Wasserman spoke about the causes of the crisis and the “last straw” for the global economy

85
Wasserman spoke about the causes of the crisis and the “last straw” for the global economy

Today, every person who has heard something about the fall in oil prices, the collapse of the ruble and the problems of the coronavirus, considers it necessary to speak on this topic. Some are discussing how many kilograms of buckwheat and sugar need to be purchased in order to wait out the crisis, while others are thinking on a larger scale, trying to find those responsible for a new round of the crisis in the global economy and its causes in general.

One of the experts who decided to present his point of view on this issue is Anatoly Wasserman. He became a guest of the TV Day channel studio.



Anatoly Wasserman believes that the world market is in an extremely overstressed state, and therefore any accident can bring it down, or even destroy it.

The expert, discussing the causes of what is happening in the global economy, cites data from Mikhail Khazin. In his study, Khazin says that the main way to increase labor productivity — its division — has its limits over a long period of time.

It is noted that one of such limits is the global market, which simply has nowhere to expand further.

According to Anatoly Wasserman, this would be enough for a crisis in the global economy, but additional factors are added. Wasserman, among other things, cites purely technological factors as an example of the “last drop” for the world economy.

Reflections of the expert on the air "Day TV":

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    85 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      20 March 2020 18: 25
      Humanity does not have a consolidated future development for one simple reason. There is no fundamental basis in scientific and technological technology for obtaining a new quality of energy. Further, as in a pyramid from the top down, one problem gives rise to many others.
      1. +6
        20 March 2020 18: 32
        Quote: gridasov
        There is no fundamental basis in scientific and technological technology for obtaining a new quality of energy.

        Not only receiving energy, but also its storage. Plus, replacing really valuable resources with imaginary ones. As an example: fresh water is a really valuable product, but the value of oil is very far-fetched, moreover, in some countries the price of water is several times higher than for oil.
        1. +9
          20 March 2020 18: 43
          Technologies for energy consumption of natural resources of the planet should be replaced by technologies for the restoration of these resources. And of course, including Water as the main source of life. Even in very recent posts, I said that humanity is on the verge of serious transformations. He also said that this is not a fantasy-based prophecy. We are stubbornly given knowledge that we ignore.
          1. +1
            20 March 2020 18: 48
            These technologies have long been known.
            Namely, a drastic reduction in the world's population.
            Others have not yet been invented.
            1. +4
              20 March 2020 19: 04
              Bloodthirsty you. Enough drastic reduction in the technological effectiveness of mankind back to the wheel, stick and ax. And there nature in a short time and numbers will regulate and put the Earth in order
              1. -1
                20 March 2020 19: 26
                Ah, well, that is, let the very nature of those who kill the weaker.
                So no one will voluntarily agree to a stick, ax and wheel. Only war.
                1. +14
                  20 March 2020 19: 38
                  It is believed that the peak of man as a creator has already been passed in the middle to the end of the 20th century. Now humanity is rolling downhill. Most of the society grows dumber with each generation, in science only those areas are developing that allow you to get "quick" profits. Discoveries and knowledge that can reduce or stop the income of the powerful of the world are carefully hidden or destroyed. We can no longer repeat much of what our ancestors did. And this regression will be progressive.
                  My opinion is not mine, but I agree on something.
                  1. +5
                    20 March 2020 20: 09
                    The fracture occurred in the seventies. When it turned out that we would not master any planets, and we would not fly to any stars either.
                    Humanity is part of a completely closed system, which is forced to destroy part of itself in order to survive, and start again.
                    We have this natural mechanism, even two.
                    These are wars and viruses.
                  2. IC
                    0
                    17 May 2020 02: 30
                    I think the same thing was said in ancient Rome, in the Middle Ages, and always so. The person was dumb, dumb and mastered atomic energy, created computers, biotechnology, organ transplantation, etc.
            2. +3
              20 March 2020 19: 52
              I do not think that such technologies have at least a little rationality. The productive period of a person’s life is very short. This is more sufficient for population processes to take place in a natural way.
            3. 0
              20 March 2020 20: 21
              Sergey. The population is mainly located on one part of the planet. Another thing is consumption. It is estimated that if China consumes as much as in the USA, there will be a nutrition problem on Earth.
              1. +1
                21 March 2020 22: 54
                So that’s why they eat bats and cockroaches! They do not want to create problems for humanity!)
          2. 0
            20 March 2020 19: 07
            To restore resources you need to spend some of them. And since there are no engines or say energy converters with an efficiency of more than 100 percent, what you are talking about is utopia.
            1. -5
              20 March 2020 19: 36
              This is not utopia! If there is an elastic air environment in which we live, then you can always not only get an excess of energy relative to the applied energy, but also change the dimension of this excess energy. In other words, the kinetic energy of the air flow can be used to transform the potential energy of the substance of the moving stream. Moreover, we can get the same Water in such isotropic forms that we could not even dream of before
              1. +1
                20 March 2020 19: 41
                What is the dimension of energy?
                What is energy transformation?
                What specific isotropic types of water can we not even dream of?
                ...
                Do not pour water, be more specific.
                1. 0
                  20 March 2020 20: 01
                  I am talking about completely basic concepts. For example, the level of interaction and the consequences of such interactions between balls on a pool table and planetary collisions have differences that can be described by mathematical technologies built on a function of a constant value of the number and not by computational methods. The essence of these differences lies precisely in the fact that the capacitive information parameters of some interactions differ from others. That is, some large descriptive data are at fractal levels different from others. And in general, I do not engage in educational activities. You must look for answers to your questions yourself.
                  1. +1
                    20 March 2020 20: 46
                    And in general, I do not engage in educational activities.

                    And thank God hi We do not need such enlighteners.
                    1. +1
                      20 March 2020 20: 55
                      And we are not asking for it. Besides, you are not entitled to choose. This is what we choose. You are slaves of money and vanity. And we are the guardians of knowledge. It will be necessary and will bury them with us. In the meantime, we are doing what is supposed to be!
                      1. 0
                        20 March 2020 20: 57
                        TTT .. God forbid from such educators.
                        1. +2
                          20 March 2020 21: 25
                          Quote: Svetlana
                          God forbid from such educators

                          That's it. Gridasov was completely insolent. laughing
                        2. +1
                          20 March 2020 21: 39
                          There is such a thing as timeliness. In a mathematical and algorithmically related space, this corresponds to the fact that any object and process corresponds to its place and value. Therefore, I form the above as a system info product. And I will tell you frankly, not always to my opponents, namely for those who only read and do not participate in discussions. That’s why I’m saying that you need to work with information as a raw tool, and not as a derivative of emotions
                        3. +3
                          20 March 2020 21: 42
                          Quote: gridasov
                          And frankly, not always to my opponents

                          Gridasov, do you drink vodka?
                        4. +5
                          20 March 2020 21: 46
                          Vodka is very interesting to use in different quantities and depending on the psycho of the physical state as a tool for creating altered consciousness. In addition, effects in the post-alcohol process are interesting.
                        5. 0
                          20 March 2020 21: 52
                          Quote: gridasov
                          Vodka is very interesting to drink in different quantities.

                          Of course it’s interesting. But I wonder what you personally feel at the same time.
                          Quote: gridasov
                          In addition, effects in the post-alcohol process are interesting.

                          And how. For example, I am drawn to poetry.
                        6. +4
                          20 March 2020 22: 15
                          Alcohol for a very short period of time, dilutes the blood. Without going into the details of the physics of the process, I just say that you need not just to use this moment, but to learn how to enter your consciousness into a similar state, but without alcohol, etc. I remember Edgar Poe very often wrote in a distorted mind. I’ll hint that this condition is caused by breathing exercises with delays in the intake of air either on inhalation or on exhalation. Or different breath dynamics and at different stages. Air regulation has long been used by different cultures. But as the Eastern sages say, Europeans are not able to comprehend this technique. But this does not mean the impossibility of mastering these exercises, but the absence of traditions and the succession of knowledge from ancestors.
                        7. +2
                          20 March 2020 22: 27
                          Quote: gridasov
                          I’ll hint that this condition is caused by breathing exercises with delays in the intake of air either on inhalation or on exhalation.

                          Put on a gas mask, put the hose from the oxygen cylinder into the elephant and try. What exercises to do there, mechanics is our everything. Just turn the valve back and forth ...
                        8. +1
                          21 March 2020 20: 11
                          It seems that someone is retyping the answers of "Alice" or "Marusya" ...
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                    3. 0
                      22 March 2020 08: 11
                      Quote: Svetlana
                      And in general, I do not engage in educational activities.

                      And thank God hi We do not need such enlighteners.

                      And what kind of education do you have that carry a non-fellow?
                  2. -1
                    21 March 2020 04: 10
                    Now everything is concrete and clear)) laughing
            2. 0
              April 27 2020 02: 07
              The whole trick is in the method of calculating this efficiency. Gentlemen "scientists" when discussing this efficiency always consider a closed system, but it does not exist in principle - these are the so-called "assumptions".
          3. +4
            20 March 2020 19: 14
            Quote: gridasov
            Technologies for energy consumption of natural resources of the planet should be replaced by technologies for the restoration of these resources

            Exactly, but without the barbaric (through the knee) human intervention in the natural processes of recovery.
            Quote: gridasov
            Even in very recent posts, I said that humanity is on the verge of serious transformations.

            These transformations are already underway, starting from reformatting people as thinking beings, and ending with the imposition of imaginary values. As for technology, I am sure that humanity has chosen (or have chosen for it) the wrong, dead end path of development, as a consumer, lazy and stupid.
            Quote: gridasov
            We are stubbornly given knowledge that we ignore.

            Here I partly agree with you. Namely, in the context of the knowledge that was created, but successfully hidden from humanity.
          4. -1
            20 March 2020 20: 39
            Quote: gridasov
            Technologies for energy consumption of natural resources of the planet should be replaced by technologies for the restoration of these resources.

            look wider.
            so far we have used energy on the scale of the planet (ours)
            Now it's time to learn how to use the energy of our star.
            it will be seen further. galaxy, universe, etc.
            1. +1
              20 March 2020 20: 59
              Reality is more prosaic. The flame ignites from a spark. Tree of seed.
        2. +4
          20 March 2020 18: 44
          Quote: NEXUS
          moreover, now in some countries the price of water is several times higher than that of oil.

          In Russia, including. 250 ml. Costs 30 rubles ..
          1. +2
            20 March 2020 19: 09
            It’s expensive somewhere with you. In our store 5l. clean drinking water 37r. And also completely free access to the springs with free (not counting the road) but exceptionally delicious water. It’s very good to make compotes from it and dilute alcohol. drinks
            1. +1
              20 March 2020 19: 17
              Quote: Mitroha
              And also completely free access to the springs with free (not counting the road) but exceptionally delicious water.

              And you certainly believe that these springs are directly inexhaustible.
              1. 0
                20 March 2020 19: 23
                I do not understand why your inappropriate statement?
                PS Minus is not mine
                1. +1
                  20 March 2020 19: 38
                  Quote: Mitroha
                  I do not understand why your inappropriate statement?
                  PS Minus is not mine

                  Are you sure it is inappropriate? You say that you have 5 liters of water costs 37 rubles, and the springs, so generally for free they have wonderful water. The question is, are you sure that this will always be so? And the second question, do you think that free drinking water will always be there?
                  And if I tell you that after 100 years, 5 liters of drinking water will cost $ 1000 (conditionally), and even exchange this water with oil at the exchanges, as now, what’s the answer?
                  1. 0
                    20 March 2020 19: 50
                    I am sure, for without a question mark this statement. And I didn’t say that free water will always be. As a rational person, I understand that it is natural PURE water, as a resource, that is finite.
                    But this does not replace the fact that we currently have a choice: free pure natural drinking water in natural sources, or for little money within walking distance.
                    And that was Svarog's answer, if you look.
                  2. +1
                    20 March 2020 20: 19
                    NEXUS
                    "And if I tell you that after 100 years, 5 liters of drinking water will cost $ 1000 (conditionally), and even exchange this water with oil at the exchanges, as now, what’s the answer?"-
                    I will answer that this statement is your personal, unconfirmed fantasy.
                    1. -1
                      20 March 2020 20: 58
                      Quote: Mitroha
                      I will answer that this statement is your personal, unconfirmed fantasy.

                      Che seriously?
                      One in six people in the world does not have clean drinking water. Water-related diseases are a leading cause of human illness and death.

                      • 1,1 billion people in the world do not have access to safe drinking water, which is approximately one sixth of the world's population.
                      • 2,2 million people in developing countries, most of whom are children, die each year from diseases associated with a lack of access to safe drinking water, proper sanitation and hygiene.
                      • Half of hospital beds around the world are occupied by people suffering from water-related diseases.
                      • Over the past 10 years, more children have died from diarrhea than in all armed conflicts after World War II.
                      • Despite the scale of the problem, we have not made sufficient progress in the fight. The problem was reduced only to 181 million people who now live without clean drinking water in rural areas, in 2004 this figure was 899 million, in 1990 1080 million.
                      • 50% of people on earth have neither proper sanitation, nor drinking water filters or travel water filters. Or we can say that almost half of the world's population does not receive as much water as the inhabitants of Ancient Rome received 2000 years ago.

                      • About 6000 children die every day from illnesses related to lack of access to safe drinking water, proper sanitation and hygiene - these are about 20 large airliners per day.
                      • The distance that women in Africa and Asia have to walk on foot when hike for water is six kilometers.
                      • Tens of millions of children cannot go to school because they must bring water every day.

                      Che there you gurgled about my fantasies?
                      1. +5
                        20 March 2020 21: 18
                        Water technology should be built into a separate branch of science. At this stage, we are saying that all knowledge about Water needs to be classified and systematized. At this time, we are talking about the possibility or technology of desalination of large volumes, which in the future can be modified to suit various needs. The same technology provides for the purification of water from any, including radioactive contamination and large areas and volumes. The same technology provides for the use of Water as a fuel, by the method of its destruction and due to its own hydrological process properties. The same technology provides for the possibility of obtaining such qualitative properties of Water that previously could not be reproduced in any way.
                        1. +3
                          21 March 2020 06: 54
                          This reverse osmosis technology is called. Currently available to everyone.
                        2. +2
                          21 March 2020 10: 19
                          Absolutely not! I wonder why such a conclusion. How can osmosis be used for large volumes? How osmosis can extract the potential energy of a substance. You're not right
                      2. 0
                        20 March 2020 21: 28
                        NEXUS
                        Did not consider the version that after 100 years of humanity will not be at all? And your statement is as unprovable as this version, which you were informed about. In addition to reading, you must have understanding.
                        "Che there you gurgled about my fantasies?"
                        You gurgled, and obviously into a puddle. Watch your language, it’s an unpaired organ, a hamlo.
                      3. -3
                        21 March 2020 21: 10
                        It must be assumed that if there are a lot of billions of people who do not have clean water, as well as food, as well as medicines, clean air, etc., then they need to somehow give it all? It does not matter that they live in places that are not quite suitable for living for various reasons - natural, social. For example, in Central Asia, not everything is good in this regard, and the birth rate is very high. Let's give them water, food, medicine. What will happen? The better the living conditions, the more fertility will increase and again something will be missed. The problem is not the amount of water - the problem is the number of people, and this problem will ultimately be solved, if not by the people themselves, so by nature. I think she can do it just by snapping her fingers)))
        3. 0
          20 March 2020 20: 20
          Quote: NEXUS
          but the value of oil is very far-fetched

          Dear Andrey, I completely disagree with this thesis!
          Water is the source of life, but also the source of energy is also vital to civilization.
          It used to be wood (bonfire) then coal, now the main source of energy for cars is gasoline. Today, vehicles operating on petroleum products bring water to machines in yards. So nothing is far-fetched. Oil is needed today.
          1. +1
            20 March 2020 20: 35
            Quote: Alexey Sommer
            It used to be wood (bonfire) then coal, now the main source of energy for cars is gasoline.

            That is why dear Gridasov said about other sources of energy. And I added that ..
            Quote: NEXUS
            but without barbaric (through the knee) human intervention in the natural processes of recovery.

            And oil production is just the most fanciful way for the planet to get its favorite energy.
        4. Dog
          +1
          20 March 2020 23: 25
          Quote: NEXUS
          Now in some countries the price of water is many times higher than oil.

          And for beer in general, in most, if not all!
          And while beer is also a really valuable product.
          We get off the oil needle - all investments and the entire stabilization fund in the production of beer!
      2. 0
        20 March 2020 19: 48
        Quote: gridasov
        Humanity has no consolidated development

        The concept of "sustainable development".
        1. +1
          20 March 2020 20: 13
          Sustainable development concepts are aimed at developing individual economies and countries. I’m talking about concepts involving the development of all of humanity as a species relative to those civilizations that allow themselves to be present next to us. We must admit that just as we, in our evolution and development, are trying to preserve the primitive tribes in isolated parts of the planet, we are in some way controlled from self-destruction in the space of other developed civilizations, so that we do not show our presence in open form.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. +1
              20 March 2020 21: 58
              I expected such an answer. And I can say, once again, that I can’t describe the lack of mathematical technologies to process complex systems and can be used to describe global events. Therefore, I consciously say that a person uses information as he himself invented - he believed it was far from objective. To be specific, I’ll ask how scientists, for example, evaluate the impact of garbage islands on the speed of various ocean currents, which ultimately translate into evaporation rate and a lot other procedural phenomena. In short, give me at least one real recommendatory answer to how to maintain this sustainable development, within the framework of all the factors of influence taken into account. You just do not know how to do it!
          2. 0
            21 March 2020 01: 24
            Sustainable development concepts are aimed at developing individual economies and countries.
            The concept consists of 4 De. Deindustrialization, depopulation, desocialization and desuverinization. The goal is NWM, but by no means individual countries.
            ..we are in some way controlled from self-destruction in the space of other developed civilizations
            But they themselves periodically bomb and then flood the civilization. Good overseers, however.
      3. 0
        20 March 2020 20: 15
        The financial backstage is to blame for all the crises, and it is also the main beneficiary.
    2. +3
      20 March 2020 18: 51
      Scrabble and expert are two different things. Wasserman belongs to the first, that is, to walking knowledge bases. Which are usually in the hands of real analysts and managers
      1. +2
        20 March 2020 19: 47
        In the context of the voiced note, that humanity is in a fairly primitive stage of its development. The human brain is an analysis mechanism, primarily in the aspect of working with information. And there are no machine technologies, as they call it, we are not capable of analyzing large and even more highly dynamic complex transformations of this information. And if anyone speaks of serious analysts, then these are more often anomalies than educated abilities. And therefore it is worth talking about technology to expand the potential of the brain of any person. And this can be done solely on the basis of mathematics.
        1. +1
          20 March 2020 20: 38
          Quote: gridasov
          In the context of the voiced note, that humanity is in a fairly primitive stage of its development.

          That's right ... starting from the fact that to this day we use the invention of 5 thousand years ago, called the Wheel, and further down the list ... gunpowder, the same oil as an energy source (despite the fact that we use electricity relatively yesterday ) and so on ... examples of three cars typed.
          1. 0
            20 March 2020 20: 48
            An attempt to present the wheel in a new form, namely as a new and more effective process of transforming the environment in which it is located, so far, is not of interest.
    3. +2
      20 March 2020 19: 05
      By the way ... whatever you want, but I will say my personal opinion, observations and not panic, but a balanced and thought-out personal wang forecast ...

      This year is the beginning of the Great Depression of the 21st century ... I don’t know how long it will be. will depend on the "movements" of states ... now the dynamics by virtue of technology and development differs from 1929-1939, so I think that 2 years, then let's go up.

      Wars, yes, there will be. Are we going to participate? Yes, we will, like Afghanistan, Syria (not on our territory, perhaps we will take control of Ukraine), somewhere "by someone else's hands" Libya, Yemen ...

      March 25, the first cutoff, April 1-2, the second, April 14-15, the third - we clean whoever has the weapon and collect an alarming suitcase.

      We eat vitamins now, push out and squat. Whoever has the opportunity, go to shooting clubs. See the jumble, eat tasty and get ready if that)
      1. +4
        20 March 2020 19: 55
        Toilet paper needs to be purchased ... after the first cut-off?
    4. +1
      20 March 2020 20: 43
      Wesserman appeared in the media two or three years ago, and in advertising on the stove recently, indicating his growing rating. Where did he come from?
      1. +1
        20 March 2020 21: 23
        No one forces anyone to follow the arguments of Anatoly Wasserman. But not to listen to his reasoning as objectively unique in informational content is to be a suicide.
      2. +2
        21 March 2020 02: 47
        And where have lately come from, experts, all sorts of Kovtuns, on television? I came from Ukraine ....
        1. 0
          21 March 2020 22: 28
          So is he a migrant worker?
      3. +2
        21 March 2020 11: 11
        Quote: Nikolai Alexandrovich
        Where did he come from?

        He is the son of Wasserwuman ... laughing
        1. +1
          21 March 2020 22: 24
          Bravo !, Colleague.
    5. -1
      20 March 2020 21: 10
      Let my friend Wasserman tell you better about how a bunch of oligarchic monkeys reign in Russia. And that we are not just a colony, but a subcolony. And we can rave about the world economy without our "friend" Wasserman. Another magician for hanging noodles.
    6. 0
      20 March 2020 21: 44
      Quote: Paul Siebert
      Toilet paper needs to be purchased ... after the first cut-off?


      If a tanker, then it will not help)
      In general, my forecast is short-term, so we'll see) if you can take a screenshot and I’m 54 meters, or buckwheat from you)
    7. +1
      20 March 2020 21: 50
      By the loafing. Long and linear.
    8. 0
      20 March 2020 22: 33
      Directly not "Military Review", but a sect of idolaters of Wasserman. Shake the noodles off your ears. And let Wasserman better tell "Is there life on Mars?"
      1. 0
        21 March 2020 22: 32
        A good idea is to send Wasserman to Mars. And he already has experience of going out into outer space (judging by the advertising of an electric heating device).
    9. +1
      21 March 2020 02: 25
      Excuse me, but there is only one question ... And who is, in fact. this wasser man? And that's all, excuse me, if he were a significant specialist - he would not ruffle his vest for different "they say" there
    10. +3
      21 March 2020 02: 49
      First of all, I would like to clarify, in what area is Wasserman an expert?
      1. +1
        21 March 2020 04: 01
        In 2020 is not important. The main thing to write. Expert...
      2. +2
        21 March 2020 10: 11
        there are stereotypes in people's thinking. So Wasserman has a very important ability to see and reason with the deeper aspects of the interactions of various events. If it is easier to say, any opinion should take into account not only alternative views, but more extended ones. Therefore, I would appreciate such people precisely for their logical abilities to see alternatives to common views
        1. 0
          21 March 2020 22: 37
          What do you think: without glasses, he has "the ability to see alternatives with a common gaze"?
    11. 0
      21 March 2020 11: 40
      ... In his study, Khazin says that the main way for increasing labor productivity over a long period of time - its division - has its limits.

      It is noted that one of such limits is the global market, which simply has nowhere to expand further.

      According to Anatoly Wasserman, this would be enough for a crisis in the global economy, but additional factors are added. Wasserman, among other things, cites purely technological factors as an example of the “last drop” for the world economy.

      The limitation of market expansion by Khazin and technological factors by Wasserman lead to one main reason - the division of markets and in this regard, the development of contradictions.
      1. +1
        21 March 2020 22: 41
        The markets of about 300 years are divided, as long as there are contradictions, and what's new?
    12. IC
      0
      21 March 2020 15: 40
      The country has a clear oversupply of the so-called economists, political scientists, and lawyers. In an emergency, over 30 years, they became specialists in a market economy without any practical experience and education. There is no one who is only intelligently leading and working. It turned out that there was not even a second politician for the position of first person.
    13. +1
      22 March 2020 16: 55
      Quote: Mordvin 3
      Gridasov, do you drink vodka?

      In small doses - in any quantities. laughing
    14. +2
      22 March 2020 18: 20
      "Some are discussing how many kilograms of buckwheat and sugar need to be purchased in order to wait out the crisis, others are thinking on a larger scale, trying to find those responsible for the new round of the crisis in the global economy and about its causes in general."
      What is there to discuss? Everyone should purchase all available buckwheat, as well as sugar, within a radius of two kilometers from their place of residence.
      For some reason, unfairly ignore flour, potatoes and other root crops. It is also necessary to purchase a three-month supply of meat components.
      Again, one must not forget about the annual supply of tea, matches and cigarettes.

      And look at the person ... Will you gobble up all this?! .. No. Why buy it ?! The epidemic ...
      And who are the "initiators" of these epidemics ... Thank God we are not children. And they should be fully aware of it. When something happens very correctly and on time, look for who benefits from it.
    15. 0
      22 March 2020 19: 03
      Quote: Svarog
      In Russia, including. 250 ml. Costs 30 rubles ..

      Quote: Mitroha
      It’s expensive somewhere with you. In our store 5l. clean drinking water 37r.

      These are tricks of marketers, they teach this at business courses. A man tormented by thirst will give any money for a sip of water.
      A "5 liters of clean drinking water 37 rubles." - this is closer to the real cost of cleaning, bottling and the store's mark-up.
    16. 0
      22 March 2020 19: 19
      Quote: gridasov
      There is no fundamental basis in scientific and technological technology for obtaining a new quality of energy.

      We live on one of the plates of a supercapacitor with a capacity of one Farada. It is enough to close the plates and we get an inexhaustible stream of free energy.
    17. 0
      April 3 2020 16: 32
      Recently, there has been an increased erection of Wasserman in all mass media
    18. 0
      April 17 2020 06: 36
      Wasserman arouses double feelings in me. I appreciate him as a great scholar. But as an expert .. Here's a snag. People who want to say something or write often don’t carry their lively thoughts. This is everywhere. They either think of us as fools .. After all, possessing such erudition, you can open the whole world for us. And so continuous graphomania.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"