Russia is ready for serial production of the latest Sarmat ICBMs

69
Russia is ready for serial production of the latest Sarmat ICBMs

Russia is ready for serial production of the latest Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missiles. This was stated by Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu in the Federation Council.

Speaking to Russian senators, the head of the military department announced the completion of modernization of production for serial production of Sarmat ICBMs. According to Shoigu, Russia is building up its containment potential.



The minister did not say anything about the future rocket manufacturer, but previously it was reported that the Krasnoyarsk Machine-Building Plant, which in Soviet times was the leading manufacturer of missiles for submarines, would be engaged in serial production of Sarmat. Back in 2017, the Ministry of Defense announced the modernization of production in Krasnoyarsk and plans to conclude a contract with the enterprise for the production of Sarmat ICBMs.

At the end of last year, it was reported that the start of flight design tests of the Sarmat ICBM was set to 2019 year, and the end - 2021 year. In the same year, 2021, the industry will have to master the mass production of the new weapons and related systems. In addition, in 2021, the first rocket regiment armed with the Sarmatians will take up combat duty. This will be one of the regiments of the 62 th missile of the Uzhur Red Banner Division of the Strategic Missile Forces. Next, the ICBM will go into service with the Dombarovsk division of the Strategic Missile Forces.

ICBM RS-28 “Sarmat” is being prepared to replace the world's most powerful ICBM of the mine base RS-20В “Voevoda” (NATO - SS-18 “Satan”). It is possible that the rocket will become the carrier of hypersonic Avangard blocks.
69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    25 March 2020 15: 57
    Well, if it’s ready, then proceed to release.
    Why shake the air for nothing.
    And release more, more. So that the "partners" feel it.
    1. +4
      25 March 2020 19: 36
      Quote: Honest Citizen
      so start the release.

      We are talking about the readiness of production, that is, the enterprise, and the rocket itself is still being tested.
      1. 0
        25 March 2020 20: 09
        here the skewer is ready for frying meat, even a little even a teaspoon - this is already pleasant for partners
    2. 0
      25 March 2020 20: 05
      Yes, I join my compatriot: release, release more and more often - so that all our sworn "friends" will receive .... uh-uh - gifts.
      We are not greedy - enough for everyone.
    3. 0
      25 March 2020 22: 16
      More will not work due to restrictions by all kinds of contracts + the more missiles, the greater the maintenance costs. There should be a balance in everything.
  2. +17
    25 March 2020 15: 58
    Rejoice Americans!
    A replacement for Satan arrived.
    Heat and light in your home can deliver guaranteed.
    But Europeans can not worry. Bed bugs do not crush.
    1. -65
      25 March 2020 16: 01
      Quote: Victor_B
      Rejoice Americans!
      A replacement for Satan arrived.
      Heat and light in your home can deliver guaranteed.


      We rejoice together - 1 rocket - no hospital built ... 5 schools
      1. +26
        25 March 2020 16: 02
        Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
        1 rocket minus one hospital or 10 schools

        However, many times more.
        Chertok wrote that we are shooting CITIES.
        So that you can raise a degree of conviction.
        And also pensioners and pioners suffer. Strong.
        You liberals, because they are constantly suffering.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +29
        25 March 2020 16: 09
        Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
        We rejoice together - 1 rocket - no hospital built ... 5 schools

        Rejoice. 1 rocket built - this is a fundamental opportunity to build a hospital, five schools.
        "Who does not want to feed his army, will feed someone else's" (c)
        1. +7
          25 March 2020 16: 10
          Quote: Honest Citizen
          "Who does not want to feed his army, will feed someone else's" (c)

          Very, very expensive!
          1. +3
            25 March 2020 19: 42
            Quote: Victor_B
            Quote: Honest Citizen
            "Who does not want to feed his army, will feed someone else's" (c)

            Very, very expensive!

            Look, Old Europe has already felt it. New Europeans are still in rosy dreams - "America has come - put things in order" ...
        2. -30
          25 March 2020 16: 23
          Come out of suspended animation. Now "for feeding" foreign armies other means are used, mainly of an economic plan.
          1. +17
            25 March 2020 16: 33
            Quote: unaha
            Come out of suspended animation. Now "for feeding" foreign armies other means are used, mainly of an economic plan.
            You tell it in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen.
            1. -16
              25 March 2020 16: 56
              Invalid comparison. But even in these cases, in all the troubles where the United States used the sun, they receive only losses. But in all cases of using economic funds (China, Vietnam, India and the Russian Federation itself), quite tangible profit.
              1. +3
                25 March 2020 20: 41
                Quote: unaha
                But even in these cases, in all the troubles where the US used the sun, they get only a loss

                Yes, of course, losses. There gerych from Agana transported around the world by planes. Oil double bass from Syria pull
                1. 0
                  26 March 2020 09: 10
                  And where is the profit? The cost of maintaining the group is immeasurably higher. And reputational losses also did not disappear. There is little oil in Syria and not the Americans are pulling it.
          2. +1
            26 March 2020 07: 01
            other means are used to "feed" foreign armies

            Judging by the constantly shrinking, or shuffling, military budgets of some countries, including the most democratic, and the incessant whining about the lack of money, these funds are figs, and they are clearly not enough.
        3. -18
          25 March 2020 16: 57
          1 rocket built - this is a fundamental opportunity to build a hospital, five schools.

          Like without rockets schools are not built?
          1. +7
            25 March 2020 19: 46
            Quote: 25486
            1 rocket built - this is a fundamental opportunity to build a hospital, five schools.

            Like without rockets schools are not built?

            Schools are built due to the fact that there are rockets.
            And, thanks to the presence of rockets, teachers in those schools can tell children who actually defeated Germany in 1945.

            Enough, in the 90s we’ve already lived without missiles - we still cannot disentangle ...
        4. +12
          25 March 2020 19: 39
          Quote: Honest Citizen
          Rejoice. 1 rocket built - this is a fundamental opportunity to build a hospital, five schools.

          In the 90s, to the delight of America, they cut rockets along and across. Let the liberals tell me - then many schools and hospitals were built instead of them?

          If only to vyaknut ... Why climb on VO? We would sit on "Yehu Masskva" in an embrace with Gozman and Amnuel .... There they have their own, there they will be understood.
      4. +12
        25 March 2020 16: 38
        Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
        Quote: Victor_B
        Rejoice Americans!
        A replacement for Satan arrived.
        Heat and light in your home can deliver guaranteed.


        We rejoice together - 1 rocket - no hospital built ... 5 schools

        From the fact that neither the hospital nor 5 schools will build a rocket.
      5. +14
        25 March 2020 16: 54
        Tell this to Libya, Yugoslavia and Iraq, they had schools and hospitals, but there were no "Satan", "Iskander" and "Borey"!
        1. -27
          25 March 2020 16: 58
          "Satan", "Iskander" and "Borey" were not there!

          99% of the countries of the world do not have Satan, Iskanders and Boreas. But this does not prevent many of them from living normally.
          1. +13
            25 March 2020 17: 02
            No need to compare your finger with the booty! These countries without "Boreyev" and "Iskander" who live fucking don't need anyone! And also the "owner" will not allow them to have it all.
          2. +14
            25 March 2020 17: 18
            Quote: 25486

            99% of the countries of the world do not have Satan, Iskanders and Boreas. But this does not prevent many of them from living normally.

            It is necessary to add - while it does not interfere. But suddenly the most democratic will turn his attention to them and decide that they do not have such a democracy. And then what? Suggest? Or do you remember Yugoslavia? And so forth
          3. +2
            25 March 2020 17: 36
            Excuse me, are you a Ukrainian or something, from Italy, a fugitive social worker?
            The slave mentality is felt
          4. +16
            25 March 2020 18: 12
            Quote: 25486
            99% of the countries of the world do not have Satan, Iskanders and Boreas. But this does not prevent many of them from living normally.

            You will not be difficult to give an example. Well, one of 99% of the countries. So independent, prosperous, not lying under anyone. Without an army, all the money spent strictly on hospitals and schools. The size of a quarter of the equator ... Although okay, the size may be smaller.
            Is there such a thing in nature, or is it just children's fantasies?
      6. +15
        25 March 2020 17: 28
        Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
        We rejoice together - 1 rocket - no hospital built ... 5 schools

        Without these missiles, for a long time, INSTEAD of hospitals and schools, markets would stand, shuttles would run, and people would die like flies. Or is your memory short? Recall how it was in the 90s?
      7. +3
        25 March 2020 17: 42
        Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
        Quote: Victor_B
        Rejoice Americans!
        A replacement for Satan arrived.
        Heat and light in your home can deliver guaranteed.


        We rejoice together - 1 rocket - no hospital built ... 5 schools

        The missile has not been built - there are no previously built hospitals and schools left after another hypothetical NATO aggression, as was the case in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan. Then we will really "be glad" that the missiles were not built in due time.
      8. +8
        25 March 2020 18: 57
        In Libya, medicine was excellent, and salaries and standard of living were necessary, but she couldn’t defend herself against the Phushington occupation, now there was nothing left.
        1. +7
          25 March 2020 19: 52
          Quote: Incvizitor
          In Libya, medicine was excellent, and salaries and standard of living were necessary, but she couldn’t defend herself against the Phushington occupation, now there was nothing left.

          But because there were no rockets.

          Look, in North Korea - don’t understand what, don’t understand where and how it flies, but there is, and, theoretically, it may crash. So what? America rang bells, poked her cheeks, realized that no one was afraid of her there and quietly and peacefully dumped her. What the hell isn’t joking - what if in fact California is craving? A point, you see, America does not have iron ...
          1. +2
            26 March 2020 00: 53
            The point, apparently, is not iron in America.

            Well yes. And it’s a pity that it’s not yet torn. But it’s time. Long run up. soldier
      9. +2
        25 March 2020 20: 50
        Here is how much you got divorced ?!
        Like bed bugs ..
      10. 0
        26 March 2020 07: 04
        We rejoice together - 1 rocket - no hospital built ... 5 schools

        Do you propose destroying an entire industry, expelling thousands of highly qualified specialists for schools and hospitals?
        Pacifism is good somewhere on a desert island, where he himself is the only enemy of the only person.
    2. -1
      25 March 2020 17: 47
      Quote: Victor_B
      Rejoice Americans!
      A replacement for Satan arrived.
      Heat and light in your home can deliver guaranteed.
      But Europeans can not worry. Bed bugs do not crush.

      Well, a joke in the subject:
      A son; Dad, how much fly to Armerika?
      Father: scratching the back of his head with a pencil, well, about 10 -20 minutes, son, it’s kind of according to calculations ..
      Wife from the kitchen: Generally went nuts with his rockets, the son asks how much to fly on an airplane?
      laughing
      In general, Vanguards have already been on duty since December 2019.
      And in the usual nuclear weapons, Russia again pulled ahead. Ugh Ugh .. I hope this doesn’t come to that, but many hot goals will cool in the west and east ..
      Quote: NEXUS
      Without these missiles, for a long time, INSTEAD of hospitals and schools, markets would stand, shuttles would run, and people would die like flies. Or is your memory short? Recall how it was in the 90s?

      Some have forgotten, all this horror is bloody .. I remembered for life and do not want to repeat ..
    3. +1
      25 March 2020 22: 17
      This is not Satan, but the Governor. Enemies called Satan a rocket.
    4. +4
      26 March 2020 00: 06
      Quote: Victor_B
      A replacement for Satan arrived.

      Undoubtedly so.
      But the author made a mistake:
      The RS-28 Sarmat ICBM is being prepared to replace the world's most powerful silo-based ICBM, the RS-20V Voevoda (NATO - SS-18 Satan).
      The thing is that the RS (missile system, consisting of at least 11 elements) and ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missile - 1 product) are not the same thing. In the RS-20V was the ICBM R-36M2 (15A18M) ...
  3. +2
    25 March 2020 15: 58
    As the saying goes, good luck! If only the plans did not change, and the timing of the start of the production of missiles was not postponed to later ones!
  4. +4
    25 March 2020 15: 58
    Great news! Detractors have an extra reason to buy toilet paper! The main thing is that everything would give up on schedule ....
    1. -24
      25 March 2020 16: 01
      I think that everyone does not give a damn ..
      For no one in their right mind was going to fight with us ..
      1. -5
        25 March 2020 16: 03
        Roman, you are 100% right. But as a sobering pill, this ICBM is great ... and shows that the defense is working !!!
      2. +1
        25 March 2020 16: 11
        That's just the same mind loses health
      3. +12
        25 March 2020 16: 27
        Definitely not going to. Just explain to me, the wacky one, why has the NATO moved its military bases to our borders since the collapse of the USSR? After all, the evil Putin came much later ... then we were kind of like best friends with the Americans ??? What are reconnaissance planes doing near our borders now ??? Why are elements of an American missile defense built in Poland and the Czech Republic ??? And it was not we who started it, far from us ... Under the drunk Yeltsin, it was the NATO people who started it all.
        And the history of the European country of Yugoslavia somehow really leads to sad thoughts ...
        So let these missiles and not one be better. somehow calmer with them.
        1. -16
          25 March 2020 17: 02
          Well, for example, so that the leadership of the Russian Federation does not even have any thoughts about restoring the empire. In addition, if the "elites" of the state bring the state to the next "half-life", the process must be controlled.
          And there is no concept of "friends" in international relations ...
          However, all this does not mean that there is a desire to fight - it is very expensive and disadvantageous.
        2. -4
          26 March 2020 08: 59
          Hospadi as small children ..
          Well, at least in order to cut money from the Poles .. develop your military-industrial complex, bring in your product to everyone, and then also serve it for money ..
          There are still a lot of political issues ..
          Again - you can set all sorts of neighbors off .. kindle fire, as in Ukraine .. harm us with such trifles .. But certainly not to fire nuclear missiles with us .. do not confuse with Yugoslavia ..
          But our planes fly at their borders .. although we do not have any military bloc in North America ..
          Think at least sometimes .. otherwise you are used to reaping the minuses, like Pavlov’s dog ..))
          1. 0
            26 March 2020 09: 06
            Well, yes, yes, yes, yes ... Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria ... Question: If these countries had their own nuclear weapons, they would have suffered the same fate in terms of democratization from NATO ???
            By the way, neither the Americans nor their allies from the nuclear club are in a hurry to abandon nuclear weapons and their delivery vehicles ...

            Based on the foregoing, I can assume that you, dear and most invaluable friend, are at least a classical liberal, to say the least ...
      4. +2
        25 March 2020 17: 31
        Quote: Roman12345678
        I think that everyone does not give a damn ..
        For no one in their right mind was going to fight with us ..

        The question is not whether they are going to fight or not ... by the way, the Anglo-Saxons have been fighting with us, and not one hundred years in a row. The question is that in this war, each side is looking for a way (weapon) that would give an absolute advantage over the enemy, and allow dictating conditions from a position of strength.
        1. -3
          26 March 2020 09: 03
          The question is that in this war, each side is looking for a way (weapon),which would give an absolute advantage

          Then why are we discussing Sarmatian ..
          I repeat once again - no one will save bricks in the west of this news ..
    2. -15
      25 March 2020 17: 02
      Detractors have an extra reason to buy toilet paper!

      Well, ill-wishers at least know how to make toilet paper, and not like one great country they import 70% of toilet paper, and the rest they produce on imported equipment using foreign technical technology.
      1. MMX
        +4
        25 March 2020 17: 35
        Quote: 25486
        Detractors have an extra reason to buy toilet paper!

        Well, ill-wishers at least know how to make toilet paper, and not like one great country they import 70% of toilet paper, and the rest they produce on imported equipment using foreign technical technology.


        Data about 70%, please.
        1. -1
          25 March 2020 18: 27
          Gentlemen take the word - Here the fellow traveler Rzhevsky, and the card went;)
  5. +2
    25 March 2020 16: 02
    My man in the Pentagon, through secret communication channels, reported that the Pentagon announced a secret tender to buy just a giant batch of diapers for all personnel. There is infa that will seriously affect the diapers market and prices will go up sharply, so who needs to stock up
    1. -12
      25 March 2020 17: 04
      There is infa that will seriously affect the diapers market and prices will go up sharply, so who needs to stock up


      You wouldn’t be in a hurry to have a good sense of humor.
      1. +3
        25 March 2020 17: 06
        Where did you see the humor? Are you a protege of Petrosyan? Give me a couple of sparkling humor lessons?
      2. MMX
        +5
        25 March 2020 17: 37
        Quote: 25486
        There is infa that will seriously affect the diapers market and prices will go up sharply, so who needs to stock up


        You wouldn’t be in a hurry to have a good sense of humor.


        You see, the rocket hasn’t even entered into mass production yet, and you’re already burning ...
  6. 0
    25 March 2020 16: 10
    "Sarmat" + "Poseidon" with 100-Mt warhead = "sweet" strategic couple bully
  7. -2
    25 March 2020 16: 33
    It requires minimal modifications to the infrastructure of the positional areas. But since the 90s, I think. Yankes have reliable information about the "mines". It will not be superfluous to have the right to a preemptive strike.
    Then the effect of the use of "Sarmatov" will increase significantly.
    1. +1
      25 March 2020 23: 17
      Quote: knn54
      It will not be superfluous to still have the right to a preemptive strike.
      Then the effect of the use of "Sarmatov" will increase significantly.

      Colleague, a preventive strike is delivered from the shortest distance in the shortest possible time. It should be a stiletto, not a two-handed sword! Therefore, the RS-28 will be a punishing "two-handed sword", the role of a needle in the heart of the amam will be played by GZ missiles, cruise and ballistic, most likely from SN nuclear submarines. So that the enemy does not have time to make the necessary decisions ...
      These are the basics of OI and Strategy! This is exactly what ama expects to do with us, under certain conditions ...
      AHA.
  8. +1
    25 March 2020 16: 34
    Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
    Quote: Victor_B
    Rejoice Americans!
    A replacement for Satan arrived.
    Heat and light in your home can deliver guaranteed.


    We rejoice together - 1 rocket - no hospital built ... 5 schools

    You will be very happy, you will go to help build the starting mines of these clappers. To the Northern Urals. There you will not need schools or hospitals.
  9. 0
    25 March 2020 16: 58
    I, too, was ready to become a man at the age of 13-14, but this event happened later. Complete the tests first! And then ready!
    1. +2
      25 March 2020 19: 49
      production should be ready by the end of the tests - otherwise the rocket will remain in the design
  10. 0
    25 March 2020 16: 59
    Putin said that Sarmat will be equipped with a wide range of nuclear weapons, what do you think which warheads can be mounted on a rocket?
  11. +2
    25 March 2020 17: 31
    Quote: Honest Citizen
    Well, if it’s ready, then proceed to release.
    Why shake the air for nothing.
    And release more, more. So that the "partners" feel it.

    Another portion of noodles on the ears! Everything in the store for caps with 3 peaks, two side covers to cover the ears from the noodles. What a pancake, production, if there were only 2 cast and more than one flight. At least spend at least a LI cycle, and then talk about production. And then LEE planned at the end of 2017, then 2018 and finally 2019. The 1st quarter of 2020 is coming to an end, and there were no flight crews either.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      25 March 2020 17: 57
      Quote: Old26
      At least spend at least a LI cycle, and then talk about production. And then LEE planned at the end of 2017, then 2018 and finally 2019. The 1st quarter of 2020 is coming to an end, and there were no flight crews either.


      Shoigu said the readiness of production for release. Including bench products for testing. And so - as soon as so right away.
  12. 5-9
    -1
    26 March 2020 07: 49
    Sarmat very unexpectedly quickly designed and almost completed and prepared the production ... did not expect. Still, in a liquid rocket we can ... or started to do it much earlier than even rumors appeared about it ..... well!
  13. +2
    26 March 2020 10: 36
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Quote: Victor_B
    A replacement for Satan arrived.

    Undoubtedly so.
    But the author made a mistake:
    The RS-28 Sarmat ICBM is being prepared to replace the world's most powerful silo-based ICBM, the RS-20V Voevoda (NATO - SS-18 Satan).
    The thing is that the RS (missile system, consisting of at least 11 elements) and ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missile - 1 product) are not the same thing. In the RS-20V was the ICBM R-36M2 (15A18M) ...

    You are not quite right, Alexander. RS is not a designation of a system (complex), but a contractual designation of a missile under START and WWS treaties.

    Quote: slipped
    Quote: Old26
    At least spend at least a LI cycle, and then talk about production. And then LEE planned at the end of 2017, then 2018 and finally 2019. The 1st quarter of 2020 is coming to an end, and there were no flight crews either.


    Shoigu said the readiness of production for release. Including bench products for testing. And so - as soon as so right away.

    The fact that the production is ready is good. But mass production of a rocket since 2021 ... Yet mass production implies that the rocket is tested
  14. +2
    26 March 2020 11: 42
    Quote: 5-9
    Sarmat very unexpectedly quickly designed and almost completed and prepared the production ... did not expect. Still, in a liquid rocket we can ... or started to do it much earlier than even rumors appeared about it ..... well!

    Unexpectedly fast ?? Almost done before ?? Are you serious? We started work on the product in 2010-2011. They have been working for 9 years, but the end has not yet been seen. There has not been a single flight test.
  15. 0
    26 March 2020 19: 31
    Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich
    We rejoice together - 1 rocket - no hospital built ... 5 schools

    Well this is pure Ukrainian trend laughing
    In Russia, a different trend wink
    "Following the results of 11 months of 2019, 67 thousand tons of meat and edible meat offal in the amount of $ 92,8 million were shipped to Ukraine"
    And with the money raised we will build 20 hospitals and 50 schools, and for the remainder a couple more "Sarmatovs" at Russian enterprises (paying salaries to the Russians) Yes