The updated Constitution of Russia will force to close the Kuril issue: there are doubts


If the Constitution of the Russian Federation contains a provision prohibiting the alienation of lands, Japan's hopes for the return of the South Kuril Islands will finally become illusory. The updated Constitution (if amendments are adopted and supported) will force to close the Kuril issue. Is it so?


For Tokyo, the very Kuril issue since the end of World War II is one of the most painful. Japan still considers the islands to be its own, and the current Prime Minister Shinzo Abe once vowed the spirit of his father to return the South Kuril Islands. It is the territorial dispute over the Kuril Islands that is the main reason that a peace treaty has not yet been signed between Russia and Japan.

Most Japanese publications demonstrate an uncompromising attitude in this matter.

Our line should be this: a peace treaty can be signed between the two countries only after solving the issue of the return of all four "northern islands" of Japan,

- writes, for example, the publication Hokkaido Shimbun.

By the way, even without a peace treaty, countries successfully trade with each other and interact at the highest level. Relations between Russia and Japan are generally developing quite well, but the Kuril issue still remains a stumbling block between the states. Moscow is well aware that Japan is the closest US ally in the Asia-Pacific region and the establishment of control over the South Kuril Islands will definitely lead to increased risks to the national security of our country. After all, the United States will have the opportunity to move closer to our Far East.


With the position of the Japanese side, everything is clear. For her, the return of the islands of Habomai, Iturup, Kunashir and Shikotan is a matter of national prestige. But in Russia for almost three decades of post-Soviet stories more than once some politicians and ordinary citizens have been talking about the possible return of the South Kuril Islands. Like, Russian-Japanese relations will benefit from this, and even the inhabitants of the islands themselves, who supposedly find themselves in much better conditions, will increase their standard of living.

But the opinion of most of our fellow citizens, of course, is unambiguous: you cannot give an inch of land to the Japanese, even if they "pay with gold." Indeed, for the South Kuril Islands, including, our soldiers and officers died in battles with the Japanese army.

If the amendment, which actor and director Vladimir Mashkov spoke at the meeting with the president, is adopted in the Constitution, the issue of the South Kuril Islands’ membership will be closed forever. At least for Russia. To transfer the islands of Japan, you have to change the Constitution. And the incumbent head of state will not do this, knowing full well that his rating in this case will rapidly fly down. Indeed, foreign policy is one of the few areas for the actions of the Russian authorities in which at least it is not a shame.

In Japan itself, they can only respond to an amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in the information space. A few indignant statements from Japanese dignitaries, a series of stories and articles in the media, several rallies of Japanese nationalists at the Russian embassy in Tokyo - that, in fact, is the whole reaction of the Japanese side that can be expected in this case. The Country of the Rising Sun does not possess military potential comparable with the Russian one, and it will not be involved in adventures for the sake of several islands. Trade relations between states are unlikely to suffer.

Now trade with Russia brings Japan much greater benefits than what can be obtained from the entry of the South Kuril Islands into the empire. Russia is a huge market for the sale of Japanese products, a supplier of many resources, finally one of its closest neighbors, which, moreover, can serve as an intermediary in complex relations with China and the DPRK. And the Japanese leadership will not spoil existing relations, disrupt existing ties over the South Kuril Islands.

For Japan, it’s now profitable to continue trying to convince Vladimir Putin to give up at least part of the territories claimed by Tokyo in exchange for investment in the Russian economy. For example, Sergei Lavrov, speaking at the Territory of Meanings forum in August 2019, allowed the opportunity to discuss the transfer of the Habomai and Shikotan islands "in exchange for concluding a peace treaty and Japan's official recognition of Russia's sovereignty over the Kuril Islands." It turns out that the Russian leaders themselves do not yet have a tough and clear position on the South Kuril Islands, and it is precisely this fact that the Japanese will try to take advantage of in the near future. Because so far there are more questions than answers, and doubts remain also in connection with the position of the authorities mentioned above.
Author:
Photos used:
VK / Elena Zanina
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

161 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. snifer 24 February 2020 11: 15 New
    • 24
    • 21
    +3
    The king said negotiations are ongoing with partners, so ...
    1. Sling cutter 24 February 2020 11: 27 New
      • 30
      • 12
      +18
      Quote: snifer
      The king said negotiations are ongoing with partners, so ...

      Gorbach also talked a lot, and everyone knows what came of it.
      1. Svarog 24 February 2020 11: 36 New
        • 59
        • 21
        +38
        Quote: Stroporez
        And the current head of state will not do this, knowing full well that his rating in this case will rapidly fly down


        We have raised the retirement age, and now I’m going to Elbasy .. naive reasoning .. The rating is now made from the air .. and with the help of sophisticated frauds ..
        Sergey Lavrov, speaking at the Territory of Meanings forum in August 2019, allowed the opportunity to discuss the transfer of the Habomai and Shikotan islands "in exchange for concluding a peace treaty and Japan's official recognition of Russia's sovereignty over the Kuril Islands." It turns out that the Russian leaders themselves have not yet firm and clear position in the South Kuril Islands, and it is precisely this fact that the Japanese will try to take advantage of in the near future. Because so far there are more questions than answers, and doubts still remain in connection with the position of the authorities mentioned above.

        This government has a tough stance only in relation to its people ..
        1. Barmaleyka 24 February 2020 11: 43 New
          • 7
          • 9
          -2
          Quote: Svarog
          and now I’m going to Elbasy ..

          trust him to ebasy oh how far, I'm not talking about some pranks of Nazarbayev with his daughter
          1. vladcub 24 February 2020 12: 53 New
            • 8
            • 6
            +2
            You kept the little sack, what do you know about the "pranks" or the "grandmother in the market heard"?
            1. Barmaleyka 24 February 2020 13: 38 New
              • 5
              • 3
              +2
              Well, as if the granddaughter himself admitted that Nazik is not grandfather, but dad what’s Dariga’s mother, and I know exactly what the adder
        2. Kostyar 24 February 2020 11: 47 New
          • 30
          • 6
          +24
          Sergey Lavrov, speaking at the Territory of Meanings forum in August 2019, made it possible to discuss the transfer of the Habomai and Shikotan islands ...

          Something up there, they completely lost fear ???
          1. Sergey39 24 February 2020 11: 51 New
            • 21
            • 7
            +14
            And in the article on the map of Habomai Island, they already painted in Japanese color.
            1. Malyuta 24 February 2020 12: 00 New
              • 30
              • 10
              +20
              Quote: Sergey39
              And in the article on the map of Habomai Island, they already painted in Japanese color.

              Probably people are preparing to get used to the thought of a possible loss of islands.
              No transfer of the islands of Japan! We must declassify the ongoing negotiations with Japan! The people must know the truth! Then the islands will not color the colors of the property of the occupied country of Japland!
              1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 10 New
                • 13
                • 11
                +2
                sure, not a problem. tell me when and who said at least once that they would be transferred in exchange for something? ) begin to understand that politics is the art of the possible. It is beneficial for the state to have the opportunity to discuss various issues for as long as possible carrying a bow in front of an opponent like a cat. make a harsh statement now and just get the enemy in the region. and why?
                1. Mordvin 3 24 February 2020 12: 30 New
                  • 19
                  • 5
                  +14
                  Quote: carstorm 11
                  tell me when and who said at least once that they would be transferred in exchange for something? )

                  Under Yeltsin. Each resident of the Kuril Islands was promised 50 thousand bucks and a ticket to the mainland, or Japanese citizenship. Almost agreed.
                  1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 34 New
                    • 5
                    • 4
                    +1
                    I'm talking about the current government in general, but this rumor is accepted. I remember the same thing.
                    1. Mordvin 3 24 February 2020 12: 39 New
                      • 19
                      • 8
                      +11
                      Quote: carstorm 11
                      this rumor is accepted.

                      This is not a rumor. Almost everyone agreed there, then they pulled back. They say that the Japanese simply did not understand what to bring ... But this is a rumor ... wink
                      1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 42 New
                        • 12
                        • 11
                        +1
                        who agreed with whom? official source is it possible? otherwise it will remain a rumor to me.
                      2. Mordvin 3 24 February 2020 12: 44 New
                        • 14
                        • 6
                        +8
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        official source is it possible?

                        All the media wrote about this in the mid-90s. Sorry, did not save the waste paper.
                      3. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 48 New
                        • 9
                        • 8
                        +1
                        and various rumors are created about the Skripaly, for example) the media write something somewhere) I do not condone Yeltsin. chur me. but somehow used to rely on more serious sources. excuse me.
                      4. Mordvin 3 24 February 2020 12: 55 New
                        • 10
                        • 6
                        +4
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        and various rumors about the Skripaly are created, for example) the media write something somewhere)

                        If you don’t remember, the same Komsomolka was printing not convenient for the authorities. Interview with Basayev, with Sasha-Macedon, with Dudaev ... They burned the archive to zero, and all for a short time ...
                      5. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 13: 02 New
                        • 9
                        • 6
                        +3
                        again. I can’t focus on the media because of their complete discredit. I already asked a question and I will ask it now to you. why did the author put this particular card in the article?) because there is a bunch of normal ones and he put the one in which one of the islands is of a different color. that's all from the same opera about the media)
                      6. Mordvin 3 24 February 2020 13: 04 New
                        • 8
                        • 4
                        +4
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        and ask him now to you. why did the author put this particular card in the article?) because there is a bunch of normal ones and he put the one in which one of the islands is of a different color. that's all from the same opera about the media)

                        I would answer, but I'm not the author, alas ... crying
                      7. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 13: 06 New
                        • 7
                        • 6
                        +1
                        that's why I don’t believe it. such manipulations just offend me.
                      8. Mordvin 3 24 February 2020 13: 09 New
                        • 8
                        • 5
                        +3
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        such manipulations just offend me.

                        I don’t call a liar at all.
                      9. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 13: 12 New
                        • 6
                        • 9
                        -3
                        I'm not talking about this) I believe that the author specifically set this card and not out of stupidity. and the most important reason for this decision is not clear to me. increase the number of comments? or influence on the opinion of readers? that’s mean. and finely.
                      10. vladcub 24 February 2020 13: 21 New
                        • 7
                        • 1
                        +6
                        You voiced my thoughts: on the site, some authors deliberately provoke us to come out more "with foam." Business eats your left.
      2. Mordvin 3 24 February 2020 12: 46 New
        • 4
        • 4
        0
        And then Chubais was the prime minister. sad
      3. vladcub 24 February 2020 14: 07 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        And then Chubais was the prime minister. sad

        In fact, the "red Tolik" was not the head of government.
        "First Deputy Chairman of the Government": March 7, 1997 - March 23, 1998. The head of the government was V.S. Chernomyrdin.
  • Servisinzhener 24 February 2020 17: 04 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Who suggested? And what stopped it?
  • Victor N 24 February 2020 13: 15 New
    • 2
    • 8
    -6
    ".... if a diplomat says no, then this is not a diplomat."
    1. Krasnoyarsk 24 February 2020 13: 26 New
      • 11
      • 3
      +8
      Quote: Victor N
      ".... if a diplomat says no, then this is not a diplomat."

      At one time in the "west" Gromyko was called - "Man - No"
      And he was a very good diplomat.
      1. Victor N 24 February 2020 17: 58 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quotes. This is a line from a classic joke. But in every joke only a fraction of the joke ...
  • Sotskiy 24 February 2020 14: 51 New
    • 15
    • 5
    +10
    Quote: carstorm 11
    start to understand that politics is the art of the possible.

    And so Putin gave Damansky to China, and Medvedev to Norway a piece of the sea?
    If there weren’t these precedents, then the Kuril issue might have been treated exactly like you wrote here:
    Quote: carstorm 11
    it is beneficial for the state to have the opportunity to discuss various issues for as long as possible, carrying a bow like a cat in front of an opponent

    But the precedents of squandering territories for the “candy wrapper investment and the friendship of partners” have been going on since the time of the Tagged and still does not stop. So with what it is proposed to believe that the same people who gave away the territory of the country will suddenly close this very issue of border integrity once and for all, despite the RF Health and Federal Law? lol
    1. primaala 25 February 2020 08: 40 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Not the GDP gave the island. Officially they gave it in 1991. A truce in 1969 was signed by Kosygin.
      with the transfer of the island to the Chinese. Sign signed, but the island of then did not pass to China.
      1. Sotskiy 25 February 2020 10: 42 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: primaala
        Not the GDP gave the island.

        On October 15, 2004, in Beijing, Vladimir Putin put his signature on the “Supplemental Agreement on the Russian-Chinese State Border on its Eastern Part”.
        But could he not put it, or the Russian Federation is on the course to surrender its positions, begun by Gorbachev?
        1. primaala 25 February 2020 19: 24 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Sovetskiy
          Quote: primaala
          Not the GDP gave the island.

          On October 15, 2004, in Beijing, Vladimir Putin put his signature on the “Supplemental Agreement on the Russian-Chinese State Border on its Eastern Part”.
          But could he not put it, or the Russian Federation is on the course to surrender its positions, begun by Gorbachev?

          =======
          The events of 1969 are classified. The information that is available is superficial ...
          Far from GDP, the island was transferred to China. There are many things you can “find” on the network (inconsistency).
          And you never know what they write on the fence.
        2. Sotskiy 25 February 2020 22: 59 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: primaala
          The events of 1969 are classified

          Where do you get the information, if the events of 1969 are classified, that the island was transferred to China far from GDP? The actual transfer took place just with him.
  • Krasnoyarsk 24 February 2020 12: 19 New
    • 6
    • 6
    0
    Quote: Sergey39
    And in the article on the map of Habomai Island, they already painted in Japanese color.

    I think for a reason.
    1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 35 New
      • 7
      • 8
      -1
      I think those who put the article on a normal map for some reason were not needed. as well as hype and indignation) nothing personal only business)
      1. Sling cutter 24 February 2020 12: 44 New
        • 14
        • 7
        +7
        Quote: carstorm 11
        For some reason the card was not needed. as well as hype and indignation) nothing personal only business)

        And I remind you that on Hitler's maps Leningrad was also called St. Petersburg, and what do we have now?
        1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 46 New
          • 7
          • 5
          +2
          how do you do this?) then someone squeezed the article and the author chose the card. where did it come from and why did he choose it here is the main question) there are a lot of normal maps, but the author chose this one) does this bother you?
          1. Sling cutter 24 February 2020 13: 05 New
            • 13
            • 6
            +7
            Quote: carstorm 11
            there are a huge number of normal maps, but the author chose this one) does this bother you?

            The fact that "journalists" love "fried" is an axiom, more of hell is hype. But it bothers me, to say the least, a lot of things. Switching the inhabitants from one topic to another, preferably external, is the basis of the manipulation of consciousness. Now we all, like one, stand up for the Kuril Islands, and at that very moment they introduce some kind of tax or redeem themselves a savings bank, the stabilization fund can be cut among themselves or the ruble can be lowered by 2 times. While we begin to deal with urgent matters, the Kuril Islands will sail away for joint use, so after 20-30 years you’ll have a completely Kosovo version and so on.
            1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 13: 08 New
              • 7
              • 2
              +5
              Well, at the moment I'm talking exclusively about this card and what moved the author to place it here. pure provocation.
          2. Roman070280 25 February 2020 11: 18 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            there are a huge number of normal maps, but the author chose this one) does this bother you?

            And what should confuse here ??
            I would choose another card - this question would go unnoticed ..
            And since it just happened more clearly - what exactly is the conversation about ..
  • maidan.izrailovich 24 February 2020 13: 18 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    Sergey Lavrov, speaking at the Territory of Meanings forum in August 2019, made it possible to discuss the transfer of the Habomai and Shikotan islands ...
    Something up there, they completely lost fear ???

    The author of the article wrote a half-truth. And any half-truth is equal to a lie.
    Keywords of Lavrov about the islands were that Russia, as a successor to the USSR, is obliged to fulfill the obligations that the USSR assumed. It was within the framework of these obligations that the discussion was about the possible transfer of the two islands.
    At 15:40 listen ....
    1. Hypatius 24 February 2020 17: 17 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      ... Russia, as a successor to the USSR, is obliged to fulfill the obligations that the USSR assumed.
      And why didn’t Lavrov say that the USSR withdrew those obligations? And there were reasons for that.
      “Half the truth is a lie” (Jewish proverb).
  • tihonmarine 24 February 2020 11: 49 New
    • 18
    • 2
    +16
    Quote: Stroporez
    Gorbach also talked a lot, and everyone knows what came of it.

    It would be better if his mouth was sewn up with harsh threads.
    1. Mordvin 3 24 February 2020 12: 48 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Quote: tihonmarine
      It would be better if his mouth was sewn up with harsh threads.

      The CIA recently presented him with whole volumes of cases. Let him have fun.
  • Nikolaevich I 24 February 2020 14: 30 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Quote: Stroporez
    Gorbach also talked a lot, and everyone knows what came of it.

    What is Gorbach? And under Gorbachev, and under the EBN, the belonging of the Kuril Islands of Russia "hung in the balance"! What the Kuril Islands did not give can be characterized in one word ... LUCKY!
  • Malyuta 24 February 2020 11: 53 New
    • 19
    • 10
    +9
    Quote: snifer
    so that ...

    So last year it was announced that the negotiations would be kept secret ... The question is, why hide what?
    1. bessmertniy 24 February 2020 11: 59 New
      • 10
      • 3
      +7
      Perhaps today these negotiations would be worth stopping altogether. We do not have a peace treaty. And without a peace treaty, there’s nothing to talk about! hi
      1. New Year day 24 February 2020 19: 20 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Quote: bessmertniy
        And without a peace treaty, there’s nothing to talk about!

        And you can live without it! hi
        No him, and to hell with him! Who is cold or hot from this?
    2. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 12 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      the Japanese said this. Lavrov did not say that. It’s Yapis that this secrecy is needed.
    3. Krasnoyarsk 24 February 2020 12: 20 New
      • 10
      • 8
      +2
      Quote: Malyuta
      Quote: snifer
      so that ...

      So last year it was announced that the negotiations would be kept secret ... The question is, why hide what?

      Like what? Another betrayal of the country.
      1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 37 New
        • 6
        • 5
        +1
        only the Japanese spoke about secrecy in front of their deputies. and all) why is this already a question for them.
  • Terenin 24 February 2020 12: 49 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    Quote: snifer
    The king said negotiations are ongoing with partners, so ...

    Enough already "from empty to empty." Russian islands - and the point.
  • Paul Siebert 25 February 2020 13: 02 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    The donut hole will get the Japanese, not the islands.
    Why the hell should we bring them back?
    Russia lost the war to Japan? On the contrary - we won ...
    Russia desperately needs peace with Japan? ...
    Seventy-five years somehow lived without him and will continue to live!
    They want to make peace on their own terms?
    Let them declare war on Russia and storm Vladivostok, Moscow and St. Petersburg.
    If the flag of the Rising Sun rises above the Kremlin, you will have to consider the conditions of the samurai.
    But it seems to me that in case of war the scenario will be different ...
    After such a war, the young Japanese emperor will be appointed governor of the Japanese land ... laughing
  • Same lech 24 February 2020 11: 16 New
    • 16
    • 3
    +13
    but the Kuril question still remains a stumbling block between states.

    There is no stone here ... and there is nothing to discuss ... The Kuril Islands historically following the WWII are the territory of the USSR and Russia as the legal successor ... Japan, having signed the surrender act in 1945, automatically agrees with the WWII results ... that's all ... There is no point in discussing the Kuril issue.
    1. Sling cutter 24 February 2020 11: 25 New
      • 29
      • 17
      +12
      Quote: The same Lech
      but the Kuril question still remains a stumbling block between states.

      There is no stone here. and there’s nothing to discuss ... The Kuril Islands historically following the WWII are the territory of the USSR and Russia as the successor ... Japan, having signed the surrender act in 1945, automatically agrees with the WWII results ... that's all ... discussing the Kuril issue does not make sense .

      Then explain why the Russian delegations are conducting some sort of secret negotiations? Why is this topic being discussed in the media? I can remind you how secretly Daman Island was given, how part of the Barents Sea was given to Norway, how part of Dagestan was transferred to Azerbaijan. So with the current rulers you can not be sure of anything.
      1. Same lech 24 February 2020 11: 29 New
        • 20
        • 7
        +13
        Forgot to mention yet how Shevarnadze gave part of our fishing territories in the ocean ...

        They are bourgeois in Africa, bourgeois ... everywhere they seek instant benefits without thinking about the long-term consequences.
        The Russian government sometimes thinks in terms of a salesman ... only this can I explain the stupid things that they do without understanding the consequences of their decisions.
        1. Sling cutter 24 February 2020 11: 41 New
          • 22
          • 11
          +11
          Quote: The same Lech
          Forgot to mention yet how Shevarnadze gave part of our fishing territories in the ocean ...

          This Georgian devil-traitor is a separate topic for discussion, but his current followers behind a false patriotic screen scoop up bioresources from the Far East and artistically cut out the taiga, while populating the shores of Lake Baikal with the Chinese, selling them with fresh water.
          Quote: The same Lech
          The Russian government sometimes thinks in terms of a salesman ... only this can I explain the stupid things that they do without understanding the consequences of their decisions.

          I would not shift the blame solely on the government, because they have a direct boss.
          1. Same lech 24 February 2020 11: 43 New
            • 9
            • 6
            +3
            there is a direct boss.

            This figure is untouchable and unforgivable for his mistakes ... heh heh in the future he will also receive indulgence for a quiet life. smile
            Oh Russia -mother. what
          2. vladcub 24 February 2020 13: 31 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            The "Georgian devil-traitor" simply continued the policy of the "faithful Leninist" N. S. Khrushchev. If you recall the story, then at least 50% of what is happening now, appeared under N. S.
        2. Svarog 24 February 2020 11: 41 New
          • 13
          • 9
          +4
          Quote: The same Lech
          Forgot to mention yet how Shevarnadze gave part of our fishing territories in the ocean ...

          Medvedev gave away fish water areas ..
          1. Same lech 24 February 2020 11: 59 New
            • 14
            • 2
            +12
            In 1990, Shevarnadze signed an agreement with the United States where he signed an agreement on the division of the Bering Sea shelf on conditions unfavorable for the USSR ... the bastard was sold to foreigners ... so that the land would be glassy.
        3. tihonmarine 24 February 2020 12: 01 New
          • 12
          • 3
          +9
          Quote: The same Lech
          Forgot to mention yet how Shevarnadze gave part of our fishing territories in the ocean ...
          The Soviet Union donated the United States 46,3 thousand square kilometers of its territory in the Bering Sea. More precisely, he gave it not to the USSR, but to specific officials - M. Gorbachev (President of the USSR) and Shevardnadze E.A. (USSR Foreign Minister), and formally - not the territory, but the water area (but this does not change the essence).
        4. New Year day 24 February 2020 19: 21 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Quote: The same Lech
          Shevarnadze gave


          In its past, also from the KGB
      2. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 06 New
        • 7
        • 6
        +1
        and who said about secret negotiations and what media write about this?)))
        1. Same lech 24 February 2020 12: 13 New
          • 12
          • 8
          +4
          and who said about secret negotiations and what media write about this?)))

          Damansky Island was given to the Chinese without informing our society ... the same thing was done with the Norwegians ... so there is always vague suspicion that the Russian government is in secret negotiations with the Japanese behind our people ... in our time, trust in our government is too expensive costing the people.
          1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 15 New
            • 7
            • 6
            +1
            the question was generally more than specific))))
    2. Blacksmith 55 24 February 2020 11: 37 New
      • 5
      • 4
      +1
      By the way, why is the group of Habomai islands on the map painted in the color of a heap. Or have already passed, maybe I overslept?
      1. Same lech 24 February 2020 11: 38 New
        • 5
        • 6
        -1
        Do not jinx ... maybe a check of public opinion comes with the help of such stuffing.
        1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 38 New
          • 7
          • 2
          +5
          Or maybe the editors and authors should just find a normal map?), but if you put it in, you won’t be able to resent such stupidity really?))) this is called manipulation. the author poses a question and puts up a provocative sketch, and people here rush about with comments and are indignant. their number is growing ...)))
        2. New Year day 24 February 2020 19: 24 New
          • 4
          • 5
          -1
          Quote: The same Lech
          maybe a public opinion check


          Probably. If you scream “fire” all the time, then one day they will stop reacting to this scream ... and burn
  • figwam 24 February 2020 11: 18 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Military potential comparable to Russian, Land of the Rising Sun does not possess

    If we talk about the Far Eastern region, it is very comparable and continues to increase since China is growing nearby.
    1. kot28.ru 24 February 2020 13: 20 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      I believe that in order to equalize the chances in our direction it is enough to use the Bears from our Ukrainian. With the population density of Japan, samurai will not do that (with letters to measure). hiAnd let their minds continue to excite the minds of their electorate with their Wishlist. This is already a centuries-old tradition.
  • Mouse 24 February 2020 11: 23 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    then Japan’s hopes for the return of the South Kuril Islands will finally become illusory

    and so the question is closed! and the rest ... so yap Wishlist ....
    1. Terenin 24 February 2020 13: 00 New
      • 9
      • 1
      +8
      Quote: Mouse
      then Japan’s hopes for the return of the South Kuril Islands will finally become illusory

      and so the question is closed! and the rest ... so yap Wishlist ....

      Hi hi
      Well, then we are not greedy no

      1. vladcub 24 February 2020 13: 44 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Vladimir Volfovich, the yaps of Khakamada need no more than a dog’s fifth leg. If she, something material offered them, and so. Not the person’s first freshness. In the houses of "tolerance" is younger
  • Vyacheslav Viktorovich 24 February 2020 11: 26 New
    • 15
    • 9
    +6
    Strange amendments to the Constitution to "close the question", while at the same time demonstrating in practice that the text of the Constitution changes at any time at the request of the administration. One somehow contradicts the other.
    1. Snail N9 24 February 2020 11: 34 New
      • 20
      • 12
      +8
      Oh, these notorious "amendments" to the Constitution .... It is clear that under the pretext of "utility" they want to smuggle .... well, what "they" need ...
      Just one question they say will be:
      something like "Are you not against amendments to the Constitution?"
      Evil languages ​​are already ironic over the choice of answers:
      "Yeah I do not mind"
      "No I do not mind"...
      1. Same lech 24 February 2020 11: 40 New
        • 6
        • 6
        0
        It is more interesting how these amendments will be introduced into the referendum in packages or one by one ... muhlezh and swindle by the organizers of this case are not ruled out.
        1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 24 February 2020 11: 56 New
          • 3
          • 5
          -2
          Quote: The same Lech
          It is more interesting how these amendments will be introduced to the referendum in packets or singly ...
          Yes, it’s already known.

          "Concerning package, or for each offer [vote] - there may be thousands of proposals. There will be hundreds of them, and if we listen to the whole country, there may be thousands, ”the head of state said. - Therefore, no matter how difficult it may be, in order to put this to the vote, you still need to refine everything in the complex and offer people some kind of solution. "

          Putin made a special emphasis on the fact that if there are "if not thousands, then hundreds" proposals, then "simply technologically ... it will be impossible."


          https://tass.ru/politika/7538285
          1. Same lech 24 February 2020 12: 05 New
            • 8
            • 7
            +1
            Well then, it will be room for swindle people.
        2. tihonmarine 24 February 2020 12: 03 New
          • 8
          • 5
          +3
          Quote: The same Lech
          It is more interesting how these amendments will be introduced in referendum in packages or singly.

          As before, we voted at the party meeting "Vote list".
        3. New Year day 24 February 2020 19: 26 New
          • 5
          • 5
          0
          Quote: The same Lech
          how will they submit to the referendum


          Voting! And this is a violation of the constitution!
      2. Egoza 24 February 2020 11: 41 New
        • 12
        • 5
        +7
        Quote: Snail N9
        "You are not against amendments to the Constitution?"
        Evil languages ​​are already ironic over the choice of answers:
        "Yeah I do not mind"
        "No I do not mind"...

        It would be better to ask: "Do you want a return to the Stalin Constitution? Yes? No?"
        1. Svarog 24 February 2020 11: 49 New
          • 17
          • 8
          +9
          Quote: Egoza
          Quote: Snail N9
          "You are not against amendments to the Constitution?"
          Evil languages ​​are already ironic over the choice of answers:
          "Yeah I do not mind"
          "No I do not mind"...

          It would be better to ask: "Do you want a return to the Stalin Constitution? Yes? No?"

          Yeah .. at the word Stalin they become very pale, but you want them to return the Constitution ..
          1. carstorm 11 24 February 2020 12: 07 New
            • 7
            • 12
            -5
            Yes, no one becomes pale) you greatly confuse indifference and fear. very much)))
  • DMB 75 24 February 2020 11: 29 New
    • 15
    • 2
    +13
    But the opinion of most of our fellow citizens, of course, is unequivocal: not an inch of land can be given to the Japaneseeven if they "pay in gold." Indeed, for the South Kuril Islands, including, our soldiers and officers died in battles with the Japanese army.

    The Kuril Islands are ours. Kaliningrad is ours. Crimea is ours. Point.
    1. bessmertniy 24 February 2020 12: 00 New
      • 16
      • 0
      +16
      The results of World War II are not subject to revision! hi
    2. kot28.ru 24 February 2020 13: 25 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      And who does not like the Point, is Iskander, or Poplar!
  • Alexga 24 February 2020 11: 31 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    Any talk about transferring the islands of Japan leads to questions about revising the outcome of the war. This is unacceptable and criminal!
    1. Svarog 24 February 2020 11: 38 New
      • 21
      • 9
      +12
      Quote: AlexGa
      Any talk about transferring the islands of Japan leads to questions about revising the outcome of the war. This is unacceptable and criminal!

      It’s also not permissible to say that in addition to galoshes, nothing was produced in the USSR .. and it’s criminal to harass Stalin .. but this is all done .. so you can expect everything ..
  • Dizel200 24 February 2020 11: 32 New
    • 15
    • 2
    +13
    I wonder who are these people in Russia who constantly raise this issue of surrendering the islands of Japan? And in general seriously discuss this at the state level? Descendants of those who congratulated the Japanese emperor on the defeat of Russia in Tsushima? Sometimes you think about it, maybe Joseph Vissarionovich was right about the enemies of the people?
  • Chingachguk 24 February 2020 11: 38 New
    • 14
    • 1
    +13
    I would also introduce a law on punishment for attempts to review certain provisions of already adopted laws. The Russian territory is not exchanged, is not for sale, and its status cannot be reviewed or canceled by anyone. Dot! For an attempt to revise the law, a sentence of imprisonment of at least 10 years minimum !!!!! Without any amnesties or transfer to UDO, a suspended sentence is also excluded!
  • Alien From 24 February 2020 11: 38 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Balalaika them and not the island !!!!
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Shelest2000 24 February 2020 11: 39 New
    • 12
    • 6
    +6
    The updated Constitution of Russia will force to close the Kuril issue

    But it opens up a bunch of new questions, in particular about the so-called State Council with currently absent laws regulating its activities in the future. T.S. let's accept the amendments to the Constitution now, and the laws on the State Council - later. How, by whom and in whose favor these "laws" will be adopted, is not even necessary to assume - and so everything is clear.
    And all these provisions on territories, etc. - ordinary smoke screen.
    Zy. By the way, the notorious Shuvalov (yes, the one that carries a dog on the plane at the exhibition and laughing at the small apartments of citizens), already
    came up with a proposal to enshrine in the main law the definition of entrepreneurship as an activity related to the formation of values. At the same time, entrepreneurs should be designated in the Constitution as the advanced class of people “creating a new Russia”
    1. Hypatius 24 February 2020 17: 36 New
      • 5
      • 4
      +1
      What an interesting interpretation of “entrepreneurship” has Count Shuvalov! In my understanding, this sounds like: "Every slave who does any work owes to the LLC of the Russian Federation, regardless of the costs." Something
      you will do your own repairs, but the organized criminal group is obliged to pay.
      And it should be: "Every free person has the right to the result of his labor.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • 7,62h54 24 February 2020 11: 59 New
    • 13
    • 7
    +6
    The word does not hold, some statements about the pension reform are worth.
    1. Ronald Reagan 24 February 2020 18: 14 New
      • 5
      • 9
      -4
      Stop whining, tired already. March to work. wink
  • Humpty 24 February 2020 12: 07 New
    • 15
    • 3
    +12
    It’s not for me to point out, but it would be better if at the legislative level to ban any Japanese investments in Russia. I have a relatively brief experience working with the Japanese as a contractor foreman.
    The customer was one of their firms with a 150-year history and multi-billion dollar (in securities) turnover.
    Most characteristic of the Japanese side:
    1. Incredible deceit.
    2. Meanness.
    3. Glaring, total incompetence.
    4. Greed.
    5. Hackwork. Quality is Chinese.
    In the countries of the Pacific, people are generally regarded as consumables.
    The fewer contacts with the Japanese, the better.
    They poured little into the war, so they show off. There is a separate claim to the Americans. The transfer of at least one stone sticking out of the water with this ... I can’t pick up the words, it’s a spit not only to the people of Russia, but also insulting to the Chinese, with their victims, they could safely demand from Japan some large island.
    1. Dizel200 24 February 2020 12: 59 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      What's so really bad? And Yapov always seems to be put as an example
      1. Humpty 24 February 2020 13: 59 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Dizel200
        What's so really bad? And Yapov always seems to be put as an example

        For me it was a break in the template. They probably know how to do something. At the twenty-four year old Nissan with a Toyota box.
        But
        Quote: kot28.ru
        Yes, and now Japanese electronics is a sign of quality

        Consumer electronics in the 80-90's characteristics and quality is not particularly impressive, although depending on what to compare.
    2. kot28.ru 24 February 2020 13: 35 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Well xs about quality. Our AvtoVAZ still has not reached the quality of the right-hand drive Toyota, 90s consumer electronics from Japan, excellent quality (namely Japanese and not assembly Malaysia or Taiwan), and now Japanese electronics is a quality mark . They don’t have resources, they have nothing to sell, that's why they think how and what to do in order to live. Ours is the opposite. Oil and woods are still ... a lot, why to develop the same automotive industry? Import duties on pruloks will increase, sensors They’ll come up with Glonass, if only people would change to Lada ... Not guys, I won’t exchange my Toyota for a bug, not that coat. And the islands, which are rightfully the territory of Russia, do not prevent Russia from trading with Japan. Our obstacles are much more invincible bureaucracy.
  • knn54 24 February 2020 12: 11 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Suggests thought "painted" in the Japanese color by Father Haboman ...
  • Andrei from Chelyabinsk 24 February 2020 12: 11 New
    • 18
    • 10
    +8
    If the amendment, which actor and director Vladimir Mashkov spoke at the meeting with the president, is adopted in the Constitution, the issue of South Kuril membership will be closed forever.

    We have such a president, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, who needs to review the constitution - that two bytes should be sent. He wanted to rule longer - he increased the presidency to 6 years, didn’t want someone to sit on the royal throne after him — he remodeled the constitution so that the president could not hold office for more than two terms (not in a row, as now, but in general).
    Another president will come - what, will he somehow relate to the constitution differently? It will be necessary for him - he will change, and we will vote, all as one, in a single rush ...
    1. Dizel200 24 February 2020 13: 02 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      That is, do you want the existing Constitution, forcibly imposed by America and Western Europe, to remain in its original form?
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk 24 February 2020 13: 27 New
        • 10
        • 2
        +8
        Quote: Dizel200
        That is, do you want the existing Constitution, forcibly imposed by America and Western Europe, to remain in its original form?

        Vladislav, do you know how to read? :))) I actually write that the entry in the constitution will not solve the issue with the Kuril Islands. How did you manage to conclude from this that I supposedly agree with the current version of the Constitution of the Russian Federation?
      2. New Year day 24 February 2020 19: 29 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Quote: Dizel200
        forcibly imposed by America and Western Europe on Russia


        Well, for 20 years she was so vomited? Patience is over or Wishlist appeared? laughing
    2. vladcub 24 February 2020 13: 55 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Andrei, what do you suggest: shouting your hands off the "American constitution"? The current Constitution - 2/3 of the American Constitution deducted
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk 24 February 2020 17: 22 New
        • 9
        • 2
        +7
        Quote: vladcub
        The current Constitution - 2/3 of the American Constitution deducted

        Svyatoslav, I have a lot to offer. Personally, I would be 100% satisfied with the situation when we created a normal constitution, taking the USSR constitution as a model, and then excluded the possibility of redrawing it at the discretion of the current president. And I would also like to see the return of the real, not staged, process of voting in elections and referenda. And pills for greed. And more !!!
        In general, dreaming is not harmful, only what does this have to do with the issue under discussion?
        1. vladcub 25 February 2020 13: 24 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Andrei, you have a wonderful, but FANTASTIC dream: pills for greed will not appear soon.
          We had a BEAUTIFUL constitution, but it did not protect against betrayal, and betrayal did not begin in the Bialowieza Forest and not in 1985, when M. S came to power, but earlier
  • Thrifty 24 February 2020 12: 13 New
    • 10
    • 2
    +8
    Such a map, where the Habomai archipelago is already painted in Japanese colors, is dangerous for the future of Russia! Now losing part of the Russian land over time, you can lose the whole country.
    1. rotkiv04 24 February 2020 14: 12 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      It’s not the current rulers who stole these lands, not to give them to them, but in general it’s necessary to shoot them
  • Astra wild 24 February 2020 12: 26 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    We are waiting for Japanese demonstrations in defense of the current Constitution of the Russian Federation.
    Here is the picture: Abe stands with a poster in front of the Kremlin: "Hands off the current constitution."
  • DPN
    DPN 24 February 2020 12: 51 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    She will not close anything, as the supreme will say, so be it. Just introduce a bunch of by-laws and will twist as you like.
  • Ham
    Ham 24 February 2020 12: 55 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    abe have to do seppuku because he deceived the "spirit of his father"?
  • BAI
    BAI 24 February 2020 13: 02 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    If the Constitution of the Russian Federation contains a provision prohibiting the alienation of lands, Japan's hopes for the return of the South Kuril Islands will finally become illusory. The updated Constitution (if amendments are adopted and supported) will force to close the Kuril issue. Is it so?

    Not this way. Because Amur remains with a constantly changing fairway (the border with China passes along the fairway). Therefore, in any case, there will be a window for changing the border. The Kuril Islands and Japan will fit into this window at an opportunity.
  • certero 24 February 2020 13: 03 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The Japanese chance of returning the islands has been drained forever. There was a moment when Yeltsin was ready to give something back. but they wanted everything. present transfer of even one island so worsens the position of our fleet in the Pacific Ocean that it is absolutely unacceptable
  • Sova 24 February 2020 13: 09 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Sergey39
    And in the article on the map of Habomai Island, they already painted in Japanese color.

    Also drew attention, it is better to choose pictures.
  • Klingon 24 February 2020 13: 31 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Well, if Abe swore the spirit of his father, then the matter is bad ... Abe will have to make a seppuk so as not to disgrace her father’s name and family wassat
  • samarin1969 24 February 2020 13: 32 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    ... in exchange for investment in the Russian economy.

    Yes, under Gorbachev it was already said that these mythical "investments" in "development" had no alternative. And before each election they sang about "investors at a low start."
    Yes, all this nonsense! No one except the state in Russia will create high-tech enterprises.
    There is no agreement with Japan - and wonderful!
    And the "Mashkov initiative" is a dummy. In the realities of the Russian Federation - amendments to the Constitution - the usual protocol issue for lawyers. No opposition - no problem for amendments.
  • vladcub 24 February 2020 13: 49 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: carstorm 11
    Well, at the moment I'm talking exclusively about this card and what moved the author to place it here. pure provocation.

    And provocations are always mean
    1. depressant 25 February 2020 00: 53 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Colleagues, I read, I read ... That you all are attached to the Author! He simply shows with this card what the Japanese want and what our government should not do, namely: to allow the Japanese to color it legally.
  • rotkiv04 24 February 2020 14: 08 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    Putin is good, these are boyars scum and traitors, over there an iPhone made a bastard of the pension rehform, he had to be kicked out with rags, that’s constantly worried about troubled water, he’s negotiating behind the tsar’s back
  • Sapsan136 24 February 2020 14: 24 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    For calls for violation of the territorial integrity of Russia, it is necessary to deprive the citizenship of the Russian Federation and deport from the Russian Federation at 24 o’clock, with the confiscation of property ... I will consider the transfer of Kuril or part of Japan treason!
  • Sergey Averchenkov 24 February 2020 14: 59 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "Our line should be this: a peace treaty can be signed between the two countries only after solving the issue of the return of all four" northern islands "to Japan."
    Well, figs we can do with them without a peace treaty.
    1. 2 Level Advisor 26 February 2020 08: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Well, let's decide - do not pass! All - decided .. And what else is there to sign? laughing
  • Kolin 24 February 2020 15: 27 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Has the second transmission of the Kuril Islands started this year?
    Usually left comrades transmit the Kuril Islands on the Internet from 6 to 10 times a year.
  • Sotskiy 24 February 2020 15: 37 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    If the Constitution of the Russian Federation contains a provision prohibiting the alienation of lands, Japan's hopes for the return of the South Kuril Islands will finally become illusory.

    But will it not happen that after amendments to the Constitution, just for the Russian Federation, hopes for the return of illegally alienated territories of one large country after Belovezhie will finally become illusory? Is it not by these changes in the RF RF that they want to legislate, with the help of a popular expression, once again to consolidate in the Constitution the results of the Bialowieza agreements and the borders existing at the moment?
    1. Salty 24 February 2020 15: 43 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      Quote: Sovetskiy
      If the Constitution of the Russian Federation contains a provision banning the alienation of lands, then Japan's hopes for the return of the South Kuril Islands will finally become illusory

      These hopes are already ghostly. There is a video with Lavrov, and everything is clearly explained in it.

      Quote: Sovetskiy
      But will it not happen that after changes to the Constitution, just for the Russian Federation, hopes for the return of illegally alienated territories of one large country after Belovezhie will finally become illusory?

      Returns to where? The USSR is gone, this is an objective reality.
      1. Sotskiy 24 February 2020 16: 04 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Quote: SaltY
        Returns to where? The USSR is gone, this is an objective reality.

        How to say. The results of the Soviet-Polish war of 1919-1921 led to the fact that Belarus and Ukraine were divided between Poland and the republics that became part of the Soviet Union in 1922. The territory of Lithuania was divided between Poland and the independent Lithuanian state.
        In 1939, none of the countries of the former Entente was outraged, moreover, they considered the return of the USSR pre-war territories legal.
        What will happen if the “troika” agreements are officially recognized as unlawful? lol
        1. Salty 24 February 2020 16: 17 New
          • 10
          • 4
          +6
          Quote: Sovetskiy
          What will happen if the “troika” agreements are officially recognized as unlawful?

          1. Who exactly "recognizes"?
          2. There will be nothing, neither the Ukrainians, nor even the Belarusians, are especially eager for any "new alliances." Will you drive them there with kicks, or do you have a magic pipe, a la Gammelny Pied Piper?
          1. Sotskiy 24 February 2020 16: 23 New
            • 4
            • 4
            0
            Quote: SaltY
            There will be nothing, neither the Ukrainians, nor even the Belarusians, are especially eager for any "new alliances."

            Under the current regime, I agree that there will be nothing, this is confirmed by the Russian-Belarusian negotiations on Belarus entering the Russian Federation.
            1. Salty 24 February 2020 16: 30 New
              • 10
              • 4
              +6
              Quote: Sovetskiy
              With the current regime I agree, there will be nothing

              Here. Correctly. First you need to change the system - here, in Belarus and Ukraine. To do this, arrange a new revolution and defeat the interventionists, as it once was. And only then think about the USSR-2. So?
              1. Sotskiy 24 February 2020 16: 43 New
                • 5
                • 3
                +2
                Quote: SaltY
                Quote: Sovetskiy
                With the current regime I agree, there will be nothing

                Here. Correctly. First you need to change the system - here, in Belarus and Ukraine. To do this, arrange a new revolution and defeat the interventionists, as it once was. And only then think about the USSR-2. So?

                And with us or somewhere else, was it somehow different? lol In now "holy" monarchical times, haven't they changed power by force? Or maybe Yeltsin democratically shot the White House in 1993 and finally seized power? lol The USA in general is gaining new "friends" by a change of government and nothing, the "democracy" of the USA is in bloom and smells. laughing
                1. Salty 24 February 2020 16: 48 New
                  • 8
                  • 5
                  +3
                  Quote: Sovetskiy
                  And with us or somewhere else, was it somehow different?

                  It doesn’t matter what and where it was. It is important that you agree that without a revolution (inevitably accompanied by intervention) you can not even think about a new Union. It’s not entirely clear, however, your cheerful attitude towards all this, all of these lol и laughing
                  1. Sotskiy 24 February 2020 17: 00 New
                    • 4
                    • 2
                    +2
                    Quote: SaltY
                    Quote: Sovetskiy
                    And with us or somewhere else, was it somehow different?

                    It doesn’t matter what and where it was. It is important that you agree that without a revolution (inevitably accompanied by intervention) you can not even think about a new Union. It’s not entirely clear, however, your cheerful attitude towards this lol laughing

                    And where did you see in my answers that you agree with the inevitable intervention, especially if there are nuclear forces on both sides in the current conditions? Yes, and the concept of the term revolution is not interpreted in a way that you unequivocally interpret.
                    It’s another matter that nobody will voluntarily return the property of people “honestly depressed” from the people voluntarily, that’s for sure. So who then spills the first blood? Guessed - "revolutionaries" lol
                    1. Salty 24 February 2020 17: 20 New
                      • 7
                      • 4
                      +3
                      Clearly, there will be no intervention. Because you want it that way lol True, you forgot to ask world imperialism whether he wants (by chance) to take 1/7 of the land under control lol

                      Quote: Sovetskiy
                      the concept of the term revolution is interpreted not so you unequivocally interpret it

                      And how is it still interpreted? You already wrote about spilled blood.
                      1. Sotskiy 24 February 2020 17: 24 New
                        • 3
                        • 3
                        0
                        Quote: SaltY
                        And how is it still interpreted?

                        Well, I don’t propose Marx and Lenin; read at least Wikipedia.
                      2. Salty 24 February 2020 17: 27 New
                        • 7
                        • 3
                        +4
                        Colleague, this is a clean drain. Took to tell tales, so tell to the end. And about the "spilled blood" in more detail, very interesting. And then like this, in the most interesting place - "go to Wikipedia" laughing
                      3. Sotskiy 24 February 2020 17: 41 New
                        • 3
                        • 2
                        +1
                        belay Where is he, draining it?
                        Is it weak to search on your own or is it necessary to bring it on a "platter"?
                        "Tales" say. Well, if in the 90s shed blood when dividing property is a fairy tale for you, I congratulate you, they easily slipped through. Or maybe not born yet?
                      4. Salty 24 February 2020 17: 45 New
                        • 7
                        • 3
                        +4
                        Quote: Sovetskiy
                        Where is he, draining it?

                        Here it is:

                        Quote: Sovetskiy
                        Yes, and the concept of the term revolution is interpreted not so you unequivocally interpret it

                        Quote: SaltY
                        And how is it still interpreted?

                        Quote: Sovetskiy
                        at least read Wikipedia

                        I consider further discussion with you unnecessary. Until we meet again.
                      5. Sotskiy 24 February 2020 17: 46 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Quote: SaltY
                        I consider further discussion with you unnecessary. Until we meet again.

                        Similarly wink Salut!
  • Nikolaevich I 24 February 2020 15: 43 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Why are the "general secretaries" and the "presidents" stuck "to the Kuril Islands? Even Winnie-the-Pooh is understandable that the Kuriles cannot be" handed over! "Ukrainians" want "the Kuban, not to mention the Crimea ... to get it ... itching in Poland ... itching in Germany .. China "hints" Georgia in Sochi is "drying up" ... It’s worth letting slack happen, as the line of “thirsty people” will become twice as many!
  • remal 24 February 2020 15: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The question will be closed when the Kuril Islands are covered with radars and bristled with military aircraft.
    I now believe that this can be achieved through the transfer of space topics to the Ministry of Defense. Here Plesetsk is a military spaceport, we launch a manned ship from there on the basis of RD-180 engines, which means that military radars, airfields, and helipads must be placed along the tundra’s border. Then we transfer this system to the east, where the flight paths of the ships to the ISS pass exactly above the Kuril ridge. A helicopter fleet will still be required for helicopters to collect spent steps.

    Well, then you can already walk on the planet)) Protons run from the Brazilian spaceport. Accordingly, the helicopter carriers send there. Launch reusable rockets from the Kourou launch site and assemble the steps in the same way. Well, in the finals to develop a “sea launch”. Now it’s one rocket with RD-171, then refine to launch a bunch of 3 missiles. Because 5 from the new platform. This is all from the Pacific Ocean.

    Here is a program of action from 5 locations with access to the operational space of the world's oceans.
    You can’t appease Japan with islands, they will still be "puppets" of the USA, because there SpaceX and generally a forge of technology, capital and other things.
    1. 2 Level Advisor 26 February 2020 08: 10 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The question is already closed without radars, and if they want to download, they will download with radars on our islands, but this is their problem ..
      1. remal 28 February 2020 09: 20 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The Japanese intercepted the Su-34. Flight chart attached.
  • Petrol cutter 24 February 2020 16: 23 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    If you throw away the polites ... I am almost sure that this amendment will pass without options. Thus, at the legislative level, questions will be closed on the Crimean peninsula as a whole, and also on the Kuril Islands in particular. For our country. (Which cannot but please me, like the Crimean man).
    There is such a danger for me personally: who will steer the country further? And what will prevent him from making his amendments to the Constitution ?!
    And in the event of adverse changes, I personally will have to drop everything, and strategically evacuate to the mainland in old age. With the rest of the family. And who on the mainland needs me?
  • serge siberian 24 February 2020 16: 53 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    If amendments to the Constitution will be pushed all together, then you should vote against all this imitation of democracy. Everyone should go to vote. And choose your own path further. If for each amendment separately, then this is a more suitable option. soldier
  • Vladimir Mashkov 24 February 2020 18: 25 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    What a strange article? The name is normal. The author began "for health", finished - "for peace." And the map was drawn by some kind of “designer boy” or “designer girl”: the archipelago of the Lesser Kuril Ridge (what is called the Habomai Islands) was “donated” to Japan - depicted as the territory of Japan!
  • Dmitriyag 24 February 2020 18: 43 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    And the smoking issue and pensions, well, can not be solved without changing the constitution
  • New Year day 24 February 2020 19: 12 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    Sergey Lavrov, speaking at the Territory of Meanings forum in August 2019, made it possible to discuss the transfer of the Habomai and Shikotan islands

    Cool! So that’s why the Japanese were so happy! There is no smoke without fire!
    And since Lavrov only voices Putin, then the cards on the table - bargain Kuril desire was!
  • Domestic cat 24 February 2020 21: 28 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Negotiations on the Kuril Islands should not be at all. We lived without a peace treaty with the Yapis, and another hundred years we will live without it. Once and for all, tell the Japs that any negotiations on the Kuril ownership cease.
  • iouris 25 February 2020 00: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Updating the constitution may raise such questions that hundreds of wise men do not have time to answer them. Let's hope for the best. In any case, the plan to isolate yourself with a text from solving real problems and global issues is idealism. But some thirty years ago, all were materialists.
  • zav
    zav 25 February 2020 06: 40 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    “Chur me,” conjures the government, hoping for a new constitution.
    In the morning, the authorities understand that it is impossible to give the Kuril Islands, but they no longer hope for themselves.
  • bycharashkO 25 February 2020 07: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Habomai are shown by Japanese. Could the figure in the article be considered a call to violate the territorial integrity of Russia?
    1. iouris 25 February 2020 20: 19 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Talk about the Russian Federation. The integrity of Russia has long been violated, and calls for its restoration can be considered extremist.
  • vladcub 25 February 2020 15: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Serge Siberian
    If amendments to the Constitution will be pushed all together, then you should vote against all this imitation of democracy. Everyone should go to vote. And choose your own path further. If for each amendment separately, then this is a more suitable option. soldier

    In this case, this “pleasure” will be long: everyone has their own opinion and amendments already had a cart and a cart
  • Bryanskiy_Volk 26 February 2020 19: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I am only interested in why the Green Island and other “Flat Islands” (islands: Polonsky, Shards, Demin, Yuri, Anuchin, Tanfilyev) on this map are designated as part of Japan? Affftor - Teach Geography fool
  • Brigadier 27 February 2020 09: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The updated Constitution of Russia is ETERNAL AND UNCONDITIONAL PUTIN.
  • Stalnov I.P. 28 February 2020 10: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In fact, who gave them the right to give these territories, watered by the blood of Soviet soldiers, no one gave the laurel the right to even talk about it. Japan is under the direct protectorate of the United States, which programs, when they themselves did not fulfill their promises to remove the Americans from their territory. Even if they remove it, we will only give it back when the Yankees come back. As they were false and corrupt, they remained. Not an inch of land and a point, enough to balamute the RUSSIAN PEOPLE with their tricks. It would be better to deal with the economy, social programs, and then only fairy tales that for some reason do not come true.
  • swzero 28 February 2020 12: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The author forgets that Japan is not a sovereign state. The hysteria about smoking was fueled by the states. And when there comes an order to switch to military action, Japan will execute it without hesitation on economic ties, everyone will not care. Ukraine is an example of this. If we assume that Japan suddenly organizes a landing with the full informational support of the "world community", is there anything we can answer for? With the fleet minus the sailboats, our TF is not very good, unlike Japan. Nuclear weapons to use? And if the states threaten to apply it in response? Are there enough opportunities to defeat Japan in a local conflict without the use of nuclear weapons? And if, for example, Ukraine and Poland, the Baltic states and Georgia climb to the Crimea, Donbass and Abkhazia, Norway to Svalbard?