The Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy confirmed information on the development of the 5th generation submarine Husky (Laika)

The Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy confirmed information on the development of the 5th generation submarine Husky (Laika)

On the eve of the day of the submariner, the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy Nikolay Evmenov gave an interview to the departmental publication Red Star. One part of the interview was dedicated to nuclear submarines of already completed projects - 971 and 949.


Admiral Evmenov noted that the repair and modernization of submarines of project 949 (originally “Granite”) and 971 (initially “Pike-B”) can almost double the life of these nuclear submarines.

It should be noted that the nuclear submarine of project 949 Granite was transformed into Antei project 949A. It is about the development and modernization of this project that is being discussed. The project of modernization of these submarines was developed by specialists of the Rubin Design and Design Bureau in 2011.

The successors to Project 971 Schuka-B are the submarine projects 885 Yasen and 885M Yasen-M. The lead submarine nuclear submarine of Project 885 Ash is the submarine Severodvinsk.

Admiral Evmenov:

Nuclear submarine Vepr, related to project 971, will return to fleet already in April - immediately after the completion of repair and modernization work.

He told the commander in chief about the work on creating submarines of the 5th generation. We are talking about promising nuclear-powered ships of the Husky (or Laika) project. These submarines are planned to be equipped with hypersonic anti-ship weapons. We are talking about such missiles as the Zircon, which is already undergoing tests in the Navy. The estimated timing of the deployment of a new generation of nuclear submarines in the Russian Navy is not yet known. Earlier it was suggested that the Husky submarines will receive a new version of the nuclear reactor.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Timofey Cherepov 18 March 2020 07: 55 New
    • 13
    • 7
    +6
    Build more, build more modern and we will live peacefully. Glory to the submariners and designers of the Russian Federation!
    1. Butchcassidy 18 March 2020 08: 00 New
      • 29
      • 28
      +1
      This is all Putin specifically for you to vote for constitutional amendments! Do not believe it! Russia needs large pensions and a small retirement age!
      He specifically does this in order to fool you, he pulls old people and children out of his mouth, he let the country go around the world, for which he is developing new submarines! The glory of North Korea does not give Putin peace!

      (If that’s a banter about what the liberals have divorced here on amendments to the Constitution).
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Volodin 18 March 2020 08: 06 New
        • 17
        • 6
        +11
        Quote: ButchCassidy
        Russia needs large pensions and a small retirement age! If it’s a banter about what liberals have bred here on amendments to the Constitution

        Banter - it is, of course, great ... But what, Russia does not need large pensions? ..
        1. Mavrikiy 18 March 2020 08: 21 New
          • 14
          • 3
          +11
          Quote: Volodin
          Banter - it is, of course, great ... But what, Russia does not need large pensions? ..

          The issue of price. He always stood everywhere. So, if for large pensions, it’s not the USSR, but the Russian Federation that must be handed over for spare parts to the USA or China, then we are all against it! angry
          1. Volodin 18 March 2020 08: 32 New
            • 9
            • 2
            +7
            Quote: Mavrikiy
            The issue of price. He always stood everywhere. So, if for large pensions, it’s not the USSR, but the Russian Federation that must be handed over for spare parts to the USA or China, then we are all against it!

            I have always believed that Russia has enough resources to provide decent pensions - without "putting the country in the United States and China for spare parts." When the country was handed over for parts, there was no country, no pensions.
            1. carstorm 11 18 March 2020 08: 42 New
              • 9
              • 2
              +7
              official expenses of the pension fund 7.15 trillion rubles for 2018. all state revenues for the same year in my opinion something like 16 trillion. FIG knows about enough resources ...
            2. orionvitt 18 March 2020 08: 46 New
              • 12
              • 1
              +11
              Quote: Volodin
              Russia has enough resources

              Resources are of course enough. There are many enemies. And the most terrible, not outside, but inside. Since the 90s, they have dug in. And now the new generation has grown up, "young, fashionable and creative."
            3. Mavrikiy 18 March 2020 09: 19 New
              • 2
              • 7
              -5
              Quote: Volodin
              I always figured
              Russia has the most resources in the world and what? If they do not belong to her or her people. fool Everyone can be mistaken, even in a tie, hat and glasses.
              Under modern government, the last pants will be tax deductible and a sweet smile.
              Situation. He lived in an apartment for 30 years and did not privatize. The house was demolished (lucky), forced to privatize and immediately bought in exchange for a new apartment, but .... they say they sold it, that means they had income, pay tax, because they did not own the apartment for more than 3 years (according to the law, tax exemption). Where is the logic, brother? fool
              1. carstorm 11 18 March 2020 11: 20 New
                • 4
                • 1
                +3
                financial transaction. do not care about how you committed it. privatizing it, too, was not hindered by anything but laziness) you are looking for logic in the wrong place. that’s where the logic is that you haven’t even privatized housing for so many years?) ask yourself this question. you will forgive me for harshness, but apart from your other fault, there is no fault in this situation. you will pay for your laziness.
                1. Mavrikiy 18 March 2020 13: 18 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: carstorm 11
                  your other fault is not in this situation. you will pay for your laziness.

                  Did I have to privatize housing? Okts.
                  where is the logic that you have not even privatized housing for so many years? I did not want to be an owner, in principle.
                  Financial transaction? A stupid exchange, meters to meters, but the state decided to tear three skins from the rams (its citizens), they do not consider it differently.
                  1. carstorm 11 18 March 2020 14: 06 New
                    • 4
                    • 1
                    +3
                    not required. You can live in housing that does not belong to you even to the point. just do not forget that for any operations with housing you need at least its owner. As for the fight, I repeat, you yourself did not privatize the housing. although they could have done this and not have these difficulties. but you’re talking about some kind of principle that is sorry but borders on stupidity. Do not make a car and ride by proxy? because the main document that it is yours is the contract of sale. Real estate is an asset. and big. and documents on it should be all that the law requires. a non-privatized apartment cannot be bequeathed or inherited by law - it is owned by the municipality or the state with which the deceased citizen concluded a tenancy agreement. Relatives and dependents of the deceased cannot apply for state or municipal housing.
                    Real estate only becomes the property of a citizen residing in it when it goes through the privatization procedure (transfer of municipal or state real estate to private property) and registers the right of ownership with the authorities of Rosreestr. you can even give it to the children.
        2. Butchcassidy 18 March 2020 08: 41 New
          • 14
          • 8
          +6
          Quote: Volodin
          Banter - it is, of course, great ... But what, Russia does not need large pensions and dignified living old people? ..

          But was it possible to achieve somewhere in a big country without strong defense and security? You are being asked to amend the obligation to index pensions in the Constitution. So that no government can change them. Like it or not, Putin is a statesman, not a politician. He is already in history. If you find all the fullness of power that he has under the Yeltsin Constitution, someone else does not know where our country would be. Forgot about the attacks? Forgot about the civil war? Forgot about "take as much sovereignty as you want"? Now Putin is transferring a substantial part of the presidential power to the State Duma and the Constitutional Court and is strengthening the powers of the State Council, which is called upon to formulate strategic documents. Is this not enough for you?

          Now the issue is being resolved so that, if necessary, he has the opportunity to run for President. Have you forgotten how the US vice president came to the Kremlin and persuaded Putin not to run for election? What's the problem? Now the country and the whole world are entering a new era. Turbulence, the closure of borders, the threat of military action on our borders ... have heard the saying: do not change horses at the crossing? So now just a "crossing" is possible. And what else.

          In Italy, the state failed. Do you want the same in Russia? Me not.
        3. xvot 18 March 2020 08: 57 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          in the world of capitalism, as soon as pensions rise and wages rise there too
        4. venik 18 March 2020 09: 39 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: Volodin
          Banter - it is, of course, great ... But what, Russia does not need large pensions? ..

          ========
          But what, Russia does not need a powerful Army and Navy ???
          PS Of course, there must be both that and another (and powerful sun and high pensions) .... But to oppose one to the other, forgive me delirium and stupidity! request
          You can, of course, take yes and cut back the state defense order and raise the pension due to this .... AND WHAT NEXT? The state defense order will be reduced - dozens (or maybe hundreds) of enterprises will be on the brink of ruin, and tens and hundreds of thousands of people will be "on the street", without a livelihood! And what about settlements where exactly the enterprises of the "defense industry" are "city-forming" ??? What should they do?
          Here it is necessary to think, HOW to develop the economy as a whole - then budget revenues will increase and pensions can be raised and the state defense order not “cut” and retained qualified personnel .....
          PPS Who wants to "throw slippers" I warn: he himself is a pensioner and pension is "not good news" .....
        5. Michael67 18 March 2020 14: 41 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          An article that good boats are upgrading. This is the main thing and it is very good!
        6. The comment was deleted.
      3. Timofey Cherepov 18 March 2020 08: 11 New
        • 9
        • 8
        +1
        Ask the toad in yourself first, rummaging about Russia? Help a neighbor (porch, house, district).
        1. Tiksi-3 18 March 2020 08: 53 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Quote: Timothy Cherepov
          care about Russia?

          bake pies and cupcakes -uchi RUSSIAN, the language of Dostoevsky and Tolstoy ...... come in handy
      4. Mavrikiy 18 March 2020 08: 47 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: ButchCassidy
        If it’s a banter about what liberals have bred here on amendments to the Constitution
        The trouble, received from me. request From the beginning: banter, and then explanations in small letters. repeat The end no one reads and does not delve into, after you, "Our Sun" (Well, this is to Andrei Shkolnikov, well done) .... debunked request
        1. Butchcassidy 18 March 2020 09: 00 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          The trouble, received from me. From the beginning: banter, and then explanations in small letters. The end no one reads and does not delve into, after you, "Our Sun" (Well, this is to Andrei Shkolnikov, well done) .... debunked

          Yes, I already noticed that they rubbed my comment. If possible, the explanation at the end, highlight in bold))
        2. Souchastnik 18 March 2020 09: 00 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          End no one reads

          It’s bad that nobody practically reads to us. They grabbed the phrase and let's build and refute the version. Read, realize, maybe there will be less criticism and no argument.
      5. Xnumx vis 18 March 2020 09: 15 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Damn, I was indignant and slapped a minus !! am You at the very beginning of your opus smile emoticon! lol And then I began to read and almost immediately recognized the words of my cousin from Ukrainian soap! wassat Very similar . one to one ...
    2. Tiksi-3 18 March 2020 08: 08 New
      • 5
      • 15
      -10
      Well, if the admiral says - Admiral Evmenov noted that the repair and modernization of submarines of project 949 "Granite», then just kapets, the boat Antey call it the main caliber
      1. Timofey Cherepov 18 March 2020 08: 12 New
        • 8
        • 7
        +1
        Are you a submariner? or on a catamaran in a pond?
        1. Tiksi-3 18 March 2020 08: 40 New
          • 3
          • 10
          -7
          Quote: Timothy Cherepov
          Are you a submariner? or on a catamaran in a pond?

          poke yourself in a tender place ..... with your finger
        2. Mavrikiy 18 March 2020 09: 03 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Rude, but ..... Wiki - authority:
          Submarines of project 949 code "Granite" - a series of Russian submarines with cruise missiles "Granite". According to NATO classification - "Oscar-I". After the construction of two submarines, production continued under the improved project 949A Antey.
          All the same journalist. Bukovka back and forth ... request
      2. Glory1974 18 March 2020 08: 35 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        repair and modernization of submarines of project 949 "Granite"

        also cut eyes. But it’s unlikely that this is the admiral, but rather the journalist confused.
        1. Podvodnik 18 March 2020 08: 59 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          The boats of this project have always been called "Granite." There is no mistake. It is common, regardless of housing and modernization. There is also the name "Baton" - in the form of a corps, but it is "folk". 971- "Leopards" in the first building (in the north, anyway) or "Beasts".
          1. Glory1974 18 March 2020 09: 32 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            The boats of this project have always been called "Granite"

            and which boats were called "Antaeus"?
            Missiles are also called "Granite"?
            1. Podvodnik 18 March 2020 09: 51 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              I was at Sevmash, saw the banner "Antey". Outwardly the same "Granite". I didn’t specifically serve them, as I understood it, they called the next modernization of Granite. “Boar” from “Barca” is also different, but “Beasts” and “Beasts”. Weapons are also developing. The Granite rocket has also been modernized. But for all the time of service, "Granites" have always been "Granites". The whole line. No one called Antei. Never heard. Didn’t take root. More often "Baton".
              1. rudolff 18 March 2020 11: 44 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                You didn’t find it when the sailor Kuzmin eight shot on the Vepr? If memory serves, in the 98th fall.
            2. Grits 18 March 2020 10: 52 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: glory1974
              and which boats were called "Antaeus"?

              No one in the people called them Antei. Called Granites. Like the Typhoon, only the Shark was called.
          2. Grits 18 March 2020 10: 50 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Podvodnik
            The boats of this project have always been called "Granite." There is no mistake. It is common, regardless of housing and modernization. There is also the name "Baton" - in the form of a corps, but it is "folk". 971- "Leopards" in the first building (in the north, anyway) or "Beasts".

            All right. And all 4 of Nizhny Novgorod - Barracudami. Regardless of the cipher.
      3. Grits 18 March 2020 10: 48 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Tiksi-3
        Well, if the admiral says - Admiral Evmenov noted that the repair and modernization of submarines of project 949 "Granite", then just kapets, Antei’s boat to call it the main caliber

        Why are you surprised? I worked for 9 years in Severodvinsk, while these boats were being built. There they were called just that - Granites. Well, sometimes even Batons.
      4. ANB
        ANB 18 March 2020 15: 47 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        In fact, submariners have always called granite all “loaves”.
    3. Mavrikiy 18 March 2020 08: 16 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      That's right, a strong army, a whole country, and pensioners will be alive. And fat businessman-patriots "overboard"!
      1. alma 18 March 2020 08: 36 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        So they have a belly and so overboard, here they only eat.
        1. Mavrikiy 18 March 2020 08: 38 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Quote: alma
          So they have a belly and so overboard, here they only eat.

          It’s debatable, they eat and shit here, and belly tama? repeat
      2. Butchcassidy 18 March 2020 09: 01 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        I'm not fat. Moderately plump man in full bloom))
        And the meaning of what I said, I think, is now clear.
    4. Chersky 18 March 2020 08: 45 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Glory to the submariners and designers of the Russian Federation!

      What kind of May Day slogans?)
  2. KJIETyc 18 March 2020 08: 05 New
    • 2
    • 7
    -5
    Quote: ButchCassidy
    This is all Putin specifically for you to vote for constitutional amendments! Do not believe it! Russia needs large pensions and a small retirement age!
    He specifically does this in order to fool you, he pulls old people and children out of his mouth, he let the country go around the world, for which he is developing new submarines! The glory of North Korea does not give Putin peace!

    (If that’s a banter about what the liberals have divorced here on amendments to the Constitution).

    Did coronavirus not Putin do something in his personal account?
    1. Butchcassidy 18 March 2020 08: 42 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: KJIETyc
      Did coronavirus not Putin do something in his personal account?


      But what about))) specially for that, on all our borders, the Pentagon built microbiological laboratories
  3. Mountain shooter 18 March 2020 08: 24 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Will the LMT reactor be revived? Boats with such a reactor were - uh !!! Could not cope with the operation ... It turned out to be expensive, the resource worked faster than the estimated time. But in a new round of technologies, with new materials and the composition of iron-ore materials - maybe it will be even better ...
  4. Sailor 18 March 2020 08: 37 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Still pr.945 and 945A would not forget to upgrade, they are generally eternal!
  5. Andrei Nikolaevich 18 March 2020 09: 15 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    More submarines and good and necessary. And a comfortable life, our submarine in the military garrisons! People deserve it!
  6. Zaurbek 18 March 2020 09: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Our mastered on the submarines periscopes that do not go and a sturdy case? I watched some kind of smart show about western boats and they said that they put on such new projects and they are multi-channel with a thermal imager.
    1. garri-lin 18 March 2020 10: 55 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The question is why is this? The range at which from the periscope is visible you know? Periscope is a symbol of the dash rudiment. Even with a thermal imager. For small submarines, only relevant.
  7. megadeth 18 March 2020 10: 49 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Even third-graders know about the “Husky" ... Navy Commander Nikolai Evmenov, the question is: - "WHERE THE SEA" !!!
  8. Grits 18 March 2020 11: 00 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    In the title picture, the submariner is most likely behind the steering wheel control panel. since it holds onto the handles of the KGR and BP (rudders) and a schematic drawing of the boat with indications of trim, roll, depth, level of deflection of the rudders. This is clearly a modern replacement for the Korund naval traffic control system, which I set up on the submarines for many years. Beauty, of course. In the 90s, they did not even dream of such monitors.
  9. Old26 18 March 2020 21: 52 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Podvodnik
    The boats of this project have always been called "Granite"

    In fact, the commander himself blurted out without thinking. Project 949 Granite is 2 submarines K-525 Arkhangelsk and K-206 Murmansk (before that, the Minsk Komsomolets). Both were disposed of in 2004. All other boats were built according to the improved project 949A Antey. Accordingly, the first 2 boats according to NATO classification were designated "Oscar-1" (Project 949 "Granite") and "Oscar-2" (Project 949A "Antei").
    Therefore, the phrase admiral
    Admiral Evmenov noted that the repair and modernization of submarines of project 949 (originally "Granite")

    devoid of meaning. The boats of this project were disposed of 16 years ago.
    Who made the "blunder" - admiral or journalist - I do not know. Nevertheless, a "blunder"

    Quote: Gritsa
    Quote: glory1974
    and which boats were called "Antaeus"?

    No one in the people called them Antei. Called Granites. Like the Typhoon, only the Shark was called.

    Maybe where they were built it was. For the rest, until a certain time, “Typhoons” remained “Typhoons,” as from “Callback” in a report to the next congress of L.I. Brezhnev. And only lovers of the history of the fleet could know that "Typhoon" is the western designation of the boat. By the way, for the time being, the name of this project was unknown to us. It was only in the late 90s that our designations of projects in directories (in particular with Pavlov) and others began to appear
    My colleague at work, my father served on project 949A. And he always called this project "Antei". He said that the former were of another Granit project ...