It is reported that Turkey allegedly did not let the aircraft of the Russian Air Force through its airspace into Syria

58

Middle Eastern media published material that relates to Turkish measures to curb the use of their airspace by airplanes of the Russian Aerospace Forces. In particular, it is alleged that Turkey allegedly closed its airspace for Russian aircraft, among which there were allegedly military ones. The same statements were published in Nezavisimaya Gazeta.

At the moment, there is no official evidence from the Russian defense department, and it cannot be. It is well known that the whole battle aviation The Russian Aerospace Forces, heading for Syria, flies through the Caspian Sea, Iran and Iraq, and never uses Turkish airspace for this. Only Turkey’s military transport aircraft, as well as civilian aircraft, fly through Turkey.



In this regard, such publications on Middle Eastern resources look like a throw-in for studying the reaction.

In addition, it is stated that the Turkish Air Force F-16 fighter several hours ago entered the airspace of the SAR in the province of Aleppo, deepening several kilometers. But, according to reports, there he was "met" by the Russian Su-35 fighter, after which the Turkish plane returned to Turkish airspace. Similar messages about the “meeting of the Su-35 of the Russian Air Force and the F-16 of the Turkish Air Force” came several days ago.

Recall that on the eve of the militants of various groups tried to break through the front of the SAA in the Nairab area, however, Russian bombers extinguished the ardor of the terrorists, inflicting damage on them in manpower and equipment.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    58 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +29
      21 February 2020 14: 19
      almost all fighter-bomber aviation flies through Iran and Iraq.
      Prior to the sharp warming of relations with Turkey in 2016, the ban affected all military aircraft, including transporters. so it was in the days of the Union.
      1. +16
        21 February 2020 14: 24
        I guess crap.
        Airplanes do not need to enter Turkish space.
        Iraq will miss anyone now.
        Iran will not repair obstacles for our planes.
        Turkey will not refuse to do anything disgusting to us, but only if it makes a profit from it or at least the result.
        Crap!
        1. KCA
          +4
          21 February 2020 15: 14
          If Iran allowed the basing of TU-23M3 at its airfield, there would be no exact obstruction with a transit span
        2. 0
          21 February 2020 15: 15
          Quote: Shurik70
          I guess crap.

          Recently, transport aviation and VKS passenger aircraft flew through the territory of Turkey, so just closer.
        3. +1
          21 February 2020 16: 12
          Quote: Shurik70
          I guess crap.
          Airplanes do not need to enter Turkish space.

          Russia flew to Syria through Turkey. This is a shorter route than through Iran and Iraq.
          1. +2
            22 February 2020 03: 27
            Such routes are agreed at the government level. If the Turks really didn’t miss our planes, then this is a sharp cooling in relations. And our S-400 and they will pay for it still oh how long. They can and think
        4. +3
          21 February 2020 17: 10
          Quote: Shurik70
          Airplanes do not need to enter Turkish space.

          Yes, they never went there. From the inadequate Edik (now already associated with Adik ibn Aloizych), one can expect everything.
        5. 0
          21 February 2020 20: 16
          Quote: Shurik70
          crap.
          Airplanes do not need to enter Turkish space.
          Iraq will miss anyone now

          You do not know that the civilian side and aircraft of the BTA of the Russian Federation flew through Turkey? Why? Trite - closer than making a detour through Iran or Iraq. And Erdogash for Moscow was then almost a friend
      2. -2
        21 February 2020 18: 07
        But I have never heard of the airspace of one country within the airspace of another.
    2. +2
      21 February 2020 14: 25
      still reportedly allegedly closing the Bosphorus, can we smoked Th?
      1. +4
        21 February 2020 17: 12
        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
        still reportedly allegedly closing the Bosphorus, can we smoked Th?

        By whom is it reported? Couch "blowers", "anonymous sources close to God himself, who wished to remain anonymous," or you personally? They said - "A", say "B".
      2. +4
        21 February 2020 20: 21
        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
        the alleged closure of the Bosphorus is also reported

        this is unlikely. The Bosphorus and the Dardanelles will be closed only if a real war breaks out. Which, by and large, is not needed either by Turkey or Russia. Of course, they will do dirty tricks, but most likely they will not get into the open.

        The Straits is not the airspace of Turkey. The procedure for using the straits is laid down in international legal documents, and to provide the airspace of one’s country or not to another state is everyone’s private affair
    3. +8
      21 February 2020 14: 28


      Turkish quarter.
    4. +3
      21 February 2020 14: 28
      It is worth noting that today the Russian military also uses the airspace of Iran and Iraq, however, given the strong US pressure on Baghdad, the latter route can also be stopped.
      1. +5
        21 February 2020 15: 04
        Given all aspects of the pressure on Baghdad, the latter can only send everyone away with muddy desires. It is foolish to stop the transfer of transport aircraft through their territory, even Ukrainians relying entirely on the United States do not want to cut gas transit, and Iraq is not Ukraine, they do not favor Americans in Baghdad. But in general, even if the transfer to Syria is via water via Gibraltar, this will not affect the operational readiness of Russian bases.
    5. +10
      21 February 2020 14: 36
      ..............
      1. +10
        21 February 2020 14: 47
        Namely, in the Middle East media they did not even bother to look at the globe before printing such articles.
    6. +8
      21 February 2020 14: 43
      Too much OBS level news ... media agents frolic in full.
      1. +1
        21 February 2020 15: 26
        And everyone swears the "true truth" Yes
        Free News remains one of the few news sites to work independently and honestly.
        Turkey closed airspace for Russia
        Oleg Soloviev February 18 2020
        1. +3
          21 February 2020 18: 03
          Pledge type -A century of will not to be seen! - the most reliable of them
    7. +8
      21 February 2020 14: 49
      Quote: Andrey Koptelov


      Turkish quarter.

      crap somehow, Zelensky comedian is the same as the president
      1. +5
        21 February 2020 15: 26
        Is it really funny?
    8. -5
      21 February 2020 15: 05
      The Russian Federation is not yet ready for "Gunboat Diplomacy".
      1. +1
        21 February 2020 16: 03
        Quote: knn54
        The Russian Federation is not yet ready for "Gunboat Diplomacy".

        Yeah, the gunboats haven't built yet ...
    9. +14
      21 February 2020 15: 06
      Why on VO post articles with provocative and untested rumors?
    10. +15
      21 February 2020 15: 20
      Admini and why did not they write to whom it would be advantageous for Russia to fight the Turks? There are several candidates, NATO, ISRAEL, SA, and who gives the Sultan confidence that he can? SIGNIFICANTLY THE TURKS ARE NOT FAVORABLE TO FIGHT WITH RUSSIA, AND NOT FOR STRENGTH !!! But still, is the Sultan coming ???
      The choice of news is strange, and sometimes more like propaganda of the enemy than info? Where are the analyzes of Turkey’s steps in Syria and who draws Turk to such behavior?
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +3
            21 February 2020 16: 21
            lol well done!
            the war between Russia and Turkey is beneficial primarily to the United States, and to Israel. but Israel does not have the opportunity even to participate in this conflict. The Americans are sleeping and seeing how Russians and Turks are mating in Syria, so the Turks will be more accommodating for them, then make Russia as difficult as possible, make a second Afghanistan. for scavengers any conflict is beneficial.
            Why is Erdogan going to ekalatsia, although the war is not beneficial to him? a difficult question, for an answer you probably need to know the backstage of politics. to have a ghetto in Syria against the Kurds, personal ambitions, advisers oriented to the USA, although he is a sultan, he does not govern alone. the desire to sit on two chairs, playing on contradictions, to benefit from both Russia and the United States.
          2. +1
            21 February 2020 19: 33
            Quote: Wolf
            Does Sergei have any connection with the Jesuit Masonic Mova with my post?

            Don’t be offended, friend. But it feels like you're in a time machine from the 12th century.
        2. +15
          21 February 2020 15: 44
          75Sergey (Sergey)
          A man tries to write in Russian, although for the Wolf it is not his native language. What does not suit you.
          Or the main thing for you is to just ruin the air and dump it.
      2. LMN
        +3
        21 February 2020 15: 27
        Quote: Wolf
        Admini and why did not they write to whom it would be advantageous for Russia to fight the Turks? There are several candidates, NATO, ISRAEL, SA, and who gives the Sultan confidence that he can? SIGNIFICANTLY THE TURKS ARE NOT FAVORABLE TO FIGHT WITH RUSSIA, AND NOT FOR STRENGTH !!! But still, is the Sultan coming ???
        The choice of news is strange, and sometimes more like propaganda of the enemy than info? Where are the analyzes of Turkey’s steps in Syria and who draws Turk to such behavior?

        Good question.
        NATO supported (morally) Turkey ..
        1. +5
          21 February 2020 15: 29
          Yes, but who is behind ??? wink
          1. LMN
            +3
            21 February 2020 15: 36
            Quote: Wolf
            Yes, but who is behind ??? wink

            Yes, it’s clear who. lol
            Not everyone is ready to admit it. request
      3. 0
        21 February 2020 22: 22
        Quote: Wolf
        who pulls Turk to this behavior

        Erdogan’s great desire to bite off a piece of Syria, in all likelihood he does not understand that this time has already passed. And the United States only pushes Turkey to confront with Russia, it is very beneficial for them, in all aspects.
    11. 0
      21 February 2020 15: 22
      Quote: Wolf
      Admini and why did not they write to whom it would be advantageous for Russia to fight the Turks? There are several candidates, NATO, ISRAEL, SA, and who gives the Sultan confidence that he can? SIGNIFICANTLY THE TURKS ARE NOT FAVORABLE TO FIGHT WITH RUSSIA, AND NOT FOR STRENGTH !!! But still, is the Sultan coming ???
      The choice of news is strange, and sometimes more like propaganda of the enemy than info? Where are the analyzes of Turkey’s steps in Syria and who draws Turk to such behavior?

      Yes, I agree favorably with us and the Saudis. We kind of popcorn stocked up ...
      As for NATO, I don’t think there is any interest.
      1. +1
        21 February 2020 15: 30
        Shah, but somehow you are not with the United States?
      2. 0
        21 February 2020 22: 23
        Quote: Shahno
        us and the saudis. We kind of popcorn stocked up ...

        The Saudis themselves will soon be allowed to popcorn, barefoot Yemeni guys. laughing
    12. -3
      21 February 2020 15: 22
      It was necessary to cut off the barmaley from the border with Turkey, now it will be difficult to buy them from there, as well as the amers.
    13. 0
      21 February 2020 15: 35
      Or check Turkey for "lice"?
    14. -1
      21 February 2020 15: 35
      Quote: Wolf
      Shah, but somehow you are not with the United States?

      If you are about the IDF, we are with Israel ..
      1. +1
        21 February 2020 16: 58
        Are you sure that the IDF shares with the Israeli people are those. in his favor?
    15. +3
      21 February 2020 15: 38
      Oh, if many commentators here, at one time did not shout "Perestroika, Progress, Glasnost" and would not rush with tricolors and portraits of Yeltsin ...
      It is clear that history does not have a subjunctive mood, but how one wants to dream.
      Four heavy aircraft-carrying cruisers with full warrants approached the Bosphorus from Sevastopol and Odessa. At the same time, the 5th Mediterranean Squadron of Navy ships was put on full alert. The military alert raised the forces of the Warsaw Pact countries.
      The President of Turkey today will hold an emergency meeting with our Secretary General in Berlin. Also, to participate in resolving the situation in Syria, representatives of the countries of the Middle East and Western Europe will arrive in the GDR.
    16. -1
      21 February 2020 15: 45
      Quote: AVA77
      75Sergey (Sergey)
      A man tries to write in Russian, although for the Wolf it is not his native language. What does not suit you.
      Or the main thing for you is to just ruin the air and dump it.

      Well done, that he is trying to communicate, I respect.
      Ps. Well, you understand, if I start to speak Hebrew, Arabic, Spanish, English. Well this is not the language of the mother. Will we laugh? There will be an emphasis, mental inhibition.
      1. +5
        21 February 2020 16: 54
        This is not a correct arrangement, CORENE OF RUSSIAN AND SERBIAN AND POLISH AND SLOVAK AND CZECH AND UKRAINIAN AND BELARUSIAN AND RUSSIAN AND VENDA AND SORBIAN AND PRUSIAN ONE.
        Koren Angliyskogo, the art of language was created in the 16th century, and Hebrew does not have much connection. Arapsky and Hebrew can be connected.
        1. 0
          21 February 2020 20: 56
          Quote: Wolf
          Of the Prussian

          Prussians are not Slavs, but Baltic.
          And what did the Bulgarian miss?
          1. +1
            21 February 2020 23: 55
            Cyril of Bulgaria just scored add, but the Prussians Slavs at the expense of the Baltics who are they? look DNA tzv. Baltov and maybe you will appear consciousness, as well as DNA tvz. Swedes? wink smile smile
            1. 0
              22 February 2020 11: 41
              Quote: Wolf
              to the account of the Baltics who are they?

              https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%82%D1%8B
              1. 0
                22 February 2020 13: 56
                Cyril looked at these maps on the wiki and when he saw the Slavs resettlement in the 8th century, he stopped looking. So, according to HISTORY, there is a WESTERN GROUP OF SLAVES, EASTERN AND SOUTHERN. But the NORTHERN SLAVES ARE NOT HERE, because the Slavs did not go north. Or they were afraid of frost, etc. ... Actually, EST AND NORTHERN SLAVES. They were on the territory of the SWEDISH AND EAST BALTIC SEA AND TO THE SOUTH AS WESTERN SLAVES AND EASTERN !!! PEOPLE'S CIVILIZATION IS EXPANDING AT CONCENTRIC CIRCLES AND THE CENTER FOR CIVILIZATION OF SLAVES BEATED THE DANUBE RIVER WHERE THAT IS 7000-8000 YEARS BACK THERE. MEANS ONE TODAY GERMANY BEFORE THE BLACK SEA THE ORIGIN OF THE PEOPLE OF SLAVES WAS. APPROXIMATELY AS A BUMBLE THALAS HIT THEY EXPANDED TO THE WEST, EAST NORTH AND SOUTH! THE FIRST LETTER OF THE WHITE PERSON IS VYNCHANSKOE LETTER OF THE SLAVS OF SA DUNAYA OD OF THIS LETTER GOING NOW THE REMAIN LETTER OF THE WHITE MAN ITD .... YOU CAN RIGHTLY SAY THAT Civilization Grew Up. IT IS THAT THERE WERE A TIGAR AND EUFRAT FOR MESOPOTOMIA, AND A NEAL FOR EGYPT WAS A DANUBE FOR EUROPE, ONLY THE CIVILIZATION OF SLAVES ARE OLDER ABOUT THEIR APPROXIMATELY 2000- 3000 YEARS! So according to the CHRONICLES! :) According to history, 3 life of the world itself can exist, according to the annals of them 4! :)
                1. 0
                  22 February 2020 14: 26
                  In addition, the RUNISH LENGTH IS COMING FROM THE DANUBE - ABOVE !!! The funniest thing is when you see that they paint RUNE on tanks in NATO and RUNE they got od Slavs, they don’t even know how to read RUNE correctly! wink
                2. 0
                  22 February 2020 17: 01
                  Quote: Wolf
                  But the NORTHERN SLAVES ARE NOT HERE, because the Slavs did not go north

                  An article about the Balts, where does the Slavs have to do with it?
                  1. 0
                    22 February 2020 20: 06
                    And what do you think Balti really is?
    17. 0
      21 February 2020 16: 08
      stated that the Turkish Air Force F-16 fighter several hours ago entered the airspace of the SAR in the province of Aleppo, deepening several kilometers.
      Ummm ... did he fly for a couple of seconds or what? laughing
    18. -3
      21 February 2020 16: 08
      Quote: Professor Preobrazhensky
      Oh, if many commentators here, at one time did not shout "Perestroika, Progress, Glasnost" and would not rush with tricolors and portraits of Yeltsin ...
      There simply would not be such questions, especially with the Turks.

      You are mistaken and unfairly reproaching many locals, saying that they ran with portraits of EBN under Vlasov flags. Even superficially running through the posts, one could guess that grandfathers were running, and how to read that and some great-grandfathers.
      So they are not to blame, in vain you are so ...
    19. +4
      21 February 2020 17: 25
      So the Brothers that Napoleon would know as Hitler were performers, contractors behind their backs and one and the other were CUSTOMERS. Russia in 1814, when it conquered Paris, had customers under its paws, but Russia did not know who the enemy was. Today I think he knows by name, middle name and last name, and so it will act!
    20. -3
      21 February 2020 18: 35
      Quote: Piramidon
      Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
      still reportedly allegedly closing the Bosphorus, can we smoked Th?

      By whom is it reported? Couch "blowers", "anonymous sources close to God himself, who wished to remain anonymous," or you personally? They said - "A", say "B".

      hammer the word "Bosphorus" into Google and read it for pleasure, what problems do I have?
      1. -1
        22 February 2020 15: 25
        Scored, nothing like that, you're lying.
    21. -1
      22 February 2020 16: 01
      Quote: pogis
      Scored, nothing like that, you're lying.
      http://www.ng.ru/politics/2020-02-20/1_7800_bosphorus.html
      https://www.rusdialog.ru/war/195174_1582216464
      https://www.dialog.ua/world/201732_1582275169
      https://meduza.io/feature/2020/02/20/vot-teper-rossiya-i-turtsiya-realno-na-grani-voyny-v-sirii-kazhetsya-na-etot-raz-putin-proschital-ne-vse
      https://topcor.ru/13265-vks-rf-sorvali-blickrig-jerdogana-chto-dalshe.html
      scored, found, you're lying
      1. 0
        22 February 2020 22: 19
        Followed your links, you're lying.
    22. 0
      23 February 2020 06: 12
      Quote: pogis
      Followed your links, you're lying.

      Well you did not find there?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"