The dates for signing the contract for the construction of two APRKSN "Borey-A"

50
The dates for signing the contract for the construction of two APRKSN "Borey-A"

A contract for the construction of two new project 955A nuclear missile strategic submarine cruisers (code Borey-A) for the Russian Navy will be concluded in August this year at the Army 2020 forum, TASS reports citing a source in the military-industrial complex.

It was decided to sign in August at the Army 2020 forum a construction contract for fleet two more submarine missile carriers Borey-A. Under the terms of the contract, the laying of both ships will take place at Sevmash (part of the USC) in 2021, they will be built as part of the current state armament program until 2027

- said the source of the agency, adding that these submarines will be the ninth and tenth in a row submarines of the Borey class.



Earlier, RIA News with reference to its source, it was reported that the laying of two APRKSN "Borey-A" will be held on May 9, 2020 in honor of the 75th anniversary of the Great Victory.

In turn, the Ministry of Defense does not comment on the information voiced by news agencies.

Currently, the Russian Navy is serving three nuclear missile submarines of the 955 (Borey) project of the 4 generation — the strategic missile cruisers Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh. He graduated from state tests and is preparing to join the fleet of the APKSN "Prince Vladimir" of the modernized project "Borey-A".

Four more serial ARPKSN of the 955 project are under construction - “Prince Oleg” (officially laid down on 27 of July 2014 of the year), “Generalissimo Suvorov” (laid on 26 of December 2014 of the year), “Emperor Alexander III” (laid down on 18 of December 2015 of the year) and “ Prince Pozharsky "(laid down December 23 2016 years).
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    50 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      25 February 2020 12: 29
      It is necessary to update the submelt. Good news.
      1. +3
        25 February 2020 12: 49
        It is necessary but not APRKSN and MAPL .. And with this, we are tight to planting (((
        1. +5
          25 February 2020 12: 55
          I fully support your opinion!
          From the "menagerie" horns and legs remained, "Ash" - to the right, and their planned number is not enough
          1. -2
            25 February 2020 12: 59
            Duck himself, while fishing (went out for the flounder), Elk saw in Okhotsk, was in a positional position. My jaw dropped to the bottom. And there’s nothing to drive them
            1. -1
              25 February 2020 13: 25
              This is not news, unfortunately. What do you think, why did he need to go precisely on the surface?
            2. -4
              25 February 2020 13: 49
              Quote: Nehist
              Duck himself, while fishing (went out for the flounder), Elk saw in Okhotsk, was in a positional position. My jaw dropped to the bottom. And there’s nothing to drive them

              Wow! And how did they let him through the straits? What a disgrace ...
              This is similar if our BDRM were walking in Labrador.
              1. 0
                25 February 2020 14: 51
                Quote: Gritsa
                Wow! And how did they let him through the straits?

                When, whom, through which straits did they pass into the Sea of ​​Okhotsk? fool
                1. -3
                  25 February 2020 15: 38
                  Quote: Piramidon
                  When, whom, through which straits did they pass into the Sea of ​​Okhotsk?

                  see above.
              2. +9
                25 February 2020 15: 28
                So here, it seems, a recent article was - where whose fleet is rummaging around.

                Blue - Russian
                Green - Americans
                Red - Chinese

                There is a big question - who is the master in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk.
                1. -2
                  25 February 2020 15: 35
                  Quote: kit88
                  There is a big question - who is the master in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk

                  Strange map. It is surprising to me that the Americans in Okhotsk are at home (although, in the absence of our surface fleet, everything is quite possible). But the Chinese ... For the first time I hear about this. After all, this is the sea in which the deployment and combat alert of our SSBNs takes place.
                  And the fact that the Chinese are in full force in the Chukchi Sea right up to about. Wrangel is generally from the realm of fantasy. I do not believe.
                2. +2
                  25 February 2020 17: 42
                  Green - Americans

                  Undersea Cables (green) are submarine cables. Alexander, be careful. I didn’t set a minus if they suddenly get it.hi
                  1. +7
                    25 February 2020 20: 00
                    Yes, I agree. Inattention.
                    Yes, in general, I only know "Hyundai Hoh" and "caliper" in English. request
                    Pentagon map, marked Russian and Chinese. .... and for some reason cables.
                    Original taken here
                    https://topwar.ru/167773-pentagon-opublikoval-kartu-morskih-ugroz-ssha-ot-rossii-i-kitaja.html
                    1. +2
                      25 February 2020 20: 09
                      and for some reason cables

                      The Pentagon tried to prove that our people and the Chinese have the ability to connect to them.
                      1. +8
                        25 February 2020 20: 15
                        Well, how warm, thanks for the card, we will know where to connect, am
                        belay
            3. +2
              25 February 2020 20: 23
              Quote: Nehist
              Duck himself, while fishing (went out for the flounder), Elk saw in Okhotsk, was in a positional position.

              You, probably, on channel 16 informed SNIS about your discovery by repeating the feat of Exupery !? Or, in violation of the holy rules for the assembly of small vessels, you did not have a VHF radio station?
              Are you going to flounder to go to flounder? belay
              And how did you visually determine, on the retractable fence, the boat in the positional position that it was from a moose herd?
              Quote: Nehist
              My jaw dropped to the bottom.
              In no case do not lift it back - let it stay there! laughing
          2. 0
            25 February 2020 16: 27
            Well, tell the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, he is apparently not in the know. soldier
            1. +1
              25 February 2020 20: 46
              Quote: Ros 56
              Well, tell the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, he is apparently not in the know.

              Usually they are silent about fakes ... This case is an exception!
              Personally, I doubt very much that the submarine commander violated the requirements of the fundamental rule of secrecy for carrying BS and unreasonably surfaced.
              Secondly, this is an extremely unstable position of submarines, which tend to go as quickly as possible. And you can also determine under the retractable, without protruding outward ...
              1. 0
                26 February 2020 08: 10
                What are you talking about, I'm talking about Thomas, and you're talking about Yeryoma. fool
          3. 0
            27 February 2020 02: 54
            Quote: Siberian barber
            I fully support your opinion!
            From the "menagerie" horns and legs remained, " Ash "- to the right, and their planned number is not enough

            It is not clear at all why there are as many as 9 of them? Ash is a great option to replace the 949 project (ammunition is increased by a third with half the displacement), but as an escort for the Boreas, the 885ths are too bulky (compared to Virginia, Barakuda and Astyut).

            Enough and 6 Ash, and all the freed up resources should be directed to quickly bring to mind and launch the series "Like". That's 845th need 12 pieces at least, silent killers with a displacement half that of Ash, so that Borey could cover and Ash, and work as part of the KUG.
        2. +2
          25 February 2020 14: 05
          Quote: Nehist
          It is necessary but not APRKSN and MAPL .. And with this, we are tight to planting (((

          If "Armageddon" takes place, IALP will no longer be needed. But for a retaliatory strike, APRKSN could not come in handy.
          PS True, we will not find out about this and we will not care.
          1. +3
            25 February 2020 14: 44
            Again it is necessary to "turn on the old record")))
            In order for the SSBNs to inflict this blow, they need PLA!
            How to cover strategists?)
          2. 0
            25 February 2020 15: 47
            From what? Now, if I come to my parents in the village, I think I’ll stretch at least a month, well, there are pickles and jams. Anyway, the point is to hit the Smolensk region ??? Unless a maximum of 2 puffs will be lowered on Smolensk itself and one by one to Vyazma (there are helicopters based there), Yelnya, well, they may decide to go for a nuclear power plant in Desnogorsk (but it’s already quite dirty), and why not give out the rest.
        3. 0
          25 February 2020 20: 12
          Quote: Nehist
          not APRKSN and MAPL.

          Is there anyone, I'm ignorant, to cheat the abbreviation APRKSN (strategic nuclear submarine missile cruiser)? "Ash"; "Poplar"; "Buk" - I understand, but there are no such abbreviation puzzles. Why do you need a stock of letters, confuse the enemy, or get confused yourself?
          1. 0
            25 February 2020 20: 26
            APRSC
            - I forgot to mention, the article says "APRSKN" - however, the journalist got confused in the letters wassat
      2. +2
        25 February 2020 14: 40
        Yes, the good news!
        A dozen Boreyevs is one hundred and sixty Bulava missiles, and it’s scary to imagine how many warheads.
        Some of these underwater cruisers can incinerate Matrasia to zero, but there are also Voivode, Sarmatians, Poplars and, I hope, Poseidons ...
        In striped - a reason to think! wink
    2. +5
      25 February 2020 12: 32
      Is it possible to depart from the habit of confining everything to a particular holiday, and just, take tomorrow and sign this contract right tomorrow? What to expect for half a year from the sky of stones?
      1. 0
        25 February 2020 14: 11
        Quote: Thrifty
        Is it possible to depart from the habit of confining everything to a particular holiday, and just, take tomorrow and sign this contract right tomorrow? What to expect for half a year from the sky of stones?

        Think narrowly. When something is timed to date - it sounds more solid and draws more attention to the same Western media. This is one of the elements of information war. hi
    3. -2
      25 February 2020 12: 34
      This is all good. But at least a couple of destroyers would be, that would be a joy.

      By the way, explain. To strike under the rules, the boat must go to some point, which is why they say that the Americans graze and destroy. But technically this exit to the point is regulated only for safety. So then she can shoot back from the bay, if it impinges.
      1. +1
        25 February 2020 12: 44
        Quote: RideMaster
        This is all good. But at least a couple of destroyers would be, that would be a joy.

        To do this, you must first develop and lay the head one. And this is at least 10 years.
        Quote: RideMaster
        So then she can shoot back from the bay, if it impinges.

        Maybe, but ... what is more likely to shoot from 2 km from a gun or when the barrel is stuck in the temple?
        1. 0
          25 February 2020 17: 49
          The headquarters will soon be surrendered to the fleet. A mace was already allowed out of it. And even left normally ...
          1. 0
            25 February 2020 23: 34
            Quote: Dzafdet
            The headquarters will soon be surrendered to the fleet.

            I'm talking about the head Super-Pots. He is a purebred destroyer without reservations, and even so far he is not really on the paper in the project.
            Quote: Dzafdet
            A mace was already let out of it

            From whom? From Borea-A? The man asked above why to bring the SSBN to the launch point, if it could be fired from the pier. I explained on my fingers why this is so. And then, the Mace with its range of 8 thousand is not Sineva with a range of 11 thousand. Do you feel the difference?
            1. 0
              26 February 2020 10: 26
              I feel it. That's why 4 boats will serve in the Pacific Ocean. There, even from the pier they will be able to send gifts to Uncle Sam for Christmas and beyond. And two years ago, Solomonov said something casually about Mace-M. Apparently they set the task to give birth to a missile with a greater MO or greater range ..
      2. +3
        25 February 2020 12: 48
        Technically it can, but it will only be a very good target itself. And even before their shooting, therefore, they go out to the launch area (preferably without shepherds).
      3. +2
        25 February 2020 19: 27
        By the way, explain. To strike under the rules, the boat must go to some point, which is why they say that the Americans graze and destroy. But technically this exit to the point is regulated only for safety. So then she can shoot back from the bay, if it impinges.


        "Strategist" secretly carries out combat service in a certain area. When a launch command is received, it conducts preparatory measures and fires. There is no need to go to any points.

        Location of deployment areas is a state secret. They are also cut according to the principle of the impossibility of mutual detection by friendly forces.

        While en route to combat service in the deployment area, our SSBNs are on guard at the exit from the base by "partner" nuclear submarines in order to carry out long-term covert tracking. This is done in the interests of opening combat patrol areas, practicing combat training tasks, for immediate destruction in the event of combat launches, etc. ...

        Technically, the SSBN can also shoot from the pier, if the range allows. When in the base, all SSBNs are on alert and are ready to use weapons if ordered.
    4. +3
      25 February 2020 12: 40
      The dates for signing the contract for the construction of two APRKSN "Borey-A"
      Well, they won’t be superfluous !!! good Fleets be !!!
    5. -1
      25 February 2020 13: 05
      The contract for the construction for the Russian Navy of two new atomic missile strategic submarine cruisers of the project 955A (code "Borey-A") will be concluded in August this year at the forum "Army-2020"
      And by March 8, MAY 1, MAY 9, no way? That is bad luck. requestand happiness was so possible. Six months to the tail, workers. There is an opinion and solution, but a banquet in August.
    6. +1
      25 February 2020 13: 16
      So the boats of the 2020 contract should become not 9 and 10, but 11 and 12 .... The ninth and tenth should be the boats of the contract signed at the "Army 2019" and which will be laid this May .. It seems so ..
    7. 0
      25 February 2020 13: 57
      Life is getting better! Previously, they announced a possible deadline. Now about the conclusion of the contract. And what if you suddenly sign this contract when in operation? In 2050?
      1. +1
        25 February 2020 21: 16
        Quote: Gardamir
        when in operation? In 2050?

        According to the plan in 2027 ... But how it goes - we will see ...
    8. +3
      25 February 2020 14: 19
      Quote: RideMaster
      By the way, explain. To strike under the rules, the boat must go to some point, which is why they say that the Americans graze and destroy. But technically this exit to the point is regulated only for safety. So then she can shoot back from the bay, if it impinges.

      This point may be at the pier.
      1. -1
        25 February 2020 16: 28
        Quote: Old26
        This point may be at the pier.

        In the version of the carrier Dolphin with Sineva, given the range of this ICBM, it’s not so good in the variant of Borea with the Bulava, which has a range of 3 thousand less. In vain, the BARK was buried.
    9. 0
      25 February 2020 15: 36
      I’m looking at START 3, no one is looking) "Superfluous" are already beginning to be laid. Now everyone will put pressure on China, let's say to us, without you in any way) In principle, right. APRKSN are designed to serve for long periods, and then you look and MAPL will arrive in time, for which know-how will be more important. In the meantime, diesel-electric submarines and surface forces will provide an exit. Fortunately, information for the Pacific Fleet begins to emerge. 6 pcs. 636 and 10 additional 380s just confirm this. So, for 15 years the Pacific Fleet will be the same as it is now, those are not quite oceanic.
    10. +2
      25 February 2020 16: 39
      Quote: lopuhan2006
      I’m looking at START 3, no one is looking) "Superfluous" are already beginning to be laid.

      Why doesn’t anyone look and why did they start laying extra ones? We have in service one boat of the BDR project with the age of 38 years. Two were decommissioned last year.
      Now under construction are 8 boats. In total, there are now 10 missile, taking into account boats of the BDR and BDRM type. That is 160 missiles. The oldest of them is 38 years old this year (BDR). The rest are from 30 to 36 years old. Old boats of the BDR and BDRM projects will be decommissioned gradually and replaced with new ones.
      In addition, START-3 does not have ceilings for specific systems. That is, the number of ICBMs, the number of SLBMs and strategic aircraft is not specified. There are only total restrictions on the number of deployed (deployed and not deployed) carriers and the number of warheads

      Quote: lopuhan2006
      Now everyone will put pressure on China, let’s say to us, without you in any way) In principle, right.

      As they say in China, "where you sit, there you get off." The very American idea of ​​signing under the treaty the countries possessing nuclear weapons, and above all China, will lead nowhere. No basis for compromise
    11. +4
      25 February 2020 16: 42
      Quote: NEXUS
      Quote: Old26
      This point may be at the pier.

      In the version of the carrier Dolphin with Sineva, given the range of this ICBM, it’s not so good in the variant of Borea with the Bulava, which has a range of 3 thousand less. In vain, the BARK was buried.


      Why is the Bulava's range suddenly 3 thousand kilometers shorter? They are roughly equal to that of Bulava and Sineva ...
      1. 0
        25 February 2020 17: 51
        Approximately, it’s like in a joke: somewhere 7, somewhere 8 ... Mace -9300 km, Sineva-Liner-11534 km ... How would the difference of 2000 km ...
    12. 0
      25 February 2020 16: 49
      In total, 12-14 Boreev are needed, because old projects are not eternal, and will soon have to be written off. In addition, from 12-14, 1-2 will always be under repair / modernization / maintenance, so 12-14 is the optimal number

      Well, I would also like at least a couple, and preferably 4 Boreev-K strike, to the eyeballs loaded with a couple of hundreds of conventional (or maybe part of the nuclear) cruise missiles Caliber, or even Zircon
    13. +1
      25 February 2020 21: 03
      Quote: Dzafdet
      Approximately, it’s like in a joke: somewhere 7, somewhere 8 ... Mace -9300 km, Sineva-Liner-11534 km ... How would the difference of 2000 km ...

      Sergei! Sineva / Liner, like Trident at 11 with a penny of thousands of kilometers, were launched with truncated military equipment. With one warhead. At one time, the P-39 was launched at the same range once or twice. With 2 blocks.
      The only difference is that the Bulava has 9300 with its standard combat equipment, and the Sineva has one unit. And so the ranges are approximately equal. The "Sineva" has a standard either 8300 or 8800 km (there are both those and other figures for the range

      Quote: Imperial Technocrat
      In total, 12-14 Boreev are needed, because old projects are not eternal, and will soon have to be written off. In addition, from 12-14, 1-2 will always be under repair / modernization / maintenance, so 12-14 is the optimal number

      Well, I would also like at least a couple, and preferably 4 Boreev-K strike, to the eyeballs loaded with a couple of hundreds of conventional (or maybe part of the nuclear) cruise missiles Caliber, or even Zircon

      10 Boreyevs will be enough. 160 missiles is a pretty decent figure.

      "Boreyev-K" even if built, the figure flashed in 2 buildings. The number of "Calibers" she will be able to carry about 128. "Onyx" - 64. How many "Zircons" - HZ. To do this, you need at least know its diameter
      1. 0
        26 February 2020 10: 29
        The mace was launched at maximum range, also with two BBs. So its range with a full load of 8 thousand km .. Miracles do not happen.
    14. 0
      26 February 2020 00: 52
      if one day when mooring I’ll goose off me!
    15. 0
      26 February 2020 00: 55
      Quote: Imperial Technocrat
      In total, 12-14 Boreev are needed, because old projects are not eternal, and will soon have to be written off. In addition, from 12-14, 1-2 will always be under repair / modernization / maintenance, so 12-14 is the optimal number

      Well, I would also like at least a couple, and preferably 4 Boreev-K strike, to the eyeballs loaded with a couple of hundreds of conventional (or maybe part of the nuclear) cruise missiles Caliber, or even Zircon

      I just heard about borey-b

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"