A video of the bombing of military transport aircraft Il-76MD appeared on the Web

A video of the bombing of military transport aircraft Il-76MD appeared on the Web

A video of practical bombing and firing of cannons from the crews of military transport aircraft Il-76MD appeared on the Web. The video was posted by the Russian Ministry of Defense on its official YouTube channel.


As explained in the military department, the crews of military transport aircraft worked off the discharge of radio beacons and night illumination bombs to indicate the aiming point and the subsequent landing of the airborne assault. The bombing was practiced both in the daytime and at night. The exercises were held at the Kushalino training ground in the Tver Region; airplanes from the formations of the Western Military District took part in them.

After the bombing, the crews fired firing cannons at lightly armored targets.


Practical bombing was carried out from four thousand meters during the day and 600 meters at night, live firing was carried out at altitudes of about 400 meters. The accuracy of the use of aerial bombs was provided by the regular sighting and navigation system of IL-76 aircraft

- said in a statement.

The Ministry of Defense called these exercises "unique for this type of aviation".

Note that the Il-76MD military transport aircraft have four pylons under each wing, which can carry 4 P-50T bombs, instead of lighting transporters can fully use warheads.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Maz
    Maz 5 March 2020 18: 36 New
    • 10
    • 4
    +6
    And if six containers with ammunition of a volume explosion * are dropped from a ramp *? Is that a hint to the Turks?
    1. Dmitry Donskoy 5 March 2020 18: 48 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      But what, in the Second World War everything that flew and traveled could have fought. soldier
    2. Romario_Argo 5 March 2020 18: 55 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      drop six containers with ammunition volumetric explosion *?

      only if, and again, as an option -
      to throw ODAB-76 bombs from the IL-1500 using an exhaust parachute through the rear hatch-ramp
      although the pylons using SVP Hephaestus accuracy is higher, but the number is limited to 6 bombs
      so you can leisurely from a height of 10 km., from 10 approaches from 6 point and up to 20 on the areas of ODAB-1500 to throw MODERATE
      1. seregatara1969 5 March 2020 21: 05 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        And if a heap from a ramp of 50 kg pallets from a height of 10 km: what is the area loosened? Again the gophers will have a headache. Well, as an option, huh?
        1. Romario_Argo 5 March 2020 21: 56 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          it’s not tactically and economically expedient, well, of course, gophers are a pity
    3. rich 5 March 2020 23: 41 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Maz: And if six containers with ammunition of a volume explosion * are dropped from a ramp *? Is that a hint to the Turks?

      And if you reset it? smile We’ll induce fear. All human rights defenders will howl yes
  2. NICK111 5 March 2020 18: 37 New
    • 10
    • 2
    +8
    And what's the point of bombing a transporter?
    He actually has other tasks.
    1. Lopatov 5 March 2020 19: 00 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: NICK111
      And what's the point of bombing a transporter?
      He actually has other tasks.

      1. Observer2014 5 March 2020 19: 40 New
        • 13
        • 4
        +9
        Yeah of course. yes laughing Have you noticed at least a hint of such ammunition on the Video from the video article of the IL 76 bombing? What did you present in your video? And there is nothing close. The all-devastating fire from the stern art installation of IL 76 was especially touched laughing They even throw blanks with the help of the antediluvian regular sighting and navigation system of the IL-76 negativeOr make a real flying ganship! Or do not disgrace a good transport car! The Russian army needs flying special forces in the form of ganships. Not much. Five. But that it was really super effective !.
        1. Lopatov 5 March 2020 20: 52 New
          • 6
          • 5
          +1
          Quote: Observer2014
          What did you present in your video? And there is nothing close.

          Are you absolutely sure about this?

          Quote: Observer2014
          The all-devastating fire from the stern art of the IL 76 installation was especially touched

          Great option
          Allows you to "clean up" the landing pad for paratroopers.
          Bombing performs similar functions.
          1. Observer2014 5 March 2020 22: 18 New
            • 6
            • 7
            -1
            Great option
            Allows you to "clean up" the landing pad for paratroopers.
            Bombing performs similar functions.
            laughing Lopatov. Have you ever served in the army? : wink:
            1. Lopatov 5 March 2020 23: 11 New
              • 5
              • 2
              +3
              Quote: Observer2014
              Lopatov. Have you ever served in the army?

              Naturally.
              And you?
              After such "arguments" inevitably the question arises
          2. Nikolaevich I 6 March 2020 01: 39 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Quote: Spade
            The all-devastating fire from the stern art of the IL 76 installation was especially touched

            Great option
            Allows you to "clean up" the landing pad for paratroopers.

            Well, that’s too much (!) ... about the “excellent option” for “clearing” the landing pad!
        2. seregatara1969 5 March 2020 21: 07 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Also an option! You never know what.
          1. Observer2014 5 March 2020 23: 09 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            Quote: seregatara1969
            Also an option! You never know what.

            Nothing. Have you cleared landing sites a lot with IL 76? Well! Shovels I am waiting for your reply. Answer do not be shy. wink This garbage was printed back in the late 80s. In "Wings of the Motherland".
            I spoke and I say. Russia needs a full-fledged flying ganship, Like a flying special forces.
            1. Lopatov 5 March 2020 23: 17 New
              • 4
              • 3
              +1
              Quote: Observer2014
              How many IL 76 cleared landing sites?

              But this is a completely different question. No landing - no need to clear the site.

              Anticipating the following profound statement, the Strategic Missile Forces have also never been used.
              But they, too, should not be disbanded, like the Airborne Forces

              In the meantime, there is the Airborne Forces and while there is the possibility of parachute landing, it is necessary to work it out. Including stripping the site.

              Accessible enough?
              1. Observer2014 5 March 2020 23: 29 New
                • 6
                • 2
                +4
                Quote: Spade
                Quote: Observer2014
                How many IL 76 cleared landing sites?

                But this is a completely different question. No landing - no need to clear the site.

                Anticipating the following profound statement, the Strategic Missile Forces have also never been used.
                But they, too, should not be disbanded, like the Airborne Forces

                In the meantime, there is the Airborne Forces and while there is the possibility of parachute landing, it is necessary to work it out. Including stripping the site.

                Accessible enough?

                And what about the article?
                A video of the bombing of military transport aircraft Il-76MD appeared on the Web
                Remember? wink And where did our polemic begin? With your opinion, transport aviation is something wow laughing Yes, garbage is complete. Not the topic of this article. And the pseudo possibilities of good transport are IL 76. That's all I wanted to say.
                1. Lopatov 5 March 2020 23: 44 New
                  • 3
                  • 1
                  +2
                  Quote: Observer2014
                  And what about the article?

                  About bombing with IL-76
                  Moreover, for the gifted it was indicated that lighting bombs were used.
                  That is, in its purest form, ensuring the landing.

                  Quote: Observer2014
                  Do you remember? wink And where did our polemic begin? With your opinion, transport aviation is something wow

                  And she is oh-hoo. Able to use the most powerful non-nuclear ammunition in the world

                  And it all started with the BLU-82B Daisy Cutter bomb
                  Which, suddenly, was used from military transport aircraft and later from transport helicopters and purposefully. designed to clear landing sites and landing sitesя

                  Both the American "mother of all bombs" and our "father" are just a continuation of the idea of ​​"Daisy Mower"
                  1. Lopatov 5 March 2020 23: 48 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Spade
                    from the bomb BLU-82B "Daisy Cutter"

                  2. g1washntwn 6 March 2020 07: 29 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    So our AVBPM was most likely pulled out of transport through a ramp, the Tu-160 bomb bay was opened only for MO-video.
            2. businessv 5 March 2020 23: 29 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: Observer2014
              This garbage was printed back in the late 80s. In "Wings of the Motherland".

              And we in 1978 on Emba tested the Osu, which was secret at that time, about which very few people heard today, and we covered it for every flight of the "partner" satellite! Times are changing, weapons and tactics are changing, why should the forum users be rude and rude and get personal?
      2. 6erJIblu 5 March 2020 20: 36 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Do you want to drive “Dad” off the couch? :)
      3. figwam 5 March 2020 22: 09 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        For every mom, there is a dad.
    2. Alexey RA 5 March 2020 19: 19 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: NICK111
      And what's the point of bombing a transporter?
      He actually has other tasks.

      The legacy of Soviet times - then BTA planes were planned to be used as ersatz bombers.
      In practice, the most famous "transport bomber" was bomb An-12, used in Ethiopia and in the Indo-Pakistani wars as a “carpet bomber” with dropping bombs from the cargo compartment. Fortunately, the equipment allowed it, yes ...
      Bomber weapons include:
      2 photographic bombs FOTAB-100-80 or 2 night reference and signal bombs NOSAB-100 or 2 day reference and signal bombs DOSAB-100 for dropping from beam holders;
      6 color target-signal aerial bombs TsOSAB-10 or 6 night reference-naval aerial bombs OMAB-25-8N or 6 daytime reference-naval aerial bombs ОМАБ-25-12Д or 6 radio probes for dropping from a box holder ДЯ-SS-АТ;
      70 bombs of 100 kg caliber (OFAB, ZAB) or 29-32 bombs of 250 kg caliber (OFAB, ZAB, PTAB, RBC) or 18-22 bombs of 500 kg caliber (FAB, ZAB, FZAB, RBC) or 18 UDM-500 aircraft for dropping from the conveyor TG-12MB.
      1. zyablik.olga 6 March 2020 00: 18 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Alexey RA
        The legacy of Soviet times - then BTA planes were planned to be used as ersatz bombers.


        There was an article on this subject
        Antonov Bombers
        https://topwar.ru/92231-bombardirovschiki-antonova.html
      2. Nikolaevich I 6 March 2020 01: 27 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Alexey RA
        The legacy of Soviet times - then BTA planes were planned to be used as ersatz bombers.

        Yes, even, and not very ersatz! I once read an article claiming that the well-known An-124 Ruslan transporters were “optionally” designed as carriers of the X-55 cruise missiles ...
    3. Piramidon 5 March 2020 23: 20 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: NICK111
      And what's the point of bombing a transporter?

      It seems to be written in the article
      As explained in the military department, the crews of military transport aircraft worked off the discharge of radio beacons and night illumination bombs to indicate the aiming point and the subsequent landing of the airborne assault.
    4. Starover_Z 5 March 2020 23: 44 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: NICK111
      And what's the point of bombing a transporter?
      He actually has other tasks.

      But no one expects such bombing "outbreaks" from him and, accordingly, will not hide!
  3. RVAPatriot 5 March 2020 18: 45 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    This is a hint that accidentally flying over Paris ... And put a mini-gun on it in addition, and you get the Amer’s spectrum (AS-130) ... the machine itself is for controlling the battlefield, if the defense systems work effectively, as in advertising
    1. Pete mitchell 5 March 2020 18: 57 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Aircraft of equal AS-130 in the VKS is clearly not enough, it would be useful
      1. Voltsky 5 March 2020 20: 20 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        Aircraft of equal AS-130 in the VKS is clearly not enough, it would be useful

        why, there were tasks of churkobess in the deserts / jungle to drive? Or for what would it be?
        1. Pete mitchell 5 March 2020 20: 24 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Well, at least in order to be able to qualitatively support ground groups when there are no other resources at hand. Do you know this happens ...
          1. Voltsky 5 March 2020 20: 34 New
            • 13
            • 0
            +13
            Are you talking about an attack aircraft? because it’s the stormtroopers who are doing what you’re talking about ... but ganship, they’re chasing barmales without anti-aircraft missile systems, and as far as I remember, all the competitors of the Russian Federation in dangerous political business have anti-aircraft missiles.
            1. Pete mitchell 5 March 2020 20: 52 New
              • 5
              • 2
              +3
              Caesar Caesarean: stormtroopers - to storm, but there is a place gunship. My classmate once took a surrounded group, the weather and geography did not allow the use of aviation: he took a chance, a helicopter to write offbut all thank God returned. The same spooky is a powerful reconnaissance platform that can provide itself with information, well, and decent weaponry. For me, a couple of dozen would be useful, of course, an armada is not needed
              1. Voltsky 5 March 2020 20: 58 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                Quote: Pete Mitchell
                weather and geography did not allow the use of aviation: he took a chance, the helicopter was written off

                Cognitive dissonance, haven’t heard? :) But maybe I just didn’t understand your literary turn ...

                That is, in a situation where it was impossible to use aviation, a ganship, which cannot be used, would be useful, and of course it would be written off; Did I understand everything correctly?

                And the reconnaissance platform is sort of called Orion.

                You tell me the tasks, and the place where it would be useful rather than stories from life, because stories from life are sometimes terrible but isolated, and the technique for individual tasks is not done.
                1. Pete mitchell 5 March 2020 21: 06 New
                  • 5
                  • 1
                  +4
                  Probably intricately put it: gunship itself can collect information and hammer it without visual contact.
                  Then there was no such opportunity: the helicopter took a chance and took the group, the Lord looked after them ..., he is still walking in parades.
                  1. Voltsky 5 March 2020 21: 08 New
                    • 4
                    • 0
                    +4
                    Well, that was what I needed to prove :) you just like the concept itself, by the way, too ...

                    But it makes little sense, at least for the moment.
                    1. Pete mitchell 5 March 2020 21: 39 New
                      • 4
                      • 0
                      +4
                      Quote: Voletsky
                      it makes little sense, at least for the moment.

                      I like the idea, but let me disagree with you: they would be useful. Do you have blue shoulder straps? Here, by and large, you need guys who legs on the groundask. I think their opinion is more justified, let's say ..
                      PS It is very strange, but your previous koment did not see immediately in full.
                      Quote: Voletsky
                      And the reconnaissance platform is sort of called Orion.

                      Are you talking about the P-3 family? Was there ever an opportunity with the guys from the Special Forces hercy or at least J-them talk? So here is one topic about which they will not speak categorically: Reb and counter equipment. Spooky is completely independent for search and destruction
                      1. Voltsky 5 March 2020 21: 52 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        I'm generally a cynical Baltic states, I like military equipment like all the "boys", so here I am: well, if so, briefly :)

                        The kids on the ground would say that they wouldn’t be happy to encounter a situation where they might need any support other than the one that the wife can provide :)

                        Well, since we are talking about "fantasies" and about what seems to us to be useful without infantry, it seems to me that an extra-heavy UAV would be a more suitable option, IL-112 in the form of a shock battery or something similar ...
                      2. Pete mitchell 5 March 2020 22: 09 New
                        • 4
                        • 0
                        +4
                        Baltics from where?
                        Quote: Voletsky
                        The kids on the ground would say that they would not be happy to encounter that situation at all ...
                        This is a priori, we suppose, the Lord disposes: such a service.
                        Quote: Voletsky
                        I'm generally a cynical Baltic states, I like military equipment like all the "boys" ...

                        Therefore, one should be interested in the opinion tightly tied on this. If I’m not mistaken, the first special Combat Talon fixed the entire region of your eastern border a year like that in '97
                      3. Voltsky 5 March 2020 22: 21 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        1. Latvia
                        2. God has nothing to do with it
                        3. The opinion of those who are tightly tied in something is taken into account, but not as a basis; in life, unfortunately, there are priorities and desire, and there are opportunities.
                        Not one of 3 does not respond positively to the fact that you need ganship
                        4. Do we have here about ganships, and about their theoretical application in a modern theater? or you decided to focus on the Baltic states, do not jump like in a pan.
                      4. Pete mitchell 5 March 2020 22: 37 New
                        • 4
                        • 1
                        +3
                        Quote: Voletsky
                        here about ganshipy
                        They would not be superfluous in a modern theater: guys on earth would be happy to use it if necessary, practice shows that the experience of amers, for example. It should be clear to you in the Baltic states: on average, 200 days in the clouds, all the same, it is not always possible to use CAS and FAC. Opportunity, priorities, desire .. these questions are for top management and the breakdown skills of responsible people.
                        Quote: Voletsky
                        don’t jump like a pan.
                        Not correct
                      5. Voltsky 5 March 2020 22: 53 New
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        +2
                        Americans iron Barmalei without MANPADS, not to mention the SAM; do you even theoretically have such opponents? It’s just that the Su-25 and Mi-24/35 currently carry out the whole spectrum of tasks to suppress the centers of resistance. Ganship - a weapon against the partisans; but I will note as no one who is not much familiar with the installation of equipment on different platforms; a group of several people can install a low-ballistic smooth-bore gun on a plane with minimal alteration of the hull, give only a project. And if this still has not happened, this is not required, with which I absolutely agree ...
                        ps it’s not necessary about the Baltic states, I don’t discuss mine with strangers, and don’t condemn strangers as a guest :)
                      6. Pete mitchell 5 March 2020 23: 08 New
                        • 4
                        • 1
                        +3
                        Quote: Voletsky
                        a group of several people can install a low-ballistic smooth-bore gun on a plane with minimal alteration of the hull, give only a project.

                        Project, a mere trifle. Sorry, but it seems to me you are not very familiar with the capabilities of modern spooky. Installing artillery is not a problem, besides a variety of search equipment, fire control, integrate all this together; add more rap, connect, achieve compatibility ... tactics in the same place.
                        Maybe these planes are not, but why This is a question from another plane.
                      7. Voltsky 5 March 2020 23: 16 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        but I will note as no one who is not much familiar with the installation of equipment on different platforms; a group of several people can install a low-ballistic smooth-bore gun on a plane with minimal alteration of the hull, give only a project.

                        I needed to list the rest of the equipment too!! :) As if, what I called the most difficult, because you need to take into account the strength characteristics of the case, etc. etc. Everything else is electronics, which does not affect LTX, the main thing is that the platform would just meet the needs of capacity and load capacity.

                        So the counter question, do you exactly understand what you are talking about and want?! :)

                        this is the logic of a arguing woman or child, here it is, but he / she, and if so or vice versa ... No, this will not work.

                        My answer was enclosed in the first 2 counter-arguments, and then the already tiring demagogy; forgive me :) All the best and goodbye.
                      8. Pete mitchell 5 March 2020 23: 28 New
                        • 4
                        • 1
                        +3
                        Glad for your confidence - go ahead, though ...
                        Have you seen gunship except in the pictures? I like praetorian, just by here ...
                        Quote: Voletsky
                        don't jump like already in the pan.
                        - two, but the thought is correct. Good night
                      9. Voltsky 5 March 2020 23: 33 New
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        -1
                        Here you are stubborn, I am engaged in modernization projects and installation of any kind; without specifics if you allow :)
                        And I get very angry when they try to say or teach me something, which partly concerns my work.

                        Quote: Pete Mitchell
                        - two,

                        Es no Latvijas, man drikst, kaut vai mana dzimta valoda - krievu :)
                        I can briefly
                      10. Pete mitchell 6 March 2020 09: 19 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        Quote: Voletsky
                        Es no Latvijas, man drikst ..

                        But I, the sinner, always considered the Balts restrained and not suffering from conceit, I was probably mistaken. Are you working outside the building at the exit of the Cable-stayed Bridge? Are you the type at work here? Well, yes, your business
                        Quote: Voletsky
                        kaut vai dzimta valoda - krievu
                        sad
                        Thanks for your usefull input .., well, to be correct
  • Thunderbolt 5 March 2020 18: 53 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    If the enemy does not have anti-tank weapons, an armored personnel carrier can support its troops with fire.
    It is logical to assume that in the absence of enemy air defense, an air conveyor can support its airborne paratroopers with beacons and luminous bombs.
    1. 6erJIblu 5 March 2020 20: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The first one. Not armored personnel carrier and BMD. And the second, if it is possible to land, it means the enemy’s air defense has already been suppressed or can not oppose anything. And the third coming out of the first two. ATGM crushed from the air.
    2. Voltsky 5 March 2020 21: 20 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      rather, it’s just a training, and partly experimental ..
  • sedoj 5 March 2020 19: 13 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The title of the article is very ambiguous. Maybe, after all, "bombing by military transport aircraft." And it turns out that instead of bombs, airplanes dropped. what
    1. Petio 5 March 2020 19: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      During the Iran-Irsk war, the Il-76 of the Iraqi Air Force bombed Iranian infantry at the front line with 6000 m
    2. Voltsky 5 March 2020 22: 36 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      why not ?! A psychological attack, like motros on zebras lying in trenches and shooting with zebras standing.
  • tlauicol 5 March 2020 19: 28 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Light armored vehicles have their own guns. Who will let him pass this way and then fire?
  • 7,62h54 5 March 2020 19: 59 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    It is archaic to use hulking heavyweights for bombing even from 4000 meters, not to mention 600. They will plant it from the ground so that mom does not grieve.
  • Grigory_45 5 March 2020 20: 19 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Il-76MD military transport aircraft have four pylons under each wing, which can carry 4 P-50T bombs
    on each of the four pylons of the IL-76 can be suspended by a bomb with a caliber of up to 500 kg. Bombing can be carried out both automatically from the Dome system, and from the NKBP-7.

    In general, all Soviet transporters could be used as ersatz bombers. Starting from an-2

    and ending with the An-12 (which had OPB-1R and NKPB-7 sights and the RBP-2 panoramic radar to determine the drop point of cargo out of sight of the earth, and could take up to 70 bombs of 100 kg caliber, or 22 bombs of 500 kg caliber, or 18 sea ​​mines)

    An-12s were used as bomber by the Indian Air Force during the war with Pakistan in 1971, and, according to the Indians, their effectiveness was higher than those in service with Canberra. Moreover, Annushka had no losses.
    An-12 was also noted during the Ethiopian-Eretrian conflict and in Angola
    1. Avior 5 March 2020 20: 44 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      When I inserted my own, yours saw smile
      add - An-2 is firing nurses
  • Avior 5 March 2020 20: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    This is what.
    There were strike attack aircraft and abruptly smile

    weaponry
    Unguided missiles: 2 RO blocks, 16 unguided shells S-5M or S-5K
    Bombs: one beam holder BDZ-57KU or BDZ-57KR with a bomb weighing up to 250 kg

    And if the enemy had few nurses and bombs, it was possible to add directly from the cabin smile

    Anyway, the plane was multi-purpose.
    An-2TD - airborne transport. The cabin is equipped for 12 paratroopers and their cargo, with benches along the sides and with devices for landing and dropping cargo. It was equipped with cables for carbines of parachute exhaust files, as well as sound and light alarms for commanding the paratroopers. [5]
    An-2F is an experimental artillery spotter with a glazed bulletproof glass cabin navigator in the rear of the fuselage, armor protection of the cockpit and armor protection of the engine, dorsal machine gun and two-wing vertical plumage (1948). Armament - two 20 mm caliber guns, luminous air bombs or photo air bombs. [5]
    An-2NAK - photo reconnaissance and night artillery reconnaissance. Two-keel with a glazed tail. Armed with a UBT machine gun or an NS-23 automatic gun. The first flight - in April 1949 (test pilot A.E. Pashkevich).
    An-2 "interceptor" - with a double machine gun turret behind the center section and a searchlight for intercepting reconnaissance balloons

    And you thought, "corncracker", this is unseen!
    And he is an interceptor!

    An-2- this is not for you, muhra .... smile
  • aiden 5 March 2020 20: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Gentlemen, experts (couch and professional) tell me whether there were in the USSR Armed Forces and whether in the RF Armed Forces there are analogues of the American ac-130 specter / U.
    1. Avior 5 March 2020 20: 55 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      In the USSR there was Tu2Sh with PPSh

      https://topwar.ru/11501-sistema-ppsh-ognennyy-ezh.html
      but it’s not quite that
      There was also the IL114TOP project, but this is already 1991, you yourself understand what time it is.

      https://topwar.ru/114126-aviacionnyy-kompleks-ognevoy-podderzhki-il-114-top.html
      Really didn’t
      hi
      1. aiden 5 March 2020 21: 09 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Thank you I just think in Syria such a plane would be useful to extinguish the barmaley. Nobody will get him there, but he will get everyone. Hours would fly over Idlib and fired. I like it here, and its purpose is quite interesting. It is clear that the enemy who has at least some sort of air defense and fighter aircraft will be shot down, but for conflicts like the Syrian, this is the plane that is needed.
        1. Avior 5 March 2020 21: 21 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Idlib is unlikely to
          Until the first MANPADS, and there they are, as I understand it.
        2. Lopatov 5 March 2020 23: 28 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: aiden
          but for conflicts like the Syrian, this is the plane that you need.

          1. aiden 6 March 2020 00: 22 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            According to statistics on the Internet, the cost of a Su-34 sortie is about 5 million rubles and includes everything from refueling to landing after dropping all the bombs
        3. Pavel57 6 March 2020 00: 49 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Il114TOP may still be back.
  • iouris 5 March 2020 21: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yes, there is a mode, but it’s not very clear why. All Soviet passenger aircraft had a bombing optical sight as part of their equipment. And the navigator.
  • Pavel57 5 March 2020 22: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    HEPHEST must be installed.
    1. iouris 5 March 2020 23: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It’s necessary for drones, but for BTA planes ... They "bomb" with loads on parachutes.
  • Klingon 6 March 2020 01: 33 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    IL-76 is a successful machine, you will not say anything. workhorse))
  • Klingon 6 March 2020 01: 35 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: aiden
    Thank you I just think in Syria such a plane would be useful to extinguish the barmaley. Nobody will get him there, but he will get everyone. Hours would fly over Idlib and fired. I like it here, and its purpose is quite interesting. It is clear that the enemy who has at least some sort of air defense and fighter aircraft will be shot down, but for conflicts like the Syrian, this is the plane that is needed.

    begs the idea with Ganship. only for these purposes for some reason they chose the prototype AN-12
    1. iouris 6 March 2020 13: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Klingon
      for this purpose, for some reason, they chose the prototype AN-12

      Engines do not know how to design and produce. Element base for equipment is not produced for the same reasons. An-12 is no longer possible to reanimate. There is "option B" - An-2.
  • ydjin 6 March 2020 03: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    A video of the bombing of military transport aircraft Il-76MD appeared on the Web
    Yesterday, 18: 30

    The title of the article is ambiguous, before dropping bombs and now dropping planes? laughing
    As I understand it, bombing was carried out from military transport aircraft IL-76MD!
  • aszzz888 6 March 2020 10: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Taki yes !!! You don’t often see SUCH !!! good
  • Klingon 7 March 2020 02: 42 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: iouris
    Quote: Klingon
    for this purpose, for some reason, they chose the prototype AN-12

    Engines do not know how to design and produce. Element base for equipment is not produced for the same reasons. An-12 is no longer possible to reanimate. There is "option B" - An-2.

    So I am aware of the AN-12. but the An-2 is also not an option. morally outdated. I think on the basis of the IL-112 it would be possible to blind something
  • Victor March 47 7 March 2020 15: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Rich
    Maz: And if six containers with ammunition of a volume explosion * are dropped from a ramp *? Is that a hint to the Turks?

    And if you reset it? smile We’ll induce fear. All human rights defenders will howl yes

    Well, if you pump up napalm, then it will be loud.
  • Narak-zempo 7 March 2020 18: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Cool, yeah. How many suspension points does it have? Reset 6 FAB-500 and fire at the target from the tail unit. During this time, it will be riddled with by everyone, including infantry weapons.