In the European press, materials about the threat from hypersonic weapons of the Russian Federation and China for the United States called "hype"
The Western press publishes more and more materials that talk about modern hypersonic weapons. So, in the publication "European Diplomacy" an article was published by Michael Unbehauen, in which he wonders if the constant mention of hypersonic military developments and their threat is nothing more than hype, hype.
Unbehauen is trying to contradict the author of the American newspaper The New York Times, which says that with the advent of hypersonic weapons in Russia and with the development of such in China, the US missile defense system has obvious problems. The NYT says that with the advent of hypersonic missile systems there was a real revolution in the world of weapons. At the same time, the hypersonic weapon itself is called a “slot machine” for those who try to intercept it - in the sense that it is completely unclear what to expect from such weapons. The American material says that to protect against hypersonic missiles, "US missile defense should be like protecting Spartan warriors - be a solid shield." From the article:
The author in the publication “European Diplomacy” actually accuses American fellow journalists of pessimism. In the material by Michael Unbehauen:
The author believes that initially the US missile defense system was not intended to intercept all the intercontinental ballistic missiles that are in the arsenal of Russia and China (here it must be recalled that initially its missile defense system in Washington was presented as a system “against Iranian missiles”). "Some missiles could / could overcome the missile defense system anyway."
Unbehauen:
The European author accused American observers writing about hypersonic weapons of almost panic. Apparently, Mr. Unbehauen somewhat forgets that the articles in NYT are often aimed at a specific task: to ensure the next expansion of the United States military budget.
Information