Stalin's Marshal of Diplomacy

Stalin's Marshal of Diplomacy

Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR, during a conference in San Francisco at which the United Nations was created. September 1945


130 years ago, on March 9, 1890, the future Soviet political and statesman V.M. Molotov was born. The head of the Soviet government from 1930 to 1941, the People's Commissar, and then the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR: in 1939-1949 and 1953-1956. The real marshal of Soviet diplomacy, the creator of the Great Victory, the closest associate of Stalin, who until his death remained a supporter of his policy.

Vyacheslav Mikhailovich did not study specifically as a diplomat. I did not speak a good foreign language. Although during his life he learned to read and understand French, English and German. But for almost 13 years, he defended the interests of the Soviet power and people, conducted difficult negotiations with experienced foreign diplomats and leaders. The largest Western politicians unanimously ranked Molotov among the greatest diplomats of all time. So, the US Secretary of State in 1953-1959. John F. Dulles considered Molotov the greatest diplomat in the world since the beginning of the twentieth century. Vyacheslav Molotov was a conductor of the Stalinist course, a national diplomat. He steadfastly and skillfully defended the interests of our country and people.

Revolutionary


Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov was born on March 9 (February 25, st.). 1890 in the Kukark settlement of the Kukarsky volost of the Yaransk district of the Vyatka province (now Sovetsk, Kirov region). The real name is Scriabin. Father - Mikhail Prokhorovich Scriabin, from the philistines (petty bourgeoisie - urban estate in the Russian Empire), mother - Anna Yakovlevna Nebogatikova, from a merchant family. After school, Vyacheslav studied at the Kazan Real School. There he became acquainted with Marxism, in 1905 he began to support the Bolsheviks, in 1906 he joined the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party (RSDLP).

He had a usual life for revolutionaries of that time: already in 1909 he was arrested and poisoned in exile in the Vologda Oblast. In 1911 he received freedom and completed his studies at a real school. In 1912, Vyacheslav Skryabin entered the Faculty of Economics of St. Petersburg Polytechnic Institute, where he studied until the fourth year. His main occupation was not study, but a revolutionary struggle. Vyacheslav conducted party work, took part in the creation of the newspaper Pravda, where he was the editorial secretary. In 1915 he was sent to the second exile - to the Irkutsk province. At the same time, he adopted a party pseudonym - Molotov.

In 1916, Molotov fled from exile. Arrived in Petrograd, where he became part of the Russian Bureau of the Central Committee of the RSDLP (b). By the time of the overthrow of Tsar Nicholas II, Molotov was already one of the most respected leaders of the Bolsheviks who were at large in Russia. He again entered the editorial office of the newspaper Pravda, became a member of the executive committee of the Petrosoviet and the Petrograd Committee of the RSDLP (b). After February, he was an opponent of cooperation with the Provisional Government and a supporter of the deepening revolution, armed insurrection. But after the return to Russia, many prominent revolutionaries were relegated to the background.

During the Civil War he worked on the economic and party lines. After the Civil War, he again became a prominent figure in Soviet Russia. At the Tenth Congress of the RCP (B) in March 1921, Vyacheslav Molotov was elected a member of the Central Committee, and at the plenum held at the same time, he was actually the first secretary of the Central Committee. In 1922, the post of Secretary General was established, which was taken by Stalin. Molotov moved to a second role in the Secretariat.


Meeting of the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR V.M. Molotov at the Anhalt station in Berlin. The head of the Soviet government was met by the Chief of Staff of the Wehrmacht’s High Command, Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel and German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop. In the second row on the left behind Molotov is the plenipotentiary representative of the USSR in Germany, Alexei Alexeyevich Shkvartsev. November 12, 1940

Stalin's ally and “marshal” of diplomacy


After the death of Lenin, Molotov became an active supporter of Stalin and remained faithful to him until his death. He opposed Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, the "right deviators" (Bukharin, Rykov, Tomsky). In 1930, Vyacheslav Mikhailovich headed the Soviet government, replacing Rykov. Molotov worked hard during the years of the first five-year plans and made a great contribution to the growth of the economy, the welfare of society, the country's defense, the implementation of large-scale industrial and infrastructure projects, industrialization, urbanization, modernization, etc.

In May 1939, Molotov replaced Litvinov as the People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR, retaining the post of head of government. Litvinov’s name is associated with Moscow’s attempt to create a collective security system in Europe. The Union pursued a flexible, extremely cautious policy. Litvinov tried to push through the idea of ​​creating a new Entente to the last. In this situation, Russia again became the "cannon fodder" of the West, as in 1914. This did not suit Stalin, he did not want the Russians to fight again not for their own, but for other people's interests. By 1939, the situation in Europe and the world had changed dramatically. The inevitability of World War II became apparent, like the policy of the West to set Hitler's Third Reich against the USSR (the policy of "appeasing" Hitler at the expense of Russia). The course towards creating a collective security system has crashed. It was necessary to avoid the war with the imperialist powers as long as possible and tighten foreign policy, restoring Russian imperial positions (until 1917).

Stalin maneuvered to the last, tried to stay away from the world war caused by the crisis of capitalism, trying to turn the global conflict into an internal affair of the West. That is, the Union had to play the role of a wise monkey on a hill from a Chinese parable that looks at the battle of two tigers. At the same time, Moscow has consistently restored national positions lost after the 1917 revolution (Poland, the Baltic states, Finland, Bessarabia).

Stalin did not want to be the "cannon fodder" of the West, to avoid a new clash of Russians and Germans in the interests of London and Washington. He tried to lead the Russian game according to his own rules. And the conductor of this course was Molotov. Stalin and Molotov managed a lot. Moscow managed to restore many positions of the Russian Empire, to return the Baltic States, Bessarabia, Vyborg, and the western regions of White and Little Russia to Russia. Hitler managed to avoid the blow in 1939, delaying the war until the summer of 1941. The Kremlin has perplexed both England and France, demanding from them a full-fledged military alliance against Germany, and when they refused - concluded an agreement with Hitler. In the winter of 1939-1940, during the war with Finland, a very dangerous situation was avoided. After all, Britain and France, already in a state of "strange" war with the Reich, planned to attack the USSR in Scandinavia and the Caucasus. For Hitler, this situation was simply a miracle - a war between the main opponents. But the USSR managed to deal with Finland faster than the allies landed troops to help the Finns.

As a result, the world war began as a clash of two capitalist camps. It was possible to avoid a war on two fronts - immediately with Germany and Japan. England and the United States, when plans to destroy the red empire by Hitler failed, they had to support the USSR in the war. Stalin and Molotov made the USSR-Russia one of the most important parts of the new world order. Created the Yalta-Potsdam political system.

Thus, the “tandem” Stalin-Molotov very successfully and competently led the foreign policy of the Soviet state during the 10 most difficult years - the Second World War and the Cold War (in fact, already the third world war - between the USSR and the “collective West” headed by from the USA). And there is no doubt about Molotov’s knowledge and personal qualities. He was in his place. Successfully restored the position of the USSR-Russia in the world, was one of the founders of the Soviet superpower.

Winston Churchill, a terrible enemy of Russia and one of the great politicians of the West, gave Molotov this characteristic:

“I have never seen a human being who would be more suited to the modern concept of automaton. Nevertheless, he was obviously a sensible and carefully polished diplomat ... There is no doubt that in Molotov the Soviet machine found a capable and in many respects typical representative — always a faithful member of the party and a follower of communism. Having lived to old age, I am glad that I did not have to endure the stress that he was subjected to - I would rather not be born at all. As for the management of foreign policy, Sully [the first minister of King of France Henry IV], Talleyrand and Metternich will gladly accept him in their company, if only there is such an afterlife where the Bolsheviks allow themselves access. ”

That is, in the West, Vyacheslav Molotov was considered one of the greatest statesmen in the world stories. He defended the interests of the country and the people with all his might, never was a “convenient partner” for the West. It is clear what caused undisguised irritation in the West. Molotov in the West was nicknamed "Mr. No" for his intransigence (later this nickname was "inherited" by A. A. Gromyko). The Foreign Minister became the founder of the "imperial" diplomatic school. Nominated by Andrei Gromyko and a number of other leading diplomats of the USSR.

Also, during the war years, Molotov was deputy, first deputy chairman of the Council of People's Commissars (later the Council of Ministers). Molotov was also the deputy chairman of the State Defense Committee (GKO), and was a member of the Headquarters of the Supreme Commander. It was he who, at the beginning of World War II, spoke on the radio with a report on the attack of Nazi Germany on the Union. On June 22, 1941, at 12 noon, the words of Vyacheslav Mikhailovich were heard throughout the Soviet state: “Our cause is just. The enemy will be defeated. Victory will be ours". Molotov was responsible for development tank industry. For labor services to the Motherland by a decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of September 30, 1943, Vyacheslav Mikhailovich was awarded the title Hero of Socialist Labor with the award of the Order of Lenin and the Gold Medal "Hammer and Sickle."


USSR Ambassador to Great Britain I.M. Maisky, People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR V.M. Molotov and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill on a walk in the garden of the residence of the British Prime Minister (10 Downing Street) in London. May 1942

Opal


Molotov was Stalin's “right hand”; he was rightly considered one of the possible successors of the great leader. Therefore, various intrigues were waged against him. In 1949, Vyacheslav Mikhailovich fell under suspicion: Molotov's wife was implicated in the so-called. case of the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee, arrested and sent into exile. Molotov was removed from his post as head of the Soviet Foreign Ministry (he was replaced by Vyshinsky). At the same time, Molotov remained one of the deputy chairmen of the Council of Ministers (that is, the supreme). Already in 1952, Molotov was elected to the party’s highest governing body - to the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee.

After Stalin left (apparently eliminated him), Molotov was one of his possible successors. At the same time, he is an ardent supporter of the continuation of his foreign policy and domestic course. However, he was not eager for power. After the murder of Beria, Molotov tried to confront Khrushchev, but it was too late. In May 1956, under the pretext of a wrong policy on the Yugoslav issue, Molotov was relieved of his post as Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR. Then he tried to remove Khrushchev along with Malenkov, Kaganovich, Voroshilov, Bulganin and others, but the so-called. the anti-party group was defeated. Molotov was deprived of the highest posts in the state and the party and sent into exile by the ambassador to Mongolia, then as the representative of the USSR at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). For such a diplomatic "bison" as Molotov, it was a mockery.

Vyacheslav Mikhailovich did not reconcile and still tried to resist the anti-people course of Khrushchev. Repeatedly appealed to the Central Committee of the CPSU in defense of the Stalinist course (these documents were classified at the direction of Khrushchev). In 1961, he criticized the new edition of the CPSU Program. Molotov was retired and expelled from the party. They restored it in the Communist Party only in 1984, under Chernenko, who was thinking about the full rehabilitation of Stalin and his politics (but did not have time). Until his death, Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov was a solid Stalinist. The great Russian and Soviet statesman passed away on November 8, 1986.


Marshal of the Soviet Union, chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and chairman of the State Defense Committee of the USSR Joseph Stalin speaks with the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov at the Yalta Conference. February 1945
Author:
Photos used:
http://waralbum.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pessimist22 7 March 2020 06: 48 New
    • 10
    • 42
    -32
    I know for sure that the main ideologist of the bourgeois way of life was the Communist Party of the USSR.
    1. oracul 7 March 2020 08: 16 New
      • 19
      • 11
      +8
      Blurted out, but with what with aplomb. The author does not cause anything other than a feeling of complete ignorance.
      1. Olgovich 7 March 2020 11: 11 New
        • 17
        • 25
        -8
        Quote: oracul
        The author does not cause anything but a feeling of complete ignorance.

        From the article: "Nearest associate Stalin’s, “greatest”, “most complicated” ..

        Stalin Malenkov, Beria and Mikoyan:
        “I find your encryption completely unsatisfactory. It is the result of the naivety of three, on the one hand, and sleight of hand of the fourth member, that is, Molotov, on the other hand ... However, he took no measures to put an end to the ugliness, until I intervened in this matter. Why didn't he take action? Is it because libel is included in the plan of his work? .. Before your encryption, I thought that I could limit myself to reprimanding against Molotov. Now this is not enough. I made sure that Molotov does not really value the interests of our state and the prestige of our government, just to achieve popularity among some foreign circles. I cannot consider such a comrade as my first deputy. ”:


        Such an assessment ...

        And Stalin removed him, and exiled his wife. Moreover, in exile she was arrested ... again "for treason to the Motherland", Stalin's death saved her.
        Her brother, sister, nephews were arrested, two died in prison ...

        Molotov about him at the 20th congress:

        “Supported by the entire party, Central Committee firmly opposed the personality cult alien to Marxism-Leninism, which played such a negative role in a certain period. We can express confidence that the present congress will fully approve this fundamental principle. ”

        Had ordinary for revolutionaries of that time, life

        Those. DID NOT WORK, DO NOT WORK not a penny to bread for almost 30 years ...

        The Union pursued a flexible, extremely cautious policy. Litvinov tried to push through the idea of ​​creating a new Entente to the last. In this situation, Russia again became the "cannon fodder" of the West, as in 1914 gode.
        The union was supposed to play the role of the wise monkey on a hill from a Chinese parable that looks at the battle of two tigers

        Surprisingly, the author does not know the numbers: in WWI, the Anglo-French people were cannon fodder, and by no means Russia.
        In WWII, more than 50% of all losses suffered by the USSR (excluding China)

        About wise and monkeys, yes ...
        Molotov, 1939
        not only pointless, but also it’s criminal to wage such a war like a war for the destruction of Hitlerism

        Then about Poland:
        proved a short blow to Poland from the side of the first German army, and then - Red Armyso that nothing is left of this ugly brainchild of the Treaty of Versailles:


        After trampling his wife in the Central Committee (where he didn’t defend her with a word), he also wrote
        : “When I voted on the proposal for expulsion from the party by the Pearl, I abstained, which I recognized as politically erroneous. I declare that, having thought over this question, I vote for this decision of the Central Committeewhich meets the interests of the party and the state and teaches the correct understanding of communist partisanship. In addition, I admit heavy guilt


        After the death of Stalin immediately asked Beria to return his wife, which he did, the very day after the funeral of Stalin ...
        1. Looking for 7 March 2020 16: 37 New
          • 10
          • 7
          +3
          Great Stalin looked into the water.
          1. Krasnodar 7 March 2020 20: 17 New
            • 7
            • 5
            +2
            Quote: Seeker
            Great Stalin looked into the water.

            Fake golem laughing
            Stalin was a fairly competent person and knew perfectly well what Zionism is.
            1. ccsr 12 March 2020 17: 41 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Krasnodar
              Stalin was a fairly competent person and knew perfectly well what Zionism is.

              Nobody argues with this - he knew what Zionism is. But he could not imagine that they would throw him like that after he created the state of Israel, contrary to the will of the same British.
              1. Krasnodar 12 March 2020 18: 40 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                lol And who threw it? )))
                Israel asked him to let the Soviet Jews go, many of whom were not opposed, Stalin did not like it, because it was strictly haram to leave the paradise of workers and peasants, so he initiated the doctors' case, after which the relationship cooled. And after the supply of weapons by Khrushchev, Egypt became hostile. Read Primakov’s book "The Middle East" - there it is all painted without embellishment
                1. ccsr 12 March 2020 18: 53 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  Quote: Krasnodar
                  And who threw it?

                  The Israelis.
                  Quote: Krasnodar
                  Israel asked him to release Soviet Jews, many of whom were not opposed,

                  You never know what they asked for from us - you apparently "forgot" that we were rebuilding the country after the war, and we did not have enough hands. Why on earth did Stalin have to meet them - can you justify reasonably?
                  Quote: Krasnodar
                  And after the supply of weapons by Khrushchev to Egypt

                  Stalin was no longer alive for a long time - there was no need to attract facts by the ears; it was about creating the state of Israel and the role of Stalin in this.
                  1. Krasnodar 12 March 2020 19: 12 New
                    • 3
                    • 3
                    0
                    1) And how the Israelis threw him laughing
                    2) Should not have gone towards - but to initiate a fake through and through business of doctors was an abominable step
                    3) Yes, you sho? And I thought, Khrushchev became Secretary General under Stalin lol
                    4) All infrastructures of the state of Israel were created before the independence of the country. Stalin, in defiance of the British, gave five votes to the UN for the creation of Israel, agreed to sell weapons when the Jews needed them - he was pissed off by an agreement on mutual military assistance between Jordan and the British.
                    1. ccsr 13 March 2020 11: 46 New
                      • 2
                      • 1
                      +1
                      Quote: Krasnodar
                      1) And how the Israelis threw him

                      The most primitive:
                      After the Second World War, Stalin did a lot to ensure that the State of Israel appeared on the world map, but was deceived. Stalin hoped that Israel would become the pillar of the USSR in the Middle East. After all, Hagana waged a bloody struggle with the British, until they left Palestine. Stalin’s calculation turned out to be erroneous. Israel is increasingly focused on the United States.

                      https://newsland.com/community/129/content/kak-evrei-obmanuli-stalina/1291883
                      Quote: Krasnodar
                      2) Should not have gone towards - but to initiate a fake through and through business of doctors was an abominable step

                      Cry in a vest for someone else:
                      Molotov: "When he (Stalin - NB) read at the Politburo meeting the material that the KGB brought him to Polina Semenovna, my knees trembled. But you won’t get into the case against her. The Chekists tried. What was she accused of? In relations with the Zionist organization, with the Ambassador of Israel, Golda Meir. They wanted to make Crimea a Jewish autonomous region. She had a good relationship with Mikhoels. The Chekists found that he was a stranger. Of course, she needed to be more discriminating in dating.

                      Quote: Krasnodar
                      . Stalin, in defiance of the British, gave five votes to the UN for the creation of Israel,

                      That's just why they should kiss him below his back.
                      1. Krasnodar 13 March 2020 12: 26 New
                        • 3
                        • 3
                        0
                        1) Israel reoriented to the United States thanks to the massive SS military support for the Arabs, as well as the presence of Soviet troops in Egypt in the late 60s, trying to help Nasser return Sinai - so you can blame anyone, but not Jews.
                        2) Why do the Jews cry? laughing Israel - shekel is one of the most stable currencies in the world, a pension of $ 1500 per month life expectancy - 82,3 g))
                        As for ties with Golda Meir, a fake about Jewish autonomy in Crimea, which contradicts Zionism in principle, and ties with Mikhoels, who collected grandmothers from Amer’s fellow tribesmen in the Red Army during the war — they’ll shoot for this !! lol
                        3) It was 5 votes out of 33. for, 13 against, 10 abstained)). Why kiss - for the Soviet policy of squeezing the British with BV?
                      2. ccsr 13 March 2020 12: 36 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Israel reoriented itself to the United States thanks to the massive Socialist-Revolutionary military support for the Arabs, as well as the presence of Soviet troops in Egypt in the late 60s,

                        Stalin was not involved in this, so there is no need for cheap distortions.
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Israel - the shekel is one of the most stable currencies in the world, a pension of $ 1500 per month life expectancy - 82,3 g.

                        Tell us about the successes of this state - especially about American aid, and how well you live there, taking into account female military service.
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        It was 5 votes out of 33. for, 13 against, 10 abstained)). Why kiss - for the Soviet policy of squeezing the British with BV?

                        The votes were decisive - this is so for you, for information. And what goals Stalin set was not so important - it is important that the Israelis threw him and he understood who he had contacted in vain.
                      3. Krasnodar 13 March 2020 12: 47 New
                        • 3
                        • 2
                        +1
                        1) Taki - yes. But during the life of Stalin, there was no smell of reorientation to the United States - so what about cheating? )))
                        2) US US assistance is provided for Israel’s refusal from Sinai, accounting for about 3% of the budget. Egypt and Jordan have been given the same assistance in concluding peace with Israel. As for the compulsory draft for women - I will say more - there are several applicants for one place of voluntary (for women) service in the combat unit - patriotism - you don’t understand hi
                        3) Say - I would vote against laughing it would turn out 15 against 28 votes for with 10 abstentions. Once again - how was he thrown?
                      4. ccsr 13 March 2020 13: 03 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        But during the life of Stalin, there was no smell of reorientation to the United States - so what about cheating?

                        It was - that’s why Stalin cooled to them, because kibbutzim were not signs of a socialist orientation.
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        US US assistance is provided for Israel’s refusal from Sinai, accounting for about 3% of the budget.

                        Do not fool me with OFFICIAL budget payments, but rather admit that American Jews directly and by pressure on the US government pour such money into the Israeli economy, without which all prosperity would immediately evaporate.
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Say - I would vote against

                        Have you heard anything about the veto?
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Once again - how was he thrown?

                        The most primitive - did not become an outpost of building socialism in the Middle East, as he was promised by those who sought the creation of the state of Israel ..
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        there are several applicants for one place of voluntary (for women) service in the combat unit - patriotism - you do not understand

                        And why then the compulsory military service for women will not be canceled? Tell in more detail "understanding" ...
                      5. Krasnodar 13 March 2020 13: 58 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        1) laughing
                        Stalin cooled off because of the desire of Soviet Jews to leave the USSR, as well as the desire of Israel to accept them - once again, read Primakov
                        2) For every dollar made by a citizen of Russia, an Israeli produces three. Given the larger per capita number of children and pensioners, I think this figure is even higher. As for American Jews, the lobby provides Israel with access to any (almost) technology. That is yes.
                        3) laughing The veto is at the UN Security Council, to Gen. Has nothing to do with the Assembly
                        4) What ??? During the life of Stalin, Israel was ruled by socialists - for your information, equality in society was much higher than in the USSR)).
                        5) Because in theory, Israel can fight with the entire Middle East at the same time, so more guys should be freed from logistics and other things for combat units and their maintenance. hi
                      6. ccsr 13 March 2020 18: 19 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Stalin cooled off because of the desire of Soviet Jews to leave the USSR,

                        He didn’t create Israel for this - you can’t enter or don’t want to?
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        For every dollar made by a Russian citizen, an Israeli produces three.

                        Something flow of those who want to taste these charms from Russia has dried up - as Arbatova said, only illiterate Jews leave for Israel in Russia.
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        The veto is at the UN Security Council, to Gen. Has nothing to do with the Assembly

                        How could the General Assembly decide something, if without the approval of the Security Council, which brought up this issue, the issue itself might not be on the agenda at all.
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        What ??? During the life of Stalin, Israel was ruled by socialists - for your information, equality in society was much higher than in the USSR)).

                        And why didn’t they lead Israel to socialism? Or was it some kind of wise Jewish socialism and it still exists?
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Because in theory, Israel can fight the whole Middle East at the same time,

                        In theory, yes, but nevertheless he raked more than once from his neighbors. What are you talking about, if rockets from Gaza fly farther into the depths of Israel - is it a victory or what?
                      7. Krasnodar 13 March 2020 21: 27 New
                        • 2
                        • 3
                        -1
                        1) He did not create Israel - you cannot understand this laughing
                        2) The creation of a state is not within the competence of the UN Security Council - let it be known to you)) The British, by the way, also have a veto in the Security Council
                        3) For the happiness of Israel, socialism was crushed in the late 70s. Although some of its manifestations, such as the Labor Union, spoiling the lives of citizens with strikes and pampering members of the organization with tower salaries at the expense of the taxpayer, still exist. Therefore, now the country's economic situation is stable and pretty good.
                        4) All the Arab-Israeli wars went for the destruction of the country, as we see - Israel exists and is a highly developed state, therefore it won. The Gaza Strip - does not have its own statehood, is controlled by one of the Palestinian organizations, which are at war with the authorities of the Palestinian Authority. Therefore, in addition to mopping up and bombing militants, to do with him nefig. The Israelis do not want to occupy it under the new one, they will not destroy it, the status quo, in principle, suits them. hi
                      8. ccsr 14 March 2020 14: 32 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        The creation of a state is not within the competence of the UN Security Council - let it be known to you

                        The creation of states does not fall within the purview of the UN at all - for example, the former republics of the USSR or Czechoslovakia became states without any resolutions.
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Fortunately for Israel, socialism was crushed in the late 70s. Although some of its manifestations, such as the Labor Union, spoiling the lives of citizens with strikes and pampering members of the organization with tower salaries at the expense of the taxpayer, still exist.

                        You’d better fight the Orthodox as much as you would with socialism — they cost you more than all trade unions.
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        All Arab-Israeli wars went for the destruction of the country, as we see - Israel

                        At 67, Israel itself attacked, so do not la la.

                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        The Israelis do not want to occupy it under the new one, they will not destroy it, the status quo, in principle, suits them.

                        Shots of Israel from the sector also suit you, especially when the prime minister falls under them? Glad for your optimism.
                      9. Krasnodar 14 March 2020 16: 37 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        1) I agree - so where is the rye of Stalin in the creation of Israel?
                        2) Orthodox - also a problem, I agree
                        3) In 1967? laughing
                        Egypt - after the blockade of the Tirana Bays, the deployment of troops (in violation of agreements) to the Sinai, Nasser’s expulsion of UN troops received a preventive strike. Jordan - opened fire first, Syria with Iraq too hi
                        4) Of course, they are not satisfied. A question of alternatives.
  • naidas 7 March 2020 17: 40 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    Quote: Olgovich
    “I find your encryption completely unsatisfactory. It is the result of the naivety of the three, on the one hand, and the sleight of hand of the fourth member, that is, Molotov,

    Olgovich as always pulled out of the text and come on:
    On December 8, Stalin wrote to the troika: “The encryption makes an unpleasant impression in view of the presence in it of a number of clearly false provisions. In addition, I do not agree with your interpretation of the issue on the merits. ”
    Quote: Olgovich
    exiled his wife. Moreover, she was arrested in exile ... again "for treason to the Motherland"

    For the surrender of his brother, it was necessary to give the prize to Polina according to Olgovich.
    She told Soviet Jewish "activists" about what her husband shared with her, and American intelligence was aware of all the secret decisions of the Politburo.
    Polina herself called Stalin a genius. She said to Stalin’s daughters Svetlana: “Your father is a genius. He destroyed the fifth column in our country, and when the war broke out, the party and the people were united. Now there is no more revolutionary spirit, opportunism is everywhere. ”
    And the rest can not be read, most likely taken from the Internet dumps.
    1. Olgovich 8 March 2020 08: 47 New
      • 2
      • 6
      -4
      Quote: naidas
      Olgovich as always pulled out of the text and come on:
      On December 8, Stalin wrote to the troika: “The encryption makes an unpleasant impression in view of the presence in it of a number of clearly false provisions. In addition, I do not agree with your interpretation of the issue on the merits. ”

      I FULLY cite Stalin's CONCLUSION:
      I can not consider such a comrade as my first deputy
      . Do you have "add-ons" to him? No? lol

      Who cares what caused Stalin’s decision (he knows better)? The important thing is that he is completely refused in trusting the "closest" ally.
      Quote: naidas
      For the surrender of his brother, it was necessary to give the prize to Polina according to Olgovich.
      She told the Soviet Jewish "activists" about what her husband shared with her, and american intelligence bShe was aware of all the secret decisions of the Politburo.

      This bullshit drilling into a tube and yes.
      Beria's Stalin released the traitor “NEXT day after Stalin’s funeral.
      Got it, no?
      Quote: naidas
      Daughters of stalin Svetlana "

      The real one TRADITOR of the country and father Svetlana - the daughter of Stalin ... in authority belay lol fool
      Quote: naidas
      Yes, and the rest can not be read, most likely taken from the Internet

      And you refute, ignoramus and ignoramus, the given iron facts lol
  • Alekseev 9 March 2020 20: 18 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    К
    Quote: Olgovich
    Such an assessment ...

    And rightly so, although "some civilian" minus signs are raging.
    Quote: Olgovich
    Had a usual life for revolutionaries of that time
    Those. NOT A DAY I worked, I didn’t earn a dime on my bread until almost 30 years old ...

    And that's for sure! But Comrade Scriabin was a product of his era and did not try to fear, but for his conscience for the implementation of "his truth." According to G.K.Zhukov, Molotov was a very cruel and stubborn leader, not afraid to argue with the leader of the peoples, defending his point of view. But in the interests of the matter, without affecting the basics. those. tried, Stalin saw it, well, there were abilities.
    And so, an experienced apparatchik was spared fate, instead of very drastic measures, he simply fell down and lived up to 96 years in a country house near Moscow.
    In this extremely difficult and controversial time, there were many great achievements, but also state crimes. And Molotov-Scriabin, if you do not twist, is a historical figure ...
    Live Stalin a little more and comrade Molotov, no longer needed and suspected by the leader, could pay in full for all his sins, free and not free, before the Russian people.
    1. Olgovich 10 March 2020 11: 31 New
      • 0
      • 5
      -5
      Quote: Alekseev
      In this extremely difficult and controversial time, there were many great achievements, but also state crimes. And Molotov-Scriabin, whatever you say, historical person.
      Certainly, without him, you won’t tell about the history of 1930-1950 ....
      Quote: Alekseev
      Live Stalin a little more and comrade Molotov, no longer needed and suspected by the leader, could pay in full for all his sins, free and not free, before the Russian people.

      not only Scriabin, but also Beria, Mikoyan lucky.....

      What pleases that 75-80 percent of the members of the Central Committee, the PB, the organizing bureau and SNK1917-1930-bad luck......
  • Bar1 7 March 2020 08: 29 New
    • 10
    • 17
    -7
    watched a video about the first persons of the government of the USSR Voroshilov, Dzerzhinsky and Molotov. What united them? All three had Jewish wives, and Molotov’s wife even sat in a Zionist case.
    1. Malyuta 7 March 2020 09: 05 New
      • 17
      • 4
      +13
      Quote: Bar1
      watched a video about the first persons of the government of the USSR

      Find the time of Kamrada and look about the true Stalin era!
  • Krasnodar 7 March 2020 09: 09 New
    • 12
    • 6
    +6
    Quote: Pessimist22
    I know for sure that the main ideologist of the bourgeois way of life was the Communist Party of the USSR.

    Party nomenclature))
    1. user 7 March 2020 09: 48 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Party nomenclature))


      And this is the point.
    2. SOVIET UNION 2 7 March 2020 12: 50 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      Party nomenclature))
      The bureaucracy has no signs of the ruling class: “An attempt to present the Soviet bureaucracy as a class of“ state capitalists “obviously does not stand up to criticism. The bureaucracy has neither stocks nor bonds. It is recruited, replenished, updated in the order of an administrative hierarchy, regardless of any special property relations inherent in it. An individual official cannot inherit his rights to operate the state apparatus. Bureaucracy abuses privileges. ” That is why, according to Trotsky, the bureaucracy seeks to eliminate the gains of the October Revolution and the restoration of capitalism - it needs to legally secure its property rights.
      According to Trotsky, in order to regain power and control over the socialized means of production, the proletariat must carry out a political revolution, preserving the economic basis of the Soviet state. Otherwise, the victory and strengthening of the power of the bureaucracy, which is increasingly expanding its own privileges and increasing social inequality, will lead to the restoration of capitalism. “The regime of the USSR contains ... terrifying contradictions. But it continues to be a regime of a degenerated workers' state. This is a social diagnosis. The political forecast has an alternative character: either the bureaucracy, which is increasingly becoming the organ of the world bourgeoisie in the workers' state, will overturn new forms of ownership and push the country back to capitalism, or the working class will defeat the bureaucracy and open the way to socialism, ”the Transitional Program said.
      30 years ago, Trotsky’s words were fully justified!
  • yes you drive ...
  • Igor Kobernik 28 May 2020 13: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    So, "... you are at least the 7th, but d..ak." Unforgettable A.P. Chekhov ...
  • WILL 7 March 2020 06: 52 New
    • 31
    • 11
    +20
    We must pay tribute to Molotov Vyacheslav Mikhailovich ... Coward - He certainly was not! Just one flight to the Pe-8 to England and America in 1942, what a price! Molotov - Personality of the State Scale! Who and how would not relate to his activities!
    1. Kote Pan Kokhanka 7 March 2020 07: 50 New
      • 17
      • 6
      +11
      Alas, the article was submitted somehow one-sidedly! Molotov was such an interesting personality that it made sense to write a series of articles about his life and work!
      1. Svarog 7 March 2020 08: 15 New
        • 19
        • 8
        +11
        Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
        Alas, the article was submitted somehow one-sidedly! Molotov was such an interesting personality that it made sense to write a series of articles about his life and work!

        Vladislav, if you know some interesting facts, please share, very curious. But in general, only that Molotov, even after the death of Stalin, did not betray himself and his views, already speaks of him as a bold, consistent person, which cannot but arouse respect.
        1. Octopus 7 March 2020 10: 19 New
          • 5
          • 7
          -2
          Quote: Svarog
          Vladislav, if you know some interesting facts, please share, very curious.

          If you are curious, google for a start

          Chuev 140 conversations with Molotov
    2. bionik 7 March 2020 08: 17 New
      • 14
      • 2
      +12
      Quote: ANIMAL
      Just one flight to the Pe-8 to England and America in 1942, what a price!

      Officers of the British Royal Air Force greet the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR V.M. Molotov (1890-1986) after the landing of the heavy Pe-8 bomber (No. 42066), where the Soviet delegation arrived, at the Tealing airport in Scotland. Then Molotov traveled by train to negotiations with the British government in London.
    3. Zeev Zeev 7 March 2020 08: 18 New
      • 15
      • 3
      +12
      Despite his health condition (65 years old), Churchill, in company with British Foreign Ministry official A. Cadogan, who was to accompany him to the scheduled meeting, made a test flight at high altitude using an oxygen mask, after which a conclusion was made about his ability to make a long high-altitude flight.

      Churchill flew to meet with Stalin on the Liberator bomber (tail number AL504) [2] shortly after midnight on August 1, 1942. Making stops for rest and solving some problems in Gibraltar, Cairo and Tehran, he flew from Tehran to Moscow on August 12, arriving in the capital of the USSR at 17:00 after more than a ten-hour flight. [1]
    4. Krasnodar 7 March 2020 09: 11 New
      • 5
      • 4
      +1
      Quote: ANIMAL
      We must pay tribute to Molotov Vyacheslav Mikhailovich ... Coward - He certainly was not! Just one flight to the Pe-8 to England and America in 1942, what a price! Molotov - Personality of the State Scale! Who and how would not relate to his activities!

      Good morning!
      And Joseph Vissarionovich preferred the VIP train to planes)).
      1. Malyuta 7 March 2020 09: 14 New
        • 15
        • 2
        +13
        Quote: Krasnodar
        Good morning!).

        Good morning! good
        Quote: Krasnodar
        And Joseph Vissarionovich preferred the VIP train to planes)).

        To Tehran ?!
        1. Krasnodar 7 March 2020 09: 26 New
          • 7
          • 5
          +2
          No, like in Potsdam))
          The only exception is that he flew to Tehran from Baku, where he reached by train. Traveling overland through Iran was even more dangerous than flying on an airplane - Roosevelt flew there in secret mode. The only nonsense was the former military officer Churchill - this was met with pomp, an official meeting at the airport, etc. )))
    5. knn54 7 March 2020 11: 24 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      Alexey, I agree. He was a true defender of the interests of the Fatherland.
      And he remained an "iron commissar" until the end of his life.
      As for the Jewish wives, read what they were sitting for: one wanted to give Meir a coat (in my opinion of Catherine 2). The second one waved at one of the masterpieces of the Diamond Fund.
      By the way, Polina, Molotov’s wife, ALWAYS said, Stalin was right.
    6. ccsr 12 March 2020 17: 51 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: ANIMAL
      Molotov - Personality of the State Scale! Who and how would not relate to his activities!

      I knew well the man who lived with Molotov in the same house in the 70-80s, in my opinion on Frunzenskaya embankment, or in that area - now I can’t say for sure, because it was a long time ago.
      And this great man lived modestly on retirement, had no attached cars and servants, and he went to the grocery store until the end of his life, where my friend met him constantly, said hello, but of course they were not friends.
      I think that hardly anyone will now see in an ordinary store those who helped Yeltsin or Putin during their reign, not even in the status of minister, but someone as an ordinary assistant from the secretariat or even less rank - they snatched from life something that would never Molotov did not allow himself. These are the people who personify the USSR, even if they were mistaken in something, but their honesty is not in doubt.
  • Egoza 7 March 2020 07: 15 New
    • 15
    • 2
    +13
    Yes, there were people nowadays .....
  • bober1982 7 March 2020 07: 20 New
    • 7
    • 22
    -15
    The role of V.M. Molotov’s restoration of religious life in the USSR is great with regard to the period of the war years and the post-war period. He was a participant in the meeting (1943) of the metropolitans with Stalin, helped to preserve the relics of the saints, and returned them to the Church, carried out a balanced church policy, it was he who it might not seem strange.
    Although, it should be noted that this was done for profit, by the most godless government. Not more than that.
    1. apro 7 March 2020 07: 55 New
      • 14
      • 4
      +10
      Quote: bober1982
      Although, it should be noted that this was done for profit, by the most godless government. Not more than that.

      And you couldn’t explain to Beaver. What does godless power mean? Moreover, the most godless. Godless was not in history. I understand? Thanks.
      1. bober1982 7 March 2020 08: 03 New
        • 6
        • 15
        -9
        Quote: apro
        especially the most godless

        I meant it myselfОth godless power, not withАmy....
        I did not quite correctly put it, I’ll take it into account.
        Quote: apro
        explain what godless power means

        You wonder how she was? Prayers and religious processions, or something, suited.
        1. apro 7 March 2020 08: 10 New
          • 20
          • 6
          +14
          Quote: bober1982
          Prayers and religious processions, or something, suited.

          And what is this for the Soviet government? Having declared freedom of conscience. It has declared faith to be a personal matter of a citizen. I need a citizen to perform religious rituals. This is his personal affair.
          1. bober1982 7 March 2020 09: 18 New
            • 6
            • 17
            -11
            Quote: apro
            declaring freedom of conscience

            I do not know what it is.
            1. fuxila 7 March 2020 11: 48 New
              • 2
              • 5
              -3
              I also have the phrase "freedom of conscience" always caused surprise ... Something like the fact that today I am conscientious, and tomorrow I want and will be unscrupulous ... One leader even freed his soldiers from this chimera called conscience ...
          2. fuxila 7 March 2020 11: 29 New
            • 6
            • 12
            -6
            Declared faith to be a personal matter of a citizen. It is necessary for a citizen to perform religious rituals. This is his personal affair. What is the power here?

            You are just a storyteller ... My great-grandfather, who was shot in 38, recorded in the case that during the meeting, at which he had discussed and the question of celebrating May 1, he said that let's better think about how to celebrate the approaching Easter. The statement turned out to be so seditious that he was soon taken away from the mine in Khabarovsk, from where he had not returned.
            I don’t know how old you are, but when my classmate came to school with a cross that his grandmother gave him, his teacher immediately brought her to the director’s office, and then they called his parents and demanded that she don’t come to the school with a cross, but it was already 85 or 86 year old. And the mass destruction of the clergy, churches and monasteries, many of which were architectural monuments, you probably do not know ...
            1. Hypatius 7 March 2020 12: 11 New
              • 6
              • 3
              +3
              ... was discussed including and the question of celebrating May 1, he said that let's better think about how to celebrate the approaching Easter.
              Confirming fact is competition for people's minds. On the basis of mythological consciousness, the Communists organized their own faith, idols and rituals. The same May 1 - a typical procession under the images of their saints and banners.
              1. Malyuta 7 March 2020 14: 37 New
                • 14
                • 5
                +9
                Quote: Hypatius
                Communists organized their own faith, idols and rituals. The same May 1 - a typical procession under the images of their saints and banners.

                So you wrote a fortune, but what does the ROC do here or do you have to laugh or already cry?
            2. apro 7 March 2020 12: 52 New
              • 4
              • 3
              +1
              Quote: fuxila
              that during the meeting, which was discussed including and the question of celebrating May 1, he said that let's better think about how to celebrate the approaching Easter.

              As I understand it, he expressed it at a party meeting? Or among the believers who discussed how to mark May 1? And what else was written in the case do not share?
              1. fuxila 8 March 2020 08: 08 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                It was a gold mine, where most of the workers were exiled peasants. But in fact, part of the pages was sealed and they allowed me to get acquainted with only a small part. Other peasants also went through the case, in particular, one somewhere in the conversation said that while they lived with God and the king, everything was fine, and now hunger with poor harvests. After the death of Stalin, the wife of one of them filed documents and they were all rehabilitated. At the same time, when studying the circumstances of the case, it was found that torture was applied to the prisoners.
        2. Malyuta 7 March 2020 09: 41 New
          • 16
          • 4
          +12
          Quote: bober1982
          You wonder how she was? Prayers and religious processions, or something, suited


          “The gentlemen from New York America, Wide World News and the Anglo-American News Paper Service are deceiving readers by asserting that Stalin’s forged“ articles ”were not refuted from Moscow at the time. Forged“ articles about USSR’s “air forces” and "reconciliation" with the "Orthodox Church" became known in Moscow at the end of November 1927. They were also exposed by the People’s Commissariat of Foreign Affairs as a fake, as reported to the representative of the Associated Press in Moscow, Mr. Rezvik. sent the following telegram of December 1 to Ass Occupied Press:

          "Today I was told at the People's Commissariat of Foreign Affairs that they are seriously considering the issue of prosecuting in New York against the New York America newspaper and the Hearst newspapers in general in order to put an end to the distribution of articles signed by Stalin. The authorities especially object to the note in" New York by America, dated November 6, under the heading: “Using the Church to Support the Soviets,” which supposedly is Stalin’s secret report at a meeting of the Moscow Presidium. According to the NKID, the articles are pure fabrication. ik, December 1, 1927. "
          1. bober1982 7 March 2020 18: 26 New
            • 4
            • 5
            -1
            You pspuyuyu nesssseta complete, Stalin these Leninist (Trotskyist) fools @ ov "party, completely outplayed.
    2. Svarog 7 March 2020 08: 18 New
      • 24
      • 9
      +15
      Quote: bober1982
      Although, it should be noted that this was done for profit, by the most godless government. Not more than that.

      It is necessary to separate the church and faith in God .. Communism, as an ideology, is much closer to the commandments of Christ than capitalism .. But the church defended capitalism .. Do not find this position strange?
      1. bober1982 7 March 2020 09: 17 New
        • 7
        • 18
        -11
        Quote: Svarog
        But the church defended capitalism ..

        The church does not care about capitalism, nor does socialism.
        This was in the years 20-30, there was terror in relation to the Church on the part of the authorities, but from 1943 to 1948, the policy of the authorities in relation to the Church changed, with the participation of Stalin and Molotov, the outright pogrom and robbery stopped.
        1. Octopus 7 March 2020 10: 25 New
          • 7
          • 14
          -7
          Quote: bober1982
          the policy of authority towards the Church has changed

          Only the comrades had their own church, with black jack and sl the first department and special officers
          1. bober1982 7 March 2020 16: 10 New
            • 3
            • 5
            -2
            Quote: Octopus
            the first department and special officers

            And, with G.G. Karpovyv, including.
            1. Octopus 7 March 2020 21: 00 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: bober1982
              G.G. Karpovyv, including.

              What time - such and Pobedonostsev.
          2. bober1982 7 March 2020 16: 11 New
            • 3
            • 4
            -1
            Quote: Octopus
            Quote: bober1982
            the policy of authority towards the Church has changed

            Only the comrades had their own church, with black jack and sl the first department and special officers

            Quote: Octopus
            Only the comrades had their own church

            Yes
        2. Svarog 7 March 2020 11: 37 New
          • 13
          • 5
          +8
          Quote: bober1982
          The church does not care about capitalism, nor does socialism.

          C'mon .. as supported by the king, inspiring the people that the gentleman or the nobleman is from God, and the serf has such a fate, and now, in pension reform, he supports ..
        3. SOVIET UNION 2 7 March 2020 13: 10 New
          • 7
          • 4
          +3
          The church does not care about capitalism, nor does socialism.
          The church is a very interesting organization. Owning the means of production, propagated the communist ideas of Christ. The 12 commandments of the builder of communism migrated from Orthodoxy. Maybe I don’t know much. But! Connoisseurs of religion! What did Christ drown for? For the exploitation of man by man? For loan interest? What values ​​did Christ preach? Ideas of class superiority of some over others? Calling for financial prosperity and career growth? Was his main value money? Let's say everything was wrong with religion in the USSR. Today in Russia all life according to religious canons?
          1. parusnik 7 March 2020 15: 24 New
            • 8
            • 3
            +5
            SOVIET UNION 2 And the joke is that it seems that Jesus Christ was still an internationalist, he did not propagate the ideas of racial and national superiority ....
    3. Malyuta 7 March 2020 09: 20 New
      • 18
      • 8
      +10
      Quote: bober1982
      Although, it should be noted that this was done for profit, by the most godless government. Not more than that.

      The church should be separated from the state and not impose obscurantism, which is happening now
      "!"All and all oppressive classes need to protect their domination in two social functions: the function of the executioner and the function of the priest. The executioner must suppress the protest and indignation of the oppressed. Sex should console the oppressed, portray them with prospects (this is especially convenient without guaranteeing the “feasibility” of such prospects ...) alleviating disasters and sacrifices while maintaining class domination, and thereby reconcile them with this domination, dare them from revolutionary actions, and undermine their revolutionary mood, destroy their revolutionary resolve "VI Lenin
      1. bober1982 7 March 2020 09: 23 New
        • 6
        • 17
        -11
        Quote: Malyuta
        IN AND. Lenin

        Stalin, by the way, did not think so, and therefore "turned" off the Leninist religious path, since it was a Trotskyist approach to the Church.
      2. fuxila 7 March 2020 11: 45 New
        • 5
        • 6
        -1
        do not plant obscurantism

        Why in VO arrange these fruitless disputes. For me, as an Orthodox, obscurantism is atheism, and as the pastor from the Soviet (watch out) car watch out film remarkably remarked: "We are all believers: only some believe in God, while others do not, but both are unprovable." If this could be proved, then all of us would long ago be either believers or atheists.
        1. Aviator_ 7 March 2020 18: 38 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          You confuse faith and conviction, as Ryazanov presented in his film. Thesis "We are all believers“It’s not true. Believers do not need evidence, but convinced ones need it. Those who are convinced can be dissuaded, but believers can not, they can only be replaced by another faith.
          1. fuxila 8 March 2020 17: 54 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            You confuse faith and conviction

            To be honest, I didn’t understand what you wanted to say. Why did you decide that believers cannot be dissuaded? Read the memoirs of General Gorbatov and he directly writes there that he became an atheist from a very religious person, and what is most sad is that after the Bolsheviks mocked at the graves of Russian saints in Vladimir. The famous writer and mariner Novikov Priboy also turned from a believing village boy into a militant atheist. And vice versa, the history is full of examples of how yesterday's atheist became a believer ...
            1. Aviator_ 8 March 2020 18: 32 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              You can make an unbeliever out of a believer, after the WWII, a lot of people became unbelievers, my grandfather, before that war, a Voronezh peasant who was completely believing, at the end of the 20s, when a detector receiver was brought to the village council, he took up a bottle of vodka to extend the antenna for the receiver from the church dome to village council. And all with a large crowd of people, from which there were shouts of "Antichrist, now God will punish you!" He used vodka in the same place, on the dome, neatly cried, and lived only 91 years, lived to see the beginning of the 80s. This is the question of the transition of believers to unbelievers. There is a reverse transition. And I tried to convey the idea that faith and knowledge are fundamentally different things, everyone chooses his own point of view on the world around him. So the statement of the believer is known: "I believe, for it is absurd." And from his point of view, the believer is right. So the thesis, which the pastor asserts in Ryazanov’s painting, putting on the same platform of faith both believers and unbelievers, is fraudulent.
    4. SOVIET UNION 2 7 March 2020 13: 00 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      Although, it should be noted that this was done for profit, by the most godless government. Not more than that.
      Today they are going to make a mention of God in the constitution. What are you going to do this for?
      1. fuxila 8 March 2020 18: 02 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        This is just like asking why in the Soviet constitution there was a mention of the "Communist Party led by V.I. Lenin." The answer is simple - there was one era, another came ...
        1. SOVIET UNION 2 9 March 2020 15: 43 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Then the party rules. Will God rule now?
          1. fuxila 9 March 2020 16: 46 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            But did someone make such a proposal to the project? Please tell me the name of this person, otherwise it’s very interesting.
  • nikvic46 7 March 2020 07: 46 New
    • 16
    • 2
    +14
    Good girl. At the age of forty, taking such a responsible post says a lot. Yes, he didn’t lose his foresight. He was against the development of virgin lands. He said that if this money was invested in Russian non-black soil, the result would be great. Where is virgin now?
    1. Aviator_ 7 March 2020 18: 41 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quite right, about the virgin lands - this is Khrushchev's impromptu. In the original Stalinist plan for the transformation of nature, it was supposed to invest in the non-black soil, when there were still able-bodied people. Under Brezhnev in the 70s, they tried to raise the non-black soil, but it was already too late.
      1. Aviator_ 8 March 2020 11: 48 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Khrushchevites wound up on the site! Soon the economic councils will begin to extol and will advocate for industrial and rural district committees of the EP.
  • Sergey Nemov 7 March 2020 11: 10 New
    • 12
    • 1
    +11
    Thus, the "tandem" Stalin - Molotov very successfully and competently led the foreign policy of the Soviet state

    It was the best tandem in the history of our state. Neither before nor after there was such a tandem, able to withstand and defend the rights and obligations of the state.
  • Sergey Nemov 7 March 2020 11: 19 New
    • 12
    • 3
    +9
    he became acquainted with Marxism, in 1905 he began to support the Bolsheviks, in 1906 he joined the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party (RSDLP).

    Molotov was a real Bolshevik and a true Leninist! Molotov was a true Communist and went from being an ordinary member of the Bolshevik Party to one of the leaders of the Communist Party of the USSR.
    1. fuxila 8 March 2020 18: 13 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      Molotov was a real Bolshevik and a true Leninist!

      Very pathos, almost like a true Aryan, the character is Nordic ... But if you look, the big question is whether he was a true Leninist, because it was Molotov who was one of the active participants in the destruction of the Leninist guard ...
  • RUSS 7 March 2020 16: 54 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    Thanks to Molotov, a “Molotov cocktail” appeared, this combustible mixture was originally called a “Molotov cocktail” and the Finns came up with it during the Winter War.
    1. Krasnodar 7 March 2020 20: 20 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Aren't the Spanish Republicans?
      1. rich 7 March 2020 21: 20 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Aren't the Spanish Republicans?

        You are absolutely right that a weapon with that name appeared during the Spanish Civil War. But it was not the Republicans who began to apply it first
        In October 1936, bottles filled with gasoline and kerosene in the Madrid area were used as anti-tank weapons by nationalists from the Spanish Legion. The weapon turned out to be effective against the republican tanks T-26 and BT-7. The Francoists called them "cóctel Molotov" (Spanish). Russian translation - a cocktail for Molotov.
        1. Krasnodar 7 March 2020 21: 23 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Thank you, did not know hi
  • Aviator_ 7 March 2020 21: 28 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The only thing that V.M. Molotov could not complete was overseeing our atomic project, after which L.P. Beria began to deal brilliantly with this project.
  • Volgar 7 March 2020 22: 46 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    When Molotov was in exile in Vologda, he played in restaurants on a mandolin to earn money for his life. Molotov loved to read. He spent five to six hours reading every day.
  • iouris 8 March 2020 12: 30 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    I do not agree. Molotov is not a diplomat at all. During this period, the USSR did not have the opportunity to solve problems systematically through diplomatic methods. The first Soviet diplomat was A.A. Gromyko, and the father of this Soviet diplomacy was I.V. Stalin.
  • voyaka uh 8 March 2020 15: 46 New
    • 5
    • 6
    -1
    Molotov failed the 1940 Berlin talks. Which was the reason for the attack of Hitler in 1941.
    Do not be this mace, the war could be delayed for two or three years.
    Stalin gave Molotov a thrashing and sent a letter of apology to Hitler, but it was too late.
    1. iouris 11 March 2020 18: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Molotov failed the 1940 Berlin talks. Which was the reason

      The causes of war are always economic. Only a successful blitzkrieg against the USSR gave Hitler and the Reich a ghostly chance in the upcoming war against the Anglo-Saxons. Hitler's secret negotiations with the British ended in failure, Hess was imprisoned. This meant that about three years remained before the landing of US troops in Europe. The only bridgehead of the USA in the Old World was the good old England. Stalin's strategic task was to prevent Hitler from representing the USSR as an aggressor. He solved this problem, albeit in a "peculiar" way, which suited the Anglo-Saxons.