In China, named the parameter by which the modernized fighter J-20 surpassed the F-35

33
In China, named the parameter by which the modernized fighter J-20 surpassed the F-35

The Chinese media report a phased modernization of the 5th generation fighter J-20, calling the parameter by which the aircraft surpassed the F-35. This modernization is being carried out in China almost simultaneously with the deployment of these aircraft to the Air Force.

In particular, it is indicated that, in comparison with the first J-20 models, their upgraded versions can carry almost two more weapons. Attention is drawn to the fighter with tail number 2013. It is noted that this option J-20 can see several additional missile suspension points, which were not on previous versions.



Chinese experts argue that the new versions of the J-20 "surpassed the American F-35" precisely in terms of how many weapons (primarily missiles) the aircraft can take on board.

The comparison is as follows:

If the American F-35 can simultaneously carry up to 16 medium-range missiles, then the J-20 has 12 missiles in the main set and plus 6 in the additional one.

However, not all Chinese experts are delighted with this kind of information. So, it is noted that missiles on external suspensions reduce the level of stealth of a combat aircraft. Therefore, you have to look for a "middle ground", equipping the aircraft with the amount of weapons that is necessary for a specific operation.
  • CCTV 1
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. -6
    21 February 2020 12: 43
    Let Trump get nervous, as the Chinese fighters begin to surpass the American. feel I think that the Chinese will find a balance of such characteristics that will consolidate this superiority. hi
    1. +2
      21 February 2020 12: 47
      Chinese experts argue that the new versions of the J-20 "surpassed the American F-35" precisely in terms of how many weapons (primarily missiles) the aircraft can take on board.
      So, it is noted that missiles on external suspensions reduce the level of stealth of a combat aircraft.

      This is not an advantage, but a PR! One to the detriment of the other. Not that - not this. The truth is in the middle ground, but on this advantage of the J-20 will come to naught.
  3. +16
    21 February 2020 12: 45
    It seems to me that he surpassed him in wretchedness, F35 is personally prettier to me than this Frankenstein, in which a little from each wunderwaffle is collected, ugly letable, but I certainly do not pretend to the truth in the last instance. So expressed his opinion
  4. 0
    21 February 2020 13: 03
    According to one Chinese engineer (a graduate of our Polytechnic), they managed to develop a stealth coating that is more resistant to the environment than the Yankees .. and the rest is a moot point.
  5. +2
    21 February 2020 13: 08
    The Chinese media report ...
    So this is Sohu! J-20 in "beast mode" laughing
    https://www.sohu.com/a/371388634_448414
  6. +1
    21 February 2020 13: 18
    By the number of technologies stolen in the USSR.
  7. +3
    21 February 2020 13: 21
    The more suspension points, the more invisibility turns into a visible, so the Chinese have a strange advantage
  8. 0
    21 February 2020 13: 24
    Rockets on external sling do not "reduce stealth", but "disable" it. The speed and maneuvering qualities of an airplane hung to the eyeballs deteriorate significantly. It's time to estimate, but will it come out with good supersonic sound when fully loaded? I will add that the Penguin is smaller and with 1 engine. Compare their PN, too, as it is not comme il faut.
  9. 0
    21 February 2020 13: 44
    The Chinese can surprise the world only in one case - when they copy the VTOL F-35
    So far no surprise (!)
  10. +1
    21 February 2020 14: 09
    Tired .. until in a real battle there are 5th generation aircraft and, preferably not one on one, but as part of a squadron, for example, from whom it’s thicker we won’t find out
  11. +1
    21 February 2020 14: 29
    The Chinese media report on the phased modernization of the 5th generation fighter J-20

    There’s a kind of iPhone! They didn’t have time to release it, but they are already modernizing it.
  12. 0
    21 February 2020 14: 33
    Well, nobody forbids them to speak.
    Aivot who will be the first to discover the target - that and slippers!
  13. +2
    21 February 2020 14: 49
    The Russian Krasukha electronic warfare system burned down two of the most expensive American fighters. According to reports published by the American military, Russian electronic warfare systems deployed in Syria have caused serious damage to two of the most expensive American fighters, the F-35 and F-22. The systems of the latter came under powerful electronic influence and, most likely, became completely unusable, since they could not accurately determine the location in the airspace over Syria. According to the American analytical publication The National Interest, this happened during the repulsion of another massive drone raid on Khmeimim. The pilots managed with great difficulty to return the "extremely poorly obedient control" cars home. The most unpleasant thing for American experts was that both aircraft belong to the class of the most technologically advanced weapons, and they were destroyed by the Krasukha 1 electronic warfare station 257RL4.
    1. -1
      22 February 2020 04: 28
      Since when did the phrase
      “According to reports published by the US military, Russian electronic warfare systems deployed in Syria caused serious damage to the two most expensive American fighters - F-35 and F-22. "
      with translation “According to reports published by the US military, Russian electronic warfare systems deployed in Syria have caused serious damage to the two most expensive American fighters - the F-35 and F-22.”
      related to The National Interest?
      The source of gossip is the English-language site of the Russian edition of Avia.Pro.net
      http://avia-pro.net/news/rossiyskuyu-reb-krasuha-obvinili-v-polomke-istrebiteley-f-35-i-f-22
      If you go to The National Interest website and insert the word Krasuha in Search, you will find one article for 2017 with quotes from Russian publications praising electronic warfare of different classes and Amer comments on them.
      2017
      https://nationalinterest.org/feature/america-getting-outclassed-by-russian-electronic-warfare-22380
      The article does praise Russian EW and talk about the backlog of the US and NATO in this matter, but not a word about F-22/35.
      So you need to analyze more thoroughly, otherwise you’ll get tired of removing noodles from your ears ...
      1. +1
        22 February 2020 09: 31
        Your nickname speaks of a derogatory attitude towards the Russian language. Who do you work for? Where do you live? How old are you? What is your name?
        My name is Ruslan ... We will know each other ...
      2. +1
        22 February 2020 17: 16
        Aw, I didn’t understand, the answers to the questions where ???
      3. +1
        22 February 2020 18: 49
        What the hell ??? Afraid chtol ??? Do not be afraid...
  14. 0
    21 February 2020 15: 03
    The Chinese media report a phased modernization of the 5th generation fighter J-20, naming the parameter by which the aircraft surpassed the F-35.

    belay More recently, the same Chinese media wrote that the F-35 is almost no match for the J-20 in all respects! It turns out that the twin-engine J-20 "bypassed" the F-35 in the number of EXTERNAL suspension points.

    We are waiting for further stages of "modernization", maybe then they will surpass it in some way.
  15. +2
    21 February 2020 15: 45
    Sorry, of course, but it seems to me that the J-20 => a heavy air superiority fighter; while the F-35 => light multi-functional attack aircraft / fighter
    That is, they compare a camel with a horse.
    1. +2
      21 February 2020 16: 31
      It does not stop one from filling up another
    2. +1
      21 February 2020 18: 13
      Quote: Voletsky
      it seems to me that the J-20 => heavy air supremacy fighter

      which of the Chinese conqueror, damn it ??? From the pepelats - for striking at sea and land targets, the battle for him is secondary and very fraught
      1. +1
        21 February 2020 18: 27
        these are their words about the fact that their MIFIF duck and not mine, tell the Chinese people based on your centuries-old experience in the aircraft industry, why their bird is good :) I just clarified that the units being compared in different weight categories
        1. 0
          21 February 2020 18: 33
          Quote: Voletsky
          these are their words

          proof in studio

          Quote: Voletsky
          based on your centuries of experience in the aircraft industry

          how witty))) You do not have to be a great aircraft designer to understand that their J-20 is an air fighter like a glider from an iron. You reward this Chinese building with super-maneuverability and hypersound to the heap
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +1
            21 February 2020 18: 56
            Chinese Internet, this is of course something with something; if you run around there, you can read very serious fanfare about this flyer :)
            https://chinapower.csis.org/china-chengdu-j-20/

            now proof about its characteristics as an iron, I would like to hear from you.
            1. +2
              21 February 2020 19: 16
              Quote: Voletsky
              Chinese Internet, this is of course something with something; if you run around, you can read very serious fanfares about this flyer

              besides this (fanfare) there is nothing in your note. So where does it say that the J-20 is a fighter for gaining superiority in the sky ??? There will be a proof where the Chinese call it that ??? Not the most truthful press in the world, but the designer, the military?

              But I don’t have a proof, and I did not promise you it. As they say, everything is there, just look at the photo of the Chinese. A long fuselage with short wings of a small area, a duck, fuselage ridges (hi stealth) - the plane is unstable on the course, otherwise they would not be put on. The air intakes a la F-35, with which supersonic cried. Relatively low-power motors and a large mass. Fighter??? If this is not a strike aircraft, then I am the Roman emperor)
              1. +1
                21 February 2020 19: 33
                but I said somewhere that they call him that constructor? I said it is what the Chinese call it.
                from a bad mind to a healthy one, you stop it.
                1. +1
                  21 February 2020 19: 49
                  Quote: Voletsky
                  I said it so the Chinese call it

                  well, there is no need to broadcast the "most truthful in the world" Chinese media and the deepest opinions of sofa analysts
                  1. +2
                    21 February 2020 20: 04
                    Uncle Petya,?


                    this is a forum, everything is written here as you put it in style
                    "the most truthful in the world"
                    . + Here they are constantly throwing a dry plow, but you are telling me, I didn’t start it :)
  16. +1
    21 February 2020 16: 35
    I thought here again the lift power of the G-20 will begin to praise. But no, the G-20 has two longer missiles)
  17. 0
    21 February 2020 16: 35
    Shaw that, shaw that - shit
  18. +2
    21 February 2020 16: 38
    "Attention is drawn to the fighter with tail number 2013"

    Really pays. Many will think this is the year of release)
  19. +1
    21 February 2020 17: 43
    it is noted that missiles on external suspensions reduce the level of stealth of a combat aircraft.
    external pendants put stealth on a par with fourth-generation aircraft in terms of stealth characteristics.
    In this case, the Chinese should look at the F-15EX, which can drag as many as 22 air combat missiles.
    Pure PR from Beijing.
    Chinese aircraft will never reach the level of the American, and even more so to the Soviet. They can compete only in one indicator - mass production, and here the grandmother said in two
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. +1
    21 February 2020 20: 20
    They can surpass that of F-35, that of Su-57 only in terms of wear rate and failure rate.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"