Chinese way. Almost manifest

143
Chinese way. Almost manifest

I represent Lin Tsai from the city of Changchun in the north of China. This is closer to our Vladivostok than to Beijing. Lin is an expert on Eurasian cooperation and, naturally, works for the Chinese Communist Party. And recently she published a very interesting opinion. Yes, of course, it has the right to life, despite the fact that there are controversial issues, so, having secured her consent, I suggest you get to know him.

I will try not to give any additional coloring to this material, that is, just give the opinion of a resident of China. Although, of course, there is also an opinion on this. So…





I communicate mainly with representatives of left-wing social movements and parties. But! Sometimes representatives of the right-wing political field also write to me. The whole essence of their many messages can be reduced to one short and capacious propaganda: “Tie up to play your ineffective socialism. Socialism is forever a thing of the past. If it weren’t for your bloody Communist Party, you would now live in Sweden. With a large package of social guarantees and without an iron curtain. "

I have something to answer this agitation. And right now I will give an extremely detailed answer.

Comrades! Look at India. One hundred years ago, India and China were at about the same level of economic development. And even in terms of population were very close. In the middle of the century the Communist Party came to power in China, a course was taken to build socialism. India remained capitalist.

What do we see today - in fact, not speculation?

China bypasses India, its neighbor, in absolutely all respects of socio-economic development. Surpasses economically. Superior culturally. Outperforms infrastructure.

Take, for example, the health care system.

Over the past twenty years, more than twenty thousand hospitals have been built in the People's Republic of China. Compulsory medical insurance, albeit for now, alas, not including all types of diseases, covers the entire population.

Do you understand what these huge numbers are? Are crazy. This is a fantastic leap forward in development that no capitalist country in the world is capable of.

What are the successes of India? They are actually not there. Four hundred million people do not have access to health care at all. Hospitals and hospital beds are sorely lacking. Sanitary standards are not respected. Medical equipment is widely used, which is outdated decades ago.

If China had not taken the socialist path of development in the middle of the last century, then it would not be any different now from its notorious neighbor. Why? Because the international division of labor and production, which is characteristic of a global capitalist society, would not allow China to become anything other than a resource appendage of the imperialist bloc of states led by the United States of America.

China has become different and now claims to be a great world power - only because, thanks to socialism, it has broken out of the framework of the capitalist division of production. Therefore, it is logical to consider the construction of socialism in China as part of the national liberation struggle of the Chinese people. Such a statement does not contradict Marxism.


In conclusion, I want to note that I am not at all happy about the plight of things in India. I am a communist. Internationalist. My soul hurts when I reflect on how the unhappy Indian people suffer. How hungry mothers suffer who have nothing to feed their children. How children suffer, whom no one will ever teach to read and write. How suffer fathers working fifteen hours a day, but not able to provide for their families.

And in fact in a similar way things are not only in India! Lawlessness. Exhausting, low paid labor. Lack of access to quality education and health care. Wars and bloody coups d'etat. All these are the realities of Latin America, Asia, Africa, the post-Soviet space. Billions of people are suffering. And they do not even hope that the terrible state of things will one day change for the better.

But the great philosopher Karl Marx, who left us the legacy of Marxism, proved that it is possible, and therefore, it is necessary to change the world for the better. And only Marxists are able to do this.

Conscious, educated representatives of the proletariat - a multibillion-dollar social class consisting of wage earners. So what are we waiting for? Why not acting?

The crime is to know that you can change this world for the better, and do nothing. It is time to engage in the global awakening of the proletariat. It is time to create Marxist circles, Marxist parties, merge them into the international and begin a decisive attack on the inhuman, cruel and criminal world.

It was on our share with you that happiness fell to realize the utopian dreams of all the oppressed. Build a new, fair world. A world without poverty. No wars. Without the contrary division of people into masters and slaves, suitable only for the interests of their wealthy masters.


In general, such a manifest is not bad. The old Karl Marx could be replaced by someone more modern - and more!

Do you know why I decided to take this opinion very seriously? Because in China there is one batch. CPC - The Communist Party of China. Yes, many will now say that we also have one. I agree. Yes, we also have a one-party system, all other non-partisans are simply attempts to create the appearance of democracy.

But is it possible to compare? Oh no. Of course not. Still, there is a difference, which, I think, is not worth explaining in detail. Between the CCP and EP. Who is behind the Chinese party, and who is behind the Russian.

“United Russia” is only able to sit in chairs and ensure “fair” elections, while the CCP does not need such petty games. The party already has everything, and most importantly - there are such party members who are ready to go, run, build ...

And they will go if the party says. And will kindle such a fire of revolution, some will get tired of extinguishing. And if you do it wisely, calmly, without marching tank and infantry columns ...

In any case, worthy of attention. And in general, in the Chinese Communist Party there is something so attractive that has long been no longer in the Russian parties.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

143 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    27 February 2020 06: 01
    The old Karl Marx could be replaced by someone more modern - and more!

    ? On brother Chubais?
    Old Marx will be right as long as there is capitalism.
    1. +11
      27 February 2020 06: 18
      Someone in Russia should think about it. However, they have tense thoughts, they fulfill the requirements of phasington.
      1. 0
        27 February 2020 06: 59
        for these successes, China received the coronavirus ... so that it slows down a little ...
      2. -13
        27 February 2020 11: 27
        For example, Fushington ordered Chinese banks not to cooperate with Russia, and they took it under the hood. Like Huaway. She was bent, and China did nothing. Because China is a colony imagining itself to be a master.
        1. +14
          27 February 2020 18: 02
          "Original" conclusions ...
          The United States is China's priority economic partner. The turnover is orders of magnitude more than with Russia, from which all resources are already pumped without problems in exchange for low-grade junk. Because they negotiate with the strong, and wipe their feet about the weak. This is exactly what the Chinese have done by refusing to "cooperate."
          1. -3
            28 February 2020 09: 20
            Nothing that Russia is the only country where China can buy really sophisticated technologies, like nuclear power plants?
            1. -2
              29 February 2020 14: 14
              Quote: EvilLion
              Nothing that Russia is the only country where China can buy really sophisticated technologies, like nuclear power plants?


              Do you even think about what you are writing?
              At least they asked a question.
              And then so simply and at ease with a full aplomb they sat down not like in a puddle.
              After such "shoals" - they used to shoot ...
        2. +1
          4 March 2020 01: 31
          Quote: EvilLion
          Like Huaway.

          I do not know such a company. I know Huawei. Remember, come in handy yet!
    2. +7
      27 February 2020 11: 06
      Quote: Slavutich
      Old Marx will be right as long as capitalism

      The Chinese communists became bourgeois. The activities of the CPC are of a bourgeois nature and are gaining global momentum as they abandon Marxism-Leninism. The policy pursued by the CPC may in the future lead to the creation of a new proletarian revolutionary movement. The CPC's bourgeois course was once opposed by the Maoist Communist Party of Nepal, as well as the New Chinese Left Bloc, created in 1972, to fight the restoration of capitalism in the PRC and return to the Maoist communist course.
      1. -23
        27 February 2020 12: 03
        If the Chinese communists had not become bourgeois, China would still be a poor country, like North Korea, but armed with the advanced ideas of "Marxism-Leninism. It is precisely because of the transition to a market economy that China rushed up.
        1. dSK
          0
          27 February 2020 13: 47
          Because the international division of labor and production, characteristic of a global capitalist society, would not allow China to become something other than a resource appendage of the imperialist bloc States led by the United States of America.
          1. +16
            27 February 2020 15: 59
            I present to you a member of the CCP, Lin Tsai, from the city of Changchun in the north of China

            wow they have party members! directly Mayakovsky’s verse asks for itself Yes
            Yes be me
            even a black man of advanced years,
            and then
            would visit China
            chinese would have learned
            just for
            what im
            said Lin Tsai.
            1. +8
              27 February 2020 18: 19
              Quote: Rich
              wow they have party members!

              good chinese girl!
              1. +9
                27 February 2020 18: 53
                Greetings to you, Sylvester.
                It’s a pity that Mikhan was again banned again, otherwise he would have revered his signature koment from the category - I would have told her laughing
                1. +6
                  27 February 2020 18: 56
                  Quote: Rich
                  Greetings to you, Sylvester.

                  good evening! But really, good! Beauty is a terrible force! hi
                  1. +6
                    27 February 2020 18: 58
                    You can’t argue with that
            2. +3
              28 February 2020 17: 45
              Quote: Rich
              would visit China
              chinese would have learned
              just for
              what im
              said Lin Tsai.

              I visited it, but learning Chinese (especially writing) is not enough for one ling tsai
              1. +3
                28 February 2020 18: 26
                Have you tried explaining with gestures?
                1. +2
                  28 February 2020 19: 17
                  Quote: Rich
                  Have you tried explaining with gestures?


                  they say they didn’t understand (they say: “show me in Chinese) and I yelled“ hende hoch ”, they don’t understand. laughing .where I was, in Russian they screw and explain clearly, but in supermarkets everywhere hieroglyphs are longing.
            3. +2
              29 February 2020 10: 27
              chinese would have learned
              just for
              what im
              said Lin Tsai. [/ quote]
              pretty girl !! love love love that’s what you need to take to the Party, they’ll follow them !!
              1. dSK
                +1
                1 March 2020 20: 02
                Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the law on the introduction of the title "City of Labor Valor". The politician introduced the corresponding draft federal law to the State Duma on December 14, 2019. The law was adopted by the State Duma on February 20, approved by the Federation Council on February 26.
                - which city will be awarded the title of first?
  2. +14
    27 February 2020 06: 03
    In China, if we compare it with Russian history: NEP, we’ll wait and see, but their economic model is definitely sharply more effective than the "tracing paper from the West" in Russia.
    1. -11
      27 February 2020 11: 28
      NEP ended very badly.
      1. -13
        27 February 2020 12: 04
        NEP ended very poorly. The first result of the folding of the NEP is the card system.
        1. -5
          27 February 2020 12: 14
          The history of the NEP is how to legalize drugs first, after which there are no problems with drugs on paper, and then again to ban, and lo and behold, problems appeared. So the NEP, at first they lifted the ban on the grain trade, but since it’s free, what cards, and then, when they realized that there was no life from speculators, they again introduced, of course, cards also appear.
          1. -11
            27 February 2020 12: 19
            The Bolsheviks introduced the New Economic Policy, frightened by mass peasant uprisings. As a result, trade normalized, goods appeared on the shelves, people got the opportunity to do their own thing.
            1. +2
              28 February 2020 09: 25
              Trade then "normalized" so that the cities from hunger already simply demanded that the authorities finally do something with the countryside and the kulaks. You really write some kind of nonsense. The very essence of speculation involves buying up a scarce commodity and creating an even larger deficit with an increase in price. Otherwise, it just doesn't work. And rightly so, that in the USSR they were imprisoned for speculation, because all the goods from speculators were bought up for the purpose of resale.
              1. -6
                28 February 2020 09: 35
                Under the New Economic Policy, there were goods in stores. Free sale. After its destruction, cards were introduced for both food and manufactured goods. And why is this fright, the peasant cannot demand the real price for the products he has grown? Not the one according to which the state squeezed the result of his work from the worker, but the real, market one, formed from the "supply - demand" ratio
                1. +1
                  28 February 2020 09: 58
                  Of course, I wildly apologize, but now we are having a discussion on the principle:
                  - Why aren’t nuclear reactors being built in Russia?
                  - Because they are being built!

                  The initial assertion that under the NEP everything was well is absolutely false. There were no goods in stores, maybe they were in the markets, but at horse prices. Because the NEP did not produce a damn thing, it is generally difficult to produce, it is much easier to engage in sales, as the whole history shows, including the Russian 90s, when prom. production at the bottom, and the whole country on the market.

                  Further, the peasant could not demand any real price, the state gave it to him anyway, otherwise he would not grow anything at all. Another thing is that the fist can offer him 5 kopecks per bag more. At the same time, the peasant himself rarely sells anything, in order to sell it is necessary to go to the market with sacks, and if it is far away, or he lent a horse only for plowing, well, in general, it is easier to hand over to a wholesaler. At the same time, large landowners' farms, which provided marketable grain, were partially destroyed (it is good if the state farm could do, or could simply distribute land to the peasants, who, without modern agricultural technology, would simply bring it to the state of their own allotments with a yield of 3, 4) ... That is, there is less marketable grain for export and for cities than before the revolution. And if grain is in short supply and is bought up by kulak wholesalers, and then by city speculators, then they will sell it at appropriate prices, and will not lay out the goods if the price does not suit them. Everyone needs to eat all the time, and grain can be stored for several years. So they won't go anywhere, they will pay exorbitant prices. True, it happens that it decays, which also does not improve the supply situation. And there is nothing to be surprised that then the hungry workers from the cities will go to the "insolent pisants" to clean their faces and look for the hidden grain.

                  This is not a free market; frank blackmail and extortion by the village are here.
                  1. -3
                    28 February 2020 10: 05
                    And this is the inability of the Bolsheviks to organize trade. Instead of organizing normal consumer cooperation, supporting the peasant in terms of marketing the crop, helping small private businesses, they drove them into collective farms, from where it was much easier to rake food, and destroyed private trade, replacing it with a cumbersome and clumsy distribution system. NEP, by the way, produced. Shoes, clothes, other consumer goods. After it was curtailed, elementary buttons disappeared and became scarce.
                    1. +1
                      28 February 2020 10: 47
                      Stolypin already tried to support this private business. But it was only necessary to do this 100 years earlier. As for the collective farms, the collective farm is the only way to give the farmer agricultural technology, because on tiny individual plots this will not work. A tractor will not pull every single peasant's yard. Investing here is worthless. Again, there are few tractors, many peasants. They can buy a tractor only a chipper. Well, this is called a production cooperative, in particular a collective farm. Not to mention the organization of maintenance of this equipment. It is possible to build several collective farms around one MTS, and they can still solve some problems among themselves if they rent something in turn.

                      And if we take conditionally 10 percent of the best hard workers, and most likely they will not be plowmen, but fists, and give loans, it will lead to the fact that they will simply become new landowners, they will buy land from everyone else, because they will also buy tractors then the need for a slave. their strength will fall, as a result, tens of millions of former peasants will trample down to cities where there is no work for them, which means that poverty and hunger will destroy the power and new landowners, if it gets wet, start the revolution again. The western farming route with sifting out the weak only works when this process is slow and the sifting out ones can digest the city or they migrate somewhere to Australia or Siberia. So in the 1820th they started, you see, and there would have been no problems in the 1920th. But why, more important, because helping Austrian colleagues in dangerous business to help sit on the throne. So what was needed was a plan for the enlargement of farms, capable of reaching everyone, and inevitably leaving the village, to provide work and study in the cities. Collectivization and industrialization are absolutely interconnected and mutually necessary processes.

                      Well, as for raking out, there is no need for a collective farm for this, there is a community, you can come to call the headman and say that the plan is such and such, bring to the attention of the others. Or do you think the master in the village handed out a rent to each plan? For this there is a clerk. It will be a lot of honor to communicate with each individual. Actually, they have lived for centuries. I remember E. Prudnikova in the program from Goblin asked a direct question: "What is needed for the development of agriculture?" Answer: "Farmer", and where is he? In the capital, instead of him a hired manager, who does not care about the peasants, his task is to bring the norms of corvee.

                      NEP, by the way, produced. Shoes, clothes, other consumer goods. After it was curtailed, elementary buttons disappeared and became scarce.


                      Well, confuse the 1927th year and acceleration of production. Khrushchev cooperatives in the 1960th, no one was forbidden to produce buttons. The state is generally a lazy thing, it usually does not bother to do what it can do without it. And to create a distribution system - it also requires resources, without the need to do it no one will.
                      1. -2
                        28 February 2020 10: 51
                        Stolypin was not given so much time to history. The prime minister did not have time, and sticks in the wheels popped into him both on the right and on the left. Although my ancestors in his reform left the community, in short, they changed their lives for the better.
                      2. +2
                        28 February 2020 11: 27
                        The Bolsheviks after the Military Alert of 1927, when it became clear that soon there was a big war, managed with all the problems and sticks in wheels for 6 years. No 20 years of peace, no one was going to give Russia neither then nor now. Well, the personal fate of your ancestors here is not an indicator at all, the community perfectly understood that if it was canceled and free competition, not all would survive in the most literal sense.

                        To reduce the problem to Stolypin alone is somehow strange, we have to admit that he was the only one so smart, the others did not see anything at all. However, all that the Empire was able to "give out on the topic" was Stolypin, and when oncology had already entered its last stage, and his attempts to treat it by leading a "healthy lifestyle".
                      3. -2
                        28 February 2020 11: 36
                        Correctly, in a competitive environment, the fittest survives - he and feed the country, weak-fed with difficulty fed themselves. The bet was made correctly. The ruined join the ranks of the proletariat, in the 10s of the last century there was a shortage of workers in the growing industry. 20 years later, Stalin did the same, but by forced means. Collectivization has freed up a ton of labor for industrialization.
                      4. +1
                        28 February 2020 11: 59
                        Quote: AS Ivanov.
                        Correctly, in a competitive environment, the fittest survives - he and feed the country, weak-fed with difficulty fed themselves. The bet was made correctly. The ruined join the ranks of the proletariat, in the 10s of the last century there was a shortage of workers in the growing industry. 20 years later, Stalin did the same, but by forced means. Collectivization has freed up a ton of labor for industrialization.

                        Do you even understand how much it would take your beloved capitalist natural path of trial and error? 90s taught nothing?
                      5. -2
                        29 February 2020 15: 26
                        How many lives have a socialist unnatural path cost, don’t you remember?
                      6. +1
                        1 March 2020 12: 09
                        Quote: AS Ivanov.
                        How many lives have a socialist unnatural path cost, don’t you remember?

                        How about building nuclear power plants through trial and error? Or planes by eye?
                        What fabulous boobies are supporters of capitalism. laughing
                      7. -2
                        1 March 2020 12: 55
                        Well, the Americans have built a nuclear power plant. And their planes turned out better than ours. It seems like they have capitalism, no?
                      8. 0
                        1 March 2020 19: 56
                        Yes, capitalism. I am very glad that you are slowly starting to understand that the scientific approach and planning is quite a logical result of the development of human society. laughing
                      9. -1
                        1 March 2020 20: 56
                        It seems like they have capitalism, no?
                        in Latin America, too, capitalism, something paradise is not visible there ... The Russian Federation is dying out from "capitalist happiness"
                      10. +1
                        28 February 2020 11: 57
                        Quote: AS Ivanov.
                        The prime minister did not have time, and sticks in the wheels popped into him both on the right and on the left.

                        An interesting approach. And should they have helped in every way and worldwide? You have not confused anything? This is real life, not your ideas about it. laughing
                      11. -2
                        28 February 2020 12: 00
                        The emperor claimed the post of Stolypin. But, for some reason, instead of support, in every possible way complicated his work. This is incomprehensible. Unlike his criticism by the left - everything is clear with them.
                    2. +1
                      29 February 2020 10: 37
                      Quote: AS Ivanov.
                      And this is the inability of the Bolsheviks to organize trade.

                      In fact, the Chinese economy is a hybrid of NEP and industrialization. The state organizes and supports industry-forming enterprises - machine tools, high-tech raw materials, etc. and private traders are already sewing, collecting .. consumer goods and selling them around the world. At one time, in the joys of having our own industry, we began to stifle the NEP, In China, no .. there they coexist and the Communist Party maintains balance.
                      By the way, the wise Communist Party of China forbade its non-communist entrepreneurs to invest in the Russian processing industry and the Chinese bourgeoisie took their visors.
  3. +8
    27 February 2020 06: 10
    All right says. Only modern China, having broken out at the expense of socialism into the economic leaders of the world, is now trying hard to replace the United States in the capitalist system, leading it. At the moment, talking about Marxism in China is ridiculous. And the assertion that all Chinese have access to excellent education and medicine is undeniable.
    1. +18
      27 February 2020 07: 03
      Modern China has become a leader thanks to massive and inexpensive socialist labor and modern and efficient capitalist technologies. The Chinese are smart people, they use two systems from which they took the best for their country, massive and not expensive labor, they combined with Western technologies that were successfully copied and now they are a world factory, which is very difficult to compete with, maybe they are behind in some ways, but they are learning quickly, so in the next few decades, they will be the first in everything.
      1. +1
        27 February 2020 07: 28
        The "damned Bolsheviks" did the same.
        1. +1
          27 February 2020 07: 39
          All that the Bolsheviks and Communists have done, we have at the moment.
          1. +9
            27 February 2020 18: 21
            we live by the fact that ...
            Quote: Pessimist22
            made by the Bolsheviks and Communists


            Quote: Pessimist22
            ... we have at the moment.

            the result of the lack of brains in management
            1. +2
              28 February 2020 21: 06
              Quote: Silvestr
              the result of the lack of brains in management

              I would not hope so. They have brains, and they do everything competently, only pretending to be narrow-minded. It is important to understand that their true goals are directly opposite to those stated. And only having understood their true goals, all their actions become logical. hi
        2. -4
          27 February 2020 11: 31
          The Bolsheviks built a country with a focus on domestic needs, rather than earning dollars by tailoring sneakers for export, just to feed the population.

          So excuse me, but I completely agree with Oleg Egorov. China is not a superpower, but a large France, and even then at best, whose entire policy does not differ from the "policy" of the owner of a factory for the production of consumer goods. China cannot and is not going to either offer something to the world, or solve global problems.
          1. +1
            28 February 2020 12: 55
            Quote: EvilLion
            China is not a superpower, but a large France, and even then at best, whose entire policy does not differ from the "policy" of the owner of a factory for the production of consumer goods. China cannot and is not going to either offer something to the world, or solve global problems.

            Moreover, he is the main competitor to the United States. Do not you find that your opinion is somehow not very consistent with this fact?
    2. +2
      27 February 2020 09: 02
      Cheap labor and energy instead of coal. Before the arrival of the Americans, the Chinese themselves only got hungweipings and all sorts of "big leaps."
    3. -1
      28 February 2020 14: 31
      China escaped because it was given to escape. How much dough did they upload there? And then everyone argues: socialism, communism, capitalism. Concepts for the divorce of suckers and the cover of true goals ... As once when world Zionism pumped loot and the United States became the hegemon of the world, so at the turn of 80 -90 it happened to China. The Chinese leadership under the same cap as all other countries of the world ...
      https://inosmi.ru/world/20150330/227177792.html
      Like in the last comment on the article ...
  4. +22
    27 February 2020 06: 14
    So thinking people have long understood the advantage of socialism, it is enough to compare the figures of economic growth during the Soviet era (even the Gorbachev period; how his accomplices managed to arrange a total deficit with empty shelves in stores is a separate question), and now. Earth and sky. Well, China has for many years already exceeded all the "sharks of the West" by the rate of economic development. Moreover, which is typical, without the total crises that shock the capitalist economies. So yes, the political system needs to be changed.
    1. -4
      27 February 2020 08: 44
      So they said the same thing 30 years ago, rapturously destroying the Scoop, now let's move on to the competition to the market, then we will live ... If we lived poorly under the communists under the bandits under the capitalists now, then the system has nothing to do with it ..
    2. +2
      27 February 2020 11: 33
      Well, if you produce a million trucks from them, donate half to Africa and destroy the second half, because the state still gives, then the GDP will be large, and the stomachs of the population are small.
  5. +7
    27 February 2020 06: 23
    Everything is true and beautifully written. Socialism is good in itself and it is simply saving for all countries not included in the core of the world capitalist system. Unfortunately, we have seen this from our own experience, we have been reaping the fruits of the rejection of socialism since 1985.
    However, in China there are big problems, both external and internal. Main internal
    1) China wisely used market mechanisms for its development. They (unlike the USSR) had objective prerequisites for this - the presence of huge reserves of hardworking and undemanding labor and a warm climate with access to the ocean. In combination with the control of the social state, this gave excellent results, but there is also a downside. Market relations contradict the very essence of socialism. The influence of the Chinese owners pushes the PRC to capitalism all the time.
    2) China boosted industrial development, becoming a global factory. This had its price — acute environmental problems, dependence on external sales markets, and on the whole on the state of the global capital economy, the need for ever greater consumption of resources, etc.
    External
    1) The PRC was able to play very beautifully on the contradictions between the USSR and the USA, and being closely connected with the economic world for a long time, it was able to avoid direct confrontation with the West. Now it’s not possible to avoid this already, China is more and more drawn into a full-fledged war, so far the economic and informational. But the collective West with satellites is still much stronger.
    2) The project of "socialism with Chinese characteristics" does not claim to be inclusive (like Russian communism), it is purely Chinese regional socialism. This is a plus - the PRC does not cause such fear and hatred in the capitalist world as the USSR, but also a minus. A regional development project cannot beat a global project.
    1. +2
      27 February 2020 07: 41
      Cuba and North Korea, the socialist states, how they live there you can see, now everything is available.
      1. 0
        1 March 2020 21: 29
        Haiti and Bangladesh - Capitalist
        you can see how they live there, now everything is available.
        But Cuba has a very decent healthcare system (for example, the lowest infant mortality rate among the countries of the American continent), and North Korea has a pretty good arsenal for such a small country!
    2. -3
      27 February 2020 09: 32
      I do not agree that it all started in 1985 .... unfortunately much earlier
  6. +7
    27 February 2020 06: 27
    In one thing, she is exactly right - everything is known in comparison, and comparison is not in favor of India, and not in favor of capitalism.
    1. -6
      27 February 2020 08: 47
      What is convenient is what compares. Hong Kong from mainland China shy away from the plague. Fortunately, the virus has dispersed everyone to their homes
      1. +2
        27 February 2020 09: 33
        Nowhere in the end Hong Kong from China will not go anywhere
        1. -10
          27 February 2020 12: 37
          I'm so sorry for Hong Kong. This is a country with the highest standard of living.
          1. +2
            27 February 2020 15: 37
            Quote: AU Ivanov.
            I'm so sorry for Hong Kong. This is a country with the highest standard of living.


            Not quite a country, all the same foreign policy, defense of China. And given that Hong Kong is very closely economically connected with China, then it has only one path, to return to its home harbor in 2047 as it was intended. By the way, in Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Shanghai, there is also a very high standard of living, fairly developed megacities with good infrastructure, and in general, China is developing very rapidly and megacities are growing like mushrooms after rain.
  7. +2
    27 February 2020 06: 38
    What do we need, how do we do it ???
    It's just a transition to another path, now it's not realistic ... then we go on our way further and get ready !!! But why, this is a question to which there are "many answers", but the right way, not so that everything is the way.
    1. +1
      1 March 2020 23: 41
      "own road" - a raw material appendage ?????
      1. 0
        2 March 2020 05: 05
        This is not an answer to the question "Where are we all being taken?" was!
        This is a statement of the fact that they lead us like a goby on a rope, somewhere.
  8. +8
    27 February 2020 06: 43
    Article agitation. The Asian mentality cannot be changed - there a person is perceived only as a unit that should be used to the maximum for the sake of achievement ... but just with the achievement of something there on Buddhist affairs, it’s tight, there is no need for achievements at all, there important is "just the way" - even though there is nowhere, such as "nirvana". The Asian type "communists" altered this "Buddhist doctrine" in their own way-like it is necessary to move and move, build "prosperity", but not for everyone, regardless of the contribution to the common product, as Lenin said, but for the "worthy" for those who meet certain requirements, but these requirements will be set not by the people, as it might seem logical for Leninist communism, but by a handful of the elect - the "party", and not even the whole party, but by those elected from the party in closed meetings. That is, China has again returned to the class system disguised as "communism with Chinese characteristics." It is no coincidence that in China they still praise Mao so much, who at one time was so enthusiastic about the structure of the society of ants and considered them a role model in building human society. China has nothing to do with communism - it is an Asian autocracy with a new caste - new "nobles" - "with party membership cards" at the top, and society is becoming more and more castorized - divided into castes, moreover, closed ones. Actually, there is nothing surprising here - customization, this is a process characteristic of absolutely all states - the isolation of the "ruling elite" at the top in order to prevent "others" from being controlled and concentrate in their hands all the levers of management and accumulation of "wealth". relying on loyal lower-level caste groups, which are closed to the top, but there is a way to increase their well-being in the internal hierarchy of the caste. China is absolutely following the same path, and it doesn't even smell of any kind of "democracy" there.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -3
      27 February 2020 09: 18
      Agitation Article
      I completely agree with you. The West invested in China because of cheap labor. I have a lot of friends who visit China on business. Nobody will work for that salary. Our specialists are well received, and even then until the Chinese intercept his experience and "dosvidos".
      1. +2
        27 February 2020 09: 34
        The Chinese have long been not the cheapest labor
  9. +3
    27 February 2020 07: 03
    The party already has everything, and most importantly, there are such party members who are ready to go, run, build ...

    Not entirely true. The CCP has a second half of its success, which not everyone in Russia will like today. The CCP in China is leading and guiding .... And those who are not with the CCP are against, which means they are under pressure from the state. We had this during the period of industrialization and collectivization. The country then took off with incredible acceleration. But remember the fate of the SRs and the Trotskyists. Today in China it is about the same. Are we ready to repeat our 30s? We must be aware that the people "in a single impulse" will not go anywhere without stimulation and coercion from the state. Today, all economic "miracles" occur when conditions are created that are economically beneficial for entrepreneurs, and their movements are very inert. All import substitution in our country took place by the forces of state corporations, partly through the "good old" administrative command method, which is possible only for state-owned enterprises.
    1. +5
      27 February 2020 07: 24
      Chinese bosses with party membership cards have discovered the incredible opportunities that the "digital revolution" provides in terms of social governance. They understood a simple thing - the GULAG can be created within the society itself using digital technologies, that is, there is no need to build "concentration camps behind barbed wire" and forcibly force "enemies of the people" to bend in mines and "people-building", everything can be done much easier and more efficiently with help of "cipher technologies", creating a system of total control over all activities of each person. With the help of strict "laws" a person is driven into a digital concentration camp, receiving a "digital profile" and "electronic citizen card", turning into a controlled unit that has a permissive and incentive system in managing his "digital profile" in accordance with his compliance with the requirements of the "state", that is, he is governed by deprivation or, on the contrary, adding some opportunities to his "digital profile" by squeezing or expanding the scope of his "freedom" to live in society. For example, you can deprive a person of the opportunity to work in a certain area, in a certain industry or region and make it so that he, in order not to die of hunger, will have only one opportunity - to go "voluntarily" to work at "people's construction" or in mines. None of you - "barbed wires" - you allow a person to work and move only within one place and voila, he will not go anywhere - there are "face control" systems everywhere - you cannot even enter the bus through the turnstile to go to another place and you will not buy anything in stores in another area. This is the "Chinese future" - "human, digital anthill". And by the way, it seems that this is the future that will be built in Russia with the help of our "Chinese friends", I would not be under the delusion that the "digital concentration camp" will bypass Russia - everything goes to this, not so fast like in China, but it goes.
      1. +3
        27 February 2020 07: 35
        Quote: Snail N9
        With the help of strict "laws" a person is driven into a digital concentration camp

        Most likely, total digitalization will overwhelm us, like all other countries that consider themselves the "first world". This is the spirit of the times. In a way, we will come to Orwell's 1984. Time will tell how this is implemented.
      2. 0
        27 February 2020 09: 35
        Digital Prison has long been spreading its bars around the world
      3. -5
        27 February 2020 12: 14
        And with us, as always, the implementation of the digital concentration camp is disappointing. Like a telegram lock. Fortunately, the rigor of Russian laws is offset by the non-binding nature of their implementation.
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      27 February 2020 09: 05
      Some parties are valid only in Hong Kong and Macau. And those that operate in the main territory of China recognize the leadership role of the CCP. The number of members of these parties combined is many times smaller than the number of members of the CCP.
      1. +1
        27 February 2020 09: 47
        Quote: Sergej1972
        Some parties are valid only in Hong Kong and Macau. And those that operate in the main territory of China recognize the leadership role of the CCP. The number of members of these parties combined is many times smaller than the number of members of the CCP.


        It's not about bans. Among the Chinese, the CCP’s authority is VERY high. At the household level (communicated - I know) the CCP is the first party to feed a huge country. It just provided the entire population with food. What came before the CCP is hell. Born girls were drowned in the nearest reservoir at the beginning of the XNUMXth century. For a girl is a waste of family resources. Horror. And then the communists came. Chairman Mao - worship. Quotations are everywhere. Not under duress. Therefore, the mass is for the CCP. But there are many others. Join is not prohibited.
        1. 0
          27 February 2020 11: 32
          These parties, by the way, are ranked when mentioned in official communications. The second, after the CCP, is the Kuomintang Revolutionary Committee.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +4
    27 February 2020 08: 29
    Quote: Pessimist22
    Cuba and North Korea, the socialist states, how they live there you can see, now everything is available.

    Cuba has been given to you. They live their own lives. In everyday life, no one presses on them. What you can eat, what you can drink. They don’t give advice. Some small businessmen left for Vietnam. And they don’t complain. You have some kind of itch about socialism.
  13. +3
    27 February 2020 08: 33
    The Americans moved production to China and invested trillions of dollars in investments. India has not received such money.

    If socialism was so good, where was China before Deng Xiaoping?
    The Chinese economic miracle began exactly when the Americans made friends with China and made it a cheap factory for their citizens.
    1. -4
      27 February 2020 12: 12
      The beginning of the Chinese economic miracle was laid back in the late 70s - early 80s, with the beginning of Deng Xiaoping's economic market reforms.
  14. +4
    27 February 2020 08: 39
    I don’t particularly envy China. Often I watch movie trips. There are a lot of people in cities. It’s very unusual for us. But I’m not going to scold. With so many people and social programs it’s admirable. Any other country with such a population would simply be lost .
    1. -3
      27 February 2020 09: 38
      One thing on TV, but in reality, the first time you get to China, you first fall into a stupor — how many of them !!!!!!!
      1. 0
        27 February 2020 11: 37
        Everything is relative. Here are many provincials who do not like Moscow crowded places. And I, the same provincial, am surprised that there are not many people in the streets of Moscow visually. Some people don’t like skyscrapers, and I would be glad that there were ten times more, and higher.) In general, cities should be compact. Let there be more forests.
        1. -1
          27 February 2020 11: 49
          Well, I don’t know whether it’s relative or not ... even compared to Mexico City, who doesn’t know exactly how many people, Beijing and Shanghai simply amaze ... and all at once look the same ... and when flying to Moscow, oh, how few people are, but I’m already finally arriving home completely in the desert, people ay !!!!!! and there are less and less compact cities, urbanization, huge ones absorbing themselves like a vacuum cleaner, an example of oh Moscow ... and Lyubertsy for example .... there is no border. .only inscriptions
          1. +1
            27 February 2020 12: 47
            We have a lot of Chinese studying, they never seemed to me on one face. And at first it was striking that many of them, despite the widespread opinion, were by no means narrow-eyed.)
    2. -3
      27 February 2020 20: 08
      And how long have you been traveling on TV?
      He took a passport and flew for the weekend belly to warm. I saw in real life how Cuban comrades live. Do not campaign for them
  15. +3
    27 February 2020 08: 41
    Only those who have the ability to appropriate the fruits of the labor of thousands of ordinary citizens are drowning for capitalism. There is no other "attraction" in it. Only a brake on development. From simple families to civilization in general.
    1. +2
      27 February 2020 11: 40
      Well, small and medium business should develop anyway. It's just that, unfortunately, the moral qualities of many (by no means all, and not even the majority - don't think anything bad) of "small" businessmen are questionable.
    2. -11
      27 February 2020 12: 08
      And you have not yet succumbed to socialism during the USSR?
      1. +5
        27 February 2020 12: 47
        Do you have a burp?
        1. -9
          27 February 2020 12: 50
          Similarly - belching, and with rotten. It’s not very edible, this socialism is performed by the Soviet Union.
          1. +1
            27 February 2020 12: 52
            Just get rid of the zombies around you!
            1. -11
              27 February 2020 12: 56
              I mainly see, especially on this site, zombified with communist propaganda. A sort of sect of "witnesses of the USSR"
          2. +3
            27 February 2020 16: 02
            Quote: AS Ivanov.
            and with rotten.


            A cho rot fed? In the USSR, the products were more qualitative than now. Although you can see the lover of this, and the comments you can smell.
            1. -6
              27 February 2020 16: 10
              Don’t you choose a high-quality product from all the current abundance, or are you force-fed substandard? This is not a scoop, where eat what they give. If you have time to buy it, it’s not yet taken apart. I’ll tell you one secret - then all over the world the products were better than now, due to the lack of appropriate technologies.
          3. 0
            29 February 2020 00: 13
            Have you lived in the Soviet Union then? Judge here.
      2. 0
        29 February 2020 00: 11
        Already sick of your capitalism! Here the sores will begin to pester you immediately understand the difference!
    3. -5
      27 February 2020 17: 42
      Capitalism is drowned by people who are accustomed to thinking, initiative and business. Accustomed to walk in the herd and look into the mouth of a good uncle - drown for socialism.
      1. 0
        29 February 2020 00: 20
        However, you are a giant of thought! Creative! It’s interesting what business people like you think)))
        Would not be dishonored by their worldview not clouded by excessive knowledge! Your liberal cliches are sore. Although I understand you, it’s hard to come up with something yourself.
  16. -1
    27 February 2020 08: 44
    Do not pour salt on my wounds ...
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +7
    27 February 2020 09: 01
    Slyly disingenuous expert.
    It does not take into account that the Chinese live in China, and the Indians in India.
    Which is not the same at least in terms of hard work.

    Indian yoga doesn’t care what structure to sit and meditate for years under, even under capitalism, even under socialism.
    But the Chinese from the internal provinces also have no difference, in which order to drag a wheelbarrow and wave a pickax.

    But, for example, the expert does not compare the post-war stories of mainland China and Taiwan for some reason.
    Or closest neighbors - Koreans. Also does not compare.
    The expert is also cunning about the division of labor. China rushed just when it found its place in the very capitalist division of labor and became a large assembly factory. And the other has already reached for the first.
    It is impossible, of course, to deny that the Chinese themselves in their states also try to maintain order with officials and other things by rather tough measures, this is not bad, but only if this is all that is necessary for success, then the DPRK would be a world leader in all areas .
    smile
    PS
    very interesting opinion. Yes, of course it has the right to life


    Of course, I do not agree with the expert, but I am for such experts to appear on the VO, with photos, of course. You can even open an expert column in the style of “The Naked Truth” - I will not mind smile
    1. 0
      29 February 2020 00: 24
      Searched, searched, and found a place in the capitalist division ... somehow your version looks foggy and not very believable. Russia also searched, searched .... Romania is seeking, Greece ...
  19. -1
    27 February 2020 09: 06
    My soul hurts when I reflect on how the unhappy Indian people suffer. How hungry mothers suffer who have nothing to feed their children.


    Well, it’s straight the Soviet party meeting.
    1. 0
      29 February 2020 00: 25
      And you were a communist, Reasoning here with the appearance of an expert?
  20. +1
    27 February 2020 09: 29
    Only Chinese people can walk in Chinese ways.
  21. 0
    27 February 2020 09: 30
    A wonderful manifesto ... but Roman, let's be objective, we must compare the CCP, starting with the CPSU and with other parties that were at the helm, and the conclusion will be sad that the MAO was right when it reared up against the course of Khrushchev, which began after Stalin's death. China, like the USSR, walked the path of mistakes, blood, repression, but didn’t get out of the hands of the main thread and found a path along which the USSR hadn’t Khrushchev, God had given Stalin more life and had he prepared the continuity, there would have been no collapse, and would we be a real Great Power to this day
    1. +6
      27 February 2020 10: 18
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      it is necessary to compare the CCP starting with the CPSU and with other parties


      Meaning? The CPSU has long been everything, and the CCP works as if nothing had happened. Soon there will be a centenary, by the way.

      Quote: Andrey VOV
      China went along the path of mistakes, blood and repression like the USSR


      That's right, but we are talking about today and tomorrow, and not about what happened 60 years ago. I do not know what a bright future China has, but it will most likely just be.
      1. -1
        27 February 2020 10: 23
        In the next couple of years, not everything will be all right in China, as in many, thanks to the journalists who fan the hysteria about coronovirus. About the fact that there is no Communist Party for a long time .. well de jure yes, I agree, but de facto ... many former who are in power, who are in the so-called opposition. Well, if the CCP and Edro, then it’s also not entirely correct ... the CCP has a much tougher hierarchy, the responsibility of members for affairs is incomparable with the fact that we have a lot of similarities, but also a lot of differences
        1. +4
          27 February 2020 10: 28
          Quote: Andrey VOV
          In the next couple of years, not everything will be fine with China, like many


          Well, somehow there they are optimistic about all this. Type AIDS survived, bird flu survived, and survive it. The antivirus with the crown has already been invented.
          1. -1
            27 February 2020 10: 31
            Yes, everyone is optimistic, except for WHO and pharmaceutical companies, that such a cymes and gesheft from scratch, and the fact that China’s economy is not only a blow to a trillion ... even Uncle Trump is concerned about this infection, although he has the biggest this profit. And China rescues them just freakish discipline and efficiency ... but after all, even then we could ... not just a hospital in seven days, but industries in months from one place to another
    2. -8
      27 February 2020 15: 46
      How many Great Helmsman destroyed his people there during the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward? Stalin nervously smokes Herzegovina Flor aside.
      1. +3
        27 February 2020 16: 08
        Quote: AS Ivanov.
        How many Great Helmsman destroyed his people there during the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward


        Ukraine in 30 years destroyed 1/3 of the population. And there is no jump, but there is a jump into the abyss. Developed capitalism however. And the total losses of the countries that were part of the USSR (over 30 years) are 70-75 million people.

        Quote: AS Ivanov.
        Stalin nervously smokes Herzegovina Flor aside.
        1. -3
          27 February 2020 16: 14
          Do not confuse emigration and physical destruction. And there is no developed capitalism in Ukraine - there is the same as our developed bureaucracy. Developed capitalism is being built by China and it is already succeeding.
          1. +2
            27 February 2020 16: 28
            Quote: AS Ivanov.
            Do not confuse


            I do not confuse. This is not only emigration. This and
            Quote: AS Ivanov.
            physical destruction.


            Moreover, focused and constant, and not a company. And the country in the economic, military, scientific with an educated population was among the leaders.
            and HAS CAPITALISM (BY TIPS AND LEGALS OF THE FOREIGN BUREAU). Well, that is, complete degradation. An absolute example.
            1. -3
              27 February 2020 16: 31
              Can Ukrainians beat sticks with sticks? Or hoes, like in Cambodia under the communist Paul Pot?
              1. +3
                27 February 2020 16: 38
                Quote: AS Ivanov.
                Communist Paul Pot?


                It was a deal. The communist Pol Pot communists (Vietnamese) and kicked under the cries and cries of the capitalists.
                Do you need an example of how the capitalists stacked people in packs into the grave? Or will you find it yourself?
                1. -8
                  27 February 2020 16: 41
                  The communists did it much better than the capitalists. There was also one socialist, with the prefix "national". So he is in the destruction of people in general number one in the world, where there is the bourgeoisie before him.
                  1. +4
                    27 February 2020 17: 02
                    Quote: AS Ivanov.
                    There was also a socialist


                    Ha! If, I give an example of the successes of communist China, you will deny and refer, saying what kind of socialism is it?
                    And in this case? Purely your boyfriend. There even slogans were appropriate. And you are about the working party.
                    You will not tell when the laws of racial segregation were repealed in the United States (in all states). Or why in Mexico the indigenous population prevails (even mestizos), and in the much larger United States several million? Moreover, the territory is favorable for living (in Canada this is worse, but more radical).
                    Where are hundreds of millions of Indians?
                    Why, Hitler looks like a bully from kindergarten.
                    1. -4
                      27 February 2020 17: 12
                      China has ceased to be communist and even socialist since the lifting of the ban on private ownership of the means of production. The means of production in private hands are already capitalism, no matter how the ruling party calls itself. And the Chinese economy began to make progress only with the transition to a market.
                      1. +3
                        27 February 2020 17: 28
                        Quote: AS Ivanov.
                        Yes, and the success of the Chinese economy


                        And why not the success of Ukraine?
                        INITIAL.
                        An educated, hardworking population. Fertile land. A powerful economy (engineering, electronics, energy, aviation and shipbuilding, etc.).

                        And came capitalism.
                        TOTAL- an endangered country with a destroyed economy.
                        Continue to continue, or yourself ...
                      2. -6
                        27 February 2020 17: 32
                        Neither in Russia nor in Ukraine is there any mention of capitalism. The authorities are the same bureaucrats with a communist past. The same Soviet eggs - side view. Capitalism has come in Sweden, Canada, Belgium, Israel at last. There really is capitalism, and in our country the kingdom of a developed bureaucracy.
                      3. +3
                        27 February 2020 18: 00
                        Quote: AS Ivanov.
                        not at all.


                        No, this is a system. built as in nature (therefore, different capitalism). Each has its own place in the food pyramid. With all the consequences. Dissenters are driven into democracy and liberalism. Some bombs, some sanctions.
                        Totalitarian liberalism.
                        А
                        Quote: AS Ivanov.
                        The bureaucrats are in power

                        with a capitalist past.
                      4. -6
                        27 February 2020 18: 34
                        With the communist. In whom do not spit, you will fall into a former member, or Komsomol leader. From that we live. Not a single capitalist in his right mind and solid memory would destroy the Union; it would be unprofitable for him for financial reasons - to break off economic ties is dangerous for his own wallet. And ours still, according to an old habit, ideology governs the economy. Until the communist nonsense of those in power is overlooked, we will live like that.
                      5. +1
                        27 February 2020 18: 44
                        Boring. You don’t even understand what I wrote.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. +7
    27 February 2020 11: 50
    Russia and China have swapped places, Russia has become an energy colony, and China is a superpower.
    Whoever disagrees with this is deceiving himself.
  24. +6
    27 February 2020 12: 12
    It is difficult to say whether they live well in China. In Moscow, I often see Chinese tourists, they are unloaded in stacks from buses - I think they are not the poorest Chinese, since there was enough money and time to pull on such a long trip - so, they are dressed like that. Somewhere in the late 90s our audience loved to dress so much .. Okay, one could say "they have such a style" - good. But they don't look like cake either - young people are thin and pale, short, with faded and sparse hair, old people are also small, wrinkled, worn and faded people, rather thin. Of course, a lot could be attributed to the diet, but I want to convey one thought - for the majority it is immediately obvious that the guys plow there like horses, plow for a long time, in not the best conditions, and the habits are appropriate - such that even when they get to the park for the most part they will cuddle the benches and sit hunched over in their smartphones. Work - home - work - as a cult, as the only possible and true life.
    This is what I see when I see most Chinese tourists. No, there is certainly a beautiful and fashionable audience that rushes like bees to shops and take selfies on every corner - but this is a multiple minority ..
    As in Sweden - these guys would not live for sure) Even if they bought America with giblets. One and a half lard of the population of kakbe hints that there will always be the wildest-packed city environment, shitty ecology, tough fake food, no personal space and fierce competition in everything, starting from kindergarten. The fact that they now live is PROBABLY the best possible image for themselves - oh, yes! But this is definitely not our way - we have already gone through all this, we saw how it MAY end in an instant - and although there are people who want to repeat it, right along Marx - I would not risk it)
    It is better to study the European experience - there both values ​​are closer, and the standard of living / population is closer to our understanding of "good".
  25. +1
    27 February 2020 13: 26
    Quote: Far In
    So thinking people have long understood the advantage of socialism, it is enough to compare the figures of economic growth during the Soviet era (even the Gorbachev period; how his accomplices managed to arrange a total deficit with empty shelves in stores is a separate question), and now. Earth and sky. Well, China has for many years already exceeded all the "sharks of the West" by the rate of economic development. Moreover, which is typical, without the total crises that shock the capitalist economies. So yes, the political system needs to be changed.

    And very simply, the same all-great "KGB". There is no one else especially.
  26. -1
    27 February 2020 13: 36
    Damn, are there really glamorous Chinese bloggers still in nature - escort girl girls in full content of the International Department of the CPC Central Committee? laughing
  27. +2
    27 February 2020 15: 26
    Her nose is an offset love
    __ Report back as she gave, hmm ... in the sense of a bot, even sobbed - "my soul hurts ...".
    __ getting married, so be it. Give the number pliz.

    Well this is necessary so they mocked us, here words are not enough. Not greed, but dullness and laziness broke the CPSU, rejected the Stalin's covenants, imagined themselves feudal lords, and now their children rule. The fate of the country begins with sovereignty. Since 1917, it has not been and is not to this day. And at the helm all the same.
    __ Do not FIG discuss the CCP and compare with the Communist Party, you have to deal with yourself, the thieves have all the money. And they have power. And the moratorium will not be lifted, it is an international level / institution. Courage is not enough. Yes, and for themselves, such laws write that the Boschs, as under the kings, would not be cut, but they would not be put on a stake.
    ___ Thank you to the author, there would be more pictures =)
    1. +3
      27 February 2020 15: 40
      This Lin Tsai did not find.
      Found another, but she is from Taiwan

      this capitalist Lin Tsai is also nothing smile

      smile
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +2
          27 February 2020 16: 00
          "Different noses are needed, different noses are important"
          smile
          And the first one has not only a nose, everything else is very outstanding smile
      2. +1
        27 February 2020 15: 59
        No, no, not at all. There is a noooos ...



        and look- mmm ... amuuur
        Here is the look of a real wife
        1. +2
          27 February 2020 16: 05
          I don’t argue, the upper one looks mature
          but the bottom has its own type, although another
          Two worlds - two Lin Tsai! smile
          hi
        2. +5
          27 February 2020 16: 06
          On the topic I wanted to add ... The Chinese have a proverb- Stones of the past are steps of the future.
          This is to ensure that they have preserved traditions. And they kept them in awe. And they deprived us. And the same sovereignty. For the country, this is the basis of everything.
      3. 0
        27 February 2020 16: 11
        There are values ​​when ideology is secondary.
  28. +2
    27 February 2020 22: 41
    Well let’s say so, the Chinese Communist Party is only by name. And they have the same communism
  29. +1
    28 February 2020 07: 40
    “Are we going the right way?”
    - Yes! To a brighter future! - answered Susanin to the Poles.
    laughing
  30. -2
    28 February 2020 12: 40
    India is an independent country and China is an American factory. As soon as this very "Chinese proletariat" rises, acquires "self-consciousness", there will be a tryndet to all "development". At best, American entrepreneurs will leave China, plunging the world into shortages of goods, etc. (but this is only for the first time), in the worst case, China will face a series of internal and external conflicts similar to those taking place today on the territory of the former USSR.
  31. 0
    28 February 2020 14: 17
    Over the past twenty years, more than twenty thousand hospitals have been built in the People's Republic of China.
    !!!
  32. +1
    2 March 2020 18: 33
    A pretty girl in a red dress doesn't know what she's talking about. And that's okay. Her childish reasons seem obvious to her. China is the world champion in forcing its people to do what the leader says. So China chatted several times in the 20th century alone. Now the girl thinks that China has embarked on a path of progressive development, from which she will never deviate. But from the state in which India is now, China is separated by only a few decades and the American market specially opened for it. It is also very silly to compare the two systems according to one single criterion - the declared name (socialism / capitalism). Firstly, completely different and different entities can be hidden behind the name. Secondly, there are tens, if not hundreds, of the criteria determining the development of the state, not the last of which is generally religious. Take Russia 1990-2000 and Putin's. We did not change the course, we did not return to the USSR. But the country is completely different. Or take Marx and classical socialism. Ownership of the means of production is strictly prohibited there. This is almost his main economic postulate, which was strictly observed in the USSR. And where is that in modern China? The Russian reader has long grown out of this kind of "analyst" like this girl's.
  33. 0
    4 March 2020 15: 51
    What is there to say.
    From the window I see a Chinese city. They went forward as far from us as we were from them in 1957.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"