The network has a video refueling "White Swans" at a speed of 600 km / h

83
The network has a video refueling "White Swans" at a speed of 600 km / h

A video of the training of Russian strategic missile carriers Tu-160 White Swan appeared on the Web. The video was posted by the Russian Ministry of Defense on its YouTube channel.

On the website of the Russian military department, it is noted that the missile carriers spent more than eight hours in the air, practicing refueling at an altitude of more than five kilometers and at a speed of 600 km / h. Refueling was carried out from IL-78 tankers. It is noted that air refueling was complicated by bad weather conditions, in particular, a strong crosswind, and the aircraft were refueling at a distance of no more than 30 meters.



The Ministry of Defense explained that about ten aircraft of the Far aviation Russian Aerospace Forces taking off from airfields in different regions of Russia. Refueling was carried out in the daytime and at night.


Refueling in the air as one of the most difficult elements of flight training is a necessary element in the training of long-range pilots, which can significantly increase the combat radius of action and perform missions for the mission at a great distance from the base

- it is spoken in the message of military department.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    83 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +9
      3 March 2020 19: 50
      I like these birds.
      1. +4
        3 March 2020 20: 20
        Tu-154 passed through Turkey, coming to Syria.
        1. +6
          3 March 2020 20: 51
          Today, at around 16 p.m., the An-124 passed through Turkey in the Sinop area.
          1. 0
            3 March 2020 20: 55
            What to do rejoice?
            1. -6
              3 March 2020 22: 44
              Quote: Clever man
              What to do rejoice?

              laughing Probably to die of joywassat
            2. -1
              4 March 2020 11: 08
              The master is the master: he wants to live, he wants to hang himself. If you have a head, think for yourself. Do not ask others.
          2. +3
            3 March 2020 20: 57
            Yes that's right
    2. -12
      3 March 2020 19: 51
      cool!
      the question arises
      how many vks tankers?
      how many pilots of the Russian aerospace forces can complete this test?
      1. +3
        3 March 2020 20: 04
        Chatterbox, a godsend for ...)))
        1. -7
          3 March 2020 21: 16
          Everyone already knows: very little.
        2. -3
          3 March 2020 22: 46
          Quote: vfwfr
          Chatterbox, a godsend for ...)))

          For whom? In our age of very high technology.
          1. 0
            3 March 2020 23: 59
            Even in the "" age of very high technologies "" any of the ocean "well, stupid" figs will tell you such things
      2. +1
        3 March 2020 20: 05
        Why are you interested in? Whose intelligence are you working on?
        1. +1
          3 March 2020 21: 43
          Here
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Air_Force_installations
          complete List of United States Air Force installations with both longitude and latitude. And intelligence is not necessary.
        2. -7
          3 March 2020 22: 47
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          Why are you interested in? Whose intelligence are you working on?

          Purely neighing. laughing And what else can you come up with here?
          1. +2
            4 March 2020 00: 04
            Yes, and the truth. This is the army of the country in which you live.
            Indeed, how can you not neighing.
            1. +1
              4 March 2020 04: 44
              He is not local
      3. -4
        3 March 2020 20: 21
        Quote: KVK1
        cool!
        the question arises
        how many vks tankers?
        how many pilots of the Russian aerospace forces can complete this test?

        =========
        Your questions are strange. Partisan?
        1. +3
          3 March 2020 21: 14
          Quote: primaala
          Strange questions you have

          they are strange for someone who does not understand the role of air tankers. And the questions at KVK1 were purely rhetorical.
          Now almost all Russian Air Force planes have the ability to refuel in the air, but ... who will they refuel from? In service - only 15 (!!!) tankers. Is it not enough? This is catastrophically small. And how many combat pilots can competently carry out this very difficult operation, like refueling in the air?
          For example: in the Air Force and the US Navy, refueling in the air is a routine operation.
          1. +2
            3 March 2020 21: 26
            Even the Argentine pilots on the Super-Ethanders refueled several times in 1982 to slam the British with Exocet missiles at the ships. True, this did not save Argentina from defeat in the Falklands War.
          2. +2
            3 March 2020 21: 35
            Oh well, 15 ??? Firstly, a little more, and secondly, with the UPAZ container, you can refuel from the Su-24, but it must be assumed that the Su-34 have such an opportunity. And there is also a pair of IL-96, and the plans are even grander, even on the IL-112.
            1. +2
              3 March 2020 22: 00
              Quote: URAL72
              Oh well, 15 ???

              how much. The list number of tankers in the Russian Air Force is precisely this - 5 Il-78 and 10 Il-78M, how many of them are in flight-suitable condition is not known

              Quote: URAL72
              secondly, with the UPAZ container, you can refuel from the Su-24

              this does not solve the problem. Especially for long-range and strategic aviation

              Quote: URAL72
              and the plans are even grander

              oooh, we always have grandiose plans, but they don’t always consider it obligatory to execute them.
            2. 0
              4 March 2020 00: 09
              If desired, it is possible and from anything that flies faster than 350km per hour)). with impromptu alteration))
          3. -3
            3 March 2020 21: 37
            Quote: Gregory_45
            For example: in the Air Force and the US Navy, refueling in the air is a routine operation.

            Only from such a routine do they sometimes crash and fall.
            1. +4
              3 March 2020 22: 02
              so as not to have incidents - no need to fly at all. Better yet, do not have aviation at all.
              "If you do not have a home, he is not afraid of fires ..." (c)
              1. +4
                3 March 2020 22: 11
                Quote: Gregory_45
                so as not to have incidents - no need to fly at all.

                So this is not a routine, but a complex air operation.
          4. -4
            3 March 2020 21: 56
            It's useless to hang noodles on my ears. )))
          5. +1
            4 March 2020 00: 05
            Well, no one has built a transatlantic fighter yet .. And why do we need so much? To MiG-29, Su-33 \ 34, T-50 to Washington to fly ?? And those that can board, there is only 1 gas station and there will be a ticket to the 1st end .. That's the whole difference why we and they ... We do not forget that they live on a remote island.
    3. +3
      3 March 2020 19: 56
      Jewelry work
    4. +3
      3 March 2020 20: 09
      Quote: Sky Strike fighter
      Why are you interested in? Whose intelligence are you working on?

      why immediately "for exploration"
      (or do you have such a specialty? lol )
      just read in open sources
      -15 refueling tanks in the Russian Aerospace Forces (I don’t know about the number of serviceable ones, they don’t write)
      number of tankers in the enemy air force (one, without NATO) -520 (again, it is not known about serviceability)
      and I read somewhere that almost all pilots in the enemy’s air force have the skill of refueling and are constantly working on it ....
      it's true?
      1. +8
        3 March 2020 20: 15
        All combat pilots who fly an aircraft, implying the possibility of refueling in the air, have this skill.
        1. -3
          3 March 2020 21: 16
          Quote: Voyager
          All combat pilots who fly an aircraft, implying the possibility of refueling in the air, have this skill

          and how many refuelings do they carry out in a year? One, two, three? Do not tell, we are on this indicator in the most outsiders. And to everyone who is even a little bit in the subject, this is well known
          1. 0
            3 March 2020 21: 22
            I said that they own, not how much they perform. How often they perform you can calculate yourself. If there are any specific suggestions for improving these indicators, if you are in the subject, please: contact the MoD with this.
            1. -1
              3 March 2020 22: 04
              Quote: Voyager
              I said that they own, not how much they perform.

              in order to maintain the skill, you need to constantly train. This is an axiom, and it's silly to argue with her.
        2. +7
          3 March 2020 21: 27
          Well maybe, must own, so it will be more accurate.
    5. -1
      3 March 2020 20: 18
      Quote: Voyager
      All combat pilots who fly an aircraft, implying the possibility of refueling in the air, have this skill.

      well now i'm calm
      not only the enemy is training ....
      but why are there so many tankers for the enemy?
      do they have small tanks on planes?
      1. +3
        3 March 2020 20: 22
        Quote: KVK1
        but why are there so many tankers for the enemy?
        do they have small tanks on planes?

        laughing laughing laughing Is that humor?
        1. -5
          3 March 2020 20: 24
          Is that humor?

          why humor?
          I really don’t understand
          why the Russian aerospace forces enough 15 boards
          and the enemy needs 520
          35 times more ... recourse
          1. +2
            3 March 2020 20: 35
            Quote: KVK1
            why the Russian aerospace forces enough 15 boards
            and the enemy needs 520

            While you are flying to us on the continent, and even the brain needs to be twisted as it were, the Air Defense Forces are unscrewed, and We are used to flying on their civilian sides and then to wave
            1. -6
              3 March 2020 20: 37
              Until you reach us on the continent

              why should they fly across the ocean?
              they have bases in bulk
              don't they take off from these bases?
              or just burn the fuel?
              1. +3
                3 March 2020 20: 46
                Quote: KVK1
                why should they fly across the ocean?
                they have bases in bulk

                Decisive Yankees understand. They are afraid that they will receive fuel. Yes, and ears with eyes at us at each base laughing
            2. 0
              3 March 2020 21: 20
              Quote: Tusv
              Until you reach us on the continent

              yeah, fighters that patrol, for example, over the Baltic states - they flew straight from Edwards (California). Fly at our borders - and vice versa, through okian))
              1. +1
                3 March 2020 21: 22
                The topic of missile carriers and the B-52 does not stay long
          2. +2
            3 March 2020 20: 41
            And you count how many of your hosts have military bases in the world and what distance is between them. And we do not set ourselves the task of playing the role of a world hegemon, we are satisfied with multipolarity! tongue
            1. +2
              3 March 2020 20: 55
              You forgot to call me "Jew Bandera"
              in general, except for "your masters" there are no sane answers .....
              by the way, almost 60 years ago I was born in Samarkand in the family of a military pilot (my father served there, I also flew MIG 15), I never was in Ukraine (or .. I don’t know how to say it), I served in the Army (In Black Moscow Air Defense District) .. hi
              1. +1
                3 March 2020 21: 08
                Quote: KVK1
                in Ukraine (or .. I don’t know how to speak

                Ukrainian scientists have allowed and so and so. 10 years decided cranks))
              2. +1
                3 March 2020 21: 26
                In fact, you were told above - they have many military bases. Americans are used to operating far and wide from their continent, and this requires a powerful "base" in the form of supplies and other joys of life.
              3. +2
                3 March 2020 22: 39
                Quote: KVK1
                by the way, almost 60 years ago I was born in Samarkand in the family of a military pilot (my father served there, I also flew MIG 15), I never was in Ukraine (or .. I don’t know how to say it), I served in the Army (In Black Moscow Air Defense District) ..

                Even if this is true, then this fact does not completely cancel the presence of the owner now! We have many such examples, just look at the former fraternal republics! And judging by the posts, it’s 95 to 5 yes, there are few options — the former fraternal republics, the promised land or permanent residence / usa passport!
          3. +10
            3 March 2020 20: 43
            So it’s you who went to the wrong site. The country was a little mistaken. You need an American VO. And there, ask local US patriots - why do they need 520 tankers if the General Staff of the Russian Federation considers that 15 is enough for effective defense of such a huge country like Russia?
            am Or maybe they’re not thinking about the defense of their country at all am and (scary to think about it) what else? am Huh?
            1. +3
              3 March 2020 20: 48
              This your angry with a pitchfork looks like our abnormal Lyashka))
            2. +3
              3 March 2020 21: 27
              Quote: kit88
              The General Staff of the Russian Federation considers that 15 is enough for effective defense of such a huge country as Russia

              he (GS) does not think so. Where did you get this information?

              Not so long ago, the Air Force command wanted to receive several dozen new air tankers by 2025. However ... we have tankers, and the latest fighters, and ten aircraft carriers, and thirty-three destroyers.
              Plans remained plans.

              PS - if we have few tankers, this does not mean that they are enough.
              1. +8
                3 March 2020 21: 42
                Uh, brother, where did you go ....
                Of course, the general headquarters of any country would like to have 20 aircraft carriers and 1333 destroyers without damage to the economy. And what is there in the plans of the General Staff of the Russian Federation I do not know. Maybe in 2030 Mars plans to conquer, well, or more modestly - to project the force on which area is going - this requires "several dozen new air tankers."

                Is it enough now15?
                Looking for what.
                For me, the answer is simple.
                Milosevic was not enough.
                Saddam didn't have enough.
                Gaddafi was not enough.

                We have? So to speak. Sufficient minimum necessary to maintain independence.
                1. -7
                  3 March 2020 22: 12
                  20 aircraft carriers and 1333 destroyers without prejudice to the economy, of course, the general headquarters of any country would like to have available.

                  that's me gnawing questions
                  where does the money go?
                  one friend told me here -185 million a day without taking into account military operations in Syria
                  those. for "devour", toilet paper and pencils for the headquarters
                  Of course, they will do one SU57 per year ...
                  no money left....
                  1. +10
                    3 March 2020 22: 23
                    You know, for any complaint that there is not enough money, there is a killer answer:
                    - And you earn more.

                    I do not consider it necessary to take money from the Moscow Region. He needs 185 rubles, so give him two hundred and let him come again tomorrow for the money.
                    But where to get them / earn it - gentlemen, think economist and lawyers. Think well. So much so that not the last shirt to be torn off from the proletariat and not taxed with the 1001st tax of a small shopkeeper.
                    1. -2
                      3 March 2020 22: 26
                      You know, for any complaint that there is not enough money, there is a killer answer:
                      - And you earn more.

                      and you address these words to the one who said them ... to the prime minister
                      1. +8
                        3 March 2020 22: 35
                        Michal Vladimirovich?
                        Well yes. Uncle Misha sat for himself in his tax and did not blow a mustache. Suddenly, on you, a call from under the clouds:
                        - get ready ... no, not in Lefortovo ...
                        country
                        steer
                        you will. wassat
                        -- belay
                        Well, such an official version.
                        Or maybe something will come of Mikhail Vladimirovich.
                        But in general, he is a bonded person. Maneuver is limited - what scope will be defined in them and will float.
                  2. +2
                    3 March 2020 22: 35
                    Quote: KVK1
                    where does the money go?
                    one friend told me here -185 million a day without taking into account military operations in Syria

                    And here is the main theme of your questions, so to speak, "brought" the question in the right direction !! laughing I will disappoint you, it does not shine for you here. This issue has been discussed many times and put an end to. hi
              2. -2
                4 March 2020 06: 22
                Grigory_45, so the Americans also wanted to have hypersonic weapons and normal air defense and new strategic nuclear submarines to replace the decrepit 30-year-old Ohio and much more. And as a result, their crippled multibillion-dollar Patriots do not even shoot down the Houthis' old whistles in Saudi Arabia and Iranian rarities in Iraq, out of 11 aircraft carriers on the move only one half a year, Columbia will be the first to arrive at the best in 2031 (by which they can lose their nuclear potential) , replacement of 30-year-old SLBMs and 47-year-old "minutemans" is not even planned for 20 years, "hypersound" is only in Chinese plastic models. Do we remember Masyanya?)laughing. And after all, this is, with an endless printing press, trillions of $ plus a military budget higher in total than that of the rest of the planet, not horse feed.
          4. -2
            3 March 2020 20: 46
            I really don’t understand
            why the Russian Aerospace Forces are enough 15 boards and the enemy needs 520
            35 times more

            In the event of a full-fledged war, our losses will be less than that of the enemy. The statistics will be such that for every refueling tank we lost, there will be 35 enemy flying tankers ...
          5. 0
            3 March 2020 21: 42
            Quote: KVK1
            and the enemy needs 520
            35 times more ...

            Basically, they are doing this with the Navy, in case it is impossible to land on an aircraft carrier, refueling in the air is a vital skill when flying over the sea.
      2. +2
        3 March 2020 21: 43
        do they have small tanks on planes? .... NATO’s tanks are normal. But the engines are economical. the Arabian pipe calls in flight
      3. +3
        3 March 2020 22: 56
        Quote: KVK1
        but why are there so many tankers for the enemy? do they have small tanks on planes?

        To poke your nose around the world. And this is far from home.
    6. +1
      3 March 2020 20: 19
      I’ve read for a long time where I don’t remember: Echelon 6000, boom: 600 - the standard for refueling, since the wing scheme on the Tu16. If you make a mistake - correct ...
    7. 0
      3 March 2020 20: 44
      I wonder how many percent of the fuel is consumed by the takeoff of this "battleship"?
    8. 0
      3 March 2020 20: 55
      This video can be watched indefinitely, I admit I watched it several times, breathtaking, and great respect for the skill of the pilots.
      1. -8
        3 March 2020 21: 37
        To infinity, it’s impossible to watch. The following event options are possible:
        1. Delete this video.
        2. Your computer will crash.
        3. Your house will turn off the lights.
        4. The Internet will be interrupted.
        5. You will go to the toilet.
        6. Morpheus will overcome you.
        There are still many options, so with infinity you misled us ...
    9. +12
      3 March 2020 20: 56
      Graffiti on the house number 105 on the Gagarin street of Kazan. In this house lived Vasily Stalin.
    10. -6
      3 March 2020 21: 08
      Quote: kit88
      So it’s you who went to the wrong site. The country was a little mistaken. You need an American VO. And there, ask local US patriots - why do they need 520 tankers if the General Staff of the Russian Federation considers that 15 is enough for effective defense of such a huge country like Russia?
      am Or maybe they’re not thinking about the defense of their country at all am and (scary to think about it) what else? am Huh?

      why so
      I, as a citizen of Russia, are very worried about the state of our armed forces.
      and in particular the videoconferencing.
      cares why so few tankers we have
      and generally cares why there are so few planes
      why for the whole year they made only one SU57 (and he lost)
      why, instead of building 100 SU57 for the Russian VKS, you need to carry missiles and shells to Syria
      why should Assad be helped, what did he do good for Russia?
      do we have no Slavic peoples who need help? for example Serbia
      and another 100 "why and why"
      1. 0
        3 March 2020 21: 20
        Quote: KVK1
        I, as a citizen of Russia, are very worried about the state of our armed forces

        Do not worry. You voted and relax: in the Kremlin late at night the light in the window is on. This means that everything is under control.
        1. -6
          3 March 2020 21: 24
          You won’t believe it, but in my life I have never voted, neither in the 80s, nor in the 90s, nor in the 2000s
          in the 80s did not believe the communists
          in the 90s did not believe neo liberals
          in the 2000s no one believed anyone
          although I understand, your words are sarcasm
          1. 0
            3 March 2020 21: 51
            Quote: KVK1
            You won’t believe it, but I’ve never voted in my life

            Why, I believe you, is your constitutional right. But this does not change anything in your (and in my) life: everything is under control.
      2. +1
        3 March 2020 21: 32
        It remains to find out what has been done good for Russia recently by Slavic peoples, such as Serbia or Bulgaria, and in which they need help.
        1. -2
          3 March 2020 21: 42
          start with a story
          from the same Turkish wars where Russia and Bulgaria and Serbia fought shoulder to shoulder
          and with whom did you fight? yes with the same Turks (who were recently brothers in modern Russia)
          a common history, a common language (you know that the Serbian language is much closer to Russian than Ukrainian), a common religion (I do not want to understand the Alawites, Shiites and other varieties ... who is our "friend", and who is now "enemy", but yesterday there was a "friend")
          who is now in Europe the only country that supports Russia? while being surrounded by EU countries?
          and which country accepted refugees after the 1917 revolution? in Serbia, Montenegro there are Russian cemeteries, which are looked after by locals.
          what does Syria have to do with it? what does the dentist have to do with his dad? how did they come to power? why do they personally me? request
          1. -5
            3 March 2020 22: 04
            We must help Syria, because from time immemorial, from the Neolithic period in Hmeimim and Tartus our bases were located.
            This is our historical mission, so to speak, even there are Russian folk songs about it.

            Do you remember how it all began
            Adam and Eve met in Eden *,
            And in Hmeimim our base was in its infancy,
            It supplied us through Tartus.

            * communication, communication, relationships
      3. +1
        3 March 2020 21: 39
        Quote: KVK1
        why should Assad be helped, what did he do good for Russia?

        Yes, for now, nothing but 11 pennants in the Middle East on an ongoing basis
        1. -2
          3 March 2020 21: 45
          Yes, for now, nothing but 11 pennants in the Middle East on an ongoing basis

          to carry money back and forth (in the form of ammunition, weapons, etc.)
          You confuse cause and effect
        2. -2
          3 March 2020 21: 50
          in the Mediterranean on an ongoing basis

          but would not be cheaper to make a base in Serbia?
          without any war?
          almost in the center of Europe ...
          or would it be more difficult to write off money? without war? soldier
          1. -2
            3 March 2020 21: 56
            I immediately remembered "Prisoner of the Caucasus"
            [media = https: //ok.ru/video/59553810996]
          2. +3
            4 March 2020 01: 03
            but would not be cheaper to make a base in Serbia?
            without any war?
            almost in the center of Europe ...

            no sea
    11. +1
      3 March 2020 22: 24
      Enemies began to minus. They do not like to read the truth.
      (looked ... many instructed cons). Correct pans !!!
      1. -4
        3 March 2020 22: 58
        Today is Tuesday, is it really funfyriki with diphenhydramine went into action?
        1. +1
          3 March 2020 23: 28
          Quote: McDonnell Douglas
          Today is Tuesday, is it really funfyriki with diphenhydramine went into action?

          ==========
          Do not enter into confusion. Confess !!! Are you for the red, or for the white?
    12. +1
      4 March 2020 00: 43
      Sorry to address this topic ... I want to ask the administration of the VO site.
      What do "cons" mean? Why are they trying so hard? (I see the points on my personal page. Vary)
      Somehow, do they affect something?
      And yet, if it's not difficult, remove the wp. my comment, addressed with the content: "Do not confuse ... etc.
      (comment at the end of the tape).
      Thank you.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"