Americans demonstrated models of hypersonic weapons


On February 27, at the annual House Army Caucus Breakfast event, which was attended by representatives of the American Congress, mock-ups and other materials related to the promising hypersonic missile system were presented weapons ground based LRHW. Some of the mock-ups shown were made full-size.


The development of a new weapon is being carried out by Lokheed Martin with the participation of the US Army Office of Hypersonic Projects, Sandia National Laboratories, the United States Missile Defense Agency and several companies.

The new weapon is a universal medium-range ballistic solid-fuel missile. The missile is designed for ground-based and is equipped with a hypersonic guided maneuverable warhead C-HGB.



It is not known exactly what range the LRHW missile is designed for, but there is information that the range of the hypersonic warhead AHW, on the basis of which the C-HGB was supposedly developed, is 6800 kilometers. Based on this, some experts suggest that the range of the new weapons will be 3-4 thousand kilometers. It is also claimed that its speed will exceed 5M.
Photos used:
https://naked-science.ru/, Фейсбук/U.S.Army
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

91 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Zoldat_A 1 March 2020 19: 01 New
    • 49
    • 5
    +44
    How loudly, to the whole world, America screamed that the GDP of all "cartoons" about hypersonic weapons entertains. We agreed to the point that we stole from them all the secrets of hypersonic weapons.

    Well, who has cartoons?
    And yes. How can you steal something that is not yet?
    1. Andrey Mikhaylov 1 March 2020 19: 06 New
      • 10
      • 7
      +3
      Add .Nothing, great comment good
      1. Sky strike fighter 1 March 2020 19: 08 New
        • 8
        • 4
        +4
        The news will certainly please fans of animation. Yes, and with virtual reality, judging by the watching cartoon American military.
      2. venik 2 March 2020 17: 44 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Andrey Mikhaylov
        Add .Nothing, great comment good

        =========
        Something is not visible of the “leader of the redskins” who recently in an article about the tests of “Zircon” with “foam at the mouth” tried to prove that they were all “witches” and “cartoons” ..... It’s interesting that he would have "issued on the mountain" ???
      3. major147 3 March 2020 16: 21 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Andrey Mikhaylov
        Add .Nothing, great comment good

        I can add that the Americans are well done, they paint very beautifully .... tongue
    2. Victor_B 1 March 2020 19: 07 New
      • 33
      • 6
      +27
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      Well, who has cartoons?

      These are cartoons - who needs cartoons!
      Democratic. General human.
      And GDP has totalitarian ones, a threat to progressive humanity! laughing
    3. Aviator_ 1 March 2020 19: 33 New
      • 9
      • 4
      +5
      This is Walt Disney, this is not Soyuzmultfilm.
      1. Zoldat_A 1 March 2020 20: 00 New
        • 10
        • 3
        +7
        Quote: Aviator_
        This is Walt Disney, this is not Soyuzmultfilm.

        That's right ... (s)
        Soyuzmultfilm did not draw such a thing. He painted funny, kind, bright cartoons. With all due respect to Disney - Hollywood, still grow and grow to “Cheburashka” with “Carlson” ...
        1. Aviator_ 1 March 2020 20: 06 New
          • 4
          • 5
          -1
          Well, Disney has a classic (Snow White, Bambi, Old Pond, etc.) and the tiresomely moronic "Tom and Jerry"
          1. Zoldat_A 1 March 2020 20: 16 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            Quote: Aviator_
            Well, Disney has a classic (Snow White, Bambi, Old Pond, etc.)

            From me personally
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            With all due respect to Disney
          2. Voyager 2 March 2020 00: 38 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            Tom and Jerry are not related to Disney
      2. rich 2 March 2020 00: 51 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        This is Walt Disney, this is not Soyuzmultfilm.

        You're wrong.
        The Americans did not draw these cartoons. This is ours.
        In the 90s, Mr. O. Vidov brought them to the United States along with all our multclassics. And now the Americans pass them off as theirs. fool Pay attention to the logo on the screen. laughing
        1. Zoldat_A 2 March 2020 15: 43 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          good
          Quote: Rich
          In the 90s, Mr. O. Vidov brought them to the United States along with all our multclassics.

          With all due respect to the fact that O. Vidov created in the cinema - an ugly kind of act ... Although ... Not him, so different - according to the law, according to American.
          Priority licensing right - whoever got up first, that and slippers. As an actor, he had nothing to do in America, as did everyone who went there. And you need to live on something. Others did not guess, but Vidov thought of it.
    4. Zaurbek 1 March 2020 20: 15 New
      • 4
      • 4
      0
      They wrote on Military Parity that these are real mock-ups, not Putin’s cartoons.
    5. Grigory_45 1 March 2020 20: 43 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      The GDP of all "cartoons" about hypersonic weapons entertains.

      and GDP showed at least one cartoon about hypersonic missiles? Something did not notice. Zircon should be hypersonic, but the cartoon about it has not been shown (((

      American LRHW is not completely hypersonic. Apparently, the rocket starts vertically from the TPK, enters the stratosphere, flies along the ANN (possibly with astrocorrection) towards the target, and there the planning hypersonic unit is detached, which at a great speed and hits the target. The principle is like ballistic missiles. Does anyone call ballistic missiles hypersonic, although their warheads enter the atmosphere at wild speed?

      It seems that the very term hypersonic aircraft is so wiped out and distorted that now many simply don’t understand what GZLA is - and take everything for it that at least five seconds exceeds the speed of sound almost in outer space.
    6. Nick Russ 1 March 2020 20: 52 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      ,, And yes. How can you steal something that is not there yet ?,

      Well, that's because they stole it, so there’s not yet laughing

      Elon Musk is strange:
      https://youtu.be/sYeVnGL7fgw
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. Nikolay Ivanov_5 1 March 2020 21: 48 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      How loudly, to the whole world, America screamed that the GDP of all "cartoons" about hypersonic weapons entertains. We agreed to the point that we stole from them all the secrets of hypersonic weapons.

      Well, who has cartoons?
      And yes. How can you steal something that is not yet?


      And who else believes the Americans?
      1. Zoldat_A 1 March 2020 21: 54 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
        And who else believes the Americans?

        Poland, Ukraine, Tribaltica. The main allies ... laughing
        1. Nikolay Ivanov_5 1 March 2020 21: 59 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          The pan-skakuas will only be happy to participate in the crowd with Russophobes.
    9. Sarmat Sanych 1 March 2020 22: 40 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Soon, even the model will not be, plastic is also poured in China laughing laughing laughing
    10. The comment was deleted.
      1. Sarmat Sanych 1 March 2020 23: 22 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Exlan, oh here and the trolls of random trolls wentlaughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Sarmat Sanych 2 March 2020 00: 31 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Pan, tell you how hundreds of thousands of times underdeveloped mattresses swayed with geyropeysami in addition?)) Whose cow would have mooed, but not crap one's pants sect about "cartoons" and "There is no bridge"laughing. Trolltinka guys, you forgot where you went - it's VO and not Twitter with YouTube, people understand here. So you can be dishonored only because of the love of masochism.
    11. Chaldon48 2 March 2020 02: 36 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      You can steal everything if you are friends with aliens.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. Victor_B 1 March 2020 19: 29 New
      • 11
      • 7
      +4
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And there are no scramjet engines, which is typical ... Who has proved to me here that hypersound on a turbojet engine is off-screen, so to speak, "make-believe" ...
      Well, you’re just like collapsed from a sofa!
      This is Putin's Iskander, Daggers and Vanguards wrong hypersound!
      American hypersound - it's completely different! ..
      Creative, designer. It even smells of violets, not a totalitarian stink!
      1. figwam 1 March 2020 20: 01 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        But the striped-eared do not think so.

        Apparently the enemy’s missile defense, seeing a maneuvering unit suitable for hypersound, will have time to inform that this garbage is without a scramjet, so there is nothing to worry about. laughing
    2. Aviator_ 1 March 2020 19: 45 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Scramjet engines are needed for range. And on a solid propellant rocket engine you can only fly along a ballistic trajectory, well, perhaps, with the possibility of maneuvering in the final section.
      1. Mountain shooter 1 March 2020 19: 50 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Aviator_

        Scramjet engines are needed for range. And on a solid propellant rocket engine you can only fly along a ballistic trajectory, well, perhaps, with the possibility of maneuvering in the final section.

        Seriously? And how long can a turbojet engine work? What is so complicated, to make them work a little more. Or in two stages. When a rocket flies 3 km / s, the engine needs to work a little more than 1000 minutes at a range of 5 km. Shuttle solid fuel boosters worked for about as much.
        1. Victor_B 1 March 2020 20: 04 New
          • 0
          • 5
          -5
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          What is so complicated, to make them work a little more. Or in two stages. When a rocket flies 3 km / s, the engine needs to work a little more than 1000 minutes at a range of 5 km. Shuttle solid fuel boosters worked for about as much.
          I allow myself to object slightly to you.
          TTRD is certainly a wonderful thing, but inside it drags an oxidizing agent, thereby doubling the weight and size.
          Not to reach hypersound and strike a target is achievable and correct, but you always want to do it with maximum efficiency.
          (Making a smart face)
          The future is still for the scramjet!
          Vot!
          good
          1. KCA
            KCA 1 March 2020 20: 56 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            A turbojet engine does not carry an oxidizing agent with it, solid fuel also includes a combustible substance and an oxidizing agent, an increase in mass and volume yes, but for scramjet operation it is necessary to achieve a speed exceeding the speed of sound, most likely several times, respectively, another scramjet or rocket propellant is needed the engine, the more powerful and with a large fuel supply, if the start is ground
            1. Grigory_45 1 March 2020 21: 00 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: KCA
              scramjet needs another jet or rocket engine

              or resettable solid fuel accelerator.
              Do not look for easy ways?
    3. Grigory_45 1 March 2020 20: 47 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      hypersound on turbojet engine - it’s not good

      This was proved by Russian academics and designers involved in the GZLA. A solid-fuel engine will not provide a stable long-term hypersonic flight. In the current realities, it is either a liquid engine or a scramjet.
      For the American apparatus - see my comment above. A medium-range solid-fuel ballistic missile throws a warhead into the stratosphere, from where it plans for the target, gaining hypersonic speed
      1. KCA
        KCA 1 March 2020 21: 16 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Ramjet ramps have been developed since the 50s, however, something still does not grow together, only experimental samples, all
        1. Grigory_45 1 March 2020 21: 29 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: KCA
          Ramjet ramps have been developed since the 50s, however, something still does not grow together, only experimental samples, all

          there are no special problems with ramjet. Many modern missiles fly on it - for example, the P-800 Onyx, P-270 Mosquito, X-31, etc.

          With the scramjet - a different story. There really are difficulties here that no one has been able to overcome effectively so far.
          1. KCA
            KCA 2 March 2020 05: 46 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            The ramjet ramjet, nevertheless, has a relatively short operating time, about 15 minutes for Onyx, and a small mass of the rocket after separation of the accelerator, but it doesn’t smell serial ramjet engines
            1. Grigory_45 2 March 2020 06: 27 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: KCA
              The ramjet ramp, however, has a relatively short operating time

              it has nothing to do with it. The ramjet can run for as long as you want until the fuel runs out.
              Why not on airplanes, but caught on on rockets? The answer, in principle, is to start the ramjet, you need an initial relatively high speed (at least more than 0,5M). In the case of a rocket, this is solved simply - a starting accelerator. And the case with the plane is more complicated. He needs either a cunning engine, or an accelerating turbojet engine. And to drag two motors (or have a complex and moody, like on a Black Bird) is not very profitable.
              Perhaps the only ramjet implemented on a serial machine is the American SR-71 and their Lockheed D-21B UAVs. You can still recall the French experienced Leduc.
              1. Crimean partisan 1974 2 March 2020 14: 53 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Perhaps the only ramjet implemented on a serial machine is on the American SR-71 ...... well, wax on a board is not direct-flow engines, but injection ones. this is a slightly different and complex design. but no matter how the ramjet in its pure form like that of Mosquito, a similar injection power plant was used back in the 60s by the same Americans in the concept of VTOL. but merged in favor of the VTOL Harrier, I don’t remember what the project was called. but nevertheless it’s from there at Byrd the elements of the power plant
                1. Grigory_45 2 March 2020 17: 18 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                  but no matter how pure ramjet

                  At high speeds, the Drozda motors operate as ramjet ramjets - a direct-flow circuit provides more than 80% of thrust
                  1. Crimean partisan 1974 2 March 2020 20: 57 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Well, to you, the load ..... if it is ramjet, then I'm not the Crimean partisan
                    1. Grigory_45 2 March 2020 21: 17 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      see the bottom figure - and compare with the ramjet diagram))

                      The Drozda motor is, in fact, a hybrid of a turbojet engine and a ramjet. At subsonic and low supersonic speeds, it works like a conventional turbojet with afterburner. At high speeds, the air flow is redirected from the inlet to the fuel afterburning chamber - thereby the compressor, the combustion chamber and the turbine are actually enveloped by the air flow, and the engine starts to operate in the once-through mode
                      1. Crimean partisan 1974 3 March 2020 06: 38 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        from the input apparatus to the fuel burn-in chamber ..... this is called injection, that is, the power plant gets the working fluid in the combustion chamber bypassing the turbine, a similar circuit was tested in American VTOL projects. as I explained above,
  3. Well done 1 March 2020 19: 09 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Could and draw more beautiful. But neither Hollywood likes to fantasize.
    1. Zoldat_A 1 March 2020 19: 14 New
      • 4
      • 5
      -1
      Quote: Welldone
      Could and draw more beautiful. But neither Hollywood likes to fantasize.

      For Hollywood, drawing a hypersound is a trifle. "A small step for a man, but a huge step - for the whole of humanity" they managed to draw, and here ...
      1. Reserve officer 1 March 2020 19: 59 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Disney Hollywood to the rescue. Terrible power will be.
  4. Vlad5307 1 March 2020 19: 10 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    As you can see, FSA developments of the USSR stolen in the 90s did not really help. They decided early that Russia would be finished once and for all. wassat
  5. Petrol cutter 1 March 2020 19: 15 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    A lot of years can pass from the demonstration of materials and models to finished / workable products. Even under US conditions however. hi
    1. Nikolay87 1 March 2020 19: 24 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      But as they put into service, they rivet in disproportionate numbers, which can only be envied. Money in striped in bulk

      We should recourse
      1. Petrol cutter 1 March 2020 19: 46 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Here, yes. Do not pour sugar on my salt.
        About such workshops I can only nervously smoke, dream on the sidelines.
        Ours are also trying to work in this direction, but I personally have a categorically huge question. What the hell is AWAY BAD LIGHTING in the shops ?! Actually, nothing is visible to the working people.
        Compare the lighting in the photo and the lighting in the modernized third workshop of our factory. For the first, I do not speak at all.
  6. Egor53 1 March 2020 19: 20 New
    • 13
    • 6
    +7
    "It is also claimed that its speed will exceed 5M."
    American experts have always admired me with utter dullness.
    To declare that the speed of hypersonic weapons should exceed 5M is the same as declaring that 2x2 = 4.
    What do you want from a country where the literacy rate is OFFICIALLY only 86%, as in Jamaica, it is 113th in the world.
    The USA is a country of illiterate, but very rich, degenerates. I lived there for 1,5 years, I know what I'm talking about.
    1. businessv 1 March 2020 19: 33 New
      • 7
      • 5
      +2
      Quote: Egor53
      The USA is a country of illiterate, but very rich, degenerates. I lived there for 1,5 years, I know what I'm talking about.

      Egor, your post is like a balm for the soul! They brought me back to real life, in which I constantly affirm this, but my interlocutors, most often, are struggling to refute this! Thanks! good drinks
    2. ugol2 1 March 2020 19: 40 New
      • 12
      • 8
      +4
      The USA is a country of illiterate, but very rich, degenerates.

      All this is a plus.
      Can someone explain how a whole country of stupid and illiterate people can be at the same time "very rich"
      One excludes the other. what
      Not?
      1. Fishery 1 March 2020 19: 50 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Yeah, they can tryndet on the American Internet)
      2. Lopatov 1 March 2020 19: 52 New
        • 5
        • 8
        -3
        Quote: ugol2
        Can someone explain how a whole country of stupid and illiterate people can be at the same time "very rich"

        Easy .... You have to be the dumb son of rich parents ...

        Do you even understand the meaning of the post?
        Or did you stand on an insult to the Luminary?
        1. ugol2 1 March 2020 20: 11 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          - Moysha, today I gave a blunder at the market.
          - So. Who is this Mach, who works, and what will we have from this?

          So from all this, I have two questions:
          - Who is this Svetoch?
          - Where to get 100 million rich parents?
        2. for
          for 1 March 2020 23: 42 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Spade
          You have to be the dumb son of rich parents.

          And rich parents from Russia, of course.
      3. bar
        bar 1 March 2020 20: 11 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Can someone explain how a whole country of stupid and illiterate people can be at the same time "very rich"
        One excludes the other. what
        Not?

        Not. To be rich, and at the same time stupid, it is enough for other stupid people to instruct you to print money for them.
        1. Crimean partisan 1974 2 March 2020 15: 06 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          To be rich, and at the same time stupid, it is enough for other stupid people to instruct you to print money for them ........ and also treat them with democratic cookies
      4. Zoldat_A 1 March 2020 20: 36 New
        • 5
        • 4
        +1
        Quote: ugol2
        The USA is a country of illiterate, but very rich, degenerates.

        All this is a plus.
        Can someone explain how a whole country of stupid and illiterate people can be at the same time "very rich"
        One excludes the other. what
        Not?

        One does not depend on the other.
        There are literate, smart people - but the poor.
        And there are a huge number of stupid, illiterate, but cunning, unprincipled and dodgy hucksters - and therefore rich.

        I personally knew in the late 90s in Moscow there was one old grandfather, the professor-philologist, who had raised candidates of philological sciences more than I had masons working at construction sites. He lived in a studio apartment among books. There is NOTHING in the apartment except a broken TV. With my mother, I visited him once — my mother wanted to make soup for him. And he has one and only pan with a hole. I went to the nearest store, bought him a set of stainless steel pots. He started cooking - cockroaches walk on foot. I called the service, processed. I bought him a TV and a radio. I paid a cleaning company for the year to bring order to twice a month. This is the least that I could do for him for what he scientifically did for my mother. And for this he almost "persecuted" persuaded.
        Here is an example - smart but poor.
        Well, you dumb, illiterate rich hucksters, probably without examples in your life, you have enough - they are all around.
        1. ugol2 1 March 2020 21: 18 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          One does not depend on the other.

          This is not normal! When not dependent. When the "professor" has a holey pan!
          It does not depend if you live in an abnormal state. By type of RF of the 90s. When the presence of an academic mind and higher education, which was not realized in commerce or direct criminal offense, really guaranteed the interruption from bread to vodka, no more.

          Maybe the population is smart, but the country is poor? Can. Example? Better not to voice.
          Maybe the population is "stupid, without a needless, all (EVERYTHING!) Degenerates", and the country is the richest in the world? They say that this is the USA ..
          Something does not stick with such logic.
          1. ApJlekuHo 3 March 2020 00: 45 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            They explained to you, there are 2 types of smart people. Creative creators and stupid cunning, some create, and the second they hammer in this loot. And there is nothing contradictory, neither for those nor for others, there are no things in this state. The former is interested in the material world in the form of scientific progress and, to some extent, to improve household “crutches,” while the latter applies everything that has been created to our primitive existence. As a housewife arranging furniture, having no idea where this furniture comes from. The most creative thing she came up with was the patent office, after which any new “furniture”, through cunning manipulations, miraculously became kosher. As for the United States, I hope it’s not necessary to remind that this is not a country, but the United States on the northern mainland of America (essentially a copy of the USSR), which were created relatively recently, from European immigrants. Simply put, a colony of emigrants, without nationality and state language. This colony was created artificially, as the main tool for imposing a democratic line in the world, with the goal of building a global world order. And as an example to everyone else, huge resources were shamelessly poured into it for 200 years, while simultaneously holding the population at the level of plankton and building up its muscles, like a pit bull. And the result was a convincing well-fed pit bull biting off a piece of flesh from anyone who does not understand all the charms of liberalism and democracy. Not degenerates, but rather opportunists and certainly not the richest in the world ..
      5. carstorm 11 1 March 2020 22: 01 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        you see ... educated does not mean smart. educated people may well be stupid and rich at the same time.
  7. K-50 1 March 2020 19: 29 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    On February 27, at the annual House Army Caucus Breakfast event, which was attended by representatives of the American Congress, mock-ups and other materials were presented on the promising LRHW ground-based hypersonic missile system. Some of the mock-ups shown were made full-size.

    While pin dosniks are demonstrating mock-ups to members of Congress, thus apparently showing where the money has gone, our Armed Forces get real Weapons. fellow lol
  8. Aleks2000 1 March 2020 19: 30 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    It is finished!
    Predicted 2 years ago, the cartoon race has begun!

    What will our answer ???
  9. faterdom 1 March 2020 19: 31 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    "World Disney Production." So win!
  10. Ham
    Ham 1 March 2020 19: 34 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    Oh, we are afraid ... Katz is trying to prove to everyone that he is the coolest cowboy ...
  11. rocket757 1 March 2020 19: 47 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    What, what, and know how to demonstrate minke whales!
    "Factory of dreams" for the military and politicians, works without stopping!
    However, they will create, whatever it may be, since there really are about them!
    The country is rich, all they need is ......
    Of course they banned, were too lazy .... forced circumcision of Wishlist, intensive "bloodletting" for the most greedy, the situation can be corrected to the necessary intensification of the brain.
    1. alipes 1 March 2020 20: 35 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      It seems that the examiner wrote. Russian language is resting.
      1. rocket757 1 March 2020 22: 05 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The Internet is lousy, and the program adds / corrects a distorted test as it pleases. Not USEshniki, those who write on a mobile phone have long known this.
  12. Lena Petrova 1 March 2020 19: 50 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Zoldat_A
    And yes. How can you steal something that is not yet?

    Just as interfering in future elections.
  13. Andrei from Chelyabinsk 1 March 2020 19: 51 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    What can I say? A bad example is contagious. Now here is the USA giving out an ordinary medium-range ballistic missile for hypersonic weapons :)))
  14. Lena Petrova 1 March 2020 19: 51 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Alex2000
    Predicted 2 years ago, the cartoon race has begun!

    What will our answer ???

    Soyuzmulfilm vs. Disney?
    1. Zagadka 1 March 2020 22: 02 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      I do not think Soyuzmultfilm is still at the highest level!))
  15. gridasov 1 March 2020 20: 00 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Lovers of irony are more than enough. however, work on the creation of detonation engines continues and the University of Washington is positioning a new such VDD. It is argued that a mathematical model of such a process has been built. And then they are cunning! Since the process model does not give a result and the mathematical principles themselves are inferior to describe the entire rational sequence of process steps and obtaining the result itself. In general, people work!
    1. bar
      bar 1 March 2020 20: 09 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And this is good. People at work, they work, they get salaries, they cut the budget to the joy of family and friends.
      1. gridasov 1 March 2020 20: 18 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Everyone understands that progress is both a necessity and a reality. Not everyone understands that those who will possess the perfect technology will for a very long time possess superiority both in intellectual and technological and military. They realize even less that only advanced mathematical methods will allow a deeper analysis of such newly reproduced physical processes and the devices themselves.
        1. bar
          bar 1 March 2020 20: 22 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          All this is so. But striped methods have more and more mathematical methods, and less and less advanced technologies. Damned digitalization, her mother ... She will not bring them to good.
          1. gridasov 1 March 2020 20: 27 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Nevertheless, both in the States and in Russia there are groups of scientists working on variable methods of analysis of highly potential and highly dynamic physical processes, rather than computational ones.
            1. bar
              bar 1 March 2020 20: 33 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Yes, I do not mind, let them work. Moreover, from the analyzes of these scientists to working iron, the road for stripes is getting longer and longer. Have they transferred the import substitution of our RD-180 for what year?
            2. Crimean partisan 1974 2 March 2020 15: 19 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              both in the States and in Russia there are groups of scientists working on variable methods of analysis of highly potential and highly dynamic .... cheers, I know those, these are Chubais. Well, rather, not quite Chubais A nanists !!!!!!
  16. Voltsky 1 March 2020 20: 04 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Aviator_
    Scramjet engines are needed for range. And on a solid propellant rocket engine you can only fly along a ballistic trajectory, well, perhaps, with the possibility of maneuvering in the final section.

    But this is a test statement, justify :)
    There are a number of differences between the turbojet engine and the gas turbojet engine ... and not one of them applies to the flight of the crazy idea that you wrote :)
  17. bar
    bar 1 March 2020 20: 06 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Layouts are great. Sorry, striped parades are not held. Could these models in the parades carry laughing
  18. Voltsky 1 March 2020 20: 14 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Egor53

    The USA is a country of illiterate, but very rich, degenerates. I lived there for 1,5 years, I know what I'm talking about.

    Firstly, not all, secondly, you were clearly in a specific environment simply.
    It’s just that I don’t allow myself to say this, although I remember a couple of pearls that the Americans sometimes threw out my colleagues, because in Russia, considering the posts which people here leave sometimes, there may also be an unjustified opinion, including about you.
    1. gridasov 1 March 2020 20: 22 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      I also believe that it is inappropriate to generalize and put everyone on the same intellectual level.
      1. Voltsky 2 March 2020 00: 20 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Yes, this is one of the signs of Nazism ... otherwise, if you don’t know the story, then the generalization is “Der Ewige Jude” and “Generalplan Ost”.
        And if you like this, then your ancestors probably weren’t in the furnace for nothing, then such questions would not have come.
        1. gridasov 2 March 2020 10: 41 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          If you build a structure of basic principles on which the ideology of Nazism, Bolshevism, communism, anarchy is based. It’s not difficult to notice the main thing is the manipulation of the same tools based on a person’s presentation of a happy life. Moreover, everyone builds their happiness on the enslavement of others. Therefore, what is bad in the ideology of Nazism when the priority is given to the development of one national community itself. At the same time, I did not at all accept such a development in the exploitation and enslavement of others. In all these ideologies there is no reasonable mathematical sequence excluding confrontation and tension with the interests of others. All ideologies are a formal call for confrontation and confrontation. A person is stupid and does not change the fundamental foundations of his knowledge of development. Only names and slogans change. The game of cubes continues.
          1. Voltsky 2 March 2020 20: 10 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            In the course that this heresy could be 4 times at least write shorter?
            Nationalism is moving towards the search for enemies, external and internal; and this has a beginning but not this end.
            ps here bust
            reasonable mathematical sequences;
            clever words not in cash, something like that was possible only in the works of Azimov.
  19. Ros 56 1 March 2020 20: 33 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Models are good, only one trouble, models do not fly, from the word at all. They can be shown to infinity, but at least kill, they will not fly. Well, the stripes lagged behind the Russians, so admit and sniff further into two holes.
  20. Chingachguk 1 March 2020 20: 37 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    The Americans had to ask my son to draw the latest rocket !!!! And he would also be able to comment on what he drew !!!! 7 years old, and a dime a dozen fancy !!!! And free balabolit !!!!!
  21. Imperial Technocrat 1 March 2020 21: 26 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    If it is a ballistic missile, and not aeroballistic, then this is not hypersonic
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. aszzz888 2 March 2020 01: 36 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    were introduced layouts and other materials regarding the prospective LRHW ground-based hypersonic missile weapon system
    Well, Hollywood was always on top. And landed on the moon, and much more ... laughing
  24. Mavrikiy 2 March 2020 08: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Americans demonstrated models of hypersonic weapons
    It's good. But even for layouts, virtual reality glasses are required. request 1 photo. No points, no rockets. Tomorrow it will take points to see America. fellow
  25. Razvedka_Boem 2 March 2020 18: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How bombed the opponents of the "cartoons" ..)
    But when they are shown in the USA .. That’s normal - secret, etc.)))