In the USA, they are working out the actions in case of a Russian nuclear strike on Europe

47

The possibility of a Russian nuclear strike on US bases in Europe is very scary for both America’s European allies and Washington itself. The other day, the United States conducted exercises to test the response in the event of a nuclear strike.

The Pentagon representative spoke about small military exercises conducted at a training ground in Nebraska. According to the scenario of the exercises, Russia attacked short-range missiles with military facilities of the North Atlantic Alliance in Europe. The decision on retaliatory actions in such a situation is made by the president and the US Secretary of Defense. According to the plan of the exercises, the response was a nuclear strike on Russian territory.



For the United States and its European NATO allies, the topic of Russia's nuclear attack is very painful. It is no accident that short-range nuclear missiles were deployed on submarines of the United States Navy, as it recently became known. Moreover, the Pentagon did not hide the fact that this is being done to deter Russia, although it is not going to attack European countries or launch nuclear strikes against them.

At the same time, the USA does not plan to deploy additional nuclear weapons in Europe weapon low power. But in response to the termination of the INF Treaty, the United States intends to deploy ballistic and cruise missiles in several European countries. Naturally, the need for such a solution is explained by concern for the security of the US European allies. At the same time, it can be assumed that the United States will increase the number of weapons, military equipment and personnel directly at the eastern borders of the NATO bloc, that is, in Romania, Poland and the Baltic countries. It is these five states that now form the basis of the eastern flank of the North Atlantic Alliance.

Interestingly, unlike the countries of Western Europe, in Eastern Europe, political elites and many ordinary citizens welcome the deployment of American missiles. For example, in Poland Russophobia has reached such an extent that neither the government of the country, nor a significant part of the townsfolk want to hear about all the risks associated with the deployment of American missiles. The fact that their country could suffer very seriously in the event of a retaliatory strike is of little concern to anti-Russian chauvinists. It is much more important for them to rattle with arms, play a war and once again demonstrate to the world the famous "Polish pride". The Baltic countries adhere to approximately the same model of behavior, which, on the contrary, constantly ask the United States and NATO to increase their military presence on their territory.

In Germany, France, Italy, politicians have a more balanced and wise position. For example, many German politicians do not hide the fact that they would like the withdrawal of American troops from the territory of Germany. And they associate the risks of delivering missile attacks from Russia precisely with the presence of American military bases on the territory of the country.

Currently, American nuclear weapons are deployed at bases in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Turkey. But Ankara has recently not been considered a reliable ally by the American leadership. Therefore, nuclear weapons are gradually being removed from the Turkish Incirlik military base, moving it, most likely, to the Devesela military base in Romania, although of course no one officially declares this.

It should be understood that even if the Pentagon reports that it will not deploy new nuclear weapons in Europe, such statements should not be believed. The U.S. Department of Defense can safely, pretending that nothing is happening, secretly move missiles with nuclear warheads to their military bases. While such a scenario may still not pass with countries such as Germany or the Netherlands, because there is public opinion, there are politicians who are negatively inclined even to existing US military facilities, then in Eastern Europe everything is much simpler in this regard - and the authorities do not mind , and public opinion with the help of thoroughly anti-Russian media has long been prepared.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    22 February 2020 09: 18
    When God wants to punish a person, he robs his mind! As for the retaliatory strike against Russia because of its bases in Europe, the maximum that the United States will do is by striking at our bases outside the Russian Federation.
    1. 0
      22 February 2020 09: 30
      And what do we do?
      1. +2
        22 February 2020 09: 41
        Clap your hands.
      2. +1
        22 February 2020 13: 03
        Quote: Ilya-spb
        And what do we do?

        To develop the Navy and on an ongoing basis go near the coast of our potential enemy.
        Which - no, but there will be parity according to the flight time. hi
    2. +7
      22 February 2020 12: 16
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      the maximum that the United States will do is strike at our bases outside the Russian Federation

      Exchange> 200 of its bases in Europe for two Syrian and Armenian bases in the Russian Federation? It's not even funny ...
      According to the plan of the exercises, the response was a nuclear strike on Russian territory

      But this is more likely. Another thing is that our blow to the United States will not be retaliatory, as in their wet dreams, but retaliatory-oncoming or even preventive.
      It is no accident that short-range nuclear missiles were deployed on submarines of the United States Navy, as it recently became known.

      Short-range ICBM? Can it still have reduced power (so-called "fizzy")?
      The U.S. Department of Defense can safely, pretending nothing is happening, secretly move missiles with nuclear warheads to its military bases

      What missiles are we talking about? In the USA, tactical nuclear weapons remained only in the form of free-falling B61. The rest is discarded long ago and disposed of.
      The author is requested not to write on topics about which he has the most superficial understanding.
      1. 0
        22 February 2020 13: 00
        Quote: Fedor Egoist
        Short-range ICBM? Can it still have reduced power (so-called "fizzy")?

        Most likely with reduced power. Short-range ICBMs are something new. The States announced a project of low-power charges on their boats. hi
  2. +1
    22 February 2020 09: 18
    The Pentagon representative spoke about small military exercises conducted at a training ground in Nebraska.
    And then I thought that they had "trained" in Iraq ... Have they already stopped the "counter of the number of wounded" or not yet?
    1. -1
      22 February 2020 09: 36
      As far as I know, there were specially reserved places for mass graves in the event of a nuclear conflict.
      1. +1
        22 February 2020 10: 28
        Mass graves can be in the event of a natural disaster and a social explosion.
  3. 0
    22 February 2020 09: 31
    In the USA, they are working out the actions in case of a Russian nuclear strike on Europe

    Wear gas masks and lie down in the direction of Europe?
    1. +6
      22 February 2020 09: 39
      Something they are increasingly hoping for Europe that it should be a blow. what But this may turn out to be a mistake, and then what is the use of these teachings. request
      1. +7
        22 February 2020 09: 56
        Perhaps the US military believes that a possible nuclear war will be limited and will not go beyond Europe. I see no other reason request
      2. +7
        22 February 2020 10: 01
        Quote: bessmertniy
        Something they are increasingly hoping for Europe that it should be a blow. what But this may be a mistake, and then what is the use of these teachings. request

        In order to force Russia to launch a nuclear attack on Europe, it is necessary to try very hard, more specifically to mattresses. Well, if the mattresses achieve this, then most likely the blow will be inflicted not only on Europe, but also on the United States as the main provocateur and initiator of the conflict. It seems that they can’t work out safely outside the puddle.
        1. +2
          22 February 2020 10: 12
          They still think in the old fashioned way - that they will be able to somehow sit out over the oceans. And today, for us, the oceans are not a hindrance. hi
  4. -14
    22 February 2020 09: 39
    Lavrov Shoigu is calling after an appeal from President Fed. meeting and says: - Listen, Kozhugetovich, do not hit New York, I have a daughter there. Shoigu replies: “Yes, I know. Matvienko also called about the United States.” Mizulina asked not to hit Belgium, Zhirinovsky - to Switzerland, and Zheleznyak - to London. Our others called, the list is really big ... ... Pause. Listen, Lavrov, where to hit then, in which case? - Mmm, well, the character of Wuhan. And we will help the Chinese Communists. And save face.
    1. +4
      22 February 2020 10: 16
      prapor shmalnet - if the reptilian buttons do not turn off ...
    2. +3
      22 February 2020 11: 58
      Quote: Olya Tsako
      Mmm, well, Wuhan character.

      Well, you have bad jokes in Ukraine.
      1. +4
        22 February 2020 15: 23
        This is a twisted bearded joke about Voronezh, in which there are no Kremlin relatives. He is already a meme about 7-8 years old
    3. +1
      22 February 2020 18: 55
      Olya, Olya .... The crisis of the genre? Honestly, not funny .... From the word "in general" ...
  5. 0
    22 February 2020 09: 40
    Fools, I would not want to, but in which case there will be two blows both in Europe and in the states at the same time, as in decision centers. Are they really so stupid that they cannot remember the words of GDP.
  6. +3
    22 February 2020 09: 55
    And why do we need to deliver a nuclear strike on densely populated Europe. Without the United States there is no military force there and will not be in the near future. Beat so immediately across the United States. And Europe is simple, to the English Channel ... tongue
  7. +1
    22 February 2020 09: 56
    The actions of the Americans in the event of a nuclear strike of the Russian Federation from two points:
    1. Wrap yourself in a white sheet.
    2. Move towards the cemetery.
  8. +8
    22 February 2020 10: 04
    So weird these Americans. Or stupid, I can’t understand. It would be better to work out actions in the event of a strike against the United States. Because it will fly on them in the first place. In Europe, only threatening facilities can be destroyed, and even cities spared. Because, after nothing is left of America, Europe itself will die safely. Therefore - the bulk of the missiles - to the states!
    Naive elves hope that we will roll Europe, but we will not touch them?
    1. +2
      22 February 2020 12: 15
      It has been said many times that we will hit at decision centers and headquarters ...
    2. +1
      23 February 2020 13: 33
      this is not naivety, but an awn. What is the use of the Arabs in geyropa to us? (it will bring a lot of radionuclides to us) But the best thing about the meager state. And save your nature and so that your head does not stagger. Long live the Canadian-Mexican Canal! laughing
      1. 0
        24 February 2020 18: 41
        Long live the Canadian-Mexican Canal! Channel them. Stalin
  9. 0
    22 February 2020 10: 14
    Yet it is written - a sheet, a compass, towards the cemetery ...
    1. 0
      22 February 2020 15: 14
      Quote: arhitroll
      Yet it is written - a sheet, a compass, towards the cemetery ...

      Yes, nothing can be done. Just stand at attention at the construction site and sing the anthem of America. This time will be enough for the arrival of missiles. But it is so romantic - to disintegrate into small molecules at the moment of performing "God Save America"
  10. +2
    22 February 2020 10: 18
    Quote: Paul Siebert
    The actions of the Americans in the event of a nuclear strike of the Russian Federation from two points:
    1. Wrap yourself in a white sheet.
    2. Move towards the cemetery.

    ahead of ...
  11. +2
    22 February 2020 10: 33
    And ours in the "Scribe" exercises will work out strikes on the USA and Europe, in the event of US interference in the affairs of other countries?
  12. 0
    22 February 2020 11: 26
    They inflate on the Russian Federation, but Turkey really, by its actions poses a threat. and not RF current.
  13. 0
    22 February 2020 11: 29
    In the USA, they are working out the actions in case of a Russian nuclear strike on Europe
    bought a huge amount of sheets and put traffic signs in the cemetery?
  14. +4
    22 February 2020 11: 55
    That's what the damned Americans are up to! Rehearse the core of the war! Therefore, one must watch and ...
  15. -1
    22 February 2020 12: 07
    "in Eastern Europe, political elites and many ordinary citizens just welcome the deployment of American missiles", - and this is against the backdrop of statements by Pentagon representatives about the conduct of a local nuclear conflict within Eastern Europe (excluding the territory of the Russian Federation and including the territories of Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova).

    "... ....", S. Lavrov (C)
    1. 0
      23 February 2020 00: 46
      70% of the world's population cannot clearly explain why they wake up in the morning; and therefore to understand that they can kill in a war, it is also very difficult for them. And if you answer the cries of the marginal in their language - you are of the same blood with them :)
  16. +2
    22 February 2020 12: 12
    It should be understood that even if the Pentagon announces that it will not deploy new nuclear weapons in Europe, such statements should not be believed.


    Believe them, do not respect yourself ...
  17. 0
    22 February 2020 12: 27
    What a silly work-out to save Europe, they can be saved! The first attacks will be in America and immediately in other NATO countries. And after what cannot be avoided. But America will definitely not be in Europe!
  18. 0
    22 February 2020 12: 38
    And the response to the response was a blow to the United States - is that they thought or they think Europe will only hit Russians
  19. +1
    22 February 2020 14: 01
    In the USA, they are working out the actions in case of a Russian nuclear strike on Europe

    Notice, gentlemen of the Geyropeans. Not by Pin to these, but by geyrop !!!
    That is, they will make every effort to provoke this scenario of the Apocalypse.
    Of course, they will also get it, but your "ally" prefers that the retaliatory strike of Russia, since it is not going to attack itself, should fall on you.
    As the Russian folk wisdom says: "With this, allies and enemies are not necessary!" fellow lol
  20. 0
    22 February 2020 15: 21
    The US will be hit first. But this is "in theory". In practice, the United States is practicing the first strike scenario and assessing the possible reaction and consequences. That is why they are developing low-yield warheads. The answer to this "strategy" is testing ultra-high-yield warheads.
    1. +1
      23 February 2020 00: 40
      200 Megatons? :) You can immediately smell 600 in the Siberian caldera, which is already there. And further enjoy the view of the asteroid belt in orbit of the once former planet earth.
      You and the author would be united in one circle of blessed ones.
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. 0
    22 February 2020 18: 52
    Much honor! In my opinion, it is much clearer: "... the blow will be dealt to the center of decision making ...". An unrealizable striped dream - to sit out behind a puddle while Eurasia burns in a nuclear flame ...
    Do not wait! (with)
  23. -1
    22 February 2020 20: 01
    Only one plan can be implemented - a preliminary evacuation plan.
  24. 0
    23 February 2020 00: 27
    The world is reliably protected, as long as there are such exercises on both sides, no one will use a nuclear bomb. Everyone wants to live. Apocalypse will not happen. Well, perhaps ... by accident.
  25. +1
    23 February 2020 00: 30
    delirium ... The author is sick on the head; Ilya, stop this senseless business, and go in for embroidery, and you will bring benefits and people will stop thinking badly about you.
    The blow is made at decision centers, for decapitation; and not on operational clusters ...
  26. 0
    24 February 2020 20: 09
    We need to work out actions in the event of a nuclear strike against the United States, and they are all fighting overseas ...
  27. -1
    27 February 2020 20: 30
    this is the deepest mistake of the Russian military strategy - to strike at American bases in Europe. Asia and the like should be struck exclusively and exclusively on the territory of the United States !!! Only then will there be any sense.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"