Vikramaditya. Modernization in pictures

38
Light aircraft carrier "Vikramaditya" (Sk.) Is intended to replace the aircraft carrier "Vikrant" that has exhausted its service life. This ship after completion should be the flagship of the Indian Navy. This aircraft carrier was built on the basis of the heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Gorshkov through deep modernization. Currently, the ship after a complete overhaul is introduced into the Indian Navy. 8 June 2012 of the year was removed from the waters of the Northern machine-building enterprise for sea trials in the White and then in the Barents Sea. Approximate dates for testing - until December 2012

Vikramaditya. Modernization in pictures


The aircraft carrier was built on the basis of the heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Gorshkov through deep modernization.
After a complete reconstruction, the ship changed its purpose: instead of an anti-aircraft anti-aircraft cruiser, the ship became a full-fledged light aircraft carrier.
In the process of rebuilding the ship's hull, most of the elements above the waterline were replaced, the boilers of the power plant were replaced, all the weapons were removed and a new, exclusively anti-aircraft system was installed. Rebuilding has also undergone a hangar. On the deck of the ship, there is a three-wire aero-finisher, a springboard and an optical landing system, two lifts. Aircraft of up to 25 tons weight can take on an aircraft carrier, among them MiG-29K, C-54 / 55 / 56, Rafale-M, F / A-18. Also, the Ka-28 and Ka-31 helicopters will be present on the aircraft carrier, and the HAL Dhruv and Russian Ka-60 (Ka-64) Kasatka helicopters will be based.
As of August 2009, 45 Indian specialists were involved in aircraft carrier modernization at Sevmash.



In February, the CEO of Nikolay Kalistratov and a group of Sevmash specialists visited the Black Sea Shipyard in Nikolaev in February 2010. According to the results of negotiations at Sevmash, three employees of the Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant, including the chief builder of the aircraft under reconstruction, Evgeny M. Intis, were invited to transfer experience.
In June, the 2010 of the year arrived on the aircraft carrier mock-up of a MiG-29K fighter with a 12 mass. The model was designed for interdepartmental tests on the deck of a ship. In particular, to check the restraint used at the start of the aircraft.
The transfer ship to the Indian Navy is scheduled for December 4 2012. In September, 2011 first outing was moved from November 2011 to the end of May 2012.
8 June 2012, the aircraft carrier Vikramaditya first set sail for full-scale tests.
During the first stage of factory trials in the White Sea, a number of measurements of the physical fields of the ship were carried out, the training of the aircraft carrier crew on fueling and fresh water was completed.

Since mid-July 2012, the second phase of the tests of the aircraft carrier of the Indian Navy "Vikramaditya" has been held.
In the tests of an aircraft carrier, marine units are also involved. aviation SF: crews of airplanes and helicopters make planned overflights of Vikramaditya in order to check the ship’s radar systems, air defense systems, communications and aviation control systems.















































































































































38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. DeamonFIre
    +11
    24 July 2012 07: 33
    Beauties !!!
    1. collapse
      +7
      24 July 2012 07: 52
      Yes, this would not hurt us.
      For each fleet, one such one, already the combat potential will increase, and preferably 2
      We will hope for common sense of our leadership, and even if common sense wins, then for uninterrupted financing.
  2. Vanek
    +7
    24 July 2012 07: 59
    Could once. Right now that stops request
    1. Tirpitz
      +13
      24 July 2012 10: 10
      Stops the lack of desire and motivation of the country's leadership. 3 nuclear cruisers rot, where is the upgrade? So far, only plans and conversations (they are modernizing, then they are not, but time is running out). Indians constantly pressed at the highest level, so I had to fulfill the order. Let's see what will be made of Kuznetsov and in what time frame.
    2. +3
      24 July 2012 18: 17
      Yes, the volume of work on the ship carried out by Sevmash workers is beyond praise, I think why a little long because they carried out such work for the first time
      1. Hysnik-Tsuzoy
        0
        24 July 2012 21: 37
        In the pictures, I noticed how the surrounding surroundings are changing for the better, in the sense of factory buildings, as the boat was modernized, they became more and more decent. Maybe this is the reason for the delay in fulfilling obligations - at first the plant was modernized, and then the ship, which is generally correct.
  3. +6
    24 July 2012 08: 16
    My heart bleeds .... how does this handsome man need Pacific Fleet ..
  4. Nizamov
    +3
    24 July 2012 08: 27
    Handsome man! How can one sell such?
    1. Tirpitz
      +13
      24 July 2012 10: 11
      Not a sold one, but a rusty bucket. And so he was made at the expense of India. In the Russian Federation, he would simply rot. The first photo shows in what condition it was sold.
  5. black_eagle
    +3
    24 July 2012 08: 27
    If he had a nuclear propulsion system, but steam or the latest electromagnetic catapults - there would be no price! And so taking off with the help of a personal power plant from a short platform greatly reduces the flight radius of the birds
    1. M. Peter
      0
      25 July 2012 21: 00
      You're wrong.
      1. black_eagle
        +1
        25 July 2012 23: 18
        Greetings! I’m not only mistaken, I’m fundamentally wrong! Putting a nuclear power plant on a ship with such a displacement is at least idiocy! It’s the same thing as to shove YaMZ-238 viburnum into Lada, this time! Installation of a catapult requires additional power to create pressure that will push a 25-35 tonne engine (MiG or Su), power take-off from a diesel engine is a decrease in the cruiser’s speed and additional fuel consumption, this ship is essentially a small aircraft carrier, with a displacement not even reaching Kuznetsov. so my previous post was just an enthusiastic joke, don’t be offended drinks
        1. M. Peter
          0
          26 July 2012 11: 28
          The MiG-29, which will land and take off from this ship, does not need any catapults. The thrust of the engines allows it to take off with full combat load from the springboard. But the catapult has its own considerable dimensions. All the same, "Vikramanditya" is not an American "Nimitz" where you can place a rather bulky mechanism inside. Plus the load on the reactor or put an additional power unit that will work purely on the catapult. And this is all a precious place.
          If you even had to put an additional rod for the placement of navigation equipment, then what catapults can be at all. The ship is not too big, the catapult is not an allowable luxury for him, with its size.
  6. 755962
    +6
    24 July 2012 08: 28
    Russia will build aircraft carriers, confirmed the commander of the Navy
    ST. PETERSBURG, June 25 - RIA Novosti. The new commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, Vice Admiral Viktor Chirkov, on Monday confirmed plans to create aircraft carrier groups.
    In February of this year, Chirkov's predecessor as commander-in-chief of the Navy, Vladimir Vysotsky, said in an interview with RIA Novosti that the technical design of a new aircraft carrier for the Navy would be developed before 2014, and the ship itself would be built after 2020. According to him, the new ship will not be an aircraft carrier in the classical sense of the word - it will "be one step ahead."
    http://www.ria.ru/defense_safety/20120625/681505098.html
    I really, really want to believe that it will be so .....
    1. +3
      24 July 2012 16: 14
      Quote: 755962
      the new ship will not be an aircraft carrier in the classical sense of the word - it will "be one step ahead"
      I read this article, it hinted at the possibility of using promising aircraft carriers for missile defense. In general, the idea seems to me to be very controversial. The aircraft carrier is designed for land / water strikes, not in near space. Previously, we also placed missiles on aircraft-carrying cruisers, but only anti-aircraft self-defense and anti-ship strike. "Granites" still cause controversy - needed / not needed. But you need to remember one thing, the more large missiles on an aircraft carrier, the fewer aircraft, which reduces its effectiveness as an aircraft carrier itself. It would be wiser to build destroyers and upgrade cruisers by installing universal launchers. For missile defense, this is more logical.
  7. +5
    24 July 2012 08: 29
    And it’s sad and insulting that we didn’t have the money to modernize the finished combat unit.
    1. +8
      24 July 2012 09: 33
      Of course there was no backup ... "after all, we are a poor country, completely without resources ..."

      You yourself believe what you say .... "there was no money" ....
  8. tut ya
    +4
    24 July 2012 09: 19
    And I liked the tricolor good, even in the service of India, but still ours
  9. +3
    24 July 2012 09: 32
    Beautiful car ... even for the Hindus, but they did the same ... well done good
  10. +6
    24 July 2012 09: 32
    It is interesting to compare it with the brother of Chinese modernization
  11. vov4ik
    +3
    24 July 2012 09: 44
    In the penultimate photo, what kind of ship is the aircraft carrier?
    1. Tirpitz
      +5
      24 July 2012 09: 55
      Nuclear cruiser of the "Orlan" project
    2. VAF
      VAF
      +14
      24 July 2012 10: 48
      Quote: vov4ik

      In the penultimate photo, what kind of ship is the aircraft carrier?


      The cruiser "Admiral Nakhimov", for the last ten years, changed, as it is on conservation on the "Sevmash".

      And again, all the promises to modernize, but that ends .... we talked. !!!

      [/ Center

      The ship of the same series "Admiral Ushakov" is at the shipyard in Severodvinsk "Zvezdochka", but it has been withdrawn from the fleet! am

      [Center]


      Currently, the Russian Navy has the only ship of this series, the cruiser Peter the Great (improved project 1144.3). crying

      1. +4
        24 July 2012 11: 31
        Sergei welcome! Thanks for the detailed info with the photo materials. Everything is as always at 5 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  12. +1
    24 July 2012 09: 57
    The drain of every nation and most importantly all stand and do nothing ...
  13. Born in USSR
    +4
    24 July 2012 11: 03
    I hope that the experience gained at Gorshkov will be useful in the construction of our own aircraft carriers.
  14. +3
    24 July 2012 11: 24
    Impressive, damn it! We can do something ....
    1. +5
      24 July 2012 12: 13
      We can ... only for some reason, everything is for someone ... but for your own army and navy shish ... After all, they could also remake Gorshkov for themselves, such ships will never be superfluous, in any fleet (well, except in Kazakh =)))
      1. +4
        24 July 2012 16: 02
        An aircraft carrier is a powerful thing, but it requires escort ships - destroyers of the oceanic zone with very decent air defense and anti-aircraft defense. We do not have such destroyers yet. Their construction is a prospect for the next 10 years. There are, of course, "Eagles" and "Atlanta" (range and combat characteristics are pretty good if you upgrade). But for effective cover, you need not one escort ship, but a warrant. And we have only 4 cruisers (operational). Therefore, first you need to launch into series the destroyers of cover and multipurpose nuclear submarines (not only "Ash", but something cheaper, closer to "Shchukam-B". Only after that it will be possible to effectively use the aircraft carriers. Although I agree, I would rather have ...
  15. NickitaDembelnulsa
    +4
    24 July 2012 12: 14
    This is the scale. Just Soviet Construction! They say correctly: any whim for your money!
  16. +5
    24 July 2012 12: 29
    Yes, handsome, of course. One must do something similar for himself. Let the prokhorov take and restore one of the canned admirals. You look and choose the president. winked
  17. +1
    24 July 2012 12: 32
    "You need such a cow yourself ..."
  18. Brother Sarych
    0
    24 July 2012 13: 09
    In my opinion, this should have been done for our own fleet, and not for some turkeys! And if you look, then the means for this could be found in the country - but you had to want ...
  19. 0
    24 July 2012 13: 14
    On the main photo AMX 13 off topic
  20. +1
    24 July 2012 13: 27
    It’s a pity that it’s not for oneself, it’s a pity that the Ketais sold almost ready-made aircraft carriers at the price of scrap metal. A lot of things are a pity, but it's all in the past, but we must look to the future. Let the Indians have Vikramaditya not the newest, but we will have aircraft-carrying platforms, modular-transformer plan capable of fighting on water, under water and in the air)))
    1. Tirpitz
      +2
      24 July 2012 13: 34
      Do not forget to clarify what will happen by 2000 - it is not known which year. Since no aircraft-carrying platforms, modular-transformer plan capable of fighting on water, under water and in the air have not been developed so far; there is no carrier-based AWACS aircraft, and even the construction of the first such platform will take 10 years.
      1. +1
        24 July 2012 17: 01
        But this does not mean that one should not strive for it, does not say that it is not necessary to develop the same DRLOU aviation, carefully consider the possibility of using drones for various purposes, and work out automated control systems. We must look forward to a breakthrough, and not look back.
  21. 0
    24 July 2012 14: 58
    Messrs. TARKs and TAKRs are a "submariner's dream", they are effective against an enemy with a previously suppressed anti-ship (ground, air and sea) system, my opinion is we need Yaseny submarines, look where the states use their "carriers", I think we have opponents there no, imagine a conflict with nato while you bring air carriers there, in a war, what is left of it. Now we are more important Only submarines, although the report is beautiful, note the parity of China and India with our TAKRs 1: 1, due to the contract we will build a couple of ash trees, there will be "adversaries" such as Iraqi Afgan, Libya then need their aircraft carriers, but for now let Kuzya keep personnel, training system and infrastructure
    1. 16
      16
      0
      5 August 2012 23: 29
      technology and operating time is still a pity !!!!!!!!!!!! especially for kickbacks and bribes !!!!!!!
  22. biglow
    -1
    24 July 2012 15: 04
    let's hope that Putin will be able to return the city of Nikolaev founded by the Russians back and then suitable shipyards and specialists will appear for the construction of aircraft carriers
  23. Vito
    +1
    24 July 2012 17: 59
    Thanks for the portfolio. It’s depressing that the photo shoot is no longer about OUR ship!
    THERE WAS WHEN TIME AND POWER WAS AND WILL!
  24. +2
    24 July 2012 18: 06
    What happened to "Admiral Gorshkov"
    People who are poorly versed in the problems of the fleet in general and in the problems of maintaining ships in particular, probably do not understand why one of the best aircraft carriers of the Russian fleet had such a short life - only 10 years from 25, allotted to it by the designers? What is the reason: in the shortcomings of domestic shipbuilding technology or in illiterate operation?
    According to Vladimir Chuvakin, Deputy General Director for Military Equipment of Sevmash, the reasons for the transience of life of aircraft carriers are in the conditions of their maintenance, in relation to these cruisers and to all ships in general:
    - None of them, except for the aircraft carrier “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov”, had its own specialized berth. The motor resources of the ships "knocked out" in the raid. Infrastructure for their maintenance and operation was not created, the full life cycle of the ship was not monitored.
    http://nvo.ng.ru/concepts/2007-08-10/4_power.html
  25. mishan
    +1
    25 July 2012 00: 40
    Nightmare! From what piece of piece of iron the candy was done, well done!
  26. 0
    25 July 2012 06: 21
    And who is Vikram? It says Vikram dita)))
    1. +1
      25 July 2012 14: 44
      Vikram is one of the most famous names of Indian history, King Ujayini in Western India
  27. werr17
    +1
    25 July 2012 18: 29
    I hope it was a "dress rehearsal" before the construction of an aircraft carrier for the Russian Navy!
  28. Pravdoruba
    0
    26 July 2012 20: 49
    this one is certainly good, but we need a newer project, taking into account all the accumulated knowledge
  29. 16
    16
    0
    5 August 2012 23: 28
    Of course, it’s shitty that this is not our aircraft carrier !!!!!!!!! as I would like ---- the Russian Navy upgraded and commissioned the aircraft carrier !!!!!!!!!!!