The party of serial tanks T-90M "Breakthrough" sent to Moscow to participate in the parade

51
The party of serial tanks T-90M "Breakthrough" sent to Moscow to participate in the parade

Newest Production Party tanks T-90M "Breakthrough" manufactured by Uralvagonzavod. These tanks are prepared for shipment to Moscow to participate in the Victory Parade on May 9 on Red Square. Video about the preparation of tanks provided the channel "Star".

As previously reported by the Ministry of Defense, the newest T-90M "Breakthrough" tanks will be shown for the first time at a parade dedicated to the 75th anniversary of victory in the Great Patriotic War. It also became known that the tests of the newest Russian tank T-90M "Breakthrough" were successfully completed, the timing and volume of serial deliveries of tanks to the troops will be determined by the Ministry of Defense. It is also known that funds for the purchase of T-90M tanks have already been allocated, the delivery of serial vehicles is expected in 2020.



According to available information, in the period 2017-2018, the Ministry of Defense concluded two contracts for the supply of 60 T-90M tanks. Under the first contract, the enterprise was supposed to supply 10 tanks of new construction, and another 20 will be converted in the course of major repairs and modernization from T-90 tanks. Under the second contract, 30 tanks should be delivered, upgraded to T-90M from T-90.


The third contract for the modernization of another 100 T-90A tanks to the T-90M level was signed on June 28, 2019 at the Army-2019 International Military Technical Forum. Another contract also for the modernization of another 100 T-90 tanks to the T-90M level is possible this year.

The T-90М tank was developed as part of the Breakthrough-3 development work and is a deep modernization of the T-90 with increased combat and operational characteristics.

In the course of modernization, a new turret module with a 90-mm gun of increased survivability and accuracy was installed on the T-125M. A remote-controlled machine gun installation caliber 12,7-mm is installed on the turret. In addition, the new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto-tracking and hitting targets.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    51 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -6
      20 March 2020 12: 44
      Armata everything? Will there be no series? It seems to me, and the SU-57 is waiting for the same fate - the ceremonial weapon.
      1. 0
        20 March 2020 12: 49
        It all depends on the state of the Russian economy. T-14 "Armata" are in danger of becoming a kind of T-35. In the 30s, these five-turret tanks were the embodiment of the armored power of the USSR. Released in a total of six dozen pieces, they were indispensable participants in military parades in Moscow and Kiev. Then in the first months of the war they were loved at the front. Admittedly, the Wehrmacht soldiers were very fond of being photographed against the background of the T-35.


        1. +5
          20 March 2020 12: 49
          The economy is at odds with Riyadh.
        2. +2
          20 March 2020 17: 25
          Ah. Aristarkhushka. Big bitch you.
        3. +1
          21 March 2020 06: 43
          This is crap, most likely the engine and transmission flew, so it got up ... Although even Stalin himself insisted on single-turret tanks, there was complete democracy, although if put together with families along the wall, for such crap, it would be good .
          1. 0
            21 March 2020 16: 11
            Quote: fk7777777
            most likely the engine and transmission flew, so I got up

            For technical reasons, the T-35 and fell in love. After the first weeks of the war, the Stalinist dreadnoughts abandoned on the roads near Rava-Russkaya, Lviv, Dubno and Tarnopol were local sights and every self-respecting Wehrmacht soldier in Army Group South was simply obliged to have a memory photo against the backdrop of the T-35.
      2. +18
        20 March 2020 12: 49
        Quote: universe1
        Armata everything? Will there be no series?

        Why? A complex of tests is underway. I think that "Armata-M" can already go to the troops. And this is a normal process of modernizing what we have. Before that, the T-72 was modernized, now the T-90 has been modernized
        1. -8
          20 March 2020 13: 06
          Armata-J will enter the series, here, here. It is necessary to tolerate a little.
        2. -3
          20 March 2020 19: 27
          View of the workshop beyond Altbrecht as during the war. Are there tanks exactly or are they just painting?
          1. +1
            21 March 2020 06: 44
            No, just wash
      3. +9
        20 March 2020 12: 56
        Quote: universe1
        Armata everything? Will there be no series?

        Recently they wrote that in the process of testing a sufficient number of both proposals for modernization and the completed modernizations of individual nodes and systems have already accumulated. So now there is a process of new tests and approval of the release of an already upgraded version.
      4. +3
        20 March 2020 12: 56
        Quote: universe1
        Armata everything? Will there be no series? It seems to me, and the SU-57 is waiting for the same fate - the ceremonial weapon.

        Is everything gone? The series will be, but later.
        The appearance of the “Breakthrough” was a consequence of the delay and cost of work on the creation of the T-14 - a promising Russian main battle tank with an uninhabited tower based on the Armata universal tracked platform. Since the saturation of the ground forces with the revolutionary "Armata" was delayed, a decision was made to modernize the tanks already existing in the units.


        In relation to the T-90, this meant a rather serious refinement of the machine, during which some of the technical solutions previously successfully tested on the T-14 were used. As a result, the T-90M “Breakthrough” was born - a machine that in its characteristics did not reach the T-14, but was much more powerful than the original version of the “nineties”.

        The T-90M tank received a multi-channel sight, a Kalina fire control system with an integrated tactical link combat information and control system, a video surveillance system, a rear-view camera, a new turret, a new automatic loader, a new active defense system for “sweet” - 125 mm smoothbore gun 2A82-1M. The T-14 is armed with the same gun.

        https://riafan.ru/1260139-baly-proryvy-tosochki-i-drugie-novinki-parada-pobedy-2020-v-moskve
      5. +11
        20 March 2020 13: 31
        Tanks, like other weapons, are not immediately released, but for a long time. As long as the new weapons are brought to mind, the old will be modified with might and main, it will last for years, in principle, this is normal practice.

        For example, in the same Afghanistan, there were neither 64 nor 72, there was a good old 62 and 54-55.
      6. -3
        20 March 2020 13: 46
        With the T-90M the same.

        We count. 10 built new ones, as I understand it for the parade, another 50 are being modernized. Those. there is a T-90A that will only (!) be modernized. From the article it is not entirely clear what has already been done or will only be done. Let's count what they did. T.O. currently we have 2 battalions of T-90M tanks
        Further, another 100 tanks will be modernized this year, it may be necessary to add, because the issue of disrupting the defense order has already been considered more than once.
        By the end of 2020, there will be 160 T-90M tanks. On two regiments it is not pulled.
        Once again, new only 10 pieces. Everything else is supposed to be modernized. And again they will tell that new equipment has come to the troops.
        1. +3
          20 March 2020 14: 59
          By the end of 2020, there will be 160 T-90M tanks. On two regiments it is not pulled.

          Which is noticeably better than nothing.
          T-90 of various modifications only about 400 in the army, all that can be modernized (and here is the question of how many such machines) need to be upgraded to the modern version, as well as the modernization of the T-72.
        2. 5-9
          +4
          20 March 2020 15: 54
          Why don't you like the modernized ones? Not a single Western "partner" has been making new tanks for a long time ...
      7. +6
        20 March 2020 13: 48
        Quote: universe1
        Armata everything? Will there be no series? It seems to me, and the SU-57 is waiting for the same fate - the ceremonial weapon.

        It can surrender to you whatever. In the Soviet fleet of fighters and tanks it will not work for a long time and our helmsmen understand this unlike, apparently from you. They invested money, and not small, both in the development of Almaty and in the SU-57. Difficulties are always in developing a new one and you know it. However, we scribbled a post about nothing, in the spirit, everything was just ... stolen. Does the toad press you that they didn’t share it with you, or that they didn’t take it out and put Armata, SU-57, etc., at the click of your finger? Go to the same UralVagonZavod and ask how to create it from scratch, to test, bring, eliminate childhood diseases, optimize the price and all this with the sanction pressure and lack of domestic analogues of what should be on the new armored vehicles.
        1. -1
          20 March 2020 17: 37
          Well, firstly, the UralVagonZavod began to produce products. Not yesterday. And not ten years ago. And complaining about production and structural difficulties is the same. That a midwife who has taken tens of thousands of births will say that she does not know how to accept them.
          1. +2
            20 March 2020 17: 51
            Quote: Seeker
            Well, firstly, the UralVagonZavod began to produce products. Not yesterday. And not ten years ago. And complaining about production and structural difficulties is the same. That a midwife who has taken tens of thousands of births will say that she does not know how to accept them.

            From this I conclude that you are generally far from understanding the very creation of a NEW (not modernized old) armored vehicle. Well, the analogy with a midwife is certainly funny if you do not continue it ... for example, obstetricians in the 18th century also had grandma’s grandmother too, however infant mortality was orders of magnitude higher than now. Why so? Or in the 18th century did not know how to take birth?
      8. +1
        20 March 2020 13: 48
        The T-90M is cheaper than the Armata.
      9. +1
        20 March 2020 15: 26
        Quote: universe1
        Armata everything? Will there be no series?

        We have T-72 and T-90 nowhere to go. Why put into production a new expensive tank, if the old ones after modernization fully meet modern requirements. Is there excess money in the treasury?
        1. -1
          20 March 2020 17: 34
          All of you are balabols! They waited, yelled, "Well, when, when?" now resigned! They started singing about the treasury! The country is not afraid, patient, resigned to everything people! Neighing over all this, but something sad picture ...
          1. -1
            20 March 2020 18: 00
            Quote: sustav75
            Balabol you all! They waited, yelled, "Well, when, when?" now resigned! They started singing about the treasury! A country of not scared, patient, resigned to everything people! Neighing over all this, but something is a sad picture ...

            Are you the only one here who is "NOT ALL"? Don't lump all people together. Well, laugh, over your comment, if you are smart enough to deal with your writing. Do you at least know what the treasury (budget) is, or do you think that Russia has bottomless and only you know how much money is in it and how to use it?
      10. +2
        20 March 2020 17: 19
        Quote: universe1
        Armata everything? Will there be no series?

        =======
        The delivery of small batches for pilot military operation is expected this year and next year.
        -------
        Quote: universe1
        It seems to me, and the SU-57 is waiting for the same fate - the ceremonial weapon.
        .
        SU-57? Definitely - no! It will definitely NOT be accepted into service and will definitely NOT be "ceremonial"! Too old:
        SU-57 (aka T48)

        (https://topwar.ru/158316-lend-lizovskaja-samohodka-su-57-t48.html)
        The same applies to SU-57B (it is also SU-74B):

        And also ASU-57 and ZSU-57-2 (although the latter showed itself quite well in Syria):


        Well, if you so strangely "called" the ZSU "Derivation", then it is still undergoing tests, and its place in the structure of the military air defense has not been determined ... laughing
        1. -2
          20 March 2020 19: 37
          Quote: venik
          SU-57? Definitely - no! They will definitely NOT be adopted

          Unclear. Clever or troll, or cling to the letters? Then really amert them from their U-2

          1. 0
            20 March 2020 20: 07
            Quote: Piramidon
            Unclear. Clever or troll, or cling to the letters?

            ======
            And I don't "get smart" or "troll", and I don't even "cling" to the letters!
            It's your own fault: in the article - about tanks, and you "dragged" the fighter, and even called "drying" as CУ-57 (in capital letters) .... It was a sinful thing and decided that you called the "Derivation-Air Defense", as before the self-propelled guns ... request
            And as for the "drying" - so everything is clear there - they are in no hurry, because with the engines of the 2nd stage there is a problem - the minders are very late. Yes, and "visibility" - also kind of "finalize" it is necessary .... And the machine - not cheap! It is very expensive to produce such massively in a "undeveloped" form !!!
            1. -1
              20 March 2020 21: 57
              Quote: venik
              and even I do not "cling to letters"... they called" drying "as SU-57 (in capital letters).

              You yourself admit that you cling
              1. 0
                20 March 2020 22: 23
                Quote: Piramidon
                You yourself admit that you cling

                ======
                DO NOT CLICK, but explain that your mistake is you to me confused!!!
      11. -1
        20 March 2020 19: 58
        yes small series, only for parades and suitable and further increasing the diversity of the fleet
    2. +3
      20 March 2020 12: 59
      "the latest, the latest, equipped with a highly automated" ... all the rules, but these words cut the ear.
      1. +3
        20 March 2020 13: 12
        after the parade they will write that they are also made of plywood and tin (like the t-14)
        1. +2
          20 March 2020 16: 32
          Let them write that it’s at least out of paper, but we all know that the elite Syrian units broke through the defense of the militants with T-90 tanks, which also had tanks and anti-tank missiles. With the support of the Russian Air Force, this is exactly what needs to be fought. The combat charter of any army will tell you that decisive success in battle is achieved with the right interaction of the combat arms.
          Greetings to the tanks that will march along our sacred cobblestones at the Parade. Let tankers see the generation of winners From there, how their descendants lead an armored box "along the main street with an orchestra" soldier
    3. -10
      20 March 2020 13: 29
      Instead of doing bluffology, it would be better if the capacities for the production of "Calibers" and their carriers were piled up.
      At the moment, Russia has in service only about 10 carriers, capable of carrying from 6 to 12 missiles each. And the United States already has several hundred ships and aircraft capable of carrying Tomahawks, and some of them can single-handedly carry up to 64 missiles.
      And it turns out that the United States can destroy in a single volley all the strategic objects of a very small state, and Russia, in the best case, several large military bases.
      Maximum salvo (how many missiles can be located simultaneously on all available carriers in the ranks):
      Tomahawk - 8 KR
      Caliber - 120 KR. And the parades are good, especially the cavalry and getters in white skirts.
      1. 5-9
        +4
        20 March 2020 15: 56
        Ohhhh .... Tomahawks on airplanes! Yksperd of level 80 visited us ... 8000 thousand Tomahawks in a salvo! What good missiles are that in a volley (the most powerful Tomahawks volley in history, there are 61 in 50 minutes) you can fire 2,5 times more than there are!
    4. -12
      20 March 2020 13: 32
      KAZ is not present. There is no panorama. Did you even put the Conde? Modernization, Schmodernization. Mastering the budget and replacing sewed on soap.
      1. 0
        20 March 2020 21: 12
        Quote: Ovrag
        There is no panorama.

        Someone seems to have no eyes ...
        1. -1
          21 March 2020 22: 33
          The text is about a panoramic camera. It’s just a camera with a 360 degree twist. And this is not close to what is meant by a normal panoramic sight which, purely due to optics, gives a wide-angle view.
          1. 0
            25 March 2020 13: 02
            Quote: Ovrag
            The text is about a panoramic camera. It’s just a camera with a 360 degree twist. And this is not close to what is meant by a normal panoramic sight which, purely due to optics, gives a wide-angle view.

            Look carefully at the photograph of the machines, which is given in the article, there is clearly visible the panoramic sight of the commander with an integrated remotely controlled machine gun installation ...
            If you cannot make out, consult an optometrist ...
    5. -4
      20 March 2020 13: 34
      At the parade they will also have no analogues T-34M ..
    6. -5
      20 March 2020 14: 03
      Is there anyone doubting the rearmament of the army? During a pandemic and the oil war, it is necessary to rally around the GDP and his team, stop all criticism and then there will be breakouts and armats and Poseidons with Sarmatians. This is exactly what the people did during the Second World War, rallying around STALIN, despite the fact that many did not like him (you yourself know why). And so we will WIN !!!
      1. +1
        20 March 2020 14: 18
        Quote: alex aircraft
        Is there anyone doubting the rearmament of the army? During a pandemic and the oil war, it is necessary to rally around the GDP and his team, stop all criticism and then there will be breakouts and armats and Poseidons with Sarmatians. This is exactly what the people did during the Second World War, rallying around STALIN, despite the fact that many did not like him (you yourself know why). And so we will WIN !!!

        Yes, no problem, only let the communal flat be reduced and salaries with pensions will normally increase, but free medicine will be made free, and not shareware. And unite right away. And somehow around the robbers somehow it does not unite, somehow thoughts about how to survive. And yes, do not compare them with Stalin, Stalin is a great personality, in whom prices for everything were reduced.
        1. 0
          20 March 2020 17: 44
          And the great personality was and the people WAS !!!!! great.
    7. -2
      20 March 2020 14: 15
      If for each Victory Parade we will make a batch of new tanks, even then we will gradually saturate the troops with new equipment. It remains only that it would be not only the T-90, but also ...
    8. -1
      20 March 2020 14: 16
      In the photo I do not see the radar antenna from Arena-M. Apparently saving again what
    9. 5-9
      0
      20 March 2020 16: 00
      So is 2A82-1 or 2A46M6 ??? ... that's the question :)

      Can they be distinguished from the photo?
      1. +1
        20 March 2020 16: 22
        Depending on the level of modernization of the T-90. On the T-90M
        It costs 2A82-1M.
        1. 0
          20 March 2020 19: 53
          2A82-1M. stands on exhibition samples, but is offered to foreigners. He goes to the army with 2A46M. As usual saving. and at the exhibition and the condo, and KAZ, and the control wheel instead of levers and a new welded tower with a new filler ... Current when modernizing the old T-90, nobody even changes the tower. they weigh up with dynamic protection a new ..... Well, as with the AK-12, what was at the exhibition and the competition was one that was adopted by another.
          1. 0
            20 March 2020 21: 13
            Quote: V.I.P.
            During the modernization of the old T-90, no one even changes the tower. weight dynamic protection of the new ....

            You, my friend, wouldn’t be talking nonsense, but you’d figure out which of the modernized tanks is simply “DZ weighed down”, and who, including a completely new tower, is being installed ...
    10. 0
      20 March 2020 19: 09
      Should be called "Parade".
    11. -2
      20 March 2020 20: 11
      More even more equipment, but only for parades. In part it is not necessary, otherwise spoil the weather.
    12. -4
      24 March 2020 10: 49
      At this rate, soon "Armata" will be renamed into "Shame"

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"