Syrian Defense Ministry showed a video of targeted airstrikes on militants

75

In the battles of Sarakib in Idlib province, more than six thousand militants of the Jebhat al-Nusra group, banned in Russia, were eliminated. This was reported by Syrian state television. In addition to significant losses in manpower, the Turkish forces lost about 615 units of various vehicles and armored vehicles, including the American-made M113 infantry fighting vehicle (from the Turkish Armed Forces).

At the same time, the state agency SANA published shots of targeted attacks on militant positions provided by the Syrian Defense Ministry. It is noteworthy that the video was made public just a few hours before the start of negotiations between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his colleague Recep Erdogan in Moscow.




Recall, according to the agreements reached in the Kremlin between the leaders of Russia and Turkey, a ceasefire in the idlibo zone is valid from 00:01 a.m. on March 6, and, by the way, according to the reports of the Russian side and the Turkish one, it is generally observed. The agreement also implies the creation of a safe 12-kilometer corridor along the M4 highway, where joint Russian-Turkish forces will regularly patrol.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    75 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +15
      7 March 2020 13: 41
      If the Syrians really strike, then they are well done, pretty sure they do.
      1. +20
        7 March 2020 13: 53
        then really strike Syrians

        "Dear designer Mikoyan! Please make an airplane that can be controlled only with our feet, because we stretch our eyes into the slits with our hands." Korean pilot Li Xi Qing

        Old Soviet joke
        1. +28
          7 March 2020 14: 01
          6000 militants, 600 pieces of equipment. Nowhere else do they lie like in war, fishing and hunting. lol
          1. +19
            7 March 2020 14: 13
            Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
            Nowhere else do they lie like in war, fishing and hunting.

            DO NOT TOUCH fishing and hunting! This is HOLY! does no harm to anyone.
            1. +29
              7 March 2020 15: 30
              I recalled the occasion:
              Hunting and fishing vodka saved more living creatures than all the hunting supervision combined!
              1. +5
                7 March 2020 15: 45
                Anything from her can be ....
                A glass, another under the ear, a kebab is very useful, but we usually HOW ??? no matter how much you take for the supplement, you still have to run \ have to go! And then y u ......
                1. 0
                  7 March 2020 17: 47
                  What do they make concrete for buildings? belay
                  The building does not have one wall, an open doorway. The roof is just a thin concrete slab. Walls are not a bunker either.
                  The bomb explodes right next to the building in front of this opening. Yes, damn it, there the whole building should fly away, half of the blast wave should just fall into the opening.
                  The result is a fire in the building, and the building itself is unharmed.
            2. +4
              7 March 2020 17: 13
              Quote: rocket757
              does no harm to anyone.

              If it's not poaching. am
              1. -1
                7 March 2020 17: 48
                Poaching - also not to touch!
                drinks
              2. +1
                7 March 2020 18: 03
                Quote: Paranoid50
                If it's not poaching.

                No, no, no prey for! Just rest, fresh air .... the ear is a must, shulum from a hare \ vutka whenever possible \ luck, and so on, have a bite, we have everything with us!
            3. 0
              7 March 2020 22: 00
              Especially hunting does not harm animals
          2. +1
            7 March 2020 14: 22
            Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
            Nowhere else do they lie like in war, fishing and hunting.

            They don’t lie on hunting and fishing, well, if only they decorate artistically, about the war this is a continuation of politics, everyone lies there.
          3. 0
            7 March 2020 14: 54
            Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
            6000 militants, 600 pieces of equipment. Nowhere else do they lie like in war, fishing and hunting.

            The Syrians in the counts of even the Turks surpassed
            1. 0
              7 March 2020 18: 55
              BV :: Do not lie - do not become famous! laughing
          4. +6
            7 March 2020 15: 42
            Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
            6000 militants, 600 pieces of equipment. Nowhere else do they lie like in war, fishing and hunting. lol

            They usually lie after fishing and hunting Yes , and while fishing ... they say that it pecked - yesterday and will peck - tomorrow am and showing the size of the fish to a crunch in the spine fellow
          5. +3
            7 March 2020 16: 28
            And yet on the feats of arms.
          6. +1
            7 March 2020 20: 54
            That the Turks that the Syrians do not spare each other. Exterminated by the thousands.
          7. +1
            8 March 2020 02: 08
            Yes, I think they are sarcastic on reports from the Turks.
          8. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        7 March 2020 14: 16
        Quote: svp67
        If the Syrians really strike, then they are well done, pretty sure they do.

        This seems to be the work of Iranian UAVs. So the Syrians may well work.
        1. 0
          7 March 2020 14: 20
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          This seems to be the work of Iranian UAVs. So the Syrians may well work.

          "Krasnopol", perhaps, in conjunction with the UAV?
          1. +2
            7 March 2020 14: 55
            Quote: Insurgent
            "Krasnopol", perhaps, in conjunction with the UAV?

            Can. It is only hard to believe that the SAA has a lot of "Krasnopolis", there are more in conjunction with the UAV. Something is not clean here
            1. -2
              8 March 2020 01: 31
              Quote: Gritsa
              It’s hard to believe that the SAA has a lot of "Krasnopolis", there are more in conjunction with the UAV. Something is not clean here



              http://www.rusarmy.com/forum/threads/vojna-i-obschaja-situacija-v-sirii.13432/page-874
          2. +3
            7 March 2020 15: 42
            Quote: Insurgent
            "Krasnopol", perhaps, in conjunction with the UAV?
            He doesn’t care why. The main thing is that the label is suitable.
      3. +5
        7 March 2020 17: 46
        Meanwhile, the world media are unanimously writing about Russia's next victory:

        "Russia got everything it wanted"
        German Deutschlandfunk reports that Putin, following the results of the negotiations, achieved all the desired goals.
        "Turkey retains control over a small part of the region, the Russian military police creates a buffer zone. This scenario is in Russian interests. Since 2015, Russia has methodically achieved its goals in Syria, it is more powerful and wiser than Turkey, and has a deeper vision of the situation."

        "Erdogan's fiasco"
        The French Le Monde writes that the truce in Idlib, which Putin and Erdogan agreed on, can be regarded as a failure for Ankara.
        "The treaty was a defeat for Erdogan, because it does not take into account his main requirements. The document does not say a word about the surrounded Turkish observation posts and the refugees that appeared after the start of the fighting. Finally, Damascus reserves the occupied territory, although Ankara demanded the retreat of the Syrian forces."

        The American National Interest recalls that the agreement between Putin and Erdogan completely contradicts the requirements voiced by US Secretary of State Pompeo before the talks. The media called it Washington's "failure of the Turkish gambit." "This agreement put an end to Pompeo's attempt to conclude a US-Turkish alliance against Assad, supported by Iran and Russia."

        Vladimir Putin: "Every time at critical moments we managed to find common ground with our Turkish partners." And as we can see - most often it was the fifth point of the Turks)). The pan-headed couch troops, fitting in for the Turks, infected them with 1 law of ukraine: peremoga always ends in death. The Janissaries turned out to be cyborgs and immediately fell into the cauldron.
      4. 0
        7 March 2020 21: 39
        The gluing of the frames is visible ... the blows are delivered with a serious delay to the buildings which the bangers entered / drove into ... then the gluing takes place, then the cast iron flies about nearby. It can be seen that at the time of the strikes there is no one there, only the building. The bomb was clearly not high-precision. For comparison, in a recent video from our "Turkish partners" strikes were delivered in real time and on real targets - clusters of soldiers or precisely on tanks / infantry fighting vehicles, and not on houses that militants once entered.
      5. +1
        8 March 2020 02: 40
        The work on targets not in real time is noteworthy - that is, from a drone (it’s like that Orlan-10 is used by the visor’s mark, our Moscow Region has previously published different videos from drones with the same mark form) first see the target (tank, bmp ), wait for it to be fixed on the ground, and then they direct a drone from the bomber on duty using UAB or work in Krasnopol. The advantage of this is that heavier ammunition can be dropped from an aircraft, but the disadvantages of the inability to work in real time from an attack UAV are also obvious - there is more loss of manpower when hitting an attacking armored vehicle directly in real time or on a march, and a higher reaction rate. By the way, in the video, with careful viewing, there are episodes of the ATGM. The Syrians, it seems, included in the cutting all the most spectacular :) but still well done.
        1. 0
          8 March 2020 19: 14
          Quote: Slon1978
          (according to the visor’s label, it looks like Orlan-10 is being used, our MO has already published different videos from drones with the same form of label earlier)

          I'm sorry, what ?!
      6. 0
        8 March 2020 19: 12
        maybe the Syrians do, but target designation? :)
    2. +5
      7 March 2020 13: 43
      More than six thousand militants of the Jebhat al-Nusra group, banned in Russia, were liquidated. This was reported by Syrian state television. In addition to significant losses in manpower, the Turkish forces lost about 615 units of various automobile and armored vehicles, including the American-made M113 infantry fighting vehicle (from the Turkish Armed Forces).

      Get them there so that not one is gone.
    3. +8
      7 March 2020 13: 43
      I thought point - this is Point U laughing
      1. +1
        7 March 2020 14: 24
        Quote: Krasnodar
        I thought point - this is Point U

        More like a face, but about a table.
        1. +3
          7 March 2020 14: 56
          Quote: tihonmarine
          More like a face, but about a table.

          Seven times about the door, once about the rail.
      2. -1
        7 March 2020 14: 26
        Quote: Krasnodar
        I thought point - this is Point U laughing

        Not everyone in the family is written to work pointwise, even "Tochka-U".

        Ex-Ukraine, for example, has long had a complicated relationship with this system, to put it mildly.
        That, long before the war in Donbass, a residential building in the Kiev region will be "hit", then already at 14-15m, they are knocked down by everything ...
      3. +5
        7 March 2020 14: 50
        Quote: Krasnodar
        I thought point - this is Point U

        Nope, we would have seen this "point" well ... it was too "fat"
      4. +6
        7 March 2020 17: 15
        Quote: Krasnodar
        I thought point - this is Point U

        If the lines are completely pointwise, then this is Point G laughing
        Hi Albert! hi
        Packs have recognized the deaths of 50 Pakistanis in Idlib. After the impact of Turkish UAVs.
        1. +1
          7 March 2020 17: 16
          Hi! hi
          Fatimune, Zeynabune?
          1. +4
            7 March 2020 17: 22
            Quote: Krasnodar
            Fatimune, Zeynabune?

            I do not know. There are no details. request
            1. +5
              7 March 2020 17: 24
              On the side of the SAA are Pakistani and Afghan Shiite militias. In addition to Hezbollah - Lebanese and Iraqi.
              1. +5
                7 March 2020 17: 26
                Why, I was surprised ... I heard about the Afghans. About packs, no. Are the packs not sunni?
                1. +3
                  7 March 2020 18: 56
                  Among them are Shiites
                  Liva Zaynabiyiyun
    4. +5
      7 March 2020 13: 51
      Syrians along with the Russian Aerospace Forces are akin to epidemiologists.
    5. +7
      7 March 2020 13: 53
      6 militants ... about six infantry battalions ... how was the militant loss accounted for?

      Something these figures make me doubt ... too high. I think.
      1. 0
        7 March 2020 14: 32
        In the SA army, 6 thousand infantry are almost six thousand motorized rifle regiments.
        1. -1
          8 March 2020 01: 37
          Quote: siberalt
          In the army of SA 6 thousand infantry it's almost six thousand motorized rifle regiments.


          ????????????????

          Maybe "6 thousand infantry" is "six motorized rifle regiments"?
      2. +2
        7 March 2020 15: 30
        6 militants ...
        Well, for about 60 days. In addition, they were forced to attack (return the cities), plus the Turks needed success as soon as possible, they could well drive the broads forward, and they always succeed in driving for slaughter.
        Moreover, the Turks, too, didn’t go out into the open for some reason, which forced them (it seems that the front of the Babakhs collapsed and the losses were unmeasured), well, the Turks didn’t have another choice to keep Idlib.
      3. +5
        7 March 2020 16: 14
        Perhaps total, by interpolation (or interpretation) smile ) But still a bit too much. How many were there to continue resistance and even attack after such losses?
        1. +2
          7 March 2020 18: 37
          excuse me, from Aleppo alone more than 50k were evacuated with the families, and remember that 5 women were taken to Idlib for XNUMX years, so there are a lot of them
    6. +1
      7 March 2020 14: 15
      Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
      6000 militants, 600 pieces of equipment. Nowhere else do they lie like in war, fishing and hunting. lol

      Everything that is acquired by excessive work ... Three tape recorders, three movie cameras abroad, three cigarette cases domestic, a suede jacket ... three jackets ...
      The Turks also wrote similar things .. A whole brigade of SAR in one fell swoop killing. Moreover, they wrote victorious reports stupidly rewriting the number of members ..
      Well, 6000 barmaley or 600 .. who will figure it out.
    7. -1
      7 March 2020 14: 22
      Something really works jewelry, especially on cars in motion
      1. +2
        7 March 2020 14: 59
        Quote: Stalllker
        Something really works jewelry, especially on cars in motion

        I agree. I could still believe that when reconnaissance from drones, Syrians can destroy warehouses, garages, crowded places, and armored vehicles. But this...
        1. 0
          7 March 2020 15: 01
          So I think whether our people there modestly and quietly help
    8. +2
      7 March 2020 15: 01
      And I personally liked the video that everything is clearly visible, in color. And it’s forever a black and white muddy spot and everyone was defeated! Here you can see exactly what they did, and there is some kind of turbidity.
    9. +1
      7 March 2020 15: 02
      Great shots ...
    10. -8
      7 March 2020 15: 02
      Is the methodology for determining militants interesting? And then in the video ordinary cars drive up to ordinary houses and are destroyed. Or there, civilians, in principle, do not drive transport. And so if you destroy everything that moves so they still have little bombed. You can record each passenger car with a tank with five passengers (terrorists)
    11. +3
      7 March 2020 15: 08
      And why in this patrol there is no place for the Syrian military? This is their land, and they must be part of the patrol!
    12. -1
      7 March 2020 15: 08
      Of course, I won’t believe in such losses, but this pigsty was notably pressed there, it’s nice that the Turks clearly had underestimated losses, all 300 could die, and if you take the mummers next to the terrorists, maybe 500.
      It is not very clear how many VKS were destroyed there, and whether MLRS and TOS were used.
      1. 0
        7 March 2020 18: 40
        for 2 months of promotion with pretty heavy fights, why not? the baboons defended themselves fiercely, and the last 3-4 days continuously attacked Sarakib and the surrounding area, so that I won’t be surprised that where they died so
        1. 0
          7 March 2020 21: 33
          for 2 months of promotion with pretty heavy fights, why not? the baboons defended themselves fiercely, and the last 3-4 days continuously attacked Sarakib and the surrounding area, so that I won’t be surprised that where they died so
          With such a density of battle formations, this is already a full-fledged war. And not modern low intensity. There is already quite a topic and WWII recipes: full artillery preparation, an offensive following the fire shaft, etc.
          Or not? Who knows, please comment.
          1. -1
            7 March 2020 22: 57
            there is no front as such, battles are fought for key settlements like Sarakib, and for roads, but in places of clashes the density of troops is really not small, for example, the 25th division attacked for the last time on a front 4-5km wide
            1. 0
              9 March 2020 08: 27
              but in places of clashes the density of troops is really not small, for example, the 25th division attacked for the last time on a front 4-5km wide
              So the shaft of fire and the offensive right behind it is applied on the offensive site. And not for the entire length of the front. The whole division in the 4-5 km band is already quite a suitable situation for WWII recipes.
    13. +3
      7 March 2020 15: 13
      These are footage from the operation near Aleppo, when the terrorists were defeated there, even before the fighting near Seraqib. This footage can also be seen at Anna News.
    14. 0
      7 March 2020 15: 33
      Quote: Aron Zaavi
      It seems to work

      Even if our MTRs worked in conjunction with aviation and artillery, it’s all the same .... it’s their air conditioners that explode! So does the Bandera excuse, after the rocket fire of Lugansk?
    15. +2
      7 March 2020 15: 41
      Quote: Gritsa
      Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
      6000 militants, 600 pieces of equipment. Nowhere else do they lie like in war, fishing and hunting.

      The Syrians in the counts of even the Turks surpassed

      C'mon, the Syrians talk about the loss of the broads over 60 days (100 per day - given that the broads were forced to attack and return the city, it’s completely acceptable)

      and the Turks reported that in a couple of days almost 2000 were killed.
    16. +2
      7 March 2020 15: 42
      I’m shooting a film for FSE, all the Androids have phones with phones ...
      But there’s no time for fighting, while you remove your slippers, wash your pussy / feet, serve a prayer service, in the sense of the Prophet, you won’t finish the brow-day ...
      In short, ... a miracle-yuda (God forgive me, it's me about evil spirits) I will win anyway ... ''
    17. -2
      7 March 2020 16: 22
      Weakly our VKS use cruise missiles against separate armored vehicles and the accumulation of infantry.

      Either the X-25 missiles are few, or they themselves are not very effective in use.

      But on individual buildings, the KABs work well, at least they fall for sure.
    18. 0
      7 March 2020 16: 40
      Good job ! but I doubt that the Syrians do it.
    19. 0
      7 March 2020 16: 49
      The Turks are lying, but at least there is something on the video, but there is not a single unit of armored vehicles destroyed here, some cars, etc., but they say about 615 units. "Why should you feel sorry for them, bastard, write more!"
    20. +2
      7 March 2020 16: 51
      Well, the Syrians pulled the militants! Well done!
    21. -1
      7 March 2020 16: 56
      Not so exact blows. Everything around and around an object similar to an armored personnel carrier continuing to ride ... Here the Turks have clear shots and each missile just hits the target.
    22. 0
      7 March 2020 17: 30
      All mixed up. The Turks are the same, they seemed to show.
    23. +1
      7 March 2020 17: 38
      Compare with the attacks of Turkish drones, this is a tip from the drone, but aviation operates with high-explosives, mainly on stationary objects. By moving can’t. The video was shot like a normal streaming, there is no thermal imaging channel.
    24. +2
      7 March 2020 18: 03
      Quote: Alexey from Perm
      By moving can’t.

      Well, they can’t always at 1:43 minute precisely hit a moving object, but at the end of the video they burn into white light like a pretty penny. But the Syrians, plus for honesty: do not varnish reality!
    25. +2
      7 March 2020 19: 39
      Losses of the enemy are too high and Turks CAA, do you represent 600 pieces of equipment? the entire Internet would be flooded with photos of destroyed tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, carts, and other vehicles ... the truth is somewhere in between
    26. 0
      8 March 2020 09: 56
      all the destroyed buildings are schools and hospitals, all transport is school buses, and all weapons used are exclusively chemical ... it's obvious .. that's why there are so many refugees through Turkey to Europe

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"