Syria, March 21-22: militants attacked SAA positions in Latakia and Idlib

5
Syria, March 21-22: militants attacked SAA positions in Latakia and Idlib

On the weekend of March 21-22, the situation in Syria remained quite tense. The Syrian Arab army clashed with militants of terrorist groups in several provinces of the country.

In the northeastern part of Latakia province, militants of the Khayyat Tahrir al-Sham organization banned in Russia attacked positions of government forces (SAA). For attacks were used, in particular, anti-tank systems. According to some reports, we are talking about ATGM TOW. Fired areas of the villages of Al-Hader and Al-Hadad. A battle ensued. In response, Syrian artillery covered the enemy’s positions with their fire.



Clashes took place in the province of Idlib. Here, government troops were also forced to return fire at the positions of the KhTS in the area of ​​the village of Safukhan. Then, the positions of terrorists in the area of ​​the village of Kafr-Jalis were bombarded. It was from this place that the KhTS militants had previously fired at the positions of the Syrian Arab army.

Another clash occurred in the south of Idlib province, in the area of ​​the village of Al-Fatira. Here, the HTS fighters opened fire on the positions of the SAA, after which the Syrian artillery was forced to fire in response to the reinforced positions of the militants.

Thus, we see that Khayyat Tahrir al-Sham is not going to abide by the peace agreements. Obviously, the militants of this organization will continue to carry out attacks against government troops and shelling their positions. Naturally, the Syrian Arab army will have to react to such actions, suppressing the enemy firing points with the help of missile forces and artillery.

As for the Turkish armed forces, they continue to patrol on the M4 Aleppo-Latakia highway. By the way, in the area of ​​the village of Arikh, the militants resorted to new tactics - they organized a sit-down strike on the highway by the forces of civilians supporting them. Turkish troops do not react to the protest, since the demonstrators are determined not to let in only Russian military patrols.

In the area of ​​the M4 highway, movements of Turkish troops were also observed. The next military convoy of dozens of cars and heavy equipment arrived. In total, from the time of the ceasefire, the Turkish armed forces transferred 1440 to Idlib and Aleppo tanks, armored vehicles and trucks, and the number of military contingent is 9650 people.

Meanwhile, in the vicinity of the village of Tarnab and the city of Mizbit, Turkish troops erected several fortifications. Another Turkish fortified point appeared in the area of ​​the village of Shalah, and the day before the Turks had equipped positions near the village of Basankul.



The deployment of more and more fortified points of the Turkish army indicates that Ankara intends to seriously gain a foothold in Idlib and is unlikely to abandon its military presence in this Syrian province in the foreseeable future.

Analysts do not accidentally compare the Turkish policy in Idlib with the situation in the 1970s in Cyprus. There, under the auspices of Turkey, it was possible to create the unrecognized Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which still exists. In Syria, a repetition of such a model is quite possible: the Turks, having occupied part of the northern regions of the country, are clearly not going to leave from there.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    22 March 2020 08: 56
    The Turk must be expelled by force of arms. It is a pity that the Syrian army is weak for this, but if the Kurds from those tribes who did not want to see the Turks in their lands coordinated their military operations with the Syrian army, the Turks would receive such a response to aggression that they would be forced to leave Syria.
  2. +3
    22 March 2020 09: 31
    Analysts do not accidentally compare the Turkish policy in Idlib with the situation in the 1970s in Cyprus. There, under the auspices of Turkey, it was possible to create the unrecognized Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which still exists. In Syria, a repetition of such a model is quite possible: the Turks, having occupied part of the northern regions of the country, are clearly not going to leave from there.

    On the side of the Greek Cypriots in the 70s, military aircraft of the USSR did not fight.
    The situation has changed.
    Askers anxiously look at the sky ... wink
    1. +3
      22 March 2020 10: 37
      Cyprus in 1974 was divided into 2 parts after the Greek "black colonels" (in fact, the Pinochet) decided to take Cyprus by force, which did not fall under Ataturk's repatriation program in the early 20s - then it was under England. Then, in 1974, the Turks got excited and began to fight with the Greeks. Until now, no one recognizes Turkish Cyprus except Turkey. And according to his program, Ataturk resettled all the Greeks from Turkey (where they lived long before the Turks - for example, Diogenes lived in Sinope), so there was a massive resettlement of Turks from Greece, and Greeks from Turkey, very far-sighted. And only Cyprus was unlucky.
      1. +4
        22 March 2020 10: 46
        I’ll clarify: the transfer program of the Greeks and Turks was organized by the League of Nations.
        Ataturk supported her.
        And Nansen (a former polar explorer) led everything - Commissioner of the League of Nations
        for Refugees.
        1. 0
          22 March 2020 12: 50
          Thanks for the addition. Though the League of Nations did something useful.
    2. 0
      22 March 2020 19: 13
      Quote: Paul Siebert
      The situation has changed.

      hi
      Has changed. The "Sultan" declared a jihad to Greece (and therefore the EU), no less and no more:
  3. 0
    22 March 2020 09: 34
    The Syrians are also not, suckers are full. At the moment, Moscow and Damascus do not officially comment on the transfer of military equipment to Idlib, however, experts believe that the Syrian side may well be preparing for an offensive operation. Since over the past two weeks, Turkey has not led terrorists out of the M4 highway and still has not conducted a single joint patrol with the Russian military in this region. (Joint runs of 1-3 km on television cameras do not count).

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"