"Putin is not going to request a truce from Saudi Arabia in the oil war" - US press

193

A major American publication, The New York Times, published material on the state of the Russian economic system. The publication concluded that the sanctions that had previously been imposed against the Russian Federation, as well as counter-sanctions by Russia itself, made it possible to prepare for economic stress.

The authors of the article write that due to the Russian economy being under sanctions, it has already managed to adapt to crises and other financial and economic challenges. In general, NYT considers the economy stress-resistant.



The American publication sees one of the main advantages for the Russian economy in the fact that Russia has gained actual self-sufficiency in essential foodstuffs - agricultural goods. An additional plus is that Russia has “huge financial reserves with more than modest external debt”.

Another major Western publication, Bloomberg, writes that Russia is taking a tough stance in today's "oil confrontation."

The following is reported:

Putin is not going to request a truce from the Saudi Arabia in the oil war. The thing is that Moscow has prepared for such a development of events.

The publication believes that the Kremlin regards the position of the Saudi authorities as blackmail, but is confident that Russia has more chances to get out of the crisis without any problems in the economy than Saudi Arabia.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    193 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +22
      21 March 2020 07: 05
      The Russians do not give up!
      1. -65
        21 March 2020 07: 17
        Yes, yes, we are. We’ll do it and will not wipe our ass, so that we won’t take it for weakness. And it’s so interesting at whose expense the next war will be? Sechin? Miller? I think the question is rhetorical. For yours, including.
        1. +1
          21 March 2020 07: 27
          Do you have any specific suggestions?
          1. -29
            21 March 2020 08: 40
            Russia and Arabia fill the low market with free oil (from Russia's supply).
            The situation - two rams on the bridge can’t part.

            Drive each other into a crisis for the amusement of others. The smartest will be the one who first gives in to the fool. You need to be able to cut losses and not generate further ones.

            By the way, Western experts are pleased to note that if the situation continues, then very soon in order to sell oil it will be necessary to pay extra to the buyer. Since everyone even has storages full of free oil.
            1. +26
              21 March 2020 08: 47
              And I think, Saudi Arabia is not a country with which it is worth speaking on an equal footing if they are in a brazen rod against us. It upsets me that the Hussites still haven’t got modern weapons. Anyway, for a long time there was no revolution there ...
              1. -13
                21 March 2020 09: 03
                Quote: Creedco
                And I think, Saudi Arabia is not a country with which it is worth speaking on equal terms

                Then it is necessary to declare war and force peace. But everyone understands that this will not happen. Then only one option remains. The faster Russia and the SA agree (and it will be anyway, it is only a question of the price that will have to be paid for it), the faster the crisis (oil) will end.

                The whole world is only pulling out from cheaper oil. The United States as a whole, too. The biggest damage is done by SA and Russia.
                Why ruin yourself and give out non-renewable mineral resources for free?
                1. +3
                  21 March 2020 09: 14
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Then it is necessary to declare war and force peace.

                  If the Hussites shy away from something interesting at some pumping station, a hint of which direction to negotiate will be quite understandable to them. Especially if they themselves suffer from this.
                2. +4
                  21 March 2020 10: 07
                  This thesis about non-renewable bowels, like nerves, has already been refuted. You did not read the article carefully. CA will supply its cheap oil on rafts ?! He will regret his "gifts" a hundred times again and will modestly wipe himself with a mean tear and return to his position. Let the United States stick out with its shale until the food riots start there. So we sit quietly and watch the bedding of the State Department.
                  1. +12
                    21 March 2020 18: 36
                    Quote: Artemy Morozov
                    CA will supply its cheap oil on rafts ?! He will regret his "gifts" a hundred times again and will modestly wipe himself with a mean tear and return to his position.

                    already!!! wink duplicate your comment !!!

                    Today, Saudi Arabia and Iraq said they could not provide an early declared discount. This is due to the fact that due to the fall in demand for black gold in Europe and Asia, the extracted oil simply has nowhere to store. Accordingly, supertankers that carry Arab oil began to be used as reservoirs.
                    Most tankers are already full, and there are no customers on them yet. In connection with this situation, the rate on freight of tankers has increased recently by 700% - from $ 30 thousand per day to $ 250 thousand / day.

                    https://zen.yandex.ru/media/dvinsy/rossiia-nachinaet-pobejdat-v-neftianoi-voine-5e74a7a0f702ae63facf06d8?&utm_campaign=dbr
                3. +3
                  21 March 2020 10: 45
                  In general, the Americans arranged this crisis through sa, and it is directed first of all against Venezuela and Iran.
                4. +15
                  21 March 2020 10: 50
                  Quote: Stas157
                  The whole world is only pulling out from cheaper oil.

                  In the short term, yes.
                  Quote: Stas157
                  The United States as a whole, too.

                  Watching which side to look.
                  Quote: Stas157
                  The biggest damage is done by SA and Russia.

                  In the short term, yes.
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Why ruin yourself

                  Nobody is ruining himself - this is an endurance war and there will be a winner, and this is the most important thing in the long run. In a fight, both get bruises, but the strongest wins.
                  It's time to understand that the world is changing and changing under the new world order when something collapses and a new one is built. That's just all of us (like the goyim) were instilled with the opinion that the new world order will be built from the globalists and that the guys don't have to resist and lie down as you are told, but it turned out to be a fantasy and wishlist of our "partners" and "assistants".
                  In fact, the new world order will be built differently and differently and everything will be OK (I found out).
                5. -1
                  21 March 2020 12: 05
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Whole world only rips out from cheaper oil

                  good laughing good ... to tears... laughing

                  What are you doing, wicked request

                  PS: by the way, Freud's reservation. Consumption has already fallen, and production is increasing. The same Saudi - already problems with storage of the mined, and the rental of tankers has already doubled in price ... we stock up on small fish, we observe winked
                6. -5
                  22 March 2020 17: 40
                  to give away non-renewable mineral resources for free?
                  Russia is an energy appendage of the West. The USSR also boycotted the Opekovsky agreement on reducing production and drove crude oil to Europe. 50 years have passed since the 70s and nothing has changed
                7. +3
                  22 March 2020 20: 40
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Quote: Creedco
                  And I think, Saudi Arabia is not a country with which it is worth speaking on equal terms
                  Then we must declare war and force peace ...
                  ... The faster Russia and the SA agree ...
                  The United States as a whole - too ...

                  Damage to all participants. Russia is smaller than the rest, because it’s ready and does not shoot at idle. The point is to agree, and the sooner the better, but on the terms of the Russian Federation. This is a compulsion to peace, or rather a deal, on terms that the Russian Federation considers fair. And the fair conditions are that the United States is now a major oil exporter and should just as well take part in restricting production and exports, together with the Russian Federation and the CA, if they want to support prices. Well, at the same time a little cool young, but hot prince.
              2. +9
                21 March 2020 09: 55
                Little of. Saudis throw Russia - this is a bonus. Firstly, to the course of Islam, which will dominate in the SA the kidnapping of “infidels” is happiness. Secondly, the entire CA establishment is firmly (through loot) connected with the West, with the United States in the first place. The Saudis want to play an honest game with us, they instantly put in the pose of a beaver. They understand that.
                1. +4
                  21 March 2020 18: 41
                  Quote: Okolotochny
                  Saudis throw Russia is a bonus

                  get out of such a bonus !!! wink laughing
              3. 0
                21 March 2020 23: 13
                Quote: Creedco
                And I think, Saudi Arabia is not a country with which it is worth speaking on an equal footing if they are in a brazen rod against us. It upsets me that the Hussites still haven’t got modern weapons. Anyway, for a long time there was no revolution there ...

                Yes, no rushing SA against us. Russia and the SA together suppress US shale. The process has already begun.
            2. +3
              21 March 2020 12: 59
              When we reduce production with the Saudis, the Americans occupy this volume in the market, and since the Saudis are long-standing allies of the United States, then ... so do not cut badly and cut badly by the same amount. But if you do not cut back, the partners who started this war will get sick. The smartest one will not be the one to give in (turn the other cheek?), But the one who will bomb the Saudis nafig, when the fucking sheikhs return to their camels with oil, everything will be fine.
            3. -3
              21 March 2020 13: 06
              You are a liar and an enemy, and if my will were to answer in all severity of the Criminal Code. It was the Saudis who proposed to increase the price of oil in the UNILATERAL ORDER!, Which de facto meant partially to leave the market.
            4. +8
              21 March 2020 18: 05
              Quote: Stas157
              Russia and Arabia fill the low market with free oil (from Russia's supply).
              The situation - two rams on the bridge can’t part.

              Drive each other into a crisis for the amusement of others. The smartest will be the one who first gives in to the fool. You need to be able to cut losses and not generate further ones.

              By the way, Western experts are pleased to note that if the situation continues, then very soon in order to sell oil it will be necessary to pay extra to the buyer. Since everyone even has storages full of free oil.

              study the material better ... otherwise we are glad to listen to everything that is against Russia ... but you don’t perceive normal anything !!! fool laughing

              Today, Saudi Arabia and Iraq said they could not provide an early declared discount. This is due to the fact that due to the fall in demand for black gold in Europe and Asia, the extracted oil simply has nowhere to store. Accordingly, supertankers that carry Arab oil began to be used as reservoirs.
              Most tankers are already full, and there are no customers on them yet. In connection with this situation, the rate on freight of tankers has increased recently by 700% - from $ 30 thousand per day to $ 250 thousand / day.

              https://zen.yandex.ru/media/dvinsy/rossiia-nachinaet-pobejdat-v-neftianoi-voine-5e74a7a0f702ae63facf06d8?&utm_campaign=dbr
            5. +2
              21 March 2020 23: 11
              Quote: Stas157
              Russia and Arabia fill the low market with free oil (from Russia's supply).
              The situation - two rams on the bridge can’t part.

              Drive each other into a crisis for the amusement of others. The smartest will be the one who first gives in to the fool. You need to be able to cut losses and not generate further ones.

              By the way, Western experts are pleased to note that if the situation continues, then very soon in order to sell oil it will be necessary to pay extra to the buyer. Since everyone even has storages full of free oil.

              Stas, you have the unique ability to say stupid things with clever words.
          2. +3
            21 March 2020 09: 51
            I do not have them (they have). There is one sentence - Katz offers to give up)))
          3. +4
            21 March 2020 10: 07
            Quote: Creedco
            Do you have any specific suggestions?

            Well, he, apparently like Katz, offers to give up ...
            One thing I can say is that this is not about Russia or Saudi Arabia. This is such an "unobtrusive", purely "Trump" invitation from the United States to the negotiating table on the issue of oil production quotas, that's all.
          4. +1
            21 March 2020 19: 31
            Katz offers to give up ..
        2. +15
          21 March 2020 07: 42
          Yes, yes, we are. We’ll do it and will not wipe our ass, so that we do not consider it weakness

          Well, sit on your "nezalezhnoy" and do not meddle on our VO. am
        3. bar
          +16
          21 March 2020 07: 57
          Katz once again offers to give up. But the problem is that Asians, sensing slack, will trample us into the ground. You cannot negotiate with them, just push.
        4. -4
          21 March 2020 08: 22
          So go to your banderlogy and there crow.
        5. +1
          21 March 2020 08: 24
          The Russian people will have to check all these conclusions of the American analytechhof on the stress resistance of the Russian economy in their own skin.
          1. +2
            21 March 2020 08: 36
            Malyuta, didn't you live in Russia in the 90s? All some nonsense you are talking about. The Americans wanted to pump their "shale" with the reduction of oil in Russia, but it didn’t work out and it wasn’t necessary to bark at Putin, they don’t like him in the West, and therefore he does everything right and in order not to see this one must be a moron or even worse, a liberal.
            1. +8
              21 March 2020 09: 13
              Quote: ML-334
              Malyuta, didn’t you live in Russia in the 90s? You’re talking all kind of nonsense.

              Carry a blizzard is your prerogative with evening M.
              Quote: ML-334
              The Americans wanted to pump their "shale" with the reduction of oil in Russia but did not work

              Loss of the shale market for mattresses is like a pellet for an elephant, it ranges from 0,5 to 1% percent, moreover, you can afford to subsidize this industry or simply preserve shale mining.
              And I remind you that in Soviet times, oil prices fell to 6-8 dollars without any shale.
              You haters are poorly aware of the fact that the Saudis can easily increase their daily oil production and stupidly squeeze the Russian Federation out of traditional markets, while not losing the total revenue to the budget, they will take volumes, but the Russian Federation works almost at the limit of possibilities and Only people with low social responsibility and low below 50 Aykew can compete in prices with the Saudis.
              Quote: ML-334
              you don’t have to bark at Putin, they don’t like him in the West, and therefore he is doing everything right, and in order not to see this, you have to be a moron or worse, a liberal.

              Well, let's start with the fact that Putin calls himself the most important liberal, his mustachioed gunman constantly broadcasts about this, and in your gradations liberals are liberals and which one is better / worse is for you to understand.
              In addition, I absolutely do not give a damn about who, where and how he loves / dislikes Putin, I can only state one thing that the sympathy for this citizen in the Russian Federation is greatly exaggerated in your head.
              Stop charging three-liter cans of water from the TV, and even so close to trouble.
              1. 0
                24 March 2020 15: 30
                And you take off a saucepan worse than a liberal, only a lad with a saucepan on his head spewing guano not from a dupa but from his mouth. Unlike yours, ours is definitely not a sucker, and he proved this by putting your parsley in a stall and your sidekick Erdogash, your master is on the way because of a "puddle" to remove sanctions.
            2. -4
              21 March 2020 09: 23
              Quote: ML-334
              Malyuta, didn’t you live in Russia in the 90s? Everything is somehow you are talking nonsense.

              You seem to have lived there alone. Tell me how scary!

              Quote: ML-334
              Americans wanted download your "slate"

              You need to answer simple questions:

              - Will the "shale" be killed by the oil war?
              - who more losing in a situation of low oil prices?

              Let me tell you, in general, the United States, even in a slight plus, remains from cheap oil (unlike Russia)! The USA is the largest consumer of oil in the world. Shale is bad, but all other industries are good.
              1. +2
                21 March 2020 13: 39
                Quote: Stas157
                You need to answer simple questions:

                - Will the "shale" be killed by the oil war?
                It will not be killed, but in a state of deep dystrophy it will be driven for a long time.
                Quote: Stas157
                - Who loses more in a situation of low oil prices?

                If simplified, it is understood as something like this; - Our budget is calculated on the basis of the cost of a barrel of $ 40, and the Saudis - from the cost of $ 60. When oil drops to 15 green rubles, we need to report 40 rubles from the reserves to the budget of 25, and 45 rubles to the Saudis to their budget 60. Do you notice the difference? At the same time, Russia's reserves are 200 billion more than that of the SA. So, objectively, S. Arabia can be promoted. The ability to cover the shortfall in the volume of currency with the amount of oil is also limited due to the fact that at some point the supply will exceed the demand. So we will have to sit down at the negotiating table and seek consensus to meet the interests of both parties. In the meantime, this idiot will last, CA and RF will receive a bonus in the form of "tired" slate.
                1. +12
                  21 March 2020 14: 50
                  Quote: Nyrobsky
                  If simplified, it is understood as something like this; - Our budget is calculated based on the cost of a barrel of $ 40, and for the Saudis from the cost of $ 60. When oil falls to 15 green rubles, we need to report 40 rubles from the reserves of 25 rubles, and the Saudis 45 rubles to their budget of 60. Do you notice the difference? At the same time, Russia's reserves are 200 billion more than the CA. So objectively, S. Arabia may be in the promotion

                  Where do you get such info from? From the drain tanks? evening M.?
                  For you personally 1) The amount of the stabilization fund is approx. equal to the debts of companies, under the guarantee of the state vAF
                  2) Mining companies are subject to the so-called flexible holding system, i.e. the lower the world oil price, the less the miners pay on a budget
                  3) the price of oil is of little concern to the producers themselves, they will take their margins, but the budget will remain with a hole.
                  4) The stabilization fund has already begun to be taken for the purchase of Sberbank from themselves. What other operations are carried out with the stabilization fund is a mystery for the 146th seals.
                  5) The crisis in the oil market provoked the Russian Federation itself !!!
                  And now the most important thing!
                  On Thursday I refueled 92nd gasoline at 42,7, and today at 45,2 at Lukoil !!!

                  and now the question is, who will be minus the oil war, are we citizens of the Russian Federation or citizens of the SA ????
                  Maybe it finally comes to you that they’re climbing into your pocket or not ?, we will hold on to the name of Sechin, Miller and the bourgeoisie! Om-yum!
                  1. -7
                    21 March 2020 15: 02
                    Quote: Malyuta
                    flexible system ofcrapshenia

                    good laughing good ... according to Freud, according to Freud ... laughing

                    Ecuy, I’ll get along here, dear Yes
                  2. +5
                    21 March 2020 19: 36
                    Anyone who knows little will judge soon.
                  3. +3
                    21 March 2020 19: 50
                    Quote: Malyuta
                    Where do you get such info from? From the drain tanks? evening M.?

                    First of all, smart guy, take it as a rule - "Don't be rude, but you will be unhappy"
                    Secondly, do not transfer your personal habits of rummaging through the drain tanks and garbage cans to the audience. What can you do if I have grown only to the drain tank? Well, it’s not possible for me to go down to your level and scoop out of the intake bag.
                    Thirdly, in this particular case, I operate with the data of the article and expressed my understanding within the framework of the question asked by my colleague "Stas 157". I see you are different - what's the problem? I do not impose my opinion on you.
                    Quote: Malyuta
                    And now the most important thing!
                    On Thursday I refueled 92nd gasoline at 42,7, and today at 45,2 at Lukoil !!!

                    From which vegetable did you decide that your price claims for Lukoil's gas stations, in relation to other problems that the Russians are facing, have become the most important for everyone?
                    Quote: Malyuta
                    and now the question is, who will be minus the oil war, are we citizens of the Russian Federation or citizens of the SA ????
                    And plagiarize almost the same question that was already voiced by "Stas 157"
                    - Who loses more in a situation of low oil prices?
                    Is this your hobby? My answer will be the same as before. Saudi Arabia will remain in the promotion. Your jumps at gas stations with hands sechin in the pockets of the layman, they did not convince me otherwise. And yet yes, that’s what mattresses write about the stabilization fund and the debts of companies under the guarantees of the Russian Federation
                    An additional plus is that Russia has “huge financial reserves with more than modest external debt.”
                    and even before the heap
                    Russia has more chances to get out of the crisis without any problems in the economy than Saudi Arabia.
                    Have you ever tried to read and comprehend the article?
                    1. +5
                      21 March 2020 22: 20
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      Nyrobsky (Dmitry)


                      Citizen Nyrobsky! I am very sorry, but where, and in which place of my comment did you see the hamsvo allowed by me? I would like to hear.
                      But your snobbery, mentor tone, aggressive writing style and undisguised rudeness, most likely expose you in an unseemly light.
                      I remember that this is not your first passage addressed to me, when you, together with a certain "clover" or "kleber", tried to enroll me in the Western statesmen of the agents of the State Department, but made it funny to me. Now re-read all your comments and try to comprehend them. The first two points we omit your boorish hysteria, but we delve into the third
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      Thirdly, in this particular case I operate on article data

                      What the hell could you draw from two scanty quotes from the original sources that were scribbled by some kind of scribble?
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      Our budget is based on the cost of a barrel of $ 40, while the Saudis have a cost of $ 60. When oil falls to 15 green rubles, we need to report 40 rubles from the reserves of 25 rubles, and the Saudis 45 rubles to their budget of 60. Do you notice the difference? At the same time, Russia's reserves are 200 billion more than the CA. So objectively, S. Arabia may be in the promotion. The ability to cover currency shortages with oil is also limited due to the fact that at some point supply will exceed demand

                      Therefore, I ask you to find out where you are getting the info from? But besides baby talk with an attempt to humiliate your opponent to increase .... ugh you .. why did I write so much? It was easier to send to hell, one fick will not get anything. Next time I will write to you very clearly, clearly and perfectly for you, so that there are no misunderstandings !.
                      1. -1
                        21 March 2020 22: 29
                        Quote: Nyrobsky
                        Our budget is based on the cost of a barrel of $ 40, and the Saudis from the cost of $ 60

                        Quote: Malyuta
                        Therefore, I ask to ask you where you get info?

                        The fact that you are "very interested" is commendable, but why yell like that? belay laughing

                        Kamrad Nyrobsky was a little mistaken - not 60, but 80:

                        Given that the national currency — the riyal — in Saudi Arabia is fixed and held by the central bank at 3,75 riyal per dollar, the royal family needs oil in the range of 80 to 85 dollars per barrel to reduce the budget, estimates IMF chief economist for the Middle East Jihad Azur


                        Enlighten Yes
                2. +5
                  21 March 2020 18: 45
                  Quote: Nyrobsky
                  and the Saudis out of the cost of $ 60.

                  out of 80 !!! wink
                  1. +3
                    21 March 2020 19: 59
                    Quote: Nikolai Grek
                    Quote: Nyrobsky
                    and the Saudis out of the cost of $ 60.

                    out of 80 !!! wink

                    Especially. So they will be exhaled even faster than I expected hi
                    1. +2
                      21 March 2020 20: 22
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      Quote: Nikolai Grek
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      and the Saudis out of the cost of $ 60.

                      out of 80 !!! wink

                      Especially. So they will be exhaled even faster than I expected hi

                      so someone, and the Saudis would not try to compete with Russia ... I also found a scientific power !! wassat lol
                3. -1
                  21 March 2020 22: 44
                  Quote: Nyrobsky
                  Our budget is based on the cost of the barrel 40 dollars, and the Saudis from the cost of 60 dollars. If the oil falls to 15 green rubles, we need to report 40 rubles from the reserves to the budget 25, and the Saudis 45 rubles to their budget 60. Do you notice the difference? At the same time, Russia's reserves are 200 billion more than the CA. So objectively, S. Arabia may be in the promotion.

                  You are not writing about oil now, but about how many losses the Russian budget can sustain. And trying to prove that the budget of the SA can withstand less. Maybe you are right. But I wrote about something else. How much do Russia and SA lose from each barrel of oil sold, and how much as a whole of the total. According to Western economists, Russia is losing almost twice as much as SA. I have not seen the estimates of Russian economists.
                  1. +3
                    21 March 2020 23: 43
                    Quote: Stas157

                    You are not writing about oil now, but about how many losses the Russian budget can sustain. And trying to prove that the budget of the SA can withstand less. Maybe you are right. But I wrote about something else. How much Russia and SA are losing from each barrel of oil sold and how much as a whole in total on volume. According to Western economists, Russia is losing almost twice as much as SA. I have not seen the estimates of Russian economists.

                    If we take into account the fact that the production cost of the Saudis is $ 20 per barrel, and in Russia it is $ 40, then, as it were, in terms of profitability (today there are 27 barrels), the Saudis still have nothing to lose and have $ 7 in the black, while we have $ 13 in minus. Here we are in the promo. This is cost effective. If we take the pros and cons for each side with an eye on filling and executing the budget, then here we (with a budget of 40) have the same minus 13 dollars, while the Saudis (with a budget, as colleagues corrected at 80) already have a negative 53 dollars. The Saudis are already in promot. It is possible to reduce, as they say, "debit with credit" either by increasing the volume of sales, or by covering the difference from the gold and foreign exchange reserves. In the first case, market oversaturation will lead to a decrease in prices below the cost price even for the CA, which in turn will lead to an even greater withdrawal of funds from the reserve. In principle, both sides walk along the edge and wait for who will blink first. Then the mattresses began to ventilate the topic to create an alliance with the Saudis in opposition to Russia, which is bad. I wonder if our analysts considered such an alignment as possible when they went to break the deal? Along the way, only the indefatigable Houthi guys can adjust these plans.
                    1. +2
                      21 March 2020 23: 52
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      If we take the pros and cons for each side with an eye to filling and executing the budget, then here (with a budget of 40) we have the same minus 13 dollars, despite the fact that the Saudis (with a budget, as colleagues corrected at 80) already have a minus 53 dollars

                      Before breeding this kind of math, it might be worthwhile first to cite, for example, the volumes of the Saudi budget and its structure. And compare it with the Russian one. It is quite possible that it will turn out as if in imperishable ...while fat grow thin, skinny-die
                      And then to write from the ceiling all these debits / credits, not even with a pitchfork
                      1. +1
                        21 March 2020 23: 55
                        Quote: Liam
                        maybe you should first give for example the volume of the Saudi budget and its structure. And compare with the Russian

                        So bring that bothers you?

                        Quote: Liam
                        It is quite possible that it will turn out as if in imperishable ...

                        Or maybe it won’t work out ... they said - go ahead, the initiative, as you know, ahem ... loves the initiator Yes
            3. -10
              21 March 2020 09: 25
              Quote: ML-334
              therefore everything is doing right and in order not to see this one has to be a moron or worse liberal.

              You are fighting the Coronovirus so far, since you already have a team!
              1. +1
                21 March 2020 16: 29
                Finally, they found the vaccine.
            4. -4
              24 March 2020 10: 28
              Do you think he is loved very much in Russia?
          2. +5
            21 March 2020 19: 41
            Quote: Malyuta
            The Russian people will have to check all these conclusions of the American analytechhof on the stress resistance of the Russian economy in their own skin.

            We are all in one skin here, but it looks like you have been allocated a place in it at its final point. Hence the moan and tears. Bear with a friend, otherwise you will become a traitor to the Russian land. Yes
            1. +1
              21 March 2020 23: 54
              Quote: Rusland
              We are all in one skin here, but it looks like you have been allocated a place in it at its final point. Hence the moan and tears

              Have you experimentally determined where this very skin starts, where is the end, or did you go all this glorious way from end to beginning? Or from beginning to end, or maybe you are moving in a circle, then this is a completely incomprehensible food chain for me. And so, spinning tirelessly with that trial, but there are no traitors, right? After all, everything your own, dear, inspired? And there are no tantrums, these, damn tears, it's just a weather forecast
        6. +3
          21 March 2020 09: 01
          Panchenko Nikolay - send toilet paper? ? And, why are you talking about YOURSELF write WE, as if you are the emperor of Russia? Have you really decided to write on behalf of all of Russia? And who authorized you to this then?
        7. The comment was deleted.
          1. -2
            21 March 2020 09: 55
            The closeness of some comrades is striking who, having heard enough of Kisel-Soloviev TV, believe that Russia, having not signed an agreement with the Arabs on oil, has thus not shot itself in the foot, but at least in this way will “kill” shale oil in the United States. but as a maximum it will do away with the United States. Well, it is clear that they do not even have a close idea of ​​what the United States and its economy really are, this is understandable - if you listen to the mantra on the deputy every day that the United States is "breathing in fancy", "is about to bend" , "the dollar will soon collapse", "Yellowstone will explode", "The United States is holding on to the banking sector and the dollar does not produce anything and buys everything from China," work in market conditions, but you sit on a "military pension" "for length of service", and therefore you don't care about everything else - you know that every month your pension "for length of service" is dripping into your wallet and will drip, -for the collapsing economy of the country, so this is nonsense, it does not concern me, let them somehow, somehow, get out. But look how bad America is! And this is the main point! Let the entire population in Russia go bankrupt, lose its last pants, but how bad it will be for America! They are like those "roguly" from an old anecdote who found and dug up an old cast-iron cannon from the time of Catherine in the garden and decided to shoot from outside Moscow. They stuffed it with gunpowder, shoved a stone into the barrel, pointed it in the direction where, in their opinion, Moscow is located and brought the wick to the seed hole - the cannon shot and exploded into pieces - someone was killed, someone was crippled. There are two crippled rogules in the hospital, and one says to the other: "Bach Mikola, the yak crashed, the skillets of the choloviks were knocked around?" And the second responded "Aha ... So the tsezh is in us, but the Muscovites are afraid! ..." ...
            1. +1
              21 March 2020 14: 13
              they don’t even imagine what the USA and its economy really are

              GDP in "developed" countries is bloated. I know from my own experience. It is possible to compare (with a big stretch) only by PPP.
            2. +2
              21 March 2020 18: 47
              Quote: Snail N9
              Striking is the nearness of individual comrades who, having heard from Kisel-Soloviev TV, consider

              what I wonder who you heard enough of and think ?? !!! wassat laughing
          2. +6
            21 March 2020 10: 19
            Your training manual is out of date. Both eggs and seed are produced in Russia. Yandex to help. Broiler chickens are even produced on Sakhalin.
            1. -3
              21 March 2020 14: 01
              I always write the truth. Therefore, do not talk about the beautiful present. We know what it is.
              Cit. The share of imported seed potatoes and seeds of sugar beet hybrids is 80% and 98%, respectively, on the Russian market, the head of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation Dmitry Patrushev said at a meeting in Vladikavkaz.
              “The breeding and genetic material of broiler poultry farming in Russia is imported from us in full, a similar situation has developed with us for a number of other types of raw materials and food products. End of quote.
              So it's time to throw you your training manual.
            2. -4
              21 March 2020 14: 06
              According to the Director of the Department of Scientific and Technological Policy and Education of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia Vladimir Avdeenko, import dependence on seeds of vegetables reaches 47%, on forage crops - up to 90%, in breeding and nursery of fruit, berry and nut crops - up to 70%.
            3. -3
              21 March 2020 14: 12
              Chairman of the Federation Council Valentina Matvienko criticized the situation with the production of domestic seeds. According to her, the industry is “completely ruined”, and the Ministry of Agriculture is not taking the necessary measures. She drew attention to the fact that Russia is dependent on foreign partners in this area, and agricultural products are mainly grown from imported seeds.
        8. +1
          21 March 2020 19: 08
          Quote: Pashhenko Nikolay
          And so it is interesting at whose expense the next war will be? Sechin? Miller? I think the question is rhetorical. For yours as well.

          Dear, have we started this war? Do you offer little hands up and go back to substitute mattresses? So this is apparently your life credo, but certainly not the majority of citizens of the Russian Federation.
          The war did not start yesterday, and not even 50 years ago, but much earlier. This oil war is only one part of the global war with us. Or have you been in a coma for the past 30 years that you still can’t tear your eyes out? Well then, not to VO, but to the orderlies.
      2. +4
        21 March 2020 20: 39
        Quote: Mouse
        The Russians do not give up!

        For Putin, for Sechin for Zolotov’s dacha! In the attack on shale oil until the last Russian URAYAYAYA !!!!


      3. -1
        22 March 2020 21: 36
        Quote: Mouse
        The Russians do not give up!

        and the point is to arrange war if you are not going to win ?!
    2. +1
      21 March 2020 07: 06
      Let's see who is who! Here I read an interview with Sechin, he said that the cost of oil production in Russia is $ 3'5 .... I was really surprised by these words! recourse So I think she’s soft soldier
      1. +3
        21 March 2020 07: 11
        Quote: Popuas
        Let's see who is who! Here I read an interview with Sechin, he said that the cost of oil production in Russia is $ 3'5 .... I was really surprised by these words! recourse So I think she’s soft soldier

        So the dollar today is 13 times cheaper than under Stalin. our prime cost of oil will always be high with low quality. geography, geology do not have
        1. bar
          +8
          21 March 2020 08: 01
          our prime cost of oil will always be high with low quality. geography, geology do not have

          No luck with the country? We have the majority of agriculture in the risky farming zone. But nothing, they somehow managed to provide themselves with grain. It’s also a sin to complain about natural resources
          1. +2
            21 March 2020 11: 14
            Quote: bar
            It’s also a sin to complain about natural resources

            Natural resources is also the merit of Putin ?! belay
            1. -3
              21 March 2020 11: 18
              Quote: Malyuta
              Quote: bar
              It’s also a sin to complain about natural resources

              Natural resources is also the merit of Putin ?! belay

              Well, you know very well that Putin did not, cannot and cannot have merit. Basically, he spoils you under the door, but he has no more merit laughing
              1. +6
                21 March 2020 22: 44
                In the recollections of this citizen’s childhood, there is a curious detail that they liked to run into the trolley / bus with the roots and spoil the air there and laugh, to run away, such a pastime of these wonderful kids was very amusing, but we were all from childhood ....
                PySy. I’m looking at you and wondering how you can first scroll through the entire site, then yourself on the site and enjoy it. How do you do this ... just an unearthly talent.
                1. -4
                  21 March 2020 22: 46
                  Quote: Malyuta
                  PySy. I look at you and wonder ...

                  ... I told you about "oil for $ 80 for Saudi" a reference, you look at it better, wonder.

                  And your opinion of me doesn’t bother me at all request
                  1. +3
                    21 March 2020 23: 31
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    I told you there about "oil for $ 80 for Saudi" a link threw, you look at it better, wonder.

                    Are you also at the door ?! If you are ahead or vice versa, then you can’t pick it up anymore, everything is rotten, only the sanitary treatment, you yourself understand, belay pandemic!
                    Once again, I apologize, but I didn’t express opinions about you, even evaluative ones, I was simply surprised ...., sorry again, that cut you off from important matters hi
                    1. -3
                      21 March 2020 23: 34
                      Quote: Malyuta
                      picking up is no longer possible, everything is rotten, only sanitization

                      Yes, after talking with people like you, it is sometimes necessary Yes

                      But, the matter of time, as they say ... proceed to the budget of Saudi, laid out for oil at $ 80 - 85. When the material is assimilated, go wink
            2. +5
              21 March 2020 13: 31
              Quote: Malyuta
              Quote: bar
              It’s also a sin to complain about natural resources

              Natural resources is also the merit of Putin ?! belay

              No, this is a gift of God. Natural resources were before Putin, there is under Putin, and will be after Putin. By the way, a clip about natural resources
              1. +3
                21 March 2020 13: 59
                Quote: Vladimir_6
                No, it's a gift of God. The reserves of natural resources were before Putin, there is under Putin, and will be after Putin

                What was and is is a fact, but the fact that this company can pump a lot of things, dig it out, cut it out and sell it out is also a fact!
                And it may turn out that when people wake up from the zombie MOROC, our children and grandchildren will have holes from wells, swampy stumps instead of taiga, lunar landscapes instead of quarries and mines, smelly swamps instead of rivers and lakes and dirty stinky radioactive garbage in all territories of a once-great country.
              2. +1
                21 March 2020 23: 00
                The example of Norway does not tell you anything.
            3. -1
              21 March 2020 14: 26
              Yes, yes, as winter passed during the USSR, summer came, thanks n ..... for that, and according to some, everything is good from the president.
        2. +3
          21 March 2020 09: 58
          Do you know the exchange rate for what happened under Stalin ??? Announce. The data of the newspapers Izvestia, Truth not to cite.
      2. +4
        21 March 2020 07: 21
        Sorry $ 3'1 per barrel! And with current production, without exploring new fields, Russia can pump for 22 years ... belay Ufff ... if not bluffing angry
        1. 0
          21 March 2020 08: 00
          Why do you measure the dollar in inches or minutes? wink
          So all the same 3,10 or 31 bucks?
          1. +3
            21 March 2020 08: 03
            May it be to you ... smile realized that they were faulting the comma
        2. +7
          21 March 2020 08: 01
          he doesn’t bluff ... he just lies ...
          of easily added oil, with a profitability of production of 3-5 bucks per barrel, we have only about 25% and this does not include refining, pumping with delivery to refineries or terminals ... the rest is from the category of hard-to-recover formations ... and the prime cost is completely different there. ..
          and for 22 years to download already explored, you need a robust investment so ...
          1. +1
            21 March 2020 08: 05
            Bluffing and lying aren’t the same thing ... recourse as they say for what I bought, for that I sell ... hi and yes, read my first comment No.
          2. +11
            21 March 2020 08: 07
            In the light of recent events, when it turned out that not only oil workers, but also tanker owners want to be rich, perhaps it makes sense to consider the cost of oil not at the derrick, but at transfer to the consumer?
            1. +13
              21 March 2020 09: 53
              Quote: Mitroha
              but also the owners of the tankers,

              However, the freight jumped slightly. fellow Further, pure mathematics with the consequences:
              Today, Saudi Arabia and Iraq said they could not provide an early declared discount. This is due to the fact that due to the fall in demand for black gold in Europe and Asia, the extracted oil simply has nowhere to store. Accordingly, supertankers that carry Arab oil began to be used as reservoirs.
              Most tankers are already full, and there are no customers on them yet. In connection with this situation, the rate on freight of tankers has increased recently by 700% - from $ 30 thousand per day to $ 250 thousand / day.
              Now let's calculate the economy. Brent is currently trading around $ 30 per barrel. One supertanker holds about 2 million barrels of oil. This is about 60 million dollars. The announced Saudi discount is $ 8, that is, the cost of the tanker is $ 44 million. Thus, the buyer would save $ 16 million from one supertanker. But not so simple.
              The way from the Persian Gulf to Europe is plus or minus 25-30 days. At the current freight rate - 7.5 million dollars instead of 900 thousand earlier. However, the tanker must make the return trip. This is another 7.5 million dollars. Total - 15 million dollars.
              It turns out that the announced discount of $ 16 million is completely leveled by the cost of logistics.
              Plus, European buyers are forced to bear the costs associated with the transshipment of black gold in the port and delivery to the refinery. It turns out that the proposal for Arab oil is not more profitable than Russian.
              In this regard, buyers cancel the previously concluded contracts with Saudi Arabia, because they can not bear such costs for the payment of logistics.
              But the main consequence of this whole story is different. In current conditions, Saudi Arabia is not able to increase oil production to the declared 12.3 million barrels / day. No, of course, it can technically do it without problems, but nobody will simply buy this oil. There is no more storage space either. Therefore, what to do with it is not clear.
          3. -2
            21 March 2020 08: 13
            You can’t post such info here, they told you that we have a profitability of $ 3,5.
          4. +3
            21 March 2020 08: 32
            Quote: kepmor
            and for 22 years to download already explored, you need a robust investment so ...

            But you must admit that sucking oil from prospecting fields is still cheaper than exploring and exploring new ones.
        3. +2
          21 March 2020 09: 12
          Papuan
          Sechin does not bluff.
          By the way, in the technology of oil production, RUSSIA is ahead of the * planet *, and therefore the figures are the same in cost.
          1. +2
            21 March 2020 09: 38
            a bankrupt BP after a spill in a gulf of a fine of 40 billion rubles is drilled for the Russian Federation at the same Prilazlomnaya. horizontal drilling up to 7km horizontally pipe technology lubricant cutters all from there
      3. +4
        21 March 2020 08: 29
        Quote: Popuas
        Here I read an interview with Sechin, he said that the cost of oil production in Russia is $ 3'5 .... I was really surprised by these words!

        Sechin, as is customary at the top, always lies in everything. Russian oil can’t cost 3,5 bucks NIKAK, patamushta, it is difficult to extract, it is located far away, it’s called shoulder, and there’s a lot of sulfur in it. the range of 15-25 dollars.
      4. LMN
        +2
        21 March 2020 09: 54
        Quote: Popuas
        Let's see who is who! Here I read an interview with Sechin, he said that the cost of oil production in Russia is $ 3'5 .... I was really surprised by these words! recourse So I think she’s soft soldier

        Tatneft CEO Nail Maganov said the company is ready to continue production at a cost of oil of $ 8 per barrel. He said this before a meeting of representatives of the country's oil company with the head of the Russian Ministry of Energy Alexander Novak, TASS reports.

        hi
        Another issue is that the price varies by region.
    3. +2
      21 March 2020 07: 09
      To this "pregnant" prYnets hands up to the elbows in blood (dismembered journalist). How else to say hello to this? Grand politician, however!
      1. -2
        21 March 2020 08: 14
        Well then, handshakes in the world, unless the pope and the warmed togger remain ...
    4. +16
      21 March 2020 07: 29
      In response to Trump's accusations against Russia and Saudi Arabia, the Kremlin said that it "understands the problems of American shale producers."
      1. +2
        21 March 2020 08: 17
        "understands the problems of American shale producers."
        And even condole them)
        1. +1
          21 March 2020 08: 36
          Quote: Mitroha
          understand the problems of American shale producers

          Yes, it doesn’t matter to us who will remain in the market, the Saudis or the shale, for some of them there is a place.
    5. -3
      21 March 2020 07: 33
      And what kind of external debt do we have? Who should we? Our budget surplus, GDP growth, and the number of US bonds are unrealistic. Do you still have a debt with interest? Which are higher than bond income)

      But we will defeat the Saudis and the rest, it’s without question. The main thing is that the population’s expenditure should not be used, we won’t cost the price. Everything and everything for victory!
      1. -2
        21 March 2020 07: 57
        Quote: Signifer
        And what kind of external debt do we have? Who should we?

        --------------------
        External debt has always been equal to zero, it does not happen, now about $ 480 billion. We owe money to the owners, we give them our money at 3%, and we take from them at 6%. We have the wisest rulers in the world.
        1. Fat
          +4
          21 March 2020 08: 54
          Quote: Altona
          Quote: Signifer
          And what kind of external debt do we have? Who should we?

          --------------------
          External debt has always been equal to zero, it does not happen, now about $ 480 billion. We owe money to the owners, we give them our money at 3%, and we take from them at 6%. We have the wisest rulers in the world.

          Some debts are more beneficial to service than to pay off completely.
          The lender of such borrowers cherishes and cherishes as much as possible, even ready to throw if asked. )))
          This is a truly competent financial policy.
          1. +4
            21 March 2020 09: 18
            to fat
            Well, how can you explain about money to someone who does not have it, but your own opinion about money in someone else’s pocket and especially about the finances of the state * is the most correct *.
            As there (not verbatim), - * it is a pity that all the great politicians and financiers are already working as taxi drivers and waitresses *.
            1. -2
              21 March 2020 09: 31
              Quote: Vasily50
              Well, how can you explain about money to someone who does not have it, but your own opinion about money in someone else’s pocket and especially about the finances of the state * is the most correct *.
              As there (not verbatim), - * it is a pity that all the great politicians and financiers are already working as taxi drivers and waitresses *.

              -----------------------
              Of course, you need to take out all the money from home, like an alcoholic and drink, and then again run to the microfinance organization. This is roughly how Russia behaves, without investing in its own population.
            2. Fat
              +3
              21 March 2020 09: 42
              Quote: Vasily50
              Well, how can you explain about money to someone who does not have it

              Yes, all this is understandable at the household level))))
              Do you have a credit card?
              I don’t have much money, but there is not much credit, I transfer money under the agreement every month. The Bank loves me, 2-3 super offers per month everyone offers to conclude a new agreement with a large limit and all sorts of goodies such as discounts and cashback)))
              No need to be carried on all sorts of lures without urgent need, that's all ...
              This is not any politics, but pure "narrow-minded practicality" (C)
              1. +7
                21 March 2020 10: 07
                Quote: Thick
                The Bank loves me, 2-3 super offers per month everyone offers to conclude a new agreement with a large limit and all sorts of goodies such as discounts and cashback)))

                Before the heap, he also provides some credit holidays - once every six months, with the payment being transferred to the end of the term.
                No need to be carried on all sorts of lures without urgent need, that's all ...
                Especially when the lady from the bank calls and in an unctuous voice, but with pressure begins to broadcast about the "super-mega-offer", practically forcing her to listen. Send right away - polite but firm.Yes
    6. +2
      21 March 2020 07: 39
      "Coronavirus" and "oil war" - at the same time. The world has seen many warriors, but such for the first time. Is this progress, or a regression of civilization? Rather the second. Civilization began to develop in the wrong direction.
      1. +4
        21 March 2020 07: 45
        Quote: askort154
        "Coronavirus" and "oil war" - at the same time. The world has seen many warriors, but such for the first time.

        The fact of the matter is that this is not the first time wars against the background of epidemics and epidemics against the background of wars. Anything in this world has happened ... The same "Spanish woman" during the First World War. And how many all kinds of wars there were in Europe against the background of the plague epidemic. In general, humanity, in fact, does not change.
        1. 0
          21 March 2020 08: 01
          Volodin .... But the fact of the matter is that it is not the first time. Anything in this world has happened ... The same "Spanish woman" during the First World War. And how many all kinds of wars there were in Europe against the background of the plague epidemic. In general, humanity, in fact, does not change.

          Previously, epidemics were due to backward life and culture. Now man creates himself, with his own hands, various viruses, both for peaceful purposes and for the military (starting from the 1st World War). Human morality and morality
          greatly altered. Previously, atomic bombs were not tested on the civilian population, but fought with knives. hi
          1. +6
            21 March 2020 08: 06
            Quote: askort154
            Human morality and morality
            greatly altered. Previously, atomic bombs were not tested on the civilian population, but fought with knives.

            If there had been atomic bombs “before”, I have no doubt that they would have been tested on living people too ... And they fought not only with melee weapons, but also, for example, by throwing plague corpses (their fragments) into besieged fortresses. Man to man - friend, comrade and brother - this is only from the works of philosophers-humanists.
            1. 0
              21 March 2020 08: 13
              Volodin ... If there had been atomic bombs "earlier", I have no doubt that they would have been tested on living people.

              That is why I wrote in the first post. Civilization began to develop in the wrong direction.
              And if it continues to "develop" in the same direction, the planet Earth will not withstand such "swinishness" towards it. hi
        2. +7
          21 March 2020 10: 12
          Quote: Volodin
          In general, humanity, in fact, does not change.

          In the end, he has what he deserves. And yes, no one (except for priests and global swindlers) promised humanity that it would be easy. But this is not taken into account, and with enviable constancy a situation arises from the series "There was never and now again." laughing
      2. -1
        21 March 2020 11: 13
        Quote: askort154
        "Coronavirus" and "oil war" - at the same time. The world has seen many warriors, but such for the first time. Is this progress, or a regression of civilization? Rather the second. Civilization began to develop in the wrong direction.

        IMHO. Civilization began to develop in the wrong direction since the collapse of the socialist system. Destroying the USSR, humanity shot itself in the foot
    7. +3
      21 March 2020 07: 43
      "What a pity Bob that your bay one broke her leg." laughing
    8. +1
      21 March 2020 07: 50
      Hussites should be asked, for example, the next attack by the Hussites on the energy infrastructure will result in a breakdown of contractual obligations and huge fines
    9. -5
      21 March 2020 07: 54
      The American edition, knowing the real state of affairs, casts a shadow over the fence. "Huge" gold and foreign exchange reserves can be easily burned up in a couple of months to "maintain the ruble exchange rate" on the stock exchange, that is, enrich some close persons with the subsequent withdrawal of these funds abroad. Russia's external debt is probably modest by their standards, but still about $ 480 billion. Russia survives only thanks to the efforts of the people themselves, and not to some actions of the authorities, which are usually situational and unpromising.
      1. +12
        21 March 2020 08: 08
        Quote: Altona
        ... "Huge" gold and foreign exchange reserves can be easily burned up in a couple of months to "maintain the ruble exchange rate" on the exchange, that is, enrich some close persons with the subsequent withdrawal of these funds

        Over the past 2 weeks, the gold and foreign exchange reserves have grown by 10 billion greens. Up to 580 ... So "reserves are firing, firing" !!!
        IMHO, a tricky move, is already the third time they are repeating. Non-residents are jammed. They want to get out of Russian bonds ... Well, get out. They are ruble. And they need to withdraw money in currency! And the currency has risen in price ... Take to health ... Turbulence on exchanges and quiet down ...
        1. -1
          21 March 2020 08: 10
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          Over the past 2 weeks, the gold and foreign exchange reserves have grown by 10 billion greens. Up to 580 ... So "reserves are firing, firing" !!!

          --------------------
          Do you have something from this? In addition to the collapse of the ruble. You probably have it if you object with such enthusiasm.
          1. -1
            21 March 2020 08: 31
            Quote: Altona
            Do you have something from this? In addition to the collapse of the ruble. You probably have it if you object with such enthusiasm.

            I have. My foreign exchange contracts sharply went up ... in rubles. It’s quite tangible. And if prices in stores remain approximately the same, then my company and I will win. And we are not selling hydrocarbons at all laughing
            1. -3
              21 March 2020 08: 35
              Quote: Mountain Shooter
              I have. My foreign exchange contracts sharply went up ... in rubles. It’s quite tangible.

              ---------------------------
              Well, this is where you have to start, you don’t say which social group you belong to. Your comment is selfish and the old women with a pension of 10800 do not care. I write my comments taking into account the interests of the entire population, and not myself. Personally, I know how to hedge.
              1. +9
                21 March 2020 08: 46
                Quote: Altona
                Well, this is where you have to start, you don’t say which social group you belong to. Your comment is selfish and the old women with a pension of 10800 do not care. I write my comments taking into account the interests of the entire population, and not myself. Personally, I know how to hedge.

                So I have 30 people working at my company. And they have families and children ... Maybe I am doing more for the "interests of the entire population" than a wise opponent who "hedged" from the crisis and worried about old women with a small pension?
                1. +8
                  21 March 2020 08: 55
                  Quote: Mountain Shooter
                  So I have 30 people working at my company. And they have families and children ... Maybe I am doing more for the "interests of the entire population" than a wise opponent who "hedged" from the crisis and worried about old women with a small pension?

                  ------------------------
                  I command 100 people in production, while creating 50 jobs from scratch. These are 4 teams of welders and machine tools. During the work, he personally created 10 new product samples, purchased 7 new pieces of equipment, including 4 CNC machines. Our sales volumes grew 3 times last year, this year already 2 times. Maybe I also do something for the population?
                  1. +4
                    21 March 2020 09: 30
                    Quote: Altona
                    I command 100 people in production, while creating 50 jobs from scratch. These are 4 teams of welders and machine tools. During the work, he personally created 10 new product samples, purchased 7 new pieces of equipment, including 4 CNC machines. Our sales volumes grew 3 times last year, this year already 2 times. Maybe I also do something for the population?

                    And how could this be known? And you are clearly not the owner of the enterprise. And this is another psychology. And another responsibility for decisions.
                    1. +3
                      21 March 2020 09: 38
                      Quote: Mountain Shooter
                      And how could this be known? And you are clearly not the owner of the enterprise.

                      ---------------------------
                      In the sense of finding out? I am the chief engineer of the enterprise. And I am the very first in the key decision-making chain. About risks, my recommendations and about risks are given, don't worry. If the enterprise collapses, then I will also have to scratch my turnips, so everything is in order with responsibility. With the current unemployment, my boat is even more dangerous, because the owner of the enterprise has a psychology akin to your "today you will die, tomorrow I am", the plant does not hurt him and he needs it, you have to think about it, look for specialists, it is easier to buy ready-made on the side.
                      1. +1
                        21 March 2020 09: 42
                        Quote: Altona
                        with responsibility everything is in order. With the current unemployment, my boat is even more dangerous, because the owner of the enterprise has a psychology akin to yours "today you will die, tomorrow I am", the plant does not hurt him and he needs it, this is

                        I’m also a developer. All that my enterprise does. laughing
                        So what about psychology? I have one of the devices that we release on my avatar ...
                        1. +1
                          21 March 2020 09: 46
                          Quote: Mountain Shooter
                          I’m also a developer. All that my enterprise does. laughing
                          So what about psychology? I have one of the devices that we release on my avatar ...

                          ------------------------
                          And I’m a developer of 10 units of production, I wrote, they didn’t surprise me, I get everything negative and positive in full. I wrote above that I myself have developed and are developing products and accessories. About psychology, they answered you, read everything, and not just what you want.
                          PS I am engaged in mounted equipment and walk-behind tractors. Seeders, diggers, planters, mowers and other small-scale mechanization. Now we are trying to increase the quality of products, we release too much, we need to increase the quality and debug product samples.
                        2. +1
                          21 March 2020 10: 08
                          Our products, in particular, improve the quality of metal cutting tools ... Hard coatings, carbo-nitriding ...
                        3. 0
                          21 March 2020 10: 09
                          Quote: Mountain Shooter
                          Our products, in particular, improve the quality of metal cutting tools ... Hard coatings, carbo-nitriding ...

                          ---------------------------
                          Well and good, my products plow the land. What is the question? With metal cutting coatings, this is already to the manufacturer of inserts and cutting tools. This site is not for free advertising of its own products.
                        4. 0
                          21 March 2020 10: 10
                          Quote: Altona
                          Well and good, my products plow the land. What is the question?

                          This is not a question, but a proposal laughing
                        5. +1
                          21 March 2020 10: 15
                          Quote: Mountain Shooter
                          This is not a question, but a proposal

                          -------------------
                          I don’t do cutting tools, although they tried to attract me somehow, but not mine, I’m not a technologist by training, but a mechanical engineer. Although I am engaged in technology, I am more attracted to assembly and welding matters than to cutting ones. We have to delve into this.
                        6. -2
                          21 March 2020 10: 16
                          Quote: Altona
                          my products plow the land

                          Lying again.

                          Find how you cried that winter is snowless and nobody needs your scrapers for snow? It’s very lazy to look, but I’ll find laughing
                      2. -1
                        21 March 2020 10: 21
                        Quote: Altona
                        I am the chief engineer of the enterprise ...

                        ... garage.

                        Quote: Altona
                        my recommendations and risks are given

                        Yeah ... they riveted snow shovels, but the snow didn't go ... "risk analyst" laughing

                        Quote: Altona
                        my recommendations and about risks are given, do not worry

                        In the place of your colleagues - I would definitely worry. Fortunately, I am not in their place Yes
            2. 0
              21 March 2020 09: 25
              Gas masks, respirators, masks ??? ...
              1. -2
                21 March 2020 10: 55
                Gas masks, respirators, masks ??? ...

                Very relevant product at the present time. Although ... you can do this:
        2. -1
          21 March 2020 19: 31
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          Non-residents are jammed. They want to get out of Russian bonds ... Well, get out. They are ruble. And they need to withdraw money in currency! And the currency has risen in price ... Take to health ... Turbulence on exchanges and quiet down ...

          It's too difficult for an expert analyst at Alton request
      2. +2
        21 March 2020 08: 29
        Quote: Altona
        "Huge" gold and foreign exchange reserves can be easily burned up in a couple of months to "maintain the ruble exchange rate" on the stock exchange, that is, enrich some close persons with the subsequent withdrawal of these funds abroad.

        You’re right, as always .. just yesterday I heard on the radio that Russia sold $ 5 billion to maintain the ruble exchange rate ... and that’s in a day ..
    10. +1
      21 March 2020 08: 07
      Why the hell do we give up? Nearly 149 million live oils are available, with an almost inexhaustible margin of safety ...
    11. 0
      21 March 2020 08: 08
      Yuri Podolyak retold one to one.
    12. -4
      21 March 2020 08: 08
      Quote: bar
      Katz once again offers to give up. But the problem is that Asians, sensing slack, will trample us into the ground. You cannot negotiate with them, just push.

      I agree. But so far it turns out to crush only their own. The people need to show concern for him. Then the whole world, as a whole, and not so withstand.
    13. 0
      21 March 2020 08: 12
      America prints dollars. Oil is bought for dollars. The higher the price of oil, the greater the demand for dollars in the world. That is, the higher the price of oil, the better for the United States.
    14. -1
      21 March 2020 08: 16
      I advise you to listen to the latest broadcast of Potapenko and Krutikhin. They are there just discussing the situation with oil.
      1. +3
        21 March 2020 08: 28
        Quote: GRIGORIY76
        I advise you to listen to the latest broadcast of Potapenko and Krutikhin. They are there just discussing the situation with oil.

        -----------------
        Local patriots do not need this, they are so sincerely worried about the oil and gas oligarchs, they are ready to arrange a sweepstakes. I remember that even Putin once said to Sechin in surprise: "I thought Rosneft would work for Russia, but it turns out that Russia is forced to work for Rosneft."
    15. +3
      21 March 2020 08: 17
      Not only the Saudis, but also the United States are now “getting along well” with their shale oil.
      1. +2
        21 March 2020 08: 55
        Quote: Retvizan 8
        Not only the Saudis, but also the United States are now “getting along well” with their shale oil.

        Yes, and it doesn’t matter to us which of them survives - who better offers the conditions, we will agree on that.
        Logically - it is more necessary for the Saudis, the United States as a state will not suffer much - only the shales will be bent.
        1. +2
          21 March 2020 10: 49
          The optimist, however, is Andobor.
      2. -2
        21 March 2020 13: 01
        Quote: Retvizan 8
        Not only the Saudis, but also the United States are now “getting along well” with their shale oil.

        It is not the States that are being "racked", but only the shale producers in the States. But here, as usual, "slaves' foreheads will crackle." At the level of reflexes, I do not trust the Government's statements about full control of the situation.
    16. +2
      21 March 2020 08: 20
      The right decision of the Kremlin. Then it will be more fun))
    17. -1
      21 March 2020 08: 23
      Quote: Guards turn
      Hussites need to ask

      I'm also surprised that the "equipped" cooks are not yet in Yemen ...
    18. +2
      21 March 2020 08: 43
      every time I am worried when they have enough from behind a hill ...
    19. 0
      21 March 2020 08: 44
      But can our Hussites hit Saudis!
      A couple of missiles in the oil terminals by the way will be.
    20. -1
      21 March 2020 08: 50
      Hold on to Russia! Husits ​​will help if that ...
      Quote: Soviet Union
      But can our Hussites hit Saudis!
      A couple of missiles in the oil terminals by the way will be.

      They will check the US air defense, and if they get there, the oil industry will begin to rise again ..
    21. +1
      21 March 2020 08: 59
      It's like with gas and Ukraine .. Until the last, cheeks were puffed up and then quickly everything that was required was signed and even 3 billion were thrown
    22. +6
      21 March 2020 09: 19
      Maybe this is not a war against Russia? And a conspiracy against the US shale?


      ,, Oil prices will be adjusted within six months, by the end of 2020 may return to the level of $ 60 per barrel. This opinion was expressed to journalists by the head of Rosneft Igor Sechin.

      "The market will correct, and I think that it will be quite fast. Within six months we will see those changes in a more stable, correct direction. By the end of the year, I suppose that the price may return to the level of up to $ 60, provided that there is a release of shale oil from the market, "he said.

      “Will investors continue to trust the growth of shale production?” I think not, "said Sechin. ,,
      1. -5
        21 March 2020 09: 22
        What do you think he should say? "Yeah, that's what I got used to, of course."
        So what?
      2. -6
        21 March 2020 09: 43
        Quote: prokvirus
        “Will investors continue to trust the growth of shale production?” I think not, "said Sechin. ,,

        ---------------------
        Sechin is never an oil worker, he is Putin's former secretary. Let him give at least 100500 predictions, as Miller did in his time. They missed the shale revolution, now they have to put on a good face when they play badly. Oil shale can be "turned on" and "turned off", that is, production can be stopped. "Shales" are hedged and may well be bought by Shell and Exxon. This will not work with our Samotlor.
        1. +9
          21 March 2020 09: 55
          ,, Slate can be "turned on" and "turned off", that is, to stop production. ,,

          Downtime costs money everywhere. And considerable.
        2. +2
          21 March 2020 12: 57
          Kindergarten. Nobody "blinded" the shale revolution as such. There is even a Soviet film about shale oil (if I can’t even find a name) in 1952. Shale production is really unprofitable (but I’m not talking about ecology at all) and the fact that it exists is the willful decision of the US government to finance 50% of its production by including a printed and it was done precisely for political reasons. And in this regard, I think all calculations of its profitability are absurd. The existence of shale production is the exclusive will of the US government.
      3. +5
        21 March 2020 10: 50
        ,, The United States became an unwitting victim (oil war - ed.). The mining companies will suffer very seriously ... They are already incurring losses, but they cannot get loans. They are not given money. It will ruin them, "says Amrita Sen of Energy Aspects research firm.
    23. -5
      21 March 2020 10: 08
      Zombie howls began again that "I outplayed everyone, a cunning plan, the Russians are not giving up." Another bulling with the whole world. Better go to the exchangers, get busy. A "stable" wooden one is coming to a kirdyk, as, incidentally, not for the first time in the last 30 years. Oh, I forgot: "Do you want to go to the 90s?"
      PS In the 90s there was no war with Ukraine and industrial enterprises were extinct, of which there are no foundations left now.
      1. +5
        21 March 2020 10: 13
        ,, In the 90s there was no war with Ukraine ,,

        The war was inside Russia (Chechnya). Now the state has strengthened and the war is already outside the country.
        1. -6
          21 March 2020 13: 12
          Quote: prokvirus
          Now the state has strengthened and the war is already outside the country.

          Does it mean that the Slavs are killing each other means "the state has grown stronger"? We used to fight the Chechens and were weak by your logic. Now we have grown stronger and are at war with the Ukrainians. Oh well.
          1. +1
            21 March 2020 14: 57
            “Does it mean that the Slavs are killing each other means“ the state has grown stronger ”? We used to fight the Chechens and were weak by your logic. Now we have grown stronger and are at war with the Ukrainians. Oh well.,,



            Have you heard such a thing as a cold war?
            So it did not end with the collapse of the USSR and will never end. Only the front is carried forward. In the 90s, the front was inside the country in Chechnya. Now the front is outside the country. And the stronger we are, the farther this front will be from our borders.
          2. +1
            21 March 2020 15: 09
            Quote: Old Fuck
            Now we have strengthened and are fighting with the Ukrainians.

            Who are "we" fighting the Ukrainians? Do you personally fight?
      2. -1
        21 March 2020 10: 45
        Whom he and all of them that are tearing the country outplayed is us, the people of Russia. Only now a large part of it does not want to understand yet, everyone hopes for a good king.
      3. -2
        21 March 2020 11: 08
        It was preserved industrial enterprises, from which now there are no foundations.

        What a straightforward pessimist you are. We must be more optimistic and believe in the next HPP of the "solntselikogo", he is not mistaken! .... "unite" with the Rottenberg-Sechins in a single labor impulse, against the insidious Albion and the USA! Let's tighten the belts together! So we will win! And besides, we now have "nano-technologies" in "nano-Skolkovo" together with "nano-Chubais"! They will help us with their developments, while reducing (loss) incomes of the population:
        1. -2
          21 March 2020 11: 15
          Quote: Snail N9
          Snail N9

          Publish a scheme for cutting gastropods, plz. It is clear that clause 8 prevails there, but the details would be, IMHO, not superfluous wink
    24. 0
      21 March 2020 10: 32
      Cheap oil has become a threat to the United States? Is Trump completely crazy? laughing
      1. -3
        21 March 2020 10: 42
        No, Donya is out of her mind. Unlike "ours".
    25. -2
      21 March 2020 10: 41
      His main resource is the people. Squeeze out with the brothers dry.
      1. +1
        21 March 2020 10: 50
        Guard! Fy all Frete! Everything broke off in the house of Smeshalsky laughing
    26. +1
      21 March 2020 10: 53
      There is no price war! You are all frets! The market price is determined by supply and demand. it is an axiom. At the moment, just supply is higher than demand. Naturally, the price of oil is falling. Market, baby, market! and whoever does not fit into the market - according to Yegor’s testament, the light of our Timurovich is in the furnace. (I am personally against this statement) laughing
      1. -1
        21 March 2020 12: 47
        You have a child’s level. You don’t even understand how everything works. Tales about the market are for plebeians.
        1. Fat
          +1
          21 March 2020 22: 18
          Quote: Torak
          You have a child’s level. You don’t even understand how everything works. Tales about the market are for plebeians.

          Yes, yes ... For playboys you need completely different stories ...))))
    27. -7
      21 March 2020 11: 04
      As pro-Kremlin skakuasas like to say, if the West scolds Russia, then we are doing everything right. Here the West praises ...
      1. +1
        21 March 2020 11: 10
        Quote: Gardamir
        Here the West praises ...

        The West, "Gardamir", is going to impose sanctions for the "dropped" oil. So you go by again Yes
      2. +1
        21 March 2020 11: 43
        ,, As pro-Kremlin skakuas like to say, if the West scolds Russia, then we are doing everything right. Here the West praises ... ,,



        ,, US Presidential Administration Donald Trump intends to put pressure on Russia and Saudi Arabia to reduce oil production, March 19, The Wall Street Journal reports. ,,
    28. +1
      21 March 2020 11: 07
      Quote: Man
      we are ours, we will build a new WORLD

      Everything new is a well-forgotten old, and the old is an echo of not only the immediate past, but the distant one when everything was really normal.
    29. +6
      21 March 2020 11: 07
      ,, Russia did not enter this path for the sake of entertainment. Its goals were clearly articulated - to destroy American shale oil - and the costs of this step, both economic and political (including the defeat of Trump in the upcoming presidential election in 2020), were calculated in advance. You can play with a Russian bear for a long time without provoking a response. But now we know what his reaction may be: when the Empire strikes back, it hits very hard. ,,

      Scott Ritter
      1. -5
        21 March 2020 11: 24
        Right now, they slap the embargo and the virus will suck a paw in general
    30. 0
      21 March 2020 11: 10
      the game was equal, played two (censorship), good luck to all of these substances, the main thing is that the rest are not slurred when it all explodes laughing
    31. -2
      21 March 2020 11: 27
      Is it not so that the sheikhs will switch from maseratti to frets? Yes, they are very unhappy to them.
    32. -2
      21 March 2020 11: 35
      The Kremlin regards the position of the Saudi authorities as blackmail, but is confident that Russia has more chances to get out of the crisis without any problems in the economy than Saudi Arabia.

      Correctly regards, but CA has more chances. Their oil costs are lower than in Russia, they have more resources, they are actively luring Russian buyers (which is worth China alone), and most importantly, if the Saudis decide to make concessions, then America will not allow them, they are too dependent on the United States.
      And most importantly, history shows that when the West started such races of attrition (against the USSR and others), they can take temporary losses, if only to put the head of a competitor in a noose and knock out a chair.
      1. 0
        21 March 2020 11: 48
        ,, And most importantly, history shows that when the West started such races of attrition (against the USSR and others), they can go to temporary losses, if only to stick a competitor’s head in a noose and knock out a chair. ,,


        It would be like you say, if not for shale oil.




        ,, On average, for the 15 major plays in the United States, the cost of producing shale oil is $ 30 / bbl, in Canada - $ 35 / bbl. Taking into account taxes, the breakeven price is estimated at $ 63 / bbl on average in the United States and $ 54 / bbl in Canada. The difference is related to the differences of three main parameters that affect economic indicators: in the USA the average well is twice as deep, the final oil recovery from the well is three times as much, taxes are higher than in Canada. ,,
    33. -1
      21 March 2020 11: 58
      Once again, they can also take temporary losses, just to crush Russia.
      1. -2
        21 March 2020 13: 16
        Quote: sanik2020
        Once again, they can also take temporary losses, just to crush Russia.

        You are absolutely right!
        The Americans had the strength to deal with their mortgage crisis, although there were more costs. It is a pity that many do not understand this.
    34. 0
      21 March 2020 13: 02
      Quote: Torak
      You have a child’s level. You don’t even understand how everything works. Tales about the market are for plebeians.

      Well, of course you "know" everything, share your knowledge laughing And show your "level". laughing
    35. The comment was deleted.
    36. -4
      21 March 2020 15: 33
      Well done Putin put Russia in cancer, a smart move ... And they say that there will be enough reserves, but the use of reserves to support the economy at the moment is just throwing money away ... And that the USA, they will agree with the SA and impose an embargo on the sale oil by Russia ... So let's vote for the election of Putin for a new term, for the further deterioration of life and the enrichment of the Putin gang ...
    37. +1
      21 March 2020 15: 37
      Quote: Stas157
      The whole world is only pulling out from cheaper oil. The United States as a whole, too.

      And for this they want to impose sanctions on Russia.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"