For the Su-57 created an intra-fuselage hypersonic missile


Reported on the creation of a special type of weapon for the Russian fighter of the 5th generation. This was reported by the TASS information service.


The materials of the agency contain information that we are talking about a hypersonic missile, which was developed by specialists of the domestic military-industrial complex.

It is noted that the rocket will be located in the internal compartment of the Su-57 fighter. In other words, this is an intra-fuselage version of the hypersonic weapons of a combat aircraft.

Additionally, it is said that the rocket has a relatively small size and belongs to the class of "air-surface".

At the moment, it is known that so far the prototype of a small-sized hypersonic missile has not passed flight tests with the Su-57 fighter. About any characteristics of the new weapons for the aircraft is not reported.

Recall that previously it was reported plans to equip the latest Russian fighter hypersonic weapons. Currently in aviation in service there is one hypersonic missile system. This is a “Dagger” with a MiG-31 carrier. No other country in the world has an army with hypersonic weapons.
Photos used:
Sukhoi Corporation
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

135 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Thrall 23 February 2020 09: 00 New
    • 10
    • 9
    +1
    No specifics.
    1. Xambo 23 February 2020 09: 03 New
      • 38
      • 15
      +23
      Quote: Thrall
      No specifics.

      Secretly and correctly do what they keep quiet .. And now there are curious "comrades" from one small, but cunning country they will run up ..)) ()
      1. Michael67 23 February 2020 09: 57 New
        • 21
        • 4
        +17
        Of course, no specifics. It’s good that they even said that. As a congratulation on February 23rd. Thanks! Good news. All involved with the holiday! Health, comrades!
        1. Range 23 February 2020 15: 35 New
          • 10
          • 1
          +9
          The bastards are and are already good. So far in the field of hypersound Russia is ahead of the rest. Now pops (Traitors to the Customs of the Ancestors from the near abroad) will come out of all the cracks and begin to minus the black. They usually fly in packs. I consider all AFU-shnikov and SBU-shik POP-s, who betrayed their relatives, grandfathers and great-grandfathers, for the smelly cookie.
          Congratulations to all on the Defender of the Fatherland Day!
          All but POPs.
      2. Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 10: 07 New
        • 8
        • 48
        -40
        No other country in the world has an army with hypersonic weapons.
        Quote: Xambo
        .And now there are curious "comrades" from one small, but cunning country, they run up ..)

        Thanks to "comrades" from one small, but technically advanced country, you can know TRUTH.
        "Rampage is precision hypersonic air-to-ground missile long range designed to hit the most important targets. . The main feature of the “Rampage” is that it is issued from a long distance, while the aircraft does not need to enter the range of enemy air defense. The missile range is 150 kilometers, the length is 4,7 meters, the mass of the warhead is 150 kilograms. The missile entered service in 2019. "
        1. helmi8 23 February 2020 10: 52 New
          • 29
          • 2
          +27
          Quote: Vitaly Gusin
          "" Rampage "is a high-precision hypersonic long-range air-to-ground missile,

          If you copy the text, then do not correct it for your "Wishlist". They would also write hyperslight ... laughing In all sources
          Rampage - Israeli supersonic air-to-surface missile ©
          1. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 11: 02 New
            • 3
            • 18
            -15
            Quote: helmi8
            Rampage - Israeli air-to-surface supersonic missile

            Quote: helmi8
            Rampage "- a high-precision hypersonic missile

            I am not a specialist and the pronounced difference between "super" and "hyper" escapes me, except for the linguistic one.

            Fair. hi
            1. helmi8 23 February 2020 11: 04 New
              • 9
              • 0
              +9
              Quote: Vasyan1971
              the difference between over and hyper

              Supersound is from 1230 to 6150 km / h, and hypersound is from 6150 to 12300 km / h. There is also the so-called "fast hypersound" (12300-30740 km / h), but it is precisely military rockets that have not yet been developed ©
              1. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 11: 22 New
                • 7
                • 16
                -9
                I was told that hypersonic speed falls under the definition of supersonic, but not vice versa. AND considered, that supersonic speed is a speed of 1M (Mach one), while hypersonic speed is usually called a speed of 5M. In short, “hyper” is “super-super”.
                In our world, too many and too often are cunning, therefore, not knowing the passport data, Rampage can be designated and accepted as "over" and "hyper". Therefore - do not quarrel about nonsense. hi
                1. Grigory_45 23 February 2020 11: 54 New
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  +3
                  Quote: Vasyan1971
                  In our world, too many and too often are cunning, therefore, not knowing the passport data, Rampage can be designated and accepted as "over" and "hyper". Therefore - do not quarrel on nonsense

                  as if hypersonic is also a supersonic, only still "faster". But no one will indicate "supersonic" if the rocket can accelerate to 6M, for example .. In the performance characteristics it is customary to indicate specifics.
                  Otherwise, you can simply write a warship without specifying its class - and go guess what it is, an aircraft carrier, a nuclear submarine or a missile boat
                  1. novel66 23 February 2020 12: 02 New
                    • 5
                    • 4
                    +1
                    yeah! either a gun or a machine gun!
                  2. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 12: 26 New
                    • 2
                    • 7
                    -5
                    Quote: Gregory_45
                    as if hypersonic is also a supersonic, only still "faster".

                    Something like this?
                    Quote: Vasyan1971
                    In short, “hyper” is “super-super”.

                    Quote: Gregory_45
                    Otherwise, you can simply write a warship without specifying its class - and go guess what it is, an aircraft carrier, a nuclear submarine or a missile boat

                    Here. And recently, Kuznetsov was called a “steamboat” and when I focused on this I almost threw mud at it.
                    Spit on the minuses.
                    1. Grigory_45 23 February 2020 12: 34 New
                      • 2
                      • 2
                      0
                      Quote: Vasyan1971
                      Spit on the minuses.

                      cons are not mine
                      1. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 12: 51 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Quote: Gregory_45
                        cons are not mine

                        This is not for you. It's me just in the air. hi
                2. fk7777777 23 February 2020 13: 13 New
                  • 0
                  • 10
                  -10
                  6 thousand km per hour is the speed of the satellite, so from 11 thousand km per hour an object can come off the planet earth and go into space ... Nu, what’s even cooler to take everyone down? ... The school teacher was taught how the Balts rushed to bring down the Roman empire, well, there the arrows painted on the map, such as a bunch of marginals stormed the whole of Europe, the most pinned how they captured London, and through Spain they turned to Morocco, turned 90 degrees and, through the sea, took Rome. Or the level of civilization was not the one that we were being rubbed back then.
                  1. 1976AG 23 February 2020 14: 13 New
                    • 7
                    • 0
                    +7
                    Quote: fk7777777
                    6 thousand km per hour is the speed of the satellite, so from 11 thousand km per hour an object can come off the planet earth and go into space ... Nu, what’s even cooler to take everyone down? ... The school teacher was taught how the Balts rushed to bring down the Roman empire, well, there the arrows painted on the map, such as a bunch of marginals stormed the whole of Europe, the most pinned how they captured London, and through Spain they turned to Morocco, turned 90 degrees and, through the sea, took Rome. Or the level of civilization was not the one that we were being rubbed back then.

                    When will you stop lying? Satellite speed not less than 7, 91 km / s or more than 28000 km / h
                3. Private-K 23 February 2020 15: 28 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  We are talking about well-established TERMS. And the term has an established CONCEPT expressed in this case, the tangible / recorded PHYSICAL value - speed.
                  If you are a bad "poet" (tm), then you don't give a damn about it. There are plenty of them. But a good poet, the right one, is simply obliged to FEEL the physical difference without even understanding the mathematical expression of quantities.
                  hi
                  1. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 16: 01 New
                    • 0
                    • 5
                    -5
                    Quote: Private-K
                    If you are a bad "poet" (tm), then you don't give a damn about it.

                    Well, first of all, the “bad poet” doesn’t give a damn about what other so-called “good” poets think of him.
                    And if it concerns me, then I repeat:
                    Quote: Vasyan1971
                    I am not a specialist and the pronounced difference between "super" and "hyper" escapes me, except for the linguistic one.

                    And your “smarting” has not changed anything for me.
                    Quote: Private-K
                    But a good poet, right, is simply obligated

                    I simply must notify you that I personally am not obliged, especially to you. hi
                4. Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 15: 47 New
                  • 0
                  • 6
                  -6
                  Quote: Vasyan1971
                  Rampage can be designated and accepted as "over" and "hyper". Therefore - do not quarrel about nonsense.

                  100% +1
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. Operator 23 February 2020 16: 01 New
                    • 10
                    • 0
                    +10
                    The humpbacked Rampage with protruding suspension units and front (sic!) Plumage is nothing more than the next supersonic offspring of the MARS rocket


                    To hypersound Rampage like to the moon.
                    1. Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 16: 28 New
                      • 2
                      • 6
                      -4
                      Quote: Operator
                      nothing more than another supersonic offspring of the MARS rocket

                      A dagger is an iskander


                      This is another modification of MARS and Rampage.
                      DO NOT EXPERIENCE
                      1. Operator 23 February 2020 16: 57 New
                        • 5
                        • 1
                        +4
                        You can distinguish the word Rocks from the word Rampage? laughing
                      2. Operator 23 February 2020 17: 01 New
                        • 7
                        • 1
                        +6
                        Enlighten - Rocks ballistic missile (Black Sparrow offspring) in the center photo


                        Hello to AMAN laughing
                      3. Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 18: 00 New
                        • 0
                        • 4
                        -4
                        Quote: Operator
                        Hello to AMAN

                        Required.
                        And you, Igor Konashenkov.
            2. helmi8 23 February 2020 16: 09 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              Quote: Vasyan1971
              Rampage can be designated and accepted as "over" and "hyper". Therefore - do not quarrel about nonsense.

              By your logic, everything that moves at a speed of more than 1300 m / s can already be called hyper-fast ... Applause. yes
              1. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 16: 16 New
                • 0
                • 5
                -5
                Quote: helmi8
                Applause.

                Thank you.
                Quote: helmi8
                can be called hyper speed

                And who, in fact, is bothering you?
                Quote: Vasyan1971
                I am not a specialist and the pronounced difference between "super" and "hyper" escapes me, except for the linguistic one.

                What is the matter? What are the claims? For what purpose?
                1. helmi8 23 February 2020 16: 58 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: Vasyan1971
                  What is the matter? What are the claims? For what purpose?

                  Yes, no claim ... More - outrage. This is another matter. You yourself write that you are not an expert. So you do not need to distribute fakes. After all, besides you, there are still not specialists on the site who will begin to distribute your posts, passing them off as truth ...
                  1. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 17: 03 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    Quote: helmi8
                    So you do not need to distribute fakes.

                    Come on! What fakes, specifically? What can be out
                    Quote: Vasyan1971
                    I am not a specialist and the pronounced difference between "super" and "hyper" escapes me, except for the linguistic one.

                    Fair.

                    to impersonate as truth? How about your adequacy?
                  2. lucul 23 February 2020 20: 23 New
                    • 4
                    • 1
                    +3
                    I am not a specialist and the pronounced difference between "super" and "hyper" escapes me, except for the linguistic one.

                    Great and powerful Russian language ..... There is such a thing - polysemous words. For example, a crest is also a crest of a wave, this is a comb, this is a cock comb, this is a crest of a rock, etc. It seems to be the same word, but the meanings are different ...
                    Or for example, different synonyms for the word big - it’s too big, it’s huge, it’s huge, it’s giant, it’s colossal and all these are different degrees of the word’s size.
                    Therefore, it is not necessary here to include your Jewish logic and try to make a fly out of an elephant. We met your hutspa more than 1 years ago ....
                  3. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 20: 43 New
                    • 1
                    • 3
                    -2
                    Quote: lucul
                    We met your hutspa more than 1 years ago ....

                    Following his embarrassing, anti-Semitic logic, is some inarticulate anonymous character claiming to be a “high” title of the troll and selflessly arrogating to himself the plural, trying to absolutely call me a Jew? Where did you get burned, poor thing? But do not answer. Just anointing with sour cream - they say it helps.
                  4. lucul 23 February 2020 20: 47 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    Where did you get burned, poor thing?

                    Aha ahah
                    I have long known that you are projecting your thoughts and feelings onto others)))
                    The more often you write this - the juicier I feel your throwing ....
                    Aha-ahah ...
                  5. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 20: 50 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    Quote: lucul
                    Aha ahah

                    Similarly, only three times as long.
                  6. lucul 23 February 2020 20: 58 New
                    • 2
                    • 2
                    0
                    Similarly, only three times as long.

                    Yes, even at 20, otherwise I did not argue with women, and I do not know their verbal tricks, huh))))
                  7. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 23: 09 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    ABOUT! I am no longer a Jew, but a Jew!
                    Drive around the clock, buy sour cream.
  • Grigory_45 23 February 2020 11: 52 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    Quote: Vasyan1971
    I am not a specialist and the pronounced difference between "super" and "hyper" escapes me, except for the linguistic one.

    therefore, technical terms are specific.
    Of course, from the point of view of the Russian language, words, for example, overactivity and hyperactivity are synonymous words. But not with the technical one.
    To describe the speed of the aircraft, the number M is accepted - the Mach number, which means the speed of sound (in our case, in the atmosphere). Aircraft that can fly at speeds above 1M are supersonic. Aircraft that can accelerate and maintain a speed of 5M (5 speeds of sound) and above are hypersonic.
    1. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 12: 22 New
      • 2
      • 6
      -4
      Quote: Gregory_45
      therefore, technical terms are specific.

      Well, so I say: "Not a specialist."
      Spit on the "cons."
      1. Range 23 February 2020 15: 48 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        In fact, knowledge is labeling: leaflet, flower, ... over .., hyper .., duper ... This is the language of accepted conventions. Whoever has the most garbage in his head argues the most. Once they said that the radio does not cost a tank, that’s it, no semiconductors ... And supersonic and hypersonic missiles are a very big difference. Somewhere like that.
        1. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 16: 11 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Quote: Spectrum
          And supersonic and hypersonic missiles are a very big difference.

          Probably. But I think that there is not much difference: they will break my head with a standard pipe or titanium. For me.
          There is a difference for customers, performers and intermediaries. Well, except for boring riveters.
          1. Range 23 February 2020 16: 16 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            The difference is that which one is guaranteed to reach the target and the chances of a hypersonic are an order of magnitude, or maybe several orders of magnitude, greater than that of a supersonic one.
            1. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 16: 22 New
              • 0
              • 3
              -3
              Quote: Spectrum
              The difference is that which one is guaranteed to reach the target

              This is how "lucky". After all, there are still a lot of related factors. Therefore, I still do not see the difference. There is a difference, I agree, for those planning an attack and preparing to defend themselves. I am not one of those and not of the others. And you?
            2. Range 23 February 2020 16: 35 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              So far, mankind has come up with nothing against hypersound. And once a rocket flies enveloped in plasma. then no electronic warfare will help. A maneuvering meteorite flies to itself toward the target and “EVERYTHING” - have time to pray.
            3. Vasyan1971 23 February 2020 16: 40 New
              • 0
              • 5
              -5
              Quote: Spectrum
              So far, mankind has come up with nothing against hypersound.

              The keyword is bye. Do you really think that a "maneuvering meteorite" will arrive (to us, not to us) tomorrow? Since the beginning of the Cold War, how many wunderwafers and counterwunderwaffles have never been used? I sincerely hope that this time will be the same.
      2. Crimean partisan 1974 25 February 2020 08: 39 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And supersonic and hypersonic missiles are a very big difference ...... But I think that there is not much difference: (Vasyan) .... there is sooo big, supersonic is all that is above 334 m per second (plus minus the air environment), hypersound in dynamics is a phenomenon in which the speed of a sound wave a substance turns into a fourth state of aggregation — into a plasma, this phenomenon occurs at speeds of matter from 2000 meters per second (low-temperature plasma) and further higher, total business then, the question is different, how to prevent matter at such speeds ratitsya in plasma
        1. Vasyan1971 25 February 2020 10: 25 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
          hypersound in dynamics is a phenomenon in which the speed of a sound wave, a substance turns into a fourth state of aggregation-in plasma

          This is another matter. A popular explanation for noobs (including me). Short, easy to understand and polite. Not that other louts. Thank! hi
          I take the opportunity then to ask again: in English the terms “supersonic” and “hypersonic” sound like? And then recently I ran into "tread protection." Type of oil. And in aglitski it will not happen so clumsily - "Sacrificial protection".
          Thanks again. hi
        2. Crimean partisan 1974 25 February 2020 10: 42 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And then recently I ran into "tread protection." Type of oil. But in aglitski it will not happen so clumsily - "Sacrificial protection" ..... as if in English it is not strong, but tread oil is, in principle, an additive in oil, for example, there is an additive to oil remmetalik, a pretty good weight. Well, perhaps the most XADO was heard, but I didn’t feel anything. but experienced say that XADO can be filled if the engine or transmission began to drive shavings. that is, it’s practically possible to throw it away, for some time the hado with its ceramics extends the life of the “dead”
        3. Vasyan1971 25 February 2020 11: 14 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
          tread oil is

          Not. "Protective protection" - this is something related to the electro-chemical protection of ship hulls, pipelines, etc. from corrosion. The thing is that "tread" = "protective". And it turns out that "tread protection" = "protective protection". In terms of meaning - "butter oil".
          Quote: Vasyan1971
          And in aglitsky it sounds not so clumsy - "Sacrificial protection".

          However, okay, do not bother with my muddies. hi
  • Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 15: 57 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Quote: Vasyan1971
    Spit on the "cons."

    And this is in vain.
    I have them -70000 and I translate them into the amount we will all cut through and destroy the caps laughing
    And ALL REAL WARRIORS AND PATRIOTS WITH A HOLIDAY!
  • fk7777777 23 February 2020 13: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In short, the speed is 500 m, in the rocket bay, this is the last century ...
  • Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 16: 46 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: Gregory_45
    Aircraft that can fly at speeds above 1M are supersonic. Aircraft that can accelerate and maintain a speed of 5M (5 speeds of sound) and above are hypersonic.

    You're right. Non-technical issues are discussed here. How to get rid of WEAVENSwhen the word ISRAEL appears. AND ITS MODERN ,. ADVANCED ACHIEVEMENTS.
    HAPPY HOLIDAY!
    1. lucul 23 February 2020 20: 26 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      You're right. Non-technical issues are discussed here. And how to get rid of TOAD when the word ISRAEL appears. AND ITS MODERN ,. ADVANCED ACHIEVEMENTS.

      You are absolutely right .... only you replaced the word Russia with the word Israel)))
  • Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 15: 43 New
    • 0
    • 5
    -5
    Quote: helmi8
    If you copy the text, then do not correct it for your "Wishlist". They would have written a hyperlight ... In all sources

    1 I, like you. I take information from the media.
    https://detaly.co.il/zarubezhnye-smi-izrail-primenil-v-sirii-rakety-preodolevayushhie-s-300/
    2 Hypersonic rocket, this pun. More than 12300 km / h in airspace it's hypersound
    The dagger develops 10 MAX at an altitude of 12-15 thousand meters. out of the atmosphere The flight of the rocket takes place at the border of the stratosphere in order to avoid significant air resistance. And if the flight occurred in dense layers of the atmosphere, it would be no more than 5-6
    3 Of all the carriers, this is only the last modernization and in not large Catholicism, the MiG-31K. Which cannot be an interceptor after the alteration.
    4 And if the flight took place in dense layers of the atmosphere, then the speed would be the same 5-6MAX
    which “Rampage” has, plus many more other ultra-modern additives and has been used in combat conditions.
    The carriers are any aircraft of the 4th and 4th generation and there are those who want to buy.
    Development is underway for the F-35
    1. 1976AG 23 February 2020 15: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Hypersonic speed from 5 Machs and higher is considered to be. Where did you get 12000 km / h is unclear.
      1. Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 16: 04 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        Quote: 1976AG
        Where did you get 12000 km / h is unclear.

        Rights clerical BEFORE 12300 km / h.
        Sorry
        At the speeds that they are capable of developing. Supersound is from 1230 to 6150 km / h, а hypersound - from 6150 to 12300 km / h. There is also the so-called "fast hypersound" (12300-30740 km / h), but it is precisely military rockets that have not yet been developed.
        1. 1976AG 23 February 2020 16: 30 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          When talking about the speed of sound, the exact numbers usually do not indicate, since they are different for different heights
    2. Crimean partisan 1974 25 February 2020 14: 36 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And if the flight took place in dense layers of the atmosphere, then the speed would be the same 5-6MAX
      which “Rampage” has ....... if you believe the official sources, the speed of the renovations almost falls short of the speed of sound, that is, just 320 m per second, approximately like a grenade launcher and in no way can it be 5-6M, so who lies you or the marketing and business development director of the MALAM group of the IAI concern Amit Khaimovich ??? that's why for some reason I crept in that you're lying vitalik
  • Concept1 23 February 2020 13: 18 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    “Rampage is a high-precision hypersonic air-to-ground missile
    "Rampage" is an over sound rocket.
  • Grigory_45 23 February 2020 16: 09 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: Vitaly Gusin
    Rampage is a high-precision long-range hypersonic missile of the air-ground class

    Rampage - Israeli supersonic air-to-surface missile with a range of up to 150 km. Max. speed - up to 3M (exact values ​​are not known), dives onto the target at a speed of up to 550 m / s (up to 2000 km / h). Where is the hypersonic rocket ???
    1. Mestny 23 February 2020 17: 45 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      In Jewish fantasies on the topic "Whatever these Russians came up with, we have long had it and better."
      They then for a long time, with difficulty the whole world prove that this is a Jewish lie. They even sometimes agree. More precisely, they drift into the bushes as usual in the case of a hint of loss.
      But the sediment then remains. What was required
      1. Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 18: 24 New
        • 0
        • 6
        -6
        Quote: Mestny
        In Jewish fantasies on the topic “Whatever these Russians came up with, we have already had it for a long time and better”

        https://www.mil.by/ru/news/84804/
        https://lenta.ru/news/2019/02/25/rocks/
        Israel showed its SECOND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!"Dagger"
        In Jewish fantasies on the topic "Whatever these Russians came up with, we have long had it and better."
        Where are the fantasies?
        10 MIG-31 with "Daggers" or in 465 F-15, F-16? Which can take 1860 missiles
        Quote: Mestny
        More precisely, they drift into the bushes as usual in the case of a hint of loss.
        But the sediment then remains. What was required

        NO OBJECTION laughing
        1. Mestny 23 February 2020 18: 40 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Yes, what are the objections.
          To argue with you - a pound of salt should be devoured. It's easier to spit and wave your hand.
          This site is still Russian. And it discusses Russian achievements ..
          Not Jewish or American.
          1. Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 19: 09 New
            • 0
            • 3
            -3
            Read, Shura, read!
            lol
          2. aszzz888 25 February 2020 01: 38 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Mestny (Sergey) February 23, 2020 18:40
            +6
            Yes, what are the objections.
            To argue with you - a pound of salt should be devoured. It's easier to spit and wave your hand.
            This site is still Russian. And it discusses Russian achievements ..
            Not Jewish or American.
            Sergei! hi I ask you, do not rush about the bisser before ..., well, you yourself know before whom, or rather before WHAT. It is not worth it. It wound up here, and gets his own, to put it mildly, EuGeian achievements)) laughing May it be exiled in Israel. Yours faithfully!
        2. lucul 23 February 2020 20: 30 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          465 F-15, F-16? Which can take 1860 missiles

          Aha-ahah and with a range of 150 km))))
          What will you do with this 150 km? ))))
          When does the enemy have more long-range missiles? )))
          1. Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 21: 56 New
            • 0
            • 4
            -4
            This is another topic.
            I wrote about two Israeli "daggers."
            And about the duration of the defeat, let's talk another time.
            1. Sky strike fighter 23 February 2020 22: 44 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin
              This is another topic.
              I wrote about two Israeli "daggers."
              And about the duration of the defeat, let's talk another time.

              Your Israeli "daggers" are inferior in range to missiles with a similar speed (up to 3 Mach), armed with the VKS X-31PD (260 km). There the warhead of the rocket is also 150 kg. I'm not talking about comparing a 10 Mach missile medium range (up to 2000 km) with tactical supersonic Israeli counterparts of our X-31PD complete nonsense.
    2. Sky strike fighter 23 February 2020 23: 03 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      And if you dig deeper, then this is what happens.
      The Rampage solid-fuel rocket has a mass of 570 kg, the warhead with a mass of 120 kg can be of two types - penetrating high-explosive (for attacking concrete shelters and protected objects) and high-explosive fragmentation (for ground weakly protected targets). The launch range is 150 km, the speed is 1096 km / h (0,95 Mach numbers), and the CVO is 10 meters. A combined inertial-satellite satellite with the addition of a GPS anti-jamming system is used as a guidance system. The flight to the target Rampage carries out on an aeroballistic trajectory, which can be adjusted according to the ANN and GPS-receiver.
      If you look at the history of the creation of this rocket, it turns out that it was created on the basis of the MARS (Multi-Purpose, Air-Launched Rocket System) adjustable rocket by the Israeli company IMI Systems. In February 2012, at an exhibition in Singapore, IMI Systems showed it as an adjustable munition based on the EXTRA (Extended Range Artillery) MLRS rocket of 306 mm caliber (mass 450 kg, range 30-150 km, warhead 120 kg, INS + GPS, KVO 10 m). Coincidence? I don’t think so.
      In the bottom line, we have an air-launched MLRS missile, to which we added a GPS protection block from interceptions.

      https://rg.ru/2019/04/20/iarost-cenoiu-v-shekel-izrailskaia-raketa-ne-obmanet-sistemy-pvo-rf.html
    3. Sky strike fighter 23 February 2020 23: 05 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      And if you dig deeper, then this is what happens.
      The Rampage solid-fuel rocket has a mass of 570 kg, the warhead with a mass of 120 kg can be of two types - penetrating high-explosive (for attacking concrete shelters and protected objects) and high-explosive fragmentation (for ground weakly protected targets). The launch range is 150 km, the speed is 1096 km / h (0,95 Mach numbers), and the CVO is 10 meters. A combined inertial-satellite satellite with the addition of a GPS anti-jamming system is used as a guidance system. The flight to the target Rampage carries out on an aeroballistic trajectory, which can be adjusted according to the ANN and GPS-receiver.
      If you look at the history of the creation of this rocket, it turns out that it was created on the basis of the MARS (Multi-Purpose, Air-Launched Rocket System) adjustable rocket by the Israeli company IMI Systems. In February 2012, at an exhibition in Singapore, IMI Systems showed it as an adjustable munition based on the EXTRA (Extended Range Artillery) MLRS rocket of 306 mm caliber (mass 450 kg, range 30-150 km, warhead 120 kg, INS + GPS, KVO 10 m). Coincidence? I don’t think so.
      In the bottom line, we have an air-launched MLRS missile, to which we added a GPS protection block from interceptions.

      https://rg.ru/2019/04/20/iarost-cenoiu-v-shekel-izrailskaia-raketa-ne-obmanet-sistemy-pvo-rf.html
    4. Sky strike fighter 23 February 2020 23: 09 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Gregory_45
      Quote: Vitaly Gusin
      Rampage is a high-precision long-range hypersonic missile of the air-ground class

      Rampage - Israeli supersonic air-to-surface missile with a range of up to 150 km. Max. speed - up to 3M (exact values ​​are not known), dives onto the target at a speed of up to 550 m / s (up to 2000 km / h). Where is the hypersonic rocket ???

      And if you dig deeper, then this is what happens.
      The Rampage solid-fuel rocket has a mass of 570 kg, the warhead with a mass of 120 kg can be of two types - penetrating high-explosive (for attacking concrete shelters and protected objects) and high-explosive fragmentation (for ground weakly protected targets). The launch range is 150 km, the speed is 1096 km / h (0,95 Mach numbers), and the CVO is 10 meters. A combined inertial-satellite satellite with the addition of a GPS anti-jamming system is used as a guidance system. The flight to the target Rampage carries out on an aeroballistic trajectory, which can be adjusted according to the ANN and GPS-receiver.
      If you look at the history of the creation of this rocket, it turns out that it was created on the basis of the MARS (Multi-Purpose, Air-Launched Rocket System) adjustable rocket by the Israeli company IMI Systems. In February 2012, at an exhibition in Singapore, IMI Systems showed it as an adjustable munition based on the EXTRA (Extended Range Artillery) MLRS rocket of 306 mm caliber (mass 450 kg, range 30-150 km, warhead 120 kg, INS + GPS, KVO 10 m). Coincidence? I don’t think so.
      In the bottom line, we have an air-launched MLRS missile, to which we added a GPS protection block from interceptions.

      https://rg.ru/2019/04/20/iarost-cenoiu-v-shekel-izrailskaia-raketa-ne-obmanet-sistemy-pvo-rf.html
  • Imperial Technocrat 23 February 2020 17: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Supersonic, not hypersonic
  • NEXUS 24 February 2020 01: 55 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Vitaly Gusin
    "" Rampage "- a high-precision long-range hypersonic missile air-to-ground

    Since when did a rocket flying at 700 m / s, that is, a little more than 2 max, become hypersonic? Ale, expert!
    Hypersound begins with 5 max, miracle.
    Second ... from which hangover did you attribute this product to long-range missiles? 150 km on a stationary target is super long range?
    The Jews sculpted this missile in the hope of somehow fighting the Russian air defense systems and its main feature is stealth. But however, when using it against our complexes in Syria, most of them were intercepted ..
    Judging by the results of applying Rampage, its effectiveness was low. Her strike was successfully repelled by anti-aircraft missile systems available to the Syrian army. Moreover, only a small part of them reached the goal, most of the missiles were shot down in the air

    This rubbish is not something that can not be called a new weapon, but also to rank it as something quite effective too.
    And this product is mounted on the external nodes of the suspension, in contrast to the internal fuselage rocket and much more compact.
    As for the rocket, which is mentioned in the article, it is not known on which section it accelerates to hypersound and along which path it goes to the target. Second ... what is its range, if we take into account the radius of target acquisition by air defense systems. That is, the radius of action missiles should be no less than one and a half times, or even two times the radius of action of air defense systems, otherwise there is no sense, since the fighter must be protected from return fire from air defense systems. And if so, then the range of this missile should be approximately 300-500 km.
  • Ross xnumx 23 February 2020 10: 48 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Xambo
    Secretly and correctly do that keep quiet .. And now here curious "comrades" from one small, but cunning country will run ..

    good
    The best option is when they learn about a new weapon only after its practical application. But it is not customary to devote the latest weapons of various "partners" to the technical specifications - this is not to be "measured" ... yes
    1. Mestny 23 February 2020 17: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Not always.
      There is also the informational part of the war. Here, for example, the US Army is acting quite the opposite - at all angles it is touting its future weapons. At the same time, no one will call her weak.
  • KCA
    KCA 23 February 2020 09: 08 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    Was there any specifics on the latest weapons, especially on missiles? The exact data is provided for export samples, but hypersound for export will not work for ten years.
    1. Ross xnumx 23 February 2020 10: 52 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      Quote: KCA
      The exact data is given for export samples, but hypersound for export for ten years will definitely not go

      You shouldn’t be so! By golly, in vain ...

      Partners do not want to buy. They are offered, but they in no way ... wassat
      1. Vlad5307 23 February 2020 10: 58 New
        • 6
        • 9
        -3
        Putin so hesitated with a serious look over the military-industrial complex of the FSA, and that’s all, and you so naively believed the seriousness of his proposal. laughing
        1. Ross xnumx 23 February 2020 11: 01 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Quote: Vlad5307
          and you so naively believed in the seriousness of his proposal.

          Judging by the inserted emoticon: wassat you could understand my banter ...
          hi
          1. Vlad5307 23 February 2020 11: 32 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Sorry, laughed - the smile did not notice. Happy Holiday! good
        2. cherkas.oe 23 February 2020 11: 30 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Vlad5307
          and you so naively believed in the seriousness of his proposal.

          Yes, he, as you say, hesitated, only for some reason you took his banter seriously laughing
  • Thrifty 23 February 2020 09: 09 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Thrall - you like to watch lol so when it’s pouring past you, at least take a photo for memory lol
    1. Evil543 23 February 2020 09: 28 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      But how to take a picture of it, is it intra-fuselage? belay
      1. Thrifty 23 February 2020 10: 16 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Evil543 -Let him ask her to be launched, take a picture, and the plane will drive the rocket back into the weapons compartment-through the blue whistle 3 times in a row! lol
        1. Evil543 23 February 2020 10: 23 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          If so then yes laughing
    2. rich 23 February 2020 11: 11 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Thrifty: Thrall - you like to watch lol so when it flies past you, at least take a photo for memory lol :

      Better yet, take a selfie
  • aszzz888 23 February 2020 09: 49 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Thrall Today, 09: 00
    0
    No specifics.
    I think it's too early to talk about any specifics of the new missile, because it is classified. The time will come to know. wink
    1. Ross xnumx 23 February 2020 10: 55 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: aszzz888
      I think it's too early to talk about any specifics of the new missile, because it is classified. The time will come to know.

      Do not forget the practice of Soviet times. The enemy learned about new developments when the designers mastered the latest designs.
      With regard to weapons for the Russian Armed Forces there should not be any specifics at all, because - "not hell" ... laughing
      1. aszzz888 23 February 2020 12: 04 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        ROSS 42 (Yuri Vasilievich) Today, 10:55
        0
        Quote: aszzz888
        I think it's too early to talk about any specifics of the new missile, because it is classified. The time will come to know.

        Do not forget the practice of Soviet times. The enemy learned about new developments when the designers mastered the latest designs.
        With regard to weapons for the Russian Armed Forces, there should not be any specifics at all, because - “not hell” ... laughing
        Here I am for ensuring that this does not happen now.
      2. Winnie76 23 February 2020 13: 08 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: ROSS 42
        With regard to weapons for the Russian Armed Forces there should not be any specifics at all, because - "not hell" ...

        But what about export? We have such a rocket, but we won’t tell about it. Oh, got it. It is necessary to throw junk into the market. T 55 or Mig21. Here we will conquer the whole market. That's where our military-industrial complex in chocolate with his head
    2. Krasnoyarsk 23 February 2020 14: 18 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      Quote: aszzz888
      I think it's too early to talk about any specifics of the new missile, because it is classified. The time will come to know.

      It's not about secrecy. They will be adopted. you can tell - accepted for service ... hereinafter, that's it, period. And no specifics. we don't need her.
      And to report that is developed, but not tested, why? Why this information trash?
      1. aszzz888 24 February 2020 01: 35 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Krasnoyarsk Yesterday, 14:18
        0
        Quote: aszzz888
        I think it's too early to talk about any specifics of the new missile, because it is classified. The time will come to know.

        It's not about secrecy. They will be adopted. you can tell - accepted for service ... hereinafter, that's it, period. And no specifics. we don't need her.
        And to report that is developed, but not tested, why? Why this information trash?
        I do not consider such information “garbage”. Useful for general development ... yes, and not everything in the world is only white and black.
        1. Krasnoyarsk 24 February 2020 11: 15 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          Quote: aszzz888
          Good for general development ... yes,

          I see how your intelligence has developed after reading the information that the rocket is there, though it has not yet been tested.
          I directly envy your success in development.
          1. aszzz888 24 February 2020 11: 18 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Krasnoyarsk Today, 11:15 AM NEW
            0
            Quote: aszzz888
            Good for general development ... yes,

            I see how your intelligence has developed after reading the information that the rocket is there, though it has not yet been tested.
            Straight I envy Your success in development.
            Envy is a bad feeling. And for my intellect, please do not worry - he is quite satisfied with ME. hi
            1. Krasnoyarsk 24 February 2020 11: 42 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              Quote: aszzz888
              And for my intellect, please do not worry - he is quite satisfied with ME.

              Yes, who would doubt it. hi
              1. aszzz888 25 February 2020 02: 50 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Krasnoyarsk Yesterday, 11:42
                0
                Quote: aszzz888
                And for my intellect, please do not worry - he is quite satisfied with ME.

                Yes, who would doubt it. hi
                And your doubts don't interest me. hi
  • Ros 56 23 February 2020 10: 14 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Nobody canceled military secrets.
  • Vol4ara 23 February 2020 10: 18 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    It used to be nano, now it's hyper. Popping wherever you go
    1. bessmertniy 23 February 2020 10: 53 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The main thing is that the rocket will be, and the role of the SU-57 will grow significantly.
  • svp67 23 February 2020 11: 14 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: Thrall
    No specifics.

    But why?
    Class: air-to-surface
    Speed: Hypersonic
    Dimensions: allow placing in the internal compartments of the SU-57, meaning significantly less than the "Dagger"
    Considering that they plan to make the SU-57 inconspicuous, it is clear that this type of missile will prove to be very useful for destroying air defense systems and systems, as well as the enemy’s CP.
    1. lucul 23 February 2020 20: 33 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      it is clear that this type of missile will be very useful for destroying air defense systems and systems, as well as enemy CP.

      Yes against enemy radars / air defense - yes with a flight range of, say, 500 km - just perfect)))
  • Krasnoyarsk 23 February 2020 14: 13 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: Thrall
    No specifics.

    = Not yet passed flight tests =
    The chicken is still in the nest, and the testicle .....
    But she, unlike ..., still does not cackle. Here is someone to take an example from.
  • smile 24 February 2020 00: 34 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Thrall
    right ......
    But....
    Outstanding T64 tank - from the moment of the driving prototype until adoption - 14 years ....
    from the moment the Raptor took off - until it was put into service and mass production - 14 years ....
    f 35 - from the moment of take-off to mass production - 13 years .....
    our fifth-generation fighter has already begun to be mass-produced - even though the first ship was broken ... - but time is ten years ....
    the torn Armata — also ten years — faster than in the USSR — in any case — faster than the revolutionary T64 — I want to hear those who often flutter ... polymers — why real Russia should be less successful than the USSR, Either let spiteful comrades will explain - what the hell, they, all such opposition ones, criticizing armature and SU 57, forget that we have a similar technique, that our enemies have about the same number of years before the introduction ... yeah ours, the campaign is even faster, but why are the ixperds unhappy? :))))
    1. Salty 24 February 2020 00: 49 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Quote: smile
      why are iksperdy unhappy?

      Options: 1 - do not know the subject, 2 - really do not like today's Russia. Linear combinations 1 and 2 are possible)))
  • V.I.P. 23 February 2020 09: 04 New
    • 6
    • 17
    -11
    Well, let's see when this rocket will undergo state tests, when it will be put into service, when they will start to purchase and how many pieces will be bought ... And it can, like the majority of new products only for exhibitions and parades)))) .....
    1. Thrifty 23 February 2020 09: 11 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      VIP-rocket in the parade will go under its own power? And, at what exhibition will the secret product be shown to you, and even TTX will it be published? ????
      1. bars1 23 February 2020 10: 05 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        In the plot on TV, it is quite possible to show. Take, for example, the secret planning block, Vanguard. '' It is possible to show it to American representatives, but it is impossible for the citizens of the Russian Federation, you see the secrecy! Not fair.
        1. fk7777777 23 February 2020 13: 19 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Yes, you can, let them look in the window, maybe they will see ...
  • Warrior MorePhoto 23 February 2020 09: 08 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    I hope that they will be there a couple)
  • bars1 23 February 2020 10: 00 New
    • 5
    • 6
    -1
    Again, probably aeroballistic. But everyone is waiting for the scramjet. A hypersonic rocket in the classical sense.
    1. bars1 23 February 2020 10: 51 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Why put two minuses ?!
      1. Mountain shooter 23 February 2020 11: 15 New
        • 10
        • 4
        +6
        In order not to "wait for the scramjet ..." The difference in these engines is only in the fuel supply ... From the point of view of combat qualities, this affects only the FAR. However, it should be noted that Russian chemists in solid fuels have clearly made a “breakthrough”. The ranges of many small-sized missiles have substantially increased. Especially in air defense. So, if we are talking about hypersonic missiles of the tactical level - IMHO, it is not very important what engine the HYPERSONIC missile has. It is important that it flies at hypersonic speed laughing
        1. Grigory_45 23 February 2020 12: 04 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          In order not to "wait for the scramjet ..." The difference in these engines is only in the fuel supply ... From the point of view of combat qualities, this affects only the FAR

          not only at range, but also at speed. And on the ability to perform maneuvers.
          In order to maintain speed (and especially in the final section, for the high probability of a successful air defense / missile breakout), the engine operating time should be long (and not like Iskander or Dagger acceleration and flight along a ballistic trajectory by inertia) - almost before the rocket hits the int. This is a motor way to maintain hypersonic speed. So far, all experiments in this area have ended in failure. So far in service - aeroballistic missiles. And for this you put an opponent a minus? Or to yourself, for not understanding the topic?

          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          It is important that it flies at hypersonic speed

          It is important that it flies most of the trajectory at this speed, and not in a short active section.
          1. Mountain shooter 23 February 2020 12: 19 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            Quote: Gregory_45

            It is important that it flies most of the trajectory at this speed, and not in a short active section.

            And at what speed is the Iskander warhead approaching the target? On an idle engine?
            How much M? Therefore - it is not necessary to exaggerate ... Yes, and turbojet engines can now set dual-mode ... In which the time is long. And in general, I’m glad to meet a specialist in hypersonic weapons ... I always liked the ability of “partners” to manipulate the achievements of the military-industrial complex with the help of terminology ... Hypersonic missiles are not ammunition with speeds of more than 5 M ... A only with scramjet !!! In terms of GOALS - is there a difference? wink
            1. Grigory_45 23 February 2020 12: 54 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Mountain Shooter
              And at what speed is the Iskander warhead approaching the target?

              The IS velocity of the Iskander complex at the target is 700-800 m / s

              Quote: Mountain Shooter
              On an idle engine?

              of course. Fuel has long been burned out, a rocket flies along a ballistic trajectory.

              Quote: Mountain Shooter
              Therefore - do not exaggerate

              I brought you the well-known Iskander for the complex, in the part in which you requested. Therefore, the claim is not to me, but to the developers.

              Quote: Mountain Shooter
              Hypersonic missiles are not ammunition with speeds of more than 5 M ... But only with the scramjet !!! In terms of GOALS - is there a difference?

              terminology must be applied correctly. The Iskander complex has ballistic missiles, the Dagger has aeroballistic missiles. Both are not hypersonic, although at the end of the active section they have such a speed. Nobody calls hypersonic anti-aircraft missiles of the same S-300/400, although at the end of the march section some types of SAMs have a speed of more than 5M.

              For the purpose - also matters. Which rocket is harder to intercept - one that goes at a speed of 2600 km / h, or one that goes at 6000 km / h? I think so. The answer is obvious.
              1. Mountain shooter 23 February 2020 13: 07 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                Quote: Gregory_45
                For the purpose - also matters. Which rocket is harder to intercept - one that goes at a speed of 2600 km / h, or one that goes at 60000 km / h? I think so. The answer is obvious.

                I believe an important parameter is the time that the approaching ammunition leaves to the air defense system for its defeat. And not the absolute velocity of the ammunition at the target. Another second - another? And the argument is very "theoretical" ... If the Iskander missiles are practically not affected by military air defense, then what is the Dagger worse? And is there a scramjet or not at the Zircons - I repeat, from the point of view of the GOAL, it is practically the same.
                1. Grigory_45 23 February 2020 13: 12 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  Quote: Mountain Shooter
                  I believe an important parameter is the time that the approaching ammunition leaves to the air defense system for its defeat. And not the absolute velocity of the ammunition at the target.

                  so there’s a direct relationship - the higher the speed (all other things being equal), the less time the enemy has to react
                  And one more nuance - the higher the target’s speed, the fewer means of destruction the enemy possesses (if he has anything at all), capable of intercepting (destroying) a hypersonic object
          2. fk7777777 23 February 2020 13: 23 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            How long is it ?, the operating time of the engine of a simple anti-ship missile is only 5 hours, and taking into account that it is checked before launch and stored in warehouses, everything is possible, and even more so, it is checked (included) when it is received and delivered to the warehouse. So ..., only you can take a word for it ....
        2. lucul 23 February 2020 20: 39 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          However, it should be noted that Russian solid fuel chemists have clearly made a “breakthrough”.

          So it is ... we are the "Soviet" chemists who slowed down this direction during the USSR, sent to Israel in 1991. And our home-grown Russian chemists were finally able to close the gap.
          1. Mountain shooter 23 February 2020 20: 49 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: lucul
            So it is ... we are the "Soviet" chemists who slowed down this direction during the USSR, sent to Israel in 1991. And our home-grown Russian chemists were finally able to close the gap.

            And so the new “Willow” (MANPADS, if anyone doesn’t know) has a reach of 5 km, unlike the Igla, from 3.5 ... probably not everyone has left for Israel? Or new ones wound up?
      2. Voyager 23 February 2020 14: 42 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Because this "classical understanding" has not yet been formed due to the lack of real examples.
    2. Grigory_45 23 February 2020 11: 59 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: bars1
      Again, probably aeroballistic.

      as an option - a modern version of the X-15
  • Jurkovs 23 February 2020 10: 12 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Such a missile makes sense to destroy only the radar and air defense positions.
    1. bars1 23 February 2020 10: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0

      Jurkovsjustify, please.
      1. Jurkovs 24 February 2020 06: 30 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        They don’t even shoot at the sparrows.
    2. Ross xnumx 23 February 2020 10: 58 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Jurkovs
      Such a missile makes sense to destroy only the radar and air defense positions.

      Can a “boat” be sunk in the sea? wassat
    3. fk7777777 23 February 2020 13: 25 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Do you think the maxim machine gun is enough for such purposes? ...
  • Whalebone 23 February 2020 10: 44 New
    • 5
    • 15
    -10
    The main thing in propaganda is to use the word "hypersound" more often. Hurricanes quickly get excited and wave full of holes, while the “partners” tremble and fear. The goal is achieved. You can go eat at the restaurant. Belarusian lobster and Moldavian brut.
  • nnz226 23 February 2020 12: 13 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Why shouldn’t the air swing ??? Rocket created! Created - this is when adopted into service! And so - right by the proverb: "Chicken is perched, eggs are in the tail, and now they are selling chickens in the market!"
  • Operator 23 February 2020 13: 08 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The length of the internal arms bays of the Su-57 is about 4 meters, so that the starting weight of the air-to-ground missile can be estimated at 400 kg. The rocket is equipped with a solid propellant rocket propeller, which at the time of fuel burnup provides a hypersonic speed of ~ 6M (6400 km / h), after which the rocket flies by inertia with a speed drop to supersonic> 5M.

    When the rocket moves from hypersound to supersonic, an active radar seeker is switched on, which provides homing to the target. Additionally, the rocket can homing on a source of radio emission such as a radar.
  • Incvizitor 23 February 2020 13: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If only they could write a range, it’s interesting after all ...
  • Old26 23 February 2020 13: 51 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Gregory_45
    It is important that it flies most of the trajectory at this speed, and not in a short active section.

    It is still unknown what part of the trajectory will be at this speed. BОless or less. Most likely smaller. And most likely it will be a rocket with a conventional rocket engine
  • Alexey from Perm 23 February 2020 17: 22 New
    • 0
    • 4
    -4
    10 years will pass, after which it is possible and will be adopted. The military review is similar in its propaganda impulse to the sayings of a fascist moron.
  • eai
    eai 23 February 2020 17: 37 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    How much do they pay for such nonsense on the site? Need specifics in letters and numbers! Block the admins of such bloggers.
  • Vitaly gusin 23 February 2020 17: 44 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    https://www.mil.by/ru/news/84804/
    https://lenta.ru/news/2019/02/25/rocks/
    Israel showed its SECOND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!"Dagger"
    01.03.2019
    Israeli military-industrial company Rafael Advanced Defense Systems during the exhibition Aero India, held from February 20 to 24 in Bangalore (India), introduced the Rocks aeroballistic missile, reports Jane's 360.
    The British publication notes that the weapon received a solid-fuel engine, satellite and inertial navigation systems, as well as electro-optical and infrared guidance systems at the terminal site. A feature of a single-stage air-to-ground missile is the ability to operate under jamming conditions of a GPS signal.
    Rocks, which received a penetrating or high-explosive fragmentation warhead, was tested on the fourth-generation Israeli fighter F-16I Sufa, which is capable of carrying up to four of these missiles. Detailed weapon characteristics are not reported.
    In June 2018, Israeli companies IMI (Israel Military Industries) and IAI (Israel Aerospace Industries) announced on the creation of a supersonic Rampage air-to-surface rocket. It was noted that the missile range is 150 kilometers, the length is 4,7 meters, the mass of the warhead is 150 kilograms. The missile should enter service in 2019.
    At present, Russia, China and Israel possess aeroballistic missiles. In particular, the first has a Dagger complex, first introduced by President Vladimir Putin in March 2018.
    ANSWERED TO ALL
    ALL MINUSES TRANSFERED TO MONEY
    LEARN TO READ
  • eai
    eai 23 February 2020 17: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And now with the holiday ...
  • Petrol cutter 24 February 2020 17: 27 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    What specifics are there? About such things generally need to be silent fiercely. People are engaged, and let them be engaged. May God give them health.
  • lvov_aleksey 26 February 2020 00: 06 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    no specifics needed, I'm happy for our military commissar ....