The first IL-76MD-90A built this year took off in Ulyanovsk

114
The first IL-76MD-90A built this year took off in Ulyanovsk

The first military transport aircraft Il-76MD-90A built this year on the Aviastar-SP JSC took off in Ulyanovsk. According to the press service of the enterprise, this is the first IL-76MD-90A, launched into the air in 2020.

As previously reported, last year Aviastar-SP transferred three military transport aircraft Il-76MD-90A to the BTA of the Russian Aerospace Forces, of which only one was built during 2019, and two were built in 2018 with a transfer in 2019. It was reported that the delivery of two of the five planned to be transferred in 2019 military transport aircraft Il-76MD-90A was postponed to 2020. The delay is due to the untimely receipt of components from the enterprises of cooperation.



Thus, we can confidently say that one of the two Il-76MD-90As, whose transmission was postponed this year, took off. By the way, last year Ilyushin was assured that both Ila will be delivered in the first quarter of this year. In addition, in 2020, Ilyushin is to transfer another six Il-76MD-90A to the Ministry of Defense.

In total, the Russian military department plans to purchase more than 2030 IL-100MD-76A and promising IL-90MD-78A tankers created on their basis by 90.

The heavy military transport IL-76MD-90A is a profound modernization of the IL-76MD aircraft. The new IL-76MD-90A, unlike the drill IL-76MD, is equipped with PS-90A-76 engines with a thrust of up to 14,5 tons instead of the "standard" D-30KP2 with a thrust of up to 12 tons. The aircraft received a new wing and a “glass” cockpit: the gauges were replaced by instruments with LCD displays. At IL-76MD-90A, the carrying capacity increased to 60 tons and the range of delivery of troops and cargo - up to 5000 km.
  • https://russianplanes.net/id264027
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

114 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -25
    21 March 2020 12: 37
    Is there even a toilet in IL-76MD-90A?
    1. +16
      21 March 2020 12: 51
      Quote: China
      Is there even a toilet in IL-76MD-90A?

      Who is talking about what, but lousy about the bath. Are you having trouble urinating and defecating? Then stay away from aviation. As the saying goes - "Such people are not taken as astronauts" hi
      1. -14
        21 March 2020 12: 55
        So already there is latrine or cost a high-tech nano-bucket to replace galvanization?
        1. -3
          21 March 2020 13: 12
          Quote: China
          So already there is latrine or cost a high-tech nano-bucket to replace galvanization?

          How does the toilet topic concern you? You see nothing more. Are you experiencing problems in this regard?

          For a long time there are dry closets. But such anxious 3acrants on board nothing to do.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +2
          21 March 2020 20: 22
          Maybe a couple of rolls of toilet paper? Mandatory. Otherwise, the plane will not fly. laughing
      2. +16
        21 March 2020 13: 31
        Try to spend 6 hours in flight without a toilet. Especially if you fly overnight and drink cups of coffee. The question is fair. Its presence will simplify the life of the crew.
        1. +2
          21 March 2020 13: 36
          Quote: Berkut154
          Try to spend 6 hours in flight without a toilet. Especially if you fly overnight and drink cups of coffee. The question is fair. Its presence will simplify the life of the crew.

          On board each crew member has a container called a urinal. Or do you need a public toilet tiled and granny at the checkout?
          1. +6
            21 March 2020 13: 55
            Where is it ? At 76 ????
            1. +2
              21 March 2020 14: 07
              Quote: Berkut154
              Where is it ? At 76 ????

              On the Tu-95, and it has a longer flight duration.
              1. +6
                21 March 2020 14: 18
                We are talking about the transporter) there, too, people serve performing combat missions. By the way, this is not only about the full-time crew, often accompanying either the military or from industry fly with cargo. This is usually from one to 20 people ...
                1. +5
                  21 March 2020 14: 22
                  I mean, don’t accumulate on all the bottles .... passengers, as a rule, don’t know at all what they should be taken, but if they took it, they will spill it in a bolt or tighten it up and put it loose and it will fall and everything will flow out of it, then the driver will gets tired of doing tidy))))) it’s easier to build a normal latrine.
                2. +2
                  21 March 2020 15: 07
                  Quote: Berkut154
                  By the way, this is not only about the full-time crew, often accompanying either the military or from industry fly with cargo. This is usually from one to 20 people.

                  When I had to make long flights of 6-8 hours on the old An-12, I took my regular urinal with the Tu-95 with me on a flight. By the way, I have never used it. So until the end of the service and remained brand new.
        2. +3
          21 March 2020 15: 58
          Instead of coffee, there are things that do not require frequent use of the toilet. And in general, who flew the An-12, for the 76th - the dream of a lifetime.
          1. +2
            21 March 2020 19: 26
            Termi NahTer (Nikolai):Instead of coffee for pilots, there are things that do not require frequent visits to the toilet

            Father, and he served on the Il-76, brought energy chocolate "Cola" from the service. They were given it either in standard tiles or in round flat metal jars. Interestingly, it was written on the packaging - it is forbidden to give to children, but we cracked it for a sweet soul smile
            1. +6
              22 March 2020 03: 46
              Dmitriy hi And I once had a chance to have a bite (to the whisper of my father - this is "War chocolate") a piece cut off from an unseen earlier tile. Size - about a baking sheet of a 4-burner stove and 3-4 cm thick. I was surprised not by the taste, but by the size. good
              1. -1
                22 March 2020 05: 30
                Greetings, Sergey.
                isn’t it by chance?

                And my Ivanovo classmate's mother worked at a confectionery factory. Where the famous "bird's milk" was produced. Unfortunately, I don't remember what it was called. He brought clean chocolate three fingers thick to school. We pricked, divided and ate it with the whole class. smile
                1. +4
                  22 March 2020 05: 53
                  No, there was a tray-sized tile. Maybe a semi-finished product? And the factory is called Krasnaya Zarya, and it still works. True, "Bird's Milk" does not produce in that hypostasis. The soufflé is now only white, before there was also yellow (lemon) and brown (chocolate) in one box. It was always interesting - which one comes across. wink Yes
                2. +4
                  22 March 2020 06: 00
                  Here it is after reconstruction

                  And this is a general view
                  1. -2
                    22 March 2020 06: 25
                    On March 8, my son presented a mouth-front box of bird milk with the inscription "present" to his wife. And I tell him that only Ivanovo made the real "bird's milk" in the union. The recipe for these sweets was given to them by Polish confectioners from the sister city of Lodz in 1967.
                    These are real
                    1. +4
                      22 March 2020 06: 30
                      So. Yes And it is in these boxes. good And here is the cinema "Lodz". It still works.
                3. 0
                  April 9 2020 09: 31
                  Anyone who has visited Argentina or Latin America in general, I mean more than one day’s journey, he knows that such chocolate, only not round but shaped like a regular one, only 2 cm thick. You can buy 12 by 30 cm in the most ordinary store in Argentina in 2017 such a tile. It cost 100 pesos.
        3. +1
          22 March 2020 08: 58
          Quote: Berkut154
          The question is fair.

          Isn’t it easier to open the plane’s drawing and find the answer to the question yourself than to show the inability to elementary search for information of interest? what
      3. +1
        21 March 2020 14: 21
        As they say - "Such people are not taken as astronauts"
        - a little adjusted, Piramidon.
        And yet - the bucket, of course, will replace everything.
      4. +3
        21 March 2020 15: 46
        But what if a company of fighters across the country from the Far East is thrown aboard !? Tolerate, as always, in a plastic bottle, in a bucket! Well, the normal question was asked why scam !?
        1. +1
          21 March 2020 19: 54
          Throughout the country, the 76th without landing will not fly. This means that there will be landings for refueling, it will be possible to feed the company and bring it to the toilet.
    2. -5
      21 March 2020 13: 12
      Judging by the minuses, the inhabitants of VO believe that the IL76 is equipped with a toilet ... Sad ignorance.
      1. +1
        21 March 2020 13: 17
        Quote: China
        Judging by the minuses, the inhabitants of VO believe that the IL76 is equipped with a toilet ... Sad ignorance.

        Wow, you are blaspheming. No stationary toilets are enough. How long have you been flying, a connoisseur of aviation?
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +1
            21 March 2020 16: 00
            To each his own - to whom to fly, and to whom to fly. The second excites you more. What are you doing here, comrade ordinary - suffering from diarrhea
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
    3. +13
      21 March 2020 13: 50
      Quote: China
      Is there even a toilet in IL-76MD-90A?


      Of course)))
      We go here:



      And we see:


      After which we understand that there is a toilet, there is no queue, no money is taken, but we must be careful wink wink
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +4
      21 March 2020 19: 15
      Quote: China
      Is there even a toilet in IL-76MD-90A?



      https://vpk.name/news/92211_v_rossii_sozdali_pervyi_desantnyi_samolet_s_tualetom.html


      Russian paratroopers will no longer have problems with the toilet during training or combat missions. The new Russian landing aircraft Il-76MD-90A, better known as the "Il-476 project," was equipped with a full toilet cabin with a toilet and a washstand.
    6. 0
      21 March 2020 22: 56
      The more oaks in the army, the stronger our defense. What other toilets are you talking about? Why do you need a piece of paper? All wheel controls smell. But seriously, incomparable honor and respect, admiration for the real heroes-aviators!
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. +2
      22 March 2020 08: 33
      Quote: China
      Is there even a toilet in IL-76MD-90A?

      Uzbagoyza. There is.
      https://iz.ru/news/552686
  2. +11
    21 March 2020 12: 38
    As an engineer (not a specialist in aviation, but simply an electronic engineer), I believe that the vitality of a "glass" cockpit is multiples of individual devices. In the event of a breakdown of one device, only its information disappears. In the event of a panel breakdown, a whole group of readings disappears. Is not it? And the survivability of the device, kmk, is much higher than the survivability of the panel. Can someone explain the benefits of replacing those in the subject? well, except for a penny gain in weight. That's really interesting.
    1. +3
      21 March 2020 12: 51
      Quote: Fast_mutant
      in case of failure of one device

      The engineer is obliged to use the terms of the "Reliability in Engineering" standard. There are concepts of "malfunction" and "failure". There is no concept of "breakdown". It is the girls who break, not the devices.
    2. +4
      21 March 2020 12: 55
      Maybe there is not only duplication of equipment, but also its increased protection not only from impacts, but also from fragments, and channel spacing for better security! So, breaking a pair of despleys is unpleasant, but not critical!
    3. +2
      21 March 2020 13: 06
      Quote: Fast_mutant
      As an engineer (not a specialist in aviation, but simply an electronic engineer), I believe that the vitality of a "glass" cockpit is multiples of individual devices. In the event of a breakdown of one device, only its information disappears. In the event of a panel breakdown, a whole group of readings disappears. Is not it? And the survivability of the device, kmk, is much higher than the survivability of the panel. Can someone explain the benefits of replacing those in the subject? well, except for a penny gain in weight. That's really interesting.

      I completely agree with you. Conventional arrow devices were duplicated many times, they did not have any electronic glitches (only mechanical breakdowns). Each crew member had the main instruments - speed and altitude indicators, and the RPM system was duplicated. And now it turns out, as with my old Soviet magnetic radio "Romance" - a power trance or ULF flew and I lost both the tape recorder, and the receiver, and the player.
      1. +2
        21 March 2020 20: 35
        Quote: Piramidon
        And now it turns out, as with my old Soviet radio tape recorder "Romance"

        Wrong. If such "old Soviet radio tape recorders" Romance "were on airplanes, then there would be at least three" power transformers ", or" ULF ".
      2. +7
        22 March 2020 03: 57
        What do you need to do with her to burn out the trance? I had a portable "Romantic-304" with a network BP-12-5. It was dropped in the New Year and switched to 127V without looking, there was such an opportunity. He began to warm up - shoved into the open window. I spent the whole night without interruption, I only noticed and corrected it by the evening of January 1st. No consequences. The safety factor has worked.
      3. +1
        22 March 2020 11: 46
        Quote: Piramidon
        Conventional switches have been duplicated many times

        Have you at least seen the cockpit of the aircraft of the 3rd and 4th generations with "dial gauges"? There is simply no room for duplication. Some important in-cockpit indicators had to be placed in an area of ​​poor visibility. In addition, analog "mechanical devices" have a high cost, unsatisfactory weight and size characteristics and low reliability (yes, Karl, low), so "digitalization" was carried out. Only "digital" provides the possibility of 3 ... 4-fold redundancy while reducing the total weight and cost of equipment. At the same time, multifunctional digital displays provide flexibility in informing the crew, depending on the flight task being solved. Digital systems are easier to maintain and upgrade. However, you need to have access to advanced production technologies (well, one deputy prime minister promised to solve this problem, he probably solved it).
        The only question is resistance to the damaging factors of nuclear weapons.
    4. +1
      21 March 2020 20: 30
      Quote: Fast_mutant
      In the event of a panel breakdown - a whole group of readings disappears.

      Didn’t you hear that in aviation there is such a thing as duplication? One panel fails, then the second pilot, the second will be operational.
    5. 0
      22 March 2020 05: 53
      For aviation and astronautics, a double reserve is used. If the main system fails, which automatically or manually, depending on the complexity of the product, switches to the backup, i.e. to the emergency bus. It is always duplicated in order to save the car from the death of the crew and cargo.
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      21 March 2020 12: 53
      And the technical task provided for the possibility of landing?
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +7
          21 March 2020 13: 58
          My regards ! hi I'm not an aviator, but does IL-76 seem to have an airborne transport board?
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. +7
              21 March 2020 14: 25
              Hopefully all issues have been fixed. I didn't start from the ramp, only through the side ramp ... And not from Ila, but from "Annushka" or Mishka.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. +4
                  21 March 2020 14: 45
                  A neighbor from the DShB from the ramp had experience. But it was a long time ago, even under the USSR.
                2. +8
                  21 March 2020 15: 02
                  Quote from rudolf
                  And now only through the side, they refused from the ramp. Why dont know.

                  They justify with frequent overlaps.
        2. +6
          21 March 2020 14: 29
          Quote from rudolf
          I just remember that there were complaints about the first take-off car, and then immediately a contract for almost 40 boards.

          Comrade, I can’t understand in any way how, judging by the article, the Ministry of Defense was going to buy more than a hundred boards by 2030, if the output is 2 units per year?
          Local residents of Ulyanovsk say that the local aircraft plant "lies on its side" and breathes poorly, and 2 sides for the VTA are a drop in the sea. Sadness ...
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. +6
                21 March 2020 14: 58
                Quote from rudolf
                Therefore, I wrote below that it is a pity that the tanker project based on the IL-96 did not go. It would be simpler to the plant, and as a tanker, the IL-96 is preferable.

                I agree, but the BTA just suffocates from a lack of boards, Trishkin Kaftan is all called. hi
          2. -1
            21 March 2020 15: 29
            Quote: Malyuta
            Local residents of Ulyanovsk say that the local aircraft plant "lies on its side" and breathes poorly

            The only way to restore production is to produce. This is commonplace, but nothing else can be invented. Well, how much will be produced by 2030 in 2030 and it will be necessary to discuss, maybe 100, maybe less.
    2. +1
      21 March 2020 20: 39
      The possibility of landing personnel and military equipment is a prerequisite for military transport aircraft.
  4. +8
    21 March 2020 12: 49
    It's nice to read news from the Russian Federation about new take-off planes! Suppose, so far not as much as we would like, but the road will overpower the walking one!
  5. +7
    21 March 2020 12: 51
    In total, the Russian military department plans to purchase until 2030 over 100 IL-76MD-90A and promising Il-78MD-90A tankers created on their basis.

    To do this, at least double the annual construction program of IL 76MD-90A!
    1. 0
      21 March 2020 14: 30
      Quote: kapitan92
      To do this, at least double the annual construction program of IL 76MD-90A!

      Who needs? Who needs it, let it increase (if possible, in principle). Anyone interested can look for different versions of the production program of this aircraft, which were published after 1991.
  6. -2
    21 March 2020 13: 11
    The aircraft received a new wing and a "glass" cockpit: the dial gauges were replaced by LCD displays.

    If during World War II, duralumin was the most high-tech material for aircraft construction, and aircraft built from it received a strong advantage. Now, such a material is composites, and the more composites on the plane, the greater gain in weight we get. We need to develop this industry with us.
    1. +1
      21 March 2020 15: 54
      The most high-tech material in WWII was wood. Yes, and now too. Composites are just a very low-tech material.
    2. 0
      22 March 2020 22: 44
      Quote: lucul
      the more composites on the plane, the greater the gain in weight we get.

      Composites are not an unambiguous plus, there are also negative sides.
      For example, the limited life of composite parts. Flying 50 years, like the An-12, a plastic plane does not fly, his wings will fall off.
    3. 0
      25 March 2020 23: 03
      Quote: lucul
      The aircraft received a new wing and a "glass" cockpit: the dial gauges were replaced by LCD displays.

      If during World War II, duralumin was the most high-tech material for aircraft construction, and aircraft built from it received a strong advantage. Now, such a material is composites, and the more composites on the plane, the greater gain in weight we get. We need to develop this industry with us.

      The most technologically advanced material of the Second World War was deltadrevesin Yes
  7. 0
    21 March 2020 13: 25
    It would be nice to expand the fuselage, but this is a new smolzhet.
    1. -1
      21 March 2020 15: 15
      Quote: Pavel57
      It would be nice to expand the fuselage

      What for?
      1. 0
        21 March 2020 17: 27
        To make loading equipment easier. The Chinese made their counterpart, the S-20, based on a modern view of the volume of cargo carried.
        1. -2
          21 March 2020 20: 43
          Quote: Pavel57
          To make loading equipment easier.

          Across, or what?
          1. -1
            21 March 2020 21: 45
            Exactly, across. Chinese way.
  8. -1
    21 March 2020 13: 35
    Quote: Man
    I like these transporters, developed back in Soviet times.

    Similarly. I look at him and calm, delightful confidence that he is the best grows in the soul.
  9. +1
    21 March 2020 13: 44
    and civilian kada? zadolbalo me Boeing-Zhmoinga fly.
  10. +2
    21 March 2020 14: 04
    The plane is certainly good, but ...
  11. +1
    21 March 2020 14: 07
    Il reliable car. No wonder the first board is Il. Of course the other is a bit, but Il.
    1. -2
      21 March 2020 14: 41
      Quote: Finn
      Il reliable car.

      So so. This is on "IL", and (conditionally) "United Aircraft Corporation". There are no data on reliability, since they can only be obtained from the results of the experiment, i.e. operation of a sufficiently large number of objects (several dozen) for a "sufficiently long" period of time in various climatic conditions with a "sufficiently large" raid.
      Secondly, "reliability" is a complex property of an object of technology, which, in particular, includes the following (particular) properties of reliability: reliability (the average number of failures per conventional unit of raid), adaptability to maintenance (resource costs for transferring an object from a faulty state in good working order), durability.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +1
    21 March 2020 14: 53
    In Soviet times, a dozen aircraft were made during the year. And these fifth in five years did
    1. 0
      21 March 2020 15: 16
      Quote: Maks-80
      In Soviet times, a dozen aircraft were made during the year. And these fifth in five years did

      In the Union, the budget was not cut, but they were personally responsible for their promises, hence the fulfillment. The very name "Aviastar" evokes overseas associations. When will Russian enterprises be Russian, at least in name? I can imagine how many sentences they throw in, like "Marfa & Co" smile
      1. 0
        23 March 2020 09: 35
        The Union did not cut the budget, but for their promises were personally responsible, hence the implementation

        Well, not always. For example, Tupolev promised to make the Tu-154 in 70 tons. I didn’t, but Iilushin competed with the line of planes.
    2. +3
      21 March 2020 15: 37
      Quote: Maks-80
      In Soviet times, a dozen aircraft were made during the year.

      Then the adjusted conveyor worked, and now it is being restarted.
      1. -1
        21 March 2020 16: 06
        Quote: Dart2027
        Then the adjusted conveyor worked

        in the bread city of Tashkent.
        1. +2
          21 March 2020 16: 28
          Quote: iouris
          in the bread city of Tashkent.

          Do you seriously believe that it was made by Uzbeks? Yes, completely and completely, to the last bolt?
          Firstly, the production of an airplane (ship, nuclear power plant, etc.) is always the work of several industries, and the plant that produces the product itself largely collects it in the body (engines are brought from one counterparty, a control system from another, etc. .), and all this was done all over the USSR.
          Secondly, in the USSR there was a "wonderful" tradition to develop the outskirts by sending Russians there as a highly qualified labor force.
          1. -4
            21 March 2020 21: 29
            Quote: Dart2027
            Do you seriously believe that it was made by Uzbeks?

            Walk through the streets of Moscow - Uzbeks do everything.
            1. +3
              21 March 2020 21: 51
              Quote: iouris
              Uzbeks do everything

              Yards sweeping?
    3. -4
      21 March 2020 15: 57
      Did much more, but that's what the union ended remember?
      1. 0
        21 March 2020 21: 31
        Quote: Sergey Valov
        what union ended remember?

        Do you mean the victory of "family", democracy and liberalism? Are you against it?
        1. -1
          21 March 2020 23: 40
          I mean the bankruptcy of the system.
    4. +2
      21 March 2020 16: 06
      Quote: Maks-80
      In Soviet times, a dozen aircraft were made during the year.

      It depends on what kind. Only the Moscow (Lukhovitsy) or Irkutsk plant at the beginning of 1980 produced up to 30 aircraft (per month!) Each, respectively MiG-23 and MiG-27. Therefore, Gaddafi, when France promised to deliver 30 Mirages within 5 years, turned to the USSR, drove oil gold and a month later had as much as he wanted. In September 1982, after a well-known confusion in Lebanon, about a hundred aircraft were delivered to Syria.
      1. -6
        21 March 2020 16: 14
        Quote: iouris
        Only Moscow (Lukhovitsy) or Irkutsk plant in early 1980 produced up to 30 aircraft (per month!) Each, respectively, MiG-23 and MiG-27

        And what for (now) there are so many files in the house? wink
        1. +1
          21 March 2020 16: 23
          They are trying to restart Mig with Mig35m, which means that it is necessary ..... but something is going on hard.
          1. -5
            21 March 2020 16: 24
            Quote: Zaurbek
            They try to restart the Mig with the Mig35m, which means that you need ...

            Yes, I’m in the know ... but not on the same thing a day ... not a war, yet, chat request
            1. +1
              21 March 2020 16: 31
              I don’t know with Mig .... they were produced even in the Russian Federation. And with Il, it’s like starting a new one. Thinking of PS90 manufacturers making 400 turbojet engines up to 30 years is no easy task.
          2. +1
            22 March 2020 06: 14
            It is not so easy to launch into the production process from scratch, especially a new product like the MiG-35 - everything depends on both components and personnel. With the latter, it’s just a misfortune, young people are not willing to go, everyone cites a small salary, plus there are still very few competent specialists in all areas - from fuselage specialists to electricians and electronics engineers. More white collar workers than car assemblers.
      2. +2
        21 March 2020 16: 23
        Irkutsk produced much less, but the Banner of Labor really, pitch 23 like pies, he himself put a little work into this madness. And Lukhovitsy was only a branch doing wing and plumage.
    5. 0
      21 March 2020 20: 51
      Quote: Maks-80
      In Soviet times, a dozen aircraft were made during the year.

      Here everyone is advocating an increase in aircraft production. Who will fly them? The "production" of pilots was cut more than the production of aircraft.
    6. 0
      22 March 2020 06: 06
      And you wanted when there was wahanalia privatization of enterprises at the mercy of the nouveau riche? And plus the breaks in all ties of suppliers of components for aviation, especially for aircraft manufacturers.
      I myself am an aircraft manufacturer, and I know what the shortages of components are. Hence the shifts to the right. This is the first. Second, the machine itself does not stand still during construction at the factory site, often there are improvements and changes both in design and in general in terms of requirements of military customers. The same picture is in civil aviation, it is even tougher, according to the standards of MAKS, if I am not mistaken.
  14. 0
    21 March 2020 15: 10
    only one was built during 2019

    One a year.
    The agency plans to purchase, by 2030, more than 100 IL-76MD-90A and promising tankers Il-78MD-90A created on their basis.

    It will be hard ...
    1. -1
      21 March 2020 16: 24
      It would be a desire, power allow.
      1. 0
        21 March 2020 16: 39
        Quote: Sergey Valov
        It would be a desire, power allow.

        Well, Duc, I - only "for"! But with the current state of affairs (1 piece per year) the range of 100 pieces in 10 years will be difficult. And in money and in people, specialists.
        1. 0
          21 March 2020 16: 44
          I suspect that the matter is not even in money and in technological equipment. The problem is people, specialists of all levels - from the worker to the director of the plant. Moreover, the greatest horror is observed in the upper echelon, where there are too many "effective managers" who saw the plane only in the picture.
          1. +1
            21 March 2020 17: 29
            Quote: Sergey Valov
            The problem is in people, specialists at all levels

            Well, I, actually, about that.
            Quote: Sergey Valov
            Moreover, the greatest horror is observed in the upper echelon,

            Is not a fact. The old hard workers are leaving, but who prepares the youth? ProfTehUchilischa - yok ... Everyone in "effective managers" and system administrators are torn, nobody wants to turn the nuts. And then suddenly a sharp increase in the intensity of order fulfillment! What was shouted about at the beginning of the century during the final collapse of industry, they came to that. From a lack of orderlies to a lack of locksmiths ... recourse
            1. 0
              22 March 2020 02: 06
              It’s not very difficult to teach “twist nuts”, but how to teach industry specifics?
  15. +1
    21 March 2020 16: 21
    And they wrote about the modernization of the IL76do a modern level with the replacement of avionics and turbojet engines. What is the state of the program? And is there a development of the PS90 program? Or is it a dead end?
  16. +2
    21 March 2020 16: 27
    On the issue of production rates under the "evil Bolsheviks". The best
    times (mid-80s) TAPOiCh handed over at least 60 aircraft per year.
    In total, over 900 aircraft of this type were produced at this plant.
    type of all modifications.
    1. +1
      21 March 2020 16: 32
      So there is also a wing for the An-124 managed to do.
  17. 0
    21 March 2020 16: 52
    They are very slow to build, but of course it's better than nothing.
    1. 0
      21 March 2020 22: 39
      Quote: Alexey from Perm
      it's better than nothing.

      High production means high quality (and reliability) and high export potential at low cost. This means that there are many qualified engineers and workers in the country, there are orders for suppliers of components. And vice versa.
      1. 0
        21 March 2020 23: 09
        logical and sad
        1. -1
          22 March 2020 11: 28
          I have given not facts, but "general provisions", which are confirmed by practice. These positions cannot evoke any emotion.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. +1
    22 March 2020 16: 29
    If you don’t like the car, it doesn’t mean that you need to beat it at least with something in the first silts, they put buckets and new ones have a toilet bowl like in GA salads. It was not provided there because they cannot be installed on the ramp and there is no room for it in the cabin.
  20. 0
    22 March 2020 18: 40
    Quote: iouris
    The only question is resistance to the damaging factors of nuclear weapons.

    Normal stability, the body is shielded there, and the front glass with a sprayed metal mesh! Yes
    We made this topic back in 2003. soldier
    1. -2
      22 March 2020 22: 27
      I believe you. However, for my part, I cannot but notice that such properties of aviation technology are only certified by the results of nuclear test explosions. They have not been held for a very long time. When I was little, there was no television, but the newspapers reported almost every day about the conduct of nuclear explosions in the region of Semipalatinsk. Where is this place?
  21. 0
    23 March 2020 19: 48
    beautiful, I was there (workshops measured in kilometers), the specialists are super, if the plant is not in the New City, then Ulyanovsk is booming!
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. 0
    25 March 2020 22: 59
    Quote: iouris
    I believe you. However, for my part, I cannot but notice that such properties of aviation technology are only certified by the results of nuclear test explosions. Where is this place?

    There are special laboratories where the electromagnetic spectrum and the shock wave of a nuclear explosion are simulated!
    If you really want to, you can find a program about this laboratory on Zvezda! hi

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"