Let's talk about science: Scientists have discovered "quantum entanglement" in ferromagnets

Let's talk about science: Scientists have discovered "quantum entanglement" in ferromagnets

In the section “Let's talk about science” today we discuss new data obtained by scientists when studying the behavior of electrons in ferromagnets. Ferromagnets are materials that are magnetized in the absence of an external magnetic field. They remain magnetized at a temperature below a singular point — the Curie point. Ferromagnets include metals such as iron, nickel, cobalt, dysprosium, gadolinium, and some others, as well as some compounds (including compounds based on iron, nickel, zinc, etc.).


The results of a new study published by scientists from the Rutgers (Rutgers) University of the United States. The studies were carried out together with scientists from Germany and China.

It was previously noted that the electrons in ferromagnets are oriented in a strictly defined way and do not reside in the so-called entangled states. Physicists at Rutgers University have discovered the presence of a large number of electrons, which have the same "quantum entanglement" - are interdependent. Even the electrons located at a relatively large distance from each other turned out to be connected with each other - the quantum state of one affects the quantum state of the other, and this connection manifests itself instantly.

Earlier, nothing similar was observed in ferromagnets.

Professor Coleman, co-author of the work on the study of ferromagnets, notes that "the discovery allows us to understand the principles of superconductors, which are such at ordinary (" room ") temperature."

Coleman:

If we learn to determine the principles of quantum entanglement in matter and manage the many-particle quantum entanglement, we can create new variants of matter that are useful for the world of technology. For example, we can talk about quantum computers.

Scientists from Rutgers University with their German and Chinese colleagues note that they are proposing a new theory for a family of iron-based superconductors.

If we talk about the theory and interpretation of quantum entanglement, then so far even among scientists there is no single approach and explanation. Moreover, the possibility of using this property is often said.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. aszzz888 10 March 2020 11: 15 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    With all due respect to VO ... but maybe such topics are more suitable for a specialized site? request
    1. Svarog 10 March 2020 11: 30 New
      • 20
      • 6
      +14
      Quote: aszzz888
      With all due respect to VO ... but maybe such topics are more suitable for a specialized site? request

      The section is interesting. Although often not everything is clear, but the essence is clear. The most interesting thing is that the further science moves forward, the more questions arise.
      1. aszzz888 10 March 2020 11: 33 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Svarog (Vladimir) Today, 11: 30 NEW
        0
        Quote: aszzz888
        With all due respect to VO ... but maybe such topics are more suitable for a specialized site? request

        The section is interesting ....
        Then let's talk.
        What is it that has become known to our learned physicists under the name "quantum entanglement"? They say that in this effect even information is transmitted at a speed exceeding the speed of light. But in previous articles we talked about the fact that the sum of the five material potentials of our world cannot exceed the value equal to the square of the speed of light.
        How do you look at it?
        1. Svarog 10 March 2020 11: 38 New
          • 13
          • 5
          +8
          Quote: aszzz888
          They say that in this effect even information is transmitted at a speed exceeding the speed of light

          Indeed, at the quantum level, there is a lot of surprising things, and indeed information is transmitted above the speed of light, I also know that the behavior of particles depends on the observer. This is where my understanding ends, but it’s interesting))
          But in previous articles we talked about the fact that the sum of the five material potentials of our world cannot exceed the value equal to the square of the speed of light.
          How do you look at it?

          It’s clear that this is sarcasm ..
          1. Obliterator 10 March 2020 13: 50 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Svarog
            I also know that the behavior of particles depends on the observer.

            Not because the observer is watching, but because he is simply present.
            1. Yegorchik 10 March 2020 14: 55 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Obliterator
              Quote: Svarog
              I also know that the behavior of particles depends on the observer.

              Not because the observer is watching, but because he is simply present.

              No, it observes, in the experiment of a quantum eraser with a delayed choice, the results were recorded, but to read the result or to erase the decision was made after one of the entangled particles (the one that passes through the slits) interferes (or does not interfere).
        2. orionvitt 10 March 2020 15: 40 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: aszzz888
          How do you look at it?

          The only thing that became clear from the article is the complete confusion in the minds on the issue of quantum mechanics. and expressed in a nutshell
          until now, even among scientists there is no single approach and explanation
          So everything is very clear laughing
          1. Polymer 10 March 2020 17: 59 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            The first reaction to the "news" is confusion in the brains of these scientists. It may even be quantum, but it seems to me the most common.
        3. lis-ik 10 March 2020 17: 45 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Particles really interact instantly; restrictions on the speed of light are not an obstacle for them. Today's quantum physics answers this question quite gracefully. There is an instant connection between the particles, not because the information is quickly transmitted, but because at a deeper level they are simply not separated, but still located together. They are located in the so-called quantum entanglement. Today's knowledge in quantum physics comes down to one thing: There is a deeper unmanifest reality. And what we observe as a familiar world is only a small part of a more fundamental quantum reality. In this sense, some theories on the virtuality of our world, etc. are explained.
          1. gohomeyanki 11 March 2020 01: 18 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Instantly they are not equal to the speed of light. For the rest, too, your level of reasoning is 3rd grade school.
            But here you should not be upset, scientists have not gone far, they also understand little. In the amount of knowledge, more than yours, but also their knowledge of the universe is miserable, and not a fact that they can understand at all, but that's another story.
            1. Ingvar 72 11 March 2020 16: 44 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: gohomeyanki
              In the amount of knowledge, more than yours, but also their knowledge of the universe is scanty minded,

              Are you able to enlighten at a higher level of knowledge?
      2. Insurgent 10 March 2020 12: 29 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Quote: Svarog
        The most interesting thing is that the further science moves forward, the more questions arise.

        Do you get it all down to this?

      3. fif21 10 March 2020 15: 22 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Svarog
        The section is interesting.

        The result of the publication of the article is that the CIA sent 2 analysts to the CIA, MI-6 lost 1 employee. China, Huawei Corporation is looking for materials that have sold the Russian Federation on the superconductivity of materials, while other Western intelligence services do not know about other losses. What’s interesting, analyst Mosad joined reaction of humor. And we dear forum users have only one thing left - to congratulate Sasha Chernov on the assignment of an extraordinary rank! bully
    2. voyaka uh 10 March 2020 11: 43 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      So far, little is said about military quanta ... everything is classified. bully
      But infa leaked from the Liver Laboratory in Liverball USA, that they are of unusual camouflage color and fly in formation. yes
      1. bessmertniy 10 March 2020 11: 49 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        We fly when we are unraveled. what But sometimes they fly with a wedge. : repeat If you understand the team correctly. lol
        1. voyaka uh 10 March 2020 12: 04 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          A wedge - so far only to the south.
          But scientists are working on it. wink
      2. loki565 10 March 2020 12: 01 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Yeah interesting conversation comes out)))
    3. gridasov 10 March 2020 12: 31 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Without a doubt ! And similar to the sites of storytellers and visionaries. It’s like in a joke. English scientists have deeply studied sunshine - beautiful!
    4. Sharky 10 March 2020 12: 53 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      but maybe such topics are more suitable for a specialized site?

      No, such topics, I think, are very important at VO. Since the creation of weapons is always based on the latest achievements of science.
      It is quantum entanglement that is one of the proofs that we live in a virtual World.
      1. Mikhail m 10 March 2020 13: 15 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Sharky
        It is quantum entanglement that is one of the proofs that we live in a virtual World.

        How exactly is the evidence? More? Well, about other evidence, since it was all about that.
        1. Sharky 10 March 2020 21: 19 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          How exactly is the evidence? More? Well, about other evidence, since it was all about that.

          Yes, of course, this is not secret information, the Internet is full of articles and videos on this topic. I would recommend that you read this article:
          http://historylost.ru/2017/03/12/proof-of-virtuality/
          And I can recommend the channel of Dmitry Pobedinsky. The young physicist talks about the complex in a simple way.
          https://www.youtube.com/user/PhysFromPobed

          And if it’s interesting to go deep, then download the books of L. B. Okun: Physics of elementary particles and Leptons and Quarks ...
          Then by yourself drinks
    5. Polymer 10 March 2020 18: 06 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yes, a normal topic. The contractor only needs to be changed.
    6. Azazelo 16 March 2020 14: 01 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Anyway, the article is about nothing .... I thought right now something was read to me that was informative, and here again American scientists, Chinese scientists .... as they proved they got, which of this conclusion .... FUFFLO
  2. voyaka uh 10 March 2020 11: 16 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    There are many interesting experiments in quantum physics.
    They created "artificial atoms" - with more electrons than physics and chemistry allow. An atom in an artificial trap from other atoms.
    And it becomes possible to confuse these extra electrons, disconnect them over long distances and establish a quantum connection between them.
    1. aszzz888 10 March 2020 11: 23 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      voyaka uh (Alexey) Today, 11: 16 NEW
      +1
      There are many interesting experiments in quantum physics.
      And on the topic? Or pour some water, if only to be noted?
      1. voyaka uh 10 March 2020 11: 30 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        Strictly on the topic.
        The topic of the article is new advances in quantum physics. smile
        1. aszzz888 10 March 2020 11: 37 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          voyaka uh (Alexey) Today, 11: 30
          And if you do not get off the question, but on the topic
          electron behavior in ferromagnets.
          ? I said that you are your post
          There are many interesting experiments in quantum physics.
          this is ordinary la la.
          1. voyaka uh 10 March 2020 11: 50 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            I talked about a specific interesting experiment. Those who are interested in this topic.
        2. Crimean partisan 1974 10 March 2020 13: 51 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          The topic of the article is new achievements in quantum physics .... it’s not clear what the achievement is, then. chatter about anything. From the first, quantists need to deal with the elementary particles themselves. they accumulated during the research, as in the San Diego Zoo, and then deal with intricacies (or confusion). yes by the way, so what is there with the Higgs boson. found chi not ???
          1. Polymer 10 March 2020 18: 04 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
            so what is there with the Higgs boson. found chi not ???

            At first they thought that they had found, then again they lost ... while they stopped at the high-likly. request
            1. Crimean partisan 1974 10 March 2020 19: 41 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              while stopped at the high-likly. ....... that is, from the theory of probability of complete obvious involvement ... well, along the way it is very expensive to look for a black cat in a dark room especially when she is not there ... in short Malevich’s picture even with CERN even without
    2. astepanov 10 March 2020 14: 48 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      They created "artificial atoms" - with more electrons than physics and chemistry allow.

      One of two things: either created because chemistry and physics allow, or did not create at all.
      Quote: voyaka uh
      And it becomes possible to confuse these extra electrons, disconnect them over long distances and establish a quantum connection between them.

      Why are you even talking about something that you clearly don’t understand?
      Quote: Svarog
      and indeed information is transmitted above the speed of light

      Nothing like this. The presence of quantum entanglement does not contradict SRT, and it is impossible to betray any information faster than the speed of light, as before.
    3. nikon7717 11 March 2020 08: 43 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      More or less number of electrons in an atom is possible, this is called an ion, but try to create the same element with a different number of protons! This does not happen, you can change oam, get isotopes due to neutrons.
  3. knn54 10 March 2020 11: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    We are waiting for the quantum "revolution" ...
    1. voyaka uh 10 March 2020 11: 33 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      He’ll come ... So far, the quantum transistor is the size of a small suitcase. But the first computers were hefty cabinets. fellow
      1. aszzz888 10 March 2020 11: 52 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        voyaka uh (Alexey) Today, 11: 33 NEW
        -1
        Will come ... So far, the quantum transistor - the size of a small suitcase

        And again by.

        Quantum devices
        radioprog.ru ›post / 154
        When silicon transistors are reduced in size, leakage increases ... Quantum Dot Transistor: A quantum dot capable of holding a charge and surrounded by a thin tunnel barrier replaces the gate of a conventional

        ru.wikipedia.org ›Single-electron transistor
        Single-electron transistor (SET) - the concept of a transistor that uses the ability to produce noticeable voltage changes when manipulating individual electrons.
        At the University of Berkeley created a transistor the size of ...
        habr.com ›post / 369753 /
        It is believed that due to quantum limitations, the silicon shutter size transistor can not be less than 5 nm.
        1. voyaka uh 10 March 2020 12: 02 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          silicon gate transistor ///
          ---
          The keyword is "shutter". But the transistor itself is a whole device for now.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Horon 10 March 2020 11: 40 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    In the quantum world, one cannot recognize the previous state of a particle without changing it. Accordingly, it is not clear how the quantum "twins" were determined, how was it determined that this was the exact pair? It seems that Mavrodi from science is doing this, they talk a lot about a breakthrough in science, but as soon as you try to squeeze them with the possibility of real application, then there comes a "quantum entanglement" in their practicality. Recall at least the “creation” of a quantum computer which was supposed to be “well, really!”, But in fact it turned out to be a very gray device in terms of performance, but with a large consumption and size. In terms of productivity, he barely reaches the performance of an ordinary personnel! what
    1. voyaka uh 10 March 2020 11: 59 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      You are several lagging behind in this thread.

      "Accordingly, it is not clear how the quantum" twins "were identified, how was it determined that this was the exact pair?" ///
      ---
      Pairs are very accurate. And entangled particles (usually photons) are bred through optical fibers (Swiss) or in space (Chinese).
      Leaders in quantum communication: Chinese and Swiss. In quantum computers: Americans, Canadians.
      The "applied" quantum physics in Germany and Israel is highly developed.
      ----
      Quantum computers are on sale. Launches Canadian firm D-Wave. Sold a few pieces. Bought Google, Lockheed, and the state laboratory in the USA.
      Performance in some specialized calculations is millions of times higher than that of cluster super-computers.
      1. Horon 10 March 2020 12: 34 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        You only repeated to me what is already flickering in the press. I'm talking about real opportunities. When you dig deep into it, it quickly becomes clear that there are no joins between those written in advertising articles and the basic principles of quantum mechanics, one of which is quantum uncertainty. About
        millions of times higher than cluster super-computers.

        These are only initial theoretical calculations that have not been confirmed by real possibilities. With significant dimensions and a significantly larger number of qubits than originally thought, these computers could not show outstanding parameters.
        entangled particles (usually photons) are propagated along optical fibers (Swiss) or in space (Chinese).

        I read, I read. He also rejoiced at first, but re-read it thoroughly and dug up so many contradictions there that he was suspected of a fraud from science. So far this feeling has only been confirmed. It's not easy to write about quantum uncertainty, I have not yet heard that humanity has learned to distinguish photons from each other without changing their state! Even with the determination of the electron’s position there are big problems, and it’s like a bigger photon both in mass and magnitude, and then ...
        1. voyaka uh 10 March 2020 12: 41 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          In New York, in the second half of the 19th century, police arrested two blatant scammers. They stood 100 meters apart and claimed that they were talking on a rope, holding two round membranes in their hands!
          They fooled honest citizens.
          It was Alexander Bell with an assistant.
          1. Horon 10 March 2020 13: 44 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Nobody is arrested by Copperfield, although he even “teleports” the statue of liberty. The difference between some scientists and Copperfield is only in the recognition of the latter as an illusionist.
  6. Campanella 10 March 2020 11: 58 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Ferromagnets are physical communism on the one hand and capitalism on the other. I find parallels with the structure of human society.
    In general, a person’s level of understanding of the essence in which he lives is close to "0". Alas. There is no limit of knowledge, probably because the number of dimensions is clearly greater than five and seven ....
  7. Mikhail3 10 March 2020 12: 26 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    That is, now we can still create quantum computers? Who have already created? Or did not create? Hehe ...
    1. Aag
      Aag 10 March 2020 14: 04 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I remember, some time ago, someone from the blue screen stated that in this area we can become leaders. We also talked about computer technology on neurons ...
  8. Operator 10 March 2020 14: 04 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    We are talking about the development of yet another element base for a quantum computer (it performs any computing tasks based on the instantaneous reaction of quantum entanglement). The power of a quantum computer is determined by the number of its computing elements - qubits. Now the world record of one assembly of a quantum computer is about 16 qubits. Practical computing tasks such as breaking any cipher with a key shorter than the ciphertext can be performed during the assembly of 64 or more qubits.

    So far, assemblies of more than 16 qubits are scattered in the information sense.

    It is believed that only a quantum computer with a sufficiently large number of qubits can become the material basis for artificial intelligence in connection with its record computing power.
  9. sleeve 10 March 2020 15: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I had an interesting case of communication about superlight speeds. One egghead asked me a question: if you connect a million km wire through an open network with sufficient voltage and power, how much current will be restored in the network? I said 3 seconds. He replied: instantly. Well, I advised you to think about it.
    1. srha 10 March 2020 21: 24 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      He lied. See, well, at least ..., about: via Google - "The speed of electric current" School for an electrician. "
      It would be instantaneous, there would be neither an oscillatory circuit, nor a radio, nor an Internet, And, yes, when turned on, the bulbs would not light so often due to transients.
  10. Shahno 10 March 2020 17: 51 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: lis-ik
    Particles really interact instantly; restrictions on the speed of light are not an obstacle for them. Today's quantum physics answers this question quite gracefully. There is an instant connection between the particles, not because the information is quickly transmitted, but because at a deeper level they are simply not separated, but still located together. They are located in the so-called quantum entanglement. Today's knowledge in quantum physics comes down to one thing: There is a deeper unmanifest reality. And what we observe as a familiar world is only a small part of a more fundamental quantum reality. In this sense, some theories on the virtuality of our world, etc. are explained.

    Mathematics, in any case, is a factor that measures our emotions. Because she gives an answer regardless of emotions.
    Free translation..
  11. Igoresha 10 March 2020 21: 42 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Nitsche is not clear about what the article and even the title is a fat minus!
  12. KVIRTU 10 March 2020 22: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It seems not April 1 ... that means a test of such forum participants. What quanta and photons can be in the core of the transformer of any switching power supply, which is ferromagnetic.
  13. PValery53 11 March 2020 01: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "The more we learn the world, the more the boundaries of the unknown are marked ..."