Turkey showed footage of delivering a massive attack on SAA in Idlib

225

Syrian media publish video footage depicting a massive attack on CAA positions in Idlib. These attacks, as previously reported by the Turkish Ministry of Defense, were a response to the loss of 33 Turkish troops in Idlib the day before.

The Turks struck first of all with the use of drones impact type. In addition, the Turkish contingent used the means of cannon and rocket artillery.



On the frames that were shot by cameras from the UAV, it can be seen that the strikes are delivered as on separate units of armored vehicles, including Tanksand the columns of the Syrian troops. According to the Turkish side, the Assad regime’s losses suffered the most south of Serakib - on the M5 road. It should be noted that earlier in this area, militants tried to develop their success with Turkish support.

Judging by the shots, blows were also inflicted on the buildings. At the same time, the Turkish Ministry of Defense claims that all these objects belonged to the Syrian armed forces. In one video, a discussion of the situation from the passengers of the bus.


[media = https: //twitter.com/i/status/1233329093921443841]

On the frames you can see air strikes and manpower.



The Syrian side has not yet reported losses as a result of this massive Turkish strike on the positions and infrastructure of the SAA in Idlib.
  • Facebook / Ministry of Defense of Turkey
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

225 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    28 February 2020 13: 40
    Not so sickly put ..
    The strikes, by the way, are pretty accurate .. What is it they beat so ??
    1. -22
      28 February 2020 13: 43
      Quote: Roman070280
      What is it they beat so?

      By their own two hundredth

      Turkish Armed Forces liquidated as a result of an air strike by the SAR Air Force
      1. +14
        28 February 2020 13: 47
        Well, actually, about this news was yesterday ..
        And today we are discussing just the opposite ..
        In the corpses, of course, there is nothing good .. on either side ..
        1. +4
          28 February 2020 15: 57
          The strikes, by the way, are pretty accurate .. What is it they beat so ??

          Very noticeable. Compared to ours, they hit the bull's-eye directly .. The only thing is that the result can be equally fatal, although not always, if the equipment is heavily armored, and the shell is about 5 meters away from it ... We would have to make out this moment in the General Staff.
        2. -3
          28 February 2020 21: 43
          What's the news that Erdogan was called into the carpet by cancer?
      2. +1
        28 February 2020 13: 54
        Turkish Armed Forces
        Why then are they not in uniform, or is it jeans in accordance with the charter of the Turkish Armed Forces?
      3. -2
        29 February 2020 10: 42
        No, Turkey hits the fighters and equipment of the Syrian Arab army, as it is not bitter to admit it very, very successfully.

        In general, this strike is very indicative, as a demonstrator of Turkey’s capabilities on the political side of the issue and its achievements in the field of UAV strike.

        Cheap and cheerful, without risking its aviation, Turkey caused huge damage to the SSA over the day, having lost a small number of its UAVs.

        Russia does not have such UAVs, not at all !!! All that we have is an 80s level UAV. And this despite the fact that the military budget of Russia is 50 billion dollars, while Turkey has only 11-12 billion (1,2% of GDP).

        The leadership of the country needs to make a simple distribution to all who are engaged in the issue of providing the UAV army with reconnaissance and strike version !!!
    2. -1
      28 February 2020 13: 46
      Precision missiles
      1. +4
        28 February 2020 14: 03
        Nonsense. Highlighting and precision projectiles are cheaper.
    3. -8
      28 February 2020 13: 46
      heavy drones
    4. -6
      28 February 2020 14: 00
      It is necessary to do something with the drones of the Syrians. Otherwise, there will be even more losses. Or ours will help the EWs. They will land them.
      1. +1
        28 February 2020 22: 12
        If they could, then they would have planted it a long time ago.
      2. 0
        1 March 2020 21: 26
        And what are the disadvantages ???? what is said incorrectly. You have gray-humped mice. Minus the wretched.
    5. +6
      28 February 2020 14: 11
      Accurate anti-tank missiles from shock drones.
      1. +5
        28 February 2020 15: 12
        For infantry, too, ATGMs? Some gaps pull on a good jigsaw.
        1. 0
          28 February 2020 17: 19
          For infantry, too, ATGMs? Some gaps pull on a good jigsaw.


          Turkish shock UAVs have ammunition not only anti-tank, but also high-explosive.
        2. ABM
          +1
          29 February 2020 22: 15
          Self-propelled guns-155 hammer
    6. -3
      28 February 2020 14: 52
      Quote: Roman070280
      Not so sickly put ..
      The strikes, by the way, are pretty accurate.


      On the night of February 28, the Turkish army attacked the positions of the Syrian army in Idlib and destroyed a convoy of government troops. The Syrian military lost the Buk and Shell shells, 23 tanks, the same number of field and self-propelled guns, and five helicopters.
      1. -2
        28 February 2020 15: 20
        There is other information-114 soldiers, SAM (not reported) and 3 tanks ...
      2. +3
        28 February 2020 19: 02
        Quote: Orel
        Quote: Roman070280
        Not so sickly put ..
        The strikes, by the way, are pretty accurate.


        On the night of February 28, the Turkish army attacked the positions of the Syrian army in Idlib and destroyed a convoy of government troops. The Syrian military lost the Buk and Shell shells, 23 tanks, the same number of field and self-propelled guns, and five helicopters.

        According to the Turks. I doubt that the destruction of a target like the Shell would not have been shown in the video. The first argument.
        The shell is stable in southern Syria, argument 2.
        For the entire offensive, the presence in the ranks of the SAA of the Shell was never laid out. My conclusion is Ms.
        But if the photo pops up, I admit. But such thoughts.

        Also, I think the SAA headquarters was counting on a clear-sky guarantee from us, although we hardly gave it, therefore there were no such light targets as UAVs shot down by Syrian air defense.
      3. -1
        29 February 2020 19: 05
        Quote: Orel
        Buk and Pantsir complexes, 23 tanks, as many field and self-propelled guns, as well as five helicopters.

        ====
        why not 123 tanks and the same amount of everything and everyone
    7. +3
      28 February 2020 15: 00
      The strikes, by the way, are pretty accurate .. What is it they beat so ??

      Impact UAVs illuminate the target with a laser
    8. 0
      28 February 2020 15: 04
      Quote: Roman070280
      Not so sickly put ..

      As Bismarck said, most of all lie in the elections, in hunting and in war.
      So far it is clear only that the blow was struck, what its result is and what it will lead to, will be seen later.
      Unfortunately, while the Turks defending terrorists will not be able to wash their blood harder than a few dozen (maybe hundreds, for who knows the exact data?) Killed and wounded and will not suffer significant economic damage from the war, there will be no end.
      By the way, what about the Turkish checkpoints surrounded by the Syrian troops? And something is not heard about Iran, is it sustaining losses, or what?
      1. +3
        28 February 2020 15: 06
        As Bismarck said, most of all lie in the elections, in hunting and in war.

        Well, here it’s like not empty words, but real shots .. It’s not easy to refute them ..
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +1
            28 February 2020 19: 52
            Quote: Alekseev
            And since there are many players on the Syrian field, Assad’s army is far from omnipotent, it is quite possible that the matter will go to the division into zones of influence.
            Maybe it’s for the better.

            Better later
            And here is what I wrote on 13/10/9 when the Turks just started to enter Syria

            -----------------------------------------
            "And now the fun begins.
            There will begin to flock from other areas and another hot enclave will form.
            The Kurds will want to go back and a new war will begin.
            Having reached its goal, Turkey may possibly leave Syria, but again and again, if it considers it necessary, it will carry out operations.
            Iran, with its salicylates, after losing about 3 Hizbullah militants in the war, is unlikely to abandon the construction of military bases around Israel, following the example of Lebanon, and Israel will continue to destroy them.
            If you noticed after meeting with Putin, Israel stopped striking, it gives Putin the opportunity to calmly solve his tasks (just don’t write that you were scared) because then you have to change your point of view.
            And this will be until ALL and once again ALL, without exception, leave Syria and there, under the control of the UN and other interested countries, the REAL elections are held and only after that all interested countries under the leadership of the International Development Bank will begin to restore Syria.
            In the meantime, everyone uses it as he wants, regardless of the people of Syria, and this is the rake of Afghanistan.
            "
            1. +1
              29 February 2020 03: 27
              In general, until Syria comes under the control of the Pindo-Jewish capitalists? Soros, Baruch, Rockefellers and others?
      2. -6
        28 February 2020 22: 14
        The Iranians have 140x
    9. -2
      28 February 2020 17: 17
      The strikes, by the way, are pretty accurate .. What is it they beat so ??


      Apparently shock UAVs.

      It is very bad that Syria has poor air defense and very bad that Russia still does not have strike UAVs, and Turkey whose military budget is 5 times less than such UAVs, and already has its own development.
    10. +1
      28 February 2020 19: 30
      and you thought only we can cross? They direct from the drone, maybe he launches missiles.
    11. 0
      1 March 2020 00: 56
      [media = https: //youtu.be/RIy309bzR9U Cheap and cheerful, Turkish drones.]
  2. -15
    28 February 2020 13: 41
    The answer to the Turks will be even tougher.
    1. +13
      28 February 2020 14: 06
      Who will answer?
    2. +4
      28 February 2020 14: 10
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      The answer to the Turks will be even tougher.

      Than? if the info about a dozen self-propelled guns is correct, then the artifacts of the self-propelled guns are almost over.
    3. -5
      28 February 2020 22: 15
      Well, well)) have been waiting for it already)
  3. +21
    28 February 2020 13: 43
    Boasting the support of terrorists to the whole world is from a great mind?
    1. +15
      28 February 2020 13: 46
      They are there for them the same terrorists as for us-militias in the Donbass ..
      1. +11
        28 February 2020 13: 52
        Quote: Roman070280
        They are there for them the same terrorists as for us-militias in the Donbass ..

        The comparison is very incorrect! You shouldn’t be so!
        Quote: g1washntwn
        Boasting the support of terrorists to the whole world is from a great mind?

        Unfortunately, in the West they are called "about the Turkish opposition", which is an attempt to legitimize Turkey's actions.
        1. +8
          28 February 2020 13: 55
          The comparison is very incorrect!

          It may be incorrect for us .. But in fact it is so !!
          Or does anyone have doubts about how in Ukraine they relate to those who arranged several boilers for them ??
          You shouldn’t be so!
          I have nothing to do with it here .. I only clarified the situation from the outside ..
          1. -5
            28 February 2020 14: 07
            Quote: Roman070280
            I have nothing to do with it here .. I only clarified the situation from the outside ..

            I understood this, but the comparison is still incorrect especially here. hi
            1. +7
              28 February 2020 14: 12
              especially here

              This is the key problem .. I remember, but I don’t remember .. and here I wrap the fish ..
              But reality does not adapt to Wishlist ..
              1. -4
                28 February 2020 15: 00
                Quote: Roman070280
                But reality does not adapt to Wishlist ..

                The reality is this: you are in a Russian-language forum where everyone except the pan-saucepan provocateurs would not even think of calling the militias in the Donbass terrorists and, thus, becoming like the junta that is now sitting in Kiev.
                So, here without the Wishlist. That is the reality.
                1. 0
                  28 February 2020 15: 48
                  You are on a Russian-language forum where everyone but the pan-saucepan provocateurs would not even think of calling the militias in the Donbass terrorists


                  Well, now you, so as not to be like a junta, quickly find a quote where the provocateurs called the militias in the Donbass terrorists ..))

                  PS .. but in general, the interpretation itself is strange, of course .. do you think any information should come to mind depending on what language a person speaks and what forum he sits on ?? Such, obviously, narrow-mindedness ..
                  1. 0
                    28 February 2020 16: 05
                    Quote: Roman070280
                    Well, now you, so as not to be like a junta, quick you will find a quote where the provocateurs called the militia in the Donbass terrorists ..))

                    As far as I understand, your opinion is the only correct one, and for the other you are throwing munus. Well, your right and then stay with him ... one on one. And "quickly" - you run to the toilet when it gets to you.
                  2. +2
                    28 February 2020 18: 17
                    Of course in vain.
                    Terrorists are those who carry out armed acts against the local population and the government in order to spread panic, destruction and force governments to spend resources on neutralizing the consequences of terrorist acts. And all this for the sake of changing the political or economic course.
                    The guys from LDNR were not noticed in these actions.
                    Chubaty ukrosumery from the Bank of Svidomo Kostya can say anything. But the facts say that LDNR are not terrorists. What is difficult to say about the APU, which regularly conduct shelling, thereby terrorizing the civilian population.
                2. -1
                  28 February 2020 19: 14
                  in Kiev, a long-time lawfully chosen showman with whom we agree, we sign documents, etc. so these songs are about the junta, fascists, etc. you can no longer continue
          2. +11
            28 February 2020 14: 08
            Quote: Roman070280
            The comparison is very incorrect!

            But in fact
            Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and other terrorist groups maintain a large presence in Idlib. UNSCRs 2253 and 2254 called on UN member states to prevention and suppression of terrorist activities of these groups, as well as the elimination of the enclaves they created", - stressed the UN Secretary General's special envoy for Syria Geir Pedersen, speaking at a meeting of the UN Security Council.
            1. -4
              28 February 2020 14: 16
              Ask this UN special envoy about Crimea or Donbass ..
              And after you reproach me with an incorrect comparison ..))
              1. +7
                28 February 2020 14: 19
                And what about terrorists somewhere in the Donbass? belay If only in the head of the Nazis, who came to power through a coup, and destroying their own fellow citizens.
                1. -3
                  28 February 2020 14: 22
                  I will not argue about the Nazis .. this is a separate issue ..
                  It’s just that you started referring to the UN .. as the ultimate truth ..
                  I reminded you what the UN thinks about the situation with Crimea and Donbas ..
                  In our situation, it is better not to make authority out of the UN ..))
                  1. +5
                    28 February 2020 14: 28
                    I just illustrated the difference between recognized all over the world, and even the Americans, terrorist organizations in Syria and the civil militia of Donbass. Crimea is not a topic at all, thank God this topic has long been closed, and Crimea itself lives peacefully and flourishes.
                    1. -2
                      28 February 2020 14: 48
                      I just illustrated the difference between recognized all over the world, and even the Americans, terrorist organizations in Syria and the civil militia of Donbass.

                      And I have illustrated the difference between where it is profitable to refer to the UN and where it is not profitable ..

                      Crimea is not a topic at all, thank God this topic has long been closed, and Crimea itself lives peacefully and flourishes.

                      I do not argue with you in this regard !!
                      But that same UN, which considers terrorists someone there in Turkey .. believes that the Crimea is Ukrainian ..

                      Therefore .. we will believe what the UN says or not ??)
                      1. 0
                        28 February 2020 14: 56
                        Therefore .. we will believe what the UN says or not ??)

                        In this case, a reference to the United Nations implies a universally accepted opinion. And the same Turks officially agree that there are terrorists. And at the expense of the Crimea, someone has one opinion, we have a different one.
                      2. +2
                        28 February 2020 14: 59
                        In this case, a reference to the UN implies a universally accepted opinion


                        let someone have one opinion, we have another

                        This is what this is all about ... that the reference to the UN does not mean anything, because everyone has their own opinions ..
                      3. +4
                        28 February 2020 15: 06
                        This is what we are talking about ... that a reference to the UN does not mean anything ..
                        I hope the difference between "recognized by everyone" and "everyone has their own opinion" is clear enough? The reference to the UN is legitimate only in the first case, because only the terrorists themselves are against. And even then, perhaps, not a fact.
                      4. +1
                        28 February 2020 15: 10
                        I hope the difference between "recognized by everyone" and "everyone has their own opinion" is clear enough?
                        No, your jules are not obvious to me ..))

                        1. Terrorists are "recognized by all" based on the UN statement
                        Crimea, based on the statement of the same UN, is "recognized by all" whose ??

                        2. In Crimea, we have the right to "our opinion" contrary to the statements of the UN ??
                        Turks also have the right to "their opinion" ??
                      5. +3
                        28 February 2020 15: 26
                        No, your jules are not obvious to me ..))
                        I noticed, but so be it, I will explain it for the 3rd time!)
                        1. Terrorists are recognized all. Turkey Jebhat al-Nusra is recognized as a terrorist organization.
                        2. Resolution on the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Of the 193 UN member countries, 100 voted in favor, 11 voted against, 58 abstained, and 24 did not vote. Us not accepted.
                      6. -3
                        28 February 2020 15: 32
                        I will also explain it for the third time .. (or maybe already for the fourth)
                        You referred to the UN .. and you yourself stressed that you can disagree with her opinion and have your own !! Here you can put a bullet in it ..
                        And everything else is just blah blah blah .. from the category, as the Ukrainians shout - the whole world is with us ..
                        For reference - when voting at the UN it does not matter, 1 country against, 10, or not one .. Either recognized or not ..
                      7. +3
                        28 February 2020 15: 47
                        Then I will have to explain for the 4th time!)
                        The key message in my post is that terrorists are recognized by all parties. But you decided to get to the bottom of the UN. I have explained several times what is the difference between recognized by all terrorists and different opinions on the Crimea.
                        Although before that we talked about something else. I hope there will be no more parallels between the terrorists in Syria and the Donbass ?!
                      8. -4
                        28 February 2020 15: 55
                        But you decided dig down to the UN. I have explained several times what is the difference between recognized by all terrorists and different opinions on the Crimea ..
                        Not true..))
                        It was you who began to quote, citing the UN ..
                        And after my hint I corrected, and said that everyone can have their own opinion ..))
                        And therefore, if you remove this post of yours with a UN quote that does not mean anything .. due to the possibility of EVERYONE having their own opinion .. contrary to the opinions of the UN .. this whole conversation has been meaningless for a long time ..

                        I hope there will be no more parallels between the terrorists in Syria and the Donbass ?!

                        I have no parallels ..
                        But for Turkey they are the same terrorists there as for us-militias in the Donbass .. Regardless of who recognized what at the UN and what ..
                      9. +3
                        28 February 2020 16: 08
                        Ok, if in principle, forget the post about the UN and re-read what I wrote next.
                        But for Turkey they are the same terrorists as for us-militias in the Donbass ..
                        The fact of the matter is that officially in Idlib the terrorists are recognized by all parties, and for the Turks they are also terrorists (Jebhat al-Nusra, Khayyat Tahrir al-Sham and others), and therefore we can, and even are obliged, to destroy them, together with the Turks. And by whom and when was the Donbass militia recognized by terrorists? In addition to sick ukronatsistov.
            2. +5
              28 February 2020 14: 23
              Please provide an anthologic quote from a UN document, but about Donbass militias.
              1. -6
                28 February 2020 14: 25
                And here is a quote ..
                Read
                It’s just that you started referring to the UN .. as the ultimate truth ..
                I reminded you what the UN thinks about the situation with Crimea and Donbas ..
                In our situation, it is better not to make authority out of the UN ..))
            3. +3
              28 February 2020 15: 42
              Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and other terrorist groups maintain a large presence in Idlib. UNSCRs 2253 and 2254 called on countries to
              Only in these resolutions there is not a word about the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham group, just as it is not on the list of terrorist organizations anywhere else (including in Russia), thanks to which it is possible to write a name without a mark "prohibited in RF ".
          3. 0
            28 February 2020 14: 09
            Quote: Roman070280
            But in fact it is so !!

            In fact, your statement "this is exactly so" is support for lies, fakes, illegal actions and terrorists.
            1. -2
              28 February 2020 14: 24
              Not a single person here can find where and when I ever lied or brought a fake ..
              And about who considers whom whom terrorists - I already wrote above .. do not repeat ..
          4. +6
            28 February 2020 14: 24
            Quote: Roman070280
            how in Ukraine are those who arranged several boilers for them ??

            But how do people in Russia relate to those who went on tanks to ban the Russian language? Hence the boilers ...)
            1. -7
              28 February 2020 14: 35
              I didn’t ask to give me excuses for actions ..
              Come on now, and the Turks will begin to make excuses about Syria .. for sure, they also have something to "excuse themselves" with ..
              The question was direct .. and you did not answer it .. for the answer is known to both of us ..
          5. 0
            28 February 2020 14: 40
            ,, Or someone has doubts about how in Ukraine they relate to those who arranged several boilers for them ?? ,,

            You can relate as you like. But the non-recognition of illegitimate power was the right of Donbass.
            It’s all the same that the liberals dumped Putin and people, for some reason, must recognize Navalny’s power over them. It is clear that the bulk will consider them bandits, separatists, etc. But objectively, he will be wrong. It’s just the opposite.

            And you speak not just from the side, but from the side of the Maidan authorities.
            1. -2
              28 February 2020 19: 40
              those. if Putin is the way out, and bulk to the Kremlin, then the Orenburg region, for example, can get into Kazakhstan? ridiculous analogies.
              1. +1
                28 February 2020 21: 39
                Well, why only Orenburg. I live in Moscow. And I will never admit this to LGBT people.
                1. -2
                  28 February 2020 21: 56
                  what's in your head? I consider Putin / obscene expression /. and what, is this an occasion for me to advocate for a separate Kola Republic and joining Finland?
                  1. +1
                    28 February 2020 22: 20
                    You can count anyone and anyone. But we draw a parallel with Ukraine. That is, it means a change of power due to a coup, not an election.
          6. -1
            28 February 2020 15: 42
            Quote: Roman070280
            But in fact it is so !!


            in fact, in 1991, contrary to the main law of the country (the Constitution of the USSR), the annexation of Russian lands took place as a result of a conspiracy of four drunks in Belarus. ...
            I did not recognize the annexation of 1991, I do not and never will.
        2. +5
          28 February 2020 14: 05
          Quote: Kurare
          The comparison is very incorrect! You shouldn’t be so!

          Well, why, what program in cyborg, such a solution.
          1. -3
            28 February 2020 14: 08
            Exactly!!
            Unfortunately, impartially, rarely can anyone assess the situation .. as a rule, patriotism puts pressure on the brain ..
            1. +7
              28 February 2020 14: 22
              patriotism cannot put pressure on the brain; it is an intangible substance. but the pan is quite laughing
              1. 0
                28 February 2020 14: 27
                Reading some posts here .. it seems that our patriots sometimes presses harder than the neighbors of the pan ..))
              2. +6
                28 February 2020 15: 29
                Quote: serzh.kost
                patriotism cannot put pressure on the brain; it is an intangible substance. but the pan is quite

                want to say that Ukrainians are not patriots of their country? They do not know this impulse?
                1. +5
                  28 February 2020 18: 28
                  Ukrainians may or may not be patriots. You can certainly endlessly argue what patriotism is and what it should be.
                  many Ukrainians, as well as Russians are incorrectly called patriots, thanks to these the meaning of this concept was perverted.
                  "Very often people who have not done anything good for Ukraine call themselves patriots. Moreover, they use Ukraine for their own good and do not even think about working for the good of it. At best, they take care of their children (the ultimate dream is to take them abroad), at worst - about themselves (redistribution of dreams - to leave alone, or with the children.) At the same time, all their patriotism is excessive aggression, which is leveled as soon as it comes to money (there are more than enough examples - from work in Russia before Roshen and Matsola). To be a patriot for them means to hate the enemy (anyone), but not to love Ukraine. If between their own benefit and the benefit for the country they have to choose, then the choice will almost always be one-sided. And this "one side" definitely not state. "(c)
                  among Ukrainians, patriotism evolves towards Westernism and Russophobia, is full of aggression, based on other people's ideas and slogans. And the war in the southeast only pushes this.
                  the same can in principle be applied to Russian "patriots", but in Russia the majority loves Ukraine as part of the Slavic civilization and considers Ukrainians to be brothers.
                  The main vector of development of Ukrainian patriotism is fundamental Russophobia and Eurocentrism. The Ukrainian patriot, who relates Ukraine to the world common with Russia, is usually marginalized, he is in the minority. Most believe that it is copying Western experience, inclusion in the EU and NATO (and, accordingly, distancing from Russia) that will save all troubles.
                  For Russians, patriotism is almost always associated with independence (from the West), for Ukrainians - to be with someone.
              3. +2
                28 February 2020 15: 46
                Quote: serzh.kost
                but the pan


                so it is not a saucepan but a helmet of the "lizar's suite". The main zahist rosum is a kind of patriotismlol
            2. +3
              28 February 2020 14: 23
              Quote: Roman070280
              Unfortunately, impartially, rarely can anyone assess the situation .. as a rule, patriotism puts pressure on the brain.

              In this case, apparently a pan from the Maidan ... request
        3. +1
          28 February 2020 16: 27
          Quote: Kurare
          The comparison is very incorrect! You shouldn’t be so!


          1. In the Donbas live Russian-speaking people dreaming of joining Russia - Turkish-speaking people dreaming of joining Turkey in northern Syria.
          2. Donbass came to Ukraine as a result of a monstrous disaster for the Russians, the collapse of the USSR - the north of Vilaet Dimashq fell into modern Syria as a result of a monstrous catastrophe for the Turks, the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.
          3. The Kiev junta systematically imposed a Ukrainian mov and prevented the population from studying in their native Russian language - the damask junta systematically imposed an Arab mov and prevented the population from studying in their native Turkish language.
          4. At the beginning of the Kiev Maidan, the population of Donbass began to seize local administrations and hang Russian flags on them. At the beginning of the Maidan, the people of the north of Syria began to capture local administrations and hang Turkish flags on them.
          5. To help brothers, the "North Wind" blew to Donabas and many volunteers from ordinary guys, car washers, security guards came from Russia - to help their brothers, the "North Wind" blew to the regions bordering Turkey and many volunteers from Turkey came from ordinary guys, car washers, security guards.
          6. Our brothers from Donbass dream of joining the Russian world - Turkish brothers from the north of Syria dream of joining the Ottoman world.
          7. Kiev calls these people terrorists, bombes them and begs for help from the USA to destroy the separatists - Damascus calls these people terrorists, bombes them and begs for help from Russia, to destroy the separatists

          And so yes, of course, nothing in common hi
          1. +3
            28 February 2020 17: 14
            Quote: PO-tzan
            1. In the Donbas live Russian-speaking people dreaming of joining Russia - Turkish-speaking people dreaming of joining Turkey in northern Syria.

            As they say in Odessa, these are two big differences.
            There are people living in the Donbass who decided that with the new Kiev order they are not on their way. They, before the Maidan, did not dream of joining Russia, there was nothing of the kind. And Donbass did not attack the APU, but vice versa.

            In northern Syria, many live, including Kurds, who completely they do not want to join Turkey, but rather, on the contrary, take away land in the south of Turkey, where a large number of brothers live. And the desire to chop off a piece of Syria under the guise of a "civil war" is also a desire to seize / take control of very "fertile" lands for oil.

            Etc. the points. The difference is just colossal!
            1. 0
              28 February 2020 17: 29
              Quote: Kurare
              As they say in Odessa, these are two big differences.

              Spies and scouts.

              Quote: Kurare
              Many people live in northern Syria, including the Kurds, who are completely unwilling to join Turkey

              Crimean Tatars also did not really want to join the Russian Federation. AND?
              1. +2
                28 February 2020 17: 49
                Quote: PO-tzan
                Crimean Tatars also did not really want to join the Russian Federation. AND?

                Actually, there was a referendum in Crimea. If you didn’t want to, they voted against.
        4. 0
          28 February 2020 19: 11
          we ourselves recognized them as opposition and agreed on a constitutional committee, so consider that we have legalized it.
        5. 0
          29 February 2020 03: 31
          It's just like in the years of World War II - where the Germans invaded, there were "pro-German rebels" everywhere, and the Nazis appealed that they were defended! Only in the USSR, this scenario did not work, because as the US ambassador said, "they shot them" (the opposition). Nothing has changed since then.
      2. +7
        28 February 2020 13: 57
        The words forbidden by the rules are asked for your comment. This "opposition" cut heads and adolescents, including ... Is there adequateness in you?
        1. -3
          28 February 2020 14: 10
          The words forbidden by the rules are asked for your comment. This "opposition" cut heads and adolescents, including ... Is there adequateness in you?

          As for me, that the head cut that burn Grad ..
          So keep silent about the adequacy of the better if you do not understand what I wrote ..
          1. +3
            28 February 2020 14: 14
            On the contrary. All yours is extremely clear. That is why I will not say anything, not because you asked.
            1. -4
              28 February 2020 14: 17
              I always try to explain specifically and clearly ..
          2. +3
            28 February 2020 14: 29
            Quote: Roman070280
            As for me, that the head cut that burn Grad ..

            Yes, you and the slaughterhouse operator and the MLRS operator all rolled into one ...
            But there is a difference ...
            1. -4
              28 February 2020 14: 35
              The comparison was not about professional activity, or the length of a word when writing ..
          3. +2
            29 February 2020 00: 29
            Quote: Roman070280
            what heads to cut, what to burn out in hail

            Just do not confuse the military, fighting the military, and the punishers fighting the civilians.
        2. +4
          28 February 2020 14: 17
          Quote: g1washntwn
          The words forbidden by the rules are asked for your comment. This "opposition" cut heads and adolescents, including ... Is there adequateness in you?

          Georgy hi , about the adequacy and calls for it. At our place (in Syria), some PMCs cut off their heads, one for sure, though not to a teenager, and then thought of putting it on the Internet. They disgraced the Russian soldier, if only they did not speak Russian, bastards. So, everything is subjective. We have scouts, they have spies. It has always been and will be so. But on the basis of objectivity, whether we want it or not, Turkey completely repeats the actions of the Russian Federation in the Donbass. Unfortunately, in the Donbass, the Russian Federation did not bring the matter to its logical conclusion. As a result, it now has a lot of negative consequences for itself. Including in the form of economic losses (disadvantageous transit, court decisions), as well as image losses, etc. The future will show how much Turkey’s actions in this part will resemble those of the Russian Federation.
          1. +5
            28 February 2020 14: 31
            Quote: Leshy1975
            At our place (in Syria), some PMCs cut off their heads, one for sure, though not to a teenager, and then thought of putting it on the Internet. They disgraced the Russian soldier, if only they did not speak Russian, bastards.

            Share the link?
            Quote: Leshy1975
            Turkey fully repeats the actions of the Russian Federation in the Donbass

            VKS officially drenched ancient ukrov? And did the separs begin their campaign in Kiev?
            1. +4
              28 February 2020 14: 52
              Quote: Slavs
              Quote: Leshy1975
              At our place (in Syria), some PMCs cut off their heads, one for sure, though not to a teenager, and then thought of putting it on the Internet. They disgraced the Russian soldier, if only they did not speak Russian, bastards.

              Share the link?
              Quote: Leshy1975
              Turkey fully repeats the actions of the Russian Federation in the Donbass

              VKS officially drenched ancient ukrov? And did the separs begin their campaign in Kiev?

              On the first point. Just type it on the Internet: Russian PMCs cut off the head of the Syrian. You will find everything right away. I saw this video. Look, and you, if in doubt.
              On the second point. Completely repeats, I had in mind that the rationale for the operation is exactly the same and from the point of view of international laws is the same. It seems to be like a legitimate government and kind of like the sovereign territory of another state.
              The difference you are talking about is not significant. Because and Russia first had plans to deploy official troops in Ukraine. Remember how quickly senators got permission to use abroad. But then they moved on to the plan - we are not there, although even Putin has publicly confirmed that certain employees of individual departments are located in the Donbass. The only thing is that this explanation - we are not there, rolls only in the case of propaganda within the country. In foreign policy, this argument is of no interest to anyone. As well as stories that Donbass did everything himself and even got to the point that Pushilin himself chose. On this second point, dial on the Internet: negotiations between Surkov and Beard on the situation in the Donbass. Check out the recorded conversation. I listened, if not in the know, also check out.

              PS And yes, I am one of those who believe that stopping the militia (I do not consider them divisions) is a strategic mistake. And if they reached Kiev, no one would consider them divisions. And they would be power.
              1. +4
                28 February 2020 14: 59
                Quote: Leshy1975
                PS And yes, I am one of those who believe that stopping the militia (I do not consider them divisions) is a strategic mistake. And if they reached Kiev, no one would consider them divisions. And they would be power.

                But on this point, I unconditionally agree.
              2. +3
                28 February 2020 15: 38
                Regarding PMCs. The source is doubtful. There are questions to the video. There are no questions to the Tukhcharsk video. I do not recommend watching.
                https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2019/11/27/kto-zakazal-kaznit-siriyca-dezertira-po-sledam-bomby-ot-novoy-gazety
                https://rusvesna.su/news/1507575235
                Here is an alternate version. What do you want? Information war...
                Regarding Turkey-Syria and Russia-Donbass, you gave a detailed answer, but, alas, do not agree. For me, the difference is obvious. We will remain with our opinion every ...
            2. -1
              28 February 2020 22: 31
              Quote: Slavs
              Share the link?

              Here is a link to this bullshit.
              http://magspace.ru/blog/sled/308772.html
              "Strange inferences CIT and clumsy fake. The director for such work would not have received an award for sure. The actors are not convincing, the scene is a platform for collecting scrap metal, there are no landmarks on the terrain. There are some scoundrels in second-hand clothes under music they mock a beaten man lying on the ground. Not far away is someone's head, either cut off, or buried in the ground up to his neck. One can only guess ... "

              "Yes, Russian swearing is heard from time to time, but the quality of the soundtrack leaves much to be desired. Were you trying to add Russian speech to the video, but didn’t work? However, it is well known that there are enough Russian-speaking terrorists in Syria, including from Ukraine. And this moment is not worth overlooking. "
              I came across more detailed material, but did not find it straight away. "
          2. +2
            28 February 2020 22: 19
            Quote: Leshy1975
            At our place (in Syria), some PMCs cut off their heads, one for sure, though not to a teenager, and then thought of putting it on the Internet. They disgraced the Russian soldier, if only they did not speak Russian, bastards.

            http://magspace.ru/blog/sled/308772.html
            Browse the material.
            1. 0
              28 February 2020 22: 46
              Quote: Vladimir_6
              http://magspace.ru/blog/sled/308772.html

              I looked. Of course I do not want to delve into this again. I must say, those. I do not have the opportunity to analyze the video. Therefore, I can only judge by what I see. Not so simple. Firstly, these are clearly Slavs in appearance, without any accent. Therefore, all sorts of Caucasian militants disappear immediately. There is no Ukrainian accent either, but the truth is there are Ukrainians speaking almost without an accent. Secondly, other material was sent to me, from the Russian spring. Where they are based on what is possible (since it is not clearly readable) on the chevron an inscription with an error. But if people speak Russian so well, then an obvious blunder in the inscription would be immediately noticed. Most likely this is a video recording defect or what kind of damage on the chevron can simply be smeared. Thirdly about the production. In the same place they beat hands with a sapper blade (as I understand it, no longer alive) and the hand flies up from this blow. Hardly a statement. And most importantly, some of the participants as a result of the Novaya Gazeta investigation were identified. Of course, I say right away, I'm not an expert, but the faces of the identities are very similar. And here the best thing is if there was a refutation with an examination on the conformity of the persons and persons from the video indicated in the investigation. Therefore, I will say it again, not everything is so simple. hi
        3. -1
          28 February 2020 22: 19
          Justify. Where and how?
      3. +3
        28 February 2020 14: 45
        Are the Russian Armed Forces officially present in Donbas? How many "observation posts" of the Russian military are there in the DPR and LPR?
        1. +6
          28 February 2020 15: 32
          Quote: asv363
          Are Russian Armed Forces officially present in the Donbass?


          officially - no, not officially .... Secret of the open door
          1. +5
            28 February 2020 15: 43
            Quote: Silvestr
            officially no

            For this reason, it’s not worthwhile to invent an analogy between Idlib and Donbass.
          2. +2
            28 February 2020 17: 16
            Quote: Silvestr
            Quote: asv363
            Are Russian Armed Forces officially present in the Donbass?


            officially - no, not officially .... Secret of the open door

            So let the open door and lay out irrefutable evidence.
            Are they there? They are not here. So there’s nothing to talk about.
          3. 0
            29 February 2020 00: 32
            Quote: Silvestr
            Open secret

            He is refuted by the OSCE.
      4. +1
        28 February 2020 19: 09
        Quote: Roman070280
        They are there for them the same terrorists as for us-militias in the Donbass ..


        I agree partially. For the Syrians of Idlib are a completely different people who have not so much in common with Turkey. And the Turks themselves hate the Syrians for the most part. This is the main difference.

        Well, I’ll also say that 5 green lines in the video have 1 line with a black and white stripe.

        This is enough to at least not put an equal sign.
      5. -3
        28 February 2020 22: 16
        A sober assessment, it’s already warm!
    2. +2
      28 February 2020 15: 03
      Something very many are considered terrorists. From the side of the Turks, the Turkoman- related Turkic people under the yoke of the Assad regime.
    3. -1
      28 February 2020 19: 31
      all do not care, the main thing against Russia and against Assad.
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. -1
      28 February 2020 14: 08
      How can one talk about a good friend and partner?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. -3
    28 February 2020 13: 44
    It’s time for us to install the electronic warfare systems at full power and not let the Turkish UAV fly reconnaissance and target designation, or even our military can fly.
    I doubt that the Turks will miss this opportunity. It is necessary to extinguish them and force them to reconciliation. what
    1. +5
      28 February 2020 13: 55
      How will we force? It’s interesting to read your version
      1. +2
        28 February 2020 14: 10
        Will force the ministry of "concerns" laughing
        1. -1
          28 February 2020 15: 02
          This is yes, a black spot on our diplomacy. Better to be silent at all than to show "concern"
        2. -4
          28 February 2020 15: 02
          This is yes, a black spot on our diplomacy. Better to be silent at all than to show "concern"
      2. 0
        28 February 2020 14: 34
        Quote: Stalllker
        How will we force?

        Reminded of coercion 080808.
        1. -1
          28 February 2020 15: 01
          Turkey is not Georgia
          1. -1
            28 February 2020 15: 56
            Quote: Stalllker
            Turkey is not Georgia


            The Russian army of the 2008 model and the Russian army of the 2020 model are completely different armies. For 2008, the Russian army of the 2014 model and the Russian army of the 2020 model are like heaven and earth.
            1. -1
              29 February 2020 04: 42
              You compare the armies of Russia and Turkey, and what can we oppose the armies of Turkey now, if tomorrow they will once again take down our plane, God forbid of course! Walking, as it was in the Georgians, will not work
              1. 0
                29 February 2020 15: 32
                Quote: Stalllker
                and what can we now oppose the Turkish army,


                Have you seriously decided to compare a nuclear world military power with a hypersonic weapon that shares first place with the United States in terms of army power with Turkey?
        2. +1
          28 February 2020 15: 01
          Turkey is not Georgia
          1. -2
            28 February 2020 22: 20
            And not even Ukraine!))
  6. -6
    28 February 2020 13: 44
    The Foreign Minister also said that the Russian Federation brings condolences in connection with the death of the Turkish military in Idlib.

    In addition, he said that Russia asked Syria to take a break from the fighting in Idlib for the safe evacuation of the wounded.
    1. -2
      28 February 2020 14: 06
      Well, the Kremlin is not the first to wag loin in front of the enemy. And given that they delivered from 400, we build the atom for the Turks and all at the expense of Russia, such as on credit ... In the Kremlin through the looking glass the enemy is a partner .. It doesn’t matter how many Syrians have died and God will not let ours. Partners, ss.
      1. 0
        28 February 2020 14: 24
        Quote: Oleg Kolsky 051
        we build the atom for the Turks and all at the expense of Russia, such as on credit ...

        We are building all atomics on credit, here are two sides of the coin, with this loan we finance our nuclear industry, and thousands of our fellow citizens work in it.
        1. -2
          28 February 2020 15: 12
          ,, - We build all atomics on credit, here are two sides of the coin, we finance our nuclear industry with this loan, and thousands of our fellow citizens work in it, .. ****** The question is, when they do not pay on the loan, from where then the babos, if not from the bunker of the homeland? ...
          1. 0
            29 February 2020 04: 58
            Everything is different here. Read carefully about this nuclear power plant and analyze the benefits for us. Put Turkey on a gas "needle", then "electro"
      2. 0
        28 February 2020 15: 07
        The more we love a woman, the less she loves us.
      3. 0
        29 February 2020 04: 56
        I would not agree about the NPP. This is a good multi-move. Our station, electricity too. We will sell it for bucks, the price is fixed for 25 years, like, again in dollars. Even if the Turks won't buy it, there is Germany, where the green revolution is going on. There is always a place to sell. Well, and still not a little important point, why is a nuclear power plant not a "dirty atomic bomb" on the territory of a "partner" !?
  7. 0
    28 February 2020 13: 47
    And is this a massive blow? request
    1. +1
      28 February 2020 13: 49
      Dozens of pieces of equipment, hundreds of dead .. As it were, yes - they seriously took a bite ..
      1. -2
        28 February 2020 13: 51
        half a fake))) but yes SAA suffers losses, dozens of those killed every day but not hundreds as the Turks write
        1. 0
          28 February 2020 15: 07
          The Turks need to reassure their people, yesterday they even knocked out social networks so as not to aggravate the situation. Now they will show the vidosiki and they will let everything down on the brakes
      2. -1
        28 February 2020 14: 08
        Quote: Roman070280
        Dozens of pieces of equipment, hundreds of dead .. As it were, yes - they seriously took a bite ..

        Drink some water, sap, pass. Tens and hundreds ..... will heal you and them.
        1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      28 February 2020 13: 52
      they said on Turkish television, they showed a video and everything for the Turks is Edik the winner, all this is inf war
      1. 0
        29 February 2020 00: 20
        Will you continue to repeat these mantras even if the Turks stand near Damascus? Erdogan actually clearly stated his goal and stated that he was ready to pursue it with military methods. And this stated goal was not a TV show.
  8. +1
    28 February 2020 13: 50
    Putin and Edik had a telephone conversation, agreed that they could meet soon and eat ice cream
    1. 0
      28 February 2020 13: 56
      Putin and Edik had a telephone conversation "
      And who was the initiator? ..
      1. -2
        28 February 2020 14: 05
        The Turk, they say, asked for a detailed conversation. RT reported.
  9. +1
    28 February 2020 13: 51
    Pulling a tie over yourself, the main thing is not to pull the knot, otherwise you can strangle it. Along the way, Edik has less and less chance of not getting into a full-scale war. Kurds, Syria, Libya - will the Sultan pull the burden if everything comes into action?
    1. +3
      28 February 2020 16: 04
      Quote: Nyrobsky
      will the sultan pull the burden


      the Saudis in Yemen were sure that they would pull and now they regret that they were drawn in. Erdogan in his faith in the army reminds Saakashvili, who, too, believed in Western weapons and instructors that he attacked Russian peacekeepers.
      1. +1
        28 February 2020 16: 19
        Quote: lopvlad
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        will the sultan pull the burden


        the Saudis in Yemen were sure that they would pull and now they regret that they were drawn in. Erdogan in his faith in the army reminds Saakashvili, who, too, believed in Western weapons and instructors that he attacked Russian peacekeepers.

        The Saudis and Georgians had at least one hemorrhoids, and the Sultan managed to build up three. Moreover, two of them are on the Syrian theater. Having gotten stuck here, he will have to move across Libya, and therefore abandon his claims to a piece of Libyan oil pie.
        1. +1
          28 February 2020 16: 26
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Getting stuck here, he will have to move around Libya


          he has stupid, deceitful ideas. For me, he needed to concentrate on Libya and in Syria he would limit himself only to the material and military support of the barmalei. But he suddenly decided that he could fight all over the world and build a new Ottoman empire.
          1. -3
            28 February 2020 16: 44
            Quote: lopvlad
            For me, he needed to concentrate on Libya, and in Syria he would limit himself only to the material and military support of the barmalei.

            Do you stand for financing terrorist organizations?
            In general, even for appeals to this criminal article. So be careful with the statements. First we think, then we think again, and then you can write.
            1. -1
              28 February 2020 20: 50
              Quote: K-50
              Do you stand for financing terrorist organizations?
              Generally, even for appeals to this criminal article

              what I like here, that every warrant officer considers himself a lawyer.
              rooting Chukovsky there, in the jail?
  10. +5
    28 February 2020 13: 52
    I don’t understand .. And where is Syrian air defense? ..
    1. -2
      28 February 2020 13: 55
      On the sofas, capercaillie looked
    2. +5
      28 February 2020 14: 00
      In the course of the Syrians, there is a complete absence of military air defense. There is only an object
      1. +1
        28 February 2020 14: 21
        Quote: Romeo
        In the course of the Syrians, there is a complete absence of military air defense. There is only an object

        They simply did not need her. After all, the barmalei did not have aviation. They also hoped that the Russians would drive off Turkish planes from them. And here such an unexpected person - drones, and even so heaped down. And there’s nothing to shoot down ..
        There was infa that the Tiger Forces yesterday rushed to the aid of Serakibu from the south. Where, almost without fighting, the slippers were kicked out of empty villages. So now, looking at the map, which shows the attacks of the Turks on the convoys on the M-5 highway, you begin to think that this is exactly the help. Which lay down on this road and lost all its equipment. And these are also drones - good reconnaissance and target designation. It was necessary not to run through the villages, but to strengthen the defense, to dig into the ground by three meters. After all, they knew that the Turks would trample - they did not hide this.
        1. 0
          28 February 2020 16: 08
          I don’t even understand, I was thrown in a huge bunch of minuses in another branch, for what I wrote about Turkish reconnaissance drones, correcting self-propelled guns fire at the Syrians. Local "generals of the site" answered me - they were all shot down long ago. The Syrian air defense does not allow the bird to fly there. And now it turns out my words are confirmed by this article on VO and you also write about the absence of air defense in this zone. Now I finally understood - who and why mold the pluses and minuses with and without on this site. Some kind of game, not a rating.
          1. +5
            28 February 2020 16: 59
            Quote: TatarinSSSR
            I don’t understand, I’ve thrown a huge bunch of minuses in another branch

            from love to hate one step .... and back laughing
          2. -1
            29 February 2020 02: 09
            Quote: TatarinSSSR
            I don’t understand, I’ve thrown a huge bunch of minuses in another branch

            You shouldn’t be so. I rarely throw minus, and then in case I completely, fundamentally disagree with my opponent, or in my opinion, he is seriously mistaken. Yes, do not worry about the ratings and cons. I catch both. This is a discussion site where opinions can be very many, and they do not always coincide with yours.
            And he did not speak about the Syrian military air defense. Since I know that the best there is are a few Buk. But I’m not sure that they were still alive. The Syrians have less serious air defense - object. Though old, it holds well. But there is practically no support on the battlefield (or rather, cover from aviation).
        2. 0
          28 February 2020 16: 09
          Quote: Gritsa
          It was necessary not to run through the villages, but to strengthen the defense, to dig into the ground by three meters. After all, they knew that the Turks would trample - they did not hide this.


          it’s better to keep children's tips with you, they only like populists. Do not offer everyone the Wasserman vest.
      2. +3
        28 February 2020 16: 11
        What military air defense is there? There, the strike forces of the Syrian army are squads of 50-60 people with one or two tanks, a couple of old BMP-1s and several pickups with heavy machine guns. It is to the front 5-6 km. Well, behind them, somewhere one or two batteries of self-propelled guns Carnation weave far away. All.
        1. +1
          29 February 2020 02: 12
          Quote: TatarinSSSR
          Well, behind them, somewhere one or two batteries of self-propelled guns Carnation weave far away.

          Most likely not one or two batteries, but one - two units.
    3. -4
      28 February 2020 14: 01
      Israeli aircraft grazes.
    4. +1
      28 February 2020 14: 03
      Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
      I don’t understand .. And where is Syrian air defense? ..


      Apparently there isn’t in those areas, if there is any kind of anti-aircraft defense then it probably covers important goals, the same Damascus, etc. I think that the Syrians have a problem with air defense in general, they probably lack complexes ...
    5. 0
      28 February 2020 16: 11
      Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
      I don’t understand .. And where is Syrian air defense? ..


      and where is the Turkish military air defense that there are so many losses killed by the Turks, while the SAA has no attack drones?
  11. +6
    28 February 2020 14: 06
    Can drones fly in the no-fly zone? They then generally need to land without talking.
  12. +2
    28 February 2020 14: 07
    If what the Turks showed is true, then the Syrians didn’t have anything left there ... The breakthrough of the front by the Turks is a matter of several hours. Direct road to the open spaces .... Something I doubt that it is so. Everything will be clear in the coming days. to draw conclusions early. The meat grinder is gaining momentum. Until requests for a truce from Damascus are not visible.
    1. 0
      28 February 2020 14: 10
      Putin and Edik had a telephone conversation, agreed that they could meet soon and eat ice cream
      and of course the Syrians suffer, as for the technology, the Syrians have a lot of it and it is necessary to divide declared by 2
      1. -4
        28 February 2020 14: 39
        Vova apologized for the blow ... Well, yes ... we didn’t want it)
        1. 0
          28 February 2020 16: 05
          There is no such thing in the official decoding.

          Telephone conversation with President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan
          http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/62877
        2. -1
          28 February 2020 16: 13
          Quote: Dave36
          Vova apologized for the blow


          judging from the fact that Edik called then Vryatli Vova apologized for something.
      2. -2
        28 February 2020 14: 42
        Yeah and they have a lot of extra people. It's okay.
  13. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      28 February 2020 14: 43
      If kneading starts, it seems to me that the forecast for Russia is not rosy, if only because of geography
    2. +1
      28 February 2020 16: 15
      Quote from rudolf
      But if in a rush of lupanet on Turkish observation posts


      Well, such a thought in a healthy brain vryatli someone arise.
  14. +5
    28 February 2020 14: 17
    Turkish strike drones over Idlib ... It seems to be the zone of responsibility of the Russian Air Force ... A strange war request
    1. +2
      28 February 2020 16: 01
      These are not strike UAVs, these are reconnaissance for correcting the impacts of self-propelled guns T-155 Fırtına
      1. 0
        28 February 2020 20: 53
        I agree, nothing falls into the video like this, it flies from somewhere far away.
    2. +1
      28 February 2020 16: 17
      Quote: Bully
      Turkish drone drone over Idlib


      shock drones to strike a rocket unnecessarily located over the combat zone
  15. -3
    28 February 2020 14: 17
    Hmm, now it’s clear what Erdogan meant, saying that they will solve the problem of the complexity of the use of the Air Force.
    Tell someone special and correct, but according to the frames of some explosions, IMHO, UAVs can not bear such a load. I can’t be sure, but most of the time with a UAV, the target is only highlighted, and artillery and the air force delivered strikes with adjustable shells and air bombs.
    1. +2
      28 February 2020 16: 00
      Turkish UAVs really correct and highlight. Strikes are carried out using, for example, the same self-propelled guns T-155 Fırtına, modernized and quite modern. They hit with precision munitions. Turkey has not used its air force for strikes apparently yet.
  16. -8
    28 February 2020 14: 22
    Russia needs to leave Syria. On the outskirts you need to restore order ...
    1. -4
      28 February 2020 14: 41
      I don’t think ... On the outskirts soon the bare steppe will remain and the poor population. Sense to invest in the outskirts? To be betrayed, once again? ..
      1. -2
        28 February 2020 14: 45
        bare steppe is already almost all of Russia, but not naked in Syria?) What does Russia gain by spending a lot of money and resources? Let the Turks at least get to Georgia violet, so you see Georgia will enter the EU
    2. -2
      28 February 2020 15: 20
      Nobody needs aggravation there.
    3. -1
      28 February 2020 16: 20
      Quote: Bicyclist
      Russia needs to leave Syria


      Do you want to fight with militants on the territory of Russia?. We have already left Afghanistan and, as a result, have received drug addiction of the Russian population.
  17. +2
    28 February 2020 14: 29
    Quote: K-50
    It’s time for us to install the electronic warfare onboard power at full power and not to let the Turkish UAV fly

    It's like: Press the big red button that says "FULL POWER"? ))))) and all the UAVs fall? )))
    1. 0
      28 February 2020 20: 57
      Quote: behappy
      and all UAVs get there? )))

      flare up with a bright flame, and the operator joystick shocks so much that all the insides are soft-boiled.
      we have such a reb, you won’t get spoiled.
  18. +4
    28 February 2020 14: 31
    -Yes .... -A few more of these attacks on the Assad’s SAA and the Syrians will just scatter somewhere ...
    1. 0
      28 February 2020 14: 40
      One hundred percent..
  19. -1
    28 February 2020 14: 38
    Impressive accuracy ..
  20. +1
    28 February 2020 14: 53
    And where is the air defense that even knocks down a sparrow? If this continues, then in a "week" there will again be battles near Damascus.
    1. -3
      28 February 2020 14: 54
      yeah. near Moscow
      1. +6
        28 February 2020 14: 57
        Remark from Poddubny: And now a little more emotional. Turkish specialists are not seven spans in the forehead, act on textbooks. Sometimes extremely clumsy and frankly unprofessional. React slowly, even slower than APU for example. In short, such a beautifully packaged army hasn’t fought for a long time. Syrian guys heroically endure artillery raids, they die, they are angry, but everyone looks at the shovel as a damned and even dangerous thing. The only thing they have enough strength for is to fill the shaft around the position. Which, as you know, does not save from art. They stand and perish, perish and stand. Sorry for the guys. And even commanders have nothing to do with it. Just such a feature ...

        Boris writes: On the development of the crisis around Idlib.


        1. Putin and Erdogan had a telephone conversation about what was happening. The call was initiated by "Recep's friend".
        2. Lavrov today officially expressed condolences to Turkey in connection with the death of the Turkish military and said that Russia adheres to the Sochi agreements, but there can be no compromise with terrorists. Also, Russia does not believe that the NATO charter applies in any way to the situation in Idlib.
        3. Judging by the statements of Turkish media and officials, the discussion within NATO will revolve around point 4. Despite the condemnation of Russia and Syria, NATO so far basically requires just stopping the offensive and de-escalating.
        4. The UN and EU structures are calling for de-escalation and the inadmissibility of pushing events into scenarios that could lead to a major international military conflict.
        5. In the assessment of the circumstances of the strike, the parties diverged - Russia insists that after the strike on the Turks, the fire was stopped and assistance was provided for the evacuation of the wounded. The Turks insist that after hitting the military, the attacks continued after the arrival of ambulances.
        6. All contacts on military and diplomatic lines between Moscow and Ankara remain. Both in the framework of consultations on the subject of what is happening, and in the framework of the routine work of de-escalation mechanisms.
        7. Noteworthy is the underlined calm position of Iran, which did not make any high-profile statements on the situation, although Tehran is, along with Russia, Assad's main ally.

        What can be noted.
        In the morning, they did not declare war on Syria and officially declared martial law, although they promised (some Turkish MPs are already urging the government to either act or resign). Turkey actually took a respite until the completion of consultations with NATO.
        Russia makes it clear that it is not seeking a direct military confrontation with Turkey, but at the same time it is pushing the point that the attack on terrorists should continue.
        All this puts Erdogan in a very difficult position, especially since in addition to Syria, bad news comes from Libya - yesterday from 7 to 10 Turkish soldiers died there, and today Haftar's troops fired up to 50 missiles at Mitiga airport, aiming at Turkish infrastructure - positions Air defense missile system "Hawk", barracks, ammunition depot and hangar for UAVs. Erdogan, in fact, has driven himself into an extremely narrow space of decisions, where he must either raise rates or look for opportunities to jump out of extremely dangerous scenarios.
        The fighting in Idlib nonetheless continues - both in the Sarakib area and north of the Al-Ghab Plain.
        1. 0
          28 February 2020 15: 06
          you have very correctly and intelligibly painted, 50+ to you
        2. +2
          28 February 2020 18: 19
          If I understand you correctly. "Friend Recep" lathered up to fight on two fronts? Money from tourists is not enough for him?
  21. -2
    28 February 2020 15: 11
    Assad and the Alawite minority in Syria are very stubborn and stubborn warriors, France taught them that.
    Yes, if it were not for them, and the socialist ideology of the Ba'ath party, then they would have worked with the USSR and had gingerbread.

    But damn, having a mind in your head on your shoulders, obliges every soldier, why the hell should they climb with weapons to the territory of Sunnis armed with Turkey?

    Do you want to rule Syria - please, but why so rude? As for me, if we conduct military operations, then given the fact that the smallest number of people will be lost. Who needs land without people living on it? Own Alavite ego and his associates?
  22. -5
    28 February 2020 15: 16
    Yes, Erdogan Putin in Syria framed powerfully .. Whisper something or swear today by phone ..
    1. 0
      28 February 2020 15: 29
      all is well, do not worry
  23. -2
    28 February 2020 15: 24
    But what if the Turks give out a video with night shooting where the equipment for their own is destroyed, and it is removed by the SAA and the Turkish equipment is destroyed.
    1. 0
      28 February 2020 20: 59
      , they stole a smartphone from Suheil and from there they wiped rollers.
  24. -2
    28 February 2020 15: 28
    Quote: Mik1701
    The question is when the loan is not paid,

    Who does not pay? So far, only Lukashenko has problems in this regard.
  25. +7
    28 February 2020 15: 46
    This video is just for those hooray crackers who are here on VO. I think they now scratch their turnips and understand that not only Russian troops can wet tanks and artillery. And other countries have weapons and various systems. In a few hours, the Turks halved all Syrian strike groups near Idlib. And moreover, they beat it very accurately. If the Turks are not stopped, in a week there will be nothing left from the tanks and artillery of the Assad Syrian army.
    1. 0
      29 February 2020 19: 22
      Quote: TatarinSSSR
      This video is just for those hooray crackers who settled here in VO. I think they now scratch their turnips and understandthat not only Russian troops can wet tanks and artillery. And other countries have weapons and various systems. Turks in a few hours all Syrian strike groups near Idlib were halved. And moreover, they beat it very accurately. If the Turks are not stopped, nothing will be left from Assad’s tanks and artillery in a week.

      ===
      February 16, 20th registered, and no longer in the eyebrow, but in the eye! amazing insight)
  26. +4
    28 February 2020 16: 20
    I will not go on vacation to Turkey
    1. 0
      28 February 2020 17: 38
      Quote: Nikolay87
      I will not go on vacation to Turkey


      And all this time - went, you need to understand?
    2. -3
      28 February 2020 21: 00
      with such an avatar you have to go, and right by the age of one you’ve been a bachelor for a visit.
  27. +3
    28 February 2020 17: 14
    Quote: TatarinSSSR
    Turkish UAVs really correct and highlight. Strikes are carried out using, for example, the same self-propelled guns T-155 Fırtına, modernized and quite modern. They hit with precision munitions. Turkey has not used its air force for strikes apparently yet.

    He looked at Turkish canals, artillery shells and aerial bombs. But mostly artillery.
    1. +1
      1 March 2020 21: 36
      From February 29, the Turks began to use drone UAVs and F-16 multipurpose fighters. Although it seems like everyone everywhere said that the airspace of Syria is closed to the Turks with the help of the Russian Aerospace Forces.
  28. 0
    28 February 2020 18: 40
    https://vk.com/video-55849790_456245812 https://vk.com/video-123538639_456258295 https://vk.com/video-55849790_456245791 https://vk.com/video-55849790_456245780 https://vk.com/video-123538639_456258241 Туркам и самим ответка прилетела
  29. +2
    28 February 2020 19: 09
    If this is true, then at our headquarters in Syria someone will not respond very frailly! Where are our electronic warfare, where is the support of the offensive by air defense systems, shells, tori .... Why aren’t artillery and accumulation of equipment covered? Or was nobody expecting this? After the initial success in the offensive against the militants, a Turkish strike was expected, and the non-travelers are not such an unexpected option given their continued use in Syria ...
    1. 0
      28 February 2020 21: 01
      Quote: Alexey G
      Where are our electronic warfare, where is the support of the offensive by air defense systems, shells, tori

      Turks say minus one shell and one beech
      1. 0
        28 February 2020 23: 06
        Say, is that all that covered the M5? Not a little?
        And why could they be destroyed?
    2. +2
      1 March 2020 21: 49
      EWs were useless against Turkish UAVs Bayraktar TB2. All control of this shock drone was carried out in the C-band (range), which could not be detected and suppressed by electronic warfare, + duplication of coordinates on the UHF channel (correction). Therefore, like electronic warfare was used, but it did not give any sense. For an UAV of this class, a slightly different approach is needed in addition to suppressing GPS signals.
      1. -1
        2 March 2020 22: 44
        It seems to me for our EW S-Band or something else is not important! Kraukha makes blunt more serious devices, and not Turkish assholes!
        1. -1
          3 March 2020 20: 43
          I'm afraid you're a little off topic. Or strongly believe everything that is written about Russian weapons in the yellow media
          1. -1
            3 March 2020 22: 09
            And excuse me, from what sources do you know about our secret weapon? About which the American generals speak so unpleasantly ... that it prevents them from working on Syria.
            1. 0
              3 March 2020 23: 23
              Tell me at least one state that has been prevented by Russian EW from bombing Syria? laughing
              1. -1
                4 March 2020 17: 11
                Americans and Israelis were disturbed! There are some facts that speak of this!
  30. 0
    28 February 2020 21: 03
    Quote: protoss
    , they stole a smartphone from Suheil and from there they wiped rollers.

    And after such a crushing blow, they ran to the carpet to Putin? Turks blocked YouTube and Vatsar with a tweeter?
  31. +1
    28 February 2020 21: 09
    Quote: Dave36
    Vova apologized for the blow ... Well, yes ... we didn’t want it)

    Well, yes ... this is not us ... And you were supposed to be at your "observation posts (delimiting nusra and" opposition ") posts ... We condole, but you yourself have nourished ...
  32. 0
    28 February 2020 21: 45
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Accurate anti-tank missiles from shock drones.

    For the sake of Israel, the owners of Israel will not allow a world war ...
  33. 0
    28 February 2020 21: 47
    Quote: Roman070280
    As Bismarck said, most of all lie in the elections, in hunting and in war.

    Well, here it’s like not empty words, but real shots .. It’s not easy to refute them ..

    With a video game playstation?
  34. +2
    29 February 2020 19: 24
    Everything, damn it, absolutely all the familiar men and, probably, strangers think that only we have modern shells and rockets, and we will roll anyone in half a day. And now compare our and Turkish video .... What kind of allies are we? They apologized and watched as the Syrians were shot. A disgrace. To the whole world.
    1. 0
      29 February 2020 19: 34
      Quote: helilelik
      A disgrace. To the whole world

      Congratulations on your first comment, for three years on the site. Comment, however, is not the best, but I hope you correct it.
      1. +1
        29 February 2020 20: 51
        Did you dislike the drama or the syllable?
        1. -1
          29 February 2020 20: 59
          Quote: helilelik
          Did you dislike the drama or the syllable?

          I liked the fact that you were silent for three years. Like that boy from the story about burnt porridge.
          1. +1
            29 February 2020 21: 06
            Well, sorry. Just read, the site is interesting.
  35. -1
    1 March 2020 08: 17
    As someone wrote .. here you have NATO at the minimum .. they hit the bull's-eye! Look at similar shots from the Russian side))) Pro.sra.la Russia all with Gorbachev !! If now the war will be like in Yugoslavia. The only deterrent is yao.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"