Sohu: It’s not an indisputable fact that Putin’s readiness to go to the elections of 2024

128
Sohu: It’s not an indisputable fact that Putin’s readiness to go to the elections of 2024

РќР ° стрР° РЅРёС † Р ° С ... китР° Р№СЃРєРѕРіРѕ медиР° ресурсР° Sohu РѕРїСѓР ± Р » РЅ РїРѕР »РёС‚РёС ‡ еским СЃРѕР ± С‹ тиям РІ Р РѕСЃСЃРёРё. Автор СЂР ° СЃСЃРєР ° Р · С ‹РІР ° ет С З РёС‚Р ° телям Рѕ том, С З С‚Рѕ РИ РсСЃСЃРёРё РІР ° СЂР» С ‹РІРѕРїСЂР ° РІРєРё РІ РљРѕРЅСЃС‚РёС‚СѓС † РёСЋ, РІРѕ котѾры Рј состоится РІСЃРЂРРРРРРРРРПРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРПРРРРРРРРРПРРРРРРРРРРРРРПРРРРРРРРРРПР RћRґRЅR ° Röhr SЃRѕRїSѓS,SЃS,RІSѓSЋS · ‰ ... Roes S,RμRј, RєRѕS,RѕSЂR ° SЏ RїRѕRґRЅSЏS,R ° PI Sohu, â € "RІRѕR · RјRѕR¶RЅRѕSЃS,SЊ RґR" SЏ P'P "P ° ° RґRoRјRoSЂR RџSѓS, РёРЅР ° РЅР ° С ‡ Р ° ть СЃ РЅСѓР »СЏ РѕС‚СЃС З С'С‚ преР· РёРґРµРЅС‚СЃРєРёС ... СЃСЂРѕРєРѕРІ.

From the material:



Р РССЃСЃРёР№СЃРєРёР№ РїР ° СЂР »Р ° мент С „Р ° РєС‚РёС ‡ ески СЂР ° Р · СЂРµС € Р ° ет Р'Р »Р ° РґРёРјРёРЂСРѓСРѓР ° С ±Р ° С ±Р ° С ±С °Р ° С С‚СЊ Р ± еР· РѕРіСЂР ° РЅРёС ‡ ений. RџSЂRo RЅS <RЅRμS € RЅRμRј SЂRμR№S,RoRЅRіRμ RїSЂRμR · RoRґRμRЅS,R ° F RѕSЃSЃRoRo RІRμR "RoRєR RІRμSЂRѕSЏS,RЅRѕSЃS,SЊ S,RѕRіRѕ ° C ‡ S,Rѕ SЂRѕSЃSЃRoSЏRЅRμ SЃ RіRѕS,RѕRІRЅRѕSЃS,SЊSЋ RїSЂRoRјSѓS, S,R ° РєРѕРµ РЅРѕРІС € ество. RљR R¶RμS,SЃSЏ ° C ‡ S,Rѕ SЂRѕSЃSЃRoSЏRЅRμ RІSЂRμRјRμRЅRЅRѕ P · ° F ± F C <F "of the PS Ryo RїR ° RґRμRЅRoRo RєSѓSЂSЃR SЂSѓR ° ± P" SЏ Ryo RґSЂSѓRіRoS SЌRєRѕRЅRѕRјRoS ‡ ... ... RμSЃRєRoS RїSЂRѕR ± P "RμRјR ° FROM…. R еР° Р »РёР · уемы Р№ РІР »Р ° РЅ поможет укрепить вертикР° Р »СЊ РІР» Р ° сти РІ РёРЃС.

R ”R ° R» RµRµ RєРёС‚Р ° Р№СЃРєРёР№ R ° втор предлР° РіР ° ет РІСЃС 'же РЅРµ СЃРїРµС € ить СЃ РІС ‹РІРґ РћС‚РјРµС З РµРЅРѕ, С З С‚Рѕ РЅРµ СЏРІР »СЏРµС‚СЃСЏ неосворимы Рј С РѕСЂС ‹2024 РіРѕРґР °.

From the material:

Рђ С ‡ то если Путин РЅРµ РїР» Р ° РЅРёСЂСѓРµС ‚остР° ться -“ кто его СЃРјРµРЅРёС ‚? Путин РѕС З З РµРЅСЊ умело дерС'тся, РїСЂРё этом РІ его R · РґСЂР ° РІРѕРјРІР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р Р РЅРµ СЃС‚РѕРёС ‚РЅРµРґРѕРѕС † енивР° ть тР° РєРѕРіРѕ Р» идерР°.

Автор РїРёС € РµС ‚, С З С‚Рѕ Путин РЅРµ С… РѕС З З РµС‚ РѕСЃР »Р ° Р ± R» ять СЃСѓС ‰ РµСЃС‚РІСѓСЋС ‰РѓРѓРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋ Р ° сти, РєР ° Рє это Р ± С ‹Р» Рѕ РїСЂРё РЅРµРєРѕС‚РѕСЂС ‹С ... его РїСЂРµРґС € ественникР° С ....

From the article:

НеР· Р ° РІРёСЃРёРјРѕ РѕС ‚того, РєР ° РєСѓСЋ РґРѕР» жность Путин Р · Р ° ймеинннЌЌЌЌЌЌЌЌЌЁЌЌЌЌЌЌЁЌЌЌЌЁЌЌЌЌЌйЌЌЌйЌЌйЌР° SЃS,Ro RїRѕSЃR "Rμ 2024 RіRѕRґR °, RѕRЅ RІSЃRμ SЂR RІRЅRѕ ° F ± SѓRґRμS, SЃS ‡ RoS,R S,SЊSЃSЏ ° C RμRЅS,SЂRѕRј RІR †" ° F SЃS,Ro, RїRѕ RєSЂR ° R№RЅRμR№ RјRμSЂRμ СЂР ° РІРЅС ‹Рј, РґР ° же РїРѕРґР ° РІР» СЏСЋС ‰ РёРј. Р РССЃСЃРёСЏ РїСЂРѕС € Р »Р ° преР· идентство МедведеРИР °, РєРѕРіРґР ° РІРѕР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р ° Р 'то время Путин Р ± С ‹Р» СЃР ° РјС ‹Рј РІР» иятельны Рј РїРѕР »РёС‚РёРєРѕРј Р РѕСЃСЃРёРё. RS‚Рѕ, вероятно, РїСЂРѕРґРѕР »Р¶РёС‚СЃСЏ. Р • СЃР »Рё ему СѓРґР ° стся СЃРїСЂР ° виться СЃ современнСРСРСРЀааааааааааР° Ѕ РЅС ‹Рј РїРѕР» итиком, Рё ему РґР »СЏ этого РґР ° же РЅРµ нужно Р · Р ° РЅРёРјР ° ЂиииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииР° Р »СЊРЅС‹ Рµ РґРѕР »Р¶РЅРѕСЃС‚Рё.

R 'Sohu РѕС‚РјРµС З Р ° ется Р ° вторитР° СЂРЅС ‹Р№ С ... Р ° СЂР ° ктер действуЎР·РРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРР RїSЂRo SЌS,RѕRј SЃRѕRѕR C ± ‰ P RμS,SЃSЏ ° C ‡ S,Rѕ RѕRЅ In "RґR" SЏ SЃRμR ± SЏ RѕS RμSЂS,RoR ‡ "· RєSЂSѓRі RІRѕR RјRѕR¶RЅS <C ... PI RїSЂRμRμRјRЅRoRєRѕRІ 3-5 C ‡ еловек».
128 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    12 March 2020 13: 39
    Did Tereshkova write an article to the Chinese?
    1. +11
      12 March 2020 13: 43
      If this is not an indisputable fact, why then do it now, and the meanness is that everything is included in a "single package"? Why not leave it to the conscience of the next leaders? And attention is drawn to the "politicians" who came out with this initiative Tereshkova and Valuev. The most unpleasant thing is that ordinary people are held for idiots, snatching this nonsense.
      It’s hard in Russia to part with power.
      1. +6
        12 March 2020 13: 48
        And attention is drawn to the "politicians" who came out with this initiative Tereshkova and Valuev.
        These figures are not for a career. They are for bread, but with black caviar ...
        1. +12
          12 March 2020 13: 51
          The Russian parliament actually allows Vladimir Putin to work without Borders.

          The Russian parliament cannot ban Putin. It is actually a useless, but very expensive tool. Its main role is to show the appearance of a democratic separation of powers.

          Russians are willing to accept such an innovation. It seems that the Russians have temporarily forgotten about the depreciation of the ruble and other economic problems.

          The more they beat, the more they love.
          1. +13
            12 March 2020 13: 59
            Quote: Stas157
            Its main role is to show the appearance of a democratic separation of powers.

            But as they show their rapid activity laughing
            Quote: Stas157
            The more they beat, the more they love.

            However, beating means love. wink
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. +12
              12 March 2020 14: 57
              Let's vote on the amendments not as a package, but for each item separately!
              I am sure that many will be held, but you do not want to vote separately, you need in bulk.
              And by the way, I look forward to publishing the full list of amendments that they want to include in the Constitution.
              And then maybe we shouldn’t break the spears here?
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. 0
                  12 March 2020 15: 02
                  in the invented money-box you can vote absolutely any way, I think.

                  Those. Are you for the batch vote, I understand correctly?
                  1. +1
                    12 March 2020 15: 05
                    yes, but I would expand the package by banning property ownership abroad for officials

                    1. +5
                      12 March 2020 15: 08
                      I would also increase the number of amendments. I do not argue.
                      But to vote in a package - is it not a departure from the principles of democracy? So to say, political manipulation? Do not find? laughing
                    2. +9
                      12 March 2020 17: 39
                      Quote: s-t Petrov
                      but I would still expand the package by banning property ownership abroad for officials

                      and Putin is against!
              2. -5
                12 March 2020 15: 32
                Quote: Honest Citizen
                By the way, I’m waiting for the full list of amendments to be included in the Constitution to be published.

                Are you banned on the Internet? Find Amendment Bill - Lom?
                1. +2
                  12 March 2020 15: 36
                  Are you banned on the Internet? Find Amendment Bill - Lom?

                  The State Duma, the Council of the Federation and the Legislative Assembly of the regions will vote for the bill on constitutional amendments for the week. And the president will sign the document on March 18 - on the day of the annexation of Crimea to Russia, RBC found out

                  Read more at RBC:
                  https://www.rbc.ru/politics/04/03/2020/5e5e5d7e9a79472a06eb61ad
            2. +6
              12 March 2020 14: 59
              Yes, who would doubt - if someone against the godfather says something, then they are exclusively enemies of the people. By the way, why else didn’t the turnover return to the codes?
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. +1
                  12 March 2020 15: 40
                  Common sense is an objective thing. But I understand that it is from the wrong sources - it does not count.
                  By the way, the US Democrats are in solidarity with you in this situation, if the information about the fraud against Sanders comes from "Russian hackers", then it seems to be true, but does not count. )))
            3. +6
              12 March 2020 15: 43
              Quote: s-t Petrov
              pseudo-communists merged in one choir and liberda

              And here is the representative of that love "tougher" - a pro-imperious adorer, a confused Petrov. Those who do not share his masochistic predilections, he stops with an angry cry. And urges everyone not to whine)))
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. -4
        12 March 2020 16: 05
        And let’s (so that some people finally get burned out) we’ll talk about the change of power, but not in Russia, where some of this song has already erased all its languages, but in the United States (so far).
        I love historical parallels. They are so parallel ...
        So, for a long time (more than one hundred and fifty years, for a minute) in the USA there were no restrictions on the number of terms for which the president can be elected. As long as people are satisfied, people continue to choose - let them rule.
        Everything changed during the Roosevelt presidency. It ruled for four terms - and not only successfully brought the country out of the Great Depression, but also made the United States one of the winners in World War II, which allowed the United States (which previously held openly secondary positions in world politics) to actually become a superpower and world hegemon.
        Roosevelt was not forgiven for success.
        A strong president was too strong. Strengthened by the state, which could not please corporations. And so it was bankers and corporations who lobbied for the amendment about “no more than two terms.”
        So it turns out that the “change of power” is needed where there are some shadow oligarchic elites who want to control the government and prevent the strengthening of the state. Where is that notorious Deep State, the deepest state.
        As the oligarchic sponsor of the mayor of Chicago in the TV series “The Boss” said, “We need such changes so that nothing changes.”
        In the USA, as we see, there is a change of power, because almost nothing depends on the president there. After all, real power is concentrated in the hands of the Fed and Wall Street (among bankers and the military-industrial complex).
        Very clearly: both Obama and Trump came to power with the slogans of ending the wars and the return of American soldiers home. But neither one nor the other managed to do this. Obama was forced to start two more new wars, Trump was on the verge of the same several times (and with Syria, and with North Korea, and with Iran).
        With a weak presidential power, a strong parliamentary one is obtained. And the parliament is formed by party sponsors.
        Again it is extremely clear: for ten years in the American Congress, despite regular elections, exactly 1 (in words: ONE) deputy has been replaced. And then, in view of the death of the previous one. All the other faces remained the same. At the arena all the same.
        And what real change of power are they talking about after that?
        Hired managers are changing, and puppeteers remain unchanged. Like in the UK, where the prime ministers change regularly, and the queen and members of the House of Lords are not elected and rule by inheritance.
        Screen, visibility, fiction, illusion - choose any term you like (we have democracy and freedom of choice, hehe). Because any of them is true.
        No change of power exists in nature (read Mark Twain, he is immortal). ANYWHERE. If the power changes (or rides a bicycle there and / or moves without bodyguards) - it means that nothing really depends on this “power”.
        Therefore, citizens, stop being led on illusions.
        1. 0
          12 March 2020 16: 25
          There it is! I thought that a powerful economy, a favorable position in the war, the absence of significant losses, rational management provided the opportunity to "actually become a superpower and a world hegemon." And this is one Roosevelt ...
          But in general, what's wrong? Presidents and parties are changing (awl on soap, yes))). COURSE remains. And this course is within the framework of the current 150 years of the constitution.
          “Trump has been on the verge of the same several times (with Syria, North Korea, and Iran)” - exactly so, but the independence of the branches of government DOES NOT ALLOW him to make such decisions alone.
          1. -2
            12 March 2020 16: 39
            unaha, I was horrified to understand that most commentators generally do not bother with the understanding of the text they are commenting on, and even more so, they do not try to consciously watch a fragment of a video. Pure reflection, not obscured by the work of the mind. Clip thinking in full growth. Many, in principle, do not even try to understand the difference between their personal perceptions (of their relatives, friends, acquaintances) and the statistics of the whole state, in which 147 million people live, on a vast part of the land and in completely different living conditions.
            Why does everyone look at Putin as a person, and not as a certain system or party? We do not blame the United States for its bipartisan system, which has been changing people for 250 years, but not changing its external and internal course and key bosses of America from the Fed, and after all, these people and these parties have always been in real power for centuries! And the preza election is like that, the owner decided to change the glove doll for 4-8 years to guide it through a well-known hole. In Britain, the same garbage, only abruptly - the real power of the eternal queens / th and the Rodschilds and two essentially identical little parties for centuries
      3. -5
        12 March 2020 16: 12
        maxim947
        I understand correctly that the bulk of those who are now attacking Tereshkova are the little people who supported the usurpation of power by Yeltsin in 1993, the Constitution of 93, written in the blood of slandered patriots, and the b-ugly performance with the elections of 5% Yeltsin in 96 ?
        I’m glorifying Comrade Caesar at least for the fact that he did not become like the Buonaparty and does not solve issues with the capital’s ochlos, which was crippled by significance, by buckshot. Believe the person who survived the tank shooting of parliament and your other democracy - it costs a lot. And it is precisely the reluctance to start the red wheel that provides Caesar with restrained popular love, and not the miserable 5% drunk Borusik.
        1. +3
          12 March 2020 16: 32
          All this sounds beautiful, but no more. No need to scare the people that everything will fall apart, they are already tired. And you don't need to think yourself irreplaceable. The duty of the authorities to carry out competent reforms, develop the country and build or maintain a political course. And not to usurp power. VVP did a lot of good things and for that special thanks to him, and history will judge the rest, for the pension reform, for the multimillion-dollar earnings of the heads of the state corporation, etc. , but my opinion is that he has already sat out, and most importantly, his entourage has sat out. There is no need to be afraid of changes, but for this it is necessary to create healthy political competition, and while "these rotten parties" sit in the Duma, unfortunately nothing will change. But since everything suits everyone, we will not see any changes in the near future.
          1. 0
            12 March 2020 16: 55
            maxim947, "no need to scare the people that everything will fall apart"))) Guys, why don't you really see what's going on in the world? Where is it - your "political competition", when and where was it or is it? In a Union with one party and its "leading role", which lasted only 70 years and then ruined itself? Or in Matrasia or Great Britain, where two parties of the same type are essentially the same for more than two centuries, and the real power belongs to the FRS systemists, who only change the condom like a glove doll and guide it through the hole known in the glove doll?
            You are strange people. What, once there was another system in Russia? And what is it all write "to cling to power." Guys, no one bothers to vote for any candidates, there are "communists", there is Yavlinsky, there is anyone)
            Why does everyone look at Putin as a person, and not as a certain system or party? We do not blame the United States for its bipartisan system, which has been changing people for 250 years, but not changing its external and internal course and key bosses of America from the Fed, and after all, these people and these parties have always been in real power for centuries! And the preza election is like that, the owner decided to change the glove doll for 4-8 years to guide it through a well-known hole.
            And what's wrong with Putin’s system? We are changing prime ministers, ministers who are responsible for internal affairs, governors. In fact, Putin, understanding the fragility of everything, simply acts as a guarantor of the very system, allowing the system to evolve through updating the administrative resource.
            Here are the Great rulers of Russia, Russia and how much they ruled (some approximately)
            1. Vladimir the Red Sun 37 years.
            2. Yaroslav the Wise 35 years.
            3. Vsevolod the Big Nest is 35 years old.
            4. Dmitry Donskoy is 29 years old.
            5. Ivan III, a collector of Russian land for 55 years.
            6. Ivan IV the Terrible 37 years.
            7. Peter I the Great 39 years.
            9. Catherine II the Great 34 years.
            10. Joseph Stalin 29 years
            PS And it's enough to waste time on Pension, the retirement age was raised a long time ago all over the world, Russia has just done it. In the States they raised it to 67 a long time ago, they raised it a few years ago (even in my small homeland of Belarus, they will still raise it now), in Britain and Germany they raised it to 68 and are going to, in China they systematically raise it to 70 (this is still provided that there only 30% of pence gets it, the rest of them only get help from their children). But only for some reason they decided to raise a wave through foreign NGOs and "independent" Internet media, apparently so that in some Britain - not ralliedsmile
        2. +2
          12 March 2020 16: 34
          Those. should I restrainedly love your Caesar for the fact that he has completely (so far) not gone mad?
          Tereshkov is not worthy to poison, of course. This is just an elderly honored man who was pushed to the podium to voice the people's will ..
          1. -2
            12 March 2020 17: 06
            edasko, stop carrying nonsense and re-read what I said above
            1. +1
              12 March 2020 17: 33
              That you are nonsense. Do you even get to know how in the states and Germany raised the retirement age. On the opening day of the World Cup? On the sly? This is their Siluanov said that 3 tr. per year, our pensioners will travel abroad? What are the kings to list? They weren’t re-elected because they were good? But what about the person who lies like breathing? Who promised that pence. age will not lift? Who promised to protect everyone in the Donbass? Who promised that there would be no more re-election? Here you are Sergey, tell me - is it a man or yap? Do you act like that too? What can you believe in him? So shit is your system that you could not build in 20 years. I want to have hope. China and I started together, they were even worse. And where is China now and where are we? The amount of resources is simply not comparable. For 20 years, stability and stagnation, stability and stagnation. Oil is getting more expensive, gas is getting more expensive. Oil is getting cheaper, gas is getting more expensive. Nothing changes except the Forbes list of billionaires. They have no money for retirement, but where did they go from the funds? Do not know?
              1. +4
                12 March 2020 19: 26
                edasko, you are boring, a set of clichés, your thought goes around in circles, the slogans of a memorized and liberal agitprop, one-on-one, like those of the network hohlomaidauns hanging out in Russian publics. Who started what with China? It was we who built the entire production in the 40-60s from scratch in China, and they did not help us, it was the West that helped China from the end of the 70s by investing about $ 20 trillion in their production, and not us, it was our collapse of the Union, organized by the top of the party elite and the West, and the rupture of all production chains (as well as actually a new civil war in the 90s and emigration) and not in China. What is the "level playing field" here? I am generally silent about the 10-fold numerical difference between our and the Chinese population.
                What was the "difference in raising the retirement age in Germany, the states, China and other Belarus", what are you writing about in general? What the fuck is the difference at what moment they raised it, if it was done all over the world before 2018, and in Russia only in 2019? And if we dug into one phrase said 15 years ago, let's remember any world and domestic politician in past and present history and easily find hundreds of phrases that these politicians did not keep, I assure Putin will be an order of magnitude higher morally than they are.
                And what has the Donbass to do with it, did he go to Ukraine? Wake up. And yes, the President primarily protects his citizens, and not citizens of other states (by the way, half a million Donetsk residents became citizens of the Russian Federation in six months). And why is it interesting that Stalin did not free from the Polish and European punishers from 1919 to 1939 half of my small homeland of Belarus and half of Ukraine? Why was this done only after random constraints of circumstances thanks to the famous Molotov-Ribentrop Pact? And if this incident did not exist, then would my father and his relatives from the Brest region be forcibly forced into Poles, or even rotted away and I and my children would not have been born at all? Why did the Soviet government drag out for so long, after all, extrapolating from those times and proportions, it had much more resources than Russia in the current geopolitical situation. It's just that, guys, there are your "noble impulses of souls", but there is world geopolitics, the art of the possible, this often does not coincide with your desires.
                Where is "gasoline getting more expensive"? Gasoline has been standing still for half a year now and the current events have not affected it at all (like other groups of goods, by the way).
                What "no money pensions"? Pensions are paid to everyone and indexed regularly, this is not the 90s with a $ 12 pension and that one has not been paid for six months.
                Data from the IMF, UN, World Bank, World Health Organization:
                Over 20 years, the GDP of the Russian Federation in terms of PPP has grown 6 times, the average salary in terms of PPP has grown 4,5 times, the number of private cars in Russians has grown almost 7 times, the volume of housing construction has grown 6 times annually (15 million sq m and 90 million sq m), infant mortality from 91 years old decreased from 20 per 1000 births to 4,6 per 1000 births (by the way, one of the lowest in the world, for comparison in the States 6,5 per 1000), the length of federal highways from 91 years ( RSFSR and RF) has grown from 39 thousand km to 81 thousand km, the length of paved roads since 91 (RSFSR and RF) has grown from 750 thousand km to 1 million km. All ports of the Union in 300 shipped only 91 million tons of products a year, and now only the ports of Russia (new and old) ship annually about 800 billion tons of products. The entire Union at the maximum per year collected 1 million tons of grain, now Russia alone collects from 124 to 120 million tons of grain per year. Throughout its history, both the Union and even more impoverished Russia in the 135s were a large importer of food, and now Russia is one of the world's largest exporters of food, since the 90th year (RSFSR and the Russian Federation) the production of poultry meat has grown 90 times, pork 3,5 times, we For a long time we have been a net exporter of these types of products and in our stores from Sakhalin to Kaliningrad you will not find non-domestic chicken, turkey and pork anywhere for 10 years. Everyone remembers the "Bush legs" of the 90s and the humanitarian aid of the late 80s, and now it is time to call "Putin's legs" after last year a number of large poultry companies in the Kursk region signed a contract with the Pentagon (don't be surprised) to supply chicken to the American army. Info on the network, you can easily find it. Russia is the world's largest exporter of wheat, vegetable oil, the world's 4th exporter of fish, self-sufficiency in beef is already about 85%, fish is over 90%, milk is about 94%, vegetables are 65%, but 10 years ago it was about 20%.
                Everyone remembers well the crisis of the Soviet nuclear industry in the 80s, Chernobyl and the early disasters of the 50-70s at Mayak, the submarine base in Kamchatka, etc. And now Rosatom State Corporation is a global leader, 68% (!!!) of new nuclear power plants under construction on the planet, 50% of the world uranium enrichment market, 60% of the RTG market (all space probes of any countries are powered by our nuclear batteries), the only company capable of building and building icebreakers , floating nuclear power plants, MOX fuel of a new technological paradigm and a closed nuclear cycle, the only company that develops nuclear propulsion systems, the world leader in the creation of high-power lasers, 5 of the four new transuranic elements of the periodic table are synthesized in Russia in Dubna, not in China, the states or somewhere else in Europe.
                Gold reserves in 99 were only $ 9 billion and zero gold and a public debt of about 150% of GDP, in the gold and foreign currency reserves of the Union in 91 there were less than 300 tons of gold and the crazy public debt was about $ 200 billion of those 1991 dollars, and now the gold and foreign currency of the Russian Federation is about $ 750 billion plus gold 2300, budget surplus for 15 consecutive years and almost zero public debt. Life expectancy from 99 years increased by 8,5 years from 65 to 73,5 years, the number of street children on the streets decreased from 2 million to zero, the number of orphans in Russian orphanages from 99 decreased from almost 600 thousand to 50 thousand, the annual number of abortions in the 90s it was from 2 to 4 million, and in 2019 only 550 thousand. I’m silent about the maternity capital of 600 thousand, there was no such gift either in Russia in the 90s or in the Union in any country in the world now and earlier. The Union with all its 15 republics and 290 million people built a maximum of 74 million square meters of housing in a year, and Russia has been building annually about 4 million square meters of housing over the past 90 years. Over the past 19 years, more new bridges have been built in Russia than half a century before (including the period of the RSFSR), data from the Association of Russian Builders. As far back as 99m, state property was about 20% of the Russian economy and now 75% of the country's economy, there is a gradual nationalization, the most Stalinist state capitalism, only without repression and you can easily stink on the couch, posing as a zarodnik and cursing the authorities))
                Under Putin, we liberated 85% of Syria by destroying 140 militants (7000 of them from the Russian Federation and the CIS) and driving America, Turks, NATO and their Middle Eastern satklilit out of most of the SAR, we returned Crimea, we drove out the Amers from Venezuela, we took half from the West World Arctic (with its oil and gas worth trillions of dollars), we are implementing the largest infrastructural, industrial and energy projects throughout Russia, we have created the most powerful Strategic Nuclear Forces on the planet and were the first in the world to deploy hypersonic weapons, Russia has regained the status of a superpower (without 14 fraternal republics and half of the Union’s resources measured, not from 290 but from 147 million people), we have become one of the leading geopolitical players. And all this we achieved without the Gulags, repressions, and multi-million dollar Komsomol construction projects, having actually gone through the 2nd civil war and terrorist attacks of the 90s, a massive outflow of the population in the 90s, and the looting of the 90s.
                1. +1
                  12 March 2020 19: 54
                  That's right, I also read SUN regularly, and therefore, as I wrote, thanks. For Crimea especially. But one does not need to think and convince oneself that there are no more worthy ones. They are, and his task is to adequately leave as the constitution interprets and leave behind a healthy political system.
                  Nobody forbids staying in politics and continuing to work for the good of the country. But this "zeroing out the terms" is already too much. IMHO.
                  1. +1
                    12 March 2020 20: 53
                    maxim947, you sculpt me cons? I don’t bet you, but oh well. Where are the worthy, name it, or the people in a large mass of 147 million do not know, we will discuss. And most importantly, the President is not appointed and elected, and with a multitude of international observers who are not at all friendly in each hole, therefore, the elections are more than an objective attitude of tens of millions of Russians to their leader (and it’s a sin to conceal to the world) leader. The next elections will be held and you, like me, like all citizens of the country, are free to vibrate any of the candidates. That's who the majority of the people will choose - that and the President, this is the main LAW. And yes, in the current pre-war electrified threatening planetary catastrophe, we will not deal with democratic snot, for this we are strengthening sovereignty, large-scale re-equipment of the Army, referendum on constitutional amendments, gradual nationalization of the economy and much more.
                    1. 0
                      12 March 2020 21: 11
                      At first a couple slapped, in my opinion, excessive idealism.
                      Elections, yes, democracy .. I can't help but remind you of a single "package" of amendments, is it your choice? I will vote in favor, but only because of the amendment abolishing the priority of international law.
                      And all the same people are worthy, just not athletes and widows should sit in the State Duma and the Federation Council appointed by party lists, deputies elected by regions.
                      Best regards hi
                2. -2
                  12 March 2020 21: 15
                  Sarmat Sanych, you (I write like you with a lowercase letter) are just as merry as a mossy pseudo-patriot who has no real fancy time for Putin.
                  China. Since 1979, China has embarked on a transition from a closed society to an open one, counting on the influx of foreign investment. The West helped China, and under the rule of the Communists. What does it mean helping? He invested money, as it was profitable. And who prevented us from doing all this? Equal conditions? Yes equal. China suppressed its freaks with tanks in a well-known area, and we went about it. Who is to blame for the fact that the stupid people themselves.
                  Retirement age. In the States, it has been announced over the years that there will be an increase in the retirement age. In Germany, too, everything was done humanly. There is a point system, look interesting yourself. They have a man receives an average pension of more than 1000 euros, a woman of more than 700. So you specifically pretend to or do not really understand the difference between our ruling freaks and theirs? I do not mind raising the pins. age. I am for this to be done humanly. It must be quietly done on World Cup day. Take it, tear your ass off the chair and tell people what and how. Or are you personally pleased that they are treated like cattle? But they do. And let everyone be on equal footing. Not enough money, let's sell these palaces of pins. funds. Or are you ready to endure this? Press your friends.
                  Everything, then there is simply no time and effort to disassemble everything. In principle, yes, everything is true. Only each line is demagogy. And the accident at the Mayak for some reason is attributed, and the Donbass like ... they didn’t put me in the ice hole and the people there, who believed in chatter, gold (for me, what?), Maternal capital is simply manna from heaven (in the USSR and without him more gave birth). In Syria, already three times all defeated and withdrawn troops, and it seems stuck there as in Afghanistan. As for the superpower, it’s also somehow slippery, 12th in GDP, Brazil is cooler than us. There are only 2 super powers - the USA and China. Everything else, your fantasies and unsupported desires. So this is your propaganda, comrade.
                  Seriously, I sincerely worry about my country. And if I don’t drool from tenderness at the sight of yourself knowing someone, this does not mean that I'm bad and I need to be blamed. I’m just firmly convinced that lying is not good and that nothing shines with this power, it exhausted itself about 5 years ago.
                  1. +2
                    12 March 2020 22: 47
                    edasko, all my data is confirmed by leading international sources, and again you whine and parrot. And here "China has suppressed and we have not" and what does this have to do with Putin? The fact that the leadership of the Union then made a catastrophic mistake and betrayal - no one argues, but what does this have to do with Putin? He then defended the interests of the Motherland in the GDR, questions to the then communists in power. I'm just saying what we went through and still achieved the highest level, and what China did not go through even by 1%. By the way, where were you during the 91st coup? Where are the 40 million members of the Communist Party of the USSR sitting at home? So what are you throwing at someone while sitting on the couch now? At the same time, do not forget that China "earned" thanks to its rapid development, and it earned the most dirtiest ecology on the planet, practically no forests, no uncontaminated rivers and lakes, fresh water left only for 30 years, the world's highest level of oncology (Chinese cancer villages knows the whole world), smog over cities does not leave almost 365 days a year, and much more. And would you work out all the last 70 years of Chinese development for 10-14 hours a day? Do you know that in China before the 90s, pensions were not paid at all and even now only 30% of the population are paid? The old man and the old woman do not have a working daughter-son plowing in some Shanghai and deducting 40% of their earnings to their parents - scatter in the trash. Better not write to me about China so as not to get into a puddle - my company has been sending business delegations of Russian builders to Beijing and Shanghai to various forums for almost a decade, so I know the Chinese "delights of life" better than anyone on the site, I assure you - after what you saw start praying for our lives. And how do you like the total absence of independent media in the PRC, electronic control, complete censorship in the net and many other surprises, after such emissions, you would have been sitting in the police station for a long time, and then a party card on the table, from the company is a party Chinese owner (there are all such) you on the next day turns with a wolf, then only a janitor.
                    By the way, China, with all its rapid development, has not yet reached 20% of the level of our most powerful Strategic Nuclear Potential on the planet, and if the Union did not help under Stalin, they would have it at the level of the current Sevkorea. Yes, and for conventional weapons, they still buy engines from us, they buy S-400s, they buy Su-35s, and what is most interesting is that they cannot copy normally even what they stole and bought from us in the 90s and what they stole in the West. Our old S-300 could not be reproduced properly, so the skies over Beijing are protected by the Russian S300 bought in the 90s plus our "Triumphs" now.
                    Why are you writing about the States, do you even know the life there? My sister, a cousin, a USA citizen since 2010, a suburb of LA, should I give her N so that she can tell you what is $ 600 or $ 1000 in America and that even a homeless person under a bridge cannot afford this money a month? In the course that there are 45 million beggars and homeless people in the United States, by the way, the UN data? And this is with their endless free printing press for tens of trillions of dollars, and Russia lives on its own money and even successfully resists the entire West, despite the most severe sanctions. You can go right now to Google and dial "online cameras" and any major city in the States, Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco, Chicago, etc. and see thousands of tents with homeless people right on the streets of cities, and in the suburbs there are not houses from Hollywood films, but trailers, moreover, rusty and tattered, near them there will be people cooking on fires. This is America. This zvizdyzh about the fact that "in the West, pensioners ride around the world" have already been denied hundreds of times, for example, in Germany, pensioners who can be classified as traveling - only 10%, by the way, the German state statistics. But social stores with cheap delays and tiny 40-square-meter box houses throughout Germany are growing like mushrooms.
                    And where is the comparison of Syria and Afgan, do you want to screw up completely?)) The union with the entire multimillion country and the most powerful army for the whole world disgraced itself in Afghanistan, laying 15 thousand lives, about 400 thousand wounded, ditching about 800 (in total) planes and helicopters there, after which, in the end, he left Afghanistan spat upon, and whoever fought were not needed even in late Soviet times. So I don’t even compare the effectiveness of the armies of this and that; for the sake of interest, I will compare the current ultra-modern Russian army with the seemingly "exceptional" army of Omerica:
                    US losses in Iraq (2003-2010): 24 aircraft, 137 helicopters, 530 Abrams, $ 2 trillion. In Afghanistan: 31 aircraft, 113 helicopters, $ 1,5 trillion. The total irretrievable loss of American helicopters in Afghanistan + Iraq is 568, while they fly only on holidays. The US casualties during the same period in Iraq: almost 4500 Pentagon military personnel and about 35 Amer’s PMC officers, wounded are not countable. In Afghanistan: more than 2400 Pentagon fatalities, about 25000 PMK officers, wounded darkness.
                    Russia in Syria over 5 years: 7 aircraft (2 did not land on Kuznetsov), 7 helicopters, 102 military. And now we control 85% of the SAR, the volume of Rosobornexport contracts has grown to $ 55 billion, and the Syrian campaign itself has invested in the small budget of the Moscow Region. And the Americans control only 5% of Afghanistan for fear of getting out of their bases, they expel the exceptional ones from Iraq with rags, all Iraqi deposits were long ago taken from American companies and given to the Russian, Chinese, French. and Indian. YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THEM AND OUR EFFICIENCY.
                    Further, what the hell is "12th place of the GDP", are you friends with your head? In comparison, the GDP of different countries is strictly applied to the PPP GDP, and Russia has $ 4,3 trillion, the 5th in the world, higher than, for example, Britain, Italy and France, plus we have practically zero public debt and gold reserves of $ 750 billion, and the above countries public debt of 100 percent or more of GDP, scanty gold and foreign exchange reserves, and even 80% of gross product consists of manipulations with stocks, print media and services. Only Russia has real GDP, well, India and China, of course.
                    And finally, about the dollar, what do you care about the dollar, why do you buy it for dollars?)) Food in Russia is 99% domestic, housing and communal services, medical services, transport and much more do not depend on the dollar exchange rate, and much from what depended earlier - now much less. About the price increase after crises, there is a lot of hype, take a look at the pro-Western RBC how prices have risen after the crises, thanks to import substitution, the increase every time was less and less: https://www.rbc.ru/business/10/03/2020/5e67945d9a79477b785d8772?from = from_main
                    There, at the end of the article, an increase, for example, for medical services in 99m was 35% and in 2018 4%, for transport in 99m 43% and in 2018 4%, for housing in 99m 32% and in 2018 3%, for gasoline 99m 301% and in 2018 9%, for products in 99m 36% and in 2018 4,7%, for building materials in 99m 46,6% and in 2018 4,9%.
                    Plus, after each crisis, the state’s share in the Russian economy increases, up to 98th it was 20%, until 2008 it was 35%, until 2014 it was about 50%, now it is 75%. Because in case of collapse of prices for shares of companies on European exchanges, the state buys them cheap from Western investors thanks to the huge gold reserves. And the dividends from these shares now go to the state budget and not over the hill.
                    1. -3
                      12 March 2020 23: 06
                      Listen, here on this "And finally about the dollar, what do you care about the dollar, why do you need it, what do you buy for dollars?" we can end our "conversation". Otherwise, I will completely lose faith in the adequacy of our people. I wish you all the best and bright ...
                      1. +3
                        12 March 2020 23: 23
                        Yes, you just have nothing to answer, one eternal nagging and no specifics, no suggestions. And most of the expenses we make for a month - food, electricity, transportation costs, housing and communal services, etc. - they are all domestic production, do not depend on the $ rate. Remember what Stalin said? Do not know - do not criticize, criticize - offer, offer - act and bear responsibility. Who do you propose, what kind of policy, let's discuss? Just a warning - I’ll post so many real facts to any of these common-minded, right-wing and liberal-non-system politicians that you don’t even choose him as the director of your housing office. Well, there is no political figure standing at least a speck of dust under the feet of Vladimir Vladimirovich, such is the reality. Moreover, that in the domestic politics, that in the international.
                3. -2
                  12 March 2020 21: 40
                  I almost forgot. "Where is the" gasoline getting more expensive "? Gasoline has been in place for half a year and the current events have not affected it at all (like other groups of goods, by the way)." Don't juggle. I wrote about the relationship between oil and gasoline prices. How will events affect prices? Wait until April 22nd. Right now, the central bank will dump the currency on the stock exchange, they will keep it at the level of 75. And after 22, when the rams vote for our everything, you will feel it in full. And you will have gasoline for 60, and a dollar for 90. Although they can again do some trick with their ears. Once again, the pension fund will be robbed, deposits may be frozen. After all, our people are new oil, they will figure out how to pump it out.
          2. +10
            12 March 2020 17: 40
            Quote: edasko
            This is just an old honored man

            should sit at home and watch TV or knit socks
    2. +28
      12 March 2020 13: 51
      Shame on the Communist Party! We must think of abstaining from voting on constitutional amendments! They had to either vote against or boycott the meeting of the State Duma. They abstained. Abstained Christmas tree sticks.
      1. +23
        12 March 2020 13: 53
        Quote: Sergey Olegovich
        Shame on the Communist Party!

        What can you do if we cannot find other communists ... These are our leftists.
        1. -3
          12 March 2020 14: 47
          Quote: Vladimir B.
          if we don’t find other communists ...

          There are no other communists laughing

          Tell us why should the Communists uphold the integrity of the current Constitution?
          1. -3
            12 March 2020 14: 49
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Shame on the Communist Party! We must think of abstaining from voting on constitutional amendments! They had to or vote against

            Do you plan to fight?
            For the inviolability of the constitution of Nemtsov you will lay bones? laughing
            1. +2
              12 March 2020 14: 54
              Do you plan to fight?
              For the inviolability of the constitution of Nemtsov you will lay bones?

              b - the struggle.

              Tell us why the communists should defend ...


              should not. do not stand apart. they are pseudo-communists who cannot do anything. They could not even take power in 1996, which suddenly almost turned up

              While there such as sternum, balabol Platoshkin and Zyuganov - this is not even a statist error. Imitation. Latent struggle.
          2. +17
            12 March 2020 15: 15
            Quote: For example
            Tell us

            What hangover did you see to it that the Communists uphold the bourgeois correction of the constitution written by the Americans? Communists, not those who call themselves Communists, urge the creation of a new constitution for the Russian Federation based on our historical experience. It is you who advocate the adoption of bourgeois amendments to the constitution written by the states.
            1. -4
              12 March 2020 15: 23
              chum your heard, gussky oppositionist, advocating universal gussky happiness
              1. +19
                12 March 2020 15: 27
                Oh, and here it is Petrov appeared. I did not expect to see you. Thank you for shining your face in front of my eyes. Does your forehead accidentally hurt? You strike the anti-people policies so hard that I feel sorry for the gender.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +17
                    12 March 2020 15: 39
                    Quote: s-t Petrov
                    take pity on yourself. sad oppositionist.

                    Petrov, petrov ... Are you from the generation of Komsomol merchants?
                    Quote: s-t Petrov
                    How does anyone take you to work?

                    They take it, and moreover with pleasure!
                2. +5
                  12 March 2020 16: 02
                  Quote: Arlen
                  Oh, and here it is Petrov appeared. ... Your forehead doesn’t hurt? You strike the anti-people policies so hard that I feel sorry for the gender.

                  No, he has trained, familiar!)))
      2. +8
        12 March 2020 14: 04
        Shame on the Communist Party!

        Those who are in the Duma are no longer communists. I won’t be surprised if they have a EdRa party card in their pocket.
        1. -4
          12 March 2020 16: 06
          You are mistaken. In the Duma, we have mainly former communists and Komsomol members. In all fractions. Although the former communists do not exist. This is our misfortune.
      3. -3
        12 March 2020 14: 53
        Oddly enough, but the glory of the Communist Party.
        You do not need to engage in Gaponism;
        Vote the Communist Party against, they would immediately be turned from cooler to matting, would be made enemies of the Russian people.
        As a result: a further weakening of the positions of the Communists in anticipation of the upcoming persecution of the people
        1. +8
          12 March 2020 15: 27
          Quote: U-58
          Vote the Communist Party against, they would immediately be turned from cooler to matting, would be made enemies of the Russian people.

          They would not be exposed as enemies, but put out of the Duma, and this is very disadvantageous and even painful.
        2. +9
          12 March 2020 15: 30
          Quote: U-58
          Oddly enough, but the glory of the Communist Party.
          You do not need to engage in Gaponism;
          Vote the Communist Party against, they would immediately be turned from cooler to matting, would be made enemies of the Russian people.
          As a result: a further weakening of the positions of the Communists in anticipation of the upcoming persecution of the people

          Awesome logic! Those. the opposition should support government initiatives so as not to lose access to the feeding trough. And nah ... why such an opposition ???
          1. -1
            12 March 2020 19: 12
            And what, supported?
            This Zhirinovsky all sorts of escapades and outrageous get away with it.
            But the Communists have spread rot and will spread rot.
            Have you forgotten a candidate from the Communist Party of the non-partisan Grudinin?
        3. +9
          12 March 2020 15: 41
          Quote: U-58
          Vote the Communist Party against, they would immediately be turned from cooler to matting, would be made enemies of the Russian people.

          Enemies of the Russian people are already visible .. Their actions are visible and it is not difficult to recognize them by their deeds. The Communists had to vote against. For those who decided to amend the Constitution, change it for themselves and the people of the new Constitution does not shine anything good .. The Communist Party unfortunately pocket opposition .. so the interests of the people do not defend ..
        4. +16
          12 March 2020 16: 15
          Quote: U-58
          would make enemies of the Russian people

          Don't you know that the Communists are being portrayed as enemies of the Russian people. Now, after abstaining from voting on amendments to the constitution, 10% of voters will not vote for the party. The voters, supporters of the Communist Party, will not forgive voting on the amendments. Zyuganov and Co., did everything to destroy the opinion of voters about the Communist Party and weaken the already weak positions of the communist movement. This is what you should have thought about first, and not accuse anyone of "gaponism".
      4. +18
        12 March 2020 15: 21
        Quote: Sergey Olegovich
        Shame of the Communist Party

        The Communist Party is not Zyuganov and the deputies from the party in the State Duma. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation is the millions of Russian citizens who vote for the party in the elections. And Zyuganov and other opportunists should be removed from the party and all the communist parties of Russia should be united into one. So it would be correct to say: "Shame on Zyuganov and the deputies who call themselves the great word communists."
        1. -3
          12 March 2020 16: 15
          Arlen, where did you see the Communists now and who are you proposing? Guys, stop talking garbage and utopian ideas.
          1. +15
            12 March 2020 16: 19
            Sergey, at the moment I do not offer anyone. I propose that all communist movements unite in one big party. Hold one big congress of all communist parties. Will it work out? More likely no than yes. But worth a try. As for utopian ideas ... Can I clarify which ones?
            1. -1
              12 March 2020 16: 28
              Utopian ideas that have sunk into oblivion in only 70 years, or more precisely after 29 years in 53. Hunting to step on the same rake? And all the "communist parties" in total won only a pitiful 13 per cent in the recent presidential elections, while the course of Vladimir Vladimirovich's Strong and Great Russia gained more than 76% of the popular support. This is an objective indicator, not a howl from the Internet. But we digress from the topic, who do you suggest? I will help with the "choice"laughing:
              Maybe he was infantile on the salary of Khodor Semin with the same scammers Boldyrev and Strawnikin?) I’m aware that Kostik received education and training in the United States, received American bonuses there, his wife, child, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son, and he the son of a former rather big official, then a deputy of the Sverdlovsk region, and even the head of a pro-Western fund? Plus, Victor Semin in 2011 was deputy chairman of the board of a large regional Rosbank, which he, along with the board of directors, successfully went bankrupt, withdrawing 11 billion more of those rubles at the rate of 25). It is easy to guess that the money went to the family.
              Who is there next, the creator of "Yabloko" Boldyrev, on which there is nowhere to put a hallmark? The fact that Yuri Yuryevich was in the early 90s one of the initiators of loans-for-shares auctions and one of the creators of the predatory "production sharing agreement" with the West is not even worth mentioning, and this is far from his main sin.
              Who else is there, Grudinin? A pathological liar, a cashier, a deceiver, a two-faced, a bigamist, sold Turkish strawberries under the guise of his, with a bunch of foreign accounts, hundreds of kg of gold (and officially) and property. Great Strawberry Houdini). Presenting an appraisal judgment of such garbage is the same as if a prostitute began to teach us morality.
              In the 90s, all the current pop-positioners were in business. Platoshkin in the staff of Midak Kozyrev traded in the interests of Russia. Grudinin and his fellows dragged into the hole everything that was not nailed to the floor by nails, and then sold thousands of hectares of "golden" Moscow land to various "Ashan", "Metro" and others with the oligarch Agalarov. Zyuganov and his comrades-in-arms in the Commercial Party of the Russian Federation adopted in the Duma of the 1st and 2nd convocations production sharing agreements and privatization lawmakers. The golden child Semin frolicked around the clubs in the States. Well, the oligarchs Nevzlin and Khodor, sponsoring them all, were dragging well fluid for tens of billions of dollars into their pockets. It is clear that they now have less space. I would like to return happy days.
              1. +14
                12 March 2020 16: 55
                Wow, how many have printed.
                Just a Jules Verne novel, not a comment.
                I ran a look at your comment ... You created a whole cocktail of everything and everyone. Piled in one pile and Grudinin, and Yavlinsky, and Nevzlin and others ...
                I don't even want to spoil such a "beauty" with my refutation. I even gave you a plus sign for your work on typing this commentary.
                1. +15
                  12 March 2020 16: 57
                  Quote: Arlen
                  and Yavlinsky

                  Wrong))). Not Yavlinsky, but Boldyrev.
                  1. -1
                    12 March 2020 17: 18
                    Boldyreva, that's right. The very garbage that was behind the laws on the separation of products, the one that was part of the Communist Party coalition to support Grudinin, the one that hangs out on the channels of the co-owned Semin, Kagarlitsky, Rudogo, etc., in short, the whole company that Khodor started financing before his release, and after serving continued: https://www.putin-today.ru/archives/94840
                    It is obvious to me alone that emocommies work for an uneducated, uneducated and low-skilled audience, playing on their envy, stupidity, inability to analyze facts, cause-and-effect relationships, and, for the most part, not in demand for these reasons? Apparently yes, it's easier to convince such people that everyone who lives better is not because they work day and night, but because they stole. That "we are in power here." And that the easiest way to live in abundance is to stage a coup, and then take everything and divide it up. The main thing is that they put pressure on greed and envy, the basest feelings of a loser. Immediately I remember about "European pensions and sn". Stupidity, but not smart people believe and are led.
                2. -1
                  12 March 2020 17: 09
                  Arlene, you can put a minus, do not worry so). I’ve put a minus for your empty comment, but you yourself understand that you are writing without meaning.
    3. +3
      12 March 2020 14: 00
      In the USSR, the worst thing for the working people was the "wishes of the working people".
      In particular: "at the request of the workers" the Soviet Union collapsed "...
      1. 0
        12 March 2020 14: 14
        watching "live" sessions ... where are they all? truancy? virus? but they will unanimously accept. yes, city but where are they all?
      2. -1
        12 March 2020 16: 30
        knn54, so it is, in principle
  2. +4
    12 March 2020 13: 40
    Yes, he will go to the polls, he will. There is even no doubt, unfortunately.
    1. +4
      12 March 2020 13: 47
      And he will win the election, since a large percentage of voters (citizens) support him.
      1. +8
        12 March 2020 15: 01
        And then! We have fools in store for hundreds of years.
    2. +18
      12 March 2020 13: 55
      Of course it will. If someone constantly asks him on behalf of the people, only now no one asks the opinion of the people.
      1. +6
        12 March 2020 13: 56
        If someone constantly asks him on behalf of the people

        Reminded: at the numerous requests of the working people ... dear Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev ... to present the Order of the Hero of Socialist Labor.
    3. +19
      12 March 2020 13: 56
      Something like this ...
      1. +2
        12 March 2020 14: 34
        Something like this ...
        Where do you find such drug addictions?) This law has already been adopted and has nothing to do with the Constitution. laughing
        1. +6
          12 March 2020 14: 47
          Quote: Prjanik
          has

          It has ! It even has, to raise the rating! soldier
          1. +3
            12 March 2020 14: 54
            It has ! It even has, to raise the rating! soldier
            Well, understand, sorry for interfering here in the wrestling idyll hi So it’s just funny, but then the picture caught on, could not resist. smile
        2. +8
          12 March 2020 15: 46
          Quote: Prjanik
          Something like this ...
          Where do you find such drug addictions?) This law has already been adopted and has nothing to do with the Constitution. laughing

          how it doesn’t, it still has it .. it’s necessary to cheer up the electorate .. and then raising the retirement age, VAT, taxes and other requisitions seriously ranks the ranks of those who are FOR .. here at least they try to throw some crumbs .. But the attempt must be said so-so .. much more serious is the next weakening of the ruble and as a result, after a couple of months, the people will become even poorer .. So they are in a hurry with the Constitution ..
          1. 0
            12 March 2020 15: 58
            how it doesn’t, it still has it .. it’s necessary to cheer up the electorate .. and then raising the retirement age, VAT, taxes and other requisitions seriously ranks the ranks of those who are FOR .. here at least they try to throw some crumbs .. But the attempt must be said so-so .. much more serious is the next weakening of the ruble and as a result, after a couple of months, the people will become even poorer .. So they are in a hurry with the Constitution ..
            Well, yes, yes, yes, because without this they won’t vote for amendments to the Constitution) It’s good that the comrades were invigorated, posted a picture, otherwise the electorate would not have known that such a law had been adopted)
        3. +8
          12 March 2020 17: 43
          Quote: Prjanik
          This law has already been adopted.

          after 20 years. How many thousands of children have starved over the years?
          1. +1
            12 March 2020 18: 00
            after 20 years. How many thousands of children have starved over the years?
            Apparently, they starved a lot and for a long time, before this law there was never free food for our students Yes
      2. -2
        12 March 2020 15: 54
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Something like this ...
        Your demotivator is very to the point, you can add that Medvedev did not give, as Boris liked to call in a helmet. So the Constitution and Medvedev, and now we’ll finally panic wassat
  3. +6
    12 March 2020 13: 43
    Last time I went to the polls in 1996.
    After there was no desire.
    I’ll go to the constitutional vote.
    Does it make sense or not, I’ll go all one.
    It is clear that the problems of citizens do not care about our power from the word at all.
    But they got it already specifically.
    1. +6
      12 March 2020 13: 48
      Unfortunately, the farther the worse and the dumber. Our government behaves very clumsy. I’m looking and thinking correctly that the young people are leaving, who can and should not be condemned, not who does not want to live in this madhouse for decades. I hope my children will be able to leave me too late.
      1. +22
        12 March 2020 13: 59
        I hope my son will stay in Russia, only because this is our home. Who needs us abroad.
        1. -1
          12 March 2020 14: 33
          Sometimes it's better on the street than at home when you have "great living conditions" at home
          1. +16
            12 March 2020 14: 45
            I agree, but maybe we are to blame for this? We do nothing to ensure that we are not satisfied with "excellent living conditions". We ourselves have allowed this to be treated.
            1. +3
              12 March 2020 14: 51
              I agree absolutely! But what can I do !? Those who tried to sit and will sit. Our people with their lack of will and fear deserve it. My conscience is clear, I never voted for these "galley slaves". Only to leave, but I’m not stupid where, and not at all. Just despondency from the realization that there is nothing you can change
              1. +14
                12 March 2020 15: 00
                Quote: bondrostov
                But what can I do

                Alone, we can do nothing. Our strength is in unity. Only together we will be able to win. But there is one thing. This is but most of all achieves. The opposition has no leader. This is our weakness.
                1. +2
                  12 March 2020 15: 03
                  It is no longer possible to change this situation by means of elections. The people have not yet "matured" to other methods, and it is not a fact that they will.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. +6
                      12 March 2020 15: 16
                      A blogger like you abroad calls us Russische Schweine. Thank God there are not many of you
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                      6. +5
                        12 March 2020 15: 33
                        I told you, I’m an old evil TsRUshnik sitting in the Pentagon and thinking how to ruin Peter’s life and not let him and his great leader get off his knees!
      2. +2
        12 March 2020 14: 57
        What is clumsy ?.
        Everything is very elegant.
        We recruit almost easy 76% ....
    2. +3
      12 March 2020 13: 53
      Quote: Livonetc
      Last time I went to the polls in 1996.

      Who voted for then, if not secret?
      Quote: Livonetc
      But they got already exactly

      Wrong word, indignation goes off scale. As one character said, "the hand reaches for the gun."
      1. +10
        12 March 2020 13: 58
        Then for Yavlinsky.
        The choice of an intellectual. winked
        Now I would not vote for this person under any circumstances.
        hi
        1. +4
          12 March 2020 14: 03
          Yeah, great then people fooled promises.
          Quote: Livonetc
          Now I would not vote for this person under any circumstances.

          Everyone can be mistaken. But not everyone can admit their mistake hi
        2. The comment was deleted.
  4. -12
    12 March 2020 13: 48
    At least one reasonable article on this topic. Tired of the constant whining of "all the scarecrows". And with or without it. It will go. will not go - the howling of such creatures will have little effect on Putin. If it is in demand, it will, no ... But no, and there is no trial (now) ...
    1. -3
      12 March 2020 15: 03
      And if it is not in demand, but it will go anyway?
  5. -4
    12 March 2020 13: 49
    Why is Putin bad? At the moment and in the near future there is no alternative to him.
    1. +5
      12 March 2020 14: 03
      Bgggg ..))
      This, after it is buried under the Kremlin wall (and sooner or later it will happen) - will we all die ?? From no alternative ..))
      1. +1
        12 March 2020 14: 38
        Something inspired.
        From a sword or from a slow old age, Aragorn will die. And you will not find comfort. Nothing diminishes the pain of this loss. He will meet death, embodying the greatness of the king of people, crowned with glory that will not fade until the last day of the existence of the world.
    2. 0
      12 March 2020 14: 55
      Quote: ZoomLion
      at the moment and in the near future there is no alternative to it.

      but I began to like Markhaev
  6. -6
    12 March 2020 13: 51
    Yes, let him rule at least until 2045 !!! He deserved it. Without him, the people of Khan will be.
  7. +2
    12 March 2020 13: 54
    Russia passed the presidency of Medvedev when Putin’s position has not become weaker at all. At that time, Putin was the most influential politician in Russia. This is likely to continue.

    Lord "Sohu" issty! We ourselves do not know Putin’s position, for he has never taken part in pre-election debates, and on regular “direct lines” he constantly deftly answers questions posed to him by himself, and gives direct answers to questions like these:

    The real leader of the country did not have to call the President of the USA and the Prime Minister of GB to Yalta for a long time. And here on the 75th anniversary of the Victory the faces are turned away ... Perhaps this is such a way of respect for an influential politician, for the country he leads ...
    "This is likely to continue ..."
    1. +7
      12 March 2020 14: 03
      Quote: ROSS 42
      The real leader of the country did not have to call the President of the USA and the Prime Minister of GB to Yalta for a long time. And here on the 75th anniversary of the Victory the faces are turned away ..

      If my memory serves me in Yalta, these people arrived in order to divide Europe. At the Victory Parade, at the very first and most important, these people were not.
      1. +4
        12 March 2020 14: 09
        Quote: Less
        If I remember correctly in Yalta, these people, in order to divide Europe.

        About.
        1. The Polish Question
        2. Spheres of influence in Europe
        3. Occupation zones in Germany
        4. Reparations
        5. The end of the war with Japan
        6. UN

        Roosevelt had rested by the time of the Parade; they had no time for the parades.
        1. +2
          12 March 2020 14: 20
          Quote: ROSS 42
          Roosevelt rested by the time of the Parade,

          Churchill was alive. Instead of Roosevelt was Truman. They were not at the parade.
          Quote: ROSS 42
          they were not up to the parades.

          But can there be other worries besides the parade?
          You perfectly understood that I pointed out to you a frank juggling.
          1. -6
            12 March 2020 14: 32
            Quote: Less
            I pointed out to you a frank juggling

            Grandfather is old, he doesn’t care (s).
    2. +3
      12 March 2020 15: 06
      On the "straight lines" (well, at least the first), he generally stated quite sound thoughts. That's just the implementation, either none, or exactly the opposite.
  8. +12
    12 March 2020 14: 04
    Putin does not want to weaken the existing power vertical ....
    No matter what position Putin occupies in the current executive after 2024, he will still be considered the center of power

    Just thoughtfully read what is written.
    He built an interesting vertical. When all control beams converge at one point, apex. Moreover, this peak is not the President of the Russian Federation, as it would be logical. And personally GDP.
    Well, it is written, and many agree with this.
    And if you remove the GDP from this vertical, everything will collapse like a house of cards?
    What kind of Russia does he want to leave behind?
    1. +5
      12 March 2020 14: 33
      judging by what is happening, for example, in science and education, he has no long-term plans for the development of the country, from the word completely, after us at least a flood ...
    2. +5
      12 March 2020 15: 36
      Quote: kit88
      What kind of Russia does he want to leave behind?

      Judging by his actions, he does not give a damn about the fate of the country that awaits us after his death.
  9. +1
    12 March 2020 14: 07
    In general, the Chinese wrote everything correctly. We can guess here until the second coming. And he will do as it will be necessary at the moment (when this moment comes).
  10. +2
    12 March 2020 14: 15
    NO! NO AND NO AGAIN!
    I personally support Platoshkin’s idea ... Putin’s direct debate live, for example with the same Platoshkin.
    Personally, I want to see, hear, and then make a conclusion.
    I would also like to see Putin in debates with other people, but not marianettes from the presidential administration.

    I began to fight, I began to explain to people, I will do it, I will continue ...
    I want to see a shadow government with their program.
    I want to see Platoshkin in the presidents.
    It's my personal opinion.
    I want a change for every person in our country for the better.

    I am against the journalistic leader in Roskosmos.
    I am opposed to the head sociologist in the Ministry of Industry.
    I am against the Minister of Education who did not work at school for a day.
    I am against the Minister of Culture, let it go nafig.
    I am against the Minister of Health who allows a video asking for treatment of children on TV.
    I am against all the current government today.
    And I have the right to it!

    Ps
    I am for an honest investigation on the stool! And won it from helicopter engineering!
    1. +1
      12 March 2020 15: 08
      "Direct debates of Putin on the air, for example with the same Platoshkin."
      ))) This is not a royal matter.
    2. 0
      12 March 2020 15: 42
      Another warrior That, comrade, you have excessive egocentrism, too many "I", somehow not in a socialist way, the right word. I do not argue that debates are necessary, and, moreover, without fail. On other points - in principle, too. Especially about "feldmebel".
  11. 0
    12 March 2020 14: 25
    Yes, this position in the list proposed, generally pf-e ... can also wrap up the court, constitutional.
    Although, for all creators, defining, steering and commanding, this is clearly preferable ....
    Here is what those who are not ours anyway, so can remain indefinitely with their babosiks and other "buns", household members. behind the hillock all this muddiness means as complete ZERO !!!
    Everything, more NE INTERESNO!
  12. 0
    12 March 2020 14: 27
    Come on, little peasants!
    Relaxed here! We are talking!
    Today, talkers, and tomorrow, why good, start to think ?!
    You yourself know what it is, but to think and decide - it will somehow sort of figure out without you who needs it!
  13. +4
    12 March 2020 14: 47
    I don’t remember who said that the tragedy of Pushkin “Boris Godunov” in Russia can be read like a newspaper.
    How will it end? Learn is not surprising:
    The people will still howl and cry
    Boris frowns a little more
    What a drunkard before a glass of wine
    And finally, by her grace
    Accept the crown humbly agree;
    And there - and there he will rule us
    Still.
  14. -1
    12 March 2020 14: 49
    Somehow I listened to one analyst on TV, so he gave answers to the most
    confusing questions in the style of an arithmometer. When they objected, they say
    here it will be like our concession, he answered - it doesn’t matter to me - for me
    two criteria - a decision is productive or counterproductive.
    I will try, first against, then for, so:
    the fact that the system is tailored for one person is definitely badly counter-productive,
    the fact that there is no change of power (responsibility decreases) is counterproductive,
    the fact that the system did not grow a successor (or maybe does not want to) is counterproductive,
    the belt of benevolence towards Russia, both near and far, is already all counter-productive,
    to vote for the one who failed all their obligations is counterproductive.
    I think that's enough - it means we go and vote "productively".
    Pros: so Hurray - IT IS IMPOSSIBLE! We choose ....... and from whom? (remember what country we have!)
    Okay, we’ve passed (chosen) - and THIS is in the Duma, and there Tereshkova, Govorukhin,
    shorter than AZLK 2141 (well, KAMAZ) - is that in 2020 then? when they have Tesla, Dragon,
    We get the conflict. And you think he’ll have it with parliament like May, like Trump,
    how is natanyahu? And not afraid for the White House? I would advise, just in case, the whole
    firearm (up to the starting) in Moscow and its environs to seal. Leave only
    checkers - let them fight, if anything, fearless.
    Further ministers, further governors - as we think, will figure it out?
    Well, what do we demand from him? Immediately! Well, for example - immediately finish it
    slobbery - Crimea, Novorossiya - Kiev to take the whole question. After Kiev Minsk - him and
    you don’t have to take it - the Duma sat down and decided Russia is Great, White and Small together,
    it has been so for centuries and it should be so. Well, there’s still one who wants to wash boots in Indian
    the ocean. In general, there are many of us and all are different and you will not list?
    So what do we do — productive or counterproductive?
    1. +3
      12 March 2020 15: 45
      Kushka (Anatoly), before embarking on New Russia, Kiev and other settlements, I think that the order should be established at home.
      1. 0
        12 March 2020 16: 12
        You are right (and you understood that I deliberately exaggerated, or, as it is here, at the level of delirium)
        But to think (order to establish, as you say) in a country in which oceans how many ?,
        how many seas ?, how many nations? enemies (and where without them) how many? etc. - here is the head
        need it. So the EBN (such a penny) he managed to prepare a successor and transfer power
        clean (no one even opened his nose to anyone). And tell me you didn’t guess?
        And this one, as you think - could not prepare, or didn’t want to? Here in this question and
        answer. And further Tereshkova and further in the text.
        1. +1
          12 March 2020 16: 16
          Kushka (Anatoly), my opinion is this: regardless of who will be at the head of the regime, the system itself needs to be redone. With a bias in socialism. To sow, so to speak, rational, kind, eternal ... We have already passed this, people, in the sense, I didn’t personally, because I was born under EBN (what are his good initials).
  15. -6
    12 March 2020 14: 52
    As an option.
    Over the next 4 years, Putin is preparing a successor, which he puts on the farm, leaving for the State Council himself.
    The State Council controls the actions of the successor president.
    This is what the last (before the proposal of the conditional Tereshkova) changes to the Constitution were about.
    Further, for example, the successor is assimilated, crawls out of the shadow of the state council and begins to pursue its own policy.
    In principle, this was the case with Putin himself, who, having acquired a new position, got out of the oligarchs and began to steer independently, and those oligarchs who did not come to terms with this know where.
    So, this very "zeroing" can serve for the successor simply as a deterrent, according to which the same State Council can call early elections and that very Putin rushes in on a dashing horse. Therefore, it will be more difficult for the heir to twitch.
    And if the successor continues to pursue the interests of the "family", then this point will remain unclaimed.

    Well this is so, in the order of delirium.
    1. -2
      12 March 2020 15: 39
      This is not nonsense. In any case: whether the Constitutional Court agrees or disagrees with "zeroing", in any case the Brigadier will be "at the top". Either as the Virgin President or as Chairman of the State Council, as in China. Long live the monarchy! Now only the question of succession to the throne remains ...
    2. +1
      12 March 2020 16: 09
      Quote: Mishka78
      So, this very "zeroing" can serve for the successor simply as a deterrent, according to which the same State Council can call early elections and that very Putin rushes in on a dashing horse. Therefore, it will be more difficult for the heir to twitch.
      Somewhere I already saw it .... lol
  16. -1
    12 March 2020 15: 32
    How it goes !!! Will not work, so kicks "shove". Both right and left ...
  17. +3
    12 March 2020 15: 35
    Let it fail. I sat up.
  18. -5
    12 March 2020 15: 49
    Daddy with his son "climbs" everywhere. Who will the Brigadier transfer the throne to in 2036? Bastard from Kabaeva (evaluative opinion)?
  19. +1
    12 March 2020 15: 53
    Quote: Pavel Amarok
    Another warrior That, comrade, you have excessive egocentrism, too many "I", somehow not in a socialist way, the right word. I do not argue that debates are necessary, and, moreover, without fail. On other points - in principle, too. Especially about "feldmebel".


    "I" in the sense, and I indicated that this is my personal opinion.
  20. +1
    12 March 2020 16: 02
    Quote: Mishka78
    As an option.
    Over the next 4 years, Putin is preparing a successor, which he puts on the farm, leaving for the State Council himself.
    The State Council controls the actions of the successor president.
    This is what the last (before the proposal of the conditional Tereshkova) changes to the Constitution were about.
    Further, for example, the successor is assimilated, crawls out of the shadow of the state council and begins to pursue its own policy.
    In principle, this was the case with Putin himself, who, having acquired a new position, got out of the oligarchs and began to steer independently, and those oligarchs who did not come to terms with this know where.
    So, this very "zeroing" can serve for the successor simply as a deterrent, according to which the same State Council can call early elections and that very Putin rushes in on a dashing horse. Therefore, it will be more difficult for the heir to twitch.
    And if the successor continues to pursue the interests of the "family", then this point will remain unclaimed.

    Well this is so, in the order of delirium.


    Quite right, I will add that the Federation Council is our own - Matvienko and co, the Security Council headed by sidekick Medvedev, the State Council with elected cronies and "our" backbone, just in case, and it turns out in all respects a good position and defense, from the legal aspect to an accidental "puncture. "if something goes wrong. Everywhere its own and with a cash flow, as it was before, only you can also increase taxes, fees, etc. the future president does not matter, and all the "discontent" of the people can be written off by changing to another controlled figure. Everything is allowed. Up to bloody massacres against crowds of disaffected. And then also with tears to scold.
    Darkness!
    1. -1
      12 March 2020 16: 19
      But there are just people. And not only the watchman with the saleswomen in the markets, which the owners replace like gloves. There are also market owners who have a headache due to the ruble collapse adventure. There are young people who are not able to dump overseas and rely on 20 million high-tech jobs. It’s already useless ... And everyone has already formed a certain opinion, which does not fit in any way with the speeches of Tereshkova and the applause of the deputies.
  21. -1
    13 March 2020 06: 48
    I am glad that GDP will again become President!