Military Review

The US Navy additionally allocated 44 million dollars for the construction of the CVN-79 aircraft carrier "John F. Kennedy"

55

Huntington Ingalls Industries has announced that it has concluded an additional contract with Newport-News Shipbuilding with the US Navy as part of the construction of the nuclear aircraft carrier (AVMA) CVN-79 "John F. Kennedy" class "Gerald R. Ford."


These funds will be used to purchase materials with a long production time. The cost of the agreement is 43,4 million dollars.

AVMA CVN-79 will be the second of three aircraft carriers of the new generation of class "Gerald R. Ford". The new ships will be replaced by the currently operating aircraft carriers of the Enterprise and Nimitz class.

The funds will be used for the purchase of basic equipment, including lifts and pumps.

Currently, Newport News Shipbuilding is working on CVN-79 in accordance with a preliminary contract that provides for the development of the project, planning, purchasing materials with a long production time and the initial production of components.

The main contract for the construction of the aircraft carrier CVN-79, as planned, will be concluded in 2013 year.

The cutting ceremony for the first steel for CVN-79 was held in December 2011 at the shipyard of the company Northrop Grumman Shipbliding (now Huntington Ingalls Industries) in Newport News (Virginia).

The supply of the US Navy CVN-79 is scheduled for 2020 year.

The new aircraft carrier, while maintaining the design of the AVMA Nimitz hull, will have advanced technical capabilities, including a new command and control system, a redesigned superstructure, electromagnetic catapults, a new aerofinisher, an increased landing deck, a new nuclear power plant and an improved electrical system.

The use of new technologies will reduce the load on the crew and reduce its number, as well as to reduce the total operating cost by 5 billion, compared with the AVM Nimitz.
Originator:
http://www.armstrade.org
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. vorobey
    vorobey 25 July 2012 13: 51
    +7
    Bad sign.

    Kennedy failed.
    1. VAF
      VAF 25 July 2012 14: 25
      +2
      Quote: vorobey

      Bad sign.


      Hi Sanya! +! And they are amers from Satan, so they don’t believe in signs .... recourse

      But on the background of the news that we have laid a new boat ... anti-sabotage ???? thing of course needed. but somehow ... it doesn’t look very good ... don’t you find it?
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 25 July 2012 14: 34
        +3
        You know earring. during the time of Peter the powerful Swedish fleet and galleys were jammed. I wrote to you in the next branch, I hope it will reach ours that the countdown has gone. Friendship ends where money begins. and our friendship with China against America will last until the dragon grows up.

        Serega honestly, this is what I do not like about you flyers in your eternal damn- What if it doesn’t fly away? Some kind of constant skepticism and pissemism.
        It will fly, at least once, at least from top to bottom, but it will fly.

        And we said so - We’ll drink everything, but we won’t disgrace the fleet, and to us, according to your member, your maritime signs.

        We will teach you to believe in signs, they themselves will get stronger from themselves.
        1. VAF
          VAF 25 July 2012 15: 32
          +2
          Quote: vorobey
          Seryoga honestly, this is what I do not like about you flyers. Damn your eternal. But what if it doesn’t fly?


          Sanya, so it’s from the specifics of the profession, it’s impossible to jump on it ... it’s clear that if it is necessary, we’ll fly on ... a stool (not in the sense of a Furniture Worker) but in direct, but .... I would like to. that would be without a miss and for sure ... but with this we unfortunately have problems.

          And I would like, if I have to .. not just fly off then, because I know a lot, I know how to do it even more, but at one time ..... they’ll be not enough, because they ... billions ... work and work not tirelessly !!!!!!!

          But you understand, they all, dogs do and modernize, test and apply, and we all ... meetings, plans. Definition where, etc. (I'm purely about aviation!).

          Just recently, yesterday, in my opinion, the An-124th was again procrastinating ... How much is already possible ??? After all, it should even be clear to a goat that the plane is absolutely necessary, that it is not there, it is urgent to do it, and all ..... the cat is pulled by the balls, how special, damn it ....!

          And Amer silent glanders ..... do and do ....

          On July 20, Lockheed Martin delivered the fifth so-called US Air Force to Robins Air Force Base (Georgia). "Production" aircraft C-5M Super Galaxy.



          Thus, including three prototypes, the US Air Force received eight upgraded Super Galaxy aircraft. The aircraft will be painted in the interior at the Stuart Airbase (NY) of the US National Guard before heading to its permanent location in Dover, Delaware.

          I read everything about the Chinese and answered, all correctly and correctly! drinks
      2. Tirpitz
        Tirpitz 25 July 2012 15: 15
        +5
        This future handsome man can be seen at the shipyard. the outline of the body is already visible. A CVN-65 is moored nearby. Quickly build, bastards.
        1. urzul
          urzul 25 July 2012 15: 25
          +3
          in the photo is USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) which will replace the standing USS Enterprise (CVN-65), and CVN-79 "John F. Kennedy", which is only on paper.
          1. vorobey
            vorobey 25 July 2012 15: 40
            +1
            Quote: urzul
            still on papers only.

            let it stay there.
          2. Tirpitz
            Tirpitz 25 July 2012 15: 53
            +3
            So I know that too. I meant that they are building quickly.
            1. Russ -
              Russ - 25 July 2012 16: 32
              +1
              So that it burns out or explodes in them - that's what you could wish for !!
      3. GG2012
        GG2012 25 July 2012 16: 34
        +4
        For vaf (1) Today, 14:25

        Russian rocket industry, represented by Club-K container missile system, welcomes the construction of a new American target - aircraft carrier CVN-79 "John F. Kennedy" US Navy.

        We are announcing: the novelty of 2014 - a complex of air defense systems from a doghouse and from a hamster's mink.
        1. GG2012
          GG2012 25 July 2012 16: 55
          +3
          For aircraft carriers, aggressive international politics is needed. Russia does not have one.
        2. Russ -
          Russ - 25 July 2012 19: 26
          +1
          Quote: GG2012
          complex SAM from a doghouse and from a mink hamster

          Club-M complex. The idea of ​​its creation has ripened since about 1,5 years ago. We talked about him a lot of good! What can seriously affect the geopolitics and politics of many countries, cooling overly hot heads.
          1. GG2012
            GG2012 25 July 2012 19: 55
            +2
            For Russ - Today, 19:26 ↑
            "... India became the first foreign customer of the sea-based Club missile system. Surface and underwater missile systems are installed on Project 11356 frigates (Talwar type) and Project 877EKM diesel submarines of the Indian Navy, built by Russian enterprises. Club is installed when carrying out repair and modernization works on them.

            • Club missile system is also available China agreements were reached on deliveries to several more countries. Iran and Venezuela have already expressed their interest in purchasing the new product, according to the Sunday Telegraph. "

            My personal guess:
            Russia will not sell the RK Club-k to Syria. But China can. Him %%%.


            And in general, it seems to me that the story with the "undelivered helicopters" looked like a screen for the Americans. Who needs these helicopters now? Syria needs missiles.
  2. itr
    itr 25 July 2012 13: 52
    0
    Lift pumps ????? 44 million
    pulls more on a set of underwear and slippers for the crew.
  3. lds040580
    lds040580 25 July 2012 14: 06
    0
    wow there kickbacks laughing laughing laughing
    1. Russ -
      Russ - 25 July 2012 16: 34
      +1
      Reefs and pitfalls to him under the keel !!! - yes more.
      Or so that like the Titanic - which iceberg entered and that the kayuk he and the vultures came on it.
      1. Tsim
        Tsim 29 July 2012 19: 18
        0
        Quote: Russ -
        Or so as a Titanic - which iceberg entered


        They love lighthouses more laughing
  4. Starksa
    Starksa 25 July 2012 14: 16
    +1
    I wonder how much it costs taxpayers to build a melt table
    1. VAF
      VAF 25 July 2012 14: 23
      0
      Quote: StarkSA
      I wonder how much it costs taxpayers to build a melt table


      Well, would you ask how much it cost us to design a Super Jet ??? Or weak ... ????
      1. bddrus
        bddrus 25 July 2012 14: 42
        +2
        otherwise it’s not for the Internet without him, I wonder how he flies, because you pour so much shit on everything Russian
        1. vorobey
          vorobey 25 July 2012 14: 55
          +4
          Japanese city, Ruslan plus you. Got a Grenade?
          1. VAF
            VAF 25 July 2012 15: 36
            -1
            Quote: vorobey
            Ruslan plus you. Got a Grenade?


            Sanya killed, for which, plus that, for stupidity and stupidity ????

            What will he say when the accounting chamber officially announces his data ???

            Oh yes. I forgot that the Great and Almighty announced that there is an order for 170 pieces ... that means ... all the chiki-farts !!! wassat
            1. Starksa
              Starksa 25 July 2012 15: 50
              +1
              killed for what? it’s just that usa also saws loot afigenno, that for the money that they spend on their tables, we can build 3 heavy aircraft carrier cruisers
              1. VAF
                VAF 25 July 2012 16: 19
                +1
                Quote: StarkSA

                killed for what?


                I killed, in the sense that I supported this unreasonable plus! request

                Why doesn’t anyone want to notice that the very purpose of Super was to cut the butterflies, no more, and not care about the rejoicing of the domestic aviation industry!
                To you, +! good
                1. FID
                  FID 25 July 2012 16: 23
                  +2
                  I would slightly correct. Concern for the collapse of the aviation industry, and not its re-birth!
                  1. VAF
                    VAF 25 July 2012 16: 31
                    0
                    Quote: SSI

                    I would slightly correct


                    Namesake, hello, I agree completely, +! good
        2. VAF
          VAF 25 July 2012 15: 34
          +1
          Quote: bddrus
          I generally wonder how he flies, because you pour so much shit on everything Russian


          Vyunosh, Nuka where did you see the Russian Super Jet ?????

          And then blurt out the language without thinking already at school do not teach ???
      2. urzul
        urzul 25 July 2012 15: 00
        +4
        I still couldn’t understand that it hurts my eyes in the title of the article;))
        US Navy Supplements 44 million dollars for the construction of the aircraft carrier CVN-79 "John F. Kennedy"

        Or is it the first tranche or typo, since the first ship in the series will cost 1000 times more;)))
        $ 42,5 billion

        Thus, Sergey, it’s possible to trick almost 90 SSJ projects with this money.
        Nice comparison?
        1. vorobey
          vorobey 25 July 2012 15: 04
          +3
          Andrei is beautiful, I didn’t think, and in general I didn’t begin to read the name of the ship anymore. and the veteran kick for skepticism mine is in fashion. let's return self-confidence to man, since beat determines consciousness.
        2.  pistons
          pistons 25 July 2012 15: 19
          +1
          Where does this figure come from? belay I read that about 5 mln dollars apiece .. together with R&D.
          1. vorobey
            vorobey 25 July 2012 15: 27
            +2
            When fu22 advertised were also sealed up, now customers are clutching their heads.
            1. dreamer
              dreamer 25 July 2012 15: 40
              +2
              Quote: vorobey
              When fu22 advertised were also sealed up, now customers are clutching their heads.

              Then the same mistake was made when advertising Fu35 laughing
          2. urzul
            urzul 25 July 2012 15: 50
            +3
            RU tape from April 4.
            In addition, the aircraft carrier Gerald Ford is among the projects that have risen in price. Its value has grown from $ 40,3 billion to $ 42,5 billion.

            I add that given the deadline for 2015 year is not the last rise in price.
        3. VAF
          VAF 25 July 2012 16: 12
          +6
          Quote: urzul
          Thus, Sergey, it’s possible to trick almost 90 SSJ projects with this money.
          Nice comparison?


          Andrew, welcome, +! No comparison is not beautiful! Why, so let's take the tonnage of Super's weight and Kennedy's weight ... then everything will fall into place!

          And how it will not reach you all. that I’m not against Super (of course against, but for completely different reasons that you all and Sparrow and for some reason do not want to or stubbornly do not want to notice) ????

          Moreover, 2intelligent "boy was hitched here by Sparrow, with a grenade, ha-ha-ha-.!

          Here I am now ... "I will throw a grenade" for you ... I would like to hear a decent decent answer ... beh ha-ha !!!

          So:

          1. omit the fact that crazy money was thrown into Super !!!
          2. omit the fact that almost 85% of it consists of imported components (jobs there, royalties there, Boeing gesheft design there, etc.)
          And we have a screwdriver assembly ... okay .. god be with him.

          But even for a foreign helicopter in the Moscow Region a new plant will be created ???? Clearly, there is its own scheme, they didn’t come up with anything new .... it’s too good in helicopter engineering, it’s time to reduce it .... bully

          But your Super, if you are not in the know, is not going to a new factory built for these purposes, and the production of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SSJ-100) takes place in NAPO them. V.P. Chkalova.



          Which ... as if incidentally engaged in the production of the Su-34's



          and on KnAAPO:



          Which is engaged in the release of the Su-35's ....





          Well ... naturally T-50s:



          So maybe this is the main reason that we have a tiny supply of Su-34s and a tiny supply of Su-35s ????

          And in my opinion there should be such a picture in the workshops ..... when there was no Super-duper ... and we had the Su-27th in service .....



          Well dear sirs ... we wait, s ..... answers ... or the next grenades ... drinks
          1. vorobey
            vorobey 25 July 2012 16: 37
            +3
            Serge, I always understood your emotions and heartache, but this is not a reason to cycle. Recall 90 that we had, and perhaps not in the bright era of Chubais-Gaidar liberal democracy, the leading positions in aviation, shipbuilding, and space were taken away. thank God that after 20 years with a creak, a screwdriver, but something is being done, but not much, but at least something. It’s good to raise a country out of ruin having an idea and a will, and what we currently have What kind of idea we have and whose will ..

            And to restore everything and immediately oh how hard. So you did not convince me with all due respect. Or am I so stupid and brave as the marines should be, or cheers as a patriot, as you say.
            1. VAF
              VAF 25 July 2012 18: 05
              +1
              Quote: vorobey
              It’s good to raise a country out of ruin having an idea and a will, and what we currently have What kind of idea we have and whose will ..


              Sanya, stop you in the wrong place or just don’t know what to answer?

              What does devastation have to do with ???
              NAPO and KnAPO nobody destroyed, the plants worked fine, what does it mean ???

              I asked a specific question, why the hell did you have to put the fucking production of nobody useless aircraft into factories that produce equipment so needed for our country and army ????

              Question damn it for the first class ???

              Or are we going to fight on Super-dupers ???

              The fact that you are brave do not doubt in the least, that you are a true patriot, do not ascribe yourself to the Uryakal!

              But here is the fact that you cannot recognize white as white. and not black ... this is bad .... well, what will we convince

              Although here I have given such a convincing example that ... even your Rustam from kindergarten should understand .... well, if not, then ... let him train on the minuses!
              1. vorobey
                vorobey 25 July 2012 18: 18
                +1
                Serega I am not a strong economist, but I think that Profit from the super will go to the products so needed, or to build a new plant. I can sincerely be mistaken I do not exclude. If now all the funds and the budget are thrown only PAKFA, PAKDA, again our pensioners will switch to bread with water. if dry has the potential to develop independently why not. But Amer’s planes do not fly on our titanium?
                1. VAF
                  VAF 25 July 2012 19: 25
                  0
                  Quote: vorobey
                  I am not a strong economist,


                  Sanya, what did you see as an economist in me?

                  But I’ll disappoint you anyway, here are economists, the real ones really thought that the mature arrived (in pure form) would appear only after that. as 25-30 years old Super will be sold at the catalog price, but not like now, on lease!

                  And what does the PAK have to do with it, although the same thing is necessary .. We have so many Su-34s, Su-35s, Su-30s, Su-39s .... the finished developments are completely to the small Su-34 (Su-27KUB) -here and the revival of the ISA, because the extreme war has shown that you only hate stormtroopers, especially with such stuffing as on them!

                  Therefore, the development of Sukhoi as a company producing civilian aircraft .... this is PANAMA!
                  1. vorobey
                    vorobey 25 July 2012 19: 52
                    +1
                    Banks pay leasing immediately.

                    Although in some respects I agree with you. I am not special in aviation.
              2. FID
                FID 25 July 2012 18: 31
                +4
                Serge! Spit on the cons. Take care of your nerves! Normal people understand where the legs grow from! After all, it is already clear to experts that the super failed. Well, they don’t take it with domestic a / c, only under pressure (for example, Transaero: to become the designated carrier, in addition to the AFL, to Italy and France). But a lot of people will scream that they say it’s not necessary to destroy domestic industry. At the same time, forgetting that there are other aircraft. This is my job
                1. Starksa
                  Starksa 25 July 2012 21: 04
                  +1
                  I know that Transaero has large plans for the purchase of 4x A-380 and another Tu-214
          2. urzul
            urzul 25 July 2012 17: 01
            0
            tskukpvtsuyutsutsupkep
          3. saturn.mmm
            saturn.mmm 25 July 2012 17: 18
            +3
            Quote: vaf
            Well, dear gentlemen ... wait, sir .....

            I do not understand what for Sukhoi slipped a Superjet. Well, Tupolev, Ilyushin somehow understand. And this turns out to be some kind of hemorrhoid, one might think people without work were sitting duck at least with something to load.
            I fully support Sergey vaf. And it's not pissemism.
            Something strange just happens, such as deep integration with the West.
          4. urzul
            urzul 25 July 2012 17: 19
            +1
            I can’t insert a photo, because only a link to LJ
            there you can find photos of shops and Su-34 and Su-35 and CCJ
            http://gelio-nsk.livejournal.com/172070.html
            1. VAF
              VAF 25 July 2012 17: 59
              +2
              Quote: urzul

              I can not insert a photo


              Andrew, why, I already inserted them ??? and Su-34 and Su-35 and your Super-duper in neighboring workshops, all photos of this year ???
          5. leon-iv
            leon-iv 25 July 2012 19: 01
            0
            1. omit the fact that crazy money was thrown into Super !!!
            Your opinion where did they go?
            ., designed by Boeing Gesheft
            Here I do not agree with you. Our organization entered into a similar project management contract with their daughter. The result is extremely good.
            and the production of Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SSJ-100) takes place in NAPO them. V.P. Chkalova.
            And you don’t confuse MS-21 which isn’t there yet; I only know about KNAAPO
            So maybe this is the main reason that we have a tiny supply of Su-34s and a tiny supply of Su-35s ????
            Are you sure that everyone is ready to supply the subcontractor in large volumes?
            1. VAF
              VAF 25 July 2012 19: 30
              0
              Quote: leon-iv
              Your opinion where did they go?


              To do this, you need to visit the Cote d'Azur, well, and inquire next year about the state of the wives .... of the richest wives in the world, that of the deputies, that of the leaders !!!


              Quote: leon-iv
              Here I do not agree with you. Our organization entered into a similar project management contract with their daughter. The result is extremely good.


              Compare the aerodynamic line-up of Dream and Super ... be very surprised (all over the glider).


              Quote: leon-iv
              And you don’t confuse MS-21 which isn’t there yet; I only know about KNAAPO


              I never confuse what I’ve been doing all my life. MS-21 is the Irkut factory.


              Quote: leon-iv
              Are you sure that everyone is ready to supply the subcontractor in large volumes?


              And what’s the problem? After all, supplies are exported at a horse-pace and nothing ... can they cope or do you think that an increase in the output of components will adversely affect the allied enterprises ???
              1. leon-iv
                leon-iv 26 July 2012 00: 48
                +1
                To do this, you need to visit the Cote d'Azur, well, and inquire next year about the state of the wives .... of the richest wives in the world, that of the deputies, that of the leaders !!!
                it’s not a matter of fact because the villas are millions and there they operate with billions
                Compare the aerodynamic line-up of Dream and Super ... be very surprised (all over the glider).
                I am not surprised because I know that the glider that the toga that the other worked out with us. Then the Boeing decided to be greedy and calculate the Indians got troubles then it was considered with us.
                But at the same time, I perfectly know how to manage the projects of Boeing managers. I have a feeling that they were learning from Beria.
                And what’s the problem, after all, supplies are exported at horse-pace
                Here is an example from the recent past.
                We order a batch of certain units. Requirements compliance with international certificates on XXXXXXXXXX answer is not interesting to us (they did not bring it to the director). Not a question, our suck paw is bought from Italy
                and Czechs. Those for a year have established release and certified. And if it were an isolated case ((((
  5. rinzhak
    rinzhak 25 July 2012 15: 05
    +2
    interesting, and in Russia they will call warships "Dmitry Medvedev" "Boris Yeltsin" or "Vladimir Putin" laughing
    1. Kars
      Kars 25 July 2012 15: 06
      +4
      Quote: rinzhak
      "Boris Yeltsin"

      Will work on alcohol.
      1. rinzhak
        rinzhak 25 July 2012 15: 14
        0
        Quote: Kars
        Will work on alcohol.

        Now it would be better to call new armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles "Lev Rokhlin" и "Gennady Troshev" The Americans have BMP BRADLEY
      2. vorobey
        vorobey 25 July 2012 15: 16
        +5
        Firstly, not on alcohol, but on environmentally friendly fuel.


        In recent years, the long tradition of the Russian fleet has been restored to give warships the names of the saints of the Russian Orthodox Church. For example, the two large landing ships of the Pacific Fleet were given the names of the heroes of the Battle of Kulikovo of the holy monks of the monks Alexander Peresvet and Andrey Oslyaby. More than 100 years ago, ships with such names already existed in the Russian fleet, thus historical succession was restored. Previously, these ships had numbered names.

        In 2005, the diesel submarine was named "St. Nicholas the Wonderworker" in connection with the establishment of patronage over it by the St. Nicholas the Wonderworker Charitable Foundation.

        A series of submarines named after Russian princes - Dmitry Donskoy, Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky, Vladimir Monomakh - were produced in Severodvinsk.

        At present, they are also beginning to build a new nuclear-powered submarine, which will bear the name of Nicholas the Wonderworker. The submarine "St. Nicholas" will be included in a series of submarines with new strategic weapons.

        When the new border patrol ship was named, it was decided to continue the tradition of Soviet times, it was named "Rubin".

        The Navy continues to maintain the old tradition: when ships get old and are scrapped, their names are passed on to new ones. At the same time, new traditions appear, for example, to call ships by the names of firms. In 2003, the diesel-electric submarine was named Alrosa.

        New types of ships have now appeared, so the tradition of naming ships is being transformed. The new artillery ship was named after the city of Astrakhan. The type of this ship knows no analogues in the world, because the ship was specially designed taking into account the features of the Caspian Sea and the Volga Delta.

        The first ships of the series of frigates bear the names of the founders of the country's ocean-going military fleet (Admiral Gorshkov, Admiral Kasatonov), although according to the Soviet classification they belong to patrol ships.

        A series of newest corvettes are called adjectives ("Guardian", "Clever", "Boyky", "Steadfast").

        But at the same time, the newest frigate-class patrol ship was named Yaroslav the Wise, although the lead ship of this series is called Fearless.

        And the Baltic Fleet communications ship was named after Admiral Fedor Golovin.

        In Russia, a special department in the Ministry of Defense deals with the selection of names for warships. A questionnaire is drawn up for a named ship, a "birth certificate" is issued.
        http://ria.ru/spravka/20100331/216340762.html

        So the leaders do not shine.
        1. Kars
          Kars 25 July 2012 15: 22
          +2
          Quote: vorobey
          So the leaders do not shine.


          Since the Russian Federation has not yet introduced full-fledged aircraft carriers into operation, so everything else can happen.

          But what about .Varyag .. like a heroic name, but somehow unlucky.
          Quote: vorobey
          "Dmitry Donskoy", "Yuri Dolgoruky", "Alexander Nevsky", "Vladimir Monomakh".

          Previously, armored cruisers were called during the Republic of Ingushetia. Don and Monomakh died under Tsushima.

          The Yankees --- destroyers were called by the names of their heroes. Cruisers as cities, battleships as states.
          1. rinzhak
            rinzhak 25 July 2012 15: 24
            0
            Quote: Kars
            The Yankees --- destroyers were called

            agree, nevertheless, their presidents have louder names ...
            1. Kars
              Kars 25 July 2012 15: 31
              +3
              Especially clinton and bush ml
              1. rinzhak
                rinzhak 25 July 2012 15: 38
                0
                Quote: Kars
                Especially clinton and bush ml

                well George W. Bush (senior) it’s kind of like such an aircraft carrier already exists, but Damn Clinton didn’t deserve it - for ethical reasons. By the way, the ship sounds good - "Barack Obama"
                1. Sablezub
                  Sablezub 26 July 2012 12: 41
                  0
                  Better Barn Oban laughing
              2. saturn.mmm
                saturn.mmm 25 July 2012 18: 59
                0
                Quote: Kars
                Especially clinton and bush ml

                Andrei under Clinton, although he lit up with women, the US economy developed very well, in his time even external debt began to decline, so they can call him by his name, and I think it is justly deserved.
                Well, Bush Jr. Well, something like your picture, he even read Dostoevsky, it’s easy to guess which of the novels.
            2. 11Goor11
              11Goor11 25 July 2012 16: 32
              0
              rinzhak
              agree, nevertheless, their presidents have louder names ...

              Well, why ...
              vorobey
              The submarine "St. Nicholas" will be included in a series of submarines with new strategic weapons.

              Strategic cruiser, carrier of nuclear weapons "St. Nicholas", as it were, even hints very much that it can consecrate the land infected with the sin of Sodom
          2. vorobey
            vorobey 25 July 2012 15: 35
            +4
            After the defeat in the battle of Tsushima, an admiralty committee was established and collection of donations for the restoration of the fleet began. 17 destroyers were built. And they were given the names of the donors (most of them). so among them were “Kazanets”, “Ukraine”, “Turkmenets Stavropolsky”, “Emir of Bukhara”, “Don Cossack”, “Zabaykalets”, “Finn”, “Moskvityan”, etc. Finn, by the way, in honor of the Grand Duchy of Finland.

            By the way, I will not mind if the promising APRK is called Chekist Putin.
        2. Sablezub
          Sablezub 26 July 2012 01: 16
          +1
          a small inaccuracy ... not Andrei Oslyabya, but Rodion Oslyabya ... wink
          1. vorobey
            vorobey 26 July 2012 10: 38
            +2
            Rodion Oslyabya (Andrey as a monk, secular name - Rodion or Roman)

            When a person takes tonsure, he renounces all worldly things, including on behalf of. In the same way, when baptized, a person receives a middle name, not the fact that it will be different. so that and so right.
    2. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm 25 July 2012 18: 52
      0
      Quote: rinzhak
      interesting, but in Russia they will call warships "Dmitry Medvedev" "Boris Yeltsin" or "Vladimir Putin"

      Now, if under Medvedev or Putin a full-fledged aircraft carrier equal to "John F. Kenedy" is built, then you can call them after them, they still have a chance.
      And the name of Yeltsin and Gorbachev can only be called a brush for a point.
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 25 July 2012 19: 06
        +1
        No need to defame the brilliant name of the brush.
  6. rinzhak
    rinzhak 25 July 2012 15: 29
    +1
    although, if the Fleet hadn’t had such misogyny, then according to American and British criteria, it would be quite reasonable to name the ship "Condoleezza Rice" и "Margaret Hilda Thatcher" Well, if not a ship, then a cruise missile or a torpedo for sure! laughing )))
  7. suharev-52
    suharev-52 25 July 2012 21: 40
    +1
    Well, the Americans are closing another ship, and we? Sincerely.
    1. Sablezub
      Sablezub 26 July 2012 17: 14
      0
      let them lay ... they need to attack, and we need ships for defense against the plague democracy of the world ... the tasks are different
  8. Sablezub
    Sablezub 25 July 2012 22: 14
    +1
    Good evening, gentlemen. Again, the Reserve Financial System drew pieces of paper for the United States and NATO ... hence the new aircraft carrier appeared in the shipyards ... so the "lamb for the slaughter" is being prepared again ... I wonder who is after Syria? Most likely Iran .. The Rothschilds and Rockefellers need a war, and not a local one ... when the super-enrichment of these clans (owners of the printing press) began in the Second World War ... Now they want repetition ... and new super profits ... and they will go out of their way to to drag Russia into this sartir and I think China ... How damn it is all disgusting and disgusting!