Wasserman spoke about the causes of the crisis and the “last straw” for the global economy

Wasserman spoke about the causes of the crisis and the “last straw” for the global economy

Today, every person who has heard something about the fall in oil prices, the collapse of the ruble and the problems of the coronavirus, considers it necessary to speak on this topic. Some are discussing how many kilograms of buckwheat and sugar need to be purchased in order to wait out the crisis, while others are thinking on a larger scale, trying to find those responsible for a new round of the crisis in the global economy and its causes in general.


One of the experts who decided to present his point of view on this issue is Anatoly Wasserman. He became a guest of the TV Day channel studio.

Anatoly Wasserman believes that the world market is in an extremely overstressed state, and therefore any accident can bring it down, or even destroy it.

The expert, discussing the causes of what is happening in the global economy, cites data from Mikhail Khazin. In his study, Khazin says that the main way to increase labor productivity — its division — has its limits over a long period of time.

It is noted that one of such limits is the global market, which simply has nowhere to expand further.

According to Anatoly Wasserman, this would be enough for a crisis in the global economy, but additional factors are added. Wasserman, among other things, cites purely technological factors as an example of the “last drop” for the world economy.

Reflections of the expert on the air "Day TV":

Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. gridasov 20 March 2020 18: 25 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    Humanity does not have a consolidated future development for one simple reason. There is no fundamental basis in scientific and technological technology for obtaining a new quality of energy. Further, as in a pyramid from the top down, one problem gives rise to many others.
    1. NEXUS 20 March 2020 18: 32 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      Quote: gridasov
      There is no fundamental basis in scientific and technological technology for obtaining a new quality of energy.

      Not only receiving energy, but also its storage. Plus, replacing really valuable resources with imaginary ones. As an example: fresh water is a really valuable product, but the value of oil is very far-fetched, moreover, in some countries the price of water is several times higher than for oil.
      1. gridasov 20 March 2020 18: 43 New
        • 10
        • 1
        +9
        Technologies for energy consumption of natural resources of the planet should be replaced by technologies for the restoration of these resources. And of course, including Water as the main source of life. Even in very recent posts, I said that humanity is on the verge of serious transformations. He also said that this is not a fantasy-based prophecy. We are stubbornly given knowledge that we ignore.
        1. Mestny 20 March 2020 18: 48 New
          • 8
          • 7
          +1
          These technologies have long been known.
          Namely, a drastic reduction in the world's population.
          Others have not yet been invented.
          1. Mitroha 20 March 2020 19: 04 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Bloodthirsty you. Enough drastic reduction in the technological effectiveness of mankind back to the wheel, stick and ax. And there nature in a short time and numbers will regulate and put the Earth in order
            1. Mestny 20 March 2020 19: 26 New
              • 3
              • 4
              -1
              Ah, well, that is, let the very nature of those who kill the weaker.
              So no one will voluntarily agree to a stick, ax and wheel. Only war.
              1. Mitroha 20 March 2020 19: 38 New
                • 15
                • 1
                +14
                There is an opinion that the peak of a person as a creator has already been passed in the mid-end of the 20th century. Now humanity is rolling downhill. Most of the society is dumb with each generation, in science only those areas are developed that allow you to get a "quick" profit. Discoveries and knowledge that can reduce or stop the income of the powers that be in the world are carefully hidden or destroyed. We can no longer repeat much done by our ancestors. And this regression will go on increasing.
                My opinion is not mine, but I agree on something.
                1. Mestny 20 March 2020 20: 09 New
                  • 10
                  • 5
                  +5
                  The fracture occurred in the seventies. When it turned out that we would not master any planets, and we would not fly to any stars either.
                  Humanity is part of a completely closed system, which is forced to destroy part of itself in order to survive, and start again.
                  We have this natural mechanism, even two.
                  These are wars and viruses.
                2. IC
                  IC 17 May 2020 02: 30 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  I think the same thing was said in ancient Rome, in the Middle Ages, and always so. The person was dumb, dumb and mastered atomic energy, created computers, biotechnology, organ transplantation, etc.
          2. gridasov 20 March 2020 19: 52 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            I do not think that such technologies have at least a little rationality. The productive period of a person’s life is very short. This is more sufficient for population processes to take place in a natural way.
          3. nikvic46 20 March 2020 20: 21 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Sergey. The population is mainly located on one part of the planet. Another thing is consumption. It is estimated that if China consumes as much as in the USA, there will be a nutrition problem on Earth.
            1. Igor Pa 21 March 2020 22: 54 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              So that’s why they eat bats and cockroaches! They do not want to create problems for humanity!)
        2. Svetlana 20 March 2020 19: 07 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          To restore resources you need to spend some of them. And since there are no engines or say energy converters with an efficiency of more than 100 percent, what you are talking about is utopia.
          1. gridasov 20 March 2020 19: 36 New
            • 2
            • 7
            -5
            This is not utopia! If there is an elastic air environment in which we live, then you can always not only get an excess of energy relative to the applied energy, but also change the dimension of this excess energy. In other words, the kinetic energy of the air flow can be used to transform the potential energy of the substance of the moving stream. Moreover, we can get the same Water in such isotropic forms that we could not even dream of before
            1. Svetlana 20 March 2020 19: 41 New
              • 4
              • 3
              +1
              What is the dimension of energy?
              What is energy transformation?
              What specific isotropic types of water can we not even dream of?
              .
              Do not pour water, be more specific.
              1. gridasov 20 March 2020 20: 01 New
                • 2
                • 2
                0
                I am talking about completely basic concepts. For example, the level of interaction and the consequences of such interactions between balls on a pool table and planetary collisions have differences that can be described by mathematical technologies built on a function of a constant value of the number and not by computational methods. The essence of these differences lies precisely in the fact that the capacitive information parameters of some interactions differ from others. That is, some large descriptive data are at fractal levels different from others. And in general, I do not engage in educational activities. You must look for answers to your questions yourself.
                1. Svetlana 20 March 2020 20: 46 New
                  • 4
                  • 3
                  +1
                  And in general, I do not engage in educational activities.

                  And thank God hi We do not need such enlighteners.
                  1. gridasov 20 March 2020 20: 55 New
                    • 6
                    • 5
                    +1
                    And we are not asking for it. Besides, you are not entitled to choose. This is what we choose. You are slaves of money and vanity. And we are the guardians of knowledge. It will be necessary and will bury them with us. In the meantime, we are doing what is supposed to be!
                    1. Svetlana 20 March 2020 20: 57 New
                      • 3
                      • 3
                      0
                      TTT .. God forbid from such educators.
                      1. Mordvin 3 20 March 2020 21: 25 New
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        +2
                        Quote: Svetlana
                        God forbid from such educators

                        That's it. Gridasov was completely insolent. laughing
                      2. gridasov 20 March 2020 21: 39 New
                        • 4
                        • 3
                        +1
                        There is such a thing as timeliness. In a mathematical and algorithmically related space, this corresponds to the fact that any object and process corresponds to its place and value. Therefore, I form the above as a system info product. And I will tell you frankly, not always to my opponents, namely for those who only read and do not participate in discussions. That’s why I’m saying that you need to work with information as a raw tool, and not as a derivative of emotions
                      3. Mordvin 3 20 March 2020 21: 42 New
                        • 4
                        • 1
                        +3
                        Quote: gridasov
                        And frankly, not always to my opponents

                        Gridasov, do you drink vodka?
                      4. gridasov 20 March 2020 21: 46 New
                        • 7
                        • 2
                        +5
                        Vodka is very interesting to use in different quantities and depending on the psycho of the physical state as a tool for creating altered consciousness. In addition, effects in the post-alcohol process are interesting.
                      5. Mordvin 3 20 March 2020 21: 52 New
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        0
                        Quote: gridasov
                        Vodka is very interesting to drink in different quantities.

                        Of course it’s interesting. But I wonder what you personally feel at the same time.
                        Quote: gridasov
                        In addition, effects in the post-alcohol process are interesting.

                        And how. For example, I am drawn to poetry.
                      6. gridasov 20 March 2020 22: 15 New
                        • 4
                        • 0
                        +4
                        Alcohol for a very short period of time, dilutes the blood. Without going into the details of the physics of the process, I just say that you need not just to use this moment, but to learn how to enter your consciousness into a similar state, but without alcohol, etc. I remember Edgar Poe very often wrote in a distorted mind. I’ll hint that this condition is caused by breathing exercises with delays in the intake of air either on inhalation or on exhalation. Or different breath dynamics and at different stages. Air regulation has long been used by different cultures. But as the Eastern sages say, Europeans are not able to comprehend this technique. But this does not mean the impossibility of mastering these exercises, but the absence of traditions and the succession of knowledge from ancestors.
                      7. Mordvin 3 20 March 2020 22: 27 New
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        +2
                        Quote: gridasov
                        I’ll hint that this condition is caused by breathing exercises with delays in the intake of air either on inhalation or on exhalation.

                        Put on a gas mask, put the hose from the oxygen cylinder into the elephant and try. What exercises to do there, mechanics is our everything. Just turn the valve back and forth ...
                  2. TANKISTONE 21 March 2020 20: 11 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    It seems that someone is retyping the answers of “Alice” or “Marousi” ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 30143 22 March 2020 08: 11 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Svetlana
        And in general, I do not engage in educational activities.

        And thank God hi We do not need such enlighteners.

        And what kind of education do you have that carry a non-fellow?
    2. Revival 21 March 2020 04: 10 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Now everything is concrete and clear)) laughing
  • bodzu April 27 2020 02: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    All the trick in the methodology for calculating this efficiency. Gentlemen, “scientists” when they discuss this efficiency always consider a closed system, but it does not exist in principle - these are the so-called “assumptions”.
  • NEXUS 20 March 2020 19: 14 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Quote: gridasov
    Technologies for energy consumption of natural resources of the planet should be replaced by technologies for the restoration of these resources

    Exactly, but without the barbaric (through the knee) human intervention in the natural processes of recovery.
    Quote: gridasov
    Even in very recent posts, I said that humanity is on the verge of serious transformations.

    These transformations are already underway, starting from reformatting people as thinking beings, and ending with the imposition of imaginary values. As for technology, I am sure that humanity has chosen (or have chosen for it) the wrong, dead end path of development, as a consumer, lazy and stupid.
    Quote: gridasov
    We are stubbornly given knowledge that we ignore.

    Here I partly agree with you. Namely, in the context of the knowledge that was created, but successfully hidden from humanity.
  • Maki Avellevich 20 March 2020 20: 39 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: gridasov
    Technologies for energy consumption of natural resources of the planet should be replaced by technologies for the restoration of these resources.

    look wider.
    so far we have used energy on the scale of the planet (ours)
    Now it's time to learn how to use the energy of our star.
    it will be seen further. galaxy, universe, etc.
    1. gridasov 20 March 2020 20: 59 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Reality is more prosaic. The flame ignites from a spark. Tree of seed.
  • Svarog 20 March 2020 18: 44 New
    • 9
    • 5
    +4
    Quote: NEXUS
    moreover, now in some countries the price of water is several times higher than that of oil.

    In Russia, including. 250 ml. Costs 30 rubles ..
    1. Mitroha 20 March 2020 19: 09 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      It’s expensive somewhere with you. In our store 5l. clean drinking water 37r. And also completely free access to the springs with free (not counting the road) but exceptionally delicious water. It’s very good to make compotes from it and dilute alcohol. drinks
      1. NEXUS 20 March 2020 19: 17 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: Mitroha
        And also completely free access to the springs with free (not counting the road) but exceptionally delicious water.

        And you certainly believe that these springs are directly inexhaustible.
        1. Mitroha 20 March 2020 19: 23 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          I do not understand why your inappropriate statement?
          PS Minus is not mine
          1. NEXUS 20 March 2020 19: 38 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Mitroha
            I do not understand why your inappropriate statement?
            PS Minus is not mine

            Are you sure it is inappropriate? You say that you have 5 liters of water costs 37 rubles, and the springs, so generally for free they have wonderful water. The question is, are you sure that this will always be so? And the second question, do you think that free drinking water will always be there?
            And if I tell you that after 100 years, 5 liters of drinking water will cost $ 1000 (conditionally), and even exchange this water with oil at the exchanges, as now, what’s the answer?
            1. Mitroha 20 March 2020 19: 50 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              I am sure, for without a question mark this statement. And I didn’t say that free water will always be. As a rational person, I understand that it is natural PURE water, as a resource, that is finite.
              But this does not replace the fact that we currently have a choice: free pure natural drinking water in natural sources, or for little money within walking distance.
              And that was Svarog's answer, if you look.
            2. Mitroha 20 March 2020 20: 19 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              NEXUS
              "And if I tell you that after 100 years, 5 liters of drinking water will cost $ 1000 (conditionally), and even exchange this water with oil at the exchanges, as now, what’s the answer?"-
              I will answer that this statement is your personal, unconfirmed fantasy.
              1. NEXUS 20 March 2020 20: 58 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                Quote: Mitroha
                I will answer that this statement is your personal, unconfirmed fantasy.

                Che seriously?
                One in six people in the world does not have clean drinking water. Water-related diseases are a leading cause of human illness and death.

                • 1,1 billion people in the world do not have access to safe drinking water, which is approximately one sixth of the world's population.
                • 2,2 million people in developing countries, most of whom are children, die each year from diseases associated with a lack of access to safe drinking water, proper sanitation and hygiene.
                • Half of hospital beds around the world are occupied by people suffering from water-related diseases.
                • Over the past 10 years, more children have died from diarrhea than in all armed conflicts after World War II.
                • Despite the scale of the problem, we have not made sufficient progress in the fight. The problem was reduced only to 181 million people who now live without clean drinking water in rural areas, in 2004 this figure was 899 million, in 1990 1080 million.
                • 50% of people on earth have neither proper sanitation, nor drinking water filters or travel water filters. Or we can say that almost half of the world's population does not receive as much water as the inhabitants of Ancient Rome received 2000 years ago.

                • About 6000 children die every day from illnesses related to lack of access to safe drinking water, proper sanitation and hygiene - these are about 20 large airliners per day.
                • The distance that women in Africa and Asia have to walk on foot when hike for water is six kilometers.
                • Tens of millions of children cannot go to school because they must bring water every day.

                Che there you gurgled about my fantasies?
                1. gridasov 20 March 2020 21: 18 New
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  +5
                  Water technology should be built into a separate branch of science. At this stage, we are saying that all knowledge about Water needs to be classified and systematized. At this time, we are talking about the possibility or technology of desalination of large volumes, which in the future can be modified to suit various needs. The same technology provides for the purification of water from any, including radioactive contamination and large areas and volumes. The same technology provides for the use of Water as a fuel, by the method of its destruction and due to its own hydrological process properties. The same technology provides for the possibility of obtaining such qualitative properties of Water that previously could not be reproduced in any way.
                  1. Stas157 21 March 2020 06: 54 New
                    • 4
                    • 1
                    +3
                    This reverse osmosis technology is called. Currently available to everyone.
                  2. gridasov 21 March 2020 10: 19 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Absolutely not! I wonder why such a conclusion. How can osmosis be used for large volumes? How osmosis can extract the potential energy of a substance. You're not right
              2. Mitroha 20 March 2020 21: 28 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                NEXUS
                Did not consider the version that after 100 years of humanity will not be at all? And your statement is as unprovable as this version, which you were informed about. In addition to reading, you must have understanding.
                "Che there you gurgled about my fantasies? "
                You gurgled, and obviously into a puddle. Watch your language, it’s an unpaired organ, a hamlo.
              3. edasko 21 March 2020 21: 10 New
                • 0
                • 3
                -3
                It must be assumed that if there are a lot of billions of people who do not have clean water, as well as food, as well as medicines, clean air, etc., then they need to somehow give it all? It does not matter that they live in places that are not quite suitable for living for various reasons - natural, social. For example, in Central Asia, not everything is good in this regard, and the birth rate is very high. Let's give them water, food, medicine. What will happen? The better the living conditions, the more fertility will increase and again something will be missed. The problem is not the amount of water - the problem is the number of people, and this problem will ultimately be solved, if not by the people themselves, so by nature. I think she can do it just by snapping her fingers)))
  • Alexey Sommer 20 March 2020 20: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: NEXUS
    but the value of oil is very far-fetched

    Dear Andrey, I completely disagree with this thesis!
    Water is the source of life, but also the source of energy is also vital to civilization.
    It used to be wood (bonfire) then coal, now the main source of energy for cars is gasoline. Today, vehicles operating on petroleum products bring water to machines in yards. So nothing is far-fetched. Oil is needed today.
    1. NEXUS 20 March 2020 20: 35 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Alexey Sommer
      It used to be wood (bonfire) then coal, now the main source of energy for cars is gasoline.

      That is why dear Gridasov said about other sources of energy. And I added that ..
      Quote: NEXUS
      but without barbaric (through the knee) human intervention in the natural processes of recovery.

      And oil production is just the most fanciful way for the planet to get its favorite energy.
  • Dog
    Dog 20 March 2020 23: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: NEXUS
    Now in some countries the price of water is many times higher than oil.

    And for beer in general, in most, if not all!
    And while beer is also a really valuable product.
    We get off the oil needle - all investments and the entire stabilization fund in the production of beer!
  • Cowbra 20 March 2020 19: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: gridasov
    Humanity has no consolidated development

    The concept of "sustainable development".
    1. gridasov 20 March 2020 20: 13 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Sustainable development concepts are aimed at developing individual economies and countries. I’m talking about concepts involving the development of all of humanity as a species relative to those civilizations that allow themselves to be present next to us. We must admit that just as we, in our evolution and development, are trying to preserve the primitive tribes in isolated parts of the planet, we are in some way controlled from self-destruction in the space of other developed civilizations, so that we do not show our presence in open form.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. gridasov 20 March 2020 21: 58 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          I expected such an answer. And I can say, once again, that I can’t describe the lack of mathematical technologies to process complex systems and can be used to describe global events. Therefore, I consciously say that a person uses information as he himself invented - he believed it was far from objective. To be specific, I’ll ask how scientists, for example, evaluate the impact of garbage islands on the speed of various ocean currents, which ultimately translate into evaporation rate and a lot other procedural phenomena. In short, give me at least one real recommendatory answer to how to maintain this sustainable development, within the framework of all the factors of influence taken into account. You just do not know how to do it!
      2. Hypatius 21 March 2020 01: 24 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Sustainable development concepts are aimed at developing individual economies and countries.
        The concept consists of 4 De. Deindustrialization, depopulation, desocialization and desuverinization. The goal is NWM, but by no means individual countries.
        ..we are in some way controlled from self-destruction in the space of other developed civilizations
        But they themselves periodically bomb and then flood the civilization. Good overseers, however.
  • Chaldon48 20 March 2020 20: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The financial backstage is to blame for all the crises, and it is also the main beneficiary.
  • Svetlana 20 March 2020 18: 51 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Scrabble and expert are two different things. Wasserman belongs to the first, that is, to walking knowledge bases. Which are usually in the hands of real analysts and managers
    1. gridasov 20 March 2020 19: 47 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      In the context of the voiced note, that humanity is in a fairly primitive stage of its development. The human brain is an analysis mechanism, primarily in the aspect of working with information. And there are no machine technologies, as they call it, we are not capable of analyzing large and even more highly dynamic complex transformations of this information. And if anyone speaks of serious analysts, then these are more often anomalies than educated abilities. And therefore it is worth talking about technology to expand the potential of the brain of any person. And this can be done solely on the basis of mathematics.
      1. NEXUS 20 March 2020 20: 38 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: gridasov
        In the context of the voiced note, that humanity is in a fairly primitive stage of its development.

        That's right ... starting from the fact that to this day we use the invention of 5 thousand years ago, called the Wheel, and further down the list ... gunpowder, the same oil as an energy source (despite the fact that we use electricity relatively yesterday ) and so on ... examples of three cars typed.
        1. gridasov 20 March 2020 20: 48 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          An attempt to present the wheel in a new form, namely as a new and more effective process of transforming the environment in which it is located, so far, is not of interest.
  • Warrior MorePhoto 20 March 2020 19: 05 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    By the way ... whatever you want, but I will say my personal opinion, observations and not panic, but a balanced and thought-out personal wang forecast ...

    This year is the beginning of the Great Depression of the 21st century ... I don’t know how much it will be, because will depend on the "movements" of the states ... now the dynamics, due to technology and development, is different from 1929-1939, so I think 2 years, then let's go up.

    Wars, yes, they will. We will participate? Let’s be, like Afghanistan, Syria (not on our territory, maybe we will tame Ukraine), somewhere Libya, Yemen ...

    March 25, the first cutoff, April 1-2, the second, April 14-15, the third - we clean whoever has the weapon and collect an alarming suitcase.

    We eat vitamins now, push out and squat. Whoever has the opportunity, go to shooting clubs. See the jumble, eat tasty and get ready if that)
    1. Paul Siebert 20 March 2020 19: 55 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Toilet paper needs to be purchased ... after the first cut-off?
  • Nikolai 20 March 2020 20: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Wesserman appeared in the media two or three years ago, and in advertising on the stove recently, indicating his growing rating. Where did he come from?
    1. gridasov 20 March 2020 21: 23 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      No one forces anyone to follow the arguments of Anatoly Wasserman. But not to listen to his reasoning as objectively unique in informational content is to be a suicide.
    2. Avior 21 March 2020 02: 47 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And where have lately come from, experts, all sorts of Kovtuns, on television? I came from Ukraine ....
      1. Nikolai 21 March 2020 22: 28 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        So is he a migrant worker?
    3. Paul Siebert 21 March 2020 11: 11 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Nikolai Aleksandrovich
      Where did he come from?

      He is the son of Wasserwuman ... laughing
      1. Nikolai 21 March 2020 22: 24 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Bravo !, Colleague.
  • Old Horseradish 20 March 2020 21: 10 New
    • 5
    • 6
    -1
    Let my friend Wasserman talk better about how a handful of oligarchic monkeys reign in Russia. And that we are not just a colony, but a subcolony. And we can rave about the global economy without our "friend" Wasserman. Another wizard for hanging noodles.
  • Warrior MorePhoto 20 March 2020 21: 44 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Paul Siebert
    Toilet paper needs to be purchased ... after the first cut-off?


    If a tanker, then it will not help)
    In general, my forecast is short-term, so we'll see) if you can take a screenshot and I’m 54 meters, or buckwheat from you)
  • Puper driver 20 March 2020 21: 50 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    By the loafing. Long and linear.
  • Old Horseradish 20 March 2020 22: 33 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    It’s not “Military Review”, but the sect of Wassermann’s idolaters. Shake noodles off your ears. And let Wasserman better tell, "Is there life on Mars?".
    1. Nikolai 21 March 2020 22: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      A good idea is to send Wasserman to Mars. And he already has experience of going out into outer space (judging by the advertising of an electric heating device).
  • Cowbra 21 March 2020 02: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Sorry, but the question is one ... And who is, in fact. this vaser man? And that's all, excuse me, if he were a significant specialist - he wouldn’t have ruffled his waistcoat for different people.
  • Avior 21 March 2020 02: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    First of all, I would like to clarify, in what area is Wasserman an expert?
    1. Linxs 21 March 2020 04: 01 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      In 2020 is not important. The main thing to write. Expert...
    2. gridasov 21 March 2020 10: 11 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      there are stereotypes in people's thinking. So Wasserman has a very important ability to see and reason with the deeper aspects of the interactions of various events. If it is easier to say, any opinion should take into account not only alternative views, but more extended ones. Therefore, I would appreciate such people precisely for their logical abilities to see alternatives to common views
      1. Nikolai 21 March 2020 22: 37 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        What do you think: without glasses he has the “ability to see alternatives with a common look”?
  • Vladimir SHajkin 21 March 2020 11: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    ... In his study, Khazin says that the main way for increasing labor productivity over a long period of time - its division - has its limits.

    It is noted that one of such limits is the global market, which simply has nowhere to expand further.

    According to Anatoly Wasserman, this would be enough for a crisis in the global economy, but additional factors are added. Wasserman, among other things, cites purely technological factors as an example of the “last drop” for the world economy.

    The limitation of market expansion by Khazin and technological factors by Wasserman lead to one main reason - the division of markets and in this regard, the development of contradictions.
    1. Nikolai 21 March 2020 22: 41 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The markets of about 300 years are divided, as long as there are contradictions, and what's new?
  • IC
    IC 21 March 2020 15: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The country has a clear oversupply of the so-called economists, political scientists, and lawyers. In an emergency, over 30 years, they became specialists in a market economy without any practical experience and education. There is no one who is only intelligently leading and working. It turned out that there was not even a second politician for the position of first person.
  • 123456789 22 March 2020 16: 55 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: mordvin xnumx
    Gridasov, do you drink vodka?

    In small doses - in any quantities. laughing
  • Petrol cutter 22 March 2020 18: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "Some are discussing how many kilograms of buckwheat and sugar need to be bought in order to wait out the crisis, while others are thinking on a larger scale, trying to find those responsible for a new round of the crisis in the global economy and its causes in general."
    What is there to discuss? Everyone should purchase all available buckwheat, as well as sugar, within a radius of two kilometers from their place of residence.
    For some reason, unfairly ignore flour, potatoes and other root crops. It is also necessary to purchase a three-month supply of meat components.
    Again, one must not forget about the annual supply of tea, matches and cigarettes.

    And look at the person ... Will you gobble up all this?! .. No. Why buy it ?! The epidemic ...
    And who are the "skirmishers" of these epidemics ... Thank you and God, we are not children. And they should be well aware. When something happens very right and on time, look for - who benefits from it.
  • 123456789 22 March 2020 19: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Svarog
    In Russia, including. 250 ml. Costs 30 rubles ..

    Quote: Mitroha
    It’s expensive somewhere with you. In our store 5l. clean drinking water 37r.

    These are tricks of marketers, they teach this at business courses. A man tormented by thirst will give any money for a sip of water.
    A "5l. Pure drinking water 37r." - This is closer to the real cost of cleaning, bottling and trading margins of the store.
  • 123456789 22 March 2020 19: 19 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: gridasov
    There is no fundamental basis in scientific and technological technology for obtaining a new quality of energy.

    We live on one of the plates of a supercapacitor with a capacity of one Farada. It is enough to close the plates and we get an inexhaustible stream of free energy.
  • Kabron April 3 2020 16: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Recently, there has been an increased erection of Wasserman in all mass media
  • nikvic46 April 17 2020 06: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Wasserman arouses double feelings in me. I appreciate him as a great scholar. But as an expert .. Here's a snag. People who want to say something or write often don’t carry their lively thoughts. This is everywhere. They either think of us as fools .. After all, possessing such erudition, you can open the whole world for us. And so continuous graphomania.