“They didn’t catch it”: NATO fighters could not find the Russian Tu-95

48
“They didn’t catch it”: NATO fighters could not find the Russian Tu-95

A curious incident occurred on February 26 this year over the Norwegian Sea. Aviation NATO tried to find in this area the Russian Tu-95, which made a scheduled flight, but in the end "was left with nothing."

According to Avialive, on February 26, having received an alarm signal about the discovery of the Russian strategic Tu-95 bomber over the Norwegian Sea, five NATO fighters and a tanker were lifted into the air, which went to the area of ​​the alleged discovery of the Russian aircraft for its identification and further escort.



It is reported that two British Typhoon fighters from the Lossimuth air base and an Airbus Voyager tanker from Bryz-Norton were sent to intercept the Russian aircraft. In addition, two Norwegian F-16 fighters from the Bodo air base and the Dutch F-15 were lifted into the air.

NATO fighters carried out a long search for the Russian Tu-95, but as a result, and without having found it, all the fighters returned to their airfields.

Meanwhile, the Russian Ministry of Defense stated that there was no Tu-95 in that area, and two Tu-142 anti-submarine aircraft made a planned flight over the neutral waters of the Barents and Norwegian Seas. It turns out, "not that caught."

The crews of the aircraft have worked out the skills of following a given course over a non-reference area, the coordination of piloting in the absence of ground-based radio-technical navigation aids. The flight lasted about 12 hours, the planes returned safely to the airfield.

Tu-95 aircraft in this area did not perform

- said the press service of the North fleet.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    February 27 2020
    Do you see the Tu95 there? Not? And he is there.
    1. +32
      February 27 2020
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      Do you see the Tu95 there? Not? And he is there.

      Tu-142 is just a modification of the Tu-95. But the fact that they were not found, already says a lot.
      1. +2
        February 27 2020
        Yes, they just have "unparalleled in the world" generators of cover fields laughing Or NATO fighters have forgotten how to catch mice.
        1. +2
          February 27 2020
          Quote: Sergey39
          Yes, they just have "unparalleled in the world" generators of cover fields laughing Or NATO fighters have forgotten how to catch mice.

          The second is more likely.
        2. +5
          February 27 2020
          Quote: Sergey39
          NATO fighters have forgotten how to catch mice.

          What a comedic story looms. The object was not found, well at least they themselves did not get lost. In addition, TU-95, this is not a needle in a haystack, with modern means of detection.
      2. +25
        February 27 2020
        laughing That's really stealth bombers, where is the B-2 spirit.
      3. +8
        February 27 2020
        We looked the wrong way ...
        1. +8
          February 27 2020
          Tu-142 is the largest. Not small. Big. To hide this is a great talent. Respect and respect to flyers
        2. 0
          February 29 2020
          Quote: knn54
          We looked the wrong way ...

          I remembered how now, in the distant seventies, one of our ensigns bought cigarettes in a store, either Tu-134 or Tu-154:
          - For me, please, a pack of "Tu".
          - Which one? This one?
          -No, "Tu"!
      4. +4
        February 27 2020
        Quote: neri73-r
        Tu-142 is just a modification of the Tu-95.

        More precisely, the Tu-142 was made on the basis of the Tu-95RC.
        But the story did not end there - and already on the basis of the modified Tu-142, our current strategic missile carrier, the Tu-95MS, was made the main one. smile
      5. 0
        February 28 2020
        Quote: neri73-r
        Tu-142 is just a modification of the Tu-95. But the fact that they were not found, already says a lot.

        It is possible that they discovered the Tu-142. (Well, I do not believe that such a goal, which visually, without locators can be seen for a hundred kilometers, they did not detect). But, the fact is that they were then sent specifically to look for the Tu-95, which, of course, they did not find, since it was not there.
    2. +3
      February 27 2020
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      Do you see the Tu95 there? Not? And he is there.

      ======
      Is this an anecdote "about a gopher"? good drinks
      Exactly - "in the subject"! Directly "removed from the tongue"! fellow
    3. +4
      February 27 2020
      Actually, the editorial office needs to remember / know that today is not April 1st.
      From the article:
      “As Avialive writes, February 26th, receiving a signal ...”
      I decided to ask Google about Avialive, and Google asks me what I mean:
      Did you mean:
      Avayalive Availive Avaya Live Av Alive
      those. there is no such site, but there are many such names on twitter and instagram.
      The editors have fun / fooling around - they told a joke and read the reaction of the patriots. It is not good to giggle ... !!
      1. +1
        February 28 2020
        It’s good that 5 Air Force planes returned to the base, otherwise it would have happened like in Bermuda with 5 US torpedo bombers, flew out and disappeared in clear weather. Well, we didn’t have to look for ourselves smile
      2. +1
        February 28 2020
        How strange you are. For individual vessels, Twitter comments are already proof.
        Here we play, here we play again, but here we do not play because I wrapped the fish here?
  2. +1
    February 27 2020
    Lounged
  3. +8
    February 27 2020
    A few days later the gene. sec NATO Stoltenberg will accuse the Russian Federation of violating the Negotiation of not introducing stealth technologies in old bombers. wink
    PS: Not bad, so they burned fuel
    1. +5
      February 27 2020
      Quote: Kurare
      A few days later the gene. sec NATO Stoltenberg will accuse the Russian Federation of ...
      no matter what, he has such a job.
      Question to the author
      A curious incident occurred on February 26 ... and the Dutch F-15
      where are the firewood from?
      1. +3
        February 27 2020
        where are the firewood from?


        https://rg.ru/2020/02/26/reg-szfo/minoborony-rf-nazvalo-samolety-uskolznuvshie-ot-istrebitelej-nato.html

        https://www.airlive.net/breaking-raf-typhoon-fighter-jets-scrambled-after-a-russian-tu-95-has-been-spotted-west-of-norway/
      2. +2
        February 27 2020
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        Question to the author
        A curious incident occurred on February 26 ... and the Dutch F-15
        where are the firewood from?

        Yes, I was also surprised where the Dutch got their F-15s from.
        1. +3
          February 27 2020
          There, in the original source, only about the 16th is said, although it is clear that the article was edited, so maybe they had a little
          1. +2
            February 27 2020
            Quote: pipetro
            There, in the original source, only the 16ths are said ...

            Then, we will send to the category "Blackfire". hi
            1. +4
              February 27 2020
              So let's write
              Quote: Kurare
              in the category about hi

              Everyone completed the task, not all successfully
  4. +3
    February 27 2020
    Broke off ... but spent the fuel ... wink
  5. +1
    February 27 2020
    Modification of Tu95N with TuNevidimka technology.
  6. +2
    February 27 2020
    Have they even seen Tu142? And then it turns out that Tu142 was also absent in the sky, according to NATO flying sights!
  7. +3
    February 27 2020
    They simply accompanied him at a safe distance, just in case, heading in the opposite direction from the direction indicated by the radars.
    1. +5
      February 27 2020
      Quote: JcVai
      They simply accompanied him at a safe distance, just in case, heading in the opposite direction from the direction indicated by the radars.

      laughing
      How did we joke in our youth?
      The most effective method of karate - exhausting the enemy’s strength
  8. +2
    February 27 2020
    Again, the tax authorities broke the ass? bully
    1. 0
      February 27 2020
      And AFAR in addition.
  9. +2
    February 27 2020
    Meanwhile, the Russian Ministry of Defense stated that there was no Tu-95 in that area, and two Tu-142 anti-submarine aircraft made a planned flight over the neutral waters of the Barents and Norwegian Seas. It turns out, "not that caught."
    Visually, there is almost no difference between these planes, ours did not use "autonomous cloud" stealth technologies laughing .
  10. +4
    February 27 2020
    That had to be stated, the Tu-95 was flying in the latest development of the Russian military-industrial complex. Invisible hat.
  11. +5
    February 27 2020
    I can recognize the sound of TU-95 at home on the couch with the TV turned on. You can only confuse it with the AN-22, but it is no less visual. Keep it up NATO pilots good
    By the way, a joke in the subject
    NATO air forces are recruiting pilots. Receptionist is sitting
    commission (K).
    German comes in (N).
    Q: Do you have any flight experience?
    N: 15 years on a bomber !!!
    K: Is there any experience in fighting?
    N: That's right! Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Cambodia !!!
    Q: How much do you want to receive?
    N: 3.000 EURO !!!
    Q: Justify why exactly 3.000?
    N: 1.000 - for me, 1.000 - for family, 1.000 - for insurance !!!!
    K: Great. We will inform you about the results. Go ahead.
    Amerikos comes in (A).
    Q: Do you have any flight experience?
    A: 20 years on the fighter !!!
    K: Is there any experience in fighting?
    A: That's right! Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Croatia !!!
    Q: How much do you want to receive?
    A: 6.000 EURO !!!
    Q: Justify why exactly 6.000?
    A: 2.000 - for me, 2.000 - for the family, 2.000 - for insurance !!!!
    K: Great. We will inform you about the results. Go ahead.

    Russian enters (P).
    Q: Do you have any flight experience?
    R: What are you, stupid people? I am sick of the plane. I puke constantly !!!
    K: Is there any experience in fighting?
    R: Yes, I'm a pacifist. I can’t even kill a fly. I'm not in the army
    served !!!
    Q: How much do you want to receive?
    R: 9.000 EURO !!!
    Q: Justify why exactly 9.000?
    R: Well, why? 3.000 - to me, 3.000 - to you, well, but for 3.000 and German
    ready to fly !!!
  12. +1
    February 27 2020
    Fire !! Russians have a new technology that has no analogues in the world - SuperSTELS! Serial! Service life not less than 12 hours. Masks completely the whole squadron.
  13. +1
    February 27 2020
    "NATO fighters could not find the Russian Tu-95" - this is probably an anecdote?
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    February 27 2020
    ))) the fishermen were fishing ...)))
  16. +2
    February 27 2020
    It would be very good if there were links, otherwise you won’t understand anything from the article
    But if the link was ....
    https://www.airlive.net/breaking-raf-typhoon-fighter-jets-scrambled-after-a-russian-tu-95-has-been-spotted-west-of-norway/
    It would immediately become clear that
    1. The British did not look for Tu-95, and no one says that they found it in the Norwegian Sea (they write that off the western coast of Norway, that is, the North Sea generally works out.)
    The RAF aircraft are flying to Shetland Islands after a Russian TU-95 Bear bomber has been spotted near Norway coast, heading to West.

    2. The flight of the British was through the territory of England to their Shetland Islands after reports of a Tu-95 near Norway

    3. The point was that after the message, two English fighters and a tanker quickly flew out and patrolled between England and the Shetland Islands, far from Norway.
    4. The Barents Sea is a huge distance from the scene, it is not clear what the flights to the Barents are to do with it. Where are the Shetland Islands and where is the Barents Sea.
    In general, it’s good if the links gave, it would be clearer what the essence of the issue in the article
    hi
    1. 0
      February 28 2020
      And what is it geographically and tactically refutes? All the same, they were profane. We didn't go for a distant interception and decided to wait in our kitchen when he himself would fly closer because he was "... heading to West". But the Russians again did not come to the war and broke off the whole "victory".
      1. 0
        February 28 2020
        In the source text there is not a word that the British were going to intercept at all
        They just flew out to cover their islands just in case.
        It’s impossible to understand from the text whether it was really discovered or was the introduction to the exercises
        1. 0
          February 28 2020
          Quote: Avior
          There is not a word in the source text that the British were going to intercept at all, they just flew out to cover their islands just in case.

          Do you at least understand that all these excuses are reminiscent of kindergarten - "I won't because I don't want to ..."
          Everything is there: you also write "after a Russian TU-95 Bear bomber has been spotted near Norway coast, heading to West. "That is, they discovered (as they thought) a strategic bomber and threw three NATO fighters on its identification and abruptly threw the British with a tanker," just in case "? Key phrases" strategic "," bomber "and "to the west".
          1. 0
            February 28 2020
            I don’t know how you translated this phrase for yourself, but it’s not there that the British sent to intercept, search, identify, or even just to that area.
            but there is a map where you can clearly see where they flew and where they were on duty after that, obviously not to the coast of Norway
  17. +2
    February 27 2020
    (With a Latvian accent): Ne palluchylas.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. +2
    February 27 2020
    So, it turns out they did not see the Tu-142 pairs? good Well, guys, NATO, you have something completely ... relaxed. Well, yes, this is only for the best.
    1. 0
      February 27 2020
      I am sure they are fooling around, or, most likely, their press is driving a fool .. Our objects of this kind are visible from afar. This does not change the essence, there is tension, the spring is clamped, the swollen ones will not calm down ...
  20. 0
    February 27 2020
    Well, did they find the Tu-142? They are similar to the 95th ...
  21. +2
    February 27 2020
    Quote: Ax Matt
    So, it turns out they did not see the Tu-142 pairs? good Well, guys, NATO, you have something completely ... relaxed. Well, yes, this is only for the best.

    Actually more like a fake. About 1000 km from the Bodo da Barents Sea airbase, from Britain, from where fighters and the tanker started, actually about 3000 km. I wonder how, how they could detect or not detect something at such a distance. If you really picked it up and intercepted it is not known where - to knock on the head you need the navigator of the combat command. But most likely a fake
    1. 0
      February 28 2020
      The British zone to the west. The Norwegians and the Netherlands were much closer. It's about "all the valiant NATO."
  22. 0
    March 8 2020
    Here are burdocks, they were around the corner. fellow request laughing lol laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"