Nuclear-powered submarine cruiser Prince Vladimir of the Borey-A project

32

The most modern operating submarine missile carrier today is the power of the Russian Navy fleet - “Prince Vladimir” of the project “Borey-A”. This is a project submarine that has higher performance than the nuclear submarine project Vladimir Monomakh, Alexander Nevsky, and Yuri Dolgoruky.

At the moment, "Prince Vladimir" is in a floating dock and goes through the completion process. And the crew of the warship has already been formed, led by the commander of the APRK captain of the first rank Vladislav Druzhin.



The external difference of the submarine of the Borey-A project from the predecessors of the Borey project is the felling form.

According to the commander of the ship, the crew went through all the stages of testing “Prince Vladimir” over the past three years.

Vladislav Druzhin:
During this period, the ship was tested in almost all operating conditions and conditions, rocket and torpedo firing was carried out, emergency situations were worked out, with how the ship and crew react to them.


The full version is in the clip “Military Acceptance” from the TV channel “Star”:

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    12 March 2020 14: 21
    I like everything in these SSBNs, but to take the names from the ships that were ingloriously killed by Tsushima is not a good idea. Bad omen.
    The names of the old ships are passed on to inherit traditions and spirit.
    And here - see for yourself: 955 — the ancestor, the battleship “Vladimir Monomakh” was flooded by the crew, the surviving sailors were captured.
    955A: the battleship “Prince Suvorov” was sunk, the entire crew was killed,
    the battleship "Emperor Alexander III" - sunk, the entire crew died.
    According to Alexander III - I don’t understand the name at all. With the battleship - everything was clear, the father of the king who ruled then. Now why?
    1. -3
      12 March 2020 14: 31
      Mytholog (Alexey)
      According to Alexander III - I don’t understand the name at all. With the battleship - everything was clear, the father of the king who ruled then. Now why?
      Type continuity of generations. In our country, those who won in 1918 fought for the white won, that’s catching up.
      I agree with you, a reminder of Tsushima has a very bitter aftertaste.
      The only good news is that those who are preparing for the bookmark will bear the names of the Marshals of Victory, who have nothing to do with the shame of Tsushima.
      1. +4
        12 March 2020 14: 38
        Quote: Varyag_0711
        The only good news is that those who are preparing for the bookmark will bear the names of the Marshals of Victory, who have nothing to do with the shame of Tsushima.

        Again the question - both Zhukov and Rokossovsky - are marshals, not admirals.
        Of course, People with a capital letter, but to the Fleet, what side are they?
        Ushakov, Kornilov, Lazarev ... - There were many worthy Russian admirals.
        Damn him, even Admiral Kolchak would somehow understand.
        Damn, in honor of Marinesco name the submarine, in the end. Here he has a direct relationship.
        Well, it’s strange. No?
        1. -1
          12 March 2020 14: 47
          I agree, there are enough admirals of ours, as well as glorious pages like Gagnut, Grengam, Revel, Navarin, Sinop and so on.
          Damn him, even Admiral Kolchak would somehow understand.
          But this nonsense is not enough for us in the fleet. Let's not, otherwise we’ll go down to Vlasov.
          1. -3
            12 March 2020 14: 53
            Quote: Varyag_0711
            But this nonsense is not enough for us in the fleet.

            Wicked joke. But the Tsarevozhniks would have liked it. It would be a thrill to shout about his polar merits (there were, it must be recognized through gritted teeth).
            Quote: Varyag_0711
            Sinop

            In the light of leeks with Turkey, the Sinop submarine with the Caliber aboard in the Mediterranean Sea would sound very good :)
            Not a "strategist", but still ...
          2. Cat
            +4
            12 March 2020 15: 00
            It would be better named after the cities - such a tradition was in the Navy of the USSR, and in the other fleets too. It is politically neutral and residents can type to patronize.
            1. 0
              12 March 2020 15: 05
              So we have a series of Varshavyanka with the names of cities and goes.

              P.S. I don’t understand something, judging by the number of minuses, did all the bakers in the topic about the SSBN come running? Or does someone break the fifth point from the mention of Tsushima? I do not mind, minus how much will fit, just wondering why? For the love of art?
              1. Cat
                +1
                12 March 2020 15: 12
                I don’t understand something, judging by the number of minuses, did all the bakers in the topic about the SSBN come running?

                These are the minusers-wanderers, the national team of bakers and salolyubov. They jump on all branches
          3. +2
            13 March 2020 15: 20
            glorious pages
        2. -2
          12 March 2020 14: 47
          With Kolchak you went too far. Following your logic, the Vlasov Motor Rifle Division?
          1. -1
            12 March 2020 14: 57
            Quote: Gardamir
            With Kolchak you went too far. Following your logic, the Vlasov Motor Rifle Division?

            And to read the context - not fate?
            If you didn’t understand the first time, I’ll repeat it specially for you: AN EVIL JOKE.
      2. -2
        12 March 2020 15: 04
        Quote: Varyag_0711
        The only good news is that those who are preparing for the bookmark will bear the names of the Marshals of Victory

        Pasha Mercedes is worthy too? After all, the Supreme Council won, and crawled around the Shark, and even scribbled matyugs there in a magazine.
        1. +3
          12 March 2020 15: 08
          Mordvin 3 (Vladimir)
          Pasha Mercedes is worthy too? After all, the Supreme Council won, and crawled around the Shark, and even scribbled matyugs there in a magazine.
          God forbid ...! And even then, it’s not far from being marked with a drunk.
          1. +4
            12 March 2020 15: 13
            Quote: Varyag_0711
            And even then, it’s not far from being marked with a drunk.

            And the drunk is also a submariner. If in a bag he could swim out of the Moscow River. laughing Do not hit me hard ...
            1. +2
              12 March 2020 15: 19
              Mordvin 3 (Vladimir)
              And the drunk is also a submariner. If in a bag he could swim out of the Moscow River. laughing
              Yes, he was generally a "specialist" of a wide profile ... And he lay on the rails, and rode on a trolleybus, and defecated on the landing gear of an airplane, and managed to dance and conduct an orchestra. laughing
              It’s just that there was complete slag with the administration of the country, but it’s so ... little things in life, the main thing that would be like in an advertisement of a bank in the 90s.
              - and this one sang and danced, and something else ...
              - in general, our bank liked it the most ...
              That's really the Russia of the 90s, this is a country of frightened fool fool fool .
      3. -1
        13 March 2020 16: 51
        In our country, those who won in 1918 fought for the white won, that’s catching up.
        - the former KGB men and the party-Komsomol nomenclature fought for the whites? Something new.
    2. -1
      13 March 2020 16: 49
      1. "Vladimir Monomakh" is still an armored cruiser, not a battleship.
      2. All three ships fought heroically, did not lower the flag, and two died with the entire crew, as you yourself noticed. According to your logic, the names "Guarding" and "Varyag" should not be used either.
      By the way, "Admiral Ushakov" is also not good - it was sunk after all, and part of the crew was captured by the Japanese.
      3. Do not understand why, in honor of the ruler of Russia (and quite successful, it should be noted) should the ship be named?
  2. +2
    12 March 2020 14: 33
    Already wrote a lot about the high cost and problems with Ashen. Maybe it makes sense to make a multi-purpose submarine based on Borea? At 4 Ohio, the mines were not expensively turned into a launch pad for the Kyrgyz Republic. But what a unification.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +2
        12 March 2020 14: 56
        rudolf (rudolf)
        Then it would be easier to continue the series of the modernized 971th project, better than Borea.
        The 971th project is certainly outstanding, but as they wrote it was too noisy. I am not an expert, so I don’t know if this problem is treated simply by modernization or not. And then, of course, I understand the cost reduction and all that, but in my opinion the steel case is still worse than the titanium one, as in the 945 Barracudas, isn't it?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +3
          12 March 2020 16: 59
          The 971th project is certainly outstanding, but as they wrote it was too noisy.


          Normal project with normal noise. Of course, it's far from the diesel engine. Noise does not depend on the "project". It depends on the manufacturing technology. From constructive and technical measures, production culture. If the welder throws the tails of the electrodes anywhere and they rattle in the interbody space, what does the "project" have to do with it? If the shaft line is curved? If the propeller blades are not identical and poorly machined? If the bearings are rattling? Everything rests on technology and the "hands of workers". No, there will be no "noise".

          in my opinion the steel case is still worse than titanium


          To master the production of boats from titanium, "dohreneliards" rubles are needed. It is only about mastering bending, welding, building the appropriate tooling and equipment. Not taking into account the cost of the titanium itself. Very moody about the cleanliness of the seam. Cook only in a special environment. Highest qualification welders. Problematic basing due to electrochemical potential. Plavpirs eats oh-oh-oh. Of course, it is non-magnetic, the immersion depth will keep large with a similar mass with steel. But it's worth ... Those who cooked "Barracudas" are already retired at best. Technology and people are lost by age. So again all over again, again "dohreneliards".
    2. -3
      12 March 2020 14: 40
      No, the Ash project is unique in its own way, problematic like with all new equipment, childish, but solvable. As for the high cost, our oligarchs can sell their yachts and you can safely build at least two dozen Ash-trees, and they will remain in Husky. It would be the desire and will of the leadership, and finding money in the country is not a problem. Expose a couple more of Zakharchenko or the governors of Sakhalin, shake the Abramovich and Rotenbergs, in general, the choice is large, that's just who will do it in modern realities. Rather, on the contrary, some Deripaska will throw money from the budget for a new yacht.
    3. +5
      12 March 2020 14: 54
      Ash-trees cost more than Boreev for a reason. In fact, they were called upon to replace both the Anthei drums and multipurpose Pikes. That is why the Ash tree in front is a powerful sonar complex, occupying the entire nose. Therefore, the torpedo compartment is moved to the third compartment. On Boreya there is a HAC, smaller in size and weaker in capabilities. Therefore, the torpedo compartment on them is traditionally located in the first compartment. Ash trees are also made one and a half, to reduce noise. In general, it will not work to make good multi-purpose boats out of the Boreans without significant alteration and appreciation of them. Therefore, now the design of a new multi-purpose submarine Husky is ongoing.
      1. +5
        12 March 2020 16: 36
        Therefore, now the design of a new multi-purpose submarine Husky is ongoing.


        I could never understand the huge variety of nuclear submarine projects. Each time a new body is riveted. And the old one is bad? Project 971 ("Beasts") have bad contours? Yes, it seems normal. What prevents another GAK from being shoved into the same building? Nothing. Inside the "wagon and small cart" seat. Should THAT move to the middle? Embed the compartment, it's easier than designing everything from scratch. Vertical launchers? Yes, at least cut three new compartments. The living compartment and the central post did not please with what? What is bad about the turbine compartment? What does the reactor dislike? Will the tiller compartment be "super duper"?
        Cut the standard zone blocks and weld with weapons. Noisiness depends on equipment manufacturing technology, technical, organizational plan measures, and production culture. From the accuracy of the machines and the qualifications of the staff. And with us, as a new generation, everything is from scratch. And how many times does the range of spare parts increase? And how many times do you need to increase the number of service specialists? The more identical operations, the more unification and cheaper the production, the reduction in the time for maintenance and repair, docking and even easier.
        Nothing changes... .
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +4
            12 March 2020 17: 34
            on this Irtysh-Amphora

            It is clear that they wanted to remove the miners away from the antenna. They still make noise with their "bells and whistles". We had a "beast". I won't say anything about Amphora. But from experience I know that any technique is in hand .... Once a week we walked along the PKO track (emergency, only a recorder) until "the cattle were brought in." A huge complex, a bunch of racks. And operators are never radio amateurs. So the technique is technique, and the operator must also be able to operate such a colossus. Let's hope not only for good "audibility", but also for reliability and trouble-free operation.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. +2
                12 March 2020 18: 04
                What kind of parachute?


                Animal Division.
                We have heard very well. In the deep sea, I observed distant light zones. Civilians were taken at several hundred kilometers. But, naturally, the contact is "instrumental". Well, the antenna was under the apparatus. How effective the new design is, we'll see. Loading and unloading of ammunition will be no less interesting.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +2
                    12 March 2020 19: 11
                    In 97th he quit.
                    1. The comment was deleted.