Sohu: It’s not an indisputable fact that Putin’s readiness to go to the elections of 2024

Sohu: It’s not an indisputable fact that Putin’s readiness to go to the elections of 2024

РќР ° стрР° РЅРёС † Р ° С ... китР° Р№СЃРєРѕРіРѕ медиР° ресурсР° Sohu РѕРїСѓР ± Р » РЅ РїРѕР »РёС‚РёС ‡ еским СЃРѕР ± С‹ тиям РІ Р РѕСЃСЃРёРё. Автор СЂР ° СЃСЃРєР ° Р · С ‹РІР ° ет С З РёС‚Р ° телям Рѕ том, С З С‚Рѕ РИ РсСЃСЃРёРё РІР ° СЂР» С ‹РІРѕРїСЂР ° РІРєРё РІ РљРѕРЅСЃС‚РёС‚СѓС † РёСЋ, РІРѕ котѾры Рј состоится РІСЃРЂРРРРРРРРРПРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРПРРРРРРРРРПРРРРРРРРРРРРРПРРРРРРРРРРПР RћRґRЅR ° Röhr SЃRѕRїSѓS,SЃS,RІSѓSЋS · ‰ ... Roes S,RμRј, RєRѕS,RѕSЂR ° SЏ RїRѕRґRЅSЏS,R ° PI Sohu, â € "RІRѕR · RјRѕR¶RЅRѕSЃS,SЊ RґR" SЏ P'P "P ° ° RґRoRјRoSЂR RџSѓS, РёРЅР ° РЅР ° С ‡ Р ° ть СЃ РЅСѓР »СЏ РѕС‚СЃС З С'С‚ преР· РёРґРµРЅС‚СЃРєРёС ... СЃСЂРѕРєРѕРІ.


From the material:

Р РССЃСЃРёР№СЃРєРёР№ РїР ° СЂР »Р ° мент С „Р ° РєС‚РёС ‡ ески СЂР ° Р · СЂРµС € Р ° ет Р'Р »Р ° РґРёРјРёРЂСРѓСРѓР ° С ±Р ° С ±Р ° С ±С °Р ° С С‚СЊ Р ± еР· РѕРіСЂР ° РЅРёС ‡ ений. RџSЂRo RЅS <RЅRμS € RЅRμRј SЂRμR№S,RoRЅRіRμ RїSЂRμR · RoRґRμRЅS,R ° F RѕSЃSЃRoRo RІRμR "RoRєR RІRμSЂRѕSЏS,RЅRѕSЃS,SЊ S,RѕRіRѕ ° C ‡ S,Rѕ SЂRѕSЃSЃRoSЏRЅRμ SЃ RіRѕS,RѕRІRЅRѕSЃS,SЊSЋ RїSЂRoRјSѓS, S,R ° РєРѕРµ РЅРѕРІС € ество. RљR R¶RμS,SЃSЏ ° C ‡ S,Rѕ SЂRѕSЃSЃRoSЏRЅRμ RІSЂRμRјRμRЅRЅRѕ P · ° F ± F C <F "of the PS Ryo RїR ° RґRμRЅRoRo RєSѓSЂSЃR SЂSѓR ° ± P" SЏ Ryo RґSЂSѓRіRoS SЌRєRѕRЅRѕRјRoS ‡ ... ... RμSЃRєRoS RїSЂRѕR ± P "RμRјR ° FROM…. R еР° Р »РёР · уемы Р№ РІР »Р ° РЅ поможет укрепить вертикР° Р »СЊ РІР» Р ° сти РІ РёРЃС.

R ”R ° R» RµRµ RєРёС‚Р ° Р№СЃРєРёР№ R ° втор предлР° РіР ° ет РІСЃС 'же РЅРµ СЃРїРµС € ить СЃ РІС ‹РІРґ РћС‚РјРµС З РµРЅРѕ, С З С‚Рѕ РЅРµ СЏРІР »СЏРµС‚СЃСЏ неосворимы Рј С РѕСЂС ‹2024 РіРѕРґР °.

From the material:

Рђ С ‡ то если Путин РЅРµ РїР» Р ° РЅРёСЂСѓРµС ‚остР° ться -“ кто его СЃРјРµРЅРёС ‚? Путин РѕС З З РµРЅСЊ умело дерС'тся, РїСЂРё этом РІ его R · РґСЂР ° РІРѕРјРІР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р Р РЅРµ СЃС‚РѕРёС ‚РЅРµРґРѕРѕС † енивР° ть тР° РєРѕРіРѕ Р» идерР°.

Автор РїРёС € РµС ‚, С З С‚Рѕ Путин РЅРµ С… РѕС З З РµС‚ РѕСЃР »Р ° Р ± R» ять СЃСѓС ‰ РµСЃС‚РІСѓСЋС ‰РѓРѓРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋРЋ Р ° сти, РєР ° Рє это Р ± С ‹Р» Рѕ РїСЂРё РЅРµРєРѕС‚РѕСЂС ‹С ... его РїСЂРµРґС € ественникР° С ....

From the article:

НеР· Р ° РІРёСЃРёРјРѕ РѕС ‚того, РєР ° РєСѓСЋ РґРѕР» жность Путин Р · Р ° ймеинннЌЌЌЌЌЌЌЌЌЁЌЌЌЌЌЌЁЌЌЌЌЁЌЌЌЌЌйЌЌЌйЌЌйЌР° SЃS,Ro RїRѕSЃR "Rμ 2024 RіRѕRґR °, RѕRЅ RІSЃRμ SЂR RІRЅRѕ ° F ± SѓRґRμS, SЃS ‡ RoS,R S,SЊSЃSЏ ° C RμRЅS,SЂRѕRј RІR †" ° F SЃS,Ro, RїRѕ RєSЂR ° R№RЅRμR№ RјRμSЂRμ СЂР ° РІРЅС ‹Рј, РґР ° же РїРѕРґР ° РІР» СЏСЋС ‰ РёРј. Р РССЃСЃРёСЏ РїСЂРѕС € Р »Р ° преР· идентство МедведеРИР °, РєРѕРіРґР ° РІРѕР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р ° Р 'то время Путин Р ± С ‹Р» СЃР ° РјС ‹Рј РІР» иятельны Рј РїРѕР »РёС‚РёРєРѕРј Р РѕСЃСЃРёРё. RS‚Рѕ, вероятно, РїСЂРѕРґРѕР »Р¶РёС‚СЃСЏ. Р • СЃР »Рё ему СѓРґР ° стся СЃРїСЂР ° виться СЃ современнСРСРСРЀааааааааааР° Ѕ РЅС ‹Рј РїРѕР» итиком, Рё ему РґР »СЏ этого РґР ° же РЅРµ нужно Р · Р ° РЅРёРјР ° ЂиииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииР° Р »СЊРЅС‹ Рµ РґРѕР »Р¶РЅРѕСЃС‚Рё.

R 'Sohu РѕС‚РјРµС З Р ° ется Р ° вторитР° СЂРЅС ‹Р№ С ... Р ° СЂР ° ктер действуЎР·РРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРР RїSЂRo SЌS,RѕRј SЃRѕRѕR C ± ‰ P RμS,SЃSЏ ° C ‡ S,Rѕ RѕRЅ In "RґR" SЏ SЃRμR ± SЏ RѕS RμSЂS,RoR ‡ "· RєSЂSѓRі RІRѕR RјRѕR¶RЅS <C ... PI RїSЂRμRμRјRЅRoRєRѕRІ 3-5 C ‡ еловек».
Photos used:
Russian President's website
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

128 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Cut Samshitov 12 March 2020 13: 39 New
    • 35
    • 24
    +11
    Did Tereshkova write an article to the Chinese?
    1. maxim947 12 March 2020 13: 43 New
      • 30
      • 19
      +11
      If this is not an indisputable fact, why then do it now, and the meanness is that everything is included in the “single package”? Why not leave the following leaders to the conscience? And the attention is drawn to the "politicians" who came up with this initiative Tereshkova and Valuev. The most unpleasant thing is that ordinary people are kept for idiots by inhaling this nonsense.
      It’s hard in Russia to part with power.
      1. Cut Samshitov 12 March 2020 13: 48 New
        • 22
        • 16
        +6
        And the attention is drawn to the "politicians" who came up with this initiative Tereshkova and Valuev.
        These figures are not for a career. They are for bread, but with black caviar ...
        1. Stas157 12 March 2020 13: 51 New
          • 28
          • 16
          +12
          The Russian parliament actually allows Vladimir Putin to work without Borders.

          The Russian parliament cannot ban Putin. It is actually a useless, but very expensive tool. Its main role is to show the appearance of a democratic separation of powers.

          Russians are willing to accept such an innovation. It seems that the Russians have temporarily forgotten about the depreciation of the ruble and other economic problems.

          The more they beat, the more they love.
          1. Vladimir B. 12 March 2020 13: 59 New
            • 22
            • 9
            +13
            Quote: Stas157
            Its main role is to show the appearance of a democratic separation of powers.

            But as they show their rapid activity laughing
            Quote: Stas157
            The more they beat, the more they love.

            However, beating means love. wink
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. Honest Citizen 12 March 2020 14: 57 New
              • 19
              • 7
              +12
              Let's vote on the amendments not as a package, but for each item separately!
              I am sure that many will be held, but you do not want to vote separately, you need in bulk.
              And by the way, I look forward to publishing the full list of amendments that they want to include in the Constitution.
              And then maybe we shouldn’t break the spears here?
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. Honest Citizen 12 March 2020 15: 02 New
                  • 7
                  • 7
                  0
                  in the invented money-box you can vote absolutely any way, I think.

                  Those. Are you for the batch vote, I understand correctly?
                  1. St Petrov 12 March 2020 15: 05 New
                    • 13
                    • 12
                    +1
                    yes, but I would expand the package by banning property ownership abroad for officials

                    1. Honest Citizen 12 March 2020 15: 08 New
                      • 12
                      • 7
                      +5
                      I would also increase the number of amendments. I do not argue.
                      But to vote in a package - is it not a departure from the principles of democracy? So to say, political manipulation? Do not find? laughing
                    2. Overlock 12 March 2020 17: 39 New
                      • 9
                      • 0
                      +9
                      Quote: c-Petrov
                      but I would still expand the package by banning property ownership abroad for officials

                      and Putin is against!
              2. Golovan Jack 12 March 2020 15: 32 New
                • 7
                • 12
                -5
                Quote: Honest Citizen
                By the way, I’m waiting for the full list of amendments to be included in the Constitution to be published.

                Are you banned on the Internet? Find Amendment Bill - Lom?
                1. Honest Citizen 12 March 2020 15: 36 New
                  • 6
                  • 4
                  +2
                  Are you banned on the Internet? Find Amendment Bill - Lom?

                  The State Duma, the Council of the Federation and the Legislative Assembly of the regions will vote for the bill on constitutional amendments for the week. And the president will sign the document on March 18 - on the day of the annexation of Crimea to Russia, RBC found out

                  Read more at RBC:
                  https://www.rbc.ru/politics/04/03/2020/5e5e5d7e9a79472a06eb61ad
            2. unaha 12 March 2020 14: 59 New
              • 9
              • 3
              +6
              Yes, who would doubt - if someone against the godfather says something, then they are exclusively enemies of the people. By the way, why else didn’t the turnover return to the codes?
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. unaha 12 March 2020 15: 40 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  Common sense is an objective thing. But I understand that it is from the wrong sources - it does not count.
                  By the way, the US democrats agree with you in this situation, if the information about the fraud against Sanders comes from the "Russian hackers", then it seems to be true, but it doesn’t count. )))
            3. Stas157 12 March 2020 15: 43 New
              • 13
              • 7
              +6
              Quote: c-Petrov
              pseudo-communists merged in one choir and liberda

              And here is the representative of that love "tougher" - an imperious adorer, a messenger Petrov. Those who do not share his masochistic predilections, he stops with an angry cry. And urges everyone not to whine)))
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 16: 05 New
        • 5
        • 9
        -4
        And let’s (so that some people finally get burned out) we’ll talk about the change of power, but not in Russia, where some of this song has already erased all its languages, but in the United States (so far).
        I love historical parallels. They are so parallel ...
        So, for a long time (more than one hundred and fifty years, for a minute) in the USA there were no restrictions on the number of terms for which the president can be elected. As long as people are satisfied, people continue to choose - let them rule.
        Everything changed during the Roosevelt presidency. It ruled for four terms - and not only successfully brought the country out of the Great Depression, but also made the United States one of the winners in World War II, which allowed the United States (which previously held openly secondary positions in world politics) to actually become a superpower and world hegemon.
        Roosevelt was not forgiven for success.
        A strong president was too strong. Strengthened by the state, which could not please corporations. And so it was bankers and corporations who lobbied for the amendment about “no more than two terms.”
        So it turns out that the “change of power” is needed where there are some shadow oligarchic elites who want to control the government and prevent the strengthening of the state. Where is that notorious Deep State, the deepest state.
        As the oligarchic sponsor of the mayor of Chicago in the TV series “The Boss” said, “We need such changes so that nothing changes.”
        In the USA, as we see, there is a change of power, because almost nothing depends on the president there. After all, real power is concentrated in the hands of the Fed and Wall Street (among bankers and the military-industrial complex).
        Very clearly: both Obama and Trump came to power with the slogans of ending the wars and the return of American soldiers home. But neither one nor the other managed to do this. Obama was forced to start two more new wars, Trump was on the verge of the same several times (and with Syria, and with North Korea, and with Iran).
        With a weak presidential power, a strong parliamentary one is obtained. And the parliament is formed by party sponsors.
        Again it is extremely clear: for ten years in the American Congress, despite regular elections, exactly 1 (in words: ONE) deputy has been replaced. And then, in view of the death of the previous one. All the other faces remained the same. At the arena all the same.
        And what real change of power are they talking about after that?
        Hired managers are changing, and puppeteers remain unchanged. Like in the UK, where the prime ministers change regularly, and the queen and members of the House of Lords are not elected and rule by inheritance.
        Screen, visibility, fiction, illusion - choose any term you like (we have democracy and freedom of choice, hehe). Because any of them is true.
        No change of power exists in nature (read Mark Twain, he is immortal). ANYWHERE. If the power changes (or rides a bicycle there and / or moves without bodyguards) - it means that nothing really depends on this “power”.
        Therefore, citizens, stop being led on illusions.
        1. unaha 12 March 2020 16: 25 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          There it is! I thought that a powerful economy, a favorable position in the war, the absence of significant losses, rational management provided the opportunity "to actually become a superpower and a world hegemon." And this one is Roosevelt ...
          But in general, what's wrong? Presidents and parties are changing (awl on soap, yes))). COURSE remains. And this course is within the framework of the current 150 years of the constitution.
          “Trump was on the verge of the same thing several times (with Syria, and with North Korea, and Iran)” - exactly so, but the independence of the branches of government DOES NOT allow him to make such decisions in one.
          1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 16: 39 New
            • 5
            • 7
            -2
            unaha, I was horrified to understand that most commentators generally do not bother with the understanding of the text they are commenting on, and even more so, they do not try to consciously watch a fragment of a video. Pure reflection, not obscured by the work of the mind. Clip thinking in full growth. Many, in principle, do not even try to understand the difference between their personal perceptions (of their relatives, friends, acquaintances) and the statistics of the whole state, in which 147 million people live, on a vast part of the land and in completely different living conditions.
            Why does everyone look at Putin as a person, and not as a certain system or party? We do not blame the United States for its bipartisan system, which has been changing people for 250 years, but not changing its external and internal course and key bosses of America from the Fed, and after all, these people and these parties have always been in real power for centuries! And the preza election is like that, the owner decided to change the glove doll for 4-8 years to guide it through a well-known hole. In Britain, the same garbage, only abruptly - the real power of the eternal queens / th and the Rodschilds and two essentially identical little parties for centuries
      3. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 16: 12 New
        • 5
        • 10
        -5
        maxim947
        I correctly understand that the bulk of those who are now attacking Tereshkova are people who supported the usurpation of power by Yeltsin in 1993, the constitution of 93, written by the blood of slandered patriots, and the useless play with the election of 5% Yeltsin in 96 ?
        I’m glorifying Comrade Caesar at least for the fact that he did not become like the Buonaparty and does not solve issues with the capital’s ochlos, which was crippled by significance, by buckshot. Believe the person who survived the tank shooting of parliament and your other democracy - it costs a lot. And it is precisely the reluctance to start the red wheel that provides Caesar with restrained popular love, and not the miserable 5% drunk Borusik.
        1. maxim947 12 March 2020 16: 32 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          All this sounds beautiful, but no more. Do not scare people that everything will fall apart, tired already. And do not imagine yourself indispensable. The duty of the authorities to carry out competent reforms, develop the country and build or maintain a political course. And do not usurp power. The GDP has done a lot of good things and special thanks to him for that, and history will judge the rest, for the pension reform, for the multimillion-dollar earnings of the heads of state corporations, etc. , but my opinion is that he already sat out, and most importantly his surroundings sat out. There is no need to fear change, but for this it is necessary to create healthy political competition and, unfortunately, nothing will change while these “rotten parties” sit in the Duma. But since everyone is happy with everything, we will not see any changes in the near future.
          1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 16: 55 New
            • 8
            • 8
            0
            maxim947, "do not scare people that everything will fall apart"))) Rebayiki, why, you really do not see what is happening in the world? Where is it - your "political competition", when and where was it or is it? In the Union with one party and its "guiding role", which lasted only 70 years and then collapsed itself? Or in Matrasia or Great Britain, where two essentially identical partiqs are more than two centuries old, and the Fed system specialists have real power, who only change the prezik as a glove doll and direct it through the hole known in the glove doll?
            You are strange people. And what, once there was another system in Russia? And what is it that everyone writes "cling to power." Guys, no one bothers to vote for any candidates, there are "communists", there is Yavlinsky, there is anyone)
            Why does everyone look at Putin as a person, and not as a certain system or party? We do not blame the United States for its bipartisan system, which has been changing people for 250 years, but not changing its external and internal course and key bosses of America from the Fed, and after all, these people and these parties have always been in real power for centuries! And the preza election is like that, the owner decided to change the glove doll for 4-8 years to guide it through a well-known hole.
            And what's wrong with Putin’s system? We are changing prime ministers, ministers who are responsible for internal affairs, governors. In fact, Putin, understanding the fragility of everything, simply acts as a guarantor of the very system, allowing the system to evolve through updating the administrative resource.
            Here are the Great rulers of Russia, Russia and how much they ruled (some approximately)
            1. Vladimir the Red Sun 37 years.
            2. Yaroslav the Wise 35 years.
            3. Vsevolod the Big Nest is 35 years old.
            4. Dmitry Donskoy is 29 years old.
            5. Ivan III, a collector of Russian land for 55 years.
            6. Ivan IV the Terrible 37 years.
            7. Peter I the Great 39 years.
            9. Catherine II the Great 34 years.
            10. Joseph Stalin 29 years
            PS And enough already to retire the Pension, the retirement age has been raised a long time ago all over the world, Russia the latter has just done it. In the United States, it was raised to 67 long ago, throughout the CIS a few years ago it was raised (even in my small homeland Belarus, it will be raised now), in Britain and Germany it is raised to 68 and they are still going, in China they are systematically raised to 70 (this is subject to that there only 30% of pence get it, the rest only from their children). But only for some reason they decided to raise a wave through foreign NGOs and "independent" online media, apparently so that in some Britain it would not be paidsmile
        2. edasko 12 March 2020 16: 34 New
          • 7
          • 5
          +2
          Those. should I restrainedly love your Caesar for the fact that he has completely (so far) not gone mad?
          Tereshkov is not worthy to poison, of course. This is just an elderly honored man who was pushed to the podium to voice the people's will ..
          1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 17: 06 New
            • 4
            • 6
            -2
            edasko, stop carrying nonsense and re-read what I said above
            1. edasko 12 March 2020 17: 33 New
              • 6
              • 5
              +1
              That you are nonsense. Do you even get to know how in the states and Germany raised the retirement age. On the opening day of the World Cup? On the sly? This is their Siluanov said that 3 tr. per year, our pensioners will travel abroad? What are the kings to list? They weren’t re-elected because they were good? But what about the person who lies like breathing? Who promised that pence. age will not lift? Who promised to protect everyone in the Donbass? Who promised that there would be no more re-election? Here you are Sergey, tell me - is it a man or yap? Do you act like that too? What can you believe in him? So shit is your system that you could not build in 20 years. I want to have hope. China and I started together, they were even worse. And where is China now and where are we? The amount of resources is simply not comparable. For 20 years, stability and stagnation, stability and stagnation. Oil is getting more expensive, gas is getting more expensive. Oil is getting cheaper, gas is getting more expensive. Nothing changes except the Forbes list of billionaires. They have no money for retirement, but where did they go from the funds? Do not know?
              1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 19: 26 New
                • 6
                • 2
                +4
                edasko, you are boring, a set of stamps, your thought goes in a circle, the slogans of the learned roomy and liberal propaganda, one to one like the network hohlomaydaunov hanging out in Russian public. Who started with “China” together? It was we who built all production in China from 40-60s from scratch and they didn’t do it to us, the West helped China from the late 70s by investing their production of about $ 20 trillion, and not to us, it was the collapse of resources organized by the top of the partnership and the West, the Union and the West the breakdown of all production chains (as well as actually a new civil war in the 90s and emigration) and not in China. What are the "equal conditions" here? About the numerical difference of 10 times our and the Chinese population in general I am silent.
                What was the “difference in raising the retirement age in Germany, the states, China and other Belarus,” what do you write about? What the difference is at what point they raised, if before 2018 it was done all over the world, and in Russia only in 2019? And if one touched on a phrase said 15 years ago, so let's recall any world and domestic politician in past and present history and easily find hundreds of phrases that these politicians did not contain, I assure Putin that he will be an order of magnitude higher morally than they are.
                And where does the Donbass, he left Ukraine? Wake up. And yes, the President primarily protects his citizens, and not citizens of other states (in this case, by the way, half a million Donetsk citizens became Russian citizens in six months). And why is it interesting that Stalin did not exempt from Polish and European punishers from 1919 to 1939 the half of my little homeland of Belarus and half of Ukraine? Why was this done only after occasional cumbersome circumstances thanks to the well-known Molotov-Ribentrop Pact? And if there wasn’t this smlchichnost, would my father and his relatives from the Brest region be forcibly transferred to the Poles or even rotted, and I and my children would not be born at all? Why did the Soviet government drag on for so long, since extrapolating those times and proportions it had much more resources than Russia in the current geopolitical situation. Simply, guys, there are your “noble soul impulses”, and there is world geopolitics, the art of the possible, this often does not coincide with your desires.
                Where is "gas more expensive"? Gasoline has been standing still for half a year and current events have not affected it at all (like other groups of goods, by the way).
                What "no money pensions"? Pensions are paid to everyone and indexed regularly, it’s not for you 90s with a pension of $ 12 and they didn’t pay half a year.
                Data from the IMF, UN, World Bank, World Health Organization:
                Over 20 years, RF PPP GDP grew by 6 times, average RF PP by PPP grew by 4,5 times, the number of personal cars among Russians grew by almost 7 times, the volume of housing construction annually increased by 6 times (15 million sq. M and 90 million sq. m), infant mortality from 91 years old decreased from 20 per 1000 births to 4,6 per 1000 births (by the way, one of the lowest in the world, for comparison in the States 6,5 per 1000), the length of federal routes from 91 years ( The RSFSR and the Russian Federation) increased from 39 thousand km to 81 thousand km, the length of paved roads since 91 years (the RSFSR and the Russian Federation) increased from 750 thousand km to 1 million 300 thousand km. All the ports of the Union in 91 shipped only 800 million tons of products per year, and now only the ports of Russia (new and old) ship about 1 billion tons of products annually. The whole Union at a maximum per year collected 124 million tons of grain, now Russia alone collects from 120 to 135 million tons of grain. Throughout its history, the Union, and especially the impoverished Russia of the 90s, has been a major importer of food, and now Russia is one of the world's largest exporters of food, since the 90th year (the RSFSR and the Russian Federation), poultry meat production has grown 3,5 times, pork 10 times, we We have been a net exporter of these types of products for a long time and in our stores from Sakhalin to Kaliningrad for 90 years you will not find anywhere domestic chicken, turkey and pork. Everyone remembers the “Bush legs” of the 80s and the humanitarian aid of the late 4s, and now it's time to call “Putin's legs” after last year a number of large poultry companies in the Kursk region signed a contract with the Pentagon (do not be surprised) for the supply of chicken to the American army. Infa on the net, find it easy. Russia is the world's largest exporter of wheat and vegetable oil, the 85th exporter of fish in the world, self-sufficiency in beef is already about 90%, fish is over 94%, milk is about 65%, but vegetables are 10% but about 20% about XNUMX years ago.
                Everybody remembers the crisis of the Soviet nuclear industry of the 80s, Chernobyl and the early disasters of 50-70s at the Mayak, the base of submarines in Kamchatka, etc. And now the State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom is a global leader, 68% (!!!) of new nuclear power plants under construction on the planet, 50% of the global uranium enrichment market, 60% of the RTG market (all space probes of any countries on our nuclear batteries), the only company capable of building and building icebreakers , floating nuclear power plants, MOX fuel of a new technological structure and a closed nuclear cycle, the only company developing nuclear propulsion systems, a world leader in the development of high-power lasers, 5 of the four new transuranic elements of the periodic table were synthesized in Russia in Dubna, and not in China, the states or somewhere else in europe.
                Gold reserves in 99 were only $ 9 billion and zero gold and a public debt of about 150% of GDP, in the gold and foreign currency reserves of the Union in 91 there were less than 300 tons of gold and the crazy public debt was about $ 200 billion of those 1991 dollars, and now the gold and foreign currency of the Russian Federation is about $ 750 billion plus gold 2300, budget surplus for 15 consecutive years and almost zero public debt. Life expectancy from 99 years increased by 8,5 years from 65 to 73,5 years, the number of street children on the streets decreased from 2 million to zero, the number of orphans in Russian orphanages from 99 decreased from almost 600 thousand to 50 thousand, the annual number of abortions in the 90s it was from 2 to 4 million, and in 2019 only 550 thousand. I’m silent about the maternity capital of 600 thousand, there was no such gift either in Russia in the 90s or in the Union in any country in the world now and earlier. The Union with all its 15 republics and 290 million people built a maximum of 74 million square meters of housing in a year, and Russia has been building annually about 4 million square meters of housing over the past 90 years. Over the past 19 years, more new bridges have been built in Russia than half a century before (including the period of the RSFSR), data from the Association of Russian Builders. As far back as 99m, state property was about 20% of the Russian economy and now 75% of the country's economy, there is a gradual nationalization, the most Stalinist state capitalism, only without repression and you can easily stink on the couch, posing as a zarodnik and cursing the authorities))
                Under Putin, we liberated 85% of Syria by destroying 140 militants (7000 of them from the Russian Federation and the CIS) and driving America, Turks, NATO and their Middle Eastern satklilit out of most of the SAR, we returned Crimea, we drove out the Amers from Venezuela, we took half from the West World Arctic (with its oil and gas worth trillions of dollars), we are implementing the largest infrastructural, industrial and energy projects throughout Russia, we have created the most powerful Strategic Nuclear Forces on the planet and were the first in the world to deploy hypersonic weapons, Russia has regained the status of a superpower (without 14 fraternal republics and half of the Union’s resources measured, not from 290 but from 147 million people), we have become one of the leading geopolitical players. And all this we achieved without the Gulags, repressions, and multi-million dollar Komsomol construction projects, having actually gone through the 2nd civil war and terrorist attacks of the 90s, a massive outflow of the population in the 90s, and the looting of the 90s.
                1. maxim947 12 March 2020 19: 54 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  That's right, I also read SUN regularly, and therefore, as I wrote, thanks. For Crimea especially. But one does not need to think and convince oneself that there are no more worthy ones. They are, and his task is to adequately leave as the constitution interprets and leave behind a healthy political system.
                  No one forbids staying in politics and continuing to work for the good of the country. But this "zeroing the deadlines" is already too much. Imho.
                  1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 20: 53 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    maxim947, you sculpt me cons? I don’t bet you, but oh well. Where are the worthy, name it, or the people in a large mass of 147 million do not know, we will discuss. And most importantly, the President is not appointed and elected, and with a multitude of international observers who are not at all friendly in each hole, therefore, the elections are more than an objective attitude of tens of millions of Russians to their leader (and it’s a sin to conceal to the world) leader. The next elections will be held and you, like me, like all citizens of the country, are free to vibrate any of the candidates. That's who the majority of the people will choose - that and the President, this is the main LAW. And yes, in the current pre-war electrified threatening planetary catastrophe, we will not deal with democratic snot, for this we are strengthening sovereignty, large-scale re-equipment of the Army, referendum on constitutional amendments, gradual nationalization of the economy and much more.
                    1. maxim947 12 March 2020 21: 11 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      At first a couple slapped, in my opinion, excessive idealism.
                      The election is yes, democracy .. I can not help but recall the single "package" of amendments, is that your choice? I will vote in favor, but only because of the amendment, which abolishes the priority of international law.
                      And all the same people are worthy, just not athletes and widows should sit in the State Duma and the Federation Council appointed by party lists, deputies elected by regions.
                      Best regards hi
                2. edasko 12 March 2020 21: 15 New
                  • 1
                  • 3
                  -2
                  Sarmat Sanych, you (I write like you with a lowercase letter) are just as merry as a mossy pseudo-patriot who has no real fancy time for Putin.
                  China. Since 1979, China has embarked on a transition from a closed society to an open one, counting on the influx of foreign investment. The West helped China, and under the rule of the Communists. What does it mean helping? He invested money, as it was profitable. And who prevented us from doing all this? Equal conditions? Yes equal. China suppressed its freaks with tanks in a well-known area, and we went about it. Who is to blame for the fact that the stupid people themselves.
                  Retirement age. In the States, it has been announced over the years that there will be an increase in the retirement age. In Germany, too, everything was done humanly. There is a point system, look interesting yourself. They have a man receives an average pension of more than 1000 euros, a woman of more than 700. So you specifically pretend to or do not really understand the difference between our ruling freaks and theirs? I do not mind raising the pins. age. I am for this to be done humanly. It must be quietly done on World Cup day. Take it, tear your ass off the chair and tell people what and how. Or are you personally pleased that they are treated like cattle? But they do. And let everyone be on equal footing. Not enough money, let's sell these palaces of pins. funds. Or are you ready to endure this? Press your friends.
                  Everything, then there is simply no time and effort to disassemble everything. In principle, yes, everything is true. Only each line is demagogy. And the accident at the Mayak for some reason is attributed, and the Donbass like ... they didn’t put me in the ice hole and the people there, who believed in chatter, gold (for me, what?), Maternal capital is simply manna from heaven (in the USSR and without him more gave birth). In Syria, already three times all defeated and withdrawn troops, and it seems stuck there as in Afghanistan. As for the superpower, it’s also somehow slippery, 12th in GDP, Brazil is cooler than us. There are only 2 super powers - the USA and China. Everything else, your fantasies and unsupported desires. So this is your propaganda, comrade.
                  Seriously, I sincerely worry about my country. And if I don’t drool from tenderness at the sight of yourself knowing someone, this does not mean that I'm bad and I need to be blamed. I’m just firmly convinced that lying is not good and that nothing shines with this power, it exhausted itself about 5 years ago.
                  1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 22: 47 New
                    • 4
                    • 2
                    +2
                    edasko, all my data is confirmed by leading international sources, and again you whine and parrot. And here, "China has suppressed and we are not," and what does this have to do with Putin? The fact that the leadership of the Union then made a catastrophic mistake and betrayal - no one argues, but what does this have to do with Putin? He then defended the interests of the motherland in the GDR, questions to the then communists in power. I just say what we went through and still reached the highest level and through which China did not go even 1%. By the way, where were you at the 91st coup? Where are the 40 million members of the Communist Party of the USSR sitting at home? So why are you giving up some presents while sitting on the couch now? At the same time, we do not forget that China “earned” thanks to rapid development, and it earned the ecology most polluted on the planet, almost no forests, no unprotected rivers and lakes, fresh water remained only for 30 years, the highest level of oncology in the world (Chinese cancer villages the whole world knows), smogs over cities do not go away almost 365 days a year, and much more. And you would start to plow all the last 70 years of Chinese development for 10-14 hours a day? Are you aware that in China until the 90s pensions were not paid at all and even now only 30% of the population is paid? The old man and the old woman do not have a working daughter-son plowing in some Shanghai and deducting 40% of earnings to their parents - a scavenger. It’s better not to write about China in order not to fall into a puddle - my company has been sending business delegations of Russian builders to Beijing and Shanghai for almost a decade to various forums, so I know Chinese “life charms” better than anyone on the site, I assure you - after what you saw begin to pray for our lives. But what about the total absence of independent media in the PRC, electronic control, total censorship on the net, and many other surprises, you would have been sitting in a police station for a long time after such emissions, and then the party card on the table, from the company the Chinese party owner (there they are) on the next day the tour with a wolf, after that only a janitor.
                    By the way, China, with all its rapid development, has still not reached the 20% level of our planet’s most powerful Strategic Nuclear Potential, and if the Union didn’t help under Stalin, it would be like they were at the level of today's Sevkorei. Yes, and for conventional weapons, engines are still being bought from us, they are buying S-400s, they are buying Su-35s, and most interestingly, they can’t even copy normally what they stole and bought from us in the 90s and what they stole in the West. Our old S-300s could not be reproduced normally, so it was the Russian S300s bought in the 90s plus now our Triumphs that protect the sky over Beijing.
                    What are you writing about the States there, do you even know the life there? My sister is a cousin of USA since 2010, a suburb of LA, to give her N so that she could tell you what 600 or 1000 dollars in America are and what you can’t extend for that money a month even with a homeless person under a bridge? In the course that in the United States 45 million poor and homeless, by the way, UN data? And this is with their infinite free press for tens of trillions of dollars, and Russia lives on her own money and still successfully opposes the whole West, despite the most severe sanctions. You can go to Google right now and get “cameras online” and any major city in the States, Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco, Chicago, etc. and see thousands of tents with homeless people right on the streets of cities, and in the suburbs are not houses from Hollywood films but trailers, moreover, rusty and cracked, there will be people cooking around them at the stake. Such is America. This zvezdezh about the fact that "in the west, pensioners around the world ride" has already been denied hundreds of times, for example, in Germany, pensioners who can be attributed to travelers - only 10%, this is by the way German state statistics. But social shops with cheap overdue loans and tiny house-boxes of 40 square meters throughout Germany grow like mushrooms.
                    And where is the comparison of Syria and Afghanistan, do you want to finally screw it up?)) The union of the whole multimillion-dollar country and the most powerful army disgraced the whole world in Afghanistan, putting 15 thousand lives, about 400 thousand wounded, ditching there about 800 (in total) planes and helicopters, after which he spat away from Afghanistan as a result, and the Kikoma who were at war were not needed even in the late Soviet times. So I’m not even comparing the effectiveness of the armies of this and that, I’ll compare for interest the current ultra-modern Russian army with a kind of “exceptional” army of Omerika:
                    US losses in Iraq (2003-2010): 24 aircraft, 137 helicopters, 530 Abrams, $ 2 trillion. In Afghanistan: 31 aircraft, 113 helicopters, $ 1,5 trillion. The total irretrievable loss of American helicopters in Afghanistan + Iraq is 568, while they fly only on holidays. The US casualties during the same period in Iraq: almost 4500 Pentagon military personnel and about 35 Amer’s PMC officers, wounded are not countable. In Afghanistan: more than 2400 Pentagon fatalities, about 25000 PMK officers, wounded darkness.
                    Russia in Syria over 5 years: 7 aircraft (2 did not land on Kuznetsov), 7 helicopters, 102 military. And now we control 85% of the SAR, the volume of Rosobornexport contracts has grown to $ 55 billion, and the Syrian campaign itself has invested in the small budget of the Moscow Region. And the Americans control only 5% of Afghanistan for fear of getting out of their bases, they expel the exceptional ones from Iraq with rags, all Iraqi deposits were long ago taken from American companies and given to the Russian, Chinese, French. and Indian. YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THEM AND OUR EFFICIENCY.
                    Further, what the hell is "12th place of GDP", are you friends with your head? In comparing the GDP of different countries, PPP GDP is strictly applied, and Russia has $ 4,3 trillion, 5th in the world, higher than for example Britain, Italy and France, plus we have almost zero public debt and gold reserves of $ 750 billion, and for the above countries public debt of 100% and above percent of GDP, meager gold reserves and yes, and even 80% of the gross product consists of manipulations with stocks, a printed news base and the service sector. Only Russia has real GDP, of course, India and China.
                    And finally, about the dollar, what do you care about the dollar, why do you buy it for dollars?)) Food in Russia is 99% domestic, housing and communal services, medical services, transport and much more do not depend on the dollar exchange rate, and much from what depended earlier - now much less. About the price increase after crises, there is a lot of hype, take a look at the pro-Western RBC how prices have risen after the crises, thanks to import substitution, the increase every time was less and less: https://www.rbc.ru/business/10/03/2020/5e67945d9a79477b785d8772?from = from_main
                    There, at the end of the article, an increase, for example, for medical services in 99m was 35% and in 2018 4%, for transport in 99m 43% and in 2018 4%, for housing in 99m 32% and in 2018 3%, for gasoline 99m 301% and in 2018 9%, for products in 99m 36% and in 2018 4,7%, for building materials in 99m 46,6% and in 2018 4,9%.
                    Plus, after each crisis, the state’s share in the Russian economy increases, up to 98th it was 20%, until 2008 it was 35%, until 2014 it was about 50%, now it is 75%. Because in case of collapse of prices for shares of companies on European exchanges, the state buys them cheap from Western investors thanks to the huge gold reserves. And the dividends from these shares now go to the state budget and not over the hill.
                    1. edasko 12 March 2020 23: 06 New
                      • 1
                      • 4
                      -3
                      Listen, here on this "And finally about the dollar, what do you care about the dollar, why do you need it, what do you buy for dollars?" You can end our "conversation". Otherwise, I will finally lose faith in the adequacy of our people. I wish you all the best and bright ...
                      1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 23: 23 New
                        • 4
                        • 1
                        +3
                        Yes, you just have nothing to answer, one eternal nagging and no specifics, no suggestions. And most of the expenses we make for a month - food, electricity, transportation costs, housing and communal services, etc. - they are all domestic production, do not depend on the $ rate. Remember what Stalin said? Do not know - do not criticize, criticize - offer, offer - act and bear responsibility. Who do you propose, what kind of policy, let's discuss? Just a warning - I’ll post so many real facts to any of these common-minded, right-wing and liberal-non-system politicians that you don’t even choose him as the director of your housing office. Well, there is no political figure standing at least a speck of dust under the feet of Vladimir Vladimirovich, such is the reality. Moreover, that in the domestic politics, that in the international.
                3. edasko 12 March 2020 21: 40 New
                  • 2
                  • 4
                  -2
                  I almost forgot. “Where does gasoline rise in price? Gasoline has been standing still for six months and current events have not affected it at all (like other groups of goods, by the way).” You do not distort. I wrote about the dependence of oil and gas prices. And how will events affect prices? So wait until April 22nd. Right now, the central bank will dump the currency on the exchange, they will keep it at the level of 75. And after 22, when the rams vote for our everything, you will feel it in full measure. And you will have 60 gasoline, and 90 dollars each. Although they can do some kind of feint with your ears again. Once again, the pension fund will be robbed, deposits may freeze. After all, our people are new oil, they’ll figure out how to pump it out.
          2. Overlock 12 March 2020 17: 40 New
            • 13
            • 3
            +10
            Quote: edasko
            This is just an old honored man

            should sit at home and watch TV or knit socks
    2. Sergey Olegovich 12 March 2020 13: 51 New
      • 38
      • 10
      +28
      Shame on the Communist Party! We must think of abstaining from voting on constitutional amendments! They had to either vote against or boycott the meeting of the State Duma. They abstained. Abstained Christmas tree sticks.
      1. Vladimir B. 12 March 2020 13: 53 New
        • 29
        • 6
        +23
        Quote: Sergey Olegovich
        Shame on the Communist Party!

        What can you do if we cannot find other communists ... These are our leftists.
        1. For example 12 March 2020 14: 47 New
          • 7
          • 10
          -3
          Quote: Vladimir B.
          if we don’t find other communists ...

          There are no other communists laughing

          Tell us why should the Communists uphold the integrity of the current Constitution?
          1. For example 12 March 2020 14: 49 New
            • 7
            • 10
            -3
            Quote: Sergey Olegovich
            Shame on the Communist Party! We must think of abstaining from voting on constitutional amendments! They had to or vote against

            Do you plan to fight?
            For the inviolability of the constitution of Nemtsov you will lay bones? laughing
            1. St Petrov 12 March 2020 14: 54 New
              • 10
              • 8
              +2
              Do you plan to fight?
              For the inviolability of the constitution of Nemtsov you will lay bones?

              b - the struggle.

              Tell us why the communists should defend ...


              should not. do not stand apart. they are pseudo-communists who cannot do anything. They could not even take power in 1996, which suddenly almost turned up

              While there such as sternum, balabol Platoshkin and Zyuganov - this is not even a statist error. Imitation. Latent struggle.
          2. Arlen 12 March 2020 15: 15 New
            • 22
            • 5
            +17
            Quote: For example
            Tell us

            What hangover did you see to it that the Communists uphold the bourgeois correction of the constitution written by the Americans? Communists, not those who call themselves Communists, urge the creation of a new constitution for the Russian Federation based on our historical experience. It is you who advocate the adoption of bourgeois amendments to the constitution written by the states.
            1. St Petrov 12 March 2020 15: 23 New
              • 13
              • 17
              -4
              chum your heard, gussky oppositionist, advocating universal gussky happiness
              1. Arlen 12 March 2020 15: 27 New
                • 24
                • 5
                +19
                Oh, and here it is Petrov appeared. I did not expect to see you. Thank you for shining your face in front of my eyes. Does your forehead accidentally hurt? You strike the anti-people policies so hard that I feel sorry for the gender.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. Arlen 12 March 2020 15: 39 New
                    • 22
                    • 5
                    +17
                    Quote: c-Petrov
                    take pity on yourself. sad oppositionist.

                    Petrov, petrov ... Are you from the generation of Komsomol merchants?
                    Quote: c-Petrov
                    How does anyone take you to work?

                    They take it, and moreover with pleasure!
                2. Stas157 12 March 2020 16: 02 New
                  • 11
                  • 6
                  +5
                  Quote: Arlen
                  Oh, and here it is Petrov appeared. ... Your forehead doesn’t hurt? You strike the anti-people policies so hard that I feel sorry for the gender.

                  No, he has trained, familiar!)))
      2. Honest Citizen 12 March 2020 14: 04 New
        • 18
        • 10
        +8
        Shame on the Communist Party!

        Those who are in the Duma are no longer communists. I won’t be surprised if they have a EdRa party card in their pocket.
        1. AU Ivanov. 12 March 2020 16: 06 New
          • 1
          • 5
          -4
          You are mistaken. In the Duma, we have mainly former communists and Komsomol members. In all fractions. Although the former communists do not exist. This is our misfortune.
      3. U-58 12 March 2020 14: 53 New
        • 2
        • 5
        -3
        Oddly enough, but the glory of the Communist Party.
        You do not need to engage in Gaponism;
        Vote the Communist Party against, they would immediately be turned from cooler to matting, would be made enemies of the Russian people.
        As a result: a further weakening of the positions of the Communists in anticipation of the upcoming persecution of the people
        1. AK1972 12 March 2020 15: 27 New
          • 9
          • 1
          +8
          Quote: U-58
          Vote the Communist Party against, they would immediately be turned from cooler to matting, would be made enemies of the Russian people.

          They would not be exposed as enemies, but put out of the Duma, and this is very disadvantageous and even painful.
        2. Cut Samshitov 12 March 2020 15: 30 New
          • 10
          • 1
          +9
          Quote: U-58
          Oddly enough, but the glory of the Communist Party.
          You do not need to engage in Gaponism;
          Vote the Communist Party against, they would immediately be turned from cooler to matting, would be made enemies of the Russian people.
          As a result: a further weakening of the positions of the Communists in anticipation of the upcoming persecution of the people

          Awesome logic! Those. the opposition should support government initiatives so as not to lose access to the feeding trough. And nah ... why such an opposition ???
          1. U-58 12 March 2020 19: 12 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            And what, supported?
            This Zhirinovsky all sorts of escapades and outrageous get away with it.
            But the Communists have spread rot and will spread rot.
            Have you forgotten a candidate from the Communist Party of the non-partisan Grudinin?
        3. Svarog 12 March 2020 15: 41 New
          • 12
          • 3
          +9
          Quote: U-58
          Vote the Communist Party against, they would immediately be turned from cooler to matting, would be made enemies of the Russian people.

          Enemies of the Russian people are already visible .. Their actions are visible and it is not difficult to recognize them by their deeds. The Communists had to vote against. For those who decided to amend the Constitution, change it for themselves and the people of the new Constitution does not shine anything good .. The Communist Party unfortunately pocket opposition .. so the interests of the people do not defend ..
        4. Arlen 12 March 2020 16: 15 New
          • 18
          • 2
          +16
          Quote: U-58
          would make enemies of the Russian people

          Do not you know that the Communists and so they expose the enemies of the Russian people. Now, after abstaining from voting on constitutional amendments, they will not vote for the party and 10% of voters. Voters, supporters of the communist party, will not forgive the vote on the amendments. Zyuganov and Co., did everything to destroy the opinion of voters about the Communist Party and weaken the already weak position of the communist movement. That is what you should have thought about first, and not blamed anyone for "Gaponism."
      4. Arlen 12 March 2020 15: 21 New
        • 21
        • 3
        +18
        Quote: Sergey Olegovich
        Shame of the Communist Party

        The Communist Party is not Zyuganov and deputies from the party in the State Duma. The Communist Party is the millions of Russian citizens who vote for the party in the elections. But Zyuganov and other opportunists must be removed from the party and all the communist parties of Russia should be united into one. So it’s right to say: “Shame on Zyuganov and the deputies calling themselves the great word Communists.”
        1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 16: 15 New
          • 4
          • 7
          -3
          Arlen, where did you see the Communists now and who are you proposing? Guys, stop talking garbage and utopian ideas.
          1. Arlen 12 March 2020 16: 19 New
            • 18
            • 3
            +15
            Sergey, at the moment I do not offer anyone. I propose that all communist movements unite in one big party. Hold one big congress of all communist parties. Will it work out? More likely no than yes. But worth a try. As for utopian ideas ... Can I clarify which ones?
            1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 16: 28 New
              • 4
              • 5
              -1
              Utopian ideas that have sunk into oblivion for only 70 years old, or rather, after 29 years in 53 years. Willing to step on the same rake? And all the “communist parties" in total took only a miserable 13 percent in the recent presidential election, while the course of Strong and Great Russia Vladimir Vladimirovich gained more than 76% of popular support. This is an objective indicator, not a howl from the Internet. But we digress from the topic, who do you propose? I will help with the "choice"laughing:
              Maybe he was infantile on the salary of Khodor Semin with the same scammers Boldyrev and Strawnikin?) I’m aware that Kostik received education and training in the United States, received American bonuses there, his wife, child, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son, and he the son of a former rather big official, then a deputy of the Sverdlovsk region, and even the head of a pro-Western fund? Plus, Victor Semin in 2011 was deputy chairman of the board of a large regional Rosbank, which he, along with the board of directors, successfully went bankrupt, withdrawing 11 billion more of those rubles at the rate of 25). It is easy to guess that the money went to the family.
              Who is there next, the creator of Yabloko Boldyrev, who has nowhere to put stigmas on? About the fact that Yuri Yuryevich was one of the initiators of collateral auctions and one of the creators of the predatory "production sharing agreement" with the West in the early 90s - it’s not worth mentioning, this is also not his main sin.
              Who else is there, Grudinin? A pathological liar, a cashier, a deceiver, a two-faced, a bigamist, sold Turkish strawberries under the guise of his, with a bunch of foreign accounts, hundreds of kg of gold (and officially) and property. Great Strawberry Houdini). Presenting an appraisal judgment of such garbage is the same as if a prostitute began to teach us morality.
              In the 90s, all current positioners were in business. Platoshkin in the state at midak Kozyrev traded the interests of Russia. Grudinin and his brothers dragged everything that was not pinned to the floor with nails, and then sold thousands of hectares of “golden” Moscow land with various oligarch Agalarov to various Auchans, Metro and others. Zyuganov and his associates in the Commercial Party of the Russian Federation accepted in the Duma of the 1st and 2nd convocations production sharing agreements and privatization lawyers. The golden child Semin frolic in the clubs of what's in the States. Well, the oligarchs Nevzlin and Khodor, sponsoring them all, dragged well fluid into their pocket for tens of billions of dollars. It is clear that they now have less expanse. I want to return happy days.
              1. Arlen 12 March 2020 16: 55 New
                • 17
                • 3
                +14
                Wow, how many have printed.
                Just a Jules Verne novel, not a comment.
                I ran a look at your comment ... You created a whole cocktail of everything and everyone. Piled in one pile and Grudinin, and Yavlinsky, and Nevzlin and others ...
                I do not even want to spoil such a "beauty" with my refutation. I even put a plus sign for you, for your work on printing this comment.
                1. Arlen 12 March 2020 16: 57 New
                  • 17
                  • 2
                  +15
                  Quote: Arlen
                  and Yavlinsky

                  Wrong))). Not Yavlinsky, but Boldyrev.
                  1. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 17: 18 New
                    • 3
                    • 4
                    -1
                    Boldyreva, that's right. The very garbage that was behind the laws on the separation of products, the one that was part of the Communist Party coalition to support Grudinin, the one that hangs out on the channels of the co-owned Semin, Kagarlitsky, Rudogo, etc., in short, the whole company that Khodor started financing before his release, and after serving continued: https://www.putin-today.ru/archives/94840
                    It is obvious to one of me that emocommies work for an uneducated, unearned and low-skilled audience, playing on their envy, stupidity, inability to analyze facts, cause-effect relationships, and for the most part, for these reasons not in demand? Apparently yes, it’s easier to convince those who live better — this is not because they work day and night, but because they have stolen. That "we are power here." And what is the easiest way to live in abundance - to arrange a coup, and then take and share everything. The main thing is that they press on greed and envy, the most base feelings of a loser. Immediately recalls the "Euroopean pansii and sn." Stupidity, but not smart people believe and do it.
                2. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 17: 09 New
                  • 2
                  • 3
                  -1
                  Arlene, you can put a minus, do not worry so). I’ve put a minus for your empty comment, but you yourself understand that you are writing without meaning.
    3. knn54 12 March 2020 14: 00 New
      • 9
      • 6
      +3
      In the USSR, the worst thing for workers was the "wishes of the workers."
      In particular: "at the request of the workers" the Soviet Union collapsed "...
      1. Aerodrome 12 March 2020 14: 14 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        watching live meetings ... where are they all? absenteeism? the virus? But unanimously they will accept. Yes, urban, but where are they all?
      2. Sarmat Sanych 12 March 2020 16: 30 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        knn54, so it is, in principle
  2. Honest Citizen 12 March 2020 13: 40 New
    • 21
    • 17
    +4
    Yes, he will go to the polls, he will. There is even no doubt, unfortunately.
    1. ximkim 12 March 2020 13: 47 New
      • 16
      • 12
      +4
      And he will win the election, since a large percentage of voters (citizens) support him.
      1. unaha 12 March 2020 15: 01 New
        • 10
        • 2
        +8
        And then! We have fools in store for hundreds of years.
    2. Vladimir B. 12 March 2020 13: 55 New
      • 26
      • 8
      +18
      Of course it will. If someone constantly asks him on behalf of the people, only now no one asks the opinion of the people.
      1. Honest Citizen 12 March 2020 13: 56 New
        • 15
        • 9
        +6
        If someone constantly asks him on behalf of the people

        Reminded: at the numerous requests of the working people ... dear Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev ... to present the Order of the Hero of Socialist Labor.
    3. Uncle lee 12 March 2020 13: 56 New
      • 31
      • 12
      +19
      Something like this ...
      1. Prjanik 12 March 2020 14: 34 New
        • 6
        • 4
        +2
        Something like this ...
        Where do you find such drug addictions?) This law has already been adopted and has nothing to do with the Constitution. laughing
        1. Uncle lee 12 March 2020 14: 47 New
          • 10
          • 4
          +6
          Quote: Prjanik
          has

          It has ! It even has, to raise the rating! soldier
          1. Prjanik 12 March 2020 14: 54 New
            • 5
            • 2
            +3
            It has ! It even has, to raise the rating! soldier
            Well, understand, sorry for interfering here in the wrestling idyll hi So it’s just funny, but then the picture caught on, could not resist. smile
        2. Svarog 12 March 2020 15: 46 New
          • 12
          • 4
          +8
          Quote: Prjanik
          Something like this ...
          Where do you find such drug addictions?) This law has already been adopted and has nothing to do with the Constitution. laughing

          how it doesn’t, it still has it .. it’s necessary to cheer up the electorate .. and then raising the retirement age, VAT, taxes and other requisitions seriously ranks the ranks of those who are FOR .. here at least they try to throw some crumbs .. But the attempt must be said so-so .. much more serious is the next weakening of the ruble and as a result, after a couple of months, the people will become even poorer .. So they are in a hurry with the Constitution ..
          1. Prjanik 12 March 2020 15: 58 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            how it doesn’t, it still has it .. it’s necessary to cheer up the electorate .. and then raising the retirement age, VAT, taxes and other requisitions seriously ranks the ranks of those who are FOR .. here at least they try to throw some crumbs .. But the attempt must be said so-so .. much more serious is the next weakening of the ruble and as a result, after a couple of months, the people will become even poorer .. So they are in a hurry with the Constitution ..
            Well, yes, yes, yes, because without this they won’t vote for amendments to the Constitution) It’s good that the comrades were invigorated, posted a picture, otherwise the electorate would not have known that such a law had been adopted)
        3. Overlock 12 March 2020 17: 43 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: Prjanik
          This law has already been adopted.

          after 20 years. How many thousands of children have starved over the years?
          1. Prjanik 12 March 2020 18: 00 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            after 20 years. How many thousands of children have starved over the years?
            Apparently, they starved a lot and for a long time, before this law there was never free food for our students yes
      2. Stirbjorn 12 March 2020 15: 54 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Something like this ...
        Your demotivator is very to the point, you can add that Medvedev did not give, as Boris liked to call in a helmet. So the Constitution and Medvedev, and now we’ll finally panic wassat
  3. Livonetc 12 March 2020 13: 43 New
    • 12
    • 6
    +6
    Last time I went to the polls in 1996.
    After there was no desire.
    I’ll go to the constitutional vote.
    Does it make sense or not, I’ll go all one.
    It is clear that the problems of citizens do not care about our power from the word at all.
    But they got it already specifically.
    1. bondrostov 12 March 2020 13: 48 New
      • 18
      • 12
      +6
      Unfortunately, the farther the worse and the dumber. Our government behaves very clumsy. I’m looking and thinking correctly that the young people are leaving, who can and should not be condemned, not who does not want to live in this madhouse for decades. I hope my children will be able to leave me too late.
      1. Sergey Olegovich 12 March 2020 13: 59 New
        • 27
        • 5
        +22
        I hope my son will stay in Russia, only because this is our home. Who needs us abroad.
        1. bondrostov 12 March 2020 14: 33 New
          • 5
          • 6
          -1
          Sometimes it’s better on the street than at home when you’re satisfied with “excellent living conditions” at home.
          1. Sergey Olegovich 12 March 2020 14: 45 New
            • 20
            • 4
            +16
            I agree, but maybe we are to blame for this? We are not doing anything to ensure that we are not satisfied with "excellent living conditions." We ourselves have allowed it to be so.
            1. bondrostov 12 March 2020 14: 51 New
              • 9
              • 6
              +3
              I agree absolutely! But what can I do !? Those who tried to sit and sit will be. Our people have deserved it with their lack of will and fear. My conscience is not clear when I did not vote for these “slaves in the galleys”. Just leave but I’m stupid not where, and nothing. Just discouragement from the realization that nothing can change
              1. Sergey Olegovich 12 March 2020 15: 00 New
                • 16
                • 2
                +14
                Quote: bondrostov
                But what can I do

                Alone, we can do nothing. Our strength is in unity. Only together we will be able to win. But there is one thing. This is but most of all achieves. The opposition has no leader. This is our weakness.
                1. bondrostov 12 March 2020 15: 03 New
                  • 6
                  • 4
                  +2
                  By election, this situation is no longer possible. On other methods, people have not yet "matured" and not the fact that they will mature.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. bondrostov 12 March 2020 15: 16 New
                      • 10
                      • 4
                      +6
                      A blogger like you abroad calls us Russische Schweine. Thank God there are not many of you
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                      6. bondrostov 12 March 2020 15: 33 New
                        • 8
                        • 3
                        +5
                        I told you, I’m an old evil TsRUshnik sitting in the Pentagon and thinking how to ruin Peter’s life and not let him and his great leader get off his knees!
  • U-58 12 March 2020 14: 57 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    What is clumsy ?.
    Everything is very elegant.
    We recruit almost easy 76% ....
  • kjhg 12 March 2020 13: 53 New
    • 10
    • 7
    +3
    Quote: Livonetc
    Last time I went to the polls in 1996.

    Who voted for then, if not secret?
    Quote: Livonetc
    But they got already exactly

    Not a word, indignation rolls over. As one character said, "the hand reaches for the gun"
    1. Livonetc 12 March 2020 13: 58 New
      • 13
      • 3
      +10
      Then for Yavlinsky.
      The choice of an intellectual. winked
      Now I would not vote for this person under any circumstances.
      hi
      1. kjhg 12 March 2020 14: 03 New
        • 8
        • 4
        +4
        Yeah, great then people fooled promises.
        Quote: Livonetc
        Now I would not vote for this person under any circumstances.

        Everyone can be mistaken. But not everyone can admit their mistake hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
  • Serg 122 12 March 2020 13: 48 New
    • 12
    • 24
    -12
    At least one reasonable article on this topic. Tired of the constant nagging of "all the prowlers." Moreover, with and without it. Will go. it won’t work - howl of such creatures will have little effect on Putin. It will be in demand - it will go, no ... But there is no judgment and no (now) ...
    1. unaha 12 March 2020 15: 03 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      And if it is not in demand, but it will go anyway?
  • Zoomlion 12 March 2020 13: 49 New
    • 18
    • 22
    -4
    Why is Putin bad? At the moment and in the near future there is no alternative to him.
    1. ROMAN123456 12 March 2020 14: 03 New
      • 16
      • 11
      +5
      Bgggg ..))
      This, after it is buried under the Kremlin wall (and sooner or later it will happen) - will we all die ?? From no alternative ..))
      1. Stas-90 12 March 2020 14: 38 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Something inspired.
        From a sword or from a slow old age, Aragorn will die. And you will not find comfort. Nothing diminishes the pain of this loss. He will meet death, embodying the greatness of the king of people, crowned with glory that will not fade until the last day of the existence of the world.
    2. reservist 12 March 2020 14: 55 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: ZoomLion
      at the moment and in the near future there is no alternative to it.

      but I began to like Markhaev
  • frizzy 12 March 2020 13: 51 New
    • 14
    • 20
    -6
    Yes, let him rule at least until 2045 !!! He deserved it. Without him, the people of Khan will be.
  • Ross xnumx 12 March 2020 13: 54 New
    • 17
    • 15
    +2
    Russia passed the presidency of Medvedev when Putin’s position has not become weaker at all. At that time, Putin was the most influential politician in Russia. This is likely to continue.

    Lord "Sohu" issty! We ourselves do not know Putin’s position, for he has never taken part in pre-election debates, and on regular “direct lines” he constantly deftly answers questions posed to him by himself, and gives direct answers to questions like these:

    The real leader of the country did not have to call the President of the USA and the Prime Minister of GB to Yalta for a long time. And here on the 75th anniversary of the Victory the faces are turned away ... Perhaps this is such a way of respect for an influential politician, for the country he leads ...
    "This is likely to continue ..."
    1. Loess 12 March 2020 14: 03 New
      • 11
      • 4
      +7
      Quote: ROSS 42
      The real leader of the country did not have to call the President of the USA and the Prime Minister of GB to Yalta for a long time. And here on the 75th anniversary of the Victory the faces are turned away ..

      If my memory serves me in Yalta, these people arrived in order to divide Europe. At the Victory Parade, at the very first and most important, these people were not.
      1. Ross xnumx 12 March 2020 14: 09 New
        • 10
        • 6
        +4
        Quote: Less
        If I remember correctly in Yalta, these people, in order to divide Europe.

        About.
        1. The Polish Question
        2. Spheres of influence in Europe
        3. Occupation zones in Germany
        4. Reparations
        5. The end of the war with Japan
        6. UN

        Roosevelt had rested by the time of the Parade; they had no time for the parades.
        1. Loess 12 March 2020 14: 20 New
          • 8
          • 6
          +2
          Quote: ROSS 42
          Roosevelt rested by the time of the Parade,

          Churchill was alive. Instead of Roosevelt was Truman. They were not at the parade.
          Quote: ROSS 42
          they were not up to the parades.

          But can there be other worries besides the parade?
          You perfectly understood that I pointed out to you a frank juggling.
          1. Golovan Jack 12 March 2020 14: 32 New
            • 9
            • 15
            -6
            Quote: Less
            I pointed out to you a frank juggling

            Grandfather is old, he doesn’t care (s).
    2. unaha 12 March 2020 15: 06 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      On the "straight lines" (well, at least the first), he generally stated quite sound thoughts. That's just the implementation, either none, or exactly the opposite.
  • kit88 12 March 2020 14: 04 New
    • 19
    • 7
    +12
    Putin does not want to weaken the existing power vertical ....
    No matter what position Putin occupies in the current executive after 2024, he will still be considered the center of power

    Just thoughtfully read what is written.
    He built an interesting vertical. When all control beams converge at one point, apex. Moreover, this peak is not the President of the Russian Federation, as it would be logical. And personally GDP.
    Well, it is written, and many agree with this.
    And if you remove the GDP from this vertical, everything will collapse like a house of cards?
    What kind of Russia does he want to leave behind?
    1. vanavatny 12 March 2020 14: 33 New
      • 10
      • 5
      +5
      judging by what is happening, for example, in science and education, he has no long-term plans for the development of the country, from the word completely, after us at least a flood ...
    2. kjhg 12 March 2020 15: 36 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      Quote: kit88
      What kind of Russia does he want to leave behind?

      Judging by his actions, he does not give a damn about the fate of the country that awaits us after his death.
  • Sergey39 12 March 2020 14: 07 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    In general, the Chinese wrote everything correctly. We can guess here until the second coming. And he will do as it will be necessary at the moment (when this moment comes).
  • Warrior MorePhoto 12 March 2020 14: 15 New
    • 10
    • 8
    +2
    NO! NO AND NO AGAIN!
    I personally support Platoshkin’s idea ... Putin’s direct debate live, for example with the same Platoshkin.
    Personally, I want to see, hear, and then make a conclusion.
    I would also like to see Putin in debates with other people, but not marianettes from the presidential administration.

    I began to fight, I began to explain to people, I will do it, I will continue ...
    I want to see a shadow government with their program.
    I want to see Platoshkin in the presidents.
    It's my personal opinion.
    I want a change for every person in our country for the better.

    I am against the journalistic leader in Roskosmos.
    I am opposed to the head sociologist in the Ministry of Industry.
    I am against the Minister of Education who did not work at school for a day.
    I am against the Minister of Culture, let it go nafig.
    I am against the Minister of Health who allows a video asking for treatment of children on TV.
    I am against all the current government today.
    And I have the right to it!

    Ps
    I am for an honest investigation on the stool! And won it from helicopter engineering!
    1. unaha 12 March 2020 15: 08 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      "Putin’s direct debate live, for example with the same Platoshkin."
      ))) This is not a royal matter.
    2. Pavel Amarok 12 March 2020 15: 42 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Warrior Still Here, comrade, you have excessive egocentrism, too many "I", somehow not socialistically, the right word. I do not argue, debate is needed, moreover, without fail. On the remaining points - in principle, too. Especially about the "feldmebel".
  • rocket757 12 March 2020 14: 25 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Yes, this position in the list proposed, generally pf-e ... can also wrap up the court, constitutional.
    Although, for all creators, defining, steering and commanding, this is clearly preferable ....
    Here is the fact that those who are already NOT OUR, they can remain ad infinitum with their babosikami and other "goodies", household members. over the hill all this muddy means as a complete ZERO !!!
    Everything, more NE INTERESNO!
  • Stas-90 12 March 2020 14: 27 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    Come on, little peasants!
    Relaxed here! We are talking!
    Today, talkers, and tomorrow, why good, start to think ?!
    You yourself know what it is, but to think and decide - it will somehow sort of figure out without you who needs it!
  • Senior seaman 12 March 2020 14: 47 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    I don’t remember who said that the tragedy of Pushkin “Boris Godunov” in Russia can be read like a newspaper.
    How will it end? Learn is not surprising:
    The people will still howl and cry
    Boris frowns a little more
    What a drunkard before a glass of wine
    And finally, by her grace
    Accept the crown humbly agree;
    And there - and there he will rule us
    Still.
  • Kushka 12 March 2020 14: 49 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Somehow I listened to one analyst on TV, so he gave answers to the most
    confusing questions in the style of an arithmometer. When they objected, they say
    here it will be like our concession, he answered - it doesn’t matter to me - for me
    two criteria - a decision is productive or counterproductive.
    I will try, first against, then for, so:
    the fact that the system is tailored for one person is definitely badly counter-productive,
    the fact that there is no change of power (responsibility decreases) is counterproductive,
    the fact that the system did not grow a successor (or maybe does not want to) is counterproductive,
    the belt of benevolence towards Russia, both near and far, is already all counter-productive,
    to vote for the one who failed all their obligations is counterproductive.
    I think that's enough - it means we go and vote "productively."
    Pros: so Hurray - IT IS IMPOSSIBLE! We choose ....... and from whom? (remember what country we have!)
    Okay, we’ve passed (chosen) - and THIS is in the Duma, and there Tereshkova, Govorukhin,
    shorter than AZLK 2141 (well, KAMAZ) - is that in 2020 then? when they have Tesla, Dragon,
    We get the conflict. And you think he’ll have it with parliament like May, like Trump,
    how is natanyahu? And not afraid for the White House? I would advise, just in case, the whole
    firearm (up to the starting) in Moscow and its environs to seal. Leave only
    checkers - let them fight, if anything, fearless.
    Further ministers, further governors - as we think, will figure it out?
    Well, what do we demand from him? Immediately! Well, for example - immediately finish it
    slobbery - Crimea, Novorossiya - Kiev to take the whole question. After Kiev Minsk - him and
    you don’t have to take it - the Duma sat down and decided Russia is Great, White and Small together,
    it has been so for centuries and it should be so. Well, there’s still one who wants to wash boots in Indian
    the ocean. In general, there are many of us and all are different and you will not list?
    So what do we do — productive or counterproductive?
    1. Pavel Amarok 12 March 2020 15: 45 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Kushka (Anatoly), before embarking on New Russia, Kiev and other settlements, I think that the order should be established at home.
      1. Kushka 12 March 2020 16: 12 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        You are right (and you understood that I deliberately exaggerated, or, as it is here, at the level of delirium)
        But to think (order to establish, as you say) in a country in which oceans how many ?,
        how many seas ?, how many nations? enemies (and where without them) how many? etc. - here is the head
        need it. So the EBN (such a penny) he managed to prepare a successor and transfer power
        clean (no one even opened his nose to anyone). And tell me you didn’t guess?
        And this one, as you think - could not prepare, or didn’t want to? Here in this question and
        answer. And further Tereshkova and further in the text.
        1. Pavel Amarok 12 March 2020 16: 16 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Kushka (Anatoly), my opinion is this: regardless of who will be at the head of the regime, the system itself needs to be redone. With a bias in socialism. To sow, so to speak, rational, kind, eternal ... We have already passed this, people, in the sense, I didn’t personally, because I was born under EBN (what are his good initials).
  • Mishka78 12 March 2020 14: 52 New
    • 1
    • 7
    -6
    As an option.
    Over the next 4 years, Putin is preparing a successor, which he puts on the farm, leaving for the State Council himself.
    The State Council controls the actions of the successor president.
    This is what the last (before the proposal of the conditional Tereshkova) changes to the Constitution were about.
    Further, for example, the successor is assimilated, crawls out of the shadow of the state council and begins to pursue its own policy.
    In principle, this was the case with Putin himself, who, having acquired a new position, got out of the oligarchs and began to steer independently, and those oligarchs who did not come to terms with this know where.
    So, this same “zeroing” can serve as a restraining factor for the successor, according to which the same State Council can call early elections and the very same Putin breaks into a dashing horse. Therefore, it will be more difficult to twitch the successor.
    And if the successor continues to pursue the interests of the "family", then this item will remain unclaimed.

    Well this is so, in the order of delirium.
    1. rruvim 12 March 2020 15: 39 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      This is not nonsense. In any case: whether or not the Constitutional Court agrees to “nullify”, in any case the Foreman will be “upstairs”. Either as the Virgin President, or as the chairman of the STATE COUNCIL, as in China. Long live the monarchy! Now only the question of succession remains ...
    2. DEDPIHTO 12 March 2020 16: 09 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: Mishka78
      So, this same “zeroing” can serve as a restraining factor for the successor, according to which the same State Council can call early elections and the very same Putin breaks into a dashing horse. Therefore, it will be more difficult to twitch the successor
      Somewhere I already saw it .... lol
  • rruvim 12 March 2020 15: 32 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    More how it goes !!! It won’t go, so they kick it with kicks. Both right and left ...
  • Pavel Amarok 12 March 2020 15: 35 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Let it fail. I sat up.
  • rruvim 12 March 2020 15: 49 New
    • 0
    • 5
    -5
    Old Man with his son "climbs" everywhere. And the foreman to whom will he transfer the throne in 2036? Bastard from Kabaeva (estimated opinion)?
  • Warrior MorePhoto 12 March 2020 15: 53 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Pavel Amarok
    Warrior Still Here, comrade, you have excessive egocentrism, too many "I", somehow not socialistically, the right word. I do not argue, debate is needed, moreover, without fail. On the remaining points - in principle, too. Especially about the "feldmebel".


    “I” in the sense, and I pointed out that this is my personal opinion.
  • Warrior MorePhoto 12 March 2020 16: 02 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Mishka78
    As an option.
    Over the next 4 years, Putin is preparing a successor, which he puts on the farm, leaving for the State Council himself.
    The State Council controls the actions of the successor president.
    This is what the last (before the proposal of the conditional Tereshkova) changes to the Constitution were about.
    Further, for example, the successor is assimilated, crawls out of the shadow of the state council and begins to pursue its own policy.
    In principle, this was the case with Putin himself, who, having acquired a new position, got out of the oligarchs and began to steer independently, and those oligarchs who did not come to terms with this know where.
    So, this same “zeroing” can serve as a restraining factor for the successor, according to which the same State Council can call early elections and the very same Putin breaks into a dashing horse. Therefore, it will be more difficult to twitch the successor.
    And if the successor continues to pursue the interests of the "family", then this item will remain unclaimed.

    Well this is so, in the order of delirium.


    Quite right, I’ll add that the Federation Council has its own - Matvienko and Co., the Security Council, headed by the sidekick Medvedev, the State Council with elected friends and “your own” backbone, just in case, and it turns out in all respects a good position and defense, from the legal aspect to an accidental “puncture” "if something goes wrong. Everywhere and with cash flow, as it was before, it is only possible to increase taxes, fees, etc., because the future president does not matter, and all the "discontent" of the people can be attributed to being replaced with another controlled figure. Everything is allowed. Up to bloody reprisals against crowds of discontented. And then scold with tears.
    Darkness!
    1. rruvim 12 March 2020 16: 19 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      But there are just people. And not only the watchman with the saleswomen in the markets, which the owners replace like gloves. There are also market owners who have a headache due to the ruble collapse adventure. There are young people who are not able to dump overseas and rely on 20 million high-tech jobs. It’s already useless ... And everyone has already formed a certain opinion, which does not fit in any way with the speeches of Tereshkova and the applause of the deputies.
  • Nitarius 13 March 2020 06: 48 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    I am glad that GDP will again become President!