Taliban refuted US intelligence statement on unwillingness to fulfill peace treaty

The Afghan Taliban movement (banned in Russia) has denied a statement by the American intelligence about the alleged refusal to implement the peace agreement signed with the United States.

Sukhail Shahin, spokesman for the Qatar political bureau in the movement, said the Taliban did not intend to violate the agreement and would stick to the agreements. At the same time, he called the statement of the US special services "untruth."

A statement by American intelligence (...) that the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (Taliban - approx. BO) intends to violate the agreement is not true, and we completely refute this statement

- He said, adding that the implementation of the agreement is "satisfactory pace."

Recall that on February 29, the Taliban and the United States signed a peace agreement that obliges the United States to withdraw its military contingent from Afghanistan within 14 months, and the Taliban to break all ties with al-Qaeda and begin inter-Afghan negotiations with the government.

The parties agreed that in order to create an atmosphere of trust before the start of negotiations between the Taliban and the government of Afghanistan, the country's authorities will release 5 detained supporters of the movement from prison, and the Taliban - 1 government. However, the Afghan authorities refused to release the Taliban, saying that the issue of their release is not the responsibility of the United States.

In turn, the Taliban said they did not recognize the Afghan authorities, and the agreement on the release was signed with the United States.

Meanwhile, the parties are ready to start negotiations after the release of their supporters.

Comments

[Insurgent]

Taliban refuted US intelligence statement on unwillingness to fulfill peace treaty

And these "guys" (Taliban) will not tolerate idle chatter in their direction.

Someone, apparently, "For the market", will have to answer ...

[Same lech]

The stump is clear ... the Americans are cheating again ... they themselves violate all the agreements and want to blame the Taliban for it ... well, swindlers ... scammers ... scammers ... I am very angry at the US State Department for their constant nasty things not only in relation to Russia but the whole world.
Because of them, wars and the deaths of thousands of people are constantly taking place in the world.

[bessmertniy]

Vrrbsche something, it is not clear with the exchange. It turns out that Trump signed an agreement with the Taliban behind the back of the legitimate government of Afghanistan. How did it happen that the Americans signed up to what is not in their competence? Could it be that the American military will generally be sent to release the Taliban from Afghan prisons !?

[Dmitry Donskoy]

But what is not clear here? They generally appointed the president in Venezuela, but then the authorities simply did not call for conspiracy with the Basmachi. The mattresses in the blood do everything their own way.

[maidan.izrailovich]

bessmertniy (Victor)
Could it be that the American military will generally be sent to release the Taliban from Afghan prisons !?

It is possible that you are not far from the truth.
Judge for yourself. The ISIS project stalled. Next is plan "B". The Taliban is coming to power. Only this time the USA is among his friends. Further spread of influence on the countries of Central Asia. Naturally, with the change of modes in the latter. Well, there is goal number 1. A large and rebellious country in the north.
If this logical chain begins to be realized, then I hope our Foreign Ministry and the Ministry of Defense will be able to intercept this process.

[Valery Valery]

In the United States since Kennedy, powerful political structures (for example, the CIA, the FBI, etc.) can, almost without concealment, oppose the central government.
So now, Trump wants to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, and the Pentagon is trying to continue this war.

[Sarmat Sanych]

The United States has intelligence that the Taliban made a deal to get the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan, and when it is completed they will hit the government. That is, America is outraged that they are treating her the way it is used to with everyone, always and everywhere. It’s ridiculous.

[Victor_B]

Well, on the other hand, the Taliban are tribal associations without strict centralization.
Therefore, each tribal leader owns a bicycle.
The top leaders write some kind of agreement, but on the ground they decide what to execute and what not.

[Same lech]

Actually, the Americans are occupiers in Afghanistan ... and the Afghans themselves must solve their internal problems ... without the participation of these democratizers.

[Victor_B]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Actually, the Americans are occupiers in Afghanistan ...

Interestingly, besides the Americans and the stubborn, does anyone on the planet consider their stay in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria legal?

[Insurgent]

Quote: Victor_B

Well, on the other hand, the Taliban are tribal associations without strict centralization.
Therefore, each tribal leader owns a bicycle.

Calmly when they need it, they unite in the "Bicycle Troops" ...
From the experience of the war in Afghanistan during the USSR period, we have seen this. Although there was still no Taliban movement at that time, the then dekhane-spirits are in fact the "flock" and Taliban fighters ...

[Vitaly Tsymbal]

When OKSVA was in Afghanistan, then in those days the spirits could not unite ... either their Islam is different, then their nationality or tribe is different, then the "West Arab friends" gave one more money to another less ... there appeared "friendly gangs" who came running to us - shuravi and asked for help to "beat up" a neighbor. There has never been a unity of peoples in Afghanistan, as in the USSR during the Second World War, and is unlikely to appear in the near future. This is what the Americans are using.

[Insurgent]

Quote: Vitaly Tsymbal

When OKSVA was in Afghanistan, then in those days the spirits could not unite ... then their Islam is different, then their nationality or tribe is different

Under the leadership of "Lev Pajsher", Ahmad Shah Massoud, in 1996 there were up to 60 bayonets ...

What is this if not a union?

Approximate data on the number of fighters of Ahmad Shah by year:

1980 - less than 1000
1981 - 2200
1984 - 5000
1989 - 13 000
1996 - 60 000

[spech]

Maybe someone threw a money, so "the donkey loaded with gold opened the gates"

[Vitaly Tsymbal]

I want to remind you that we left Afghanistan in 1989. Even 13 thousand fighters at AS Masud’s figure is too high, because farther than the Panjshir Gorge, this warlord did not have power, and indeed
he himself is not a Pashtun, but a Tajik. He never found a common language either with the Pashtuns or with other peoples ... The "heroism" of this field commander was "exaggerated" by our military, who mainly participated in the Panjshir operations ... In fact, Masud was one of the 20-30 famous field commander, who constantly "shook off" the Soviet army. Ours seized the patrimony of Masud, but then handed it over to the Afghans, and they "poured" it to Masud. Well, 60 thousand soldiers of Massoud are the forces of the Northern Alliance, which, under the leadership of Massoud, lost the war to the Taliban.

[Insurgent]

Quote: Vitaly Tsymbal

60 thousand soldiers of Masoud are the forces of the Northern Alliance which, under the leadership of Masoud, lost the war to the Taliban

Dead Masood, leading the forces of the Northern Alliance (all the same, alliances?), Lost the war to the Taliban ...

How can I "digest" this?

[Vitaly Tsymbal]

The human brain is designed to receive, accumulate and store INFORMATION, the stomach is responsible for digestion.
Dear Insurgent, open even such an ambiguous publication as Wikipedia and there you can read the following:

After the Taliban seized central power in Afghanistan in 1996, Masudistan revived and became part of the Northern Alliance, which was led by Masoud.

But a wiki is not a reliable source of information, so check with other sources ...
I repeat Masud - the field commander of the Tajiks (and even then not all). In the Northern Alliance, in addition to the Tajiks, there were about the same number of Uzbeks, Hazaras and other ethnic groups who were against the Pashtuns. Massoud did not have a single victory over the Soviet troops (as well as other field commanders). Up to 2 thousand Soviet soldiers usually took part against the "Masud soldiers" in thousands, who dispersed the Masud gangs through the caves and Pakistani spiritual camps.

[Prisoner]

Being an enemy of mattresses is calmer than being their friends. It would be better if they continued to falsify them, you see they would have washed off.

[Insurgent]

Quote: Captive

Being an enemy of mattresses is calmer than being their friends. It would be better if they continued to falsify them, you see they would have washed off.

The Americans want to leave without losses, "saving face", and not to stumble away, as from Vietnam.

For this reason, and bargaining.

[Prisoner]

If we proceed from the mentality of the bearded, then they so easily will not refuse to break the farewell pendel to those who leave. Ours, in the process of withdrawing the contingent, in order to cool the hot heads of the spirits, had to make several demonstration volleys with a pair of "Buratin". Impressed. This will be more difficult. It will be necessary to take off. And on takeoffs, anything can happen.

[knn54]

Afghan men simply "celebrated" the conclusion of an agreement between the US and the Taliban.

[Thrifty]

All this is the semblance of imitation of compliance with certain "agreements" that are not worth the paper on which they were printed! Only the elimination of the Taliban, and the withdrawal of ALL the military, primarily the American from Afghanistan, can end the long-term civil war, but this scenario
from the category of fiction.

[Jack O'Neill]

Taliban refuted US intelligence statement on unwillingness to fulfill peace treaty

Well, yes, yes, only two American turntables shot down, one of which included the presidents of the United States and Afghanistan.

[Nikolai Petrov]

What kind of agreements can be with "exclusive"? Well, we agreed, the next day the striped ones threw bombs on the contractual side. The Taliban responded. Nothing new.

[businessv]

commits the United States to withdraw its military contingent from Afghanistan within 14 months, and the Taliban to sever all ties with al-Qaeda and begin inter-Afghan negotiations with the country's government.

Is this the same al-Qaeda that the minke whales founded? Why are they now making the Taliban tear them? Native children of bitch! Your affairs are wonderful, exporter of democracy!

[Ros 56]

They all stand each other there, they all lack faith from the word at all.

[Volgar]

Meanwhile, the parties are ready to start negotiations after the release of their supporters.

Inter-Afghan negotiations will not lead to any major changes within the country. The opposing sides have too different views. The Afghan government looks west and depends on the west. The Taliban in the controlled territories are introducing Sharia standards, the implementation of which is strictly controlled. It will not work to reach any agreements in the inter-Afghan negotiations.

[sanik2020]

Hollywood always says that the United States does not talk with terrorists. So now the Taliban are not terrorists? Then let them both go to court and there they prove who does not comply.