Defense Ministry denies Ankara's statement on the destruction of eight "Shell" in Syria

74
Defense Ministry denies Ankara's statement on the destruction of eight "Shell" in Syria

Statement of the Turkish Ministry of Defense on the destruction in Syria by Turkish drones eight anti-aircraft missile and gun systems (ZRPK) "Pantsir-S" of the Syrian army, is not true. The Russian Ministry of Defense made such a statement on Tuesday.

The Russian military department has denied a statement by the Turkish leadership about the allegedly eight Pantsir-S air defense missile systems destroyed by Turkish UAVs in Idlib province. According to the representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the main forces and means of the Syrian air defense, including the Pantsir-S air defense missile system, are concentrated in the Damascus area. In the Syrian province of Idlib, only four complexes carried out cover for troops.



Estimates presented to the head of the Republic of Turkey on the combat effectiveness of the use of strike UAVs in the province of Idlib, allegedly able to destroy eight Syrian anti-aircraft missile-cannon systems "Shell", are untrue and are more than an exaggeration

- Said the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

According to the Russian military, as a result of massive attacks by Turkish drones, two Syria army air defense missiles received damage (not destroyed, but damaged). Currently, their recovery is coming to an end, and soon the complexes will begin to carry out combat missions.

As a result of the massive attacks of Turkish strike UAVs, two Syrian air defense missiles "Shell" were damaged. Their recovery is currently being finalized.

- specified in the ministry.

Earlier, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that Turkish drones destroyed eight Syrian army shells in Idlib.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    74 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +12
      11 March 2020 12: 40
      It is a pity that there is no video of how the carapace shoots down Turkish drones, good advertising would be
      1. -3
        11 March 2020 12: 46
        Statement by the Turkish Ministry of Defense on the destruction of Turkish drones in Syria

        Well, they announced early .. Until the video game has not been mounted.
        Eh Erdogan, well, you’ll run into soon ... bastard!
        PS The game will be called the return of Gulen to Ankara
        Bloody game is very hi
      2. +14
        11 March 2020 12: 50
        Advertising and so good! According to Turkish data, it turns out that the Four complexes located there - were destroyed TWO times! wink
        Straight Shell - Immortal (at least change the name)!
        1. +5
          11 March 2020 13: 45
          As a result of the massive attacks of Turkish strike UAVs, two Syrian air defense missiles "Shell" were damaged. Their recovery is currently being finalized.

          The picture shows Pantsir-C2, which are used only by Russia in Syria.
        2. -6
          11 March 2020 16: 45
          Quote: Hunter 2
          According to Turkish data, it turns out
      3. -4
        11 March 2020 13: 26
        So "Carapace" didn't knock down anything. At least there was information that the Turkish UAVs were shot down by the Syrian air defense systems "Tor-2ME".
        1. +4
          11 March 2020 14: 22
          This is not in nature? Syria Torah did not purchase.
          1. 0
            11 March 2020 18: 58
            You are right - I was wrong "by three" letters "Buk-M2E", but not "Tor-M2E"! fool
      4. +1
        11 March 2020 19: 35
        Quote: Prahlad
        It is a pity that there is no video of how the carapace shoots down Turkish drones, good advertising would be

        "Syrian MC claims that the success of Syria's air defense is due to the presence of Buk-M2E anti-aircraft missile systems in its arsenal."
        https://topwar.ru/168817-zrk-buk-sirijskih-pvo-uspeshno-borjutsja-s-tureckimi-bespilotnikami.html
    2. +20
      11 March 2020 12: 42
      ordinary military PR: we underestimate our losses by 10 times, we’ll overestimate our enemy’s losses by 10 times.
      1. +11
        11 March 2020 12: 46
        “They never lie as much as during the war, after the hunt, and before the election.”
        1. +3
          11 March 2020 12: 52
          When the Turkish military reported their victories to Erdogan, they exaggerated a little so that more rewards would fall on their shoulder straps and chests. lol
      2. -6
        11 March 2020 16: 46
        Quote: Ka-52
        ordinary military PR: we underestimate our losses by 10 times, we’ll overestimate our enemy’s losses by 10 times.

      3. -2
        12 March 2020 07: 15
        I don’t know how correct the infa (about the shell) is, but orders for Turkish BP have already gone, Pakistan, Tunisia have already signed up to $ 80
        1. +1
          12 March 2020 17: 20
          Quote: mammadov teymur
          ь

          there seems to be one their drone costs 30 lyamas !!! laughing
          1. -1
            14 March 2020 07: 57
            whichever is the cheapest, Bayraktar tb 2 (swarm of kamikaze doesn’t count) costs 6 (apiece, without a control station) but there are also better ones who fly a drone with jet engines approaching the stratosphere + an invisible type of the Russian Hunter
            1. +2
              14 March 2020 17: 12
              Quote: mammadov teymur
              whichever is the cheapest, Bayraktar tb 2 (swarm of kamikaze doesn’t count) costs 6 (apiece, without a control station) but there are also better ones who fly a drone with jet engines approaching the stratosphere + an invisible type of the Russian Hunter

              Well, what did they brag about then ??? what
              Quote: mammadov teymur
              already signed up for 80 million dollars

              it's just a few pieces !!! wassat
    3. +12
      11 March 2020 12: 45
      Earlier, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that Turkish drones destroyed eight Syrian army shells in Idlib.

      So the firm of Erdogan’s son-in-law produces these drones. Here he is, and praises a relative in order to make an advertisement. In order for the business to go. Someone else knows Erdogan.
      1. +1
        11 March 2020 12: 52
        finally son-in-law took up long before meeting Erdoganov’s daughter.
        Now his family ties, of course, are also a plus, but in general, sensible UAVs are riveting and quickly, in contrast to the tai state office.
        Now, in the wake of success and from the Ministry of Defense, they will throw some money and foreign buyers will stir. so you can break into the market leaders.
      2. +4
        11 March 2020 13: 07
        Bayraktar developed this industry even before he became a son-in-law. He is a very gifted person, and he is not alone, he does everything together with his brother. And in the beginning his father financed everything. (In the beginning, they even sold their house to invest in a mini workshop where they collected small flying mock-ups) They created small, but completely autonomous UAVs. He then, after all, became Erdogan’s son-in-law. At the expense of advertising, Anka-S (TAI) state, Bayraktar tv2 (Baykar) private company.
        1. +4
          11 March 2020 13: 11
          I didn’t notice that he didn’t make Anku. Now it is clear why so many "tractors" have been purchased and so few anoks. lol
          1. +6
            11 March 2020 13: 22
            So Bayraktars on this theater are more effective. Anka has a higher ceiling and a little more global goals. And if treated objectively, then the Bayraktars have done business. No matter how hard it was, the Turkish UAVs clearly showed themselves not from the worst side.
            1. +11
              11 March 2020 13: 36
              Well, do not forget that they showed themselves while the Syrians and ours did not tighten the air defense. Then their successes abruptly subsided, and the losses increased. In Libya, they are also well shot down by Emirate shells. But given that the Turkish air force has no attack aircraft and relatively few attack helicopters, Bayraktara is an inexpensive substitute for it. Moreover, it does not require complicated training of pilots and does not lead to their losses. But against a serious enemy with advanced air defense and fighter aircraft - they will end very quickly.
              In fact, this is an analogue of our corsair. Only in our army is Corsair a niche thing, and in the Turkish its role is much more serious. hi
              1. +2
                11 March 2020 15: 54
                This is still nobody Tornadoes and Points on the control points are not slaughtered. So far, only defense, but it comes to preemptive strikes
            2. -1
              12 March 2020 04: 56
              Quote: KURT330
              And if you treat objectively,

              and how to do it ??? what
              Quote: KURT330
              the Bayraktars did business.

              without an objective picture, you still concluded! wassat laughing
          2. +1
            11 March 2020 13: 31
            Anka is larger and three times more expensive, a much more serious equipment. Bayraktar is much cheaper, low cost in operation, because there are more orders.
            1. +6
              11 March 2020 13: 53
              Who buys Bayraktara? Tripoli, Turkey and Ukraine? The cost is close to the price of a helicopter, but they are of little use, and they often get them down in the same Libya. 110 km / h Bayraktara speed. A good target.
              In late May and early June 2019, a second batch arrived, probably counting eight Bayraktar TB2 UAVs, to compensate for combat losses and increase operational capabilities. In response to this, the All-Russian Union of Artists planned, and on August 15, 2019 launched a high-precision strike on the hangars of the Misrat Aviation School, which were recently built to accommodate the Bayraktarov TB2. On August 18, 2019, the All-Russian Air Force carried out additional attacks on the territory of the aerodrome, expanding their radius to destroy more new infrastructure and UAV support facilities.
              The high percentage of losses of Bayraktar TB2 UAV as a result of strikes by the All-Russian Union of Aviation and the Vin Moon II UAV resulted in the appearance of a third consignment of Bayraktarov TB2019 in Misrata at the end of August 2, delivered by Ukrainian airlines on the An-12 and IL-76TD aircraft. In total, at least 16 UAVs were delivered.

              https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3874232.html
              1. -1
                11 March 2020 16: 02
                First of all, they are ordered by the Turkish Armed Forces and the gendarmerie. They are very cheaper for their VS. Therefore, they order a lot, let them in like a black galosh. They sell abroad in three roads. Recently they opened another plant for the inlet of composite materials that are used to create the corps these drones. That is, expand production.
              2. -1
                11 March 2020 16: 09
                Bayraktars sold abroad Tripoli (? Pcs), Ukraine (6 pcs) and Qatar (12 pcs). Anka-C 2-3 days ago received an order from Tunisia, in the first batch of 6 pcs.
    4. +2
      11 March 2020 12: 50
      And there are all the numbers, from all sides it is necessary to either divide or multiply, multiple! There is nothing new in that.
      1. +3
        11 March 2020 12: 53
        the truth is somewhere in between
        1. +5
          11 March 2020 12: 58
          truth, poor, rushing somewhere nearby ... can’t stumble anywhere.
      2. +1
        12 March 2020 05: 01
        Quote: rocket757
        And there are all the numbers, from all sides it is necessary to either divide or multiply, multiple! There is nothing new in that.

        judging by the "geographical" results, the CAA bent a fart along with its official and unofficial terrorists !!! wassat soldier if we don’t seem to have objective data on the loss of manpower and equipment - !!! request
        1. +1
          12 March 2020 06: 49
          Subjective assessments are very different, but in fact, who really WANTED what and what achieved .... it is difficult to decide, because real plans and intentions can only be understood by the Syrian government - to free the territory of the state from the barmaley and not called "liberators"! There are successes, but they have been paid dearly !!! Again, a good lesson for the future. to fight with the barmaley or with the regular army is not weak, in all respects, the country has a big difference !!! soldier
          1. +2
            12 March 2020 17: 18
            Quote: rocket757
            There are successes, but paid dearly for them !!!

            it is, as it were, a subjective assessment again, because we are not in the courses on the real losses of the parties !!! request but the fact that the SAA piled on the farther and its henchmen and liberated thousands of kilometers of the Idlib territory is an objective fact !!! soldier drinks
            1. +1
              12 March 2020 17: 25
              There is no data that can be trusted without a doubt.
              1. +2
                12 March 2020 21: 25
                Quote: rocket757
                There is no data that can be trusted without a doubt.

                Nooooo ... nuuuuuuu ... in other circumstances it may be, but not when it comes from the fart !!! wassat after his statements about a couple of thousand destroyed SAA military, you start to wonder if there were any losses at the SAA !!! request
                1. +1
                  12 March 2020 21: 35
                  Our Defense Ministry is nevertheless drawn into the conflict by the very, most quick way, you have to work and keep a mark of objectivity ..... you have forgotten how to do it, and politicians are trying to steer, tf-u.
    5. 0
      11 March 2020 12: 54
      Earlier, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that Turkish drones destroyed eight Syrian army shells in Idlib.

      Something modest, however ...
    6. +2
      11 March 2020 12: 57
      And leather jackets !!!!! Also three !!!!!
    7. -16
      11 March 2020 13: 02
      Here the question is bluntly - are they definitely Syrian "Shells" or are they ours, Russian? Because if ours is the fact of the beginning of a war against Russia, and the country is obliged to inflict a powerful missile and bomb strike on Turkey, as a preventive measure of counteraction, in response to the same aggressive Turkish actions against our military personnel.
      1. -2
        11 March 2020 13: 40
        Syrian?)) Does Assad have air defense?
        1. +4
          11 March 2020 13: 56
          Oddly enough, in 2011 they also bought Buk-M2E.
          According to the representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the main forces and means of the Syrian air defense, including the Pantsir-S air defense missile system, are concentrated in the Damascus region. In the Syrian province of Idlib, the troops were covered by only four complexes.
        2. +5
          11 March 2020 14: 25
          36 shells, under contract, were delivered to Syria.
      2. -7
        11 March 2020 14: 17
        Thrifty, do you want to deprive us of our legal "all inclusive" by the summer? The people will not understand.
    8. -11
      11 March 2020 13: 03
      The bottom line is that even the janissaries have shock drones. And the videoconferencing systems do not have them close and in the near future they will not predict. All these "hunters" are still only PR, like petrels, poseidons, etc. Fact !!!
      1. +12
        11 March 2020 13: 10
        Quote: alex aircraft
        The bottom line is that even the janissaries have shock drones. And the videoconferencing systems do not have them close and in the near future they will not predict. All these "hunters" are still only PR, like petrels, poseidons, etc. Fact !!!

        No, no, sleep well, we have nothing, what’s there, a gas station and that’s all! lol
        1. mvg
          -1
          11 March 2020 19: 35
          sleep well

          https://aviation21.ru/tag/bpla/
          Here is a link for you, look at the dates of acceptance for armament / testing of UAVs. Expand and decide how many UAV units can be in service. Plus drug training. Well, go to bed already if the lessons are done.
          1. +2
            11 March 2020 19: 45
            Quote: mvg
            sleep well

            https://aviation21.ru/tag/bpla/
            Here is a link for you, look at the dates of acceptance for armament / testing of UAVs. Expand and decide how many UAV units can be in service. Plus drug training. Well, go to bed already if the lessons are done.

            Found an authoritative publication! lol Shchas MO RF will reveal to you the number of standing in service and types of UAVs. I did my last lessons about 30 years ago. hi And in Syria, we take drones from Ukraine as a loan to fly.
    9. -8
      11 March 2020 13: 09
      Should this be understood as an average correction for the results of the operation?
      That is, we introduce a reduction factor 4 (8/2 = 4) for all results.
      Then 20 downed drones turn into 20/4 = 5
      Perhaps these figures are closer to the truth?
      1. +3
        11 March 2020 13: 43
        The Turks lost 8 UAVs, this information is in the public domain. 6 of them fell in the territory controlled by them, 2 - in the territory controlled by government forces.
        1. +3
          11 March 2020 14: 05
          Turkey recognized the loss of 12 UAVs. The destruction of 6 Anka-S and 7 Bayraktar was confirmed. (photo and video), but most of the downed UAVs fell on the territory not controlled by the SAA. By the way the other day, another Bayraktar fell on the Syrian-Turkish border. Turkish media wrote about this, allegedly for technical reasons.
          1. +1
            11 March 2020 14: 58
            He fell at Batman Merkez. Find it on google map. wink


            In a straight line to the battlefield - 450km. To the Syrian border 100km. To Iraqi 150.
    10. -5
      11 March 2020 13: 36
      If the Turks knocked out the shell, then these air defense systems and, in general, Syrian air defense, does not pose any danger to the United States.
      1. 0
        11 March 2020 13: 38
        Quote: abror
        If the Turks knocked out the shell, then these air defense systems and, in general, Syrian air defense, does not pose any danger to the United States.

        And then why are the states so worried about the s-400?
        1. -1
          11 March 2020 14: 06
          Quote: neri73-r
          Quote: abror
          If the Turks knocked out the shell, then these air defense systems and, in general, Syrian air defense, does not pose any danger to the United States.

          And then why are the states so worried about the s-400?

          For them, the Turkish S-400 will work if that.
      2. +1
        11 March 2020 14: 28
        Quote: abror
        If the Turks knocked out the shell

        Yeah, as many as eight out of four.
        1. -2
          11 March 2020 19: 18
          Yeah, as many as eight out of four.

          How do you know how many were there
          1. +2
            11 March 2020 19: 25
            Quote: Santa Fe
            How do you know how many were there

            I read in the article.
            According to the representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the main forces and means of the Syrian air defense, including the Pantsir-S air defense missile system, are concentrated in the Damascus region. In the Syrian province of Idlib, only four complex.
            1. -2
              11 March 2020 19: 42
              Now, after the battle, the MO can write anything. What complexes there were three. Or five

              According to official figures, 36 Shells were delivered to Syria. Could they all die in a couple of years under the blows of the Israeli air force
              1. -1
                11 March 2020 20: 02
                Quote: Santa Fe
                Now, after the battle, the MO can write anything.

                But, you must admit, I didn’t invent anything. Used data from official sources. Therefore, it is not necessary to ask questions with such sarcasm. hi
                1. -3
                  11 March 2020 20: 09
                  Critical thinking is given to a person to analyze the situation from various sources, often contradictory

                  Statements that there were only 4 Shells from an interested group of persons (MO) do not cause any confidence

                  And you immediately categorically took it on faith

                  Закон Lawfulness of justice. And the official source does not mean that he is telling the truth. ”
                  1. +2
                    12 March 2020 09: 59
                    And Recep Erdogan is not an interested person? Or Turkish MO with its thousands of killed SA soldiers, hundreds of tanks and self-propelled guns? So it is not known who is more interested
              2. +2
                12 March 2020 09: 50
                Of course. But the same source claims that most of the BM was in the Damascus region, which, in general, is logical. And the shell in its current form is not at all air defense
                1. +3
                  12 March 2020 10: 43
                  How quickly set minus wassat But it would be better if Mr. Minusovatel came out of the shadow about told what exactly seems to him wrong.
      3. 0
        11 March 2020 14: 28
        If the Turks knocked out the shell, then these air defense systems and, in general, Syrian air defense, does not pose any danger to the United States.
        -------------------------------------------
        More than a controversial statement. The same shell could be damaged by shell fragments. But this does not mean that he is not able to bring down anything. What, in fact, happened in Syria and Libya (and not only)
    11. +1
      11 March 2020 16: 12
      Strange differences, however. Cause only a smile. Definitely not 8 recoverable. . What, a bit too much or for this they remove the prizes ... It is not clear. The word of one MO against another.
    12. +1
      11 March 2020 16: 22
      Quote: Tonya
      “They never lie as much as during the war, after the hunt, and before the election.”

      forgot about fishing.
    13. 0
      11 March 2020 18: 16
      https://twitter.com/i/status/1237728014936543233
    14. 0
      11 March 2020 19: 15
      Defense Ministry denies Ankara's statement on the destruction of eight "Shell" in Syria

      Since the Ministry of Defense has denied it, it means that it was so, the Turks destroyed several Armor

      “Never believe the rumors - wait for the official refutation” (a joke of the Soviet period)
    15. -1
      11 March 2020 23: 51
      They laughed ... we don’t have anything .... all the armor is destroyed .... everything is bad ........ a kick from the idlib and Libya ..... the Turks have no chance ...
    16. -1
      12 March 2020 01: 35
      ))) Oh, this is the Ministry of Defense of Russia, reminds the words of Bunsch from the movie Ivan Vasilyevich changes his profession: They didn't detain, they did not detain, I came to you myself !! ")))
    17. -1
      12 March 2020 10: 57
      Well done! I would even applaud if it were a theater.
    18. 0
      12 March 2020 11: 06
      In the war everyone lies, how many destroyed so many show.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"