The power structures called the main obstacle to the reconnaissance of NATO ships off the Crimean coast


The ships of the North Atlantic Alliance conduct reconnaissance off the coast of Crimea, trying to penetrate the digital and communication networks of the peninsula. The most effective counteraction to them is provided by coastal electronic warfare systems (EW).


About this edition RIA News said the interlocutor working in the power structures of the Crimea.

Russian electronic warfare systems have shown high efficiency in the face of real opposition. Therefore, the ships of the Alliance have no choice but to turn around and leave.

The source explained that electronic warfare makes NATO intelligence equipment useless. In addition, they bring down the navigational settings of foreign warships approaching the sea borders of the Russian Federation. Their crews get the wrong coordinates and lose their orientation. Thus, reconnaissance from the sea of ​​the Crimean coast loses its meaning.

Over the past few years, cases of NATO ships approaching the Black Sea borders of the Russian Federation have become more frequent. This is happening under the pretext of the struggle of the North Atlantic Alliance with the “Russian threat”. In the summer of 2019, a video appeared where NATO calls Russia one of the main threats to the security of the Alliance. They are trying to carry out reconnaissance both from the ships of the Black Sea members of the western military block, and from the ships of the countries that enter the Black Sea, while still observing the Montreux Convention.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. serg.shishkov2015 16 March 2020 10: 46 New
    • 22
    • 5
    +17
    Already my heart rejoices at such news! Somehow it has already become a stereotype that Russia is lagging behind in electronics! But no!
    1. Same lech 16 March 2020 10: 49 New
      • 9
      • 9
      0
      The RIA Novosti was told about this by an interlocutor working in the power structures of the Crimea.

      Yeah, he took and leaked all the secrets of Russian electronic warfare systems to NATO ... kindergarten.
      Feeling the strength of our border is happening every day ... in the air, at sea and on land ... the enemy is looking for our weaknesses.
      1. Hagalaz 16 March 2020 10: 58 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Well, okay, what’s the secret here, if the enemy is already feeling resistance. The main thing here is that no one would merge different technical parameters, frequencies, algorithms and so on there (I'm not really in the topic like that). And it’s also important that they didn’t stop there, otherwise, from that side, they are not fools either. In order to feel that used to find a way to break through.
      2. ApJlekuHo 17 March 2020 12: 20 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        the enemy is looking for our weak points.

        What enemy are you talking about?
    2. svp67 16 March 2020 11: 04 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Quote: serg.shishkov2015
      Already my heart rejoices at such news! Somehow it has already become a stereotype that Russia is lagging behind in electronics! But no!

      Here it is no longer in "electronics", but in the ability to use what we have. And our scientists were able to do this back in Soviet times. Creating masterpieces
      Over the past few years, cases of NATO ships approaching the Black Sea borders of the Russian Federation have become more frequent.
      And not only ships, US UAVs sometimes fly to the Crimea every week, and sometimes several times ...



      1. Same lech 16 March 2020 11: 09 New
        • 36
        • 4
        +32
        US UAVs sometimes fly to Crimea every week, and sometimes several times ...

        Crimea is the southern flank of Russia, and if Putin didn’t knock out this bridgehead from under NATO’s nose in time, we would be ill ... here I am 100% in agreement with Putin.
        1. svp67 16 March 2020 11: 10 New
          • 9
          • 0
          +9
          Quote: The same Lech
          Crimea is the southern flank of Russia, and if Putin didn’t knock out this bridgehead from under NATO’s nose in time, we would be ill ... here I am 100% in agreement with Putin.

          I agree ...
        2. tihonmarine 16 March 2020 11: 45 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          Quote: The same Lech
          US UAVs sometimes fly to Crimea every week, and sometimes several times ...

          Crimea is the southern flank of Russia, and if Putin didn’t knock out this bridgehead from under NATO’s nose in time, we would be ill ... here I am 100% in agreement with Putin.

          There should be no doubt.
        3. Vladimir61 16 March 2020 12: 02 New
          • 12
          • 4
          +8
          Quote: The same Lech
          Crimea is the southern flank of Russia, and if Putin didn’t knock this bridgehead out of NATO’s nose in time, we would be in a bad mood ...

          It is a pity that they did not “knock out” at that time the entire New Russia of the Russian Empire, from Odessa to Kharkov.
      2. mikh-korsakov 16 March 2020 11: 23 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Sergei! I agree with that. The interference theory, on which the jamming algorithms are based on modern electronic warfare techniques, was developed in the USSR - at MPEI under the supervision of Academician Kotelnikov and in Leningrad, at the LPI at the faculty of EED. Currently, the technique is such that, if desired, you can either drown or land the UAV. But why run up - they are simply blinded.
        1. Vladimir_6 16 March 2020 13: 19 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: mikh-korsakov
          Currently, the technique is such that, if desired, you can either drown or land the UAV.

          And not just UAVs. I remember in Norway in November 2018, Russia was accused of signal distortion
          GPS when the frigate Helge Ingstad with a tanker sank.
      3. orionvitt 16 March 2020 16: 50 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: svp67
        Here it is no longer in "electronics", but in the ability to use what we have.

        It is in electronics. I’m tired of explaining that electronics is far from being only fashionable smartphones and gaming video cards. What is most confident of the majority of young (and not only) "experts".
    3. antchar 16 March 2020 12: 14 New
      • 11
      • 1
      +10
      Electronics and electronic base are two different things. It is possible to make a device on lamps that nanotechnology is not available. For example, radiation resistance.

      ,
      1. mikh-korsakov 16 March 2020 14: 23 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Anatoly! There is such a thing. Once I foolishly placed a device containing semiconductor devices in a "hot chamber", as it seemed to me, to make the whole system more compact and reduce gas communications. The result was deplorable. I had to call from the company - to repair. But the pre-historic re-calculation of B-2 on lamps, which was created back in the days of Kurchatov, could be poked anywhere
      2. svp67 16 March 2020 17: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: antchar
        It is possible to make a device on lamps that nanotechnology is not available.

        But these devices will be more bulky and heavy, and then do not be surprised that we still do not have modern mass shock UAVs with a long range
        1. Crimean partisan 1974 16 March 2020 19: 18 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          But only these devices will be more bulky and heavy ... along the way the ancient SPN-30 (popularly nicknamed Cheburashka) is still a relevant topic, and evil tongues say that Kolchuga made a lot of noise in the west. the same along the tube
          1. NordUral 16 March 2020 23: 48 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            On land, and the sea will fit.
    4. Imperial Technocrat 16 March 2020 15: 17 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      EW is the best in the world. And much more
  2. Kochegarkin 16 March 2020 10: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    and NATO in fact threw a claim?
    1. Same lech 16 March 2020 10: 57 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      and NATO in fact threw a claim?

      It’s all within the framework of international law ... what claims can be here ... what is your evidence.
    2. Major Yurik 16 March 2020 11: 08 New
      • 27
      • 1
      +26
      Quote: The Stoker
      and NATO in fact threw a claim?

      No need to climb in dirty galoshes wherever you hit! negative Especially if you were not called there, because ...
      .
    3. YOUR 16 March 2020 11: 13 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Thank you.
      They made a laugh.
      He presented a note to the State Department, turn off your electronic warfare funds, and interfere with intelligence.
    4. tihonmarine 16 March 2020 11: 47 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: The Stoker
      and NATO in fact threw a claim?

      They should be satisfied that at least they do not knock down, but only blind.
    5. Vladimir_6 16 March 2020 13: 26 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: The Stoker
      and NATO in fact threw a claim?

      "Since 2016, Russia has used the technology of disorienting satellite navigation off the coast of the occupied Crimea for about ten thousand times. Intentional distortion of GPS signals has also been recorded in the Mediterranean Sea, the Gulf of Finland, in the port of Vladivostok. Evidence is in the report of the American non-governmental analytical organization C4ADS."
      More details here: http://seafarers.com.ua/russian-gps-spoofing/16149/
  3. rocket757 16 March 2020 10: 52 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    The power structures called the main obstacle to the reconnaissance of NATO ships off the Crimean coast

    They were not called here ... everything, there’s nothing more to talk about.
    1. Same lech 16 March 2020 10: 59 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      They were not called here

      Naturally ... like Hitler ... like Napoleon ... everything is old like an apple of discord from the time of Noah ... they themselves will come to us ... once every 100 years they need to be vaccinated against the invasion of Russia.
      1. rocket757 16 March 2020 11: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: The same Lech
        they need to be vaccinated against the invasion of Russia.

        All right, yes it hurt the weapon became destructive ... down to the fatal one! I don’t want to see the final arm
      2. Kerensky 16 March 2020 12: 09 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        everything is old like an apple of discord since the days of Noah.

        good
        Correctly! Let analysts break their heads!
    2. cniza 16 March 2020 11: 04 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      And they don’t have any interests in Crimea, he all “sailed away” ...
      1. rocket757 16 March 2020 11: 31 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Therefore, they now have an interest, because Crimea sailed to US, and not to where they wanted to see it.
        1. cniza 16 March 2020 11: 47 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Now let the back of your head scratch and look for your interest elsewhere ...
          1. rocket757 16 March 2020 11: 57 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Yes, but it’s painfully dull and cunning! Behind them you need an eye, but an eye ... or better, the entire arsenal of intelligence, control means.
            1. cniza 16 March 2020 12: 10 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Yeah, and "noise" in the ears for the rest of my life ...
              1. rocket757 16 March 2020 12: 11 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Put a couple of firecrackers where you need and burn! However, for another pair there will be application.
          2. Terenin 16 March 2020 12: 01 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Quote: cniza
            Now let the back of your head scratch and look for your interest elsewhere ...

            That's it, nefig to roam under the windows of others and bathe putty ... am
            1. cniza 16 March 2020 12: 12 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              Drive them with a filthy broom and turn off the louder ...
              1. Crimean partisan 1974 16 March 2020 19: 26 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                and turn on the “boogie” louder ...... The cord and louder, in decibels so 160
    3. YOUR 16 March 2020 11: 15 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      In principle, everyday work, they feel weak for us, we respond in the same way.
      For not fig. We also want to know what is there and where they have it, but how it works. Useful.
      1. rocket757 16 March 2020 11: 33 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: YOUR
        In principle, ordinary work,

        This is true, for intelligence, at least some, at least whose, such a job! Smell everything, find out!
        1. cniza 16 March 2020 11: 51 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          And at the counterintelligence, this scent to break off and "tuck the horns in the ears" ...
          1. rocket757 16 March 2020 11: 59 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            This is natural. To advance their intelligence tools closer to them .... and tsuzu to fix obstacles, up to ....
    4. tihonmarine 16 March 2020 11: 50 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: rocket757
      They were not called here ... everything, there’s nothing more to talk about.

      You can imagine how much screeching there would be if a Russian UAV hung in the area of ​​the Norfolk Naval Naval Base.
      1. rocket757 16 March 2020 12: 01 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        There would be a screech, it’s understandable ... but I’d still have fun in the capture / interception ....
  4. Mouse 16 March 2020 11: 03 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Their crews get the wrong coordinates and lose their orientation

    Disoriented and demoralized ... the main thing is that they would not have stuck in some lighthouse .... laughing
    1. Same lech 16 March 2020 11: 13 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Disoriented and demoralized ... the main thing is that they would not have stuck in some lighthouse ....

      Yes, there is such a risk ... so many ships at the bottom of the Black Sea, mother do not cry.
      1. serg.shishkov2015 16 March 2020 11: 17 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And not only ships, but also mines!
      2. tihonmarine 16 March 2020 11: 54 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: The same Lech
        Yes, there is such a risk ... so many ships at the bottom of the Black Sea, mother do not cry.

        Let them get used to it, "As a person gets used to everything, Mu-mu got used to urban life."
  5. Shuttle 16 March 2020 11: 11 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    electronic warfare makes NATO reconnaissance equipment useless. In addition, they bring down the navigational settings of foreign warships approaching the sea borders of the Russian Federation. Their crews get the wrong coordinates and lose their orientation. Thus, reconnaissance from the sea of ​​the Crimean coast loses its meaning.

    What will happen when all of a sudden the opponents massively start smokering each other along orbital groups? The American group is the largest. For this reason, and the most vulnerable to exposure.
  6. Avior 16 March 2020 11: 18 New
    • 4
    • 5
    -1
    Here are the questions.
    I would like to understand how EW can impede the operation of passive RTR means, or at least to guess the fact of their work?
    1. Galleon 16 March 2020 11: 32 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      Well, why are you like this? Breaking high on fellow citizens. fellow
      Of course, we are talking about barriers in frequency interference. When a scout flies, the electronic warfare interferes so that our radio-electronic equipment can no longer work. Therefore, RTR does not detect anything but interference. laughing
      1. Avior 16 March 2020 11: 41 New
        • 4
        • 5
        -1
        I honestly waited while I enjoyed smile
        1. Galleon 16 March 2020 11: 44 New
          • 3
          • 5
          -2
          Quote: Avior
          I honestly waited while I enjoyed smile

          laughing good Well then you have one more +
    2. rudolff 16 March 2020 11: 40 New
      • 8
      • 5
      +3
      Yeah, drown out the natural frequencies of the radio so that the adversary would not hear anything! The article is delusional from beginning to end.
      1. Avior 16 March 2020 11: 42 New
        • 2
        • 6
        -4
        moreover, all communication frequencies, who knows which particular adversary is currently listening smile
    3. ccsr 16 March 2020 13: 19 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Avior
      I would like to understand how EW can impede the operation of passive RTR means, or at least to guess the fact of their work?

      You noticed everything correctly, because the article was apparently written by an illiterate author who does not understand that if our electronic warfare systems begin to work actively, they will primarily suppress our communication and control systems in the first place, which is why the use of electronic warfare in peacetime is extremely limited.
      And in wartime they think first of all what effect will be from the use of electronic warfare, if our networks work in the same band with enemy networks.
      Using reconnaissance ships in the Black Sea is now simply ruinous for Americans, because a large number of American bases around our country (Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Greece) and UAVs allow them to take from a stationary position almost everything that interests them in the field of electronic intelligence. And given optoelectronic systems for UAVs, it can be predicted that they will receive more information in one daily flight than a reconnaissance ship in that same time.
  7. rudolff 16 March 2020 11: 37 New
    • 7
    • 5
    +2
    "In addition, they knock down the navigational settings of foreign warships approaching the sea borders of the Russian Federation. Their crews get the wrong coordinates and lose their orientation."
    Lord, what nonsense!
    1. seagull 16 March 2020 12: 04 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      "While the enemy is drawing offensive maps, we are changing landscapes, moreover, manually. When the time comes for an attack, the enemy is lost in an unfamiliar area and comes into complete sky readiness." (with)
  8. Incvizitor 16 March 2020 12: 11 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    They would finish the delivery vehicles and test it.
    "Alabuga." This is a missile whose warhead is a high-frequency generator of high-power electromagnetic field.
    According to active pulsed radiation, a kind of nuclear explosion is obtained, only without a radioactive component. Field tests showed the high efficiency of the unit - not only electronic, but also conventional electronic equipment of wired architecture, fails within a radius of 3,5 km. Those. not only removes the main communication headsets from normal operation, blinding and stunning the enemy, but actually leaves the whole unit without any local electronic control systems, including weapons.
    The advantages of such a “non-lethal” defeat are obvious - the enemy will only have to surrender, and the equipment can be obtained as a trophy.
  9. askort154 16 March 2020 12: 30 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    The power structures called the main obstacle to the reconnaissance of NATO ships off the Crimean coast

    Now "all-props" and representatives of the "promised land" will come up, with their "undeniable calculations."
    And in response, I will lay out to them, only not classified in Russia, but available to the media, information.
    - ZGRLS "Container", 4 pcs. located in Mordovia, Kalmykia, Amur region, in the Far East (in Zeya, which together) covers the whole of Europe, Central Asia, China, Japan, both Korea and the Middle East.
    - EW funds - Borisoglebsk, Judoka, R-378, Leer
    Collectively, they suppress communication lines, including “cellular”, GSM standards, and GPS navigation. As a result, they block the electronic information management of the enemy, as well as organize the distribution of "necessary SMS" to the "enemy" phones, for misinformation. (in practice, it was applied in the Crimea, when all
    APU garrisons found themselves without communication with the General Staff in Kiev). Even the CIA for 3 days did not have information about the "events in Sevastopol."
    - "Sickle" - directed email. a magnetic beam that stops the exchange of signals between the UAV and the operator. At frequencies: GPS, Wi-Fi, GSM and even GLONAS. Disabled UAV navigation equipment within a radius of 20 km. First presented at the forum - “Army 2018” (which means it’s already declassified).
    And in order to not be an unsubstantiated propagandist of the patriotism of my Motherland, in the eyes of the "all-fussers", I quote them the statement of the current head of command
    special operations of the US Armed Forces, General Raymond Thomas:
    “At present, in Syria, we are in the most aggressive electronic warfare environment on the part of our opponents. They test us for strength daily, suppress our communications and disable them, even our EU -130. (the most advanced electronic warfare aircraft in the Air Force USA).
    And you think that just so the United States is not eager to openly intercede for Erdogan, especially for the "Pole-Baltic - Ukrainian schizos." The United States realized that it was missing the restoration of Russia's modern defenses. In an open "battle" it is too tough for them.
    Now they will act in the old way - trying to ruin Russia inside (like the USSR). And in this soil, there is still much left - "humus". The second option is to drive a wedge between Russia and China. In this they are great masters, with centuries of practice. And to be Russia, or not to be, always depended on the firmness of the Russian spirit, its moral morality, regardless of material capabilities.
    What they are now trying to weather, by all means, both from the outside, and using the internal "humus". (Sorry, it turned out a lot of letters, but this is the very minimum yes )
  10. Ros 56 16 March 2020 12: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And it would be nice to take our EWs into the sea on some sort of ships, so as not to torment the NATO troops by approaching our borders.
  11. Livonetc 16 March 2020 12: 51 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    It’s good when you can measure systems without human loss.
    ““ Actually, I'm very brave, ”said Trulyalya, lowering his voice.“ Only today my head hurts! ”
    But Thrall heard him.
    - And my tooth hurts! He cried. “It hurts me more than you!”
    “Then do not fight today,” Alice rejoiced. She so wanted to reconcile them.
    “We still have to fight a little,” said Trulyalya. “But I do not insist on a long fight.” What time is it now?
    Tralia looked at his watch and said:
    - Half past five.
    “We will fight until six o’clock, and then we will have lunch,” suggested Trulyalya,
    “Well,” answered Thrall with a sigh, “decided.” And let her look!
    And turning to Alice, he added:
    “Don't come very close!” When I get out, I crush everything that falls into my arm!
    - And I crush everything that falls under my foot! Cried Trulyalya.
    Alice laughed.
    - That's right, the trees are getting from you! - she said.
    Trulyalya looked around with a pleased smile.
    “By the time the fight is over,” he said, “not a single tree will be left around!” Not one in the whole forest!
    “And all because of the rattle!” She said, still hoping they would be a little ashamed.
    “I would not say a word to him,” answered Trulyalya. “But she was brand new!”
  12. Old Michael 16 March 2020 22: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    penetrate digital and communication networks

    Clearly, this is a quote. Quotation from the speech of an unnamed interlocutor whose thought the author of the news either did not hear or misunderstood.
    Perhaps it depends on what he thought - head or brain.