The United States admitted that they are not fighting against terrorists in Syrian Idlib

The United States admitted that they are not fighting against terrorists in Syrian Idlib

The United States does not cooperate with the militants of the banned terrorist group Khayyat Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jebhat al-Nusra) in Russia, whose armed forces are located in the Syrian province of Idlib, but do not strike at them as they are fighting the regime Assad. This was stated by US Special Representative for Syria James Jeffrey in an interview with CBS.


According to Jeffrey, the United States does not support cooperation with the militants of the former al-Nusra, but they also do not fight against them, since they are focused on the fight against the Syrian government army and are not engaged in international terrorist activities. He stressed that Washington has nothing to do with them, but these terrorists are not a priority target for American strikes.

We do not work with them. (...) On the other hand, as can be seen from our various counter-terrorism attacks in Idlib, we did not inflict them on them, since we do not believe that they are focused on international terrorist activities. Rather, they are focused on fighting the Assad regime.

- said the US special representative.

Thus, one can state the recognition of the United States that their task in Syria is not to fight international terrorism, but to overthrow the Bashar al-Assad government, which Washington has been doing for many years, artificially creating and supporting various terrorist groups.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. KAV
    KAV 6 March 2020 13: 51 New
    • 22
    • 1
    +21
    Tired of these United States. Lied by the most can not. The value of their words / promises has already fallen below zero.
    1. 1976AG 6 March 2020 13: 54 New
      • 19
      • 2
      +17
      It’s just that it’s not possible to pretend that they are fighting the terrorists and admitted it. It remains to admit that oil is not guarded, but stolen, then there will be complete truth.
    2. Mar.Tirah 6 March 2020 14: 01 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: KAV
      Lied by the most can not.

      So it was necessary to say from the very beginning. And then the brains powdered the whole world, here we beat, here we beat. And it won’t it Che Mikhalych ?????
      1. Starover_Z 6 March 2020 15: 32 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Mar. Tira
        Quote: KAV
        Lied by the most can not.

        So it was necessary to say from the very beginning. And then the brains powdered the whole world, here we beat, here we beat. And it won’t it Che Mikhalych ?????

        According to Jeffrey, the United States does not support cooperation with the militants of the former al-Nusra, but they also do not fight against them, since they are focused on the fight against the Syrian government army and are not engaged in international terrorist activities.

        And the war with the legally elected government and the president by certain groups of individuals is not terrorism ?! Two-faced hucksters!
        1. Nyrobsky 6 March 2020 16: 10 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          Quote: Starover_Z
          And the war with the legally elected government and the president by certain groups of individuals is not terrorism ?! Two-faced hucksters!

          The headquarters of any terrorists is located in Washington, but when the terrorists get out of American control and begin to stagger a little “democracy” they automatically get the label “international” ie bad terrorists. In other cases, as with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jebhat al-Nusra), these are good terrorists according to the classification of mattresses. I don’t understand why we recognized the Taliban as a terrorist organization if they did not encroach on St. Basil’s Church, but only dropped two American skyscrapers ...
          1. Azim77 6 March 2020 17: 33 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            get out of American control and begin to reel little "democracy"
            They do not get out of control, but are simply deleted from the payroll. So, therefore, they begin to be indignant, and then the United States “fires” them without severance pay.
    3. tihonmarine 6 March 2020 14: 23 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: KAV
      The strength of their words / promises has already fallen below zero.

      Yes, their promises and words have always been below zero since they appeared on the world map.
    4. rich 6 March 2020 22: 19 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The United States does not cooperate with the militants of the banned in Russia terrorist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jebhat al-Nusra), whose armed forces are located in the Syrian province of Idlib, but do not strike at them, as they are fighting the regime Al-assad
      .
      The interpretation of this report by the State Department is rather twofold. It is not clear who exactly is fighting the Assad regime - the terrorist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or the United States?
      Truth as usual - somewhere in the middle yes
  2. Tzar 6 March 2020 13: 53 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Well, at least a little began to speak directly about their true nature, it pleases.
    1. 1976AG 6 March 2020 13: 59 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      They admitted, as I said, from hopelessness, so there is nothing to rejoice about.
  3. DMB 75 6 March 2020 13: 53 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    The United States does not support cooperation with former al-Nusra militants, but does not fight against them

    They do not fight terrorists themselves, only they interfere with others, and oil is stolen ..
  4. knn54 6 March 2020 13: 54 New
    • 19
    • 1
    +18
    -The United States does not support cooperation with the fighters of the former al-Nusra, but they also do not fight against them, ..
    THIS doesn’t happen, they don’t fight, it means they support. It does not play a direct or indirect role.
    1. tihonmarine 6 March 2020 14: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: knn54
      THIS doesn’t happen, they don’t fight, it means they support. It does not play a direct or indirect role.
      So the terrorists are armed. Not with the old 3 rulers, but with modern automatic weapons, and where they got it from.
  5. Babermetis 6 March 2020 13: 57 New
    • 2
    • 6
    -4
    Since the United States chose Sunites as Muslim allies, they have the right to choose not to strike at Sunni gangs fighting against the Alawite minority, bought 100 years ago by France, who took over part of Turkey and even more so part of the Ottoman Empire.

    In principle, they have such a right.
    1. kot423 6 March 2020 17: 46 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It’s ridiculous. It is enough to recall the former (due to the fault of the mattress) allies of the mattresses - the Kurds.
      1. Babermetis 6 March 2020 18: 18 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        So this is the United States choosing allies for itself, and not for the turn. I don’t see anything funny.
  6. il.dr 6 March 2020 14: 01 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Yes, who would doubt them
  7. tihonmarine 6 March 2020 14: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The United States does not cooperate with the militants of the banned in Russia terrorist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jebhat al-Nusra), whose armed forces are located in the Syrian province of Idlib, but do not strike at them, as they are fighting the regime Assad.
    There was no doubt that the states did not fight against terrorists, for them it was one thing to completely subjugate Syria, whether Assad or anyone else, it was all the more important, the main thing was to establish your own state regime and make Syria a colony.
  8. Ross xnumx 6 March 2020 14: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    According to Jeffrey, the United States does not support cooperation with the fighters of the former al-Nusra, but also do not fight against them, since they focused on the fight against the Syrian government army and do not engage in international terrorist activities.

    Judging by this statement, with any military groups of the US military in Syria, you need to behave like an adversary who illegally invaded sovereign territory - the aggressor. There is no way to do without nuclear weapons. On the territory of the DPRK, Iran there are no American bases ... This once again confirms the thoughts of competent people who claim that in the world they recognize only a strong opponent ...
    It is impossible to force Russia to fight against the American military in Syria (Brzezinski), however, just as to supply the SAA with effective high-precision tactical weapons.
    All the trump cards are in the hands of the American administration.
    Just a stalemate.
  9. Gennady Fomkin 6 March 2020 14: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    laughing There is sincere recognition) It is already possible to sue and demand damages)
  10. opuonmed 6 March 2020 14: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    soon we are waiting for the Terras to go to Damascus
  11. Lord of the Sith 6 March 2020 14: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The United States admitted that they are not fighting against terrorists in Syrian Idlib

    Who would doubt that. They went there so, to pee.
  12. Taras mp 6 March 2020 18: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What was required to prove the terrorists may be different one of our others who are against us well, that is not for s.
  13. NF68 6 March 2020 18: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This was already clear. How did they manage to openly declare this?
  14. ficus2003 6 March 2020 23: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Why is there no link to the original?
    Felts consider us cattle who will not double-check, felts one of two.
  15. VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 7 March 2020 02: 20 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    They are with them. Do not fight. They help them.
  16. Sergey_33 7 March 2020 12: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Everything is as always .. These radishes are ours and therefore children, and these children are not ours and therefore radishes.
  17. Metallurg_2 8 March 2020 10: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    That's right: if you do not fight against the barmaley - then they fight for them. A third is not given there.