In the USA, they are working out the actions in case of a Russian nuclear strike on Europe


The possibility of a Russian nuclear strike on US bases in Europe is very scary for both America’s European allies and Washington itself. The other day, the United States conducted exercises to test the response in the event of a nuclear strike.


The Pentagon representative spoke about small military exercises conducted at a training ground in Nebraska. According to the scenario of the exercises, Russia attacked short-range missiles with military facilities of the North Atlantic Alliance in Europe. The decision on retaliatory actions in such a situation is made by the president and the US Secretary of Defense. According to the plan of the exercises, the response was a nuclear strike on Russian territory.

For the United States and its European NATO allies, the topic of Russia's nuclear attack is very painful. It is no accident that short-range nuclear missiles were deployed on submarines of the United States Navy, as it recently became known. Moreover, the Pentagon did not hide the fact that this is being done to deter Russia, although it is not going to attack European countries or launch nuclear strikes against them.

At the same time, the USA does not plan to deploy additional nuclear weapons in Europe weapon low power. But in response to the termination of the INF Treaty, the United States intends to deploy ballistic and cruise missiles in several European countries. Naturally, the need for such a solution is explained by concern for the security of the US European allies. At the same time, it can be assumed that the United States will increase the number of weapons, military equipment and personnel directly at the eastern borders of the NATO bloc, that is, in Romania, Poland and the Baltic countries. It is these five states that now form the basis of the eastern flank of the North Atlantic Alliance.

Interestingly, unlike the countries of Western Europe, in Eastern Europe, political elites and many ordinary citizens welcome the deployment of American missiles. For example, in Poland Russophobia has reached such an extent that neither the government of the country, nor a significant part of the townsfolk want to hear about all the risks associated with the deployment of American missiles. The fact that their country could suffer very seriously in the event of a retaliatory strike is of little concern to anti-Russian chauvinists. It is much more important for them to rattle with arms, play a war and once again demonstrate to the world the famous "Polish pride". The Baltic countries adhere to approximately the same model of behavior, which, on the contrary, constantly ask the United States and NATO to increase their military presence on their territory.

In Germany, France, Italy, politicians have a more balanced and wise position. For example, many German politicians do not hide the fact that they would like the withdrawal of American troops from the territory of Germany. And they associate the risks of delivering missile attacks from Russia precisely with the presence of American military bases on the territory of the country.

Currently, American nuclear weapons are deployed at bases in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Turkey. But Ankara has recently not been considered a reliable ally by the American leadership. Therefore, nuclear weapons are gradually being removed from the Turkish Incirlik military base, moving it, most likely, to the Devesela military base in Romania, although of course no one officially declares this.

It should be understood that even if the Pentagon reports that it will not deploy new nuclear weapons in Europe, such statements should not be believed. The U.S. Department of Defense can safely, pretending that nothing is happening, secretly move missiles with nuclear warheads to their military bases. While such a scenario may still not pass with countries such as Germany or the Netherlands, because there is public opinion, there are politicians who are negatively inclined even to existing US military facilities, then in Eastern Europe everything is much simpler in this regard - and the authorities do not mind , and public opinion with the help of thoroughly anti-Russian media has long been prepared.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dmitry Potapov 22 February 2020 09: 18 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    When God wants to punish a person, he robs his mind! As for the retaliatory strike against Russia because of its bases in Europe, the maximum that the United States will do is by striking at our bases outside the Russian Federation.
    1. Ilya-spb 22 February 2020 09: 30 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And what do we do?
      1. Ros 56 22 February 2020 09: 41 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Clap your hands.
      2. Arberes 22 February 2020 13: 03 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Ilya-spb
        And what do we do?

        To develop the Navy and on an ongoing basis go near the coast of our potential enemy.
        Which - no, but there will be parity according to the flight time. hi
    2. Fedor egoist 22 February 2020 12: 16 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      the maximum that the United States will do is strike at our bases outside the Russian Federation

      Exchange> 200 of your bases in Europe for two Syrian and Armenian bases of the Russian Federation? Not even funny ...
      According to the plan of the exercises, the response was a nuclear strike on Russian territory

      But this is more likely. Another thing is that our blow to the United States will not be retaliatory, as in their wet dreams, but retaliatory-oncoming or even preventive.
      It is no accident that short-range nuclear missiles were deployed on submarines of the United States Navy, as it recently became known.

      Short-range ICBMs? Can it still have reduced power (the so-called "pops")?
      The U.S. Department of Defense can safely, pretending nothing is happening, secretly move missiles with nuclear warheads to its military bases

      What missiles are we talking about? In the USA, tactical nuclear weapons remained only in the form of free-falling B61. The rest is discarded long ago and disposed of.
      The author is requested not to write on topics about which he has the most superficial understanding.
      1. Arberes 22 February 2020 13: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Fedor Egoist
        Short-range ICBMs? Can it still have reduced power (the so-called "pops")?

        Most likely with reduced power. Short-range ICBMs are something new. The States announced a project of low-power charges on their boats. hi
  2. svp67 22 February 2020 09: 18 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    The Pentagon representative spoke about small military exercises conducted at a training ground in Nebraska.
    And he thought that they had "trained" in Iraq ... Have they already stopped the "count of the number of wounded" or not?
    1. Chaldon48 22 February 2020 09: 36 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      As far as I know, there were specially reserved places for mass graves in the event of a nuclear conflict.
      1. Pavel57 22 February 2020 10: 28 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Mass graves can be in the event of a natural disaster and a social explosion.
  3. Professor Preobrazhensky 22 February 2020 09: 31 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    In the USA, they are working out the actions in case of a Russian nuclear strike on Europe

    Wear gas masks and lie down in the direction of Europe?
    1. bessmertniy 22 February 2020 09: 39 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      Something they are increasingly hoping for Europe that it should be a blow. what But this may turn out to be a mistake, and then what is the use of these teachings. request
      1. Chervonny 22 February 2020 09: 56 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Perhaps the US military believes that a possible nuclear war will be limited and will not go beyond Europe. I see no other reason request
      2. Nyrobsky 22 February 2020 10: 01 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: bessmertniy
        Something they are increasingly hoping for Europe that it should be a blow. what But this may be a mistake, and then what is the use of these teachings. request

        In order to force Russia to launch a nuclear attack on Europe, it is necessary to try very hard, more specifically to mattresses. Well, if the mattresses achieve this, then most likely the blow will be inflicted not only on Europe, but also on the United States as the main provocateur and initiator of the conflict. It seems that they can’t work out safely outside the puddle.
        1. bessmertniy 22 February 2020 10: 12 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          They still think in the old fashioned way - that they will be able to somehow sit out over the oceans. And today, for us, the oceans are not a hindrance. hi
  4. Olya Tsako 22 February 2020 09: 39 New
    • 5
    • 19
    -14
    Lavrov Shoigu is calling after an appeal from President Fed. meeting and says: - Listen, Kozhugetovich, do not hit New York, I have a daughter there. Shoigu replies: “Yes, I know. Matvienko also called about the United States.” Mizulina asked not to hit Belgium, Zhirinovsky - to Switzerland, and Zheleznyak - to London. Our others called, the list is really big ... ... Pause. Listen, Lavrov, where to hit then, in which case? - Mmm, well, the character of Wuhan. And we will help the Chinese Communists. And save face.
    1. arhitroll 22 February 2020 10: 16 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      prapor shmalnet - if the reptilian buttons do not turn off ...
    2. tihonmarine 22 February 2020 11: 58 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Olya Tsako
      Mmm, well, Wuhan character.

      Well, you have bad jokes in Ukraine.
      1. akarfoxhound 22 February 2020 15: 23 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        This is a twisted bearded joke about Voronezh, in which there are no Kremlin relatives. He is already a meme about 7-8 years old
    3. Pacifist with AK 22 February 2020 18: 55 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Olya, Olya .... Crisis of the genre? Honestly, not funny .... From the word "in general" ...
  5. Ros 56 22 February 2020 09: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Fools, I would not want to, but in which case there will be two blows both in Europe and in the states at the same time, as in decision centers. Are they really so stupid that they cannot remember the words of GDP.
  6. Mountain shooter 22 February 2020 09: 55 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    And why do we need to deliver a nuclear strike on densely populated Europe. Without the United States there is no military force there and will not be in the near future. Beat so immediately across the United States. And Europe is simple, to the English Channel ... tongue
  7. Paul Siebert 22 February 2020 09: 56 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    The actions of the Americans in the event of a nuclear strike of the Russian Federation from two points:
    1. Wrap yourself in a white sheet.
    2. Move towards the cemetery.
  8. Grits 22 February 2020 10: 04 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    So weird these Americans. Or stupid, I can’t understand. It would be better to work out actions in the event of a strike against the United States. Because it will fly on them in the first place. In Europe, only threatening facilities can be destroyed, and even cities spared. Because, after nothing is left of America, Europe itself will die safely. Therefore - the bulk of the missiles - to the states!
    Naive elves hope that we will roll Europe, but we will not touch them?
    1. cniza 22 February 2020 12: 15 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      It has been said many times that we will hit at decision centers and headquarters ...
    2. cradle 23 February 2020 13: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      this is not naivety, but an awn. What is the use of the Arabs in geyropa to us? (it will bring a lot of radionuclides to us) But the best thing about the meager state. And save your nature and so that your head does not stagger. Long live the Canadian-Mexican Canal! laughing
      1. fraders 24 February 2020 18: 41 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Long live the Canadian-Mexican Canal! Channel them. Stalin
  9. arhitroll 22 February 2020 10: 14 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Yet it is written - a sheet, a compass, towards the cemetery ...
    1. Grits 22 February 2020 15: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: arhitroll
      Yet it is written - a sheet, a compass, towards the cemetery ...

      Yes, nothing can be done. Just stand at attention and sing the anthem of America. This time is enough for the arrival of missiles. But it’s so romantic - to break up into small molecules at the time of the performance of "God Save America"
  10. arhitroll 22 February 2020 10: 18 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Paul Siebert
    The actions of the Americans in the event of a nuclear strike of the Russian Federation from two points:
    1. Wrap yourself in a white sheet.
    2. Move towards the cemetery.

    ahead of ...
  11. 75 Sergey 22 February 2020 10: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And our “Scribe” exercises will work out attacks on the USA and Europe in the event of US interference in the affairs of other countries?
  12. Lamata 22 February 2020 11: 26 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    They inflate on the Russian Federation, but Turkey really, by its actions poses a threat. and not RF current.
  13. Barmaleyka 22 February 2020 11: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In the USA, they are working out the actions in case of a Russian nuclear strike on Europe
    bought a huge amount of sheets and put traffic signs in the cemetery?
  14. Nikolaevich I 22 February 2020 11: 55 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    That's what the damned Americans are up to! Rehearse the core of the war! Therefore, one must watch and ...
  15. Operator 22 February 2020 12: 07 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    "In Eastern Europe, political elites and many ordinary citizens welcome the deployment of American missiles", - and this is against the backdrop of statements by Pentagon representatives about the conduct of a local nuclear conflict within Eastern Europe (excluding the territory of the Russian Federation and including the territories of Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova).

    "... ....", S. Lavrov (C)
    1. Voltsky 23 February 2020 00: 46 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      70% of the world's population cannot clearly explain why they wake up in the morning; and therefore to understand that they can kill in a war, it is also very difficult for them. And if you answer the cries of the marginal in their language - you are of the same blood with them :)
  16. cniza 22 February 2020 12: 12 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    It should be understood that even if the Pentagon announces that it will not deploy new nuclear weapons in Europe, such statements should not be believed.


    Believe them, do not respect yourself ...
  17. Berg berg 22 February 2020 12: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What a silly work-out to save Europe, they can be saved! The first attacks will be in America and immediately in other NATO countries. And after what cannot be avoided. But America will definitely not be in Europe!
  18. Charik 22 February 2020 12: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And the response to the response was a blow to the United States - is that they thought or they think Europe will only hit Russians
  19. K-50 22 February 2020 14: 01 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    In the USA, they are working out the actions in case of a Russian nuclear strike on Europe

    Notice, gentlemen of the Geyropeans. Not by Pin to these, but by geyrop !!!
    That is, they will make every effort to provoke this scenario of the Apocalypse.
    They, of course, will also get it, but your “ally” prefers that Russia’s retaliatory strike, since she’s not going to attack herself, is for you.
    As the Russian folk wisdom says: “with such allies and enemies it is not necessary!” fellow lol
  20. iouris 22 February 2020 15: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The United States will be hit first. But this is “in theory”. In practice, the USA is working out the scenario of the first strike and evaluating the possible reaction and consequences. That is why they are developing low power warheads. The answer to this “strategy” is to test extra-large warheads.
    1. Voltsky 23 February 2020 00: 40 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      200 Megatons? :) You can immediately smell 600 in the Siberian caldera, which is already there. And further enjoy the view of the asteroid belt in orbit of the once former planet earth.
      You and the author would be united in one circle of blessed ones.
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. Pacifist with AK 22 February 2020 18: 52 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    A lot of honor! In my opinion, it’s much clearer: "... the blow will be dealt to the center of decision-making ...". A pipe dream is impossible - to sit behind a puddle while Eurasia burns in a nuclear flame ...
    Do not wait! (with)
  23. Sergey985 22 February 2020 20: 01 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Only one plan can be implemented - a preliminary evacuation plan.
  24. However, dear 23 February 2020 00: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The world is reliably protected, as long as there are such exercises on both sides, no one will use a nuclear bomb. Everyone wants to live. Apocalypse will not happen. Well, perhaps ... by accident.
  25. Voltsky 23 February 2020 00: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    delirium ... The author is sick on the head; Ilya, stop this senseless business, and go in for embroidery, and you will bring benefits and people will stop thinking badly about you.
    The blow is made at decision centers, for decapitation; and not on operational clusters ...
  26. Oyo Sarkazmi 24 February 2020 20: 09 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    We need to work out actions in the event of a nuclear strike against the United States, and they are all fighting overseas ...
  27. Looking for 27 February 2020 20: 30 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    this is the deepest mistake of the Russian military strategy - to strike at American bases in Europe. Asia and the like should be struck exclusively and exclusively on the territory of the United States !!! Only then will there be any sense.