07 New
              18
              Quote: kjhg
              the power of propaganda is such that it can both create, in good hands, and destroy it, falling into the hands of dark forces.

              The authorities are no less convinced that street campaigning is a death sentence for her, that it takes only 2-3 years to pass — and she will face the ghost of a popular revolution.
              Russian Social Democratic Party
              and her immediate tasks. 1901 //
              Op., Vol. 1, p. 26-28.

              https://www.politpros.com/bulletin/read/?ID=1189&bulletin=115
          2. I
            I 26 March 2020 09: 06 New
            -18
            ,, Quote: Svarog
            Поддерживаю.. Роман разнес "патриотов" по каждому пункту..

            They have recently looked generally faded. ,,


            It all depends on the goals of the author and admins. As they need, they look so.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Den717
          Den717 26 March 2020 11: 41 New
          -11
          Quote: Svarog
          Роман разнес "патриотов" по каждому пункту..

          Я в целом не против "разносов", если это осуществлено доказательно и обоснованно. Только вот не задача - статья называется не "разнос патриотов", а "о новой конституции. комментарии". Не в ту сторону попер автор. Вместо конституции автор начал высказывать обиды критике статьи. Содержание статьи "о новой конституции" я бы видел примерно таким образом:
          "....Если кратко, то содержание следующее:
          1. The Council of State is a simple organ under the president; no additional constitutional powers have been issued to him.
          The federal law on a state body is a ritual phenomenon; it exists even in relation to the Public Chamber. The State Council will not even get the right to legislative initiative.
          2. The President will not be able to hold office for more than two terms at all. The "Anti-Solzhenitsyn" amendment for the 1993 presidential candidates (10 years of residence in Russia) has been clarified and strengthened - now you need to live for at least 25 years and never have foreign citizenship or residence permit.
          But Natalya Poklonskaya will be able to become president - for the case of the entry of foreign states or their parts into Russia they made exceptions .....
          Or so:
          "....В условиях жизни по одной и той же Конституции в прошлом и нынешнем веке весьма показательно, как изменились политические подходы в системе сдержек и противовесов при формировании Конституционного суда. В 1994–1995 гг. имели место запоминающиеся примеры, когда из шести представленных Совету Федерации кандидатур на вакантные места в суде, утверждалась одна, в лучшем случае — три. Теперь уже многие годы алгоритм другой: одного представляют и назначают. Но Совет Федерации имеет по Конституции прежние полномочия, никто их не отнимал — он проводит тайное голосование. Значит, действуют какие-то другие факторы.

          Even the tactics of using the Constitution has changed. President Yeltsin objected to the version of the law on the protection of cultural property adopted by the Federal Assembly, but since his veto had been overcome, he had to sign this law and then turn to the Constitutional Court with a request to declare it unconstitutional. It is impossible to name such a precedent in the current situation: it is excluded due to the mentality of power, which leads to paralysis of the mechanisms of the Constitution, to their replacement by other forms of interaction, not at all through a system of checks and balances.

          Сейчас на уровне Конституции предлагается закрепить непосредственное подчинение президенту всех правительственных «силовых» ведомств, а также его полномочия по назначению их руководителей, и нет даже высказываний против такой поправки. А в 1992 году в Конституционном суде был обжалован и лишен юридической силы как не согласующийся с принципом разделения властей указ президента об объединении двух ведомств этой категории — МВД и ФСБ...."
          This is what the analysis of the proposed amendments should look like.
          And this
          We must accept the amendments, because Putin so wanted - we will accept. Without going into details that 97% of the Constitution is dedicated to the fact that a handful of politicians and oligarchs will rule almost forever. What for? The main thing is that the family will only be treated as a union of a man and a woman. There are no other problems in Russia, right? And God is officially recognized.

          Dual citizenship will be banned for officials ... Wow, what a progressive step ... God, whoever needs it, whoever steals, he just then, having vacated his chair, will buy this citizenship and calmly leave there, to live honestly worked out.

          more like a high school student essay on the theme of the day.
          1. Gene84
            Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 11 New
            +9
            Quote: Den717
            Не в ту сторону попер автор. Вместо конституции автор начал высказывать обиды критике статьи. Содержание статьи "о новой конституции" я бы видел примерно таким образом:

            This was in the previous article. In this article, the author decided to analyze the comments.
            1. Den717
              Den717 26 March 2020 13: 43 New
              -14
              Quote: Gene84
              In this article, the author decided to analyze the comments.

              And what did you make out? Some tears and resentment of a misunderstood genius ...
              1. Victor N
                Victor N 26 March 2020 15: 39 New
                -9
                The Constitution is a form of agreement on public consent on the basis of not a consensus, but a COMPROMISE. The procedure for the formation of this agreement is carried out by democratic institutions - elected authorities, with the participation of representatives of the public in the discussion. As the last could be each of us. Who did not have time - he was late. There are simply no other forms of discussion: you won’t collect it. Everything is simple. But, apparently, the author and many commentators do not understand this. And the author bears moral responsibility for his work. (Sometimes legal). As an editorial for publication.
                That the first article, that the second - do not carry any construct. Grunts on the basis of misunderstanding and excitement of artless readers.
              2. LeonidL
                LeonidL 26 March 2020 21: 58 New
                -4
                Вывод Скоморохова как всегда однозначен - "всё пропало!", "власти тупые", "дураков много - умныйе лишь Роман, Тимохин, примкнувший к ним физик ...", кто не согласен с Романом и дураки. Так по всем статейкам проходит. Бал правят псевдоизобретатели, квазиадмиралы и политические аналитики сомнительной политической ориентации. И все эти сэры и мистеры кучкуются под флагом добродетелей и доброжелателей России. После перекупки сайта некими мутными канадскими деятелями ждать от этой публики большего просто бесполезно. Забанят и слава богу. Баньте уж на постоянно.
        3. Vadim237
          Vadim237 26 March 2020 12: 30 New
          -22
          We have patriots, there are financial and industrial patriots, there are military patriots and patriots in other spheres of society, and there are patriots for whining every day with snotty articles in which everything is heaped together and on topics that have already been sucked and licked from all sides thousands of times but keep your audience and feed, after all, let them at least give a damn.
        4. Honest Citizen
          Honest Citizen 26 March 2020 14: 12 New
          +5
          Quote: Svarog
          Поддерживаю.. Роман разнес "патриотов" по каждому пункту..

          Сейчас прибежит некто Петров, и одним "Явамвыберу" перечеркнет все труды. Ибо думать для "патриота" - непосильная работа. laughing
      2. Stas157
        Stas157 26 March 2020 07: 27 New
        38
        Surprisingly, it is precisely those who see the urgent need for an amendment to ban the alienation of territory have always been FOR Putin. Which for a long time conducted backstage negotiations with the Japanese in the Kuril Islands and bluntly said that you can pair the island with the Japanese and give ... for a piece of peace.

        Откуда такое непостоянство и переменчивость? А все от того, что запутенцы всегда колеблются с "линией партии". У них нет никакой своей твердой позиции. Кроме одной - слепой веры в Путина.
        1. military_cat
          military_cat 26 March 2020 08: 03 New
          17
          Quote: Stas157
          Except for one - blind faith in Putin.
          Amendment - except for blind faith in propaganda, if it fits into their post-Soviet resentment.
        2. Stirbjorn
          Stirbjorn 26 March 2020 09: 30 New
          17
          Quote: Stas157
          Откуда такое непостоянство и переменчивость? А все от того, что запутенцы всегда колеблются с "линией партии". У них нет никакой своей твердой позиции. Кроме одной - слепой веры в Путина.

          У Оруэлла в "1984" это называлось - двоемыслие!
        3. lelik613
          lelik613 27 March 2020 18: 30 New
          -2
          Amendment ... of the belief that they will capitalize on this
        4. alecsis69
          alecsis69 28 March 2020 01: 14 New
          -2
          You repeat the ravings of liberals about Putin’s desire to give the islands. If you bother to look at the conditions under which it is possible to transfer the two islands of Japan, you would see that it is not a piece of paper, but the neutral status of Japan with the inevitable ban on the deployment of foreign military bases on its territory. And the two islands in question, this is actually a pile of stones located on the outside of the main ridge, that is, not having strategic importance, unlike the other two islands.
        5. bayard
          bayard 28 March 2020 07: 11 New
          +3
          Quote: Stas157
          Surprisingly, it is precisely those who see the urgent need for an amendment to ban the alienation of territory

          I understand that you are for the alienation of territories?
          Quote: Stas157
          FOR Putin. Which for a long time conducted backstage negotiations with the Japanese in the Kuril Islands and bluntly said that you can pair the island with the Japanese and give

          Are you sure of that?
          What did you want to give?
          And why then with such joy and enthusiasm supported Mashkov’s proposal?
          Or do you think that Mashkov is so - impromptu?
          Or is it not noticeable to you from home how you had to maneuver on the diplomatic front, while you were able to somehow cover the Far Eastern borders?
          If I really wanted to give, I would give for a long time. Just in an explicit order, and I would have found a reason for this.
          But Russian diplomacy was exhausting the Japanese with negotiations for years, until there was at least some potential for force containment of the excessively zealous samurai.
          And now, a special article of the Constitution will explicitly FORBID not only negotiating on such a topic, but even simply discussing it at the international level. And our diplomats will finally breathe calmer. Indeed, such negotiations surely brought little pleasure to them.
          Do you admire the opus of Roman?
          His heated grievances and bile, splashed onto the audience of VO?
          His longing for even a bush to call the wolf a bastard?
          Он столько места уделил в своём опусе Центробанку , назвав его "госучреждением" , но не словом не обмолвился о том что же это за структура и кто является её учредителем ...
          But he KNOWS it.
          Knows, but prefers to fool around.
          - 49,5% of the Central Bank shares are owned by the US Federal Reserve.
          - 49,5% of the shares in London City.
          - 1% belongs to citizen Gerashchenko - the first head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and the main lobbyist of its creation.
          This is the control body of international banking structures behind the financial system of the Russian Federation, imposed on the drunken criminal Yeltsin. And its activities, rights and powers are determined by the Law on the Central Bank and the tripartite agreement between these financial institutions and the Russian Federation.
          Именно поэтому Россия не имеет права вести самостоятельную монетарную политику , САМА проводить эмиссию рублевой массы и кредитовать свою экономику , САМА принимать решение о поддержании курса рубля к иным валютам , САМА контролировать банковский сектор . И ОБЯЗАНА выполнять ВСЕ "рекомендации" МВФ и Всемирного Банка .
          Do you really think that Roman does not know this?
          He knows!
          Мы с ним общались на эту тему , но в диалоге он ведёт себя как украинский тролль "а что тут такого , а всё равно не понимаю".
          He and others like him are now leading people to protest and sabotage the popular vote.
          Yes, all the main reasons for this constitutional reform are legislatively, on the basis of the Constitution, to receive the right of the Russian State to terminate ALL international treaties and obligations that do not meet Russia's national interests and contradict (after amendments) the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
          That is why these powers are needed in order to DENOMATE all these shameful agreements:
          - agreement on the Central Bank
          - About juvenile justice (when foreign structures take away children from Russian families).
          - An agreement on the supremacy of international law over Russian law (now IT is spelled out in the Constitution).
          - an agreement on the Budget Rule, according to which Russia does not have the right to manage even money earned from foreign trade, in excess of the ceiling set by the IMF.
          и многие другие "замечательные" документы , о которых Вы даже не знаете(есть и таковые) .
          And do not lie (I am to the author of the article) that Putin did not attempt to get rid of this bondage before.
          Did.
          But it didn’t. In 2005, when an incredible effort of all government lived, he almost completely repaid all external debts of the Russian Federation, the USSR and even RI.
          An attempt was made to gain exactly FINANCIAL independence. With the nationalization of the Central Bank and the entire banking sector.
          Yes ! Exactly . None of the commercial private banks should have remained in the country.
          But it didn’t work out.
          People died - his friends, set to solve this problem.
          And an ultimatum was presented from the owners of the money.
          Have you heard about this?
          I am sure that if you had heard, you would have a completely different idea of ​​the world around you.
          The last time did not work, because neither military nor economic potential allowed us to defend our right to sovereignty.
          And I had to retreat.
          And save up strength and resources for the next attempt.
          Now the military potential, and the external contour provided by Russian diplomacy, and the economic stability of the state give real chances for victory.
          Otherwise, we simply will not.
          On the Earth .
          And it is not we who challenge.
          The challenge is thrown to us.
          This is WAR.
          And in conditions of war, mobilization of all the healthy forces of society is needed.
          And the unhealthy part must be isolated and uprooted.
          In any case, from the government, finance and business.

          And just don’t think that I’m bending over - I’ve been living in the war for the sixth year.
          Present.
          Where bullets and shells do not make out political views and family clan preferences.
        6. Lekz
          Lekz 31 March 2020 16: 58 New
          +2
          С чего вы решили, что сторонники Путина поддерживают передачу "спорных" островов Японии? Как раз все "пропутинцы", в отличие от вас, понимают, что договор заключить надо, а для этого нужно вести переговоры. А если бы Путин видел возможность передачи островов Японии, он бы давно это сделал. А чтобы ни у кого не осталось иллюзий, нужно запись в Конституции.
      3. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 29 New
        33
        Quote: Gene84
        The novel is not just right; Roman wrote a wonderful article! There is something to think about and make the right decision on the voting procedure for the adopted constitutional amendments.

        I also agree with Skomorokhov, it is a pity I could not discuss the first article, but I am against the amendments, and even more so without a referendum.
        And now all the puzzles are developing since they are nature itself against Putin, his corrections and his lifelong reign.
        I don’t go to any voting plans.
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 26 March 2020 07: 37 New
          14
          Quote: Stroporez
          Any hand I won’t go to the vote.

          I, too!
          1. Romey
            Romey 26 March 2020 08: 29 New
            +9
            I, too, for the boycott. But a boycott is only effective when less organized. And this is a problem. But in general it would be nice to discuss this matter.
            1. Leshy1975
              Leshy1975 26 March 2020 11: 43 New
              +7
              Quote: romey
              I, too, for the boycott. But a boycott is only effective when less organized. And this is a problem. But in general it would be nice to discuss this matter.

              Me too - DO NOT go. There, the whole procedure was redone for only one thing - that it would be impossible to verify how exactly they voted. In such conditions, it is a pure crossbow. Just create a picture for PR to propagandists. They will announce that the people have actively and massively supported. hi
              1. aybolyt678
                aybolyt678 27 March 2020 08: 56 New
                -3
                Quote: Leshy1975
                Me too - DO NOT go

                And here I go and vote against. Only the authorities have already understood that the people will be against and support the coronavirus for handling their affairs
          2. balunn
            balunn 26 March 2020 08: 49 New
            10
            Comrades, we must go. You have to go and express your attitude. If you do not go your vote will be considered as something that you agree. Another thing is that then it’s not possible to actually calculate how much for and how much against
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. snake
              snake 26 March 2020 10: 54 New
              14
              Quote: balunn
              Comrades, we must go.

              Не надо идти. Смысла никакого. Что будет явка, что не будет - жулики свои поправки примут. Игнором или своим активным ПРОТИВ мы ничего не добьёмся. А так лучше потратить своё время на что-нибудь более продуктивное: ну там, с семьёй побыть, кино посмотреть или книгу почитать. Вспомните Марка нашего Твена: "Если бы от нас что-то зависело, нас бы на выборы не приглашали".
              Единственное, что вселяет в меня надежду, так это то, что когда/если власть в РФ сменится, то при поиске козла отпущения за предыдущие "прорывы", все эти конституции-шманституции учитываться не будут.
              Можно только испортить явку устроителям цирка, но и только. И ещё мне кажется, что призывают идти и голосовать "против" - путинисты. Поправки так или иначе примут, но с хорошей явкой это будет выглядеть "полегитимнее". Не ходите на эти псевдовыборы. Берегите своё время и нервы. Они нам ещё понадобятся.
              1. AK1972
                AK1972 26 March 2020 11: 53 New
                10
                Quote: serpent
                No need to go. No meaning. What will happen, what will not - the crooks will accept their amendments.

                Absolutely agree. I will say more, the amendments have already been adopted. Yesterday a video hit the u-tube, in Belgorod, the book 2020 already has a beautiful cover in the bookstore.
              2. Sling cutter
                Sling cutter 26 March 2020 16: 26 New
                +5
                Quote: serpent
                serpent (Sergey)

                Comrade, you’re saying everything correctly, only a total boycott !!!
              3. aybolyt678
                aybolyt678 28 March 2020 12: 04 New
                +1
                Quote: serpent
                No need to go. No meaning.

                I think the point is that everyone should use their one / fifty millionth share people's power
                1. Victor N
                  Victor N 28 March 2020 16: 04 New
                  +1
                  I believe that it is necessary to make it mandatory for citizens to participate in the elections. How is it in Argentina ?. In case of failure to appear, fine and restrict rights.
                  1. aybolyt678
                    aybolyt678 28 March 2020 17: 56 New
                    0
                    Quote: Victor N
                    I believe that it is necessary to make it mandatory for citizens to participate in the elections. How is it in Argentina ?. In case of failure to appear, fine and restrict rights.

                    restrict rights necessarily! or as an option, if you fail to appear, delegate your authority to someone else you trust
          3. Svarog
            Svarog 26 March 2020 09: 07 New
            +3
            Quote: Stas157
            Quote: Stroporez
            Any hand I won’t go to the vote.

            I, too!

            I don’t go to vote either!
            1. New Year day
              New Year day 26 March 2020 20: 24 New
              +8
              Quote: Svarog
              I don’t go to vote either!

              не будет ни какого голосования, господа-товарищи! "Кина не будет, свет кончился"
              1. alecsis69
                alecsis69 28 March 2020 01: 17 New
                +4
                Просто шабаш какой то. Все повторяют "Эхо Москвы" и напрочь отключили мозг. И как такое могло произойти со столь уважаемым ресурсом?
                1. bayard
                  bayard 28 March 2020 07: 42 New
                  +1
                  Quote: alecsis69
                  Все повторяют "Эхо Москвы" и напрочь отключили мозг. И как такое могло произойти со столь уважаемым ресурсом?

                  Накопленные обиды и разочарования от "Пенсионной реформы" и прочих подарков правительства Медведева .
                  Compelled concessions under the pressure of superior external forces are perceived by many as malicious intent and criminal conspiracy.
                  The site has left a lot of serious, wise life and experience of members of the forum. In any case, they stopped commenting. And the content on the site dipped very high quality. And pretty yellowed.
                  But it all began as a veteran military site ...
                  Alas, everything is in the past.
                  And those who stayed often do not want to analyze and think critically - they live with emotions, with short RAM ...
                  If in the end they get what they are trying to achieve — breaking the Constitutional amendments and asserting colonial law over Russia forever ... THEY DESERVED THIS.
                  request
                  Right now they are throwing minuses and will rejoice, like small children who ran away from their parents and mated behind a cyan camp.
                  Their choice.
                  But then there will be no one to blame.
                2. Lekz
                  Lekz 31 March 2020 16: 54 New
                  +1
                  So they are multi-pitters. So the output and salary are greater.
              2. bayard
                bayard 28 March 2020 07: 27 New
                +3
                Quote: Silvestr
                "Кина не будет, свет кончился"

                End of the world ? belay
                Well quarantine.
                Well, they’ll postpone the vote.
                Just think time will be at your leisure.
                В том числе сверить своё мнение , со столь "уважаемым" ресурсом , как "Эхо Москвы" . У меня такое впечатление , что в стране не эпидемия от короновируса , а ветрянка от "Эха Москвы .
                For such a previously serious site like VO, this is a shame.
                Or a coincidence?
                But in quarantine, we’ll think about what kind of a fad it is.
        2. basmach
          basmach 26 March 2020 08: 42 New
          16
          Valera, hi. It is all of course so. Only go to vote, it is NECESSARY. AGAINST. For you will not come, they will vote for you. Believe me, I was not in the same commission. And he ran for three times already (although I needed it?) Here is an example from last year. With a remote ballot box (no observers were taken — no place was found in the car), 3 (seventy-two) addresses (most of the private houses) were bypassed in 72 HOURS and voted on. Ours then ran selectively - one house burned down. they were very surprised at one more address; nobody came to them and they were going to vote on the polling station. Pay a courtesy visit. The more it comes and says no to this bullshit, the harder it is to drag it through. This is a civic position - not hiding in the bushes.
          1. Romey
            Romey 26 March 2020 09: 03 New
            16
            Коллега, это так конечно плюс еще мертвые души, но все таки мне кажется главные махинации начинаются в ТИКах с протоколами. Там и с явкой и с количеством голосов непонятки и странности. В общем посчитают как надо и кому надо. Если говорить о бойкоте, то главный плюс, это срыв в видимости "единого порыва", главный минус трудность осуществления, ибо туда сцаными тряпками начнут сгонять "путинскую гвардию", учителей, медработников, и прочую забитую бюджетную мелкоту, которая привыкла исполнять волю начальства досконально, либо по привычке, либо,что чаще, из за "как бы чего не случилось"... Вот такие вот парадоксы, что самая униженная и бесправная часть общества является самой преданной своему вождю.
          2. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 26 March 2020 13: 38 New
            11
            Quote: basmach
            basmach (Konstantin)


            Kostya, hi! With all due respect, I won’t go to vote.
            I explain my position, as a Citizen I consider the holding of this vote absolutely illegitimate and I am not going to create an extras. For almost 30 years I went to the polls, I have always been against 1991 of Putinism against ebnism, I have never shared them and considered them a whole. And now I won’t go and by this I declare a boycott of the authorities.
            But if someone guesses to declare a rally, a strike, a strike, a protest on the election day, then I will come in the forefront, but not to TIU, but to the square. soldier
            1. Honest Citizen
              Honest Citizen 26 March 2020 14: 21 New
              +5
              Hello Valera.
              I admit you were right. And in the year 14 and after. Forgive me, fool.
              1. Sling cutter
                Sling cutter 26 March 2020 16: 22 New
                +8
                Quote: Honest Citizen
                Honest Citizen (Sergey)

                Come on, Seryoga, everyone is mistaken, the main thing you understand what and when you were wrong or rather mistaken. The worst thing is that here half does not understand or does not want to understand what is happening and what will happen to them next.
                I shake my hand, Seryoga! good drinks
                1. Honest Citizen
                  Honest Citizen 26 March 2020 16: 30 New
                  +4
                  Самое хреновое в том, что сейчас применяются теже приемы для массового оболванивания населения, которые были опробованы на Украине. Там же не сразу, из ниоткуда вылезли все эти недобитки. У нас происходит тоже самое, только под "патриотическими" лозунгами.
                  And this is scary.
                  1. bayard
                    bayard 28 March 2020 08: 40 New
                    +1
                    Sergei, do you remember when and under what conditions the current constitution was adopted?
                    Who wrote it and ruled?
                    And what did this lead to?
                    But I still feel uneasy from the memories.
                    А ведь мне довелось общаться и с некоторыми депутатами того - расстрелянного Верховного Совета , и с защитниками того здания , и с офицерами группы "Вымпел" , которые вместе с "Альфой" остановили тогда ту бойню в центре Москвы и на своих автобусах вывезли депутатов на свою базу - под охрану , ибо узнали , что Ельцин приказал ни одного депутата в живых не оставлять ...
                    Aren't you scared for those events?
                    А ведь именно сразу после них и под давлением тех событий была в пожарном порядке принята новая "Конституция" , по которой и поныне прозябает прежде Великая , а нынче просто Россия ...
                    Are you really so happy with this document, compiled by the US CIA, that you are ready for any sabotage, if only not to correct the crime committed then?
                    Think about it, the vote is postponed anyway because of the epidemic. Leisurely . Work with the primary sources, study the question ...
                    Inexperienced citizens of Russia, and then caught on emotions, turned their heads in a series of bloody events and lies ...
                    Do not repeat the old mistakes of the older generation. Then I myself was still young, did not know everything and did not understand everything.
                    Вы точно уверенны , что Путин , это зло , а на "Эхо Москвы" святые люди ?
                    You have not noticed how much your emotional opinion coincides with the opinion of enemies?
                    Real, historical, proven and matted enemies.
                    Doesn't it seem STRANGE to you?
                    Don't you just want to sit down and think about the nature of your behavior?
                    About the sources of your opinion?
                    How fair and justified is it?
                    What will your initiatives and spiritual impulses lead to?
                    Yes, in such conditions, when an intelligent person thinks in completely different categories ...
                    Do you not understand that no later than the beginning of summer war may break out?
                    The real one is not cinematic.
                    And not far away ...
                    That in recent years the country has been preparing precisely for this - they are preparing for war.
                    And this is not our choice.
                    This is US CHALLENGE.
                    And the intention to break these enslaving agreements means only one thing - THE CHALLENGE IS ACCEPTED BY US.
                    And the question is about the survival of the State and the PEOPLE.
                    No more, no less .
                    Think.
                    There is still time.
          3. snake
            snake 26 March 2020 14: 58 New
            +3
            Quote: basmach
            Only go to vote, it is NECESSARY. AGAINST. For don't come you will vote for you.

            То есть, басмач понимает, что система голосования в России гнилая (голосуй не голосуй, всё равно получишь буй), но тем не менее зовёт голосовать... Зачем, спрашивается? Не придёшь ты - проголосуют за тебя. Придёшь, проголосуешь против - напишут, что ты - ЗА... Смысл во всей этой свистопляске? Идти на голосование и голосовать "против" на голосовании, организованном самими жуликами? Нонсенс, мать его...
            Ещё раз повторюсь: те, кто призывает идти на голосование и голосовать ПРОТИВ - путинисты, желающие картинку "народного выбора" сделать поярче. Не тратьте своё драгоценное время на участие в узаконивании олигархической власти.
            1. basmach
              basmach 26 March 2020 20: 35 New
              +2
              Прежде чем назвать меня "путинистом"- мои коменты предыдущие почитайте.
          4. New Year day
            New Year day 26 March 2020 20: 25 New
            10
            Quote: basmach
            Only go to vote, it is NECESSARY. AGAINST.

            " Плохая власть именно потому и руководит, пока хорошие люди сидят дома"
        3. BARKHAN
          BARKHAN 26 March 2020 09: 02 New
          15
          Quote: Stroporez
          Anyone will not go to the voting plans

          I’ll go to the vote and vote against. And all my friends I will agitate to vote against. Against the impudence of the scam. This is a sneaky, undisguised scam. In order for the referendum to be correct, there should be an opportunity to vote for each item separately ... then yes, at least some kind of attempt to justice.
          The referendum is now being postponed because the people will be embittered by April 22.
          If you don’t go and vote against, then there will only be more people voting for.
          1. Gene84
            Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 31 New
            11
            I fully support your opinion. need to go and vote against! hi
          2. snake
            snake 26 March 2020 15: 01 New
            +1
            Quote: Barkhan
            I’ll go to the vote and vote against. And all my friends I will agitate to vote against. Against the impudence of a scam. This is a vile, undisguised scam.

            And you are ready to go and take part in this scam. Are you so naive that you think you can defeat the scammers in their own game? Or are you a hidden Putinist?
            1. Fan-fan
              Fan-fan 26 March 2020 20: 27 New
              +4
              You shouldn’t be so. Here is a simple question about voting that has perplexed us, we all want justice, but we ourselves cannot agree on each other. We are not united, our weakness is not organized in this.
        4. Gene84
          Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 28 New
          13
          Quote: Stroporez
          nature itself is against Putin, his corrections and his life-long reign.

          in other words, we have a crisis of power. in this case, it is appropriate to recall the words of Stalin about the crisis of power: "Как марксисты, мы должны подойти к кризису власти не только с формальной точки зрения, но, прежде всего, с точки зрения классовой. Кризис власти - это напряженная, открытая борьба классов за власть."
      4. Poor
        Poor 27 March 2020 19: 33 New
        0
        полный вариант 53 минуты 1960 г. " я нарисовал человечка"
    3. Finches
      Finches 26 March 2020 06: 37 New
      -13
      Well, if such a parsley, then for those who have a future ... - formally, to accept all these amendments, if we carefully read our laws, a decision of the State Duma and the Council of Federations in conjunction with the regional legislatures is enough! But the President decided that let the people do it! Due to the fact that GDP did just that, we are organizing local battles here! And if he had acted like a real usurper of power, we would hardly have known about these amendments, or rather would not have attached much importance ... The Duma accepts 300 amendments a day! About many of them, even deputies do not know! laughing We would live in peace - we would discuss little by little the clowning in Nenko! And so there was a reason for heated discussions with people who have a future, in them you can learn a lot about yourself ... laughing
      1. Malyuta
        Malyuta 26 March 2020 07: 01 New
        25
        Quote: Finches
        formally, for the adoption of all these amendments, if we carefully read our laws, the decisions of the State Duma and the Council of Federations in conjunction with the regional legislatures are enough! But the President decided that let the people do it!

        All this staged circus performance, in the current scenario, with a manual CEC, in the absence of observers and the possibility of Internet voting, the current president did not risk anything and became life-long, but not entirely legitimate.
        1. Finches
          Finches 26 March 2020 07: 10 New
          -11
          I can agree with the circus ... but everything else is not entirely true! Observers will be ordinary people. By the way, when discussing the Stalin Constitution of 1936, more than 6 amendments were submitted from all over the USSR from labor collectives and employees ... - why it was remembered! I now think that under Joseph Vissarionovich, the entire VO site from moderators to privates would have long benefited the country by extracting peat in the swamps of Mordovia! laughing
          1. Gene84
            Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 35 New
            16
            Quote: Finches
            I now think that under Joseph Vissarionovich, the entire VO site from moderators to privates would have long benefited the country by extracting peat in the swamps of Mordovia!

            You have a bad opinion about Comrade Stalin, a citizen of finchs. under Joseph Vissarionovich, people like you simply didn’t exist.
            how can you a citizen of finchs drown for Putin, at the same time honor the era of Stalin. What kind of wobble do you have?
            1. alecsis69
              alecsis69 28 March 2020 01: 23 New
              +2
              Очень даже понятные, и если бы Вы потрудились снять шоры с глаз, то Вы бы заметили, как Путин мучительно пытается развернуть государство на другой курс, несмотря на саботаж чиновничьего аппарата, который насаждался и тщательно выращивался ещё в 90е. А Вы живёте по принципу "я старая женщина и ни кому не верю".
      2. Svarog
        Svarog 26 March 2020 07: 10 New
        21
        And do it like a real usurper of power

        To the point .. or in another way, another coup took place .. In favor of the oligarchs ..
        1. Freeman
          Freeman 26 March 2020 17: 43 New
          0
          Quote: Svarog
          And do it like a real usurper of power

          To the point .. or in another way, another coup took place .. In favor of the oligarchs ..

          And your reluctance to use the right granted to you ( still ) сказать "НЕТ!" - вы решили этот переворот "молчаливо" поддержать.

          Silent means consent.
          From the Latin: Silentium videtur confessio (Silentium Videtur Confessio |.
          From the message of Pope Boniface VIII (1294-1303), which was included in canon law (a set of decisions of the highest authority in the Roman Catholic Church).
          1. Svarog
            Svarog 26 March 2020 19: 13 New
            +9
            Quote: Freeman
            И своим нежеланием воспользоваться предоставленным вам правом ( пока ещё ) сказать "НЕТ!" - вы решили этот переворот "молчаливо" поддержать.

            And the point is to go .. observers will not be a plus and Internet voting, they will draw what they need, but here at least there will be no turnout ..
        2. Finches
          Finches 26 March 2020 18: 52 New
          -3
          Here's a zagagulin .... laughing
      3. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 59 New
        26
        Quote: Finches
        But the President decided that let the people do it! Due to the fact that GDP did just that, we are organizing local battles here!

        -Well prince Ah, yes, Marshal, well, an eagle!
        - At once he took trouble from us!
        “And look how simple it is!”

        Wow, eh, ma ... If we knew something before ... But how to make a potion?
        I did just that! Came here! He said just that! And what of all this contributed to the prosperity of the Fatherland? WHAT?
        Could change quietly, and people would swallow ... fool Are you out of your mind? They came to him and, after all decisions taken without popular consent, they said:
        Rise, king of hope! Huh? You can’t rule while lying down.

        That’s why such a leapfrog (for this circus cannot be called a planned event in high-speed reproduction).
        And you, having lived to mature (I hope) years, are still trying to bring some kind of high understanding and wisdom of decisions under worthless efforts ...
        The chair cracked! The people are simply tired of listening to these Putin mantras, after which nothing changes for the better for ordinary people.
        ALREADY 20 YEARS !!!
        1. flicker
          flicker 26 March 2020 23: 45 New
          -1
          The people are simply tired of listening to these Putin mantras, after which nothing changes for the better for ordinary people.
          ALREADY 20 YEARS !!!
          You probably communicate with the Ukrainian people?
          Nothing is changing for the better ?! I well remember how in 90 salaries or did not pay, or paid after 3 months, or paid with frozen fish, or vodka.
          Now of course there are still many problems, but 20 years ago it was much worse.
          1. Finches
            Finches 27 March 2020 06: 30 New
            -1
            They won’t hear you - it’s a zombie - everything is bad, with ... rashka, rolling in with ... g ... - it's rude, of course, but somewhere like that! Good people, but for some reason they see only negative! There is enough real negativity in the country, but a lot of useful things have been done. I always remember the 90s - total devastation. The people did not live, but survived, but today it is still worse ... Our man cannot be pleased laughing
            1. flicker
              flicker 30 March 2020 16: 10 New
              0
              Our man can not please

              Это точно. Часть просто троллит (оголтелые русофобы), другая часть - заблудились в трех соснах, причем они уверены в своей правоте, не понимая и не видя как их разводят. Отвергают всякую манипуляцию себя со стороны, так как "они же своими глазами видят все недостатки в стране". А именно на это их и ловят. Технология примерно такая: есть стакан на половину пустой и одновременно на половину наполнен. Все его видят одинаково.
              And then they begin to convince them: you see, the glass is almost empty, although it should have been filled. Why is it empty? Yes, because it’s N.'s friends who emptied him, you see how much money they have, and look how much you have? Until N. is removed we will. And the fact that there is a glass, so soon they will stomp it and you and your children will not get anything.
              In short, we go out and knocking helmets, remove N. and life will immediately become a fairy tale. Well, you want life to become a fairy tale? Yes, I want to!
              They help to tear down N., after which not only half of the contents in the glass will remain, but also the glass itself.
              + + +
              So it was in the beginning of 90 when miners pounded helmets (for the sake of improving their lives) - in the end, they helped to destroy the country.
              The same thing is happening in Ukraine today.
              There, it also seemed to them that they all saw and understood.
              So we, like people are not bad, rightly complain about difficulties, but at the same time offer measures that will destroy the country.
              Just like a zombie.
            2. grad2308
              grad2308 31 March 2020 09: 58 New
              0
              "Нашему человеку не угодишь "
              Вы сами себе противоречите, армия была лучше в СССР - кадровые лучше "пиджаков". Разруха в 90, а сейчас "рассвет". Пример: nn-ая швейная фабрика в провинциального города, выжила в смутные годы, за счет повышения курса доллара в 1999 году, стала работать с инофирмами на давальческом сырье, среднесписочная численность на 2004 год -2400 человек. Естественно время, когда прибирали к рукам предприятия, сбербанк - не дал денег(кредит) выкупить акции у пенсионеров. Пришел "другой" инвестор" итог - банкротство. Сейчас среднесписочная численность с ИТР - 120 человек. Я Вам таких примеров могу привести по швейной отрасли в области, сколько осталось и как и сколько работает (что по количеству предприятий и численности). Провинциальные города превратились в города, где доживает пенсионеры старики с внуками, а родители на заработках в Москве или на Севере. Причем и Москва, сейчас по рабочим местам после 2014 года прикрылась... Когда уходили от плановой экономику к "рынку", государство, не регулируя ввозные пошлины, просто "грохнуло" многие отрасли и производства, дав возможность "раздербанить" наследие Советского прошлого. И Вы с мантрой, какие сейчас достижения!!!! Вы определитесь, кому давали ПРИСЯГУ? Достижений социализма нет - где достойная медицина и образование (в высшем - квоты на бесплатные места). Уровень среднего доступного катастрофически упал. Из предприятий в основной массе "выжили" военной направленности, но и на них идет оптимизация. Где продукция с предприятий не военной специфики - или Азия, или комплектующие из Азии. Полного цикла производства НЕТ!
      4. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 01 New
        17
        Quote: Finches
        But the President decided that let the people do it!

        what will the people do? will deprive someone of real estate in the warmer lands? The people are FOR !!! The Duma decided that it is possible to have real estate. And the laws of any country allow property owners to use it, hence the simplified procedure for obtaining visas and citizenship, all in vain! wassat
        Quote: Finches
        And do it like a real usurper of power

        The conductor is brilliant. Or an artist by whom Oscar cries. An atmosphere has been created in Russia when practically everything can be said, in this cacophony no reasonable opinions are heard, and decisions are made in the interests of big money. Here he is again good, proposed amendments, and the Duma changed them, the people choose the Duma, which means he is to blame! wassat
        1. flicker
          flicker 26 March 2020 23: 50 New
          0
          In Russia, an atmosphere is created when you can talk almost everything
          Okay to say, you can write articles calling to ruin the state.
          The United States allocated 80 billion rubles for the needs of these hacks.
          Here they add fuel to the fire.
      5. basmach
        basmach 26 March 2020 08: 46 New
        12
        А чего Вам о себе узнавать то. Вы ж у нас патриот (Роман о таких как раз и написал). "Жираф большой-ему видней". Завтра ветер подует в другую сторону и Вы туда же. Флюгер (я про Вас это уж давно писал).
        1. Finches
          Finches 27 March 2020 06: 37 New
          -1
          Of course, you can write, there will be no demand, but most likely you are just not a very smart person! It’s better to be a patriot like me than a blinded horse like you ... And Roman, 5 years ago, when, by the way, I sent parcels to Donbass through him, I wrote a little differently. hi
      6. flicker
        flicker 26 March 2020 23: 54 New
        -1
        Well, if such a parsley, then for those who have a future ... - formally, to accept all these amendments, if we carefully read our laws, a decision of the State Duma and the Council of Federations in conjunction with the regional legislatures is enough! But the President decided that let the people do it! Due to the fact that GDP did just that, we are organizing local battles here! And if he had acted like a real usurper of power, we would hardly have known about these amendments, or rather would not have attached much importance ... The Duma accepts 300 amendments a day! About many of them, even deputies do not know! We would live in peace - we would discuss little by little the clowning in Nenko! And so there was a reason for heated discussions with people who have a future, in them you can learn a lot about yourself ...
        Grant-eaters fiddled, and therefore I ply you with the text good
    4. Malyuta
      Malyuta 26 March 2020 06: 56 New
      14
      Quote: Aerodrome
      маскируются неплохие поправки,вкупе с ахинеей,и откровенными пунктиками "под себя".

      There is nothing normal in poravak, including a mere $ 20 in poverty eradication.
      Quote: Aerodrome
      let them bear it ... I’m not coming. I decided. it makes no sense to play with someone who has three aces up his sleeve.

      I absolutely agree with this thesis; I’m not going to participate in the Putin’s circus on lifetime canonization!
    5. siberalt
      siberalt 26 March 2020 07: 19 New
      25
      Сильная статья. Автору респект! По большому счету дискусси по конституционному (государственному -ли) праву лучше вести специалистам правоведам, да и то понимающих толк в этой отрасли права. Сформулировать закон, да еще свести его в отдельный институт (кодифицировать) не слабее чем ледокол построить от проекта до пуска. К тому же, каждый правой акт должен просчитываться со многих точек, начиная с финансовой, политической общественного восприятия и много, много чего еще. Насколько я помню конструированию правовых норм при Советах учили только на двух факультетах - МГУ и Саратовском государственном по специальности советское строительство. Есть ли такие аналоги ныне - не ведаю. Похоже, сейчас законы пишут все кому не лень, была бы должность, хотя бы депутата ГД. А уж кто там все мы видим. Певцы, артисты, боксеры и прочие "специалисты" - правоведы. Что касается нынешних поправок, то в своей основе они сводятся к переделу властных полномочий под прикрытием социальных благ, которые никто не мешал осуществлять и двадцать лет назад. Но уже заявлено об ошкуривании процентов по банковским вкладам пенсионеров, которые посмели скопить миллион деревянных (уже обесцененных почти вдвое как бы Набиуллиной), на похороны, поддержание здоровья на крайний случай, да на "бесплатное образование" для внуков.
      Good mood to you all! How we lived and we will live.
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 26 March 2020 07: 57 New
        23
        Quote: siberalt
        Strong article. Respect to the author!

        Well, as usual! The author addresses the most painful topics. And usually under his articles always most comments. Thanks to Roman for his courage. Writing such articles, and then experiencing a hail of rudeness (from some who disagree) is not a simple matter. But rating authors have no other way.
        1. depressant
          depressant 26 March 2020 08: 38 New
          19
          Yes, the written word hurts. Much more painful than said aloud in the face. He said and ran away laughing, and you spat ...
          Roman, hold on!
          Our whole life is a bad amendment from the 90s.
      2. Freeman
        Freeman 26 March 2020 09: 39 New
        +9
        sibiralt Today, 07:19
        How we lived and we will live.


        No, it won’t work out.
        Фактически заявлено, что те, кто получает больше МРОТ - "обеспеченные граждане".
        - "17 тысяч - средний класс"
        - "Имешь миллион - входишь в 1% избранных".
        Реализуется тезис - "Население - новая нефть".
        Планку определения "сверхдоходов" понижают, чтобы брать "налог на роскошь" с более широких слоев населения.
      3. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn 26 March 2020 10: 03 New
        11
        Quote: siberalt
        Но уже заявлено об ошкуривании процентов по банковским вкладам пенсионеров, которые посмели скопить миллион деревянных (уже обесцененных почти вдвое как бы Набиуллиной), на похороны, поддержание здоровья на крайний случай, да на "бесплатное образование" для внуков.
        I agree, where did they get upstairs that a million rubles is a lot of money - you can’t buy an apartment for them, and now you can buy a normal car. Type do not save citizens, and take loans at predatory interest! They continue to drive people into debt slavery. It’s like introducing a progressive tax starting at 30 thousand per month
      4. flicker
        flicker 27 March 2020 00: 36 New
        -2
        Strong article. Respect to the author!

        I will disappoint you, the author very poorly understands what he writes about. For example, this pearl:
        It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution prescribethat international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems.

        For the majority (not even lawyers) of those who have tried at least once, it is obvious that almost everything in court depends on the INTERPRETATION of what is recorded.
        And therefore all sorts of little things should be spelled out.
        Once again: SIGN UP!

        And write this:
        It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution prescribethat international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems
        maybe only a complete layman.
    6. Freeman
      Freeman 26 March 2020 08: 39 New
      10
      Quote: Aerodrome
      About the new Constitution of the Russian Federation: comments
      Роман, в общем то прав, это -новая конституция будет ( в том что будет сомневаться не приходится,всё сделано, осталась "косметика".) и конечно ужас,что "пакетом" идёт ""референдум""-да, с двумя "кавычками"... маскируются неплохие поправки,вкупе с ахинеей,и откровенными пунктиками "под себя". пусть переносят...not coming. decided. it makes no sense to play with someone who has three aces up his sleeve.


      А прийти и хотя бы попытаться "перевернуть ломберный столик", слабо?
      - "Бить шулеров канделябрами", пока не призываю.
      1. flicker
        flicker 27 March 2020 00: 39 New
        -1
        Да нет никакой "новой Конституции", есть поправки к Конституции. Автор написал не подумав, а все повторяют как попугаи. yes
        1. Freeman
          Freeman 27 March 2020 01: 03 New
          +2
          Quote: flicker
          Да нет никакой "новой Конституции", есть поправки к Конституции. Автор написал не подумав, а все повторяют как попугаи. yes

          Yeah. yes
          34 amendments amending 9 articles of the Constitution, including the establishment of a new authority (state council), a change in the federal structure (federal lands), a change in the distribution of power between branches of government - this is so, "запятые переставили".
    7. Civil
      Civil 26 March 2020 09: 52 New
      0
      Stop chatter! The result is well known.
      1. Gene84
        Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 40 New
        10
        Quote: Civil
        The result is well known.

        Share the result, but at the same time where you got such data from.
    8. Galleon
      Galleon 26 March 2020 11: 18 New
      +9
      Quote: Aerodrome
      not coming. decided.

      Here are all those here who are against the amendments and say that they will not vote, I turn to them:
      - Guys, have you sharply weakened your mind, or what? Well, don’t go - they will vote for you. THERE ARE ONLY AND NEEDED FOR THOSE WHO AGAINST DO NOT VOTE. SOLVING EVERYTHING WILL BE A SIMPLE BALANCE OF VOTES.
      What are you doing, smart and good !?
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 26 March 2020 12: 36 New
        -6
        They have long since, even with 91 sharply stupefied and lost in space.
        1. Galleon
          Galleon 26 March 2020 12: 43 New
          +9
          Ну, я не склонен к такой резкой оценке. Мы все обмануты с 1991 года. Обмануты, а не отупели. Мы жили в обществе, в основе которого декларировалось и было какое-то доверие, было обращение "товарищ". И мы не были готовы к тому обману, который с нами провернули. Поэтому и неправомерно сейчас на нас обманутых класть ответственность за то, что тогда произошло. Как можно быть виновным в том, о чем ты ничего не знал, виновным в том, что доверял? Это сейчас за 30 лет научили проверять.
          1. flicker
            flicker 27 March 2020 00: 45 New
            -3
            We are all deceived since 1991. Cheated, not stupefied

            And now they do not deceive us?
            The United States allocated 80 billion rubles to support Russian grant eaters and grant pumps.
            Нормальные деньги. Вот "умные" за которыми будущее и стараются. bully
      2. aleksejkabanets
        aleksejkabanets 26 March 2020 12: 40 New
        11
        Voting has no legal force. And I think they know the attitude of the people to power. (V.V. Putin’s appeal on coronovirus, on RT - 13 thousand likes and 20 thousand dislikes. Comments are tough.)
        1. Galleon
          Galleon 26 March 2020 12: 48 New
          10
          Regnum voted on its website for amendments. Against it was about 60%.
          1. aleksejkabanets
            aleksejkabanets 26 March 2020 12: 55 New
            +8
            A lot of people who are not friends with the Internet, they believe in the TV. Putin added a pension and more. And the bulk of people are very inert.
        2. flicker
          flicker 27 March 2020 00: 48 New
          0
          Voting has no legal force.
          Yes, legally, 2/3 of the Duma and 3/4 of the Federation Council and the president’s signature are enough to pass the amendments.
      3. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 17: 11 New
        +9
        Quote: Galleon
        DO NOT VOTE

        Is this a vote, Andrey? In accordance with what laws is it carried out? Here is a list of federal laws that determine the procedure for referenda and elections - http://www.cikrf.ru/law/federal_law/.
        Этот "Опрос" проводится в полном отрыве от всех ФЗ. Ни адекватного контроля, ни определенности в сроках. Так стоит ли винить людей за нежелание участвовать в фарсе?
        1. Galleon
          Galleon 26 March 2020 17: 35 New
          +3
          Igor, in short, yes - this is an approved lawlessness, and the second yes - you must vote to vote in order to somehow try to stop this lawlessness. Let it fail. But let those who started this lawlessness achieve their goals by deceit and forgery, and not by the results of voting and our silence on it.
          1. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 18: 57 New
            +7
            Quote: Galleon
            and secondly, yes - it’s necessary to vote, in order to somehow try to stop this lawlessness

            Three weeks ago, the same convinced everyone. But after specifying the details, he changed his mind. request Но на ближайшие выборы пойду обязательно, и думаю спихнем "любимую" ЕР, ведь сейчас даже моя мама, голосовавшая всегда за Путина, сейчас настроена против.
            1. Galleon
              Galleon 26 March 2020 19: 39 New
              +3
              I usually always see you as my like-minded drinks but, of course, some disagreements are possible and normal. Health to your mom! hi
          2. flicker
            flicker 27 March 2020 00: 50 New
            -2
            at least somehow try to stop this lawlessness.
            Поправки к Конституции это что "беззаконие"?
            1. Revival
              Revival 27 March 2020 12: 51 New
              -1
              I think that the lawlessness that is mentioned in the comments, this means how the amendments are adopted, that the rules are completely violated, a vote is not prescribed by the constitution (law).
              It seems that the very constitution says that changes to the constitution (some of the articles, and they are affected) are introduced only in two ways: a referendum or a Constituent Assembly.
              Which of these procedures is applied? None.
              And it seems that no vote is provided for by the constitution.
              See the conclusion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the amendments, they, too, could not think of anything about the justification, not prescribed by law, of the voting procedure, except that this vote has its own legal nature, so to speak, you need to understand
              1. flicker
                flicker 27 March 2020 15: 02 New
                +2
                that changes to the constitution (some of the articles, and they are affected) are introduced only in two ways: a referendum or a constituent assembly.

                I don’t know what articles you are talking about, but for the adoption of amendments to the Constitution, it is enough to get 2/3 of the Duma, 3/4 of the Federation Council and the president’s signature.
                And no, not just referenda, but just polls are not needed.
        2. Revival
          Revival 27 March 2020 12: 44 New
          -1
          Absolutely.
          Конституционный суд вынужден был об этом написать в своем заключении о конституционности поправок: "у данного голосования своя юридическая природа")))
          "Своя у него национальность была, собственная, македонскив и точка" (с).
        3. Lekz
          Lekz 31 March 2020 16: 51 New
          +2
          Этот "Опрос" проводится в полном отрыве от всех ФЗ.

          You're right. Interrogation by laws and the Constitution is not provided. All legal amendment procedures have already been completed. Dot. It remains to sign the law on amendments to the President. And to understand that something necessary is being done, he wants to know the opinion of people. For understanding only, and he has long had legal grounds. Everyone can express their opinion. It has no legal relation to referenda and elections.
      4. Campanella
        Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 07 New
        +1
        What are we doing? The main thing is who will count the votes. She (the authorities) didn’t give a damn about how anyone voted, they would write the right amount.
        Do not forget they allowed electronic voting in case it is obvious that the people did not come to the polling stations, people will say that they were safe and all voted for the updated Constitution.
        And the cameras that were put specifically at the last election will not work, so people can’t evaluate the turnout.
        So the government will approve its own Constitution.
        And thus finally put an end to itself. But Putin’s image is not important, he’s not enough to sit in his lifetime ...
    9. iouris
      iouris 26 March 2020 23: 10 New
      -2
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Roman, in general, is right,

      В чём он прав? Цитата: "Думайте. За умными людьми, возможно, будущее." Конец цитаты. Это призыв к кому? Британские учёные доказали, что 95% населения (Британии, конечно) скорее застрелятся, чем начнут думать и только 2,5% думают, что они думают. Статистика, однако.
      1. flicker
        flicker 27 March 2020 00: 55 New
        -3
        Цитата: "Думайте. За умными людьми, возможно, будущее." Конец цитаты. Это призыв к кому?

        It seems to me that the author suggests enriching while there is an opportunity.
        Well, there is evidence that the United States allocated 80 billion rubles to support grant-eaters.
        Maybe the author meant it?
    10. flicker
      flicker 26 March 2020 23: 31 New
      -4
      новая конституция будет ( в том что будет сомневаться не приходится,всё сделано, осталась "косметика".) и конечно ужас,что "пакетом" идёт ""референдум""-да, с двумя "кавычками".

      Not the new Constitution (this is the author who called it that because of great knowledge), but the amendments to the Constitution are absolutely correct, they will be adopted because they answer the basic requests of society and the society will vote for them.
      На счет "пакетом" - а нынешнюю Конституцию мы разве принимали постатейно или целиком?
      In general, in the vast majority of countries, the constitution is adopted by elected persons (national assemblies, parliaments, etc.). So when we adopted even the current Constitution, the will of the people was direct.
      На счет "референдума"
      To accept amendments to the Constitution of the authorities, it was enough to get 2/3 of the vote in the Duma, 3/4 of the vote in the Federation Council and the signature of the president.
      Не то что "референдум", а даже опроса не требовалось.
      ***
      But the government (represented by Putin) decided to give us the opportunity to express our opinion (opinion affects the adoption of amendments) to us.
      And we begin to whine.
    11. Campanella
      Campanella 27 March 2020 22: 57 New
      0
      Similarly, I decided not to go to these elections, I see no reason.
      By the way, in the American constitution, the US president cannot change his salary.
      And ours is constantly throwing money allowances on ourselves and our okhlokrats, these are such slaves in galleys.
    12. Lekz
      Lekz 31 March 2020 17: 01 New
      +1
      this is a new constitution will

      Старой, в которую будут внесены поправки, делающие ее менее "зверской".
  2. Ilya-spb
    Ilya-spb 26 March 2020 05: 52 New
    -40
    What is international law and liberal values ​​- we see in Europe, especially in Italy. Against the background of coronovirus. And that’s it.

    Here interests me:
    1) normal life in Russia.

    2) normal work in Russia.

    Yes, I'm selfish.

    Agree, I can get this with the liberals, if I accept their rules of the game, and I will live like a wolf. And in a social state. And in today's Russia.

    But why? Why I do not want to achieve these goals wolfish (liberal)? Why do I want to work honestly and calmly?

    PS And Mr. Skomorokhov is engaged in demagogy and boltology.
    1. Valery Valery
      Valery Valery 26 March 2020 06: 28 New
      -43
      Не имеет смысла комментировать и спорить с автором статьи и всеми ему подобными. И эта статья, и все "либеральные" высказывания последнего месяца - осознание их проигрыша. "Гозманы" и "чубайсы" поняли что народ России вырвался из плена их идей и начинают по этому поводу паниковать.
      In addition to all of the above, funding from abroad was reduced - another offense.
      1. Oleg Skvortsov
        Oleg Skvortsov 26 March 2020 09: 01 New
        17
        Valery, how old are you? look like a victim of an ege with brain Putinism. Although, if you grew up under the current regime and a good life milk yield, then for you the life-long consolidation of a permanent rower in galleys with his grown bureaucratic and oligarchic lawlessness and corruption is good.
        1. Valery Valery
          Valery Valery 26 March 2020 10: 36 New
          -14
          No, I didn’t take the exam and I finished school normally, back in the 80s. Therefore, there is something to compare. And you continue to be poisoned by your own poisonous hatred - your time of demagogy and sophism has passed.
          1. Gene84
            Gene84 26 March 2020 13: 54 New
            13
            Quote: Valery Valery
            finished school normal,

            sorry but not like that.
            Quote: Valery Valery
            back in the 80s. Therefore, there is something to compare

            interesting, and what exactly are you comparing?
            Quote: Valery Valery
            And you continue to be poisoned by your own poisonous hatred - your time of demagogy and sophism has passed.

            request
            all this is what you wrote, more to you
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 26 March 2020 12: 50 New
          -9
          You don’t worry, Putin will leave in the year 2024, whether Mishustin will replace someone from the GRU at the age of 72 that it will be difficult for him to control the state — he will be given a manor in Moscow and politicians and journalists will come to him from all over Russia and the world to interview him other figures will write an autobiographical book and continue to live without straining, but billionaires as they were in Russia will remain so - the market economy will not go anywhere.
      2. depressant
        depressant 26 March 2020 09: 04 New
        25
        I am sad because life has been reduced to simple survival due to the multiplication of good in moshna - not in the heads, not in the feelings ...
        И вот уже несется: "Да, я эгоист!", -- старо, как мир. Читайте Чехова, ребята-эгоисты. Он давно говорил о таких, как вы, любителях вкусно есть, сладко спать и приумножать свое добро в мошне. Не думая о том, что сладкий сон и вкусная еда -- за счет обездоленного вашей животной жадностью и силой зверя большинства.
        Sometimes a wolf appeared in a flock of sheep and cut it all. Although one is enough for saturation. But we are not sheep - remember from this.
      3. AK1972
        AK1972 26 March 2020 12: 05 New
        12
        Quote: Valery Valery
        И эта статья, и все "либеральные" высказывания последнего месяца - осознание их проигрыша. "Гозманы" и "чубайсы" поняли что народ России вырвался из плена их идей и начинают по этому поводу паниковать.

        Не видел паники у чубайса. Он руководит госкорпорацией, или я ошибаюсь? гозман тоже неплохо себя чувствует, играя "либерала". Всем находится место под солнцем при нынешнем режиме. Некоторым даже Хероя труда дают. Так что прекратите нести феерический бред.
    2. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 47 New
      18
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      Here interests me:
      1) normal life in Russia.
      2) normal work in Russia.

      And where is all this in Russia?
    3. kjhg
      kjhg 26 March 2020 09: 24 New
      15
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      Yes, I'm selfish.

      Agree, I can get this with the liberals, if I accept their rules of the game, and I will live like a wolf. And in a social state. And in today's Russia.

      The punishment for civic passivity and selfishness is the power of villains Plato. 500 BC Do you want to .. fate? Thousands of years ago, smart people said that you ... you only yourself
      1. Ilya-spb
        Ilya-spb 26 March 2020 17: 59 New
        -4
        I am not a supporter of Plato. And I’m not going to prove anything to anyone.

        By the way, I am one of the few on this site who does not hide his face under the guise of an avatar)
    4. Vadim237
      Vadim237 26 March 2020 12: 42 New
      -11
      Man to man is a wolf - the law of nature weak perishes strong survive human society will never lose this even under socialism even under capitalism, greed and envy will always be to a lesser or greater extent. With this you have to measure whether you want it or not.
      1. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 26 March 2020 13: 00 New
        16
        Quote: Vadim237
        Man to man is a wolf - the law of nature weak perishes strong survive human society will never lose this even under socialism even under capitalism, greed and envy will always be to a lesser or greater extent. With this you have to measure whether you want it or not.

        And here you pissed me off Vadimka! Strongly pissed off!
        But tell me about the human wolf, how people shared the last food and clothes, covered other people with their bodies, how they took completely stranded orphans after the war, how scientists saved the seed fund in besieged Leningrad. Remember for the rest of your life that there was such a proud name Soviet Man!
        I’ll tell you more that the generation born from 1917 to 1926 was the generation of Soviet people of the future builders of Communism, and if it weren’t for the war that mowed these generations, I would almost completely clean them up, we would still have a completely different country!
        Threat. You deserve the minus and not even one!
        Look at this:


    5. flicker
      flicker 27 March 2020 00: 57 New
      0
      PS And Mr. Skomorokhov is engaged in demagogy and boltology.
      Maybe, maybe banal commerce.
    6. Campanella
      Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 16 New
      0
      This is you a demagogue and I would say
      unscrupulous man, normal work, normal life ...
      Is the minimum wage a normal wage? Cost of living, macaroni is your norm?
  3. Pessimist22
    Pessimist22 26 March 2020 06: 00 New
    30
    I remember that in 14-15, Putin was praised in all articles on the site, and in the comments, if someone tried to reason soberly about him, then he didn’t have a lot of minuses, black shoulder straps and a ban, and five years have passed since everything changed, the future for smart people.
    1. _Sergei_
      _Sergei_ 26 March 2020 06: 13 New
      -37
      Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt. If they were not, then there is nothing to add.
      1. DMB 75
        DMB 75 26 March 2020 06: 42 New
        26
        Life experience has increased over 20 years. We see what is happening around. Nothing good, in short. Although it is useless for you to say anything, everything is fine with you and life has been successful. But not everyone is living that far.
        1. Sergey Olegovich
          Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 07: 03 New
          -23
          Quote: DMB 75
          , everything is fine with you and your life has been successful. But not everyone is living that far.

          Life is really different for everyone. Someone succeeded, someone did not. But, our president, V.V. Putin, has clearly stated everything for which amendments to the constitution are needed. Now, during the period of the outbreak of the global crisis and in the conditions of encircling Russia with enemies, in the conditions of foreign policy hard pressure, in conditions of internal political instability, when all kinds of offended people are rushing to power, we must unite around the Leader of our country. Whenever a threat arose, our people united. Now this is the situation when the people of our Great Country need to unite and jointly support decisions on the transformation of Russia and its well-being for the sake of us and our descendants. It is necessary to end disputes, abuse and especially rudeness regarding the president. You need to understand that Vladimir Vladimirovich is trying to help the people of Russia survive the difficult time safely, and he needs our support!
          1. polar fox
            polar fox 26 March 2020 07: 47 New
            19
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            You need to understand that Vladimir Vladimirovich is trying to help the people of Russia survive the difficult time safely, and he needs our support!

            круто...помг,блинн...а какому "народу" собственно он помогает?новым" героям труда"?
            1. Sergey Olegovich
              Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 08: 04 New
              -18
              To the citizens of Russia! Did you watch his performance yesterday?
              1. Ingvar 72
                Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 49 New
                16
                Quote: Sergey Olegovich
                To the citizens of Russia! Did you watch his performance yesterday?

                In addition to presentations and promises, can you give an example of assistance to Russian citizens?
                1. Fan-fan
                  Fan-fan 26 March 2020 21: 04 New
                  +6
                  Yes, he helped a lot, he took away pensions for 5 years in advance.
                  1. Ingvar 72
                    Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 23: 34 New
                    +4
                    Quote: Fan-Fan
                    Yes, he helped a lot, he took away pensions for 5 years in advance.

                    I then calculated at leisure - the minimum pension is 11 thousand rubles, for 5 years = 660 thousand rubles. This is the minimum amount that the beloved GDP threw everyone.
              2. Revival
                Revival 27 March 2020 13: 02 New
                0
                We have already watched many performances.
                " Пока я президент...
                Прошу отнестись с пониманием..." и точка.
            2. Sling cutter
              Sling cutter 26 March 2020 08: 05 New
              19
              Quote: polar fox
              а какому "народу" собственно он помогает?новым" героям труда"?

              Glory to the new hero! Plato must be renamed Rotenberg, well, and the town of some kind of district thread in Rotenberg grad, and the regional one in St. Putenburg, perpetuate the names of the heronves, well, and canonize.
          2. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 47 New
            21
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            But, our president, V.V. Putin, has clearly stated everything for which amendments to the constitution are needed. Now, during the period of the outbreak of the global crisis and in the conditions of encircling Russia with enemies, in conditions of foreign policy hard pressure, in conditions of internal political instability, when all kinds of offenders are torn to power, we must unite around the Leader of our country

            Meditating, if you consider that the leader himself created the crisis, then you should stay away from this and rally with him his work heroes. I’m kind of a little ashamed to say.
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            the people of our Great country must unite and jointly support decisions on the transformation of Russia and its well-being for the sake of us and our descendants

            Another 5 years of Putinism and the country simply will not be.
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            You need to understand that Vladimir Vladimirovich is trying to help the people of Russia survive the difficult time safely, and he needs our support!

            You, my colleague, are not doing something good for them, I personally will not accept any fate in the genocide of the peoples of Russia, but on the contrary I will oppose as much as I can.
            Get me fat Mendel, sign it !!!
            1. Sergey Olegovich
              Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 08: 15 New
              -19
              Вот и главный либерал на сайте появился. Гаспадин либерал, смените аватарку с Мальчишка на Мазепу. Не "большевик" вы. "Жирный Мендель" - это все на что вы способны. Если вы, являетесь типа сторонником коммунистов, то должны знать, что КПРФ против всякой либерастни и за целостность нашего государства. И я как сторонник КПРФ говорю вам, не позорьте движение, смените аватарку. Именно из-за таких вот либералов прячущихся под маской коммунистов, у нас и произошёл кризис в коммунистическом движении.
              You write that you do not want to participate in the genocide, but allow, what you are calling for is the genocide of the people.
              We created the crisis artificially. We are not to blame for the crisis.
              About the board another 5 years made fun, amused. Only the people in the elections will decide who will be the next president of our country by voting for candidates.
              1. Ingvar 72
                Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 53 New
                20
                Quote: Sergey Olegovich
                We created the crisis artificially. We are not to blame for the crisis.

                Not us, really. But it was our government that did everything to ensure that the crisis brought down the economy. As usual, winter unexpectedly began here. If you invest national funds in the economies of other countries, yours will not develop, others will develop. This is an axiom.
              2. balunn
                balunn 26 March 2020 09: 10 New
                18
                Well, to begin with, it was under the current government that the integrity of our state was violated. Domansky Island and the Viking shelf
                Increasing retirement age and low pensions - what is it?
              3. aybolyt678
                aybolyt678 26 March 2020 09: 11 New
                +6
                Quote: Sergey Olegovich
                Communist Party against any liberalism and for the integrity of our state.

                Рабинович всегда был против(фраза из кинофильма "На дерибасовской хорошая погода на ..."
                The CPRF today is the self-name of a group of consumers of the benefits of power. Drive out on populism. Where is the ideology of the communists? where are the underground ??? smile
              4. Vadim237
                Vadim237 26 March 2020 13: 44 New
                -11
                The crisis was not created for you artificially by the Soviet leadership systematically starting in the 50s, distorting the economy towards the military-industrial complex, relegating everything else to the background accelerating the arms race on the basis of the Second World War, the more weapons we rivet the better, and so until the mid-80s, then they began to put 120 countries on the neck beggars should be helped by friendly regimes and they helped everyone they could at their own expense under this business by increasing production party leaders in the republics promoted projects some of which were initially unprofitable but they didn’t consider the money we said. In the civilian sector, it became worse every year with the implementation of the plan since the military-industrial complex took away materials, equipment and engineers, due to the lack of modern food equipment inside the country, they started exporting tens of billions of dollars of foreign money, it needed a currency where, of course, first of all, oil sales in the 70s oil production skyrocketed and continued to increase from year to year began to spend gold reserves, and in the 80s the country began to run out of money costs oil fell the cost of the war in Afghanistan added Chernobyl US put a loaded pistol in the temple of the USSR in the form of Pershing missiles 2 in Europe, and Gorbachev realized that the USSR no longer had the means to continue the Cold War and went to the INF Treaty, and then wherever he went everywhere, he could increase prices, you couldn’t reduce spending on the republics, you couldn’t continue throwing from corner to corner with rash decisions publicity, anti-alcohol law and there’s no money to get from how much from export whether they spent the same amount of money and Hunchback ran for foreign loans from the beginning to the banks and then to the leaderships of Western countries, but this didn’t fix the deficit. In the end, the USSR fell into bankruptcy in conjunction with other acute social processes in all republics against the backdrop of politics Yeltsin and his comrades drove in - the USSR ordered a long life. The formula is simple if you double-feed Belarus and Russia feed 13 republics whose needs are growing year by year and you collectively feed half of the world at your own expense or receive a tenth of a currency or equivalent cost of exchange, be sure you have money sooner or later will end.
          3. depressant
            depressant 26 March 2020 09: 29 New
            16
            Amendments to the Constitution are needed only in order to finally legitimize by voting the right of a small group of people to the bowels of the territory of Russia and the absence of such a right for all other residents of the country. It is said that there will be no revision of the results of privatization. It was said? It was...
            By voting for the amendments, you thereby vote for the exclusion of the people from the territory of their original residence, for deprivation, for legalized poverty. And if a simple person receives some right under this constitution, then it is to be an expendable material in the economic and political games of usurper gentlemen.
            And you, advocating a positive vote, hope to become lackeys of the ruling gentlemen, differing only in the level of servility. After all, there is the opportunity to eat leftovers in the master's kitchen. What an honor and valor!
            1. military_cat
              military_cat 26 March 2020 09: 48 New
              +7
              Quote: depressant
              Amendments to the Constitution are needed only in order to finally legitimize by voting the right of a small group of people to the bowels of the territory of Russia and the absence of such a right for all other residents of the country.
              It is surprising that the beginning even reached the NOD androids. Maybe soon they will start to guess that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is not controlled by the IMF at all, and they have simply lied to them all this time?
          4. AK1972
            AK1972 26 March 2020 12: 09 New
            +2
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            But, our president, V.V. Putin, has clearly stated everything for which amendments to the constitution are needed.

            For your information, the word Constitution is written with a capital letter. But in this case, you're right, Freud’s error.
        2. flicker
          flicker 27 March 2020 01: 05 New
          -2
          Life experience increased over 20 years. We see what is happening around.
          At the beginning of 90, the miners also gained experience, saw what was happening around and knocked on their helmets, the CPSU (which controlled these knocking) was removed from power. They removed the USSR, but the CPSU remained in a different guise.
          Now they have already become more experienced and are ready to knock on their helmets again. bully
      2. Malyuta
        Malyuta 26 March 2020 07: 03 New
        23
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt. If they were not, then there is nothing to add.

        And this is not an increase in the brain, but a failed internal policeman pushes people into the opposition.
        1. Sergey Olegovich
          Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 07: 33 New
          -27
          Quote: Malyuta
          failed internal police

          Normal domestic policy. If you do not want to live a human life, live a normal life, where in spite of any crises a socially protected state is being built, then I can only state the failure of your brain. Liberals will not help you. They will kill the country. Look west, there is nothing human left. One continuous sodomism.
          1. Uncle lee
            Uncle lee 26 March 2020 08: 05 New
            28
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Liberals will not help you. They will kill the country.

            But what about the statement of Putin VV that he is a liberal!
            1. Stas157
              Stas157 26 March 2020 08: 52 New
              14
              Quote: Uncle Lee
              But what about the statement of Putin VV that he is a liberal!

              Chief liberal!

              For Zaputinians, faith in an idol is akin to faith in God. There is nothing rational (it is irrational), and therefore, no arguments work.
          2. tatra
            tatra 26 March 2020 08: 38 New
            21
            Путин сам объяснил ,что для него "жить по-человечески " -для 70% российского народа -это иметь доходы в месяц в 200 долларов на уровне самых нищих африканских стран . Этим он гордится ,что создал такую Систему с кучкой богатых и богатейших , и"средним классом " -с доходами в 200 долларов ,и с 20 миллионами нищих .
          3. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 54 New
            13
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Normal domestic policy.

            Everyone has their own norm. And judging by the standard of living, in some African countries it is the same. Not ashamed?
          4. Romey
            Romey 26 March 2020 09: 31 New
            11
            Rukalitsa ... The uncle fights with the liberals, simultaneously supporting the liberal economic course of the government with both hands, where the liberal drives the liberal appointed by the president as the liberal. Putinism, however, is a killer coronovirus. Speaking of the Communist Party. But I won’t believe it. Unless from the Duma.
          5. depressant
            depressant 26 March 2020 09: 33 New
            12
            Sergey Olegovich, sodomism is not an argument in the economic and political dispute. There is no sodomism, but the people are dying.
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 26 March 2020 16: 19 New
              -7
              250000 for a country with a population of 147 million is not an indicator of extinction - in the 90s more than 150000 per month died every month than they were born and more than one and a half million abortions did.
        2. flicker
          flicker 27 March 2020 01: 15 New
          +2
          not an increase in brains, but a failed internal policeman pushes people into opposition.
          And not only domestic politics. But 80 billion (Once again: 80 billion) allocated by the USA so that grant-eaters and grant-suckers only talk about bad domestic politics. And is it not from their sanctions that our domestic policy is bad?
          On the one hand, the sanctions (which hit on our salaries) - on the other hand, 80 billion rubles to help those who will be engaged in the gastronomy.
          А потом утверждать что будущее за "умными" людьми.
      3. Svarog
        Svarog 26 March 2020 07: 14 New
        23
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt. If they were not, then there is nothing to add.

        Вот комментарий -наглядный пример сегодняшнего "патриота" ни слова по теме, но сразу облил всех, кто реально видит жизнь.. Вы хотите сказать, что автор не прав? Может уточните, с чем не согласны?
        1. Sergey Olegovich
          Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2020 07: 35 New
          -18
          Quote: Svarog
          наглядный пример сегодняшнего "патриота"

          Do you think the patriot is you? No, you are mistaken. Patriot is one who helps the homeland. And you and liberals like you, hiding under the guise of a socialist, are trying to split, divide and harm our country.
          1. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 26 March 2020 08: 00 New
            28
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Sergey Olegovich (Sergey Olegovich)

            Apparently, today the atmospheric pressure is high, if it starts to flatten so much scrapers.
            1. Romey
              Romey 26 March 2020 10: 37 New
              12
              Again, grace descended from the screens yesterday. That's inspired.
          2. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 08: 55 New
            10
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Patriot is one who helps the homeland.

            Yes, and help can manifest itself in the form of exposing enemies and traitors.
          3. depressant
            depressant 26 March 2020 09: 45 New
            11
            Sergey Olegovich, and we help the Motherland by criticizing the policy of the ruling elite. In the hope that he will change his mind. You act as if the ruling elite is a capricious child who cannot be told the unpleasant truth. And then he will fall into hysteria, hammer with his legs, wallowing on the floor, and God forbid you personally hurt you with a weighty boot of the Russian Guard and other boots of a checking and guarding brotherhood. Is that how you regard your idol Putin?
          4. Roman12345678
            Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 13 New
            +8
            Patriot is generally a diagnosis ..
            This is a disease that prevents a person from soberly looking at things and evaluating them without reference to what words indicate his place of birth and what the president’s name sounds like ..
            И тут на сайте полно примеров того, кто при слове "Путин" чисто рефлекторно начинает радостно вилять хвостом.. Просто потому, что патриот.. и значит должен и обязан..
        2. flicker
          flicker 27 March 2020 01: 37 New
          +1
          Can specify, with what do not agree?

          Yes, a lot of things, but you do not read. Well, for example:
          It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution prescribethat international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems.


          For most, not even lawyers, but for those who have at least once tried it is obvious that almost everything in court depends on the INTERPRETATION of what is written in the law, in an article, etc.
          And therefore all sorts of little things should be spelled out.
          Once again: SIGN UP!
          These are the basics of jurisprudence, and the author writes:
          It seems to many of our readers that if the Constitution states that international law does not prevail over national law, it will somehow be able to solve all the problems

          so can write those who do not understand anything there.
          This is about the legal side of the issue, if we talk about the text from the psychological side, so there is generally horror, it is simply riddled with poison.
      4. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 41 New
        21
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt.

        Do you think that from an inconspicuous director of the Dresden House of Friendship of the USSR - the GDR, under the nurturing of Sobchak in friendship with Chubais, Sechin, Kiriyenko and others, an independent state figure was formed over twenty years of public life? Or, while he was outside the walls of the Kremlin, did he have a complete worldview, an integral picture of the life of Russian society? This citizen spent more time in foreign trips and at events that have nothing to do with public service.
        Putin is not scolded today. To be honest, all this swearing on "an object similar to the Tsar Cannon" (the same size lol ) People began to doubt that it was this "fabulous" ruler who could establish CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER in a country when the constitution itself changes in mood.
      5. Stas157
        Stas157 26 March 2020 08: 37 New
        +7
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today brains increased?

        It just opened my eyes.
        1. flicker
          flicker 27 March 2020 02: 34 New
          0
          It just opened my eyes.
          What opened up? The United States transferred 80 billion rubles to support Russian NGOs (read: grant-eaters).
          Ваши глаза "видят" на что тратятся такие огромные деньги?
          А эти деньги тратятся на то, чтобы людям глаза "открывали". Хорошо когда такие бездарности как автор этой статьи глаза открывают - можно понять подвох.
          You can object that you judge what is happening in the country from the experience of your own life and no author can deceive you.
          And this is your main mistake.
          As an example: the answer is needed - the glass is half empty or half full.
          It is here that you are being manipulated: you are convinced that it is empty. And you need to change everything then the glass is inappropriately filled.
          As soon as you begin to change everything thoughtlessly, you will immediately lose not only the contents of the glass, but also the glass itself.
          At the beginning of 90, the miners also wanted to make life even better (they also thought that they could see everything well), as a result, they destroyed the country of the USSR.
          Once again: on the one hand, sanctions, on the other, 80 billion rubles of support. Geldings are not the kind of people who just scatter money.
      6. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 39 New
        10
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Do you think that those who scold Putin today have more brains? I doubt.

        Как то прочитал что сплетня это способ социальной защиты общества. По моему разумению, дискуссии на сайте, это такой же способ обмена информацией и мыслями обогащающий мозги. Люди вырабатывают понятия, оттачивают язык, и надо признать иногда меняют точку зрения. Сейчас у людей проблема не с мозгами а с временем, информации очень много, она подается в таком виде что ее трудно систематизировать. Скажу лишь, что сегодня ругают Путина почти все! даже те для кого он раньше был кумиром. Ибо он показал на чьей он стороне. Он умеет выглядеть "хорошим" предлагая поправки лишающие депутатов недвижимости за бугром, но он знал! что они это обойдут!
        In addition, his game of questions revealed that he does not give the opportunity to conduct a dialogue. This tricky system allows you to answer the question without being interested in whether the answer is satisfactory.
        1. flicker
          flicker 27 March 2020 02: 39 New
          -1
          For he showed on whose side he was.

          Do you know that in 2007 the country was one step away from the civil war?
          And thanks to whose efforts and at what costs did you have to go to avoid this war?
          1. aybolyt678
            aybolyt678 27 March 2020 09: 08 New
            0
            Quote: flicker
            And thanks to whose efforts and at what costs did you have to go to avoid this war?

            that war was initiated from overseas ... And today, 9 out of 10 Russians are unhappy with the lack of prospects in life. Where is today's effort? where are the costs? where is social justice in demand? Why is there no ban on foreign real estate in power?
      7. Roman12345678
        Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 08 New
        +8
        Those who had no brains - they still sing Putin's odes ..
        So you are right - there is nothing to add ..
      8. Varyag71
        Varyag71 26 March 2020 10: 41 New
        +3
        for you it has long been clear
    2. Campanella
      Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 22 New
      0
      So also for the Crimea.
      I never voted for him, because his texture was clear. And with the Crimea and oil prices, he got a mess.
      But it doesn’t work for a long time if there is nothing more to be presented besides the brackets and the bridge. With whom I do not speak except hatred for him there is no feeling. I already pulled everyone up with my initiatives. I don’t know who draws such ratings for him, but this is bullshit .. He disgusted ordinary people for a long time.
  4. Old partisan
    Old partisan 26 March 2020 06: 05 New
    +5
    Before you go and how to vote, you need to include the rest of the brain.
    Take the constitution of 1993 and the draft 2020 and stupidly not really arguing COMPARE.
    Only then reason.
    You need to think with your head and not ....
    1. Ravil_Asnafovich
      Ravil_Asnafovich 26 March 2020 06: 44 New
      13
      I agree, one can think in another place, but why such a haste to change the law? Crimea, yes, there really were people demanding a referendum, but what is this? A game of thimbles? Or love chamomile, don’t like? Or is it time for us to try on the master’s whip on his back ??? Or maybe return to the time of Ivan the Terrible and live in house building? eternal diarrhea, and simple law-abiding people suffer.
      1. Campanella
        Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 29 New
        +2
        They are in a hurry because they know that the world crisis, that the coronavirus, that the deadline, that they privatized the country by a gangster method, that they will have to answer, that the loot and property will have to be returned and that they will be planted ... Therefore, they are preparing in advance. Frightening, on the one hand, the revolution, and on the other, absolutizing its power. After all, the people have long been no longer a bearer of power, he is a slave to these gentlemen!
    2. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 27 New
      20
      Quote: Old partisan
      Take the constitution of 1993 and the draft 2020 and stupidly not really arguing COMPARE.

      And why compare these “guarantee obligations” in which (1993) all public property was transferred to private ownership and in which rights were guaranteed only to a certain circle of people and (2020), in which such a situation is fixed for life.
      The country does not just do not fulfill these “warranty obligations”, but changes them during the warranty period.
      The "brightest" side of these opuses is the reduction in the population in a natural way and with "guaranteed" methods.
      1. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 39 New
        17
        Quote: ROSS 42
        The "brightest" side of these opuses is the reduction in the population in a natural way and with "guaranteed" methods.

        This is precisely how the population decreases in an unnatural way, because the death of a person who does not live to be 60 years old is itself unnatural. And the authorities have created plenty of conditions for high mortality.
    3. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 40 New
      +6
      the question is - what is the best way to vote and vote against or not to go at all ???
      1. Gene84
        Gene84 26 March 2020 14: 16 New
        +9
        be or not be replaced by a vote, we get:
        Vote or not Vote?
        That is the question? What's better?
        Whether to bear from the frantic fate
        Blows of arrows and stones - or boldly
        Arm yourself against a sea of ​​evil
      2. Campanella
        Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 36 New
        +2
        I think you should not go. Arriving at the polls, we create an informational picture of involvement with the amendments, and they will definitely say that the president’s initiatives have caused unprecedented enthusiasm of the people, etc. etc.
        True, they are insured, the cameras will not work at election commissions, and they also allowed electronic voting, without any testing or other procedures (in any case, I did not hear)
  5. avia12005
    avia12005 26 March 2020 06: 12 New
    13
    In the end, it all depends on who and how implements the norms of the Constitution and laws. And with this, more precisely, with responsibility, moreover, criminal responsibility, for their failure to fulfill a great deal of tension. More precisely, this responsibility is almost nonexistent. So it can be written in the Constitution that every Russian citizen is an oligarch. Nothing will change from this until the perpetrators begin to be sent to observe the population of polar bears for non-compliance.
    1. Sling cutter
      Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 59 New
      15
      Quote: avia12005
      Nothing will change from this until the perpetrators begin to be sent to observe the population of polar bears for non-compliance.

      And you, a colleague, a humanist, you need to smear everyone’s forehead with greens, and you want to send them to the immaculate land of beauty. This is not humanly, not fastidious.
      1. avia12005
        avia12005 26 March 2020 11: 16 New
        0
        Let's not repeat the 37th ...
        1. Whirlwind
          Whirlwind 26 March 2020 14: 16 New
          +4
          Quote: avia12005
          Let's not repeat the 37th ...

          Then let us repeat the 41st ...
          1. avia12005
            avia12005 26 March 2020 15: 49 New
            +6
            That's for sure. It is easy to imagine how the oligarchy will behave in such a situation.
        2. Campanella
          Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 41 New
          0
          I'm afraid no one can do it ...
          The revolution is the result of accumulated errors. And we have a jamb on a jamb and a jamb drives. Having rich historical experience, mankind is stepping on a rake with enviable constancy. Human passions and vices, I think they lead. After all, Putin is not ... but acting ...
  6. codetalker
    codetalker 26 March 2020 06: 28 New
    -16
    To talk about public administration, you need at least a little understanding of the issue. And the commentators were to blame for the author ... Not a single topic was worked out, not a single amendment. Why are you writing this?
  7. Ravil_Asnafovich
    Ravil_Asnafovich 26 March 2020 06: 32 New
    -25
    Roman, I'm sorry, but you have a fat minus, it is useless to pour from empty to empty.
    1. Campanella
      Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 45 New
      +1
      What minus then can Putin put in power? They have been pouring over 20 years from empty to empty. And nothing has changed .
  8. horror
    horror 26 March 2020 06: 36 New
    20
    If you are going to change the Constitution, it means it prevents them from achieving certain goals in this form. Of course, later it will become clear what kind of wholeness, but it will be too late to think or reason.
    1. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 19 New
      23
      Quote: horror
      Of course, later it will become clear what kind of integrity

      They have one goal:
      ensuring eternal government in which there will be no return to the past, no revision of privatization, and when:
      Article 9
      1. Land and other natural resources are used and protected in the Russian Federation as the basis of the life and activities of the peoples living in the relevant territory.
      2. Land and other natural resources may be in privatestate, municipal and other forms of ownership.
      1. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 43 New
        +3
        that is, you need to vote against the amendments ??? then there is hope for a second vote with an expanded set of socialist buns ???
        1. Campanella
          Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 47 New
          +1
          Useless. The elections are not transparent, the results do not allow checking and quickly destroy.
  9. mark2
    mark2 26 March 2020 06: 41 New
    +7
    C'mon, get your minds off early in the morning. There will be no vote. Putin said yesterday about an indefinite period. And during this time, thought and justification will come to do without a referendum.
    That's all.
    1. Sling cutter
      Sling cutter 26 March 2020 07: 36 New
      16
      Quote: mark2
      mark2 (Alexander)


      Most likely, against the backdrop of an impending epidemic, they will try to talk about the amended topic, especially since the amendments are actually adopted, and in order to take care of the lives of the population they can go for the introduction of emergency situations, and there
      everything will be after the fact.
      1. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 26 March 2020 08: 49 New
        +4
        Quote: Stroporez
        Most likely against the backdrop of an impending epidemic

        there will be no epidemic .. real. As a specialist, I’ll tell you that in Italy every dead person is tested for antibodies to coronavirus. And in nature, there is a wild variant of the human coronavirus that every inhabitant of the Earth has been ill with. The test system gives a false positive result of 11%. and this exactly matches the number of dead hi Elderly people die more often due to a decrease in the amount of interferon in their tissues. Interferon is in pharmacies. Reckless press!
      2. Romey
        Romey 26 March 2020 09: 39 New
        +5
        Valera, welcome! Duc, Ellochka already transparently hinted at it. It seems to me that our discussions for a boycott are simply about nothing because this senseless and merciless vote is first postponed and then canceled. And, that everything is logical, because old K signed the document. That means a mustache.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 26 March 2020 07: 37 New
      13
      А какой смысл в этом народном голосовании, только деньги на ветер. Конституция та же - буржуйская, и хозяева не меняются. Но после голосования она будет уже называться "путинская легитимная". А это ни хорошо и не плохо. Зато появиться новый исторический термин. Оттого, что сделали автомобилю тюнинг он не становится другой маркой.
    3. Campanella
      Campanella 27 March 2020 23: 48 New
      0
      Well no. Falsification is more profitable than just sending people.
  10. Darter88
    Darter88 26 March 2020 06: 50 New
    17
    Auto RU!!! I subscribe to each of your words !!! Only full nationalization and castration around the neck of oligarchs and corrupt government officials will save the Russian Federation and its people from slow extinction !!!
  11. vit670
    vit670 26 March 2020 06: 59 New
    10
    Roman is one hundred percent right! In an authoritarian state, the ruler does EVERYTHING that he wants and spits on all laws and constitutions. Only some spit undercover, while others spit openly. That’s the whole difference, no matter who covers itself!
  12. Thrifty
    Thrifty 26 March 2020 07: 05 New
    10
    Roman, you can make a wagon of changes to the constitution, but so far it remains only text on paper! It is not even carried out by authorities at all levels, what can we say about the population! And, as regards changes, they are needed. Although, ideally, the country actually needs a completely new constitution, written so that it protects the interests of the population and the Russian state itself.
    1. parusnik
      parusnik 26 March 2020 07: 25 New
      10
      ideally, the country actually needs a completely new constitution, written so that it protects the interests of the population and the Russian state itself.
      ... Absolutely. And now there are opportunities for a real nationwide discussion and elaboration of articles and regulations. The Internet ... In our case, according to the Constitution, people like governing the country ... smile
  13. yuliatreb
    yuliatreb 26 March 2020 07: 12 New
    +6
    Roman, the question here is different, did it really take twenty years to realize that it is necessary to amend the Constitution of the Russian Federation, why it was not done 15 years ago, and for this period of time, sane citizens do not need to explain why this is all done. And the extreme appearance of GDP on television confirms this, measures are being taken not so much taking care of the country's population, as they are aimed at improving the rating of GDP.
  14. parusnik
    parusnik 26 March 2020 07: 14 New
    12
    Horseradish, radish is not sweeter. The EBN and its entourage wrote the first Constitution for themselves. Approved? Approved ... The receiver (which was appointed by the EBN) and its environment are being remade for themselves. What is the difference? On the prevalence of Russian legislation. Explain, for example, how the Code of Merchant Shipping of the Russian Federation will prevail over international treaties and agreements in this area? Or TC, where some provisions are also registered on the basis of international agreements? ... Enthusiasm: everything is liberal to Kapets, as soon as the amendments are adopted. Yeah, but liberal laws, before that liberals also accepted and approved the liberal identity? laughing
  15. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 07: 14 New
    15
    Thank you, Roman!
    Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.

    I would put it a little differently:
    THE FUTURE IS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT SMART PEOPLE!
    That is the whole point of publication, that is how the thoughts of the article are built. You just remarked remarkably that while simpletons choose power, they should be fraudulent. And here, as has been successfully noted, dual citizenship or some other legal quotes are not a hindrance. Because always the “eternally fabulous guarantor” has a “lured manual” State Duma, at hand of dubious quality and significance are the “members” and “circles” of the Federation Council, the opposition and the creative intelligentsia trained and raised on budgetary allocations:

    She will explain everything, she will tell everything with high artistry and expression of facial expressions, BUT !!! she’s not going to live by these rules at all.
    We can do without high-paid jumps, armored trains, steam locomotives, and saviors of the fatherland from crazy maniacs on the stage and screen. And, as practice has shown, we absolutely cannot imagine life without everyday things and everyday goods.
    Therefore, in the future we can simply ignore the hypocrites and hypocrites, giving them their proper place in the booths, and not behind the chairs and stands of the parliament.
    1. parusnik
      parusnik 26 March 2020 07: 18 New
      18
      hi Movie from the series: Vote or lose? Part two... laughing
      1. Freeman
        Freeman 26 March 2020 10: 10 New
        +6
        Quote: parusnik
        hi Movie from the series: Vote or lose? Part two... laughing

        Rather, the continuation of the series: Vote with your heart.
        А вот голову "включать", не надо - а то вдруг поймёте, что "рекламируемые" поправки, лишь "пустой звук" и "красивые слова".
        On the main amendments, such as: state council; federal territories; redistribution of powers between branches of government - they do not remove videos.
      2. balunn
        balunn 26 March 2020 10: 36 New
        +4
        we hang for a humane attitude to animals, the 2020 Constitution laughing
        Marketers see they write what comes to mind.
        Here's more:
        For decent medicine. Constitution 2020
    2. Was mammoth
      Was mammoth 26 March 2020 08: 06 New
      14
      Quote: ROSS 42
      Thank you, Roman!
      Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.
      I would put it a little differently:
      THE FUTURE IS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT SMART PEOPLE!

      Как в "бородатом" анекдоте: "... что тут думать, трясти надо!"
      Надо думать и идти и голосовать. Даже ,если "думаешь", то толку от этого не будет, если и руководитель ЦИК называет всего лишь наблюдателей не от власти " стеревятниками и провокаторами" .
      Quote: Sergey Olegovich
      Now this is the situation when the people of our Great Country need to unite and jointly support decisions on the transformation of Russia and its well-being for the sake of us and our descendants.

      Растет благосостояние граждан страны! Как и количество миллиардеров, как и процент "среднего" класса! Уже шкалит за 70%! "Еще немного, еще чуть-чуть" и не будет бедняков в в стране Ура!wink
  16. Lynx33
    Lynx33 26 March 2020 07: 34 New
    10
    I absolutely agree with the author. Specially, for the seed, so that more people would be tempted to vote, proposed changes that would really be nice to write in the constitution. But! But free cheese only happens in a mousetrap, the only reason why the authorities so want to change the constitution is because it, in the current version, simply prevents them from permanently consolidating the current thieves' power. Therefore, I personally will vote against, no matter how seductive the bait sounds. Which I advise you all.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 26 March 2020 13: 48 New
      -7
      Do not worry, you will not lose anything from these new amendments, just like me.
  17. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  18. rocket757
    rocket757 26 March 2020 07: 44 New
    +8
    Written and written. In fact, useless campaigns around the bush ... not to convince, not to force, a significant part of the country's population, that only our unity is strong!
    So ask someone, he is against the law forbidding the leaders and their assistants to steal, take their wealth out over the hill, arrange cozy nests there and practically betray the state for which he is entrusted to serve ???
    After all, no one will say now that this is not necessary, they say they are managing so well and for the good of the country !!!
    It seems that it was even proposed to limit / chop off the possibility of such ... AND WHERE IS THIS AMENDMENT \ ARTICLE \ LAW ??? Netuti and NOBODY were particularly indignant, did not intend to do just that with the slogan!
    Well, and for many other amendments ... a lot of noise, the output is zilch!
    Нет единства, нет единой воли граждан нет .... а те, которые, "слуги народа", о себе позаботятся, НЕ СОМНЕВАЙТЕСЬ. Они в таких вопросах очень даже вместе
    Bound by one chain bound by one goal bound by one chain bound by one.
    Here the joints are sluggish, and the spaces are huge,
    Here the compositions were crumpled to make columns.
    Some words for kitchens, others for streets,
    Here eagles are dropped for broiler chickens.
  19. Boris55
    Boris55 26 March 2020 07: 59 New
    -18
    Quote: R. Skomorokhov
    Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.

    Constitutional Amendment Law Already Adopted. (March 14, 2020: 13) Changes that do not contradict the current Constitution have already entered into force. The only question is when exactly will they enter into force in full - immediately, after the announcement of positive voting results or in the event of a negative vote, after the change of the Duma, after 1.5 years or 4 years after the presidential.

    Quote from the adopted Law:
    "...If based on the results of the all-Russian vote, amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation will support more than half citizens who will take part in it, the changes provided for by the Law on Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in chapters 3–8 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, will come into force..." имеется в виду, что вступит в силу немедленно. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/news/62988

    The federal law was approved by the State Duma and the Federation Council on March 11, 2020, approved as of March 14, 2020 by the legislative (representative) bodies of 85 constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
    1. Boris55
      Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 09 New
      -12
      You can put at least a thousand minuses in your malice, but the people will vote for amendments and the social orientation of our state will be strengthened. I can argue with anyone that this will be so.

      ps
      The social system cannot be changed by laws and decrees, but it is quite possible to improve the lives of those living today, which Putin is doing. Stumble on lace panties.
      1. AUL
        AUL 26 March 2020 11: 10 New
        13
        Quote: Boris55
        You can put at least a thousand minuses in your malice, but people will vote for amendments

        A little correction - not the people, but the CEC! And no one authorized you to sign for the people. As, however, and me.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 26 March 2020 13: 50 New
          -4
          And the people in the mass are motley and have different opinions - so speak on behalf of everyone is not worth it speak for yourself.
  20. Konstantin Shevchenko
    Konstantin Shevchenko 26 March 2020 08: 06 New
    +4
    Well now it’s necessary to list why amendments to the constitution cannot be accepted and which amendments are terrible. Or is it easier why not vote for constitutional amendments? Briefly and clearly.
    The next president will abide by the constitution or the people will become rich on the constitution, this is another topic, you can send psychics to the battle.
    Is the US Constitution the ultimate truth?
    My opinion. Well-being of the USA is provided not by the constitution, but by seasoned capitalism and the US army. But this does not mean that the Russian Federation should copy. Those who copy usually hang in the tail.
  21. Alexander X
    Alexander X 26 March 2020 08: 06 New
    -18
    The new constitution is one of the positive steps for building a state of law. And the author’s agitation against making amendments is wrecking ... To say that everything is bad in Russia, so don’t vote for introducing the necessary articles into the constitution, is the author’s attempt to substitute some concepts for others to harm Russia .. By the way, except for the extension of the term of the presidency , no ideas were put forward by the author.
    1. Roman12345678
      Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 24 New
      +6
      To say that everything in Russia is bad

      The author just does not say that everything is bad, but parses each item separately and on the shelves ..
      От того и нечего "патриотам" возразить, кроме лозунгов "Всё позитивно, а автор вредитель"
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 26 March 2020 13: 52 New
        -4
        Of all the other articles of this author, one conclusion is that everything is bad for the author and he emphasizes this in most of his articles.
        1. Roman12345678
          Roman12345678 26 March 2020 14: 44 New
          +4
          the conclusion is that everything is bad for the author and he emphasizes this in most of his articles.

          Maybe we read different articles .. I have never seen the author at least once write about himself somewhere, and how things are going at all ..
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 26 March 2020 16: 21 New
            -1
            For the Author - in the country as a whole, everything is bad.
  22. Loess
    Loess 26 March 2020 08: 12 New
    -13
    After reviewing a part of the (small) comments from readers in an article about the “amendments” to the Constitution, I decided to continue the topic.

    So, about the alienation of territories. A very important point?

    Yes, I'm about September 5, 2010
    If I am not mistaken, the demarcation of the border is completed. The question is closed. So what does the new amendment have to do with it?
    The reader has piled together international law and international financial institutions.
    And therefore, instead of explaining what this amendment means, there is an appeal to what happened and is happening again BEFORE the adoption of the amendment.
    Without going into details that 97% of the Constitution is dedicated to the fact that a handful of politicians and oligarchs will rule almost forever
    Вообще-то как раз ради "подробностей" люди такие статьи и читают.
    In general, it turned out some kind of one-sided squabble with commentators ... It is precisely on the amendments to the article, by and large, not a word has been said.
    1. Boris55
      Boris55 26 March 2020 08: 25 New
      -12
      Quote: Less
      If I am not mistaken, the demarcation of the border is completed. The question is closed.

      We have not ratified the Shevardnadze-Baker line, but now we are not ratifying it.

      1. New Year day
        New Year day 26 March 2020 09: 21 New
        14
        Quote: Boris55
        We have not ratified the Shevardnadze-Baker line, but now we are not ratifying it.

        America is neither cold nor hot. She enjoys
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 22 New
          -10
          Quote: Silvestr
          America is neither cold nor hot. She enjoys

          Nothing lasts forever in this World except Russia.
          By the way, Ukraine still considers Crimea its own.
          1. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 09: 30 New
            +7
            Quote: Boris55
            Ukraine still considers Crimea its own.

            Ukraine still considers itself Ukraine! bully
            1. Boris55
              Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 39 New
              -15
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Ukraine still considers itself Ukraine!

              Not everyone there thinks so. Who gets Romanian passports, who is Russian, who is something Polish there.
          2. New Year day
            New Year day 26 March 2020 23: 12 New
            +7
            Quote: Boris55
            Nothing lasts forever in this World except Russia.

            You are mistaken, the Papuans are eternal!
  23. GRIGORIY76
    GRIGORIY76 26 March 2020 08: 18 New
    +7
    Роман, спасибо за статью, подпишусь под каждым словом, сам думаю так же. Кстати отличный лозунг "будущее за умными людьми!".
  24. savage1976
    savage1976 26 March 2020 08: 37 New
    -2
    Как забавно читать "патриотов" пару статей назад кричавшиз о необходимости введения прогрессивной шкалы налогообложения и сегодня орущиз "а нас то за что" при введении налога на депозит свыше миллиона рублей.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 26 March 2020 08: 51 New
      +8
      Quote: savage1976
      deposit tax over one million rubles.

      tax on interest (profit) that the deposit brings. There is a difference.
      Although specifically THAT I do not care, this is not, so they will take it from another, they will not miss!
      1. Boris55
        Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 03 New
        -12
        Quote: rocket757
        There is a difference.

        There is. Previously, it was not, but now it will be. The proceeds will go to the benefit of citizens, including yours, your children. Putin strengthens the social component of our state - that’s good. Who is against this is not difficult to guess.

        If we increase, then they will definitely decrease - the law of conservation. laughing
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 26 March 2020 09: 24 New
          +6
          Quote: Boris55
          conservation law.

          conservation law ... yes not a question!
          If there is trust in those who are called upon to protect and EXECUTE these laws!
          I have confidence in the authorities not ah ..... that's all.
          Посмотрим короче. По делам и "серьги" будем "развешивать".
          Now - the measures that the government is taking are logical, justified, NEEDED! questions, especially cries about, should not be, let's look at the results.
          1. Boris55
            Boris55 26 March 2020 09: 26 New
            -13
            Quote: rocket757
            Now - the measures taken by the government are logical

            Всё познаётся в сравнении. Совсем недавно один член правительства говорил: "Денег нет, но вы держитесь". Вот такая вот роль личности в истории...
            1. savage1976
              savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 33 New
              0
              Ну так вполне возможно, что тогда "денег нет" сейчас реально поможет в тяжёлой ситуации, когда ониреально нужны, но их могло не быть. От слова совсем.
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 26 March 2020 09: 48 New
                +2
                Quote: savage1976
                but they might not have been. From the word at all.

                you can argue about this ... try to convince many that it was necessary and cannot be done differently ... at the beginning of the Forbes list, place the rest that is clearly known and known ... and then try to convince someone.
                1. savage1976
                  savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 56 New
                  0
                  Man, this is such a creature that can argue about anything, even that the earth is round.
            2. rocket757
              rocket757 26 March 2020 09: 43 New
              +3
              Quote: Boris55
              "Денег нет, но вы держитесь". Вот такая вот роль личности в истории...

              of course it tried to be noted, but somehow ... hardly anyone will remember a good one.
      2. savage1976
        savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 20 New
        +1
        It was too lazy to write for a long time.
    2. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 26 March 2020 09: 00 New
      +8
      Quote: savage1976
      with the introduction of a tax on deposits of more than a million rubles.

      Oh, tell me the logic of this tax? Explain its progressiveness? Those people who managed to save several million for old age (in our country there are highly paid specialists) are required to pay tax for what? For the fact that the bank instead of the prescribed 10% pays 4%? Yes, these millions are kept by those who do not have foreign accounts ... Then, let's tax the bank spread from currency speculation ... Actually, no one was particularly upset, because for a long time he knew that there was nothing good from Putin or his government You will not get it. Let him make fun in the end ...
      1. savage1976
        savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 12 New
        -6
        Well then, just as well, explain the difference why a person created a business that brings him millions and creates jobs, should pay more percent of his income than workers who work in the jobs created by him.?
        1. Roman12345678
          Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 29 New
          +2
          Because he has more income than workers ..
          And just the workers do the bulk of the work ..
          And a person, even if he created this business, is making his income through other people's labor ..
          Почему "рабочие места" предлагаются за нищенскую ЗП.. в сравнении с теми же доходами, что приносит данный бизнес..
          1. savage1976
            savage1976 26 March 2020 10: 47 New
            +2
            Тогда какие притензии к налогу на доход по депозит свыше миллиона, доход по нему делают тоже люди, а хозяин депозита на спине диван носит. И вы плохо ознакомились дискуссией. У меня вопросов по налогам на доходы нет, они у "патриотов" которые вчера были за прогрессивка, а сегодня "а нас то за что" при читают.
            1. Roman12345678
              Roman12345678 26 March 2020 11: 01 New
              0
              I didn’t write anything about the claims, but I didn’t answer certain questions regarding the distribution of income between people ..
              Given that most of our workers cannot afford to have a free million close to me ... I would go even further, and would bring in an even higher percentage of more than 5 million .. For, all the same, such millions were earned not by sweat and blood, as a rule ..
            2. Stirbjorn
              Stirbjorn 26 March 2020 11: 51 New
              +5
              Quote: savage1976
              Then what are the claims for tax on income on a deposit of more than a million, people also make income on it, and the owner of a deposit carries a sofa on his back.

              because a million, right now it's just about nothing. If a person wants to save up for a car-apartment, and not take an imposed loan, then it must be ripped off ?! A pensioner who works, and postpones his retirement for a funeral, and for a rainy day, for the same medicines, is now becoming the object of hunting for tax officials ?! It would make sense if they invested at least 5 million. As well as with a progressive tax - it must be introduced for incomes from 100 thousand minimum
              1. savage1976
                savage1976 26 March 2020 12: 35 New
                -2
                And that means a pensioner who sold an apartment for 5 million can already be peeled off like sticky and it doesn’t matter what he needs for medicine. . Or a person who saves on a car for 5 million 10 years. As I already wrote, every progressive fighter wants to start at a level that exceeds his income, and if he is subject to tax, then this is of course the bloody regime that he personally robs.
                1. Roman12345678
                  Roman12345678 26 March 2020 13: 27 New
                  +5
                  a pensioner who sold an apartment for 5 million can already be peeled off like sticky and it doesn’t matter what he needs for medicine.

                  5 million for drugs ?? Lying in a bank on deposit ??
                  Get involved ..))

                  Or a person who saves on a car for 5 million 10 years.
                  Show me one .. at least one ..
                  You won’t even save up on Kia Rio if you save 10 years .. For 5 years ago it cost TWO times cheaper than today ..
                  Well, those who buy cars for 5 million .. believe me - they certainly do not save up on them .. even more so, for 10 years ..
                  Well, if you want to give examples, then at least come up with real ones ..
                  But in reality there will not be many of them .. for, I repeat, hard workers do not have millions on their accounts now .. Otherwise, the country would not have been completely in mortgages and loans !!
                  1. savage1976
                    savage1976 26 March 2020 14: 29 New
                    -2
                    As you read Vaud, everyone works purely for a mole, and the last cucumber is eaten up without salt, but as a tax on income from deposits per million, the poor and the unfortunate are robbed. Well, pensioners live with us, save millions with their pensions for funerals, and on Poor there are meager pensions. You would have already decided, pensioners and salaries are small or a million penny. Those with 1 million will divide it into 2 accounts in different banks and will not steam. In reality, those who do not have enough banks to keep a million will fall under the tax. But the fighters for the progressive tax lit up well.
                    1. Roman12345678
                      Roman12345678 26 March 2020 14: 48 New
                      +3
                      As you read Vaud, everyone works purely for the mole, and the last cucumber is eaten up without salt, and as a tax on income from deposits per million, the poor and the unfortunate are robbed.
                      Это опять какое-то "собрание сочинений обо всех и ни о чём"..
                      At the same time, you did not answer any of my SPECIFIC questions ..

                      You would have already decided, pensioners and salaries are small or a million penny.
                      I’m quite certain - the first option ..
                      What I have already written about ..
                      1. savage1976
                        savage1976 26 March 2020 15: 00 New
                        -2
                        So if pensioners and hard workers do not have millions in the account, why cry that they are robbed? It is a reasonable step aimed at raising taxes from wealthy people and not affecting the poor. In fact, there is no difference in whether a person bought an apartment and renting it pays taxes or put money in a bank, receives income and pays taxes from him.
                      2. savage1976
                        savage1976 26 March 2020 15: 07 New
                        0
                        And about 5 million rubles of medicine, so use Google and find out that there are medicines and much more expensive. And the pensioner can wish for himself a coffin for 5 million, his right and for 50 can. Let us consider them poor. And you can save up to 5 and 10 years on many things, not only on Kia Rio. And those who save up for Kia Rio do not get tax. So this is your inferior examples and questions.
                      3. Roman12345678
                        Roman12345678 26 March 2020 15: 40 New
                        +4
                        And about 5 million rubles of medicine, so use Google and find out that there are medicines and much more expensive.

                        Of course .. it is those pensioners that we are talking about here, and they buy from them 14 medicines for 5 million each ..))
                        I say - take off ..
                        If Pugacheva buys such medicines for 5 lyam, then she doesn’t have to equal her pensioners .. And she doesn’t sell an apartment for this, as you wrote yourself ..
                        And if he sells, then he does not put it in the bank for interest ..
                        Well, if you want to give examples, then at least come up with real ones ..

                        And the pensioner can wish for himself a coffin for 5 million, his right and for 50 can. Let us consider them poor.
                        Everything is mixed up .. people, horses ..))
                        Are you talking to yourself? Why this post ??)

                        And you can save up to 5 and 10 years on many things, not only on Kia Rio.
                        You can ... just don’t accumulate anyway ..)) Why - I already wrote above .. For 5 years, Rio has grown in price by 2 times .. Now it’s still growing ..

                        And those who save up for Kia Rio do not get tax.

                        Well, you finally understood what I wrote 5 times - we don’t have people with millions in bank accounts .. The country is poor, people are all in debt and credit ..
                        And you tell me all the tales about some pensioners who have 5 million each in a deposit for medicines ..))
                      4. savage1976
                        savage1976 26 March 2020 15: 42 New
                        -1
                        So then why cry, why the poor are robbed?
  25. savage1976
    savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 26 New
    +4
    The spread according to the Tax Code is taxed and the citizen is obliged to file a tax return and pay the tax. But alas, in our country the severity of laws is not necessarily compensated by the network of their implementation. But op is already fun.
  26. _Sergei_
    _Sergei_ 26 March 2020 10: 15 New
    0
    A person who has accumulated several million and receives a percentage of more than a million from his accumulations, did he accumulate a hard worker for old age? The tax will be taken from interest if they exceed a million.
    1. AUL
      AUL 26 March 2020 11: 24 New
      +4
      Quote: _Sergey_
      accumulated several million and receives a percentage of more than a million from his savings, is it for old age accumulated a hard worker?

      Sergey, would you not be dishonored ... First read about it, and only then speak. If that - I have on my card only the remnants of the pension from the bounty of the FIU.
    2. Lekz
      Lekz 31 March 2020 16: 39 New
      +1
      Temper righteous anger. The tax will not be taken from pensioners and interest amounts not exceeding 60 thousand.
  27. Vadim237
    Vadim237 26 March 2020 16: 33 New
    -1
    Quickly you change your shoes - just recently for a progressive tax, and now for everyone who holds more than a million in banks on deposits you keep a fence - this is bad, theft, deceit, and yes you probably forgot or are not aware that wealthy people can keep such accounts even To Russia and abroad - at the same time, pensioners, self-employed engineers and everyone else can earn millions of rubles over time, simply playing on the world stock exchange through a mobile phone. And deposits are far from all the services that customers of banks use.
  28. Tatyana Pershina
    Tatyana Pershina 26 March 2020 17: 03 New
    +2
    Listen and read carefully. The tax is not on deposit, but on the percentage on the deposit paid by the bank. That is, you will receive not 4% per annum of your deposit, but 3,48%. Your main contribution will not be affected.
  • Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 09: 01 New
    +8
    Quote: savage1976
    и сегодня орущиз "а нас то за что" при введении налога на депозит свыше миллиона рублей.

    Have you heard about double taxation? wink I have a minus on the map, I do not care. But true is more expensive.
    1. savage1976
      savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 16 New
      -2
      Well, well, that is, double taxation of someone is possible, but you can’t? And there is no double taxation, income is taken not from the entire amount, but from the amount of income on the deposit. A person bought a car for a million and taxes, receives income, give 13%, people put money on deposit, receive income, pay 13%. What is the difference? For each of these millions, tax has already been paid. But in the case of a taxi driver, the tax is normal, and in the case of a deposit, double taxation? And yes, they will take a tax from me.))) =
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 09: 21 New
        10
        Quote: savage1976
        but from the amount of income on the deposit.

        I know. But the bulk of the commentators see wrongly understood, hence the negative reviews. In real life, this law should have been adopted a long time ago, but globally 13% of bank interest is a penny (taking a calculator you will understand), and now the introduction of this law is more like a PR move.
        The much more needed progressive tax law. hi
        1. savage1976
          savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 24 New
          0
          Так тут от "патриотов" за эти копейки уже ор поднялся, а что будет когда реальную прогрессивка вернут? А ну да, "патриоты" хотят чтоб это было с других, а их трогать нельзя, они же "патриоты". Блин, ржу не могу. Как они это переживут.
          1. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 09: 33 New
            +4
            Quote: savage1976
            But what will happen when the real progression is returned?

            Everything will be fine. About op - as I already told you, many simply did not understand the essence. Some media have warmed up, and the media of various kinds, and not just the opposition.
            1. savage1976
              savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 36 New
              +3
              Ну, время покажет, её введут, когда время придёт и условия для этого сложатся. И моё мнение, ор будет стоять долго и все в стиле "а нас то за что".
              1. Ingvar 72
                Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 10: 02 New
                +3
                I bet that the bulk will be in favor. Only now they will not introduce it.
                1. savage1976
                  savage1976 26 March 2020 10: 06 New
                  +3
                  It’s possible to argue, everything will depend on the amounts, if the income tax is increased from 100 thousand a month, then there will be one thing, and if from a million it will be different. We already had progression in modern Russia (after the collapse of the union), it didn’t improve life very well. Because if you paid the tax as it should be l..hom. In my opinion, it would be more correct now not to raise the tax on the rich, but to abolish it from the poor, for example, who receives less than 2 moles is exempt from personal income tax.
                  1. Ingvar 72
                    Ingvar 72 26 March 2020 10: 08 New
                    +6
                    I agree. But if with a hundred pieces there will be 14%, and with a million 20%, then no one will be against. I would do with 10 lyam 30%
                    Naturally per month
                    1. Vadim237
                      Vadim237 26 March 2020 16: 40 New
                      0
                      If you introduce a progressive tax, then for companies with annual net profit of more than a billion rubles - 30 percent of the amount, several thousand such companies in Russia will be much easier to work with them than with each person individually.
  • SeregaBoss
    SeregaBoss 26 March 2020 08: 52 New
    +1
    The author, well, you discussed amendments to the law, about the ruble, citizenship, approx.
    Then you write that the oligarchs and so on write it for themselves. Where? Show me the amendment number that bothers you so much? Let's think together with our brains. Did you find a place?
    To slobber about gasoline, the ruble and citizenship have already got. Everything lives badly, they have lived up to the fact that cars in the yard do not fit.
    Yes, in the country of problems above the roof, but now the war would not have started because of oil, and those who see the power are thinking.
    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack 26 March 2020 12: 03 New
      -5
      Quote: Serge Boss
      Show me the amendment number that bothers you so much? Let's think together with our brains. Did you find a place?

      No, this style is this: the author only indicates the direction of thought that is desirable for him. Every reader thinks out the rest himself.

      Прием древний, как мир, называется "манипуляция сознанием". Азбука yes

      Details and evidence-based reasoning by this trick ... not foreseen request
      1. SeregaBoss
        SeregaBoss 26 March 2020 12: 59 New
        -1
        That's for sure. And I look at the discussion threads are developed by the same 5-6 people, do you have time to work? The liberals have only one opinion, this is their opinion and it is correct. They don’t see anything further than their nose.
        It seems like the Military Review website and the military are not few, do the military remember their sucking existence 10-15 years ago? No, forgot already. Power is not that, it's not that.
  • aglet
    aglet 26 March 2020 08: 55 New
    +1
    Роман, подпишусь под любым словом в вашей статье, но напрасно вы так. половина здешних читателей статью до конца не прочитают-"слишкам многа букоф", как они говорят, половина второй половины будет резко против- они за путина, вторая половина будет против- они против Романа. но все дружно пойдут голосовать"за", онижепатриоты, а ты раскачиваешь лодку.
    "можно силой привести лошадь к воде, но нельзя заставить её напиться",гласит народная пословица, пока все здешние читатели не поймут сами перспективы развития страны, их ничем не убедишь. но когда поймут все- уже будет поздно, будет кучка маленьких странишек, озабоченных просто добычей пищи.план бжеэинского всё ещё успешно работает,это не хпп
    1. flicker
      flicker 26 March 2020 21: 58 New
      -1
      "можно силой привести лошадь к воде, но нельзя заставить её напиться",гласит народная пословица,

      Мда, но Роман, похоже, предпочитает поговорку другого народа : "шекелей много не бывает".
      And he sees the future behind them bully
  • aglet
    aglet 26 March 2020 09: 01 New
    +1
    Quote: Sergey Olegovich
    we must unite around the leader of our country. Whenever a threat arose, our people united

    this leader shamelessly takes advantage of this so that the people, united, once again, save themselves, and at the same time
  • 1536
    1536 26 March 2020 09: 17 New
    +8
    Самое прискорбное, что мнение "умных людей" есть истина в последней инстанции. Вопрос только в том, кто определяет "умный" ты или, извините, "чудак" на букву "м" и не умеешь жить. Попасть бы в разряд "умных" и все, жизнь удалась. Вот только причем здесь Конституция с её поправками?
  • New Year day
    New Year day 26 March 2020 09: 20 New
    12
    The bulk who live in constant struggle with the terrible disease "The first channel of the brain"

    Everything is correctly written by the author. Himself defeated this ailment, ashamed as much as Solovyov listened! YES and the rest are no better. Until you turn your brains on and start to think, you will be a slave to power. What does she seek

    Think. For smart people possibly, future.

    Осталось получить ключевое качество человека "Ум" , чтобы не сработало "возможно"
    1. Roman12345678
      Roman12345678 26 March 2020 10: 34 New
      +4
      Himself defeated this ailment, ashamed as much as Solovyov listened!

      By the way, yes .. about 5 years ago, too, was a sinner ..
      What is surprising - because I liked the fact that he sings ..))
      Only then, somehow, a little one-sidedness began to notice the one-sidedness of all these programs ..
    2. SeregaBoss
      SeregaBoss 26 March 2020 13: 02 New
      -2
      Judging by your profile picture, you switched from channel 1 to TNT, and how to get smarter there.
      1. Roman12345678
        Roman12345678 26 March 2020 13: 28 New
        +2
        According to TNT, more reality can be seen than from Solovyov ..))
  • Gardamir
    Gardamir 26 March 2020 09: 35 New
    +6
    I totally agree.
    И действительно порой спорить и что-то доказывать уже не хочется. Живем ведь здесь и сейчас. Кто не успел запастись продуктами, дорожают потихоньку. Соседа сократили. И много чего "веселого" увидим в ближайший месяц. Но будут рассказывать, как все замечательно. Вчера патриоты радовались, что президент пообещал с миллиона процентов брать налог. А меня больше волнует, что все банкоматы в ближайшее время возможно перестанут выдавать наличные.
    1. New Year day
      New Year day 26 March 2020 11: 06 New
      +9
      Quote: Gardamir
      all ATMs in the near future may cease to issue cash

      There is such a Valery Solovey, so he spoke about the need to have cash and currency on hand 2 weeks ago. While all his predictions come true
      1. Altona
        Altona 26 March 2020 15: 27 New
        +9
        Quote: Silvestr
        There is such a Valery Solovey, so he spoke about the need to have cash and currency on hand 2 weeks ago. While all his predictions come true


        Мой совет в январе. Конечно же "неправильный".
        1. New Year day
          New Year day 26 March 2020 20: 23 New
          +6
          Quote: Altona
          Мой совет в январе. Конечно же "неправильный".

          correct. If there is something to change. Of course
          1. Altona
            Altona 26 March 2020 20: 27 New
            +3
            Quote: Silvestr
            correct. If there is something to change

            -------------------------
            Сильвестр, это все вещи очень рискованные и неочевидные, я имею в виду финансовые "телодвижения" с личными финансами, если вы не являетесь профессионалом, а действуете по наитию. Опять же какими суммами рисковать и как их раскладывать.
    2. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack 26 March 2020 11: 56 New
      -4
      Quote: Gardamir
      all ATMs in the near future may cease to issue cash

      1. For whatever reason?
      2. What are you not comfortable with cashless? Or them too give out, pah ... stop taking?
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 26 March 2020 12: 11 New
        +5
        First notice maybe.
        It turns out that this recommendation applies to those ATMs that accept and issue. There the virus does not have time to jump off the banknote.
        Well, sometimes you have to pay only cash.
        1. Golovan Jack
          Golovan Jack 26 March 2020 12: 23 New
          -5
          Quote: Gardamir
          this recommendation applies to those ATMs that accept and issue. There the virus does not have time to jump off the banknote

          It is a rational explanation. Paying cash on buses, for example, we canceled another week ago, and for the same reason.

          Quote: Gardamir
          First notice maybe

          Я знаю этот стиль. В случае чего - "а я ничего не говорил".

          You are incorrigible, man laughing
  • Uncle Vanya Susanin
    Uncle Vanya Susanin 26 March 2020 09: 50 New
    +2
    "Подытоживая, могу сказать следующее. Самая крутая страна в плане демократии, США..."
    I hope it was sarcasm!
  • Roman12345678
    Roman12345678 26 March 2020 09: 57 New
    0
    Another great article ..
    1. _Sergei_
      _Sergei_ 26 March 2020 10: 17 New
      -3
      Is that sarcasm too?
    2. _Sergei_
      _Sergei_ 26 March 2020 10: 21 New
      -5
      У нас в России есть такая поговорка "неумный человек такого же видит издалека"
      1. Roman12345678
        Roman12345678 26 March 2020 11: 06 New
        -2
        I doubt that people like you could give birth to the Russian land ..))
        Скорее всего, какая-то компьютерная программа.. но, поскольку часть денег, как это принято в нашей стране, благополучно распилили, то на хороших программистах пришлось сэкономить.. Отсюда и такие неумелые попытки выглядеть "умным"..
  • AleBors
    AleBors 26 March 2020 10: 04 New
    +2
    Thanks, Roman. Well written. I have already decided, for a long time I do not go to any vote.
  • aleks.29ru
    aleks.29ru 26 March 2020 10: 54 New
    +3
    Голосовать больше не буду с простой формулировкой " утратил доверие ".
    1. New Year day
      New Year day 26 March 2020 11: 08 New
      +9
      Quote: aleks.29ru
      I won’t vote anymore

      I think that there will be no vote at all. There is no sense - the law has already been adopted
  • seacap
    seacap 26 March 2020 11: 02 New
    +3
    В основном полностью согласен с автором,Все это,своего рода ширма,для плебса,этакая имитация активного псевдодемократического процесса,получите и заткнитесь,а что твориться в реалии за этой ширмой вряд ли мы скоро узнаем. Кстати,вся эта "движуха",извиняюсь за сленг,но он только и подходит для определения деятельности заслуженных авантюристов верхнего сословия. Так вот,все эти "телодвижения" с вирусом,так похоже на операцию прикрытия,масштаб и размах слишком избыточен для ничем не примечательного сезонного заболевания. Все меры изоляции под прикрытием заражения,очень уж напоминает на,как минимум, репетицию блокировки протестных,революционных настроений,блокировку массовых протестных выступлений,отсюда и неадекватные сроки заключения,за убийства меньше получают.Я обычный обыватель,не параноик,просто образование еще нормальное,советское,позволяющее логически думать,конечно же это исключительно мое мнение.
  • Avior
    Avior 26 March 2020 11: 10 New
    +4
    So, in the United States, in the event of a conflict between the rule of international law and domestic law (and especially a precedent), the judge will always be guided by the latter.

    not quite right.
    То что прецендентом- это так и есть, это преграда на пути принципа "Закон что дышло". Если в оденом случае такое решение приняли, что справедливо во всех остальных таких же случаях судить аналогично, пока закон неизменный.
    If the law has changed, another thing.
    But the fact that the United States is more important than internal laws, this is not entirely true.
    According to the US Constitution, they are completely equivalent.
    This constitution and the laws of the United States, which will be established to enforce it, as well as all treaties concluded by the United States, must be the supreme law of the country, and judges of each state must obey them, at least in the constitution and laws of individual states there are contradictions to them.

    Article VI of the US Constitution
    https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%A1%D0%A8%D0%90
  • NordUral
    NordUral 26 March 2020 11: 20 New
    +4
    I support the article! But the question remains, burning to impossibility.


    I ask all concerned to vote!
  • KSVK
    KSVK 26 March 2020 11: 25 New
    +3
    Quote: Freeman

    - "Бить шулеров канделябрами", пока не призываю.

    Or maybe it's time?
  • KSVK
    KSVK 26 March 2020 11: 47 New
    +5
    Quote: Sergey Olegovich
    Patriot is one who helps the homeland.

    Я прошу прощения, а что есть "Родина" на Ваш взгляд? Я вот повсеместно, ну вокруг себя конечно, наблюдаю что люди становятся беднее и беднее. Вот эти люди "Родина"? Я вижу по телевидению каждый день собирают деньги на операции больным детям. Они не "Родина"? Вижу как вырубаются и вывозятся за границу леса. Эти леса они к "Родине" не относятся? Реки беднеют и загрязняются. В местах добычи "чёрного золота" вообще видели что творится с экологией? Съездите, посмотрите. Увидите много интересного. Это к Вашей "Родине" не относится? Или "Родина" это Ротенберго-Дерипаско-Миллеры? Ну-у-у, тогда помогайте. Как истинный патриот. Сдаётся только мне, что вот именно этой "Родине" Ваша помощь .... ну не требуется.
  • WayKheThuo
    WayKheThuo 26 March 2020 13: 15 New
    +2
    The author is right. I especially liked the comparison of the number of articles in the Constitutions.
    И ещё. Считаю, что патриоты, упомянутые в статье, должны писаться как "патриоты".
  • cniza
    cniza 26 March 2020 13: 48 New
    +4
    Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.


    Too smart do not want to power, and the law is not written for fools, and so it turns out a vicious circle ...
  • Brigadier
    Brigadier 26 March 2020 14: 39 New
    +8
    За всей той словесной мишурой "для народа", которой набиты "поправки", абсолютно чётко прослеживается лишь одна, самая главная мысль, ради которой всё это и было задумано...

    I suppose you all understand exactly which one. laughing wink lol

  • Victor N
    Victor N 26 March 2020 14: 40 New
    -3
    Типичная позиция: "Я проблемы не вижу - значит её нет".
    Meanwhile, the mission of the researcher is to be the first to see the problem, to warn society, to outline solutions. This takes many years. And not the fact that you will gain awareness.
    But it’s worthwhile to always check yourself: maybe I don’t understand what? It happens. Very much....
  • Ravil_Asnafovich
    Ravil_Asnafovich 26 March 2020 14: 58 New
    0
    220 comments, 20 minuses to me, that is, less than 10 percent, democracy.
  • Altona
    Altona 26 March 2020 15: 15 New
    10
    Let's decide for a start - does the Constitution work for us in general?
    The right to assemble peacefully and without weapons? Already does not work in any form.
    Статья 51 "Никто не обязан свидетельствовать против себя и родственников". Не работает.
    "В РФ не должны приниматься законы умаляющие права и свободы человека и гражданина", работает? Пенсионная реформа ясно ответила. Ну и так можно пройтись по другим статьям. Обычная декларативная бумага в части прав и свобод гражданина. Но в основах государственной власти все большее стремление к закрытости власти от общества и стремление к тирании. Так что хотели "царя"? Приехали. Он давно имеется. Со своими опричниками тире гвардейцами и черносотенцами тире шизопутинцами, с новыми дворянами, с сословным обществом. Как-то так. Шизопутинцам огромный и пламенный "привет".
  • faterdom
    faterdom 26 March 2020 15: 21 New
    +9
    Novel, the question requires further development and continuation.
    Let's not worry - there-those-who-need to read everything and report to someone-need. Will it be vox populi.
    Заодно своих юноармейцев или "наших" пусть лучше инструктируют. А что стыдно видеть, как сторонники "пакета поправок" как попугаи одно и то же долбят: "Значит ты за раздачу территорий! Значит ты либерал! Значит ты против индексаций пенсий!"
    Is it me - a war veteran who has served 36 calendars for the distribution of territories? My head doesn’t work like that, I can only protect, hold or liberate territories, they simply didn’t teach me otherwise. For this, there is defense and offensive with their varieties in tactics, distribution is for politicians, I just don’t know how.
    The liberals (those whom we all have in mind) are Medvedev, Chubais, Kudrin, Gref, Nabiulina, Miller, Siluanov, and, in his own words, Putin. Why should I call these epithets and even strangers - I do not understand ...
    Про пенсии - в миллионный раз: что плохим танцорам столько лет мешает их нормально индексировать, напротив - все последние годы то заморозки, то баллы, то разовые подачки вместо индексации, и апофеоз - лишение пенсий миллионов людей чисто так, в честь футбольного чемпионата. Неужто только "плохая Конституция"? ( Что-то ты все ешь - а не толстеешь? А у меня конституция такая!)
    Так что, давайте хотя бы просто дадим понять: нас просто на "слабо" уже не облапошить, мы - ученые, мы видели "Perestroika", нам на рельсы уже президенты ложились, нам уже "пока я - Президент..." знакомо.
    It’s time to think more intelligently about the people - evolutionary selection has already weeded out the stupid ones, they have not survived, they are sick.
    1. Gost2012
      Gost2012 27 March 2020 12: 45 New
      +2
      Quote: faterdom
      .... stupid evolutionary selection has already weed out ...


      oh not all, oh how not all ...
  • KSVK
    KSVK 26 March 2020 16: 02 New
    +3
    Quote: cniza
    Think. For smart people, perhaps the future.


    Too smart do not want to power, and the law is not written for fools, and so it turns out a vicious circle ...

    For some reason I remembered:
    Who can do.
    Who can’t teach.
    Who can’t learn, manage.
  • KSVK
    KSVK 26 March 2020 16: 11 New
    +2
    Quote: faterdom

    About pensions - for the millionth time: that bad dancers have been preventing them from indexing for so many years, on the contrary - all recent years have been frozen, scored, or one-time handouts instead of indexing, and the apotheosis is that depriving millions of pensions is purely in honor of the football championship.


    And everyone has already forgotten about the accumulated stolen part. Sorry. As well as about 2% of excess VAT lost amid increasing retirement age.

    Quote: faterdom

    Так что, давайте хотя бы просто дадим понять: нас просто на "слабо" уже не облапошить, мы - ученые, мы видели "Perestroika", нам на рельсы уже президенты ложились, нам уже "пока я - Президент..." знакомо
    It’s time to think more intelligently about the people - evolutionary selection has already weeded out the stupid ones, they have not survived, they are sick.


    Specific suggestions?

    PS And in the meantime, the guardsmen are being pulled into the capital. Undoubtedly for the protection of the population. That's just interesting from whom?

    ZZA I'll figure out how to insert a video ....
    1. Victor N
      Victor N 27 March 2020 09: 00 New
      +3
      The PENSION FUND does not have money, and it is not part of the State budget - is it difficult to understand?
      1. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 28 March 2020 17: 58 New
        0
        it’s hard for me to understand where my money is going that I have been paying more than 25 in PF
        1. Victor N
          Victor N 29 March 2020 12: 50 New
          +1
          Если не получается "понимать", надо просто изучить вопрос - по жизни очень пригодится. И лучше это сделать лет за 10 до наступления пенсионного возраста.
  • A.TOR
    A.TOR 26 March 2020 16: 51 New
    +1
    Interesting ... people are gradually beginning to see clearly. I need to bribe popcorn
  • KSVK
    KSVK 26 March 2020 17: 09 New
    +2
    I figured it out.




    What do you think, rehearsal?

    1. depressant
      depressant 26 March 2020 22: 28 New
      +5
      About the buses with the military.
      In fact, the situation is much more complicated than many imagine. The country has 10 million migrants from Central Asia. These are young passionate men. I would not be surprised if at least 1 million of them work in Moscow and the region. All earned money, except for those that go to their own food and payment of rental housing, they send to their homeland. They have no cash reserves. And here is quarantine, many enterprises ceased operations, including construction stopped (she saw it when she was driving from the hospital), but the border is closed, migrants cannot return home, to their homeland. Given their impending lack of money, the leaders of the diasporas, preoccupied with the loss of their own power over compatriots, have already begun blackmailing our law enforcement agencies and authorities with statements about the possible criminalization of the diasporas. In particular, the leader of the Uzbek diaspora spoke about this even before March 21. Like, they will rob and kill the locals. Migrants already require financial assistance from our authorities. After all, their work is used by a huge industry. They believe in their own right. Hence the delivery of troops to Moscow by buses. I think, not only to Moscow.
      By the way, the police were on duty in my village today. All day. I had the opportunity to watch two cars from the window of my kitchen. In general, we reap what we sow. And this is only one aspect. The question is, what else do we not see?
    2. Victor N
      Victor N 29 March 2020 12: 53 New
      0
      It’s time to kick asses in Russia!