In Ukraine, announced plans to create a multi-purpose missile system

66

Ukraine has gathered to create its own multi-purpose missile system. Such a task is indicated in the State Defense Order of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine for 2020.

The Ukrainian military department reports that the order to create the complex was given by the President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky himself. But about any detailed characteristics of the developed weapons not reported. It is also unclear whether this missile system is related to the Grom-2 operational-tactical missile system, better known as the Sapsan, that is already being developed. Earlier it was reported about the development of the Vilha rockets, which spent billions of hryvnias.



As you know, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine abandoned nuclear weapons, and then began to reduce the number of missile systems inherited by the Ukrainian armed forces. As a result, only the Soviet-made 9K79-1 Tochka-U missile systems remained in service with the Ukrainian army, but their operation was fraught with a number of problems.

First of all, Kiev was faced with a shortage of components, since the enterprises that produced them were located in other post-Soviet states. Ultimately, the leaders of Ukraine came to the conclusion that it was necessary to create new, already purely Ukrainian missile systems. So the project of the Sapsan OTRK appeared, and then the idea of ​​creating a new multi-purpose missile complex.

Specialists of the Yuzhnoye design bureau are working on Sapsan, and it was supposed to be produced at Yuzhmash (the Southern Machine-Building Plant) in Dnepropetrovsk (the new Ukrainian name for the city is Dnieper). But 14 years have already passed since the start of work, and OTRK has never entered serial production. “Sapsan” began to be developed in 2006, in 2013, according to the decision of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, the project was closed (officially - due to misuse of budget funds), and in 2016 they returned to it, obviously - for lack of the best offers.

The Sapsan OTRK can be armed with a single-stage ballistic missile, a long-range anti-aircraft missile, and an intermediate-range anti-ship missile. The maximum range of a ballistic missile was to be 280-480 km, anti-aircraft - 150 km, anti-ship - 90 km.

A fan of arms, the then President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko announced the allocation of funds for the further development of the operational-tactical missile system. In August 2018, at the military parade in honor of Independence Day of Ukraine, a prototype of the Sapsan OTRK was shown. But in February 2019, information became known that the Ukrainian military department was again not financing the work carried out by the Yuzhny Design Bureau.


Interestingly, back in December 2015, Alexander Turchinov, who at that time served as chairman of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, said that a new missile complex was being developed that would exceed the Sapsan OTRK in terms of its characteristics. Perhaps the complex that we are hearing about today was then announced by Turchinov?

The ambitious projects of Ukraine in terms of creating their own missile weapons, thus, appear to be a very dubious undertaking. The fate of the Sapsan OTRK is a typical confirmation of this. Of course, from Soviet times, modern Ukraine has got a fairly developed rocket industry, but during the 1990s - 2010s. its creative potential was largely lost. In addition, Kiev has simply no money for expensive development and, all the more, for launching new weapons in serial production.

A separate issue is bureaucratic obstacles and an incredibly high level of corruption, which also prevents any technological innovations. Therefore, it can be assumed that if Ukraine also has new missile systems of its own production in service, then this will happen very, very soon, perhaps in decades. This, incidentally, is also noted by many Ukrainian users, commenting on the Web information about the tests of the OTRK Grom-2. They rightly point out that if in countries - world leaders in rocket science such as the United States and Russia it takes up to 10 years to develop and launch production, then in Ukraine we will talk about 20-30 with vague final prospects.
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    20 February 2020 11: 23
    In Ukraine, gathered to create their own .......

    EVERYTHING, you can not read further.
    1. +2
      20 February 2020 11: 31
      Well, as they say ... Declare - Do not carry bags! wink what, why, at what capacities and against - Who? It would be better if we limited ourselves to the next “drawing”!
      1. -2
        20 February 2020 11: 38
        The boy collected / glued cardboard mock-ups from them ... the main thing is that there would be cardboard from under the candies ROSHENOK!
      2. +2
        20 February 2020 13: 04
        Quote: Hunter 2
        It would be better if we limited ourselves to the next “drawing”!

        So it will be limited, they will draw by hand and forward to the presentation. Huge plans, but to the point ... Eh, and what a military-industrial complex was, everyone in the city ... trampled on dirt.
      3. +4
        20 February 2020 13: 33
        Quote: Hunter 2
        State - Do not carry bags!

        Today I heard an interesting expression of the ancient Indians: "Better lightning in your hand than thunder in your mouth."
    2. DRM
      +3
      20 February 2020 13: 46
      Quote: rocket757
      In Ukraine, gathered to create their own .......

      EVERYTHING, you can not read further.

      Rocket, I understand your skepticism, but Ukraine can produce anything superior to its Soviet counterparts. New technological base + new software + old Soviet backlogs. Also, however, like Russia, only the order of money is lower.
      1. 0
        20 February 2020 13: 57
        Quote: DRM
        Ukraine can produce anything superior to its Soviet counterparts.

        Okay suppose wink can. WHERE IS THE RESULT, even one, even the smallest?
        I'm not talking about what was, let's see what remains?
    3. 0
      20 February 2020 14: 10
      It is enough that ONE TANK is produced !!!
      1. -3
        20 February 2020 14: 21
        Well, yes ... but when he was Soviet, somewhere from 800 tanks a year!
        How to understand this now? Gotcha, in general.
    4. +1
      21 February 2020 14: 11
      No, why not? It's so clean to neigh ... It looks like in Banderland "95th Quarter" has moved from concert halls to the Government and the Presidential Administration.
      1. 0
        21 February 2020 14: 20
        They were elected ... they live "cheerfully", this cannot be taken away from them.
  2. +9
    20 February 2020 11: 28
    Reminds us of space notes .....
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      20 February 2020 11: 33
      Quote: lopuhan2006
      Reminds us of space notes .....

      . EVERYTHING, you can not read further.

      Concrete and objective good
    3. 0
      21 February 2020 17: 00
      You, at least something is being launched into space, and we only have a national space agency - almost like NASA. They just forgot when the last time they started something.
      1. -3
        21 February 2020 17: 16
        I would like for all of us to have it again, and not separately, but will it be?
        1. 0
          21 February 2020 18: 09
          Until 2004, they cooperated normally. What will happen next, only God knows.
  3. +1
    20 February 2020 11: 29
    In Ukraine, announced plans to create a multi-purpose missile system
    How multipurpose is it or how much? Is this a "tactical anti-ship air defense missile system"?
    1. +1
      20 February 2020 11: 40
      Space Hyper-Looper-Interplanetary!
    2. +2
      20 February 2020 11: 59
      judging by the text of the article, we are talking about creating a universal launcher.
      can be armed with a single-stage ballistic missile, long-range anti-aircraft missile, medium-range anti-ship missile. The maximum range of a ballistic missile was to be 280-480 km, anti-aircraft - 150 km, anti-ship - 90 km.

      that is, a launcher for missiles of different types, but approximately the same size.
      I don’t know how realistic this is, especially in the Ukrainian version, but in principle the fleet in the world has long switched to universal launchers.
      This is not a complex, but a pure launcher; there is no radar in the composition.
      For a ballistic radar, in principle, it is not necessary, for long-range anti-aircraft missiles it does not make sense to put on any simplified launcher either, for long-range anti-aircraft missiles you can’t do without a simplified one, but there should be a two-coordinate radar with a range of 40-50 kilometers to the radio horizon.
      but it may be third-party in principle.
      hi
      1. 0
        20 February 2020 12: 22
        Quote: Avior
        but with RCC there should be a two-coordinate radar with a range of 40-50 kilometers, to the radio horizon.

        Avior (Sergey). Do not confuse radio visibility with the radio horizon! Moreover, the declared range of 90 km for firing anti-ship missiles.
        1. 0
          20 February 2020 12: 25
          For surface targets, this is one and the same if the radar tool capabilities provide a range for the radio horizon for a given type of target.
          But actually, I don’t see the launch radar, which means it’s supposed to be third-party, if we are talking about this launch.
          hi
          1. 0
            20 February 2020 12: 42
            Quote: Avior
            For surface purposes, this is one and the same.if the instrumental capabilities of the radar provide a range for the radio horizon for this type of target.

            You confuse the radio horizon with radio visibility! Take a simple calculator of the radio horizon and the range of direct radio visibility. An example is the height of the superstructure of the ship (target) - 60 meters, the height of your antenna is 10 meters. Calculate: the radio horizon is 13,03 km, and the range of the direct radio visibility of the target is 44,96 km. You just do not understand physics.
            1. +3
              20 February 2020 13: 03
              superstructure 60 m is 25-30 floors?
              aircraft carrier or what?
              noticeable goal, what can I say.
              hi
              1. +1
                20 February 2020 13: 14
                Avior, put you a big plus.
      2. DRM
        +1
        20 February 2020 13: 41
        Quote: Avior
        This is not a complex, but a pure launcher; there is no radar in the composition.
        For a ballistic radar, in principle, it is not necessary, for long-range anti-aircraft missiles it does not make sense to put on any simplified launcher either, for long-range anti-aircraft missiles you can’t do without a simplified one, but there should be a two-coordinate radar with a range of 40-50 kilometers to the radio horizon.
        but it may be third-party in principle.

        Read the VO materials on Ukrainian radar. Unfortunately I do not remember the year, look in the archive.
      3. 0
        20 February 2020 19: 07
        Quote: Avior
        that is, a launcher for missiles of various types,

        That is, this CP requires an "addition", in the form of a machine with a locator. moreover, to perform certain tasks, the car with the radar must be different, plus some kind of "Command Headquarters" on the car ...
        1. +1
          20 February 2020 22: 22
          On the one hand, and on the other, it is possible to strengthen the launch of existing complexes.
          Need-massive ballistic kick.
          Reflection of attacks from the sea - launchers reinforce RCC complexes
          Need- reinforce SAM
          In any case, you can’t put a radar on the launcher for a long-range air defense system, and on a PCR it can be separate or even without it.
          Look at the Ball or Bastion - they are not on the launchers.
    3. 0
      21 February 2020 17: 00
      And arm him with Bandera equestrian divers.
  4. -1
    20 February 2020 11: 42
    Rockets are an excuse to spend money.
  5. -1
    20 February 2020 11: 46
    Baron Munchausen, with tears in his eyes, is envious of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex and its missile developments.
    Ukraine needs the USSR to build something sensible.
    1. -3
      20 February 2020 12: 23
      Quote: Olya Tsako
      Ukraine needs the USSR to build something sensible.

      Ukraine needs Russia to live in prosperity and peace by one people.
      1. -1
        20 February 2020 12: 34
        After the capture of Crimea, your words look like the height of a misunderstanding, and this is mildly said:
        Quote: Olya Tsako
        Ukraine needs the USSR to build something sensible.

        Ukraine needs Russia to live in prosperity and peace by one people.
        1. -1
          20 February 2020 12: 40
          Quote: Dur_mod
          After the capture of Crimea, your words look like the height of a misunderstanding, and this is mildly said:

          I remind you that nobody has captured Crimea! After the collapse of the statehood (and state) of Ukraine as a result of the coup d'état, called the Maidan in 2014, Crimea, exercising its right to self-determination, left the former Ukraine and only then, being independent, asked to join Russia !!! The rest of the former Ukraine staged a civil war in the rest of the territory !!!!! hi
          1. -2
            20 February 2020 12: 45
            I remind you that a military operation to seize Crimea was condemned by the UN Security Council and almost all countries of the world that recognized this as Russian aggression. And tell tales about yourself, tell the green men ...
            1. +2
              20 February 2020 12: 48
              Quote: Dur_mod
              I remind you that a military operation to seize Crimea was condemned by the UN Security Council

              And sho, China and Russia voted for? Otherwise, this is a balabstvo of the interest of the Anglo-Saxons! Remind me how many Ukrainians died during the power capture of the Crimea ????? wassat And, most importantly, was there a coup in the former Ukraine? love
              1. -3
                20 February 2020 13: 11
                Hmm, I bow to your great logic: a neighbor broke into the house, took the room and says in court - I won’t blame myself for robbery and intrusion to the neighbors, they didn’t ask me but beat each other, so I’ll take the room from the neighbors and attach myself , So?
                Then sho Donbass, and what piss? So already so tired, take away with the condition of a ban on entry, trade, etc. forever.
                1. +1
                  20 February 2020 13: 22
                  Quote: Dur_mod
                  Hmm, I bow to your great logic: a neighbor broke into the house, took the room and says in court - I won’t blame myself for robbery and intrusion to the neighbors, they didn’t ask me but beat each other, so I’ll take the room from the neighbors and attach myself , So?

                  A little bit wrong, the bandits from Zapadnaya Street drove out the rightful owner of the apartment, moreover, with the use of weapons and bodily injuries, almost killing his whole family, the children of the neighbor said we did not want to live in the same apartment as bandits-selyuk and ...... drum roll ...... barricaded the old door, laying it with a brick and cut a new door to the former neighbors-relatives !!!!! good That's true, honest and objective. hi
            2. +3
              20 February 2020 13: 01
              Quote: Dur_mod
              I remind you that a military operation to seize Crimea was condemned by the UN Security Council and almost all countries of the world that recognized this as Russian aggression. A fairy tales about yourself came out tell the green men ...

              ===
              yes, no later than yesterday at a meeting of the United Nations Council condemned another attack by Russia (18 fierce zbroyn_ form of the Russian Federation 22 times destroyed the regime of prinenny bogun. Opponent firing our poses from the fence at the Minsk households of the artillery systems, the caliber is 152 mm and 122 mm, the caliber is 120 mm and 82 mm, the tank is also big, and the big systems are big, big systems ...), as well as Russia's non-compliance with the Minsk agreements.
              such tales
              1. -5
                20 February 2020 13: 13
                AND? Do you disagree?
                1. +2
                  20 February 2020 14: 02
                  Quote: Dur_mod
                  AND? Do you disagree?

                  ===
                  no, I'm still healthy
            3. 0
              20 February 2020 13: 34
              The UN Security Council is already like Obraztsov's puppet theater. You never know what they can "condemn" there. Another thing is important - they do not solve anything. The building is rented, only.
      2. 0
        14 July 2020 16: 25
        Where do you get this ???
  6. 0
    20 February 2020 11: 51
    https://youtu.be/GJXILWd1XQM
    A new tank has already been created !!!
  7. 0
    20 February 2020 12: 06
    Ukraine under the rule of Bandera wants to create its own wunderwaffe and defeat Russia))).
    1. 0
      14 July 2020 16: 25
      Not. The task is to protect the state of Ukraine from being captured by Russia
  8. 0
    20 February 2020 12: 26
    Announce plans !!! This is strong, you can even create a cartoon. Let’s face the peregrine falcons.
  9. +1
    20 February 2020 12: 37
    Am I missing something? Has April 1 already arrived?
    1. 0
      20 February 2020 13: 17
      In advance, they are building up the potential of explosive humor.
  10. 0
    20 February 2020 12: 43
    In a country of victorious idiocy, only a clown-idot can be president
    1. 0
      20 February 2020 16: 52
      Better Olena Kravets would have been elected, even though a beautiful woman. smile
  11. +2
    20 February 2020 13: 14
    But there were no plans to create a normal state.
  12. -2
    20 February 2020 13: 31
    they can "declare"! But "create" ....
  13. +1
    20 February 2020 13: 59
    With such budgetary problems, they just have enough money for advertising leaflets.
  14. 0
    20 February 2020 16: 24
    Is Luka going to throw a platform? To "please" Russia. A real ally ... of the Bandera.
  15. 0
    20 February 2020 16: 31
    Well, they took about 15 minutes and that's enough, you can continue to make something else to make.
  16. 0
    20 February 2020 18: 00
    This, incidentally, is also noted by many Ukrainian users, commenting on the Web information about the tests of the OTRK Grom-2. They rightly point out that if in countries - world leaders in rocket science such as the United States and Russia it takes up to 10 years to develop and launch production, then in Ukraine we will talk about 20-30 with vague final prospects.

    As they say - domaydanilis under the strict guidance of the State Department and the CIA. And now they have simply passed into the category of cannon fodder - a consumable in the war against the Russian Federation, for which it is banal and prepared by its best "friends." fool
  17. 0
    20 February 2020 18: 21
    It is also unclear whether this missile system has anything to do with the already developed operational-tactical missile system Grom-2, better known as the Sapsan.

    These are two completely different complexes. Yes, "Thunder-2" is being created using the developments on the "Sapsan" complex, but no more. the launchers are different, the missiles are different ...

    Quote: Hunter 2
    Well, as they say ... Declare - Do not carry bags! wink what, why, at what capacities and against - Who? It would be better if we limited ourselves to the next “drawing”!

    Generally speaking, you are in vain. The complex is being commissioned by Saudi Arabia. At what capacities - at Yuzhmash. In the future, it can be deployed to the Armed Forces of Ukraine instead of the old Tochka-U. Moreover, in terms of performance characteristics it surpasses the Tochka-U complex

    Quote: rocket757
    Well, yes ... but when he was Soviet, somewhere from 800 tanks a year!
    How to understand this now? Gotcha, in general.

    Victor! In Soviet life and UVZ produced about 2000 tanks a year. How much do we release now ??? Your post would be understandable if they let in 1 tank a year, and we, like in Soviet times, 2000. So we don’t have ice with that either

    Quote: svp67
    In Ukraine, announced plans to create a multi-purpose missile system
    How multipurpose is it or how much? Is this a "tactical anti-ship air defense missile system"?

    Sergei! The author speaks of "Sapsan", putting an equal sign between it and the "Thunder-2" complex. The first - "Sapsan" - really should have been multifunctional and use three types of missiles - ballistic, anti-aircraft, anti-ship. The "Grom-2" complex is equipped only with the "Grom-2" ballistic missiles (according to the TTT of Saudi Arabia). )

    Quote: Olya Tsako
    Baron Munchausen, with tears in his eyes, is envious of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex and its missile developments.
    Ukraine needs the USSR to build something sensible.

    The biggest stupidity is to sacredly believe that no one can do anything without Russia. Yes, Ukraine has almost complete failure with the military-industrial complex. The aircraft industry is at zero. Fleet - while doing something like armored boats. But they still try not to "multiply by zero" rocketry. And if they did not succeed in much in the 90s and early 2000s - the Borisfen and Sapsan complexes (due to lack of funding), now they are making Thunder-0 not with their own money, but with Saudi money. The rocket has performance characteristics consistent with the MTCR.

    Quote: Sergey 777
    With such budgetary problems, they just have enough money for advertising leaflets.

    What are the budget problems ?? The complex was originally created with money from Saudi Arabia. $ 300 million contract. And the Saudis will not allow their grandmothers to be "cut" just like that. So Ukraine will have to make a complex.

    Quote: Xenofont
    Is Luka going to throw a platform? To "please" Russia. A real ally ... of the Bandera.

    Chassis - KRAZvskoe, but not Belarusian ... Designed in Kharkov Design Bureau named after Morozova .....
    1. 0
      20 February 2020 19: 20
      They tried to mold the An-132 with Saudi money. Do you seriously think that Ukraine will succeed? The ceiling is ptrk and modernization from the fact that followed, something is good and something is not very. Not enough money for the Navy
      for already Iceland must be maintained. Aviation is not even funny. Now all that Ukraine has is needed only by it. The West has its own and it will not share the cake, Russia has already been lost for good, China will stand out last and go her own way, and only the post-Soviet heritage and modernization remains. I ask the question, and who is to blame? The capture of Crimea by Russia, Muscovites with Buryats from tank divisions from the Donbass, or still dig deeper into their homes. Russia was not the first to impose a single sanction against Ukraine. The problem of Ukraine is that its people decided, or said nothing when they decided that they are a separate nation, and not a people calling themselves Slavs from Ukraine, brothers of Slavs from Russia. However, in Russia there is no such thing. For there is an easily-herdable flock to which any Shapiro and Satanovsky can pour yellow water into his ears.
    2. 0
      12 August 2020 14: 48
      The military budget of Ukraine in 2020 is UAH 256. which at the maximum rate of UAH 000 set in the budget will amount to about $ 000 billion (as of August 000, 29,5, the rate is approximately UAH 8.67). The development of the OTRK "Grom-11.08.2020" is estimated at about $ 27,8 million.
  18. +2
    20 February 2020 19: 39
    Quote: lopuhan2006
    They tried to mold the An-132 with Saudi money. Do you seriously think that Ukraine will succeed? The ceiling is ptrk and modernization from the fact that followed, something is good and something is not very. Not enough money for the Navy

    I think yes, they will. Especially not with your own money. They have a school, old cadres still remain. To make a single-stage OTRK in the presence of money is not difficult.
    They are also closely engaged in modernization. At the very least, they made their own version of "Uranus" - the anti-ship missile system "Neptune", made their own version of "Smerch" - "Alder".
    1. 0
      20 February 2020 20: 00
      You are right, but to do it does not mean in sufficient quantities for the war, but it’s enough to pull the nerves and that will be introduced. And while there are resources and a base for 20 years, it’s precisely on the Soviet backlog. And then, either to the West or China to bow. But this is so far away ....
    2. 0
      21 February 2020 08: 33
      I'm embarrassed to ask - how many of these "Neptunes" are already in the ranks?
  19. -2
    21 February 2020 18: 27
    Quote: TermNachTER
    Until 2004, they cooperated normally. What will happen next, only God knows.

    I am a pessimist in this matter ...
  20. 0
    14 July 2020 15: 17
    And so:
    1. In Ukraine, there was no production of missiles for systems such as "Grad", "Smerch", "Uragan", as well as the production of cruise missiles and OTRK. In Soviet times, there were production of individual components, also in cooperation with the Russian Federation until 2014.
    2. As of July 2020:
    - Alder missiles were adopted for the Smerch MLRS remaining from the USSR with a flight range of 70 and 90 km and hitting accuracy up to 6 m from the design point;
    - passed state tests of the modification of the MLRS "Alder" with a cluster warhead - "Alder-R" and an increased range (up to 120 km) "Alder-M" (adopted and is being prepared for production from the end of 2020); the development of modifications with a range of 140, 160 and 200 km is underway;
    - passed the test of the MLRS "Typhoon-1" caliber 122 mm and a firing range of 40 km;
    - The anti-ship cruise missile "Neptune" with a range of 280 km passed state tests. speed 900-1000 km / h, warhead mass of 150 kg, flight from sea level at an altitude of 3-10 m, capable of hitting targets with a displacement of up to 5000 tons. The first missile combat battalion should be built by May 2021. For 2021, it is planned to build 3 divisions (1 for the Sea of ​​Azov and 2 for the Black Sea) with a total ammunition load of 216 missiles.
    2. Plans for the near future:
    - testing the MLRS "Alder" of new modifications (firing range 140 and 160 km with a warhead weight of 230 kg)
    - testing of OTRK "Thunder" in the following modifications: a) export version with a firing range of up to 280 km m warhead weighing 450 kg of cassette and monoblock type; b) a version for the APU with a firing range of up to 500 km and a warhead mass of 450 kg of cassette and monoblock type; c) a milking version of the APU with a monoblock warhead weighing 250 kg and a firing range of up to 750 km.
    3. Plans for the medium term:
    - creation of a domestic air defense system "Dnepr-1" in the class corresponding to the Russian S-400
    - creation of MLRS "Typhoon-2" cal. 220 mm and "Typhoon-4" cal. 400 mm with a firing range of up to 280 km
    - creation of a supersonic anti-ship supersonic missile "Molniya-1" airborne
    - Creation of sea and air modifications of the Neptune spacecraft
    4. Plans for the long term:
    - creation of a long-range subsonic cruise missile complex "Korshun-2"
    - creation of a medium-range ballistic missile with a target destruction range of 1200-1500 km
    - creation of a hybrid (subsonic / supersonic) medium-range cruise missile with a target destruction range of 1500-2000 km
    - creation of a hypersonic cruise missile (no data)

    In addition, Ukrainian-made mobile launchers for MLRS "Verba", "Berest", "Alder", KR "Neptun", OTRK "Grom-2", etc. are in various degrees of readiness.
  21. 0
    14 July 2020 15: 38
    In terms of timeline - near perspective 2020-2022, medium - 2022-2025 and long-term 2025-2028
  22. 0
    14 July 2020 16: 27
    Oh yes, I completely forgot - all missiles are developed and created in a closed cycle
  23. The comment was deleted.