In the USA: “F-22 maneuvering slow-motion video is literally mesmerizing”

In the USA: “F-22 maneuvering slow-motion video is literally mesmerizing”

In the Western media, the operator’s work is being discussed, which represents the performance of aerobatics by a pilot of the fifth-generation American fighter F-22. In The Drive, columnist Tyler Rogway writes:


The high frame rate of the video and the incredibly stable tracking allow us to see all the smallest details of these maneuvers.

The author calls the American F-22 the main aircraft in terms of "complete air superiority." It is noted that the Russian Su-35 is superior to the F-22 in terms of super-maneuverability, but "in general, the Raptor will surpass it in the air confrontation." It is stated that over-maneuverability today cannot be considered as a separate taken advantage of a fighter.

From the material:

This slow-motion video with the maneuvering of the F-22 is literally mesmerizing.

In social networks, where the video was published with the F-22 piloting, users write that the aircraft "is highly dependent on software during the flight."

One of the comments:

All pilots claim that they experience joy during the flight.


Recall that at the moment in the United States they prefer the fifth-generation fighter F-35. At the same time, the States do not export F-22 fighters, leaving them exclusively on their own weapons.

Combat Learjet Video:

Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Honest Citizen 16 March 2020 08: 00 New
    • 24
    • 11
    +13
    It is noted that the Russian Su-35 is superior to the F-22 in terms of super-maneuverability, but "in general, the Raptor will surpass it in the air confrontation."

    Hmm ... flight of thought ... Dali smokes nervously aside.
    The author of such a phrase is immediately awarded the Nobel Prize in literature ...
    1. Cowbra 16 March 2020 08: 33 New
      • 25
      • 8
      +17
      The funny thing is not even that. Admire precisely maneuverability. And then - but it is not important! The truth is only when it comes to Su-shka laughing I think the sectarians will like it. They love to repeat different nonsense
      1. For example 16 March 2020 10: 08 New
        • 37
        • 5
        +32
        And at what second "F-22 is literally mesmerizing"? request

        I did not notice anything new in maneuvering this aircraft.

        Not yesterday, a barrel and loop of Nesterov appeared.
        Is that a vertical lift. Only 4-generation aircraft and this "trick" make it easy.

        And (forgive me supporters of artificial intelligence) without the help of software code, pilots fly like this.
        1. Paul Siebert 16 March 2020 14: 37 New
          • 19
          • 7
          +12
          Once the whole world was mesmerized by the footage of the presence of mattress astronauts on the moon.
          They gracefully, as if in a rapid jump, raised dustbones, ridiculously swayed.
          "This is what it means on the moon there is no atmosphere and gravity is six times lower than the earth," exclaimed experts.
          in the nineties they guessed to increase the frame rate by one and a half times.
          It turned out that the astronauts are moving quite earthly. Usually.
          And, most likely, it was shot in the Hollywood pavilion.
          A little later, Stanley Kubrick confirmed this assumption - the film was ordered by NASA. In the year 1969.
          Now is the year 2020. The whole world is fascinated by the slow motion "F-22".
          Enough to be fascinated? How do you get rid of it? laughing
        2. krot 16 March 2020 14: 38 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          The funny thing is not even that. Admire precisely maneuverability. And then - but it is not important!

          I fully agree! The video smiled after reading the title and watching. laughing Interestingly, this "super-maneuverability" of the Raptor is comparable even with the Su-27? Where the nozzles are not even rotary.
        3. Starover_Z 16 March 2020 21: 26 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: For example
          I did not notice anything new in maneuvering this aircraft.

          In general, it resembles a directed shooting. The camera seems to be flying next to the plane during maneuvers, the sharpness is not lost ... Just like on computer frames!
          1. Nosgoth 17 March 2020 05: 24 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            This is just tracking, plus cropping. To ensure that the object is always in the center, they are shot at a higher resolution (in order to have a reserve on the sides of the object), and then inside the resulting frame, a smaller frame is made that is tied to the center of the object. In real life (in full frame), an object can jump from edge to edge of a frame, but after cropping it is always always centered. Those. They can shoot in both 4K and 8K, but the output material will be 1K - FullHD, or even lower quality due to cropping the frame.
            1. Tatar 174 17 March 2020 17: 55 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Immediately struck by the phrase that "All pilots claim that they feel joy during the flight" And if this software crashes during the flight ??? What then??? Probably a fluffy northern animal will overtake him ... And ours will be able to fly into the air an old non-digital plane and !!! And put on the rails a completely non-digital iron engine and !!! Get in the T-34 and !!! You can continue ... Along with digital technology, it is necessary to keep dry and completely non-digital weapons.
    2. Thrall 16 March 2020 08: 34 New
      • 23
      • 1
      +22
      Quote: Honest Citizen
      but "generally Raptor will surpass him in air confrontation "

      Anecdote on this topic: smile
      The elder built a soldier to distribute a monetary allowance.
      - Ivanov!
      - I!
      - 1200 rubles, get it, sign it.
      - Petrov!
      - I!
      - 1200 rubles, get it, sign it.
      ......
      - total! .... total! Missing again? Here is a fool,
      gets the most!
      1. Ross xnumx 16 March 2020 09: 27 New
        • 24
        • 2
        +22
        Recall that at the moment in The United States prefers fifth-generation fighter F-35.

        They were simply not allowed to see:

        Quote: Michael Drabkin
        The work of the tail unit is visible ...

        When I beat a fly, I can also clearly see how it "bores" with its front paws ...
        1. 123456789 16 March 2020 09: 54 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          + ir per video soldier
      2. Insurgent 16 March 2020 09: 28 New
        • 25
        • 5
        +20
        IT'S ALL (???), what "bewitched" them?

        How little, miserable, they need to write in boiling water ...



        1. 123456789 16 March 2020 10: 08 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          + ir per video
          PS If there is one video in each comment, then there would be two + ika laughing
          1. Insurgent 16 March 2020 10: 11 New
            • 5
            • 5
            0
            Quote: 123456789
            PS If there is one video in each comment, then there would be two + ika

            Not for the sake of "iks" we exist.
        2. Grits 16 March 2020 10: 22 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Insurgent
          How little, miserable, they need to write in boiling water ...

          And where is the parachute when landing?
          1. Insurgent 16 March 2020 10: 27 New
            • 5
            • 5
            0
            Quote: Gritsa
            And where is the parachute when landing?

            You’ve put me in a dead end with a question ... I can only, shrug request

            I know the practice with early release of a parachute (video), but landing WITHOUT releasing it recourse .

            1. Grits 16 March 2020 15: 32 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Insurgent
              I can only get my hands apart

              So I didn’t understand anything and spread my hands. We are used to the fact that modern fighter planes, when landing, quench speed with the help of brake parachutes. But here, when watching your video, I caught myself thinking that I did not find this procedure. Is he not always thrown away? And in what cases?
              Maybe professional people from aviation will explain to us?
              1. Nikolay Balashov 17 March 2020 11: 04 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                When the band is large, they may not release a brake parachute. A disclosure before landing - greatly reduces mileage.
        3. fox_rudy 16 March 2020 10: 25 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          So the most interesting thing is that they compare with the SU-35, and not with the 57th !!! There are no options at all !!!
        4. Pavel73 16 March 2020 13: 17 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          It’s not enough to see, you need to hear it: :)
      3. Angelo Provolone 16 March 2020 10: 40 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Total! .... total! Missing again? Here is a fool,
        gets the most!


        Yes, no ... This is our foreman at a construction site, when he gave grandmothers hands according to a report card, everyone called themselves "Total."
    3. Finches 16 March 2020 13: 25 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      I would note the work of the pilot ... Obviously he has Russian roots!
  2. Mikhail Drabkin 16 March 2020 08: 02 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    The work of the tail unit is visible ...
    Good video!!!
  3. Vasyan1971 16 March 2020 08: 03 New
    • 20
    • 1
    +19
    I can’t say anything about the pilot’s skills and his joy, but the operator’s job of holding onto the target is impeccable.
    1. Ren
      Ren 16 March 2020 08: 07 New
      • 22
      • 1
      +21
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      I can’t say anything about the pilot’s skills and his joy, but the operator’s job of holding onto the target is impeccable.

      God himself commanded this MANPADS operator to his hands, it holds the target well. wassat
    2. Antidote 16 March 2020 08: 22 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      YouTube can stabilize the video, and even special editors and even more so. This is a 100% non-raw camera video.
      1. Vasyan1971 16 March 2020 10: 08 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Antidote
        This is a 100% non-raw camera video.

        Anyway - impressive (in the sense of work). The Americans are recognized showmen, why, there ...
    3. Insurgent 16 March 2020 10: 14 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      the operator’s job of holding the target is impeccable

      With modern, combined stabilization systems in the cameras, and do not hold back?
      This, sorry, you need to be crooked.
      1. Vasyan1971 16 March 2020 10: 22 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        Quote: Insurgent
        This, sorry, you need to be crooked.

        Maybe. But u-tube is full of such "crooked-handed". By the way, you yourself are from which? Of those who are talking about someone else's work, no matter what it is done, you can only say: "You can imagine ..."? What is the conversation about?
  4. Ham
    Ham 16 March 2020 08: 04 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    the main advertisement ... and even advertising in the usa can shoot
    1. Insurgent 16 March 2020 12: 15 New
      • 2
      • 6
      -4
      Quote: Ham
      the main advertisement ... and even advertising in the usa can shoot

      Are able yes
      Accident "XB-70 Valkyrie". It occurred during the filming of a commercial, as a result of a collision with the fighter "F-4 Phantom II".
      After the disaster, work on the XB-70 Valkyrie project was no longer resumed.

  5. Mwg
    Mwg 16 March 2020 08: 06 New
    • 6
    • 6
    0
    This became interesting: the high stabilization of the shooting, the absence of glare, the location of the subject in the center of the frame. This is how so managed to remove? Is it not computer graphics? is very similar
    1. Voyager 16 March 2020 08: 20 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Here the secret is not in shooting, but in editing. The material was cut off at the edges and the object (plane) was enlarged, fixing it in the center of the frame. Attentive may notice that the image periodically "vibrates" in waves - this is a consequence of software stabilization during installation. The algorithm tries to shake the picture to compensate for the jitter of the object in the frame.
    2. Hagalaz 16 March 2020 08: 22 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes, no, not like the schedule, real. But here thoughts about some kind of system for holding the object in the frame, suggest themselves. I think technically it is possible.
      1. bessmertniy 16 March 2020 09: 16 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Probably the retention of the frame occurred on the principle of "retention of the target." what
        1. Hagalaz 16 March 2020 09: 37 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Maybe. Also thought about it.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Avior 16 March 2020 08: 08 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    The rudders are clearly visible
    Really mesmerizing
    It would be nice if such a slow motion video was on other planes.
  8. svp67 16 March 2020 08: 08 New
    • 12
    • 1
    +11
    The Raptor is a pretty good aerobatic airplane, but how does its nozzle “glow” when performing aerobatics ... but what about this stealth with its thermal signature?

    In general, the Su-35 aerobatics then more energetic then passes
    1. alid 16 March 2020 08: 20 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      something like this.
    2. Avior 16 March 2020 08: 24 New
      • 9
      • 1
      +8
      I came across a video that shot different planes at performances at the air show using a thermal imager
    3. NIKN 16 March 2020 09: 19 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      but here’s how his nozzles “glow” when performing aerobatics ... but how is it with this “stealth” with thermal visibility?

      Glow on afterburner. Therefore, the fifth generation aircraft requirements for afterburning "cruising" supersonic.
    4. Ax Matt 16 March 2020 10: 45 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And they "glow" because of not optimal burning of fuel, read the torchlight. The burning temperature of the mixture is low, compared with our ... little white good
      1. svp67 16 March 2020 11: 16 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Ax Matt
        The burning temperature of the mixture is low, compared with our ... little white

        That is, their temperature signature is also reduced due to this?
  9. novel66 16 March 2020 08: 16 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    what is aerobatics? nothing . what Kozhedub could not do on his La-7 ... like ... years have passed?
    1. svp67 16 March 2020 13: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: novel xnumx
      nothing . what Kozhedub could not do on his La-7 ..

      Could ... but not at such speeds and not so vigorously.
  10. Fedorov 16 March 2020 08: 18 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    The video is normal, advanced aircraft. And the fact that it is not released and in the maintenance of super expensive, no one said. They practically do not pull service. He appeared in Syria until the Su-35 fell on its tail, and everything disappeared from sight.
  11. Whirlwind 16 March 2020 08: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The raven will not peck out the crow ...
  12. rocket757 16 March 2020 08: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Everything is fine. The product must be shown face .... or tail. Advertising is however the engine of commerce ... although sanctions, the action is more effective.
  13. orionvitt 16 March 2020 08: 25 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Well, made a "loop", what's the catch? In camera work?
  14. Papapg 16 March 2020 08: 28 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    Take a closer look, this is a cartoon, but even such a cartoon does not make much impression, for the money that he pays for it, he must show something else.
  15. Skarpzd 16 March 2020 08: 31 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Quote: novel xnumx
    what is aerobatics? nothing . what Kozhedub could not do on his La-7 ... like ... years have passed?

    moreover ... I personally did something similar when, when descending from a hill near a bicycle, the front axle burst (((
  16. EvilLion 16 March 2020 08: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    2 Engines are 2 engines, you can have good traction if the engines are good, and the Americans have never complained about it.
  17. Eug
    Eug 16 March 2020 08: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And what, someone considers separately super-maneuverability? Only in combination with all the characteristics, as I understand it, no one is going to downplay their significance. Without fetish individual. And aerobatics - was a little surprised when I saw a video in which Su Russian Knights landed on a course in the horizon after takeoff and climb, and this was commented off-screen as an achievement. I saw this in the performance of the Pilot on the MiG-21 with the 13th engine back in 1986. A normal pilot will always take a little more from the plane than is recorded in the LTH - and without negative consequences ....
    1. Eug
      Eug 22 March 2020 06: 20 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Wrong, the Su-35 is not Russian Knights, but the Sokolov of Russia.
  18. Svetlana 16 March 2020 08: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    >>>> The Western media are discussing camera work, which .... <<

    Operator - A man of art and yes, he can create a very beautiful video. American cinema is not the worst.
    We rushed to discuss the planes. ))))
  19. viktor_ui 16 March 2020 08: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I liked how the optics drive the F-22, I would like to see the recording in higher resolution. Definitely a beautiful video, albeit a short one.
  20. Bshkaus 16 March 2020 09: 11 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    It is noted that the Russian Su-35 is superior to the F-22 in terms of super-maneuverability, but "in general, the Raptor will surpass it in the air confrontation." It is stated that over-maneuverability today cannot be considered as a separate taken advantage of a fighter.

    The human factor, the human factor, and again the human factor.
    If the F22 pilot manages to prevent Su-35 from approaching close range, then he really has a very high chance of realizing his strengths and shooting the Su-35 as in a shooting gallery.
    If the pilot of the Su-35, due to his personal qualities, can jump out at close range, then the F-22 pilot will twitch like a crucian in a frying pan, having fully experienced the full potential of super maneuverability.
    The paramount task is to search for effective tactics of imposing a battle on their own terms, with emphasis on the strengths of their vehicles, whoever develops it first, and beyond that, the sky.
    1. Krasnoyarsk 16 March 2020 09: 44 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Bshkaus

      The paramount task is to search for effective tactics of imposing a battle on their own terms, with emphasis on the strengths of their vehicles, whoever develops it first, and beyond that, the sky.

      No, the primary task is to develop a more "long-range" radar and a more long-range and accurate missile than the adversary.
      1. Bshkaus 16 March 2020 10: 34 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        the primary task is the development of a more "long-range" radar and a more long-range and accurate missile than that of the adversary.

        I agree, but partially: the development of radar and long-range missiles is a good and necessary thing, but the implementation of these projects requires more than one year, and this had to be done not yesterday, or even ten years ago !!!
        The requirements and properties of the fifth generation aircraft were known from open sources in the mid 90s. I was 12, I already had glued plastic models including F22 and even then, arranging toy air battles in my hands, F 22 arranged an "author" aerobatics "pancake" when the plane rotated around its axis without changing its direction of movement.
        Yes, even a snotty schoolboy like me was already aware of stealth technology and great potential, which opens the principle of changing the thrust vector. And I sincerely cried with happiness, when 20 years later on TV they showed a T-50 spinning like a top
        So 25 years have already blinked ((((
        But the meetings of the F-22 and Su-35 can be here and now, and we must not act on the principle of "it is good to", a "what to do in specific conditions based on what we have in fact"
        When the engine of the "second stage" appears, when the PAR and many other things that are lacking now appear - then we must reconsider approaches to conducting air combat.
  21. Zaurbek 16 March 2020 09: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And does the Su35C depend weakly on software during the flight?
  22. Jurkovs 16 March 2020 09: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And if you shoot even slower? Then voooooobschee!
  23. Andrey VOV 16 March 2020 09: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Beautiful, like any aerobatics, no more
  24. bratchanin3 16 March 2020 10: 06 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Something did not fascinate me at all - I did not see a flat corkscrew with a 360-degree turn, nor a Pugachev loop and, in general, nothing interesting and worthwhile! Maybe because for me the Americans mean nothing, not the slightest authority ?! Quite the opposite!
  25. Ax Matt 16 March 2020 10: 31 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Uh ... Maybe I misunderstood something. And where is the “bewitching” flight here ...? With a black sheep, even a tuft of wool ...
  26. Angelo Provolone 16 March 2020 10: 50 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    What is fascinating is the hunting of a bird of prey. I have something like an owl flying overhead, so I almost o-xa.
    1. Wolf 16 March 2020 11: 47 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      For these videos, I would put you 10 +, but impossible. COMMONWEALTH
      1. Wolf 16 March 2020 11: 49 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Radar excellent, missile misses, stealth flawless.
    2. Tuzik 16 March 2020 16: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Thanks, cool video! Cruel birds.
    3. Aag
      Aag 16 March 2020 20: 43 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The work of "theirs" operators has always been amazing! ... Not a specialist, practically, in anything, -But appreciate the "mechanization" of the wing, optics, and even EW (as an asp snake-eater spread its wings ....). science, then very promising, as it was combined, -BIONICA! Maybe someone will clarify the current situation. Or again: man is the Tsar, the crown of Nature?
  27. Ros 56 16 March 2020 11: 50 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well and what supernatural did he show? This flier would be put in a row with Kopanina and for aerobatics, his head would fall off.
  28. Lord of the Sith 16 March 2020 12: 34 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Something is not at all impressive, unlike our "Sushki"))
  29. Mitroha 16 March 2020 13: 56 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Honest Citizen
    Nobel Prize in Literature ...
    Reply

    Only Shnobelevskaya
  30. g1washntwn 16 March 2020 14: 05 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Slow-mo was invented to make the movie accessible to everyone. In principle, shooting in HD of a crawling snail also fascinates an ordinary person ... But for the "unusual" it looks like a bluer in the Fast and the Furious. smile
  31. Rostislav Prokopenko 16 March 2020 14: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    If he flew in real mode, then yes. And so ... If you shoot the control system in slow motion, then this can generally be a freeze frame :-)
    They can make movies wink
  32. Strag 16 March 2020 15: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    and what is over maneuverability? at what speed and altitude this is done a super aerobatics figure which not every aircraft can afford is a dead loop))
  33. Kizey 16 March 2020 15: 46 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    why did he do such an unreal thing?
    1. bar
      bar 17 March 2020 10: 18 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      why did he do such an unreal thing?

      Like what? He even flies !!!
  34. IC
    IC 16 March 2020 15: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    As far as I understand from the information of experts, the new American
    fighters are not intended for close combat. Their task is to detect the enemy at a long distance and hit him with a long-range missile.
    1. Tuzik 16 March 2020 16: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And if it doesn’t work out, he can calmly conduct a maneuvering battle. Not for nothing that he has a thrust vector. In addition to the family of the 27th, there is still a whole bunch of other aircraft. It is unlikely that the same Typhoon will twist him.
    2. Wolf 16 March 2020 19: 07 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It’s just a “small problem” over the long haul to hit overhand aircraft almost not possible
  35. Grandfather Crimea 17 March 2020 09: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yeah, wretched cheer up)))))
  36. bar
    bar 17 March 2020 10: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    You won’t praise yourself - you walk like a spat. laughing
  37. Wolf 17 March 2020 12: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Appointment of such videos scare potential enemies! but actually it is HOLYWOOD. At long range F22 can do almost nothing, for example, neither the SU 30, SU35, MIG 35, they are avoiding long-range missiles. The question is whether F22 has time to escape when the first missile is launched? At close range, all these aircraft can hit the F22, it all depends on the skill of the pilots!
  38. vladimych 17 March 2020 17: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Shooting is not ice. There is no prospect.
  39. Dzafdet 17 March 2020 17: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Paul Siebert
    Once the whole world was mesmerized by the footage of the presence of mattress astronauts on the moon.
    They gracefully, as if in a rapid jump, raised dustbones, ridiculously swayed.
    "This is what it means on the moon there is no atmosphere and gravity is six times lower than the earth," exclaimed experts.
    in the nineties they guessed to increase the frame rate by one and a half times.
    It turned out that the astronauts are moving quite earthly. Usually.
    And, most likely, it was shot in the Hollywood pavilion.
    A little later, Stanley Kubrick confirmed this assumption - the film was ordered by NASA. In the year 1969.
    Now is the year 2020. The whole world is fascinated by the slow motion "F-22".
    Enough to be fascinated? How do you get rid of it? laughing


    The next time they arrived on the moon, they were caught by aliens and abused them. After that, NASA curtailed its flight program ...
  40. Prisoner 17 March 2020 20: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Such excuses can be continued, for example, “super-armed today cannot be considered as a single taken advantage of a fighter,” “superlocators cannot be considered as a single taken advantage of a fighter,” “super-speed today cannot be considered as a separate taken advantage of a fighter,” “an excess of high ceiling today cannot be considered as a separate taken advantage of a fighter ", etc. winked
  41. Aviationism 18 March 2020 08: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    All of them are heavy, easily lose speed and slowly accelerate. When the Su-57 receives its product 30 engine, it will be one vote above this group. MiG-35, the easiest, the video looks worse than anyone. Why? Because it is shown without a bow thrust vector (OBT).

    The MiG-35 with OVT and new engines will be the most maneuverable fighter in the history of world aviation. It is not for nothing that here in the West they were glad that Russia did not have money to release MiGs with ATS even for demonstration flights.

    This is bullshit; but why does Russia shoot itself in the foot by offering on the market one good, but ordinary plane instead of the best in the world?

    Judge for yourself:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BdVJPZAKAQE
  42. Axelb 18 March 2020 09: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    With a controlled traction vector, even a brick can turn almost in place. Moreover, when climbing with a candle, the Raptor reduced its speed to a minimum, after which a very small impulse is needed to overturn with a deviation of the engines. Then the plane leaves with a candle down and hysterically tries to maintain this position (it can be seen from the tail unit), because otherwise it will not pick up speed for horizontal flight, but it will gain it due to ... a fall. In fact, this is not a maneuver, but simply threw a stone and it falls down.

    In general, this is such an overconditional maneuverability, which is ridiculous. And the main thing is so rare that they immediately trumpeted it.
    I saw his maneuvers earlier and, in short: Iron with UVT.
    At the same time, Su35 is a leaf in the wind. He does wonders at the same time he does not need to "grind" with a stone down, he holds on and is constantly controlled. Su57, I saw much less, but what I saw all the same at times steeper than F22.

    This is what concerns over-maneuverability; in other parameters, you can only know_ what to give an answer.
    1. Aviationism 19 March 2020 08: 11 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      22, 35 and 57 are big and heavy. Inertia is high. At an air show, low inertia due to negligible fuel and armament and traction armament is higher than 1: 1.

      MiG-35 with ATS is lighter than all of them; less of them and less inert. He is more agile in every way. So far, he is the only one that can perform double-sided somersault, moreover, without significant loss of height.

      MiG-35OVT will fly circles around any Su.

      Here it is he leaf in the wind!

      PS. I do not understand why the Russians do not like the MiG-29/35. You are hypnotized in Drying. Dryers are excellent interceptors, but the outside world bought more MiG-29s than Su-27s. Why did Russia give Sukhoi an absolute monopoly over a controlled thrust vector?
      1. Axelb April 25 2020 23: 49 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        1. This "F" was also counted at an air show.
        2. That's exactly what they bought more MiG29, but this plane has no victories, not at all (I mean even with an enemy comparable in terms of performance characteristics). While a single Su27 in an unfavorable position pulled a couple of 29x moments.
        29 / 35е lighter and have a very high thrust-to-weight ratio
        3. Let MiG and a leaf in the wind, but Su35 that leaf in the wind that can give in the teeth, and not just soar.