Military Review

The dates of launching of the fourth patrol ship of project 22160

63
The dates of launching of the fourth patrol ship of project 22160

The lead ship of project 22160 Vasily Bykov


The fourth patrol ship of project 22160 and the third serial "Sergey Kotov" will be launched in September this year. This was reported by the representative of the Zelenodolsk shipyard named after A.M. Gorky.

Answering a corresponding question from journalists, a representative of Zelenodolsky Shipyard stated that the deadline for launching the third serial ship of project 22160 "Sergey Kotov" is September 2020. Currently, the ship is being built at the Kerch Shipyard.

The new patrol ship was named in honor of the Hero of the Soviet Union, a participant in the defense of Odessa and Sevastopol, the liberation of Rear Admiral Sergei Kotov and Novorossiysk and Crimea.

The lead patrol ship of the project "Vasily Bykov" was introduced into the Black Sea fleet December 20, 2018. The first serial ship of project 22160, Dmitry Rogachev, joined the Black Sea Fleet on June 11, 2019. The third ship of the series and the second serial “Pavel Derzhavin” was launched on February 21, 2019 in Kerch, where it is being completed afloat. The fourth and fifth serial patrol ships Victor the Great and Nikolai Sipyagin are being built in Zelenodolsk. All ships are designed for the Black Sea Fleet.

The construction of the entire series of these ships was delayed due to import substitution of the power plant. All ships of the series, except for the head Vasily Bykov, on which the German MAN diesel gear units are installed, receive diesel gear units manufactured by the Kolomensky Zavod.

Project 22160 patrol ship (corvette) has a displacement of 1700 tons and is capable of speeds up to 30 knots. Cruising range - 6000 miles, autonomy - 60 days. The crew is 80 people. On board, the Ka-27PS helicopter is based. As standard weapons, the corvettes are equipped with a 76-mm artillery mount, anti-aircraft missile system and machine guns. A place is provided for the placement of various modules (RCC, missiles, electronic warfare, etc.), depending on the tasks performed.
Photos used:
https://balabin-1712.livejournal.com/
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. vkl.47
    vkl.47 26 February 2020 15: 44 New
    0
    The bridge will go to guard the Crimean.
    1. 210ox
      210ox 26 February 2020 15: 50 New
      +2
      On the Black Sea, a lot of things need to be protected from "playful hands of partners" and horses.
      1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
        Nikolay Ivanov_5 26 February 2020 20: 58 New
        0
        In the Black Sea, especially a lot of things need to be protected from skakuas.
    2. g1v2
      g1v2 26 February 2020 16: 43 New
      +8
      Will go to Tartus and to the shores of Africa. The Crimean bridge is guarded by the Federal Guard and the FSB Coast Guard.
      1. cost
        cost 26 February 2020 17: 08 New
        12
        The new patrol ship was named in honor of the Hero of the Soviet Union, a participant in the defense of Odessa and Sevastopol, the liberation of Rear Admiral Sergei Kotov and Novorossiysk and Crimea.

        Kotov Sergey Nikolaevich

        Sergei Kotov was born on October 1, 1912 in the city of Kozlov (now Michurinsk, Tambov Region). In September 1933 he was called up for service in the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Fleet. In 1937, Kotov graduated from the Naval College named after M.V. Frunze. At first he was sent to serve on the submarines of the Black Sea Fleet and served there as the commander of the steering group. But in December of the same year he was transferred to the division of the torpedo boats of the fleet and was appointed commander of the boat link. Since July 1941 - on the fronts of the Great Patriotic War, the whole war took place on the Black Sea Fleet. He commanded a link, from August 1942 - a detachment, from September 1942 - a division of torpedo boats of the 1st brigade of torpedo boats of the Black Sea Fleet. He participated in the defense of Odessa, in the defense of Sevastopol, in the Kerch-Feodosia landing operation, in the battle for the Caucasus, in the Novorossiysk-Taman, Kerch-Eltigen landing, Crimean, Iasi-Kishinev offensive operations. The division’s sailors rescued about 350 people at sea, sunk 2 vehicles, 4 landing barges, 1 patrol boat and shot down 3 enemy aircraft [1]. with his personal participation, during a raid on Dvuyakornaya bay, a barge with German tanks was sunk in 1942. Kotov landed on the "Small Earth" and then, under fire, provided him with ammunition and food supplies
        By May 1945 he personally made 156 military campaigns. Kotov’s division attacked the enemy’s bases and communications, escorted 198 transports, carried patrols, conducted minefields (about 200 sea mines were fired), landed troops. By order of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of May 16, 1944 for “courage and heroism shown in battles "captain-lieutenant Sergey Kotov was awarded the high title of Hero of the Soviet Union with the award of the Order of Lenin and the Gold Star medal number 3796

        After the war, Kotov continued to serve in the Soviet Navy. Since December 1946 he was the chief of staff of the 1st Sevastopol brigade of torpedo boats. Since August 1950, he was at the disposal of the Naval General Staff and trained Chinese sailors on a long official business trip in the People’s Republic of China. Since February 1952, he served as the head of the 232nd Navy Test Site in Feodosia. In September 1970, Rear Admiral S. N. Kotov resigned due to illness. He lived in Feodosia, worked as a senior engineer in the department of the chief designer at the Feodosia branch of the Novator ICB, participating in tests of missile systems.
        He was awarded the honorary title of "Honorary Citizen of Feodosia."
        He died on October 16, 1999, is buried in the New Cemetery of Feodosia.
        1. bessonov932
          bessonov932 26 February 2020 20: 28 New
          +2
          Thanks for the info!
      2. Astra wild
        Astra wild 26 February 2020 18: 06 New
        0
        Actually, the Crimean bridge needs cover from the sea, or some of them get mad from the word "bridge". Just to "calm them down" and need similar
  2. Thrifty
    Thrifty 26 February 2020 15: 46 New
    -6
    There would still be such pieces for the Baltic but with more serious weapons. Is there a hangar for a helicopter, or is it just aft?
    1. 210ox
      210ox 26 February 2020 15: 52 New
      0
      Various weapons are provided there in a container arrangement.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 26 February 2020 16: 25 New
        +9
        Quote: 210ox
        Various weapons are provided there in a container arrangement.

        Yeah ... but except for the diving container, everything else is only on paper. Yes, and the bow seat for the SAM module on ships ordered by the fleet is occupied by residential and domestic premises. sad
        1. Foxnova
          Foxnova 26 February 2020 21: 50 New
          0
          Gym
        2. Romario_Argo
          Romario_Argo 26 February 2020 22: 35 New
          0
          on the Star in the military acceptance of the film was. there the assault boat goes in an inclined dock.
      2. Alex 2020
        Alex 2020 26 February 2020 16: 53 New
        13
        Are weapons modules available or only in the project and on paper? Well, except for the Minotavr-ISPN-M.2 container hydroacoustic station, which is currently being tested. The ship's impact armament in container design is two 40-foot containers with eight Caliber-K missiles or 16 Kh-35U Uranus missiles "in four 20-foot containers. But then the helicopter has no place to shove. JSC "Severnoye PKB" envisages the installation of additional armament for two vertical launchers of the Shtil-1 air defense missile system for 24 anti-aircraft missiles, but where and instead of what? In general, as a ship for carrying the border patrol service will come down. But as a real combat unit ... not seriously.
  3. Ngauro
    Ngauro 26 February 2020 15: 49 New
    -4
    absolutely useless unit, drive the current of pirates to him
    1. 210ox
      210ox 26 February 2020 15: 53 New
      -3
      Why is it useless, justify.
      1. Whalebone
        Whalebone 26 February 2020 16: 09 New
        +6
        And what is useful? It’s great to drive poachers, to fight about anything.
        1. 210ox
          210ox 26 February 2020 16: 18 New
          -5
          There is something to fight there. See specifications and weapons. Another thing is at what stage of readiness are all these containers with weapons.
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 26 February 2020 16: 32 New
            +9
            Quote: 210ox
            There is something to fight there. See specifications and weapons. Another thing is at what stage of readiness are all these containers with weapons.

            How can one fight by the fact that the Defense Ministry did not even order? No. I certainly understand that traditionally our ships even go to the Gos without a part of their armament (a clinical case - pr. 1155, and in pr. 941 SLBMs were received a year after the delivery of the main SSBN).
            But this patrol mutant (designed for the FSB), even after the delivery of the fleet, most of the modules are only at the sketching stage. Yes, and the naval distinguished themselves - the space for the 22160 air defense system module is already taken.
            PLO - only a helicopter. There is no normal GAS (the existing GAS is anti-sabotage, not anti-submarine, it was sacrificed with a range in the name of permission). Air defense - no (and will not - the place is taken). PKR / KR - no (container PU is only in the form of an exhibition layout).
            In fact, 22160 can only be used as a floating hangar for an PLO helicopter. But for this and "Herluf Bidstrup" will do. smile
        2. Sandor Clegane
          Sandor Clegane 26 February 2020 18: 07 New
          +3
          Quote: Whalebone
          And what is useful?

          I must admit that there is a benefit - it is patrolling off the coast of Somalia, because we have normal warships that work out their resources there, now these modular patrols will do it
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. Ngauro
        Ngauro 26 February 2020 16: 34 New
        0
        Suitcases without handles. Navy buys a series of useless ships
        https://topwar.ru/151455-chemodany-bez-ruchek-vmf-pokupaet-seriju-absoljutno-bespoleznyh-korablej.html
    2. Grits
      Grits 26 February 2020 15: 53 New
      -1
      Quote: NGAURO
      to drive a current of pirates to him

      So that's why everyone goes to the Black Sea
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 26 February 2020 17: 46 New
        +4
        Well, in general, yes. The boat is so necessary, but outdated. Classics, when it was hot, they ordered, when they built it - the irritant was gone.

        In the context of ensuring constant patrols in the far and ocean zones, these ships are extremely useful and necessary. Because - rank 1 BNK (and the other cash ones are useless for those tasks, because they do not have a helicopter, only two Baltic SKRs were able to participate normally not from rank 1) - they knocked out the resource at a wild pace, to complete this task.

        22160 is a relatively cheap and well-suited for such tasks. Well, perhaps, there is not enough dosed and safe firepower for the crew - for all the weapons, two MTPU columns - while the bourgeoisie use 20-30mm stabilized modules, with a multi-mode optical station and remote control. Roughly speaking, minimizing the risks of catching a stray bullet and maximum closeness to the factors of undermining a shahidkater at close range. However, here the customer, who likes to save on matches, rather wanted it.

        The trouble is that half of the series has already been built, the second is being completed, and the task for which they were designed and built has been removed from the current agenda.

        For the Black Sea, they are just not optimal. And on running opportunities. And the composition of weapons. Well, again, the main advantages:
        - A high level of comfort, supporting the necessary readiness on a long trip.
        - 60 days of autonomy in its reserves.
        - a dumped assault armored boat.
        - Well, and most importantly, an assignment to the Russian Navy. That is, any flea-shooter with the Navy / Turks / Georgians or by whom else, takes the conflict to a fundamentally different level than if the coast guard was engaged in this.

        For FM calls are not relevant. An ordinary firefly, will do better.
    3. lucul
      lucul 26 February 2020 17: 54 New
      0
      absolutely useless unit, drive the current of pirates to him

      That's why he was created - to chase pirates and poachers in our thermal waters. And the stealth design is here to help him. And for the fighting, we are already building corvettes ....
      1. Foxnova
        Foxnova 26 February 2020 21: 53 New
        +1
        Terriers here are occupied by border guards.

        The only thing that can be done with these mountain ships is to be repainted in white and blue and sent to the tof in frontier service
        1. lucul
          lucul 26 February 2020 21: 58 New
          +2
          The only thing you can do with these mountain ships

          He also carries the assault landing boat 02800, which he lowers / picks up on the go (!), And which develops 40 knots, despite the fact that he has full bulletproof protection and carries 10 marines on board.
          Everything is fine there - "zrady" did not work ...
          1. Foxnova
            Foxnova 27 February 2020 13: 17 New
            +1
            III will we take a boarding?
        2. Marconi41
          Marconi41 26 February 2020 23: 34 New
          0
          Quote: FoxNova
          Terriers here are occupied by border guards.

          The only thing that can be done with these mountain ships is to be repainted in white and blue and sent to the tof in frontier service

          Border guards have 22100 to do this.
          1. Foxnova
            Foxnova 27 February 2020 13: 19 New
            +1
            In the amount of 2 copies
            1. Marconi41
              Marconi41 27 February 2020 16: 49 New
              0
              Quote: FoxNova
              In the amount of 2 copies

              But imprisoned for them. Frontier guards do not need modularity and an armored boat.
              1. Foxnova
                Foxnova 27 February 2020 17: 57 New
                +1
                That's what a boat wouldn’t hurt them

                And in general, I'm looking for at least some adequate application of the miracle to parachutes
  4. Igor Borisov_2
    Igor Borisov_2 26 February 2020 15: 54 New
    -2
    Quote: Thrifty
    There would still be such pieces for the Baltic but with more serious weapons. Is there a hangar for a helicopter, or is it just aft?


    I agree to all 100% .... A helicopter most likely - only basing ...
    1. Foxnova
      Foxnova 26 February 2020 21: 53 New
      +1
      The hangar is only good
  5. Pavel57
    Pavel57 26 February 2020 15: 56 New
    +2
    The controversial ship with the concept of modular weapons. Pirates are no longer required to drive.
  6. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 26 February 2020 15: 58 New
    +2
    I continue to wonder and admire the modern design of the ships. Like with airplanes, probably, if the ship is beautiful, so it walks beautifully on the sea.
  7. rruvim
    rruvim 26 February 2020 16: 05 New
    +4
    Why would there be 80 crew members on a ship of this displacement? 40 people for each shift? For a long time the merchant fleet with the current computerization on ships with a deadweight of even 25000 - 30000 tons has crews of 15-17 people. Or are these patrol boats all manually? It seems to me that there should not be more than 10 watchmen "behind the eyes". 2-3 on the "bridge", 2-3 on the BIUS, 2-3 in the engine room and the cook with an assistant, 10 more are resting and awake, 10 are sleeping (they will jump up on alarm). 30 sailors and officers are more than enough. And here there are 80 people. For example, anxiety, but this crowd in this space, will interfere with each other.
    1. Dart2027
      Dart2027 26 February 2020 16: 13 New
      +2
      Quote: rruvim
      For a long time, the merchant fleet with the current computerization on ships with a deadweight of even 25000 - 30000 tons

      Because the lion's share of these thousands of tons is just a place for cargo, and warships are saturated with equipment.
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 26 February 2020 16: 16 New
        0
        But all the equipment on modern ships, including and on project 22160 combined into a BIUS. There are already no warhead posts.
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 26 February 2020 17: 56 New
          +1
          Quote: rruvim
          jointly in BIUS. Already no posts

          There are posts. Not as much as before, but there are.
    2. bk316
      bk316 26 February 2020 16: 14 New
      12
      Why do 80 crew members on a ship of such a displacement?

      And for nothing. He has a crew of 28 people laughing
      She can stand the paper, but then there’s an article without a signature ...
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 26 February 2020 16: 18 New
        +1
        Well, that's clear, but I already combed the "turnips" ... Too lazy to look at the characteristics on other sites.
    3. lucul
      lucul 26 February 2020 18: 23 New
      +1
      Why do 80 crew members on a ship of such a displacement? For each shift of 40 people?

      Actually the crew of the ship itself - 28 people.
      It can be expanded up to 80 people of additional crew - divers and more ...
  8. rudolff
    rudolff 26 February 2020 16: 18 New
    15
    The optimal solution would be to transfer all the ships of this project to the border guards for which it was originally developed and not to depict the replenishment of the Navy as absolutely useless units for the fleet. For border guards, this ship would have looked very good.
  9. Old bun
    Old bun 26 February 2020 16: 20 New
    0
    anti-aircraft missile system

    Directly surprised. Probably MANPADS mean.
    1. bk316
      bk316 26 February 2020 16: 59 New
      +3
      Probably MANPADS mean.

      Well, if you hold Bending in your hands, then MANPADS belay
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 26 February 2020 17: 47 New
        +2
        There is no Bending. There are AK-176 and two MTPU units. MANPADS in the arsenal.
        1. bk316
          bk316 26 February 2020 18: 15 New
          +1
          There is no Bending.

          Well, to be honest, I don’t see her in the photo either, but everywhere they write what is. Share links?
          1. donavi49
            donavi49 26 February 2020 18: 39 New
            +3
            He did not even have a bend in the project. This is flexible in 21631 (even two) wink .

            Here is the base model of 2013 with enhanced weapons. No bending


            Here is the ordered Navy in fact. No bending either. Everywhere 8 MANPADS Igla.

            1. bk316
              bk316 26 February 2020 19: 27 New
              -1
              I do not argue, but here.

              http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-789.html

              HERE SEE THE PRODUCER SITE
              http://www.severnoe.com/proposals/naval/22160/
              Usually this is where you need to look.


              What am I misunderstanding? Perhaps they were going to put the bending into the module? She easily breaks in ...
  10. lopuhan2006
    lopuhan2006 26 February 2020 16: 57 New
    +3
    It is imperative to put next to the one who designed this "ship", the one who ordered with such characteristics, the one who approved the project from the Navy and with the names, and let them report to the microphone and explain the reasons. And then all the oars in the PKiO in Magadan.
    1. rudolff
      rudolff 26 February 2020 17: 10 New
      +6
      It was developed for the border guards and for them it’s quite a normal ship. But the one who actually ordered a series of these ships for the Navy can be brought to trial.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 26 February 2020 17: 56 New
      +3
      Well, and those who brought, but in fact destroyed (6 years "under repair" and another 2,5 years there according to optimistic plans) the newest BNK 1 rank in the Russian Navy today, to reward this?


      In fact - the party said it is necessary to ensure a permanent presence in the Gulf of Aden. The Russian Navy replied - yes. And he began to provide. Since there were no such ships (with normal seaworthiness, autonomy, and a helicopter) - they drove there BOD, Cruiser, SKRy (the Undaunted also died and can only be restored by the end of the year - 6 years in repair).

      The Navy figured that if this goes on, then rank 1 BNK will die and there will be nothing at all to send to the far zone. And they intercepted this project from the border guards. Here. Only the pirates also decided that they would make the Islamic revolution in Africa even more profitable and were re-qualified as broads (well, there all kinds of NGOs started paying money, for fishing, subsidies, etc. Plus, they began to go on PMC ships, which pirates = is not only business, as well as the expected safari.Some PMCs / businessmen, it seems, even tried to hire bandits to portray attacks, so that the shipowner prolongs the contract for another month, during sunset of the business).
      1. rudolff
        rudolff 26 February 2020 18: 20 New
        +4
        No need to speculate cause and effect, donavi. Ships in this condition due to the lack of all types of scheduled repairs and proper maintenance, and not because in what century a long trip happened. Ships and should not climb out of the campaigns, with the exception of the time for repairs and VTG. I can also show you pictures of my boats, which are already ten years old waiting for repairs and repairs. So, those who exploited them, who do not save the resource, who did not extend the overhaul time for one place for another couple of years, are to blame? If we do not learn how to properly operate the fleet, we better not build new ships at all. And these patrolmen are just dust in the eyes.
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 26 February 2020 18: 42 New
          0
          Well, one thing, another.

          If there was no extra load. They would drop out by technical condition less often and as a result, enterprises would at least cope with repairs. That one time at the Pacific Fleet - there were 3 dead BODs under repair and one conditionally alive. Just under the sunset of a permanent presence in Aden.

          The repair base simply did not take out such a volume of work. The usual pace - +/- exported, if without excesses, when the Navy wants to finish, but does not know how and for what money.
        2. Bashkirkhan
          Bashkirkhan 26 February 2020 18: 47 New
          +1
          That is, in order to ensure reliable and long-term operation, it is necessary to undergo timely repair work (according to the regulations), including average repair, which many ships have not passed, but are being repaired in fact for VTG. Project 1155 BODs go to BS more and longer than anyone else.
    3. Foxnova
      Foxnova 27 February 2020 13: 20 New
      0
      Comrade Korolev, the former Commander-in-Chief of the Navy who is now located, you will not believe at Zelenodolsk Plant
      1. lopuhan2006
        lopuhan2006 27 February 2020 14: 42 New
        0
        As I understand it: whoever pushed through is still releasing this project?
        1. Foxnova
          Foxnova 27 February 2020 14: 45 New
          0
          That is how

          Therefore, only border guards and not to disgrace the Navy
  11. antivirus
    antivirus 26 February 2020 19: 20 New
    -2
    who eats with his hands from a plate or from a leaf of burdock - do not read ------ another small spoon into the bottomless barrel of power of Russia
  12. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 26 February 2020 19: 48 New
    +4
    Kolomensky engine-building, many human thanks.
    If you still (if possible) expand the product range, then it would be generally from the heart! ...
    And we would ask to testify our assurances, in the utmost respect for them.
  13. 7,62h54
    7,62h54 26 February 2020 22: 26 New
    0
    If only the timing of the descent had not shifted to the right due to the Chinese infection. And then how do not you dig that the thread from heaven is used.
  14. Connor MacLeod
    Connor MacLeod 27 February 2020 02: 04 New
    -1
    It has a displacement of almost 20380. what Really, there is nowhere else to put money. fool
  15. musorg
    musorg 27 February 2020 12: 18 New
    0
    Earlier we wrote about "Vasily Kotov" and what has changed?
  16. lopuhan2006
    lopuhan2006 27 February 2020 15: 00 New
    0
    Quote: FoxNova
    That is how

    Therefore, only border guards and not to disgrace the Navy

    Nda. Initially, it was clear that the border guards were taken away according to their needs, but in any case, this ship can hardly be called a ship) A sad story was drawn with them. How selfish interests can take away for many years the possibility of updating the whole Fleet .....