US will provide non-combat support to Turkey in Idlib province


Assistance from the United States to Turkey will not be related to the military operations of the US units, as the US ally will be provided with "various information" and equipment by Turkey. This was reported by a senior representative of the US State Department.


According to the American official, the United States has not yet decided to send military units to Syrian Idlib, but Turkey’s assistance as a US ally in NATO will not be related to military support.

Earlier, the head of the State Department, Mike Pompeo, said that the United States is considering options for assisting Turkey, as "they are trying to prevent the further manifestation of cruelty by the Bashar al-Assad regime and Russia, as well as alleviate the humanitarian suffering in Idlib."

Pompeo accused Damascus and Moscow of “preventing the establishment of a ceasefire,” Washington believes that Moscow and Damascus are closely coordinating the issue of strategic, air and missile attacks in Idlib, and the Syrian army “acts only with the permission of the Russian military.”

Earlier, US Ambassador to NATO Kay Bailey Hutchinson said that the United States will provide assistance to Turkey. According to her, "all options are being considered."

Meanwhile, it became known that the Pentagon opposed the deployment of the American Patriot air defense systems on the southern border of Turkey to establish a no-fly zone over Idlib.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

153 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladyka Ecumenical 29 February 2020 14: 49 New
    • 4
    • 8
    -4
    An interesting movie is waiting for us gentlemen.
    1. Sky strike fighter 29 February 2020 14: 54 New
      • 8
      • 14
      -6
      US will provide non-combat support to Turkey in Idlib province

      Moral support? They’ll buy the flags of Turkey and will support them like they do in football. Yes. The NATO bloc is threatening. You won’t say anything. wink
      1. exo
        exo 29 February 2020 15: 00 New
        • 35
        • 2
        +33
        Intelligence support, including from a satellite constellation. This is a rather serious step. And I think, not the only one.
        The game went big.
        1. Perhaps on the approach video of white helmets with chemical attacks. Blows with axes.
          It seems that Erdogan will talk every day about the thousands of killed Syrians and equipment in order to save face. Then the meeting of the tops and the divorce of the parties in the corners. IMHO.
          1. maidan.izrailovich 29 February 2020 15: 29 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            Perhaps on the approach video of white helmets with chemical attacks. Blows with axes.

            Erdogan in his last speech just mentioned the Syrian "chemical warehouses." It seems not for nothing that he and Trump were talking on the phone. Apparently coordinated their actions.
            It is incomprehensible only the silence of Iran against this background.
            1. It is incomprehensible only the silence of Iran against this background.

              In Iran, the coronavirus is raging there. Maybe he don’t care about Idlib. There he thinks more about how to annoy Israel.
            2. Ovrag 29 February 2020 16: 05 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              But Iran has nothing to share with the Turks at the moment. Rather, even the opposite. The Kursk problem, albeit far and not on such a scale, exists in Iran. And they are also not interested in strengthening a number of factions in Syria. And Russia, for them, is both an ally and a rival, since the Iranians also want to be able to restore order in Syria. Therefore, it is logical for them to wait and see what Russia and Turkey will do there. And then agree with the winners and losers. The same "east is a delicate matter." Here today is an ally, tomorrow is an enemy.
              1. Lelek 29 February 2020 23: 49 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Ovrag
                The same "east is a delicate matter." Here today is an ally, tomorrow is an enemy.

                hi
                Your truth. And the main principle is to "get your" opponent "into the minefield, and then he will cope" (Surkov). yes
                1. hydrox 1 March 2020 09: 48 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Lelek
                  "get his" opponent "in the minefield, and then he will cope" (Surkov).

                  If Surkov actually said these words, then the GDP completely released him in vain.
            3. TatarinSSSR 29 February 2020 16: 33 New
              • 5
              • 2
              +3
              Iranian Foreign Ministry: the state is closely monitoring developments in Idlib
              TEHRAN, February 29, 2020, 07:51 - REGNUM On February 28, the Foreign Ministry of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) reacted to the escalation of the conflict in the northwestern Syrian province of Idlib, saying that the country was ready to take all measures to help reduce tension. This was reported by the Iranian agency Mehr News.

              "We are closely following the development of events in the country, special attention is paid to Idlib, and we will continue to take various efforts to put an end to the current tension," the Iranian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.



              Details: https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2871193.html
              Any use of materials is allowed only if there is a hyperlink to REGNUM.
              1. Ovrag 1 March 2020 00: 23 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                The weakening of Russia's position in Syria, automatically strengthens the position of Iran. And in the end, in any case, "only one should remain." So they are closely watching. Concerned.
            4. Altai72 29 February 2020 17: 25 New
              • 3
              • 6
              -3
              Iran licks the wounds. Yesterday, he lost 16 ichtamnets in one hit, and about 300 in a week laughing
        2. lopvlad 29 February 2020 15: 58 New
          • 1
          • 6
          -5
          Quote: exo
          Intelligence support, including from a satellite constellation.


          you naively think that a country in NATO did not have access to intelligence and satellite alliance groups.
          This is another message for Erdogan in the style of "Our hearts are with you, dear Erdogan, and you fight somehow yourself" or, more precisely, duplicated the message that was after the downing of SU-24.
        3. Uncle Izya 29 February 2020 17: 52 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          This is not a game. The main thing is that they do not block the straits for Russian ships.
        4. smart ass 29 February 2020 18: 15 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          No one doubted that the mattresses would fit
        5. Zaurbek 29 February 2020 19: 57 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          There are a lot of NATO radars in the region, Avaxs fly, satellites.
      2. Stas-90 29 February 2020 15: 54 New
        • 6
        • 12
        -6
        The Turks will take Idlib for themselves. They will find chemical weapons. They will crush Assad.
        You think the opinion of the Russian Federation will be reckoned with. RF what can they do? Only unleash the Third World War, but Putin is unlikely to do this.
      3. knn54 29 February 2020 15: 55 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        US gave Turkey GOOD to outrage.
      4. lopvlad 29 February 2020 16: 01 New
        • 9
        • 10
        -1
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Yes, the NATO bloc is threatening


        NATO is threatening when you can bombard the Papuans on carts from afar, and when you can row in full, then he is in thought.
      5. gohomeyanki 29 February 2020 16: 04 New
        • 4
        • 4
        0
        Nuuu, a favorite tactic of the West, will say that Turkey is not just bombing Syria, and not because Turkish troops fall under shelling, which should not be in Syria, but because there are chemical weapons.
        Well, the western man in the street is dumb, but he understands that if Assad shoots at Syria, and then suddenly the Turkish troops, something is wrong)

        In total, information support will be provided from the West. The BBC has already talked about how Turkey bombed a chemical warehouse. weapons, we are waiting for the rest of the media.
      6. alexmach 29 February 2020 16: 59 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Moral support? They’ll buy the flags of Turkey and will support them like they do in football. Yes. The NATO bloc is threatening. You won’t say anything. wink

        Yeah .. or they will lift AWACS from all their bases nearby and in 24x7 they will cover the air situation in all of Syria .. as was the case when the SU-24 was shot down.
    2. Azazelo 29 February 2020 15: 08 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      Well, yes, we live in an era of change ...
      1. ltc35 29 February 2020 15: 37 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Wars and conflicts stop, then the USA runs out of money.
        1. Zoldat_A 29 February 2020 16: 03 New
          • 7
          • 3
          +4
          Quote: ltc35
          Wars and conflicts stop, then the USA runs out of money.

          On the contrary, when the USA runs out of money, wars and conflicts will stop in the world.

          Only they will not run out of money - they make them. With the cost of printing a 100-dollar note at 2 cents (a profit of 500000% !!!) - America will fight to the last European or Arab or Chinese for such a profit.
    3. Askold Matveev 29 February 2020 15: 42 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Quote: Vladyka Ecumenical
      An interesting movie is waiting for us gentlemen.

      I don’t think so. Russia will agree with Turkey and Turkey will receive its "zone of influence" in Syria. Assad will remain in power. In Syria, the war on terrorism will continue for several more years.
    4. Op po 29 February 2020 16: 59 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      In 3D, there is no desire to watch this movie? Live, so to speak .. But you have to .. When trench water for the very eggs .. Winters are now a little warmer ..
  2. KVK1 29 February 2020 14: 50 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Lend-Lease 2?
    The USA will provide Turkey with "various information" and equipment.
    1. Sky strike fighter 29 February 2020 14: 55 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      Friend help for "friend Recep".
    2. Zoldat_A 29 February 2020 16: 04 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: KVK1
      Lend-Lease 2?
      The USA will provide Turkey with "various information" and equipment.

      And Second Front 2?
  3. slavaseven 29 February 2020 14: 51 New
    • 6
    • 6
    0
    Something I'm worried about. I am worried if our Defense Ministry will surrender the back in defending Syria. It's time to show the eggs
    1. Sky strike fighter 29 February 2020 14: 57 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      So I still think that Assad would not be removed. For so many years, these imperialists have not been able to fall off. Do not expel in any way. Is honey smeared with them there?
      1. Rostislav 29 February 2020 15: 14 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        Oil and gas.
    2. Rusik.S 29 February 2020 14: 58 New
      • 3
      • 11
      -8
      It will not be easy, given the love of our politicians for money
    3. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 15: 05 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      but what's the point? the offensive began for a reason. one could not twitch and everything would be calm. and we went on an aggravation. then they knew why and for what.
      1. New Year day 29 February 2020 15: 17 New
        • 15
        • 4
        +11
        Quote: carstorm 11
        and we went on an aggravation. then they knew why and for what.

        just our actions to eliminate such exacerbations, yesterday’s meeting of the Security Council of the Russian Federation to this confirmation:
        “Serious concern was expressed about the escalation of tension in Idlib, which caused numerous casualties, including among Turkish troops” (Kremlin press service)
        According to the reaction that NATO, the USA, France and Germany demonstrate, Turkey’s actions did not come as a surprise to them.
        1. lopvlad 29 February 2020 16: 05 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: Silvestr
          Yesterday’s meeting of the Security Council of the Russian Federation


          In recent years, Putin has been collecting the Security Council of the Russian Federation for any reason, for diarrhea and lapping. Not an indicator, but an ordinary routine.
          1. New Year day 29 February 2020 18: 26 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: lopvlad
            collects the Security Council of the Russian Federation for any reason, for diarrhea and loudness. Not an indicator, but a regular routine

            at least read the newspapers? laughing
            "Escalation in Idlib: Putin gathered the Security Council "
            Putin holds Idlib Security Council operational meeting

            28.02.2020, 17: 11
            https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2020/02/28/12981355.shtml
            1. lopvlad 2 March 2020 20: 23 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Silvestr
              at least read the newspapers?


              so pride bursts from the fact that the letters have mastered that the keyboard is stuck ?. Count how many times a year Putin holds an operational meeting of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, maybe then it starts to reach. Naturally, the Security Council mentions current issues on current events.
        2. Zoldat_A 29 February 2020 16: 07 New
          • 12
          • 1
          +11
          Quote: Silvestr
          Serious concern expressed

          Again, damn it, "expressed concern"! ... Act when something will begin?

          Tired of it. Picked up the "preoccupied" ...
          1. Salty 29 February 2020 16: 32 New
            • 6
            • 3
            +3
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Quote: Silvestr
            Serious concern expressed

            Again, damn it, "expressed concern"! ... Act when something will begin?

            You are trolling, and you are being fooled ...
            1. Zoldat_A 29 February 2020 16: 38 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: SaltY
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              Quote: Silvestr
              Serious concern expressed

              Again, damn it, "expressed concern"! ... Act when something will begin?

              You are trolling, and you are being fooled ...

              Well, if the Security Council of the Russian Federation trolls the whole world, then I don’t know where the world is heading ...
              1. Salty 29 February 2020 16: 43 New
                • 8
                • 2
                +6
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                SB RF the whole world is trolling

                An interesting point of view, but I didn’t talk about that a bit.

                Quote: Zoldat_A
                I don’t know where the world is heading ...

                Yes, it seems so far so good with the world. And the fact that not even Turkey with Russia, but Russia with the United States is butting in Syria is so obvious that even talking about it is inconvenient. Such a normal fight under the carpet, on the other side of the proxy, and on our side is also a proxy ... new style war, welcome to the 21st century. And the staff members famously spread the sultan, I wonder what will happen next.
                1. Zoldat_A 29 February 2020 17: 18 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  Quote: SaltY
                  And the staff members famously spread the sultan, I wonder what will happen next.

                  If only the wood would not break.

                  But I'm sure it won’t break it.
                  As it turned out, he does not know how to make friends, but he knows how to count money.
                  And it doesn’t hurt me that we are buying it for tourists, we buy tomatoes and gas. It’s at least real, you can even touch it. But America buys all its friends allies for cut green paper, starting with the Marshall Plan, and nothing - half the world in her mouth (if only in her mouth!) Looks ....
                  1. Salty 29 February 2020 17: 22 New
                    • 5
                    • 1
                    +4
                    Quote: Zoldat_A
                    If only the wood would not break

                    I agree.

                    Quote: Zoldat_A
                    But I'm sure it won’t break

                    I agree too.

                    And may the force be with us laughing
        3. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 16: 08 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          This is an official policy. it makes no sense to look at these statements at all. much more important is what happens in reality. the offensive continues. aviation works.
    4. Salty 29 February 2020 16: 30 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Quote: slavaseven
      It's time to show the eggs

      Exhibitionism in a chess tournament? Original ...
    5. Vladimir_6 29 February 2020 18: 04 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: slavaseven
      Something I'm worried about. I am worried if our Defense Ministry will surrender the back in defending Syria. It's time to show the eggs

      Better not eggs, but free will.
      1. Salty 29 February 2020 18: 10 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        Quote: Vladimir_6
        Quote: slavaseven
        Something I'm worried about. I am worried if our Defense Ministry will surrender the back in defending Syria. It's time to show the eggs

        Better not eggs, but free will.

        Oh, come on ... a crowd of creatures living on the Internet who believe that showing eggs is cool. Let them show them, preferably in the cold, preferably below 40 and with a breeze, to make it even cooler.
        1. Vladimir_6 29 February 2020 18: 25 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: SaltY
          Quote: Vladimir_6
          Quote: slavaseven
          Something I'm worried about. I am worried if our Defense Ministry will surrender the back in defending Syria. It's time to show the eggs

          Better not eggs, but free will.

          Oh, come on ... a crowd of creatures living on the Internet who believe that showing eggs is cool. Let them show them, preferably in the cold, preferably below 40 and with a breeze, to make it even cooler.

          Offering "show eggs" on the forum divorced a bit too much. Just not clear, they want to see strangers, or show their own.
          After all, there is a normal Russian word - Will.
          1. Salty 29 February 2020 18: 26 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: Vladimir_6
            Proposing "show eggs" on the forum divorced too much

            Exhibitionists sir laughing
            1. Vladimir_6 29 February 2020 18: 28 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: SaltY
              Quote: Vladimir_6
              Proposing "show eggs" on the forum divorced too much

              Exhibitionists sir laughing

              They are the very friend! hi
  4. Fedor Sokolov 29 February 2020 14: 52 New
    • 6
    • 12
    -6
    The heat has gone! If they "land" our planes, then the Khmeimim base in Latakia will also have an unprecedented blow to the village that an unprecedented blow from the Turkish-controlled terrorists with the support of the Turkish army will fall to the village. All this has a completely undisguised goal, to remove its allies from Syria, overthrow the legitimate authorities and immerse the country in a situation of controlled chaos, following the example of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, in order to calmly pump out natural resources.
    1. Romario_Argo 29 February 2020 14: 55 New
      • 6
      • 10
      -4
      If they land our planes

      it will only mean
      that the Russian Federation will transfer CAA a couple more divisions S-300PMU2, 6 Armor, 6 Tori
      1. Fedor Sokolov 29 February 2020 15: 00 New
        • 6
        • 14
        -8
        Through the Bosphorus it will be difficult to do! If only by air, and even then this is unlikely to help, Turkey has 200 F-16 aircraft of various modifications and strike UAVs of their own production, they jumped us in this.
        1. Romario_Argo 29 February 2020 15: 10 New
          • 9
          • 3
          +6
          Turkey has 200 F-16 aircraft in service

          which are dispersed: Cyprus (24), Istanbul (24), Ankara (24), on the border with Azerbaijan (24)
          700 km fall on the border with Syria. and 4 airbases x 24 = 100 F-16
          in Latakia there are 8 PU Buk x 4 zur = 32 SAM,
          in Masiaf S-300PMU2 16PU x 4 = 64 SAM 48N6E2 - 200 km. to Manbridge
          total 96 Zur in volley against 100 F-16
          + there are 6 Mig-29, 11 Mig-25 SAA in Khmeimim with R-27 missiles with a range of up to 70 km
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. voyaka uh 29 February 2020 18: 01 New
              • 2
              • 4
              -2
              Naturally.
              As soon as the Tigers were removed to plug the breakthrough on highway number 5,
              the entire southern front of Idlib began to crumble.
              The left small garrisons ran.
        2. Livonetc 29 February 2020 15: 12 New
          • 8
          • 2
          +6
          According to the Bosphorus Fedor.
          According to the Bosphorus.
          That's just what BDK Orsk passed.
          What is there in the holds is unknown.
          And transit is not stopped.
          And the volume of already delivered but not delivered systems is unknown.
          And why does not delivery by air help?
          Air defense systems are delivered to themselves quite well.
          And the ignorance of the Turks that in fact is already located in Syria does not add courage to them.
          And the more Turkish “martyrs” will return to their homeland, the morale of the descendants of the Janissaries will fall.
          And the electorate will not be pleased with the sultan.
        3. Rostislav 29 February 2020 15: 21 New
          • 3
          • 7
          -4
          , Turkey is armed with 200 F-16 aircraft of various modifications and shock UAVs of its own production

          So what? They can be involved only in the event of a serious conflict, and there alone will not cost airplanes. You can go to the Turks and from the Black Sea. And finally take control of the Bosphorus.
          1. Altai72 29 February 2020 17: 36 New
            • 2
            • 6
            -4
            laughing our strategists are not extinct!
        4. kventinasd 29 February 2020 16: 27 New
          • 4
          • 5
          -1
          Quote: Fedor Sokolov
          Turkey has 200 F-16 aircraft in service

          These planes will still need to take off. If something, God forbid, be with Khmeimim, then all military airfields in Turkey will be destroyed first.
          1. Altai72 29 February 2020 17: 42 New
            • 1
            • 5
            -4
            Did he even believe what he said?
    2. poquello 29 February 2020 14: 58 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      Quote: Fedor Sokolov
      If they land our planes,

      ) let me ask how they "land"?
      1. Fedor Sokolov 29 February 2020 15: 10 New
        • 5
        • 10
        -5
        Fighters will fly along the Turkish-Syrian border, preventing our VKS and the Syrian Air Force from working from the air + Americans can secretly pull the Patriots to the border.
        1. poquello 29 February 2020 19: 01 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Fedor Sokolov
          Fighters will fly along the Turkish-Syrian border without letting our air forces and the Syrian air force work from the air

          will fly with posters?
          1. Salty 29 February 2020 19: 12 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: poquello
            Quote: Fedor Sokolov
            Fighters will fly along the Turkish-Syrian border without letting our air forces and the Syrian air force work from the air

            will fly with posters?

            I imagined firsthand, laughed a lot. I'm afraid now that he will dream of me at night. A fighter with a poster flying strictly along the border. laughing
      2. Zoldat_A 29 February 2020 16: 11 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Quote: poquello
        Quote: Fedor Sokolov
        If they land our planes,

        ) let me ask how they "land"?

        I would also be interested to see how this can be physically done not at the UN, but in Syria. It’s easy at the UN - but in Syria you can catch it by the horns ...
    3. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 15: 06 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      how do they land them?))) conjure?)))
      1. Fedor Sokolov 29 February 2020 15: 29 New
        • 4
        • 6
        -2
        They can use electronic warfare systems against our airplanes if they can’t borrow enough from Israel, they have the same interests regarding Syria, and the restoration of the territorial integrity of the SAR under the leadership of Bashar Assad is not necessary.
        1. poquello 29 February 2020 19: 05 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Quote: Fedor Sokolov
          They can use electronic warfare systems against our aircraft if they can’t borrow enough from Israel,

          it was the Jews from dill who lent chain mail to interfere with ours, after which the chain mail was safely burned from overload
        2. Salty 29 February 2020 19: 16 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: Fedor Sokolov
          They can use electronic warfare systems against our planes if they can’t borrow enough from Israel

          Yes of course. "Turks with Israel are brothers forever." You really do not write nonsense.
    4. Black_Vatnik 29 February 2020 15: 25 New
      • 10
      • 2
      +8
      Assad could be removed in 2015, when he had, under the windows, roughly speaking, fights. Let me remind you, when the Russian Aerospace Forces entered the mess in the fall of 2015, the bearded men had to add up to Damascus. Now Erdogan is fighting for Idlib, partly so that his small oil business does not interrupt, partly because he is not particularly popular with the enlightened part of his country, and the “small victorious” is what the doctor ordered. For the United States, he is a useful bulldog, no more. Yes, they will support him in some way, but until a certain point. Since even in 2015, when the Russian Aerospace Forces took away the victory and defeat of Assad from the “democratic forces” from under their noses, the United States merged just in case when Erdogan shot down our plane. And now it will be approximately the same: Erdogan will play the cool Sultan, perhaps he will even take a bold step - an open blow to the Russian forces - but then the United States, as it was in 2015, will say "We ... this is, in we won’t poke the conflict between Russia and Turkey. Recep, answer yourself, since he did things and don’t get NATO involved here, the fifth article is not written for you. "
      The difference between Syria 2020 and Afghanistan, Libya and Iraq is that Syria has been holding on for 9 years, and Syria has gone through much more difficult times. Iran’s factor should not be ruled out, they still haven’t taken off the flag of revenge, and I’m sure they’ve not stopped grinding since the beginning of January.
    5. Dimak 29 February 2020 22: 11 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Fedor Sokolov
      pump out natural resources.
      What resources are there?
  5. New Year day 29 February 2020 14: 57 New
    • 8
    • 5
    +3
    rates are rising. States are interested in strengthening the confrontation, not forgetting their margins in this region.
    1. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 15: 06 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      as if before this was not so)
    2. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 15: 35 New
      • 9
      • 17
      -8
      Quote: Silvestr
      rates are rising. States are interested in strengthening the confrontation, not forgetting their margins in this region.

      Hello Sylvester hi . You are absolutely right. Many still still do not understand why this is the Kremlin, as a result of surrendering 08,08,08 and in the Donbass in the war, it has been in Syria for so many years. And that for so many years propaganda has betrayed victory.
      Because it was beneficial to someone from the very beginning. I’ll just remind you that both 08.08.08 and Donbass did not reach their logical conclusion and didn’t politically record victory after the urgent arrivals of Western mediators. After negotiations with which, Putin wandered and victory lost control. So why is it wrong in Syria? But because when we got into the Syrian civil war, I’m sure that in the USA we thumped for a week with joy. If in the Caucasus and Ukraine it was very difficult for anyone to lose the Russian Federation - a common border, convenient logistics, a strong army, partially friendly population, etc. etc. These Western intermediaries appeared and very quickly terminated the successful operation, because without political fixation of victory, military victory loses its meaning.
      But in Syria, just the opposite is true. Here, the chances of the Russian Federation to defeat are much higher than to win. We were allowed to get involved and get stuck there, and no Western mediators this time arrived anywhere and did not twist our hands. We ourselves, thanks to the "wisest megastrateg", climbed into the trap on our own. And now the final stage has begun - the Kremlin’s choice between military defeat or shame. And this is a very difficult choice, because both will instantly lead to a sharp increase in anti-government sentiment in the Russian Federation. And, most likely, it will act as a trigger for the beginning of the active phase of unrest in the country.

      PS I am specially writing for supporters of the idea that Russia, for the sake of victory in Syria, must by all means wag its head around Turkey, so that the Turks would know "who should lift their tail".
      You come home, gather your whole family and explain to your wife, children, parents that tomorrow they will all burn up in a nuclear fire. And to a fair question, why is it suddenly necessary and who attacked the country? Explain that such a need arose from the fact that at first it was a question of the Qatari gas pipeline, then of Assad’s victory in the civil war, and then just something went wrong. In general, everyone should go to the bathhouse, put on clean clothes and get ready. I hope that after such a justification, your wives will find something heavy at hand and they will lead you into jitteriness, well, or they will call an ambulance as a variant.
      1. Lord of the Sith 29 February 2020 15: 56 New
        • 17
        • 5
        +12
        The Kremlin, eventually turning back in the war 08,08,08 and in the Donbass

        What? Which in one place passed back? Georgia and Ukraine have just merged to the fullest; they still consider losses due to their adventures, in manpower and territory.
        Now there is not Georgia and Ukraine.

        And about nuclear weapons, what are you saying? What kind of incredible nonsense is this? No one in their right mind will use it for this reason. In ill health too.
        1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 16: 04 New
          • 6
          • 9
          -3
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          The Kremlin, eventually turning back in the war 08,08,08 and in the Donbass

          What? Which in one place passed back? Georgia and Ukraine have just merged to the fullest; they still consider losses due to their adventures, in manpower and territory.
          Now there is not Georgia and Ukraine.

          And about nuclear weapons, what are you saying? What kind of incredible nonsense is this? No one in their right mind will use it for this reason. In ill health too.

          Well, if you consider "victory" that instead of the pro-Russian leadership in power in these countries are anti-Russian. That of course, merged. But for whom? Under NATO? Where are the political results of the victory? Or you as Partos:
          They took part in the war, missed it to the end and then surrendered all this to their opponents.
          1. Lord of the Sith 29 February 2020 16: 41 New
            • 7
            • 2
            +5
            And you, sorry for the question, where? Where do you live? Were there the above-mentioned newly formed republics? What exactly is the reason.
            1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 18: 06 New
              • 1
              • 5
              -4
              Quote: Lord of the Sith
              And you, sorry for the question, where? Where do you live? Were there the above-mentioned newly formed republics? What exactly is the reason.

              Voronezh we. In the newly formed republics (I don’t really understand exactly which ones) I was not.
          2. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 18: 04 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            and you forgive me for taking that the goal was to establish their authority there? at least one person said this from the leadership? it's certainly cool to summarize while substituting goals, but then have a conscience.
            1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 18: 10 New
              • 1
              • 6
              -5
              Quote: carstorm 11
              and you forgive me for taking that the goal was to establish their authority there? at least one person said this from the leadership? it's certainly cool to summarize while substituting goals, but then have a conscience.

              And what was the purpose in the Donbass? Call then our conscientious.
              1. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 18: 22 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                purpose of what? you know that we’re not fighting there, is it true? and who needs help. republics live. bad but nonetheless. you confuse your Wishlist and the interests of the state as a whole. they don’t have to match or like someone. they just are.
                1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 18: 29 New
                  • 0
                  • 6
                  -6
                  Quote: carstorm 11
                  purpose of what? you know that we’re not fighting there, is it true? and who needs help. republics live. bad but nonetheless. you confuse your Wishlist and the interests of the state as a whole. they don’t have to match or like someone. they just are.

                  Those. Are you trying to explain to me that even though
                  cool to summarize at the same time substituting goals but have a conscience.
                  you yourself will not name the goals. Did I understand you correctly? You are not worthy.
                  1. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 18: 44 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    I will not name. I just don’t know them. the only thing I heard from the country's leadership is that Russia is not a party to the conflict. impolite? but there are claims to what I said?)
                    1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 18: 50 New
                      • 0
                      • 4
                      -4
                      Quote: carstorm 11
                      I will not name. I just don’t know them. the only thing I heard from the country's leadership is that Russia is not a party to the conflict. impolite? but there are claims to what I said?)

                      Claims? To you? How is it possible?
                      it's certainly cool to sum up while replacing goals but have a conscience.

                      but there are claims to what I said?)

                      I will not name. I just don’t know them.


                      PS But then you, not knowing the goals yourself, know for sure that I replaced them. Good luck to you. hi True and logical you are ours.
                      1. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 18: 56 New
                        • 6
                        • 0
                        +6
                        exactly what they replaced. Georgia has been forced to peace. the task of changing power did not sound but you say that this is a defeat. in the Donbass we are not a party to the conflict but you say shame. I focus only on official statements and persons. you are on your own fantasies. that's all.
                  2. poquello 29 February 2020 19: 12 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Leshy1975
                    goals you will not name. Did I understand you correctly? You are not worthy.

                    Would you smoke something on 08.08.08, there was an attack on Ossetians, Tbilisi is a desirable but not mandatory task
        2. New Year day 29 February 2020 18: 20 New
          • 5
          • 6
          -1
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          Georgia and Ukraine just merged in full

          what is this expressed in?
          1. Lord of the Sith 29 February 2020 19: 44 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Plum is expressed in plum. That Ukraine, that Georgia, with a bang, deformed all polymers. Now there is a shaky semblance of peace, but time is clearly not working in favor of under-states hostile to Russia.
            1. New Year day 29 February 2020 19: 58 New
              • 4
              • 2
              +2
              Quote: Lord of the Sith
              That Ukraine, that Georgia, with a bang, deformed all polymers.

              Well, I conditionally agree. And what is Russia's gain in these cases?
              The war is going on in the Donbass, people are dying, the status of LDN has frozen, sanctions are continuing.
              1. Lord of the Sith 29 February 2020 20: 23 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                To understand this, you need to analyze all the conflicts in which Russia has participated since 1991. The answer is on the surface.
                I will not take away from you the opportunity to think with your brain and conduct a simple analysis))
      2. Victorio 29 February 2020 17: 09 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Leshy1975
        And now the final stage has begun - the Kremlin’s choice between military defeat or shame

        ====
        the final there is already a year. what is the defeat, leave the idlib to the Turks?
        1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 18: 12 New
          • 1
          • 5
          -4
          Quote: Victorio
          Quote: Leshy1975
          And now the final stage has begun - the Kremlin’s choice between military defeat or shame

          ====
          the final there is already a year. what is the defeat, leave the idlib to the Turks?

          If Idlib was left to the Turks, after all that was said about the fight against terrorists, and at least the same Lavrov, then of course this will not be a defeat for the Russian Federation. But it will be a shame. Because it will be called - well, I couldn’t request
          1. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 18: 26 New
            • 7
            • 0
            +7
            are you normal he was under them. what a shame what defeat? The Syrians are trying to recapture Idlib. people are fighting for their homeland. we officially declare the integrity of Syria and help them in this. there are also Kurds, is it also us a shame to sew on? Russia voiced its interests right away. fight against terrorists. Do you think we are doing poorly with this? something else is a backstage game and you and I are not affected by the word at all.
            1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 18: 35 New
              • 1
              • 7
              -6
              Quote: carstorm 11
              Russia voiced its interests right away. fight against terrorists. Do you think we are doing poorly with this? something else is a backstage game and you and I are not affected by the word at all.

              Answer me two direct questions, you are our true.
              1) What is the goal of the Russian Federation in Syria?
              2) And the agreements of the Russian Federation and Turkey, when this samfy Idlib was given to the Turks, without Syria, was it a fight against terrorists or backroom games?
              1. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 18: 51 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                1. the fight against terrorism. nothing else we officially declared there.
                2. Who and what did the Turks give it to you, ask Morpheus who sends you dreams. there they made a security zone supported by official Damascus. if you don’t know google. De facto, taking into account the conditions outlined by the President of Russia - security guarantees in the created zones by Russia, Iran and Turkey and the right for each of the three countries to send troops there, Vladimir Putin also said during a joint press conference with Erdogan , the created zones should de facto secure the military presence of Russia, Turkey and Iran in the region and the corresponding zones of influence. This primarily concerns Turkey and the zone in the province of Idlib, directly adjacent to its borders. Russia and Iran, in turn, expect that relative stabilization in the area of ​​security zones will help redistribute forces in favor of an attack on Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor. So these are not backroom games, but the possibility of maneuver was to implement military plans in other places. The Turks screwed up and now had to decide the issue there. Everything is very simple and predictable.
                1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 19: 01 New
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  -2
                  Quote: carstorm 11
                  1. the fight against terrorism. nothing else we officially declared there.

                  I probably will limit myself to this, in communicating with you, you are our honest.
                  Source rg.ru:
                  "Russia and President Putin have the only goal - ensure a political settlement in Syria, the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Syria. This is precisely what all actions in Syria are aimed at, "the Kremlin representative concluded.

                  PS And the fact that you just did exactly what you accused me of above:
                  of course cool to summarize while replacing goals but have a conscience.
                  for you this is obviously not at all shameful, you are our conscience.
                  1. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 19: 05 New
                    • 3
                    • 1
                    +2
                    do you seriously understand the differences between political and military goals?))))) I didn’t discuss politics with you at all))) when you insert some texts at least read them to ensure a political settlement in Syria, the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Syria . it’s rather strange to discuss with a person who doesn’t see the difference between this ... military action. wrong address.
                    1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 19: 13 New
                      • 2
                      • 2
                      0
                      Quote: carstorm 11
                      you seriously do not understand the difference between political and military goals?))))) I didn’t discuss politics with you at all ))) when you insert some texts at least read them to ensure a political settlement in Syria, the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Syria

                      I didn’t discuss politics with you [/ b]

                      and you forgive me for taking that the goal was to establish their authority there?


                      Citizen carstorm 11 (Dmitry) I’m completely not interested further what you discussed there and what not. I do not like snakes in a frying pan, especially when they wriggle strongly. Good luck.
                      1. carstorm 11 29 February 2020 19: 20 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Well, you’re definitely talking to the mirror) who’s spinning is you. mixing political and military goals together. I advise you to take care of time and study the interpretation of concepts for a start. And only then to express my phi) I am taking my leave for the sim.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                    2. Salty 29 February 2020 19: 26 New
                      • 4
                      • 2
                      +2
                      It seems to me that you are trying to convince artificial intelligence:

                      Quote: carstorm 11
                      Do you seriously understand the differences between political and military goals?

                      Once again I will quote, in my opinion, to the place:

                      Quote: Moskovit
                      It's funny to watch troll tantrums. Countless times Putin has merged Donbass and Syria. But for some reason, the Ukrainian military periodically wash themselves with blood when they try to at least enter the land of LDNR, and the territory controlled by Assad is growing from year to year. I believe this time there will be a similar "drain"
                  2. Victorio 1 March 2020 10: 35 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    Quote: Leshy1975
                    "Russia and President Putin have the only goal - to ensure a political settlement in Syria, the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Syria. That is what all actions in Syria are aimed at," the Kremlin representative concluded.

                    ===
                    ?! you really do not understand / do not distinguish between political statements and the real goals of certain actions of governments (any)
              2. poquello 29 February 2020 19: 23 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Leshy1975
                Answer me two direct questions, you are our true.

                I answer, the most true of those who justified;
                The goal of the Russian Federation in Syria is the fight against terrorists and the restoration of peace, Idlib was given to the Turks on the condition that they disarm the Barmels, finish off the terrorists and organize a negotiation unification process. And where did the Turks do what?
                1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 19: 33 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Quote: poquello
                  Quote: Leshy1975
                  Answer me two direct questions, you are our true.

                  I answer, the most true of those who justified;
                  The goal of the Russian Federation in Syria is the fight against terrorists and the restoration of peace, Idlib was given to the Turks on the condition that they disarm the Barmels, finish off the terrorists and organize a negotiation unification process. And where did the Turks do what?

                  Kindly lead the source, so that I can verify your accuracy and correctness. And how much this quotation coincides with another official interpretation, where in particular there is no mention of terrorists at all (Source rg.ru):
                  "Russia and President Putin have the only goal - to ensure a political settlement in Syria, the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Syria. That is what all actions in Syria are aimed at," the Kremlin representative concluded. hi
                  1. poquello 29 February 2020 19: 37 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: Leshy1975
                    Kindly lead the source, so that I can verify your accuracy and correctness. And how much this quotation coincides with another official interpretation, where in particular there is no mention of terrorists at all (Source rg.ru):

                    oh yes, exactly, the source
                    The goal of the Russian Federation in Syria is the fight against terrorists and the restoration of peace, Idlib was given to the Turks on the condition that they disarm the Barmels, finish off the terrorists and organize a negotiation unification process.

                    (Source Poquello)
                    1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 19: 41 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: poquello
                      Quote: Leshy1975
                      Kindly lead the source, so that I can verify your accuracy and correctness. And how much this quotation coincides with another official interpretation, where in particular there is no mention of terrorists at all (Source rg.ru):

                      oh yes, exactly, the source
                      The goal of the Russian Federation in Syria is the fight against terrorists and the restoration of peace, Idlib was given to the Turks on the condition that they disarm the Barmels, finish off the terrorists and organize a negotiation unification process.

                      (Source Poquello)

                      In the future, can I consider your opinion as an official opinion of the Russian Federation?
                      1. poquello 29 February 2020 20: 39 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        In the future, can I consider your opinion as an official opinion of the Russian Federation?

                        if you can read anything more religion does not allow
                        Lavrov said that the Russian side confirms "full commitment to the agreements that were reached between the presidents of Russia and Turkey regarding what needs to be done in the Idlib de-escalation zone," TASS reports.

                        According to these agreements, it is necessary "to dissociate the normal opposition from the terrorists, to demilitarize the inner belt in this zone so that no one could fire at the positions of the SAR, the Russian military base, and ensure unhindered use of the highways that pass through this zone."

                        All of this "remains our common goals with our Turkish colleagues," and "to fulfill these goals, we still need to begin, because nothing has worked out for a year and a half."
                  2. Salty 29 February 2020 21: 01 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    Quote: Leshy1975
                    Kindly bring the source, so that I can verify your accuracy and correctness

                    God, how everything is running ... here, study:

                    Quote: Sochi Agreement text
                    1. Both sides reaffirm their commitment to preserving the political unity and territorial integrity of Syria and protecting Turkey’s national security.
                    2. They emphasize their determination to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and frustrate the separatist plans in Syria.
                    3. Within this framework, during the operation “Source of Peace”, a 32-km-deep security zone will be established covering Tel Abyad and Ras al-Ain.
                    4. Both parties affirm the importance of the Adana Agreement. In this situation, the Russian Federation will facilitate the implementation of the Adan Agreement.
                    5. Starting at 12.00:23 p.m. on October 30, the Russian military police and the Syrian border guard outside the Source of Peace territory will enter the Syrian side of the Turkish-Syrian border in order to distance self-defense units to a depth of 150 km from the Turkish-Syrian border, which should be completed for 10 hours. From this moment, joint Russian-Turkish patrols will begin to operate in the western and eastern regions of the Source of Peace zone to a depth of XNUMX km, with the exception of the city of Kamyshly.
                    6. All self-defense units and their weapons will be eliminated from Manbij and Tal Rifat.
                    7. Both parties will take the necessary measures to prevent the penetration of terrorist elements.
                    8. In order to monitor and coordinate the implementation of this memorandum, a joint monitoring and verification mechanism will be established.
                    9. Both sides will continue to work on a long-term political solution to the Syrian conflict within the framework of the mechanism developed in Astana.

                    The current actions of the CAA are a consequence of Turkey’s violation of this agreement.
                    1. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 21: 09 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: SaltY
                      Quote: Leshy1975
                      Kindly bring the source, so that I can verify your accuracy and correctness

                      God, how everything is running ... here, study:

                      Quote: Sochi Agreement text
                      1. Both sides reaffirm their commitment to preserving the political unity and territorial integrity of Syria and protecting Turkey’s national security.
                      2. They emphasize their determination to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and frustrate the separatist plans in Syria.
                      3. Within this framework, during the operation “Source of Peace”, a 32-km-deep security zone will be established covering Tel Abyad and Ras al-Ain.
                      4. Both parties affirm the importance of the Adana Agreement. In this situation, the Russian Federation will facilitate the implementation of the Adan Agreement.
                      5. Starting at 12.00:23 p.m. on October 30, the Russian military police and the Syrian border guard outside the Source of Peace territory will enter the Syrian side of the Turkish-Syrian border in order to distance self-defense units to a depth of 150 km from the Turkish-Syrian border, which should be completed for 10 hours. From this moment, joint Russian-Turkish patrols will begin to operate in the western and eastern regions of the Source of Peace zone to a depth of XNUMX km, with the exception of the city of Kamyshly.
                      6. All self-defense units and their weapons will be eliminated from Manbij and Tal Rifat.
                      7. Both parties will take the necessary measures to prevent the penetration of terrorist elements.
                      8. In order to monitor and coordinate the implementation of this memorandum, a joint monitoring and verification mechanism will be established.
                      9. Both sides will continue to work on a long-term political solution to the Syrian conflict within the framework of the mechanism developed in Astana.

                      The current actions of the CAA are a consequence of Turkey’s violation of this agreement.

                      Thank you for condescending to communicating with AI. You are Turks, will you stop or destroy this list of items now? Or did you just want to chat with AI? Actually, initially it was about the purpose of finding the Russian Federation in Syria in general. Idlib is already particular. Which, incidentally, as well as the stated goals of the Russian Federation in Syria, are NOT achievable in the foreseeable future. You can even scatter these arrangements as leaflets over Turkish positions. Suddenly they will feel ashamed and they will go home. All at once. Greetings to you from AI. hi
                      1. Salty 29 February 2020 21: 24 New
                        • 3
                        • 2
                        +1
                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        Greetings to you from AI

                        Well, don’t be offended right away. As soon as I make sure that your intelligence is natural, I will immediately apologize to you.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        initially it was about the goals of finding the Russian Federation in Syria in general

                        Read all the text of the agreement:

                        Quote: Sochi Accords, fragment
                        1. Both sides reaffirm their commitment to preserving the political unity and territorial integrity of Syria and protecting Turkey’s national security.
                        2. They emphasize their determination to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and frustrate the separatist plans in Syria.

                        Here are the very goals that you have been trying out for so long.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        You are Turks, will you stop or destroy this list of items now?

                        I repeat, this document, or rather, Turkey’s failure to comply with it, is the basis for CAA actions in this area. What is called “for the prosecutor”, if served, you’ll understand what it is about smile
                      2. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 21: 49 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Quote: SaltY
                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        Greetings to you from AI

                        Well, don’t be offended right away. As soon as I make sure that your intelligence is natural, I will immediately apologize to you.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        initially it was about the goals of finding the Russian Federation in Syria in general

                        Read all the text of the agreement:

                        Quote: Sochi Accords, fragment
                        1. Both sides reaffirm their commitment to preserving the political unity and territorial integrity of Syria and protecting Turkey’s national security.
                        2. They emphasize their determination to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and frustrate the separatist plans in Syria.

                        Here are the very goals that you have been trying out for so long.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        You are Turks, will you stop or destroy this list of items now?

                        I repeat, this document, or rather, Turkey’s failure to comply with it, is the basis for CAA actions in this area. What is called “for the prosecutor”, if served, you’ll understand what it is about smile

                        I'm not holding a grudge. This is my humor. I’ll try to explain to you again. Initially, the goals of our participation, even before Idlib, were different. Neither Turkey nor the transfer of any territories under its control appeared at all. On the contrary, the agreement on Idlib contradicts the originally stated goals (Peskov quote) - Russia and President Putin have the only goal - to ensure a political settlement in Syria, Syria's territorial integrity and sovereignty. That is what all actions in Syria are aimed at.

                        What was later recorded in the agreement with Turkey was no longer logical. Since they gave the territory under the control of another state. Moreover, it was known for a long time that this state shows any interest in its influence in these territories. In simple language - let the goat into the garden. And you can check, it remains in the comments - I immediately criticized such a decision.
                        Now, as for the prosecutor. You can sign at least a hundred papers, but if there is no military force to confirm this paper in practice, it can be safely used for another purpose. Understand that in the modern world everyone has long spat on all legitimacy and the UN is dead. And the new world order, with a new international, really acting arbiter - organization, will be established as a result of a new clash of powers and a new division of the World into zones of influence. Most likely this clash will indeed be fought through hybrid wars. With an imaginary cover of legality. But if the hybrid war in Ukraine, the Russian Federation had a good chance to win, which was confirmed by the events in the Crimea, then in Syria we will lie down. And did we need it? Start where the chances are minimal. That's all my (AI) position. Nothing more. hi

                        PS Agreement? Well, let me and I will sign you something, to the heap. Yet they sign and all do not fulfill. And what is worse than AI. laughing
                      3. Salty 29 February 2020 22: 03 New
                        • 3
                        • 2
                        +1
                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        On the contrary, the agreement on Idlib contradicts the originally stated goals (Peskov quote) - Russia and President Putin have the only goal - to ensure a political settlement in Syria, the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Syria

                        It does not contradict at all. On the contrary, it (the agreement) is one of the steps to achieve this ultimate goal, see paragraphs 1 and 2 of the agreement.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        What was later recorded in the agreement with Turkey was no longer logical. Since they gave the territory under the control of another state. Moreover, it was known for a long time that this state shows any interest in its influence in these territories. In plain language - let the goat into the garden

                        You only forgot that in fact this goat was already in the garden. Having concluded an agreement with him, they put on him something like a muzzle so that he would not eat everything that got on his tooth. And they obligated to clean up the garden, which the goat didn’t do. Now the goat is kicked for it, and he, of course, is dissatisfied with this and snarls.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        You can sign at least a hundred papers, but if there is no military force to confirm this paper in practice, it can be safely used for another purpose

                        So the fact of the matter is that this power is there! What CAA has demonstrated. Is not it so?

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        in Syria we will lay

                        But where did you get this? Everything only begins there, if you are talking about the Turks.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        let me sign you something up to the heap. Still sign and all do not fulfill

                        Sign me a gift certificate for your apartment, or a receipt that I bought it from you. And I'll see how you succeed in not doing this. Most likely, you are still not an AI, the AI ​​would never have thought of substituting this way.
                      4. Leshy1975 29 February 2020 22: 16 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Quote: SaltY
                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        On the contrary, the agreement on Idlib contradicts the originally stated goals (Peskov quote) - Russia and President Putin have the only goal - to ensure a political settlement in Syria, the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Syria

                        It does not contradict at all. On the contrary, it (the agreement) is one of the steps to achieve this ultimate goal, see paragraphs 1 and 2 of the agreement.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        What was later recorded in the agreement with Turkey was no longer logical. Since they gave the territory under the control of another state. Moreover, it was known for a long time that this state shows any interest in its influence in these territories. In plain language - let the goat into the garden

                        You only forgot that in fact this goat was already in the garden. Having concluded an agreement with him, they put on him something like a muzzle so that he would not eat everything that got on his tooth. And they obligated to clean up the garden, which the goat didn’t do. Now the goat is kicked for it, and he, of course, is dissatisfied with this and snarls.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        You can sign at least a hundred papers, but if there is no military force to confirm this paper in practice, it can be safely used for another purpose

                        So the fact of the matter is that this power is there! What CAA has demonstrated. Is not it so?

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        in Syria we will lay

                        But where did you get this? Everything only begins there, if you are talking about the Turks.

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        let me sign you something up to the heap. Still sign and all do not fulfill

                        Sign me a gift certificate for your apartment, or a receipt that I bought it from you. And I'll see how you succeed in not doing this. Most likely, you are still not an AI, the AI ​​would never have thought of substituting this way.

                        We will wait a few days for the development of events in Idlib .. If you want, go to the topic: The Syrian army has been holding positions for three days under the blows of militants. There, at the bottom of the discussion, otstoy (otstoy) laid out a map that he had lost the SAA for today - everything that the 25th division had recaptured for several weeks.

                        PS Wait, you will be disappointed with the events. hi But I will not sign anything. I thought you had some kind of agreement, but you immediately wave to the property. Do not put a finger in your mouth. AI cannot exist without an outlet. laughing
                      5. Salty 29 February 2020 22: 25 New
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        +2
                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        There, at the bottom of the discussion, otstoy (otstoy) laid out a map that he had lost CAA for today - everything that the 25th division had recaptured for several weeks

                        Do you know the joke about the battles for the hut of the forester, of course?

                        Quote: Leshy1975
                        Wait, you will be disappointed with the events.

                        Oh, how many times in my life I have heard this ... one thing you said correctly - let's wait and observe the situation. We are waiting, watching ...
  • New Year day 29 February 2020 18: 17 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Quote: Leshy1975
    And this is a very difficult choice.

    . Hey. totally agree
  • lopvlad 29 February 2020 16: 19 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Quote: Silvestr
    rates are rising.


    the only one for whom the rates are raised is Erdogan and he raised them by himself in his dope.
    1. New Year day 29 February 2020 18: 18 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Quote: lopvlad
      he raised them himself out of his dope.

      is he a fool ....? laughing The most disastrous thing is to underestimate the enemy. East is a delicate matter. Stupid people do not fall into power
      1. lopvlad 2 March 2020 20: 26 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Silvestr
        Stupid people do not fall into power


        different people fall into power, especially in the wake of populism and those who can tell tales.
  • Vladyka Ecumenical 29 February 2020 15: 14 New
    • 1
    • 8
    -7
    And so it happened that Poland hosted the largest military exercises of NATO, about 37 thousand soldiers, more than 20 thousand Americans.
    In short, the most interesting thing is how Volodya will destroy it, because if you pass the back one, it’s gone, everyone who is not too lazy to wipe their feet about Russia will definitely not enter the war. So what decision will He make ...
    1. Stalllker 29 February 2020 15: 24 New
      • 7
      • 6
      +1
      Normally, he will resolve this, as always. While he replayed them
  • Xenofont 29 February 2020 15: 18 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    So I can’t understand the helplessness of Syrian air defense: Haftarych only yesterday drove into the ground 4 Turkish drone drone with the same Shells as Assad. By the way, the shell destroyed allegedly by the Turks belongs to the Libyan. And is it .... destroyed?
    1. fk7777777 29 February 2020 15: 31 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Khotabych, a soldier all his life, knows how to beat ...
    2. gohomeyanki 29 February 2020 15: 45 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      well, they don’t cover the Turkish artillery ... as well as their observation posts.

      And the drones that shoot it are apparently ordinary quadcopters (this can be seen by the quality of the video), which are on the market for $ 100-400, it’s inappropriate to spend a rocket of $ 100 on them ...

      perhaps artillery can restrain or weaken the enemy, but in general, until the Turks entered openly with their troops ... the Syrians do not succumb to provocations, until such a plan, Putin does not like hasty decisions.
      1. Ural resident 29 February 2020 16: 01 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Quote: gohomeyanki
        well, they don’t cover the Turkish artillery ... as well as their observation posts.

        And the drones that shoot it are apparently ordinary quadcopters (this can be seen by the quality of the video), which are on the market for $ 100-400, it’s inappropriate to spend a rocket of $ 100 on them ...

        perhaps artillery can restrain or weaken the enemy, but in general, until the Turks entered openly with their troops ... the Syrians do not succumb to provocations, until such a plan, Putin does not like hasty decisions.

        Putin does not like hasty decisions at all. 5 years in the Donbass artillery points can not suppress. A kind of HPP judo: use the power of the enemy ... to let him believe in his success.
        1. gohomeyanki 29 February 2020 16: 14 New
          • 2
          • 6
          -4
          why should he do this .... if Ukrainians fools shoot at their own, this is their problem. The troops actually do not fall mainly on residential buildings.

          In fact, he created a buffer between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, and they just won’t be able to shell Russia.
  • Olya Tsako 29 February 2020 15: 19 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    It is reported that in Turkey the action of the most popular social networks is blocked. It is expected that today the authorities can officially declare war on Syria, apparently, the ability of the population to express their attitude to it has been taken under control.
    Adolf Aloizovich Erdogan bit the bit.
  • anjey 29 February 2020 15: 26 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    US will provide non-combat support to Turkey in Idlib province
    Well, the world jackals are gathering quietly in a flock around wounded Syria, which, in principle, was to be expected, going there it was of course predicted by the General Staff of the Ministry of Defense, what is Russia’s trump card ???
    And is there a political will to show the whole World that we should be respected and not scared from all sides, or will everyone be kirdyk.
  • fk7777777 29 February 2020 15: 29 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    Sinop, the city of military glory of the Russian Federation, so it would be necessary to return))), ...
    1. Ural resident 29 February 2020 16: 04 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: fk7777777
      Sinop, the city of military glory of the Russian Federation, so it would be necessary to return))), ...

      Ararat Armenians still under the guise ...
      1. Ros 56 29 February 2020 16: 12 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Well, let the Armenians fuss, we pat them on the shoulder, in the sense we will support them morally, like striped Turks. lol
  • HAM
    HAM 29 February 2020 15: 34 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    This is what only inciteers do!
    Found the Yankees du Rach Kov .... Although, this is their favorite pastime, to fight with other soldiers ...
  • Charik 29 February 2020 15: 36 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    is the State Department an analogue of our Foreign Ministry? It’s like the Pentagon’s military department
  • Garris199 29 February 2020 15: 43 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    With such rhetoric, the 58th army should already be deployed on the Armenian-Turkish border, and strategic bombers barrage at a launch distance.
    1. Victorio 29 February 2020 17: 44 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Garris199
      With such rhetoric, 58 army should already be deployed on the Armenian-Turkish border, and strategic bombers barrage at a launch distance.

      ===
      usual oriental rhetoric, drumming, playing with muscles. a very recent example - Iran
  • Sergey Medvedev 29 February 2020 15: 45 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    US promises support for Erdogan. Well, they are directly inciting Assad. Well for us, of course.
  • Ros 56 29 February 2020 16: 10 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    It’s in the sense they pat on the shoulder, but what, support too. wassat
  • Jack O'Neill 29 February 2020 16: 10 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    US will provide non-combat support to Turkey in Idlib province

    Ahah, read how: USA not will provide Turkey non-combat support in the province of Idlib laughing
    I thought everyone - sailed!
  • Andrey.AN 29 February 2020 16: 13 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The Turkish Armed Forces can still shift their arrows to the opposition, but the US cannot avoid a clash with the Russian Federation, the United States has something to support in Turkey, and the Russian Federation has something to support in Syria, and the Russian Federation has the legal right from the legitimate government of the SAR to ensure its 50 years comfortable stay in the ATS, under the contract of obligations and responsibilities of the parties.
  • askort154 29 February 2020 16: 24 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    US will provide non-combat support to Turkey in Idlib province

    The USA in Syria lost to Russia. Their main goal is that Assad was not overthrown. The United States did not dare to directly confront Russia. For consolation, they got hooked on the oil pipeline, and their entire "coalition of 63" countries went home. Erdogan blew up the situation again, wanting to show Turkey’s role in the BV, hoping that Russia would not dare to openly confront Turkey, show weakness, and in the East this is very significant.
    Realizing that Russia is not bending, but on the contrary has shown its serious intentions, having sent two frigates to the region, with a hint - you can’t take us weakly. Realizing this, Erdogan bawled before the United States and NATO, using persuasion and blackmail. I did not receive a single support. The European NATO “mumble”, while only the Greeks vetoed NATO’s decision to support Turkey in Idlib, the rest have so far abstained. Seeing this, USA
    cautiously promised non-combat support. Although clearly, the US is cunning. For them, there was again the hope of ousting Russia from Syria (BV), but already with the "cannon fodder" of Turkey.
    Now much will be decided on March 5th. Boom to hope.
  • cniza 29 February 2020 16: 43 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Meanwhile, it became known that the Pentagon opposed the deployment of the American Patriot air defense systems on the southern border of Turkey to establish a no-fly zone over Idlib.


    Well done military, they most of all understand how this can end ...
  • Ural resident 29 February 2020 17: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The theme of Turkish drones is declared publicly.
    Complete dominance in the air. Minusers - Go!)
    https://youtu.be/SvOHIaq-BF4
    https://vk.com/video-70903182_456243604
    1. Andrey.AN 29 February 2020 17: 19 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      I don’t respect minusers, well, they’re fine with me, I think they are wooden to the waist, I think of myself as deans at the institute, as if they were being bribed. Only these drones are there until they are allowed to destroy our center of reconciliation of the parties.
      1. Ural resident 29 February 2020 17: 20 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Andrey.AN
        I don’t respect minusers, well, they’re fine with me, I think they are wooden to the waist, I think of myself as deans at the institute, as if they were being bribed. Only these drones are there until they are allowed to destroy our center of reconciliation of the parties.

        How, explain
        1. Andrey.AN 29 February 2020 17: 24 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Very simple, our center of reconciliation holds the hands of the Syrian troops in the Turks, while they are beaten by the Turks. When it stops, then we'll see how long the drones live.
          1. Ural resident 29 February 2020 17: 27 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Andrey.AN
            Very simple, our center of reconciliation holds the hands of the Syrian troops in the Turks, while they are beaten by the Turks. When it stops, then we'll see how long the drones live.

            but after all, during this time, the Turks carry out equipment, including those transferred both by Russia and the soldiers, the last motivated, whom they managed to gather for military operations. This is judo so judo. Poddubny says that it’s impossible to go at all, they are even chasing motorcycles, they have knocked out all the equipment ...
            1. Andrey.AN 29 February 2020 17: 39 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              There is not much new equipment killed (for one and a half thousand Syrian tanks, it’s not critical), the SAR Armed Forces also don’t sit, take out Turkish equipment handed over to the militants, together with specialists the south of the province is sailing as it should, and Serakib will remain a disputed training ground until the agreement, then the demilitarized zone . Poddubny can be understood, he is close to those who take on all the bitterness of reducing the base of militants.
  • Klingon 29 February 2020 18: 16 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    US will provide non-combat support to Turkey in Idlib province

    Moral support? They’ll buy the flags of Turkey and will support them like they do in football. Yes. The NATO bloc is threatening. You won’t say anything. wink

    not buy flags but pink plumes, they have experience see striped football wassat
  • Arg107 29 February 2020 18: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Vladimir_6
    Quote: SaltY
    Quote: Vladimir_6
    Quote: slavaseven
    Something I'm worried about. I am worried if our Defense Ministry will surrender the back in defending Syria. It's time to show the eggs

    Better not eggs, but free will.

    Oh, come on ... a crowd of creatures living on the Internet who believe that showing eggs is cool. Let them show them, preferably in the cold, preferably below 40 and with a breeze, to make it even cooler.

    Offering "show eggs" on the forum divorced a bit too much. Just not clear, they want to see strangers, or show their own.
    After all, there is a normal Russian word - Will.

    It’s hard to get past the egg-egg theme. It catches, you know, for ... no, not for the eggs, for the living. By and large, one would have to show a fist, not an egg. But, at the same time, the sobering effect of naked eggs cannot be ruled out. I propose to the author of the idea to post a photo of the instrument of intimidation, there are a lot of experts on various types of weapons and TTX assessment at the Military Institute. In any case, it is hardly necessary to worry and worry. More expensive for yourself. Limit yourself to showing a fist, in a pinch, pinch the eggs into a fist.
  • Shahno 29 February 2020 19: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: SaltY
    Quote: Fedor Sokolov
    They can use electronic warfare systems against our planes if they can’t borrow enough from Israel

    Yes of course. "Turks with Israel are brothers forever." You really do not write nonsense.

    And why should we be enemies ... Israel is well aware of its situation. Over the fight.
    1. Salty 29 February 2020 19: 36 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Shahno
      And why should we be enemies ...

      That is, if you suddenly had extra EW lying around, do you still lend it to a Turk? laughing
  • Lord of the Sith 29 February 2020 19: 42 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Leshy1975
    Voronezh we. In the newly formed republics (I don’t really understand exactly which ones) I was not.


    Then talk better about your native Voronezh, and we in Donbass are somehow more aware of what and how.
  • flicker 1 March 2020 01: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Earlier, US Ambassador to NATO Kay Bailey Hutchinson said that the United States will provide assistance to Turkey. According to her, "all options are being considered."
    As soon as the geldings transferred Turkey to the neo-Ottoman path (admittedly, to the delight of the Turks, the provincial Turks), they immediately turned Turkey into a sacrificial ram. For, in the 21st century, neo-Ottoman ambitions are a direct path to suicide.
    Ataturk understood this, and modern Turks do not seem to understand this.
  • Chaldon48 1 March 2020 03: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Turkey would have long left Syria if the US had not forced it to continue to fight, despite the losses suffered.