The Central Military District spoke about plans for re-equipment from S-300 air defense systems to the Vityaz air defense system S-350

The Central Military District spoke about plans for re-equipment from S-300 air defense systems to the Vityaz air defense system S-350

The Central Military District begins the planned rearmament of anti-aircraft missile units, which are armed with the S-300 air defense system. This was stated by the commander of the district’s troops, Alexander Lapin.


According to the colonel general, according to the district’s plans, one anti-aircraft missile brigade from Khakassia and one anti-aircraft missile regiment in the Krasnoyarsk Territory will be re-equipped with the latest S-350 Vityaz anti-aircraft complex. The re-equipment will be carried out in stages, by 2022 the brigade will be re-equipped, the regiment will receive a new complex by 2025.

(...) starting in 2021, we are starting the rearmament of the anti-aircraft missile brigade, which is deployed in the Republic of Khakassia, from S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to the latest S-350 Vityaz anti-aircraft missile system. We plan to complete the rearmament in 2022. Next, we will continue until 2025. rearm one more anti-aircraft missile regiment stationed in Achinsk

- said Lapin.

The S-350 Vityaz air defense system is a medium-range complex used to organize air defense of important administrative or military targets against air strikes of various means. It is focused on the creation of multi-stage protection, ensuring the safety of the airspace of the state. SAM can hit manned Aviation (aircraft, helicopters), drones, as well as cruise and ballistic missiles. In addition, it is able to prevent impacts from low-flying objects. The complex is designed to replace the troops S-300PS and Buk-M1-2.

SAM "Vityaz" is able to work in automatic mode, in which the calculation ensures the deployment of air defense systems and control over the actions of the system. The maximum number of simultaneously hit aerodynamic targets - 16, ballistic - 12. The maximum range of destruction - 60 km, height - 30 km. The deployment time of the system in the combat position - 5 minutes.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The leader of the Redskins 27 February 2020 15: 25 New
    • 8
    • 4
    +4
    Undoubtedly good news for today!
    1. Sky strike fighter 27 February 2020 16: 01 New
      • 9
      • 1
      +8
      The news is good, but why do some media artificially castrate the S-350?
      The maximum range of defeat is 60 km, height - 30 km. The deployment time of the system in a combat position is 5 minutes.

      Not really. The S-350 has both short and medium-range missiles. (9M96D).
      The system can destroy air targets at ranges of more than 120 kilometers and at altitudes of more than 30 kilometers. The complex is put on alert within five minutes.
      Ammunition includes medium-range missiles used in the S-400 air defense system and short-range missiles.

      https://ria.ru/20200226/1565224444.html
      1. Ros 56 27 February 2020 18: 10 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        This is so that the opponent is new.
        1. bayard 28 February 2020 01: 27 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          This is from the incompetence of journalists. In the old days, you had to first become an expert in a business, and then write about it ... Now victims of the exam are writing, who are just too lazy to look at what they write about.
  2. NEXUS 27 February 2020 15: 25 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    Finally, they were born ... Vityaz was tortured for a long time.
    1. 1976AG 27 February 2020 15: 28 New
      • 6
      • 14
      -8
      With such a pace of rearmament ... that he is, that he is not
      1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 15: 30 New
        • 18
        • 6
        +12
        With such a pace of rearmament ... that he is, that he is not

        By 2020, they planned 56 S-400 divisions and purchased 65 divisions
        with the S-350 air defense system, perhaps the same thing will happen,
        the faster we buy for ourselves, the higher the export potential
        the more useless A2 / AD zones will be in the world for the US Air Force and NATO
        1. NEXUS 27 February 2020 15: 39 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          the faster we buy for ourselves, the higher the export potential

          I do not think that in the near future Vityaz will go for export, since there is an export version of BUK-M3 (Viking) and it is he who is a direct competitor to Vityaz ...
          1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 15: 43 New
            • 16
            • 1
            +15
            The Buk-M3 is a military air defense, and the S-350 is an object with long radar life
            those. Beech does not protect troops for a long time, only during the threatened period, receiving command from third-party radars such as Sky or through automated control systems.
            The S-350 is constantly on combat duty for 10 hours (this is the radar’s refusal), replacing one division with another. And it can also be paired with radars such as Sky, etc. as well as with ACS.
            1. NEXUS 27 February 2020 15: 46 New
              • 2
              • 4
              -2
              Quote: Romario_Argo
              The Buk-M3 is a military air defense, and the S-350 is an object with long radar life
              those. The beech does not protect the troops for a long time, only in the threatened period, receiving command from third-party sky-type radars
              The S-350 constantly carries combat duty for 10 hours (this is the radar’s failure), replacing 000 division with another

              What prevents the Viking from defending object targets? At the same time, the price of the comparative issue is important, and here, I think, the comparison is not in Vityaz’s favor in the issue of export purchases.
              Therefore, I believe that buyers will rather take the Viking.
              1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 15: 52 New
                • 7
                • 1
                +6
                Viking air defense systems have radars with shorter standby time, unlike 50N6 S-350 Vityaz radars
                but I think that the S-350 and BC are higher
                1. 1976AG 27 February 2020 15: 54 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Viking is an export version
                2. NEXUS 27 February 2020 15: 57 New
                  • 3
                  • 1
                  +2
                  Quote: Romario_Argo
                  Viking air defense systems have radars with shorter standby time, unlike 50N6 S-350 Vityaz radars
                  but I think that the S-350 and BC are higher

                  I think you're right, but ... on the part of the buyer who wants to take cheaper and more, while not losing much in the quality of the product, a Viking is still preferable. For example, China, I think it will want to take Vityaz “for trial,” but some Serbia will probably take a Viking.
                  1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 16: 01 New
                    • 3
                    • 1
                    +2
                    Viking aka Buk-M3 has great survivability in front of the IOS, therefore it is preferable for troops
                    Serbia, as an option, may approach the S-350 instead of the S-400 so as not to quarrel with NATO regarding the smaller A2AD zone. But we do not sell them yet. Maybe sometime later after the ZRPK Shell and S-400. laughing
                  2. bayard 28 February 2020 01: 39 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: NEXUS
                    but ... on the part of the buyer who wants to take cheaper and more, while not losing much in the quality of the product, a Viking is still preferable.

                    The Buk-3 has a tracked chassis and a rotary launcher with start at an angle. This is more expensive than the chassis of the S-350, and technically more difficult, because with a vertical start, you do not need to deploy a launcher. Again transportation - the S-350 moves independently - on its own chassis, and the Buk-3 requires a trailer. But the “Buk-3” on the road next to the tanks, on the march will cover, at any site will unfold. The wheeled chassis has more restrictions, but the air defense system has it.
          2. venik 27 February 2020 16: 32 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: NEXUS
            I do not think that in the near future Vityaz will go for export

            ======
            The main thing is that I would go to the troops !!! And there already - let's figure it out!
        2. 1976AG 27 February 2020 15: 48 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Well, if so, but even if by 2025 not one but two regiments rearm, nothing will change in principle, but we need a lot
          1. bayard 28 February 2020 01: 45 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: 1976AG
            Well, if so, but even if, by 2025, not one but two regiments will essentially rearm nothing

            What are you talking about ?
            Look at the schedule for the supply of S-400 to the troops. And this is not counting exports. If the S-350 will be delivered at the same pace (the complex is smaller, cheaper, less labor intensive), each year the troops will replenish 3-4 regiment sets (up to 6 in the future). And this is taking into account the three-division regiments. But now the fashion for 2 division regiments has gone. Looks not from a good life. Perhaps they will understaff later when the mod for the light version ends.
        3. Technologist 27 February 2020 15: 54 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Do not tell who will give the order to shoot down NATO planes ???
          1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 15: 56 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Who will give the order to shoot down NATO aircraft?

            more useless A2 / AD zones will be in the world for US Air Force and NATO

            as an option, limit the penguins in a free movement where and when they want
            1. Technologist 27 February 2020 15: 59 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              So in Syria they wanted to sneeze at all, but we only blah blah, express concern.
              1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 16: 02 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                it’s better to find out from GENES
              2. The comment was deleted.
        4. 1976AG 27 February 2020 17: 41 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          With such a pace of rearmament ... that he is, that he is not

          By 2020, they planned 56 S-400 divisions and purchased 65 divisions
          with the S-350 air defense system, perhaps the same thing will happen,
          the faster we buy for ourselves, the higher the export potential
          the more useless A2 / AD zones will be in the world for the US Air Force and NATO

          What kind of export are you worried about? We would provide ourselves.
          1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 18: 07 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            What kind of export are you worried about?

            you just don't read:
            the more useless A2 / AD zones will be in the world for the US Air Force and NATO
            We would provide ourselves

            2 plants produce S-400 air defense systems, both are gradually possible and will continue to increase S-350 volumes
            1. 1976AG 27 February 2020 19: 30 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              "gradually it is possible and we will increase volumes on S-350"

              But for the next 5 years! such a scenario is not planned.

              "you just don't read:
              the more useless A2 / AD zones will be in the world for the US Air Force and NATO "

              I’m reading, I’m just not worried about access zones for NATO in other regions of the planet. We ourselves are not yet adequately protected.
              1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 19: 37 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                We ourselves are not yet adequately protected.

                and if in the complex to look at the country's air defense?
                SPRN, ZRLS, fighter aircraft, military air defense, object air defense, missile defense of Moscow - and all this is combined into a single command center for decision-making (!)
                1. 1976AG 27 February 2020 19: 45 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Romario_Argo
                  We ourselves are not yet adequately protected.

                  and if in the complex to look at the country's air defense?
                  SPRN, ZRLS, fighter aircraft, military air defense, object air defense, missile defense of Moscow - and all this is combined into a single command center for decision-making (!)

                  And if you look at the scale of the threats in a complex? Their quantitative and qualitative components? Everything is far from so rosy.
                  1. bayard 28 February 2020 01: 58 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    If you equate with Soviet air defense, then of course yes. But in the coming years no one S-350 will not give for export - everyone will go to the troops. Until there is a relative saturation of its air defense and until industry sways in mass production. In this decade, air defense will be saturated with the S-350 and S-500. Export deliveries will begin on the strength of the year in 4.
                    1. Romario_Argo 28 February 2020 11: 18 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      If equal to the Soviet air defense

                      and what about Soviet air defense, then the radius of the radar and missile systems was less, the intercept speed
                      I agree. in that the saturation was greater in C-75, C-125
                      S-300 practically remained in the same quantity at the same positions
                      I only had to patch holes in connection with the release of several SSR
                      1. bayard 28 February 2020 18: 20 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Quote: Romario_Argo
                        and what about Soviet air defense, then the radius of the radar and missile systems was less, the intercept speed
                        I agree. in that the saturation was greater in C-75, C-125

                        You forgot about the S-200, their range will not be inferior to the modern S-400 (up to 320 km), although it is a bulky complex, but power. In Soviet times, in Azerbaijan alone, we had two air defense missile systems, an air defense system, an MiG-25 regiment and a radio engineering brigade. And after all, regiments and brigades were not a couple of the current - full-fledged.
                      2. Romario_Argo 28 February 2020 18: 34 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        I agree.
                        forgot about the S-200, he still keeps Israeli pilots at bay
                        they try not to cross the zone so to speak no return i.e. when there is not enough time for the fighter to leave the missile defense system or to go undercover into its own air defense zone
                2. Romario_Argo 28 February 2020 11: 15 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Mobile S-500 missile defense systems in the amount of up to 10 divisions until 2025 are still on the way
                  I already thought about 2 years ago on VO in the comments,
                  approximately on IOS threats 8
                  and 20 missiles i.e. 000-fold overlap SVN
                  now even higher resistance, you need to consider
                  Su-35 and Su-30 became larger, MiG-35 launched in a series
      2. Tusv 27 February 2020 20: 05 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Romario_Argo
        the more useless A2 / AD zones will be in the world for the US Air Force and NATO

        A2 / AD - There are two in Hell for the adversary
        The higher the military budgets of NATO, the less social networks, the more protests. Wow, I gloat over the collapse of the USSR
    2. venik 27 February 2020 16: 30 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Quote: 1976AG
      With such a pace of rearmament ... that he is, that he is not

      ========
      The main thing is what IS !!!
      1. 1976AG 27 February 2020 17: 13 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        Quote: venik
        Quote: 1976AG
        With such a pace of rearmament ... that he is, that he is not

        ========
        The main thing is what IS !!!

        No dear. A single instance of the weather does not. According to the GOZ 2011-2020, 28 S-400 regiments were put into the troops, and here in 5 years there is one brigade and one regiment! But the S-350 is not as powerful as the S-400. For our territory and given the large number of "well-wishers" this is not even a drop in the bucket ...
  3. venik 27 February 2020 16: 28 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: NEXUS
    Finally, they were born ... Vityaz was tortured for a long time.

    ========
    There the problem was with the element base. We were counting on the "western" ..., and here - the sanctions came in .... The delay turned out ... But - they created their OWN! Maybe it's for the best !!!
  4. Tusv 27 February 2020 19: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: NEXUS
    Finally, they were born ... Vityaz was tortured for a long time.

    The news is doubly good. The hero is a very serious thing. It was originally planned to stamp on the South Korean element base. Hence the five-year shift to the right.
  • Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 15: 32 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Everything is going as planned. The revolutionary can go fast, and the rest is planned. This is a serious thing, we are not on the Maidan?
    1. 1976AG 27 February 2020 17: 49 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
      Everything is going as planned. The revolutionary can go fast, and the rest is planned. This is a serious thing, we are not on the Maidan?

      That’s how it all goes OUTSIDE. If according to plans, then he should have appeared several years ago, and now it seems to have appeared, but mass deliveries are not expected.
      1. Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 18: 09 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Want faster? Flag you hands. But nothing depends on you, as well as on me.
        1. 1976AG 27 February 2020 19: 32 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
          Want faster? Flag you hands. But nothing depends on you, as well as on me.

          You do not understand the meaning of what I wrote, but comment.
          1. Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 19: 54 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Sorry if so.
  • paul3390 27 February 2020 15: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is interesting - why is it that they first re-equip Khakassia and Krasnoyarsk with the latest technology? It seems like not the most threatened regions - would it be more logical to drive west first?
    1. Sky strike fighter 27 February 2020 16: 09 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      It is planned to replace the old S-300PS located there with the new S-350. The country is large. Now it’s the turn to re-equip Khakassia and Krasnoyarsk. In the west in the Leningrad Region, the S-350 was put into service. Yes, it’s not so critical, the S-400 is in the western direction enough.
      1. paul3390 27 February 2020 16: 17 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        As I understand it - the S350 is by no means an analogue of the S-400. Designed just for wandered at medium distances that did not fail S-400. That is - it goes as an addition in layered defense. And the main adversaries - they are in fact in the West are grouped ..
        1. Sky strike fighter 27 February 2020 16: 56 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: paul3390
          As I understand it - the S350 is by no means an analogue of the S-400. Designed just for wandered at medium distances that did not fail S-400. That is - it goes as an addition in layered defense. And the main adversaries - they are in fact in the West are grouped ..

          S-350 is an analogue of Patriot PAC-3, i.e. medium-range air defense systems. However, the same medium-range missiles 9M96D can use both S-350 and S-400. At the same time, S-350 can also use short-range missiles, and S-400 They can also use long-range missiles. The S-400 also has a missile for intercepting BRs with an interception ceiling of about 200 km in height and a range of about 400 km, with this S-400 missile is an analogue of the American THAAD. That is, the S-350, depending on the ammunition load, can perform the functions of short-range and medium-range air defense systems, and the S-400, the functions of medium-range, long-range air defense systems.
    2. Samaritan 27 February 2020 16: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In the West already S-400 Triumph
    3. Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 18: 13 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Maybe due to the fact that Khakassia and Krasnoyarsk are the most difficult to get?
      1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 19: 06 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Maybe due to the fact that Khakassia and Krasnoyarsk are the most difficult to get?

        or maybe due to the fact that there are all sorts of state district power stations, closed cities and other secret and regime
        1. Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 20: 37 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          He's called us. You are not at all in the subject, you have never been here and you would have gone from here.
          1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 20: 45 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            what do you smoke loose shag laughing
            Krasnoyarsk state district power station - 1260 MW + Krasnoyarsk state district power station - 12x500 MW
            ZATO Zheleznogorsk, ZATO Zelenogorsk, CrAM metallurgical, if the BZHRK will revive then the 36th missile division will revive
            here and cover them from the IOS
            1. Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 21: 00 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Yes, we have a hydroelectric power station called. That's just hes. And she is in Divnogorsk. Tell me something else.
  • Antidote 27 February 2020 16: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What is there with 9M100, like with 40N6? The complex will be without a rocket for him?
    1. Sky strike fighter 27 February 2020 17: 18 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      State tests completed successfully.
      In Russia, the state tests of the Poliment-Redoubt anti-aircraft missile system for frigates of project 22350 were completed.


      Polyment-Redut is an anti-aircraft missile system with a vertical launch installation for the Russian Navy. Able to hit targets in a wide range of distances with missiles of various types. The complex will receive three types of missiles of different ranges, unified with the S-350 Vityaz missiles, the ammunition of which includes both medium-range missiles used in the S-400 air defense system and short-range ones. So, fire can be fired by medium and long-range missiles of the 9M96 family, as well as 9M100 melee missiles.

      https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/117084/
      40N6M also passed state tests.
  • Russian_man 27 February 2020 16: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    would rather ..
  • rocket757 27 February 2020 16: 42 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    But this is cool!
    Good systems are being replaced with new, better!
    That’s why they don’t fly, nobody will even risk checking!
    1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 19: 09 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      what’s the air defense motto: we don’t fly and don’t give others
      1. rocket757 27 February 2020 19: 14 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        But they always looked at the sky with great interest!
        1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 19: 24 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          for example: on February 15, 4 S-400 divisions were put under Peter, these are 128 TsU and BK channels for launch in 128 missiles for only this 1th Regiment.
          The idea is that after 5 years, the S-400 may completely switch to 40N6 missiles with a range of 400 km.,
          and the S-350 can deliver the 3rd division of medium range up to 150 km.
          1. rocket757 27 February 2020 19: 47 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            This is normal, the sky is under control, the borders are under lock and key.
  • jeka424 27 February 2020 21: 18 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    A. To replace which c300 they are different with c300 n and c300 in