"Tomahawks" for the US Marine Corps: how it is planned to use missiles


In the United States, they named the first type of troops that can receive the ground version of the famous Tomahawk cruise missile after the termination of the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate and Shorter Range Missiles.


Most likely, the first ground-based missiles will fall into the possession of the US Marine Corps. Despite the fact that mainly missiles are intended for use against ground targets, the command of the US Marine Corps expects to use the Tomahawks to strike at enemy ships.

General David Hillary Berger, Commander of the United States Marine Corps, presented his plan for the use of anti-ship missiles at a meeting of the US Congress on March 5, 2020. He asked for $ 125 million from the United States budget for the purchase of 48 Tomahawk missiles, which would go into service with the Marine Corps.

General Berger emphasizes that the US marines will in the foreseeable future become part of an integrated naval force and will participate in the control of sea space and naval operations against enemy ships. Small squads of marines, according to the commandant of the corps, will attack enemy ships using Tomahawk missiles from the ship or from the shore.

It is not yet known what kind of missiles will go into service with the US Marine Corps. But most likely it is about MST - a sub-version of Block V, or TACTOM, also known as Block Va missiles. MST, in particular, has a new multi-mode guidance system, including an infrared imaging sensor, radio frequency guidance and GPS navigation. Also, the rocket has a two-way data line that allows you to adjust course and aiming during the flight.

Raytheon, under a contract with the US Navy, at one time began to create a naval version of the Tomahawk, which led to the emergence of the MST program. The missile can be used both from submarines and from surface ships. But the Marine Corps will have to develop a ground-based launcher to launch Tomahawk missiles.

In August 2019, tests were already conducted to launch a rocket from the ground, more precisely - from a special installation, but, according to many experts, the installation that was demonstrated by the Pentagon is clearly experimental and needs further and very large-scale improvement.

Well-known expert Joseph Trevitik believes that one of the solutions for marines can be the adaptation of launchers of the high mobility artillery missile M142 (HIMARS) to launch MST missiles.

Terrestrial anti-ship missile systems will provide anti-ship fires from land as part of a comprehensive naval war against land war,

said General Berger, commandant of the Marine Corps, speaking to Congress.

It should be noted that recently, interest in anti-ship means has been growing in the American armed forces. Obviously, this is due to the growth of the naval power of China and Russia - the main strategic opponents of the United States in the oceans.


To counter enemy ships, it is planned to use not only the surface and submarine fleet itself and the sea Aviation, but also the units of the Marine Corps, which are generally considered in the United States as "universal soldiers" capable of performing almost any task in the framework of ensuring national security and defense.

The most promising theater of operations in the United States is considered to be the Asia-Pacific region, where a conflict is brewing in the South China Sea between China and several Asian states claiming the disputed Spratly archipelago. Taiwan is also a problem point in this region: it is clear that Beijing has no plans to return the island to China. Therefore, for the US military command, the arming of marines with missiles seems to be a very reasonable and urgent task.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. rocket757 6 March 2020 10: 30 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    But what about aviation, which always had the function to THRAT PROTECT DO NOT ALLOW ???
    The rocket manufacturer has nowhere to go ???
    Although ... this is probably a new word in the tactics of the actions of the Yankees, probably ???
    1. vvvjak 6 March 2020 10: 36 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: rocket757
      Although ... this is probably a new word in the tactics of the actions of the Yankees, probably ???

      So to be trifled, it is necessary for them to put on the armament of the US Marines "Minutemen". This will be a new word.
      1. rocket757 6 March 2020 10: 50 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Toli still will be oh oh oh!
    2. Kalmar 6 March 2020 11: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: rocket757
      But what about aviation, which always had the function to THRAT PROTECT DO NOT ALLOW ???

      One doesn’t interfere with the other.
      1. rocket757 6 March 2020 12: 27 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Chasing two birds with one stone ... including, it is very expensive, but at the expense of a positive \ desired result, oh, it does not always work.
        1. Kalmar 6 March 2020 13: 11 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: rocket757
          Chasing two birds with one stone ... including, it is very expensive, but at the expense of a positive \ desired result, oh, it does not always work.

          At the moment, they have enough resources to drive a whole flock of hares. Then, “Tomahawks” and PU under them - long-established products; to close on their base the next modification should not be very expensive.
          1. rocket757 7 March 2020 11: 47 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Kalmar
            At the moment, they have enough resources,

            They themselves do not hide the fact that they are forced to tick out quite a lot ... unnecessary. This is for good reason.
            They are rich guys, but they do not have infinite resources either.
        2. maidan.izrailovich 7 March 2020 13: 18 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          ...it is very expensive...

          Expensive for those who make money. And for those who simply print them there is no such thing.
          1. rocket757 7 March 2020 13: 26 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Ha, just printing is dangerous, you need Schaub they are provided with at least something, or attach / change them to something material, recognized as material and valuable.
            Bucks are a liquid commodity, but it is also not without utmost.
            Of course it’s not for us to teach or criticize them, they are masters in this matter, but keep in mind that everything happens to be finite, all of a sudden.
  2. Masha 6 March 2020 10: 31 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    requested to allocate from the budget of the United States $ 125 million ....

    Key phrase ... wink
  3. knn54 6 March 2020 11: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But after only half a month after leaving the Treaty, the Yankees successfully launched the ground version of the ax.
    And the corps of marine infantry in number (130000) and in equipment will give odds to many armies in the world, including the European ones.
    1. Kalmar 6 March 2020 12: 00 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: knn54
      But after only half a month after leaving the Treaty, the Yankees successfully launched the ground version of the ax.

      The thing is simple: the "tomahawk" before the INF Treaty seemed to already know how to start from the ground.
  4. Ros 56 6 March 2020 13: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How how. As usual, you take the handle and throw it at the enemy. So always threw axes. fellow laughing