The Ministry of Defense showed a video of combat shooting attack aircraft Su-25SM3

The Ministry of Defense showed a video of combat shooting attack aircraft Su-25SM3

In the Stavropol Territory, exercises were conducted with live firing of attack aircraft Su-25SM3 of the Russian Air Force. The video of the exercises on its YouTube channel was posted by the Russian Ministry of Defense.


As noted in the Russian military department, attack aircraft during the exercises practiced striking at targets simulating a column of military equipment, observation posts, and enemy artillery fire control points. Also, special attention was paid to the departure of attack aircraft from the impact of anti-aircraft systems of conditional terrorists.

According to the legend of the exercises that took place at a specialized aviation training ground in the Southern Military District, the weapons of the enemy marched to the starting positions

- said in a statement.


At the end of the exercises, the Su-25CM3 crews made a pair approach to the targets, dropping air bombs to the positions of conditional terrorists, thereby completing the sweep.

Su-25M3 is a further modification of the Su-25CM attack aircraft. On the upgraded machines installed a digital display, which displays the ground and air situation, installed a new fire control system and satellite navigation GLONASS. The combat effectiveness of the machine has improved threefold compared with previous modifications. The aircraft is capable of hitting ground targets from a considerable distance, without entering into visual contact with a target, but only by coordinates.

The aircraft is designed to destroy small-sized mobile and stationary ground objects, as well as low-speed air targets.

Earlier it was reported that up to the level of the Su-25СМ3 it is planned to upgrade the entire existing fleet of Su-25 attack aircraft, including the Su-25СМ.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sergey39 6 March 2020 13: 20 New
    • 6
    • 5
    +1
    In Siri, it was necessary to carry out exercises.
    1. Mikhail Tynda 6 March 2020 13: 50 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      Forgot your advice to ask! Alas, to us sinners.
  2. ultra 6 March 2020 13: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Accurately dropped air bombs?
    1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 13: 29 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      judging by the video, NURs worked
  3. Volga073 6 March 2020 13: 24 New
    • 0
    • 36
    -36
    And what was sycotic in Syria?
    1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 13: 38 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      "only if you put your w .. in the place of the 2nd pilot !! Sir!"
    2. Mikhail Tynda 6 March 2020 13: 49 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Bug didn’t ask you. How is it in Vinnitsa?
  4. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 13: 27 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    as I understand it, the modernization is partial, and it touched only electronic warfare systems, SLAs and Glonass, because I don’t even see what the tidy LCD promised 30 years ago, this remained
  5. iouris 6 March 2020 13: 29 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    The fundamental difference is not visible. The fundamental difference is the destruction of small targets without entering the anti-aircraft defense zone.
    1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 13: 36 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      Sorry, but what you wrote contradicts the work of the attack aircraft, because it consists in the direct support of ground forces on the battlefield
      1. iouris 6 March 2020 13: 39 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Practice shows that over the battlefield, planes tend to go astray. This is not contrary to theory.
        1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 13: 43 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          "our work is both dangerous and difficult," alas, it is the work of attack aircraft, and in war there is always a risk of being shot down, even when landing in the rear
          1. iouris 6 March 2020 14: 47 New
            • 3
            • 3
            0
            Quote: Vitaliy161
            alas she is, the work of attack aircraft

            Look at any problems in terms of the ratio: “result / (combat losses + costs)”. Which object can be destroyed using NURS? And the duration of the attack is such that this aircraft can be guaranteed to be shot down (for example, from the DShK, and Vitebsk is useless). In this case, the pilot will die, and this is the main "detail".
            1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 14: 54 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              so from this point of view, attack aircraft, what the doctor ordered, and to bring down Grach from DShK, you know this task for yourself ... but if you still knew how they work, you would understand what to shoot from DShK in Gracha, is to sign yourself a death sentence
              1. iouris 6 March 2020 21: 12 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Quote: Vitaliy161
                knock down Grach from DShK, you know this task for yourself ... and if you still knew how they work

                I personally knew the Hero of the Soviet Union, Lieutenant Colonel A.N. Levchenko, who in Afghanistan had just died from the DShK, performing a combat mission to support the battalion of paratroopers, who needed to crush the machine gun nest. True, the aircraft was a MiG-23ml, but in this case it is not essential. MiG-23ml allowed to drop bombs with diving angles of up to 40 degrees. and was used specifically to destroy point targets.
                True, the form said that he "repeated the feat of Gastello," but we then understand why. This does not detract from the exploit of Lieutenant Colonel A.N. Levchenko, who sacrificed his life to carry out the combat mission set by the command. The experience of war should be known and not allowed to repeat mistakes.
                1. Vitaly161 7 March 2020 18: 53 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  not a damn thing to yourself !!! to edit you compared the MiG-23 and Su-25, it’s a pancake how to compare the Lada Vest and T-90, and you can destroy this and that, by what means, you can no longer answer, with your knowledge aviation everything is very clear, they are scarce
            2. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 14: 57 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              [quote = iouris Which object can be destroyed using NURS? [/ quote] anything, the nomenclature of this type of weaponry is vast you know
        2. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 14: 06 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          here where do you come from such "practices"? war is war, soldiers and officers die on it, so it is, and it will be so in the near future, or according to your CM3, it’s just because of electronic warfare that they increase survivability for working on the battlefield? At least read about modernization
      2. Alexey RA 6 March 2020 18: 43 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Vitaliy161
        Sorry, but what you wrote contradicts the work of the attack aircraft, because it consists in the direct support of ground forces on the battlefield

        It’s only from the experience of Afghanistan that it became clear that direct support of the ground forces on the battlefield is best carried out by bullets from afar. And in the case of using cast iron or NAR, you need to dump this wealth in one or two calls, and then leave. For with each approach, the probability of being hit by air defense systems increased by several times.
        In the same regions, after the appearance of MANPADS, attack aircraft were generally prohibited from dropping below 4500 m.
        1. iouris 7 March 2020 12: 38 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Alexey RA
          dump this wealth in one or two calls

          The chances of survival are only those who make only one call. Hence the significance of high-precision weapons on the principle of "letting them in and forget", Generalissimo A.V. Suvorov also taught Russians: "A bullet is a fool, a bayonet (high-precision weapons) is great!"
          1. Vitaly161 7 March 2020 19: 03 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            connoisseur of the 300th lv, do not enter the air defense zone, and this is 250-300 km and I fired and fired shells, did you even understand what kind of nonsense you are carrying ??
        2. Vitaly161 7 March 2020 18: 57 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          and nevertheless, they worked below 4500 because there was a need, in the same place in Afghanistan, and also in Chechnya, the Su-25 earned fame, an extremely tenacious machine that brought home even after 2-3 direct hits from MANPADS
          1. garri-lin 7 March 2020 19: 26 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Proof of 2-3 hits and a safe return is possible?
            1. Vitaly161 7 March 2020 19: 36 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              During the cadet years (my) veterans of Afghanistan visited us, and Chechnya provided photos and videos, along with the context of what, how and where it arrived, of course the information was not for everyone
              1. garri-lin 7 March 2020 19: 40 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Tales of Grandmother Arminush, retold by Vartanush Zamanushevna. Clear.
                1. Vitaly161 7 March 2020 19: 48 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv42XI9sT2E смотреть с 29й минуты,вы каким боком к авиации относитесь?что беретесь критиковать?

                  the pilot was unlucky here, flew into both engines
                  1. garri-lin 8 March 2020 18: 07 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    There is nothing there to continue the flight after a double hit. The man specifically said. You can’t fly without engines. Have to catapult. Gone from the city. You originally spoke about returning to your home airfield after several hits. There was no such thing. Fairy tales.
    2. dauria 6 March 2020 14: 24 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      destruction of small targets without entering the anti-aircraft defense zone.


      From what depth and to what depth from LF are you going to do aviation training and support for an attack or defense? At least read the general infantry tactics. How without risk hammering a target at a depth of, say, 150 km and not substitute for air defense?
      1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 15: 02 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        thank you, at least someone supported
      2. iouris 7 March 2020 16: 44 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: dauria
        How to hammer the target without risk ... and not substitute for air defense?

        Watching how to "substitute." If military operations of the kind of aviation are unsatisfactory organized, then the ground forces will continue to fight without air support: they will either knock out the aircraft or leave it on the ground before taking measures to reduce the enemy’s air defense capabilities. This was clearly visible in Syria.
        1. Vitaly161 7 March 2020 18: 59 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          and when did the Syrian air force stop working? even after 3 downed cars, they continued to work without slowing down
  6. Orkraider 6 March 2020 13: 30 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    All hi
    It would be great if all of Su 25 went through modernization. They’re doing it rhythmically, but I haven’t found the info on the count on the contact for modernization. Let's hope that the maximum is really driven away. An indispensable, in the foreseeable future, attack aircraft.
    It’s good that they fly constantly in studies, professionalism will not appear out of nowhere.

    Amused the eyelid about weapons, which itself made the march. laughing laughing
    According to legend, the exercises that took place at a specialized aviation training ground in South-Eastern Military District, Armament the enemy made a march to the starting position

    - said in a statement.
  7. carstorm 11 6 March 2020 13: 33 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    But this modification does not have digital displays? In my opinion this is not CM3.
    1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 13: 44 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      on take-off and on the video as a whole it’s definitely not CM3, Vitebsk is not visible, digital displays
      1. kit88 6 March 2020 14: 56 New
        • 10
        • 1
        +9
        Comrades, dear.
        But what’s that sparka? The shooting is conducted with the Su-25UBM.
        This is not CM, not CM3.
        What displays are you looking for?
        1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 14: 58 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          that's why I was surprised, because I saw the rook live, felt it) I’ve already figured it out, see the posts below)
    2. Orkraider 6 March 2020 13: 45 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      hi
      I agree with you.
      The video from the cabin is incomprehensible, photo CM3 below:

      1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 13: 50 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        This is another matter) not weak so the tidy has actually changed
  8. SID
    SID 6 March 2020 13: 34 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Class! We want more!
    Give the gun a job !!! soldier
    1. Vitaly161 6 March 2020 13: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      a bewitching sight is very, especially when you watch it all from the ground
  9. zippy99 6 March 2020 13: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Beautiful birds! Is it just CM3? I did not see digital displays on the video.
  10. tlauicol 6 March 2020 13: 44 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    There was another episode where he knocks down Su Pturs 24
  11. iouris 6 March 2020 13: 44 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Shooting is not "combat", but "combat training."
  12. Adimius38 6 March 2020 17: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    In the video, the usual su-25 with outdated avionics. Then the su-25cm3 doesn't even smell