In the United States tested a typical planning block of a hypersonic missile (C-HGB)

In the United States, tests were carried out on a typical building for the planning block of a hypersonic missile (C-HGB), the tests were considered successful. It is reported by the Pentagon press service.

The US Department of Defense published on the channel of the US Navy on YouTube a five-second test video of the planning block, which took place on Friday. Also in a widespread message states that the launch was made by the US Navy in conjunction with the Ground Forces (US Army) at the Pacific Range in Kauai, Hawaii.

On March 19 at 22:30 local time, the Ministry of Defense successfully tested the hypersonic planning unit corps during flight tests (...) launched the C-HGB, which, having developed hypersonic speed, reached the selected point of impact

- said in a statement.

According to Vice Admiral John Wolfe, Program Manager for Strategic Navy Systems Development, the tests are based on "success achieved during the first flight experiment in October 2017, when the C-HGB achieved robust hypersonic planning at a selected distance."

As explained at the Pentagon, in the future, the planning block of a hypersonic missile (C-HGB) is planned to be used to develop its own hypersonic weapons for the Navy and the US Army.

The building block of the planning block tested today is now ready for the transition to the development of weapons systems for the US Navy and Land Forces

- said Michael White, deputy director of research and engineering programs at the Pentagon.

Comments

[Mountain shooter]

Missile launch - there can be any "filling" ... Do we believe that there is a hypersonic gliding block inside?
Alright, alright, gentlemen take our word for it ... in general, any rocket with a decent range has a hypersonic warhead. Learn to manage planning at such speeds? Of course, an achievement ... But this is not a weapon. And still very far from him ...

[voyaka uh]

"Have you learned how to manage planning at such speeds?" ////
----
Good question. It applies to both American and Russian developments.

[slipped]

Quote: voyaka uh

Good question. It applies to both American and Russian developments.

It is already on our combat duty. This is a question learned or not.

[voyaka uh]

Poorly controlled nuclear "deterrent weapons" can also be put on alert.
Which doesn’t matter where it gets (America is big - it’s hard to miss)
but the missile defense is very tense.

[slipped]

Quote: voyaka uh

Poorly controlled nuclear "deterrent weapons" can also be put on alert.
Which doesn’t matter where it gets (America is big - it’s hard to miss)
but the missile defense is very tense.

Have you been mistaken for tea for ages? This was in the 50s and 60s of the past. The meaning of hypersound now is straining a MODERN PRO.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: slipped

The meaning of hypersound now is straining a MODERN PRO.

Colleague, the meaning of the modern GZO is to deliver a preemptive strike. About what the US congressmen grumbled at their gathering in full, that neither is "surrender".
AHA.
PS Will we use it? - This is a question, but such an opportunity does not allow hawks from the Washington chicken coop to sleep peacefully ... It makes the entire military-industrial complex strain - from developers to manufacturers! And he makes politicians more accommodating and less arrogant in the sharp turns of history ...

[slipped]

Quote: BoA KAA

Colleague, the meaning of the modern GZO is to deliver a preemptive strike. About what the US congressmen grumbled at their gathering in full, that neither is "surrender".

In their understanding. Well, we need the ability to overcome their defense mechanisms so that they receive unacceptable damage to them in the event of aggression. To inflict preventive strikes with such weapons, for someone ours is not going to.

Quote: BoA KAA

PS Will we use it? - This is a question, but such an opportunity does not allow hawks from the Washington chicken coop to sleep peacefully ...

So much the worse for them.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: slipped

To inflict preventive strikes with such weapons, for someone ours is not going to.

Yes, we are white and fluffy ... BUT!
If it will be known for certain that a blow to us is a foregone conclusion, I have no doubt that we will not miss our chance.
Secondly, having missed the first "disarming" strike, it is no longer necessary to speak seriously about victory in a modern war with the use of all types of weapons. (Who is the first - that and the slippers!)
Thirdly, only with such weapons will the first strike be delivered. He does not need to bother with missile defense / air defense. Therefore, the trajectories will be on the shortest path, and not through the South geographical pole ... and preferably from under the water, so that they do not even have time to get scared ... the radishes are striped ...
AHA.
PS I'm not bloodthirsty, I really look at things. And the opinion of the beau monde and the Bohemian party that the shit democrats only do that they care about us from the plowfoot ...
They will not have a chance, and the military will take care of this!
June 22, 41 years will never happen again !!!

[voyaka uh]

"This was in the 50s and 60s of the past" ////
----
Good example.
Then the USSR lagged behind the United States and bluffed. He bluffed successfully.
Later in the years 70-80, parity with the United States in strategic nuclear weapons was achieved,
and bluffing became unnecessary.
Now the situation has returned to the 60s. Russia began to lag behind the USA again.
Due to the sharply unequal economic potential of the two countries.
And the military strategic bluff is gradually returning.

[askort154]

voyaka uh ....Now the situation has returned to the 60s. Russia began to lag behind the USA again.
Due to the sharply unequal economic potential of the two countries.
And the military strategic bluff is gradually returning.

Alexey, I get the impression that there is more than one "Israeli citizen" working on the VO website under the nickname "voyakа".
And if you specifically evaluate your comment, it turns out that "Dagger" and "Vanguard" are "cartoons of the military strategic bluff of Russia", and the falling target of the United States in desired point, and having reached hypersound, this is a clear indicator - "because of the unequal economic potential of the two countries." Your "position" strongly resembles a training manual written for "bulk".

[voyaka uh]

Separate:
1) there are no questions with the Dagger. This is an air-based Iskander.
If the plane lets him go at the right point, then he will definitely hit the stationary
target. How Iskander does it. Dagger increases overall range
application of Iskander.
2) my doubt is the accuracy of the vanguard. It is hosted on an ICBM.
She is old, fluid, but well tested. To the States will fly.
But will the glider hit the target? Discussion question.
Will the American glider hit? “I'm not at all sure either.”
----
Therefore, do not drag ideology. These are normal technical
discussions.

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: voyaka uh

Russia began to lag behind the USA again.

Probably ... But why then did the poor fellows alarmed with the expansion of START-3?

Quote: voyaka uh

And the military strategic bluff is gradually returning.

Yes, everyone has seen the "cartoons".

[Boa kaa]

Quote: voyaka uh

Later in the years 70-80, parity was reached with the United States in strategic nuclear weapons ... Now the situation has returned to the 60s. Russia began to lag behind the USA again.
Due to the sharply unequal economic potential of the two countries.
And the military strategic bluff is gradually returning.

Anika warrior you, not a warrior! (with)
1. Our Strategic Missile Forces are already installing on the RS-100UTTKh GZ BBs of the Ju-71 Avangard type. On the way, RS-28 Sarmat with 15A28 ICBMs with orbital capabilities ... In terms of the number of carriers and nuclear warheads placed on them, everything seems to be within the framework of START III. What kind of backlog are we talking about?
2. There is no dispute about the economic potential. But experts are seriously talking about the real 4th place, and not 12th, as you think in Israel. Taking into account the REAL production, and not "the provision of legal services", abundantly replenishing the GDP of your overseas patron.
3. Putin is not Khrushchev - dummies of ICBMs are not dragged across Red Square! "Vanguard" is in service and is on alert. The 3M22 "Zircon" really flies, the X47M2 "Dagger" is on alert ... Where did you see the "bluff", Voyaka?

[slipped]

Quote: voyaka uh

Then the USSR lagged behind the United States and bluffed. He bluffed successfully.

An interesting bluff ... with R-12 missiles in Cuba. God forbid they would apply. The whole world is in ruin.

Quote: voyaka uh

Now the situation has returned to the 60s. Russia began to lag behind the USA again.

STA? Russia still has SNF parity with America. Moreover, our missiles are much newer and more interesting.

Quote: voyaka uh

Due to the sharply unequal economic potential of the two countries.

This is not related to parity, MIT and Krasmash work as before.

Quote: voyaka uh

And the military strategic bluff is gradually returning.

Well, well.

[Voyager]

Alexei, after all, as for bluffing, no one has beaten the Americans with their star wars. Historically, it has always been that the West takes the first step in technology, and the USSR responds with the same or a little more interesting until the next step. The story of hypersonic weapons today shows us all that the concept has changed slightly and that Russia has taken the first step, the west is now catching up.

[Butchcassidy]

Russia began to lag behind the USA again.
Due to the sharply unequal economic potential of the two countries.
And the military strategic bluff is gradually returning.

Are you sure that we are talking about the same reality?))

[Karaul14]

Quote: slipped

It is already on our combat duty. This is a question learned or not.

That is, Putin and his entourage have already lied so many times, but is everything really 100% true? Why do the American declared characteristics look real, and any person who is at least a little familiar with physics laughs with the declared Russian?

[Thrifty]

Fighter, unlike the United States, this does not apply to the Russian blocs! They are controlled very reliably, do not worry! !!

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: Thrifty

They are controlled very reliably, do not worry! !!

But you have to worry ...

[freejack]

Alright, alright, gentlemen take our word for it ...

Gentlemen? Good luck to you! Judging by the video, these "gentlemen" learned how to launch some kind of rocket ...

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: Round smesharik

This is a simple sergeant of the IDF, etc.

This is not an indicator - some "especially gifted" did not rise above the corporal, however ....

[Dmitry Makarov]

Now the Americans will need several Trillions of dollars, urgently need a Hypersonic rocket!

[Thunderbolt]

The launch was made by the US Navy in conjunction with the Ground Forces (US Army) at the Pacific Range in Kauri, Hawaii.

It seems that the launch was from the test territories of the federal territories of the states. There are two such landfills, but judging by the companies, it’s clear from which one.
The area of ​​lowering the head is habitually clear, all the same a cute polygon
\\\ fish, of course sorry ////. The missile route was tracked by the US missile defense system and probably linearly lined up their interceptors. Last time, destroyer detachments formed two equivalent missile defense regions. They are echeloning. understandable --- today we are attacking Kauri, and tomorrow ... may not come, because. we have nuclear parity with the United States. 5 days before the tests, they notified our General Staff about a literal hour of fluff. sharks.We are also Kuru butskay, excitement over the three seas ...

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Thunderbolt

clear and lowering the head

Stormbreaker! What are you celebrating in the morning? Really vernal equinox !? So its navigators are supposed to celebrate ...

[askort154]

Boa constrictor kaa Really vernal equinox !? So its navigators are supposed to celebrate ..

"Navigators are a boorish brat, but they understand their business very well. And therefore - let them go to the wardroom and give a glass ..." Peter - I.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: askort154

Navigators are boorish offspring, but they understand their business viciously.

Undoubtedly mean!
Are you familiar with this decree of the Russian Emperor?
"The navigator is a boorish nature, hungry for women and wine. But for knowledge of the tricky sciences, let them go to the wardroom and give altyns for vodka."

[Thrifty]

Advertising video? Or, think it yourself? ?? Any launch can be passed off as a revolutionary solution to a particular problem!

[Crimean partisan 1974]

sustainable hypersonic planning .......... sho no news then nonsense .... the coolest from the west ...
cold fusion of the nucleus - complete decay,
entangled couple in ferromagnets --- nonsense
Well, I didn’t find myself waiting --- hypersonic planning ,, ..
we like hypersonic controls, and talking about hypersonic planning !!!!!!!!! ... probably get a nobel

[Boa kaa]

The planning block for hypersonic missiles (C-HGB) is planned to be used to develop their own hypersonic weapons for the Navy and the US Army.

In fact, this is still the same work on the programs of the Navy "CPS" and the US Army "LRHW". Teamed up to save money. They follow our path, only with American characteristics. Glider is thrown into space with a 2-stage rocket and from there dives towards the target, several times "bouncing" from the atmosphere. This prodigy is being built for the Virginia SSGN (Block-V) with an insert of a payload unit (rocket for 28 sections) in the middle of the submarine hull. And they expect to adopt this system into service by 2028.
CSKA are going to put the same BB-glider on their BRs by 2023.
And the Air Force is making its own "Dagger" under the Airborne Weapons Defense Program. And it already has a "prototype" with the AGM-183 index, which will enter service in 2022.
So, the Yankees woke up from the euphoria of the "winners" in HV and rushed at all their blades to catch up with these unpredictable Russians with their mysterious Russian soul and the poor Kulibins, whose brains (unlike the Yankees!) Had not yet become fat.
Somehow, however.

[Operator]

The Russian synonym for the planning combat unit is the glider.

Experienced PBB C-HGB is not an analogue of the serial gliding winged unit PKB "Albatros":
- the first is launched by a medium-range ballistic missile and plans in the atmosphere at the terminal portion of the trajectory;
- the second is launched by an intercontinental ballistic missile and plans on the space-atmosphere border on the marching section of the trajectory.

[Amateur]

Tested in the USA typical housing planning bloc

Bad translation again? What is the "typical" case for an experimental "garbage"?

[Cowbra]

As long as it is "nothing". I remember. they also tested the artillery system for Zyama on the shore - very successfully, as they said. Only now three scows are scurrying along the waves, full of feces - but without a single shell

[HMR333]

What is this hat? Dumb rocket launch! Why debugged it! So I can remove the sparrow and say that it is with a hypersonic gliding head! Could just write a text about the test!

[Kostadinov]

Then the USSR lagged behind the United States and bluffed. He bluffed successfully.
Later in the years 70-80, parity with the United States in strategic nuclear weapons was achieved,

The USSR did not eat bluff. The United States has often bluffed since the end of World War II, in the Cold War, detente, and so on.
It all started with Hiroshima. Bluff then hit that the US has a lot of bombs and the means of delivering them to the target are invulnerable. The USSR had no bluffs - the United States knew exactly when the USSR made its nuclear tests, how many charges it had accumulated and what delivery vehicles it had.
Then the United States bluffed with the first thermonuclear device that did not hit the weapon and weighed 50 tons. And the USSR was feeding real bombs dropped from the plane. There was no need for the USSR to bluff in the late 50s and early 60s. There was no parity then, but the USSR had enough nuclear weapons to contain the United States.
Then he hit the first US missile defense bluff to break parity in the 70s, but it didn't work then.
Then he beat the second bluff from the "Star Wars" and the placement of the first strike weapon and the borders of the USSR by Reagan in the 80s, which is said to have had some kind of impact on Gorbachov and his team.
And now we are seeing a new US bluff again, a combination of "star" wars and the deployment of weapons for a first strike on Russia. I think it won't work again.