The power structures called the main obstacle to the reconnaissance of NATO ships off the Crimean coast

62

The ships of the North Atlantic Alliance conduct reconnaissance off the coast of Crimea, trying to penetrate the digital and communication networks of the peninsula. The most effective counteraction to them is provided by coastal electronic warfare systems (EW).

About this edition RIA News said the interlocutor working in the power structures of the Crimea.



Russian electronic warfare systems have shown high efficiency in the face of real opposition. Therefore, the ships of the Alliance have no choice but to turn around and leave.

The source explained that electronic warfare makes NATO intelligence equipment useless. In addition, they bring down the navigational settings of foreign warships approaching the sea borders of the Russian Federation. Their crews get the wrong coordinates and lose their orientation. Thus, reconnaissance from the sea of ​​the Crimean coast loses its meaning.

Over the past few years, cases of NATO ships approaching the Black Sea borders of the Russian Federation have become more frequent. This is happening under the pretext of the struggle of the North Atlantic Alliance with the “Russian threat”. In the summer of 2019, a video appeared where NATO calls Russia one of the main threats to the security of the Alliance. They are trying to carry out reconnaissance both from the ships of the Black Sea members of the western military block, and from the ships of the countries that enter the Black Sea, while still observing the Montreux Convention.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    62 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +17
      16 March 2020 10: 46
      Already my heart rejoices at such news! Somehow it has already become a stereotype that Russia is lagging behind in electronics! But no!
      1. 0
        16 March 2020 10: 49
        The RIA Novosti was told about this by an interlocutor working in the power structures of the Crimea.

        Yeah, he took and leaked all the secrets of Russian electronic warfare systems to NATO ... kindergarten.
        Feeling the strength of our border is happening every day ... in the air, at sea and on land ... the enemy is looking for our weaknesses.
        1. +5
          16 March 2020 10: 58
          Well, okay, what’s the secret here, if the enemy is already feeling resistance. The main thing here is that no one would merge different technical parameters, frequencies, algorithms and so on there (I'm not really in the topic like that). And it’s also important that they didn’t stop there, otherwise, from that side, they are not fools either. In order to feel that used to find a way to break through.
        2. -1
          17 March 2020 12: 20
          the enemy is looking for our weak points.

          What enemy are you talking about?
      2. +12
        16 March 2020 11: 04
        Quote: serg.shishkov2015
        Already my heart rejoices at such news! Somehow it has already become a stereotype that Russia is lagging behind in electronics! But no!

        Here it is no longer in "electronics", but in the ability to use what we have. And our scientists knew how to do this back in the days of the USSR. Creating masterpieces
        Over the past few years, cases of NATO ships approaching the Black Sea borders of the Russian Federation have become more frequent.
        And not only ships, US UAVs sometimes fly to the Crimea every week, and sometimes several times ...



        1. +32
          16 March 2020 11: 09
          US UAVs sometimes fly to Crimea every week, and sometimes several times ...

          Crimea is the southern flank of Russia, and if Putin didn’t knock out this bridgehead from under NATO’s nose in time, we would be ill ... here I am 100% in agreement with Putin.
          1. +9
            16 March 2020 11: 10
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            Crimea is the southern flank of Russia, and if Putin didn’t knock out this bridgehead from under NATO’s nose in time, we would be ill ... here I am 100% in agreement with Putin.

            I agree ...
          2. +3
            16 March 2020 11: 45
            Quote: The same Lech
            US UAVs sometimes fly to Crimea every week, and sometimes several times ...

            Crimea is the southern flank of Russia, and if Putin didn’t knock out this bridgehead from under NATO’s nose in time, we would be ill ... here I am 100% in agreement with Putin.

            There should be no doubt.
          3. +8
            16 March 2020 12: 02
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            Crimea is the southern flank of Russia, and if Putin didn’t knock this bridgehead out of NATO’s nose in time, we would be in a bad mood ...

            It is a pity that the entire New Russia of the Russian Empire, from Odessa to Kharkov, was not "knocked out" at that time.
        2. +6
          16 March 2020 11: 23
          Sergei! I agree with that. The interference theory, on which the jamming algorithms are based on modern electronic warfare techniques, was developed in the USSR - at MPEI under the supervision of Academician Kotelnikov and in Leningrad, at the LPI at the faculty of EED. Currently, the technique is such that, if desired, you can either drown or land the UAV. But why run up - they are simply blinded.
          1. +2
            16 March 2020 13: 19
            Quote: mikh-korsakov
            Currently, the technique is such that, if desired, you can either drown or land the UAV.

            And not just UAVs. I remember in Norway in November 2018, Russia was accused of signal distortion
            GPS when the frigate Helge Ingstad with a tanker sank.
        3. +4
          16 March 2020 16: 50
          Quote: svp67
          Here it is no longer in "electronics", but in the ability to use what we have.

          It is in electronics. I'm tired of explaining that electronics are far from just fashionable smartphones and gaming video cards. What most of the young (and not only) "experts" are piously sure of.
      3. +10
        16 March 2020 12: 14
        Electronics and electronic base are two different things. It is possible to make a device on lamps that nanotechnology is not available. For example, radiation resistance.

        ,
        1. +7
          16 March 2020 14: 23
          Anatoly! There is such a thing. Once upon a time I foolishly put a device containing semiconductor devices in a "hot chamber", as it seemed to me, to make the whole system more compact and reduce gas lines. The result was disastrous. I had to call from the company - to fix it. But the prehistoric recount B-2 on lamps, which was created in the days of Kurchatov, could be poked anywhere
        2. +2
          16 March 2020 17: 30
          Quote: antchar
          It is possible to make a device on lamps that nanotechnology is not available.

          But these devices will be more bulky and heavy, and then do not be surprised that we still do not have modern mass shock UAVs with a long range
          1. 0
            16 March 2020 19: 18
            But only these devices will be more bulky and heavy ... along the way the ancient SPN-30 (popularly nicknamed Cheburashka) is still a relevant topic, and evil tongues say that Kolchuga made a lot of noise in the west. the same along the tube
            1. +1
              16 March 2020 23: 48
              On land, and the sea will fit.
      4. +1
        16 March 2020 15: 17
        EW is the best in the world. And much more
    2. +1
      16 March 2020 10: 48
      and NATO in fact threw a claim?
      1. +4
        16 March 2020 10: 57
        and NATO in fact threw a claim?

        It’s all within the framework of international law ... what claims can be here ... what is your evidence.
      2. +26
        16 March 2020 11: 08
        Quote: The Stoker
        and NATO in fact threw a claim?

        No need to climb in dirty galoshes wherever you hit! negative Especially if you were not called there, because ...
        .
      3. +11
        16 March 2020 11: 13
        Thank you.
        They made a laugh.
        He presented a note to the State Department, turn off your electronic warfare funds, and interfere with intelligence.
      4. +2
        16 March 2020 11: 47
        Quote: The Stoker
        and NATO in fact threw a claim?

        They should be satisfied that at least they do not knock down, but only blind.
      5. +3
        16 March 2020 13: 26
        Quote: The Stoker
        and NATO in fact threw a claim?

        "Since 2016, Russia has used satellite navigation disorientation technology about ten thousand times off the coast of the occupied Crimea. Deliberate distortion of GPS signals has also been recorded in the Mediterranean Sea, the Gulf of Finland, in the water area of ​​the port of Vladivostok. The evidence is in the report of the American non-governmental analytical organization C4ADS."
        More details here: http://seafarers.com.ua/russian-gps-spoofing/16149/
    3. +9
      16 March 2020 10: 52
      The power structures called the main obstacle to the reconnaissance of NATO ships off the Crimean coast

      They were not called here ... everything, there’s nothing more to talk about.
      1. +3
        16 March 2020 10: 59
        They were not called here

        Naturally ... like Hitler ... like Napoleon ... everything is old like an apple of discord from the time of Noah ... they themselves will come to us ... once every 100 years they need to be vaccinated against the invasion of Russia.
        1. +2
          16 March 2020 11: 30
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          they need to be vaccinated against the invasion of Russia.

          All right, yes it hurt the weapon became destructive ... down to the fatal one! I don’t want to see the final arm
        2. +2
          16 March 2020 12: 09
          everything is old like an apple of discord since the days of Noah.

          good
          Correctly! Let analysts break their heads!
      2. +4
        16 March 2020 11: 04
        And they have no interests in Crimea, it all "floated away" ...
        1. +5
          16 March 2020 11: 31
          Therefore, they now have an interest, because Crimea sailed to US, and not to where they wanted to see it.
          1. +5
            16 March 2020 11: 47
            Now let the back of your head scratch and look for your interest elsewhere ...
            1. +2
              16 March 2020 11: 57
              Yes, but it’s painfully dull and cunning! Behind them you need an eye, but an eye ... or better, the entire arsenal of intelligence, control means.
              1. +3
                16 March 2020 12: 10
                Yeah and "noise" in the ears for the rest of your life ...
                1. +2
                  16 March 2020 12: 11
                  Put a couple of firecrackers where you need and burn! However, for another pair there will be application.
            2. +5
              16 March 2020 12: 01
              Quote: cniza
              Now let the back of your head scratch and look for your interest elsewhere ...

              That's it, nefig to roam under the windows of others and bathe putty ... am
              1. +4
                16 March 2020 12: 12
                Drive them with a filthy broom and turn on the "shugalka" louder ...
                1. 0
                  16 March 2020 19: 26
                  and turn on the "shugalku" louder ...... Cord and louder, in decibels so 160
      3. +1
        16 March 2020 11: 15
        In principle, everyday work, they feel weak for us, we respond in the same way.
        For not fig. We also want to know what is there and where they have it, but how it works. Useful.
        1. +2
          16 March 2020 11: 33
          Quote: YOUR
          In principle, ordinary work,

          This is true, for intelligence, at least some, at least whose, such a job! Smell everything, find out!
          1. +4
            16 March 2020 11: 51
            And at the counter intelligence, break off this scent and "tuck the horns in your ears" ...
            1. +2
              16 March 2020 11: 59
              This is natural. To advance their intelligence tools closer to them .... and tsuzu to fix obstacles, up to ....
      4. +1
        16 March 2020 11: 50
        Quote: rocket757
        They were not called here ... everything, there’s nothing more to talk about.

        You can imagine how much screeching there would be if a Russian UAV hung in the area of ​​the Norfolk Naval Naval Base.
        1. +2
          16 March 2020 12: 01
          There would be a screech, it’s understandable ... but I’d still have fun in the capture / interception ....
    4. +2
      16 March 2020 11: 03
      Their crews get the wrong coordinates and lose their orientation

      Disoriented and demoralized ... the main thing is that they would not have stuck in some lighthouse .... laughing
      1. +2
        16 March 2020 11: 13
        Disoriented and demoralized ... the main thing is that they would not have stuck in some lighthouse ....

        Yes, there is such a risk ... so many ships at the bottom of the Black Sea, mother do not cry.
        1. +1
          16 March 2020 11: 17
          And not only ships, but also mines!
        2. +2
          16 March 2020 11: 54
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          Yes, there is such a risk ... so many ships at the bottom of the Black Sea, mother do not cry.

          Let them get used to it, "As a person gets used to everything, so Mu-mu got used to city life."
    5. 0
      16 March 2020 11: 11
      electronic warfare makes NATO reconnaissance equipment useless. In addition, they bring down the navigational settings of foreign warships approaching the sea borders of the Russian Federation. Their crews get the wrong coordinates and lose their orientation. Thus, reconnaissance from the sea of ​​the Crimean coast loses its meaning.

      What will happen when all of a sudden the opponents massively start smokering each other along orbital groups? The American group is the largest. For this reason, and the most vulnerable to exposure.
    6. -1
      16 March 2020 11: 18
      Here are the questions.
      I would like to understand how EW can impede the operation of passive RTR means, or at least to guess the fact of their work?
      1. -2
        16 March 2020 11: 32
        Well, why are you like this? Breaking high on fellow citizens. fellow
        Of course, we are talking about barriers in frequency interference. When a scout flies, the electronic warfare interferes so that our radio-electronic equipment can no longer work. Therefore, RTR does not detect anything but interference. laughing
        1. -1
          16 March 2020 11: 41
          I honestly waited while I enjoyed smile
          1. -2
            16 March 2020 11: 44
            Quote: Avior
            I honestly waited while I enjoyed smile

            laughing good Well then you have one more +
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. -4
          16 March 2020 11: 42
          moreover, all communication frequencies, who knows which particular adversary is currently listening smile
      3. 0
        16 March 2020 13: 19
        Quote: Avior
        I would like to understand how EW can impede the operation of passive RTR means, or at least to guess the fact of their work?

        You noticed everything correctly, because the article was apparently written by an illiterate author who does not understand that if our electronic warfare systems begin to work actively, they will primarily suppress our communication and control systems in the first place, which is why the use of electronic warfare in peacetime is extremely limited.
        And in wartime they think first of all what effect will be from the use of electronic warfare, if our networks work in the same band with enemy networks.
        Using reconnaissance ships in the Black Sea is now simply ruinous for Americans, because a large number of American bases around our country (Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Greece) and UAVs allow them to take from a stationary position almost everything that interests them in the field of electronic intelligence. And given optoelectronic systems for UAVs, it can be predicted that they will receive more information in one daily flight than a reconnaissance ship in that same time.
    7. The comment was deleted.
      1. +3
        16 March 2020 12: 04
        "While the enemy is drawing maps of the offensive, we change the landscapes, and manually. When the time comes for the attack, the enemy is lost in unfamiliar terrain and comes into full sky-readiness." (from)
    8. +1
      16 March 2020 12: 11
      They would finish the delivery vehicles and test it.
      "Alabuga." This is a missile whose warhead is a high-frequency generator of high-power electromagnetic field.
      According to active pulsed radiation, a kind of nuclear explosion is obtained, only without a radioactive component. Field tests showed the high efficiency of the unit - not only electronic, but also conventional electronic equipment of wired architecture, fails within a radius of 3,5 km. Those. not only removes the main communication headsets from normal operation, blinding and stunning the enemy, but actually leaves the whole unit without any local electronic control systems, including weapons.
      The advantages of such a “non-lethal” defeat are obvious - the enemy will only have to surrender, and the equipment can be obtained as a trophy.
    9. +4
      16 March 2020 12: 30
      The power structures called the main obstacle to the reconnaissance of NATO ships off the Crimean coast

      Now "all the scarecrows" and representatives of the "Promised Land" will emerge with their "incontestable calculations."
      And in response, I will lay out to them, only not classified in Russia, but available to the media, information.
      - ZGRLS "Container", 4 pcs. are located in Mordovia, Kalmykia, Amur region, in the Far East (in Zeya, which in aggregate,) covers the whole of Europe, Central Asia, China, Japan, both Koreas and the Middle East.
      - means of electronic warfare - "Borisoglebsk", "Judoist", "R-378", "Leer"
      Together, they suppress communication lines, including "cellular", GSM standards, and GPS navigation. As a result, they block the electronic information control of the enemy, as well as organize the sending of "necessary SMS" to the phones of the "enemy" for misinformation. (in practice it was applied in Crimea, when all
      the garrisons of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were without communication with the General Staff in Kiev). Even the CIA had no information about the "events in Sevastopol" for 3 days.
      - "Sickle" - directed email. a magnetic beam that stops the exchange of signals between the UAV and the operator. On frequencies: GPS, Wi-Fi, GSM and even GLONASS. Disables UAV navigation equipment within a radius of up to 20 km. First presented at the forum - "Army 2018" (which means it has already been declassified).
      And in order not to be an unfounded propagandist of the patriotism of their Motherland, in the eyes of the "all-fledged", I quote them the statement of the current head of command
      special operations of the US Armed Forces, General Raymond Thomas:
      "At the moment in Syria we are in the most aggressive environment of electronic warfare from our opponents. They test us for our strength every day, suppress our communications and disable them, even our EU-130. (the most modern electronic warfare aircraft in the Air Force USA).
      Do you think that the United States is simply not eager to openly intercede for Erdogan, especially for the "Polish-Baltic-Ukrainian schizos." The United States realized that it had missed the restoration of Russia's modern defense capability. In an open "battle" it is too tough for them.
      Now they will act in the old way - trying to destroy Russia inside (like the USSR). And in this soil we still have a lot left - "humus". The second option is to drive a wedge between Russia and China. In this they are great masters, with centuries of practice. And to be Russia, or not to be, has always depended on the firmness of the Russian spirit, its spiritual morality, regardless of material possibilities.
      That is now trying to erode, by all means, both from the outside and using internal "humus". (sorry, there are a lot of letters, but this is the very minimum Yes )
    10. 0
      16 March 2020 12: 30
      And it would be nice to take our EWs into the sea on some sort of ships, so as not to torment the NATO troops by approaching our borders.
    11. +1
      16 March 2020 12: 51
      It’s good when you can measure systems without human loss.
      "- Actually, I'm very brave," Tweedledee said, lowering his voice. "Only today I have a headache!
      But Thrall heard him.
      - And my tooth hurts! He cried. “It hurts me more than you!”
      “Then do not fight today,” Alice rejoiced. She so wanted to reconcile them.
      “We still have to fight a little,” said Trulyalya. “But I do not insist on a long fight.” What time is it now?
      Tralia looked at his watch and said:
      - Half past five.
      “We will fight until six o’clock, and then we will have lunch,” suggested Trulyalya,
      “Well,” answered Thrall with a sigh, “decided.” And let her look!
      And turning to Alice, he added:
      “Don't come very close!” When I get out, I crush everything that falls into my arm!
      - And I crush everything that falls under my foot! Cried Trulyalya.
      Alice laughed.
      - That's right, the trees are getting from you! - she said.
      Trulyalya looked around with a pleased smile.
      “By the time the fight is over,” he said, “not a single tree will be left around!” Not one in the whole forest!
      “And all because of the rattle!” She said, still hoping they would be a little ashamed.
      “I wouldn't say a word to him,” Tweedledee replied. - But it was brand new!
    12. 0
      16 March 2020 22: 04
      penetrate digital and communication networks

      Clearly, this is a quote. Quotation from the speech of an unnamed interlocutor whose thought the author of the news either did not hear or misunderstood.
      Perhaps it depends on what he thought - head or brain.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"