Confirmation of the strike on the province of Latakia from the Mediterranean

Confirmation of the strike on the province of Latakia from the Mediterranean

The night before, the air defense system of the Syrian Arab Republic was activated in the west of the country. The materials of the Syrian television reported that unknown forces carried out shelling of the surroundings of Jebla, located in the province of Latakia.


Recall that in Latakia is located the air base of the Russian Aerospace Forces Khmeimim. Jeble is located not far from the place of deployment of the Russian military.

Particular attention is drawn to the fact that a missile strike was carried out, according to Syrian sources, from the Mediterranean Sea. This information is verified by CAA. At the same time, there is no data on exactly with what means the rockets were launched. According to some reports, we are talking about aviation, which dealt a blow to the infrastructure of the government forces of the country.

The materials do not currently report how effectively Syria's air defense calculations worked out in terms of intercepting enemy missiles.

It is noteworthy that news about the shelling of the western province of Syria, one of the first to appear in the Israeli media. It confirms the evidence that the shelling was fought in the direction of the position of the Syrian government forces.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

102 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Finches 20 February 2020 06: 25 New
    • 14
    • 82
    -68
    Where from in Syria, Syrian air defense calculations .... laughing
    1. Shurik70 20 February 2020 07: 35 New
      • 42
      • 13
      +29
      In Syria, one of the most experienced air defense calculations, using old equipment, knocking down most of the Israeli missiles.
      But here, it seems, Turkey is already anonymizing.
      1. Finches 20 February 2020 07: 45 New
        • 13
        • 62
        -49
        Oh well..... laughing Blessed is he who believes!
        1. Cyrus 21 February 2020 17: 17 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          And besides a stupid emoticon and a proverb, neither to the village, nor to the city, is there anything essentially to say?
          1. Finches 21 February 2020 18: 32 New
            • 3
            • 5
            -2
            No, but I am a fount of stupid emoticons and proverbs ... I can share! laughing
      2. Teacher67 20 February 2020 09: 31 New
        • 20
        • 106
        -86
        Syrian and Russian air defense are not effective against the Israeli Air Force, it has been proven in practice. Not a single Israeli plane was shot down.
        1. boss 20 February 2020 10: 19 New
          • 21
          • 85
          -64
          again urry-minusers!
          what is wrong?
          not a single aircraft was shot down in 4 years of air raids, except for its own, this is a fact.
          Based on this, the author concludes that the air defense systems are ineffective.
          has the right to such a conclusion.
          come on, minus the truth!
          1. Arberes 20 February 2020 11: 00 New
            • 62
            • 6
            +56
            Quote: patron
            haven’t shot down a single aircraft in 4 years of air raids,

            Let me remind you of some facts.
            2017 - Destruction of the Turkish F-4 off the Syrian coast.
            2018 - Israeli F-16 received serious damage from the Syrian anti-aircraft complex S - 200ti and fell in Israel. One pilot was seriously injured.
            And you say - "not a single one" ??? For distorting historical facts minus you from a pure heart. yes
            1. Teacher67 20 February 2020 11: 25 New
              • 11
              • 63
              -52
              F-4 aircraft of the Vietnam War, one f-16 for such an amount of time, this is a drop in the bucket.
              1. Arberes 20 February 2020 11: 32 New
                • 38
                • 3
                +35
                Quote: Teacher67
                F-4 plane of times of the Vietnam war

                Well, he went through modernization. The Japanese Air Force still stands ... for now. The S-200ti air defense missile defense system also seems to be not the latest and nothing ... it worked as it should.
                Quote: Teacher67
                one f-16 for such an amount of time is a drop in the bucket.

                But it is destroyed. Most of all, I don’t like it when facts and history are distorted or distorted.
                What was, was. hi
                1. Nikolay3 20 February 2020 17: 16 New
                  • 23
                  • 0
                  +23
                  Quote: patron
                  not a single aircraft was shot down in 4 years of air raids, except for its own, this is a fact.
                  Based on this, the author concludes that the air defense systems are ineffective.
                  has the right to such a conclusion.

                  If you shoot missiles from afar, as well as from someone else’s territory of Lebanon, and then immediately “wash off” and sometimes hide behind other people's planes, as the Jews do, then fortune is on their side. This is not forever! The time will come - they will answer for everything.
                  1. Shurik70 20 February 2020 18: 33 New
                    • 11
                    • 1
                    +10
                    So Israel is not included in the air defense zone.
                    From a distance hollows. Moreover, just in case, not from its territory, but from the territory of Lebanon. What if they did get knocked down, the plane did not fall on their heads.
              2. sivuch 20 February 2020 11: 46 New
                • 36
                • 4
                +32
                But you wrote that none at all, i.e. lied
            2. boss 20 February 2020 12: 27 New
              • 6
              • 40
              -34
              and you say that since the 17th year air defense has been working efficiently, minus minus with a pure heart ???
              giving example 2 successful answers?
              and how many raids were there?
              I’m sure that if you bombed your house, the assessment of effectiveness was different for you, also with a pure heart.
              1. Arberes 20 February 2020 13: 12 New
                • 23
                • 2
                +21
                Quote: patron
                and you say that since the 17th year, air defense has been working efficiently,

                Once again, dear boss
                You stated that Syrian air defense did not bring down a single aircraft of enemy states, your words.
                Read my answer above.
                At the expense of the effectiveness of Syrian air defense, I did not even stutter, I swear by my radiculitis.
                I can’t even put a minus out of principle.
              2. DMB_95 20 February 2020 13: 56 New
                • 15
                • 0
                +15
                Quote: patron
                and you say that since the 17th year air defense has been working efficiently, minus minus with a pure heart ???
                giving example 2 successful answers?

                Why aren’t you writing about the downed KR and KAB? Didn't they get knocked down?
            3. boss 20 February 2020 18: 40 New
              • 1
              • 16
              -15
              for four years of war and dozens, if not hundreds of airstrikes, yes, just two damaged aircraft - THESE IS NOTHING, count how many Syrian equipment were shot down?
              ours and even more (
              What kind of efficiency are we talking about?
              how they hit a rocket, so urra, but as you do not watch the news, then objects are destroyed.
              Where are you, dear Arberis, have you seen efficiency? I do not know
              only our bases are covered, but there are not Syrian air defenses.
              1. Igor Aviator 20 February 2020 20: 59 New
                • 15
                • 3
                +12
                Quote: patron
                Where are you, dear Arberis, have you seen efficiency?

                Firstly, it’s not for you to judge the effectiveness of air defense operations - since you are absolutely ignorant of the issue, from the word “completely”, since the air defense efficiency is estimated by the number of aircraft shot down. To debate this topic, because of your short memory and commitment, as well as absolute illiteracy in the goals and objectives of air defense, I consider it pointless - to conscience the enemy - only shake the air! And, judging by your remark, I correctly assessed YOU, therefore Adyu!
              2. Cyrus 21 February 2020 17: 20 New
                • 2
                • 3
                -1
                You now look like worms in a pan ..
          2. DMB_95 20 February 2020 13: 48 New
            • 13
            • 2
            +11
            Quote: patron
            again urry-minusers!
            what is wrong? !

            Not there "written". Write to another place.
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. tomket 21 February 2020 17: 46 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            Quote: patron
            come on, minus the truth!

            You are not being minuscule for the truth that you are voting here. And for a lie.
            Quote: patron
            not a single aircraft was shot down in 4 years of air raids, except for its own, this is a fact.

            They shot down an Israeli f-16, that's a fact. If you were smarter, you wouldn’t write nonsense about “no one was beaten for 4 years”.
        2. orionvitt 20 February 2020 11: 18 New
          • 28
          • 5
          +23
          Quote: Teacher67
          Not a single Israeli plane was shot down

          Go oversleep. Can you imagine what would happen if Russia shot down an Israeli plane? Yes, the whole west and the God-chosen on guano will leave. There is a contract. You do not touch the Russian in Syria, we do not touch you. Or do you doubt that it will not be difficult for Russia to “land” several Israeli “airplanes”?
          1. Teacher67 20 February 2020 11: 26 New
            • 4
            • 32
            -28
            And what prevents under the guise of Syrians to shoot down Israeli planes?
            1. orionvitt 20 February 2020 11: 34 New
              • 27
              • 1
              +26
              Nothing interferes, that's just stupid there. Both from Russia and Israel. Jews can be blamed for anything, but not for stupidity.
              1. Teacher67 20 February 2020 11: 39 New
                • 2
                • 23
                -21
                How is it that the Syrians are studying with us, it turns out that they are either poorly trained, or the matter is in technology.
                1. orionvitt 20 February 2020 11: 48 New
                  • 20
                  • 2
                  +18
                  Quote: Teacher67
                  How is it that the Syrians are studying with us, it turns out that they are either poorly trained, or the matter is in technology.

                  As my father’s classmate at a military school said when he was a military adviser to Syria (back in the Soviet Union), in the hands of an Arab, even the most modern and perfect weapon turns into iron. Or does not work, or shoots very poorly. Among them were smart guys, but few. And the total mass, with their mentality, is something. Why do you think tiny Israel, being in an aggressive environment, successfully opposes the entire slave world? Not because he is so cool, but because such enemies in the war as the Arabs need to look for.
                  1. hydrox 20 February 2020 17: 17 New
                    • 4
                    • 1
                    +3
                    By the way, I wonder why they are silent about the incident in the vicinity of Khmeimim last week.
                    Some Israeli on the F-15 was noticed in carrying out incomprehensible maneuvers at the extreme distance from the S-400, and something in his behavior did not like: the launch was made and the damaged aircraft reached its territory with great difficulty.
                    For what I bought, for the same I’m selling it - maybe someone heard something about this fresh thing?
                  2. Essex62 20 February 2020 20: 24 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    And, successfully knocking out barmaley, the army of SAA does not consist of Arabs?
                    1. orionvitt 20 February 2020 22: 59 New
                      • 4
                      • 0
                      +4
                      Quote: Essex62
                      And, successfully knocking out barmaley, the army of SAA does not consist of Arabs?

                      Something until 2015, this army had no success. Quite the contrary, they suffered a crushing defeat in all directions. Syria and Assad were saved only by a miracle, in the form of the Russian Air Force, special operations forces and command, represented by officers of the General Staff of Russia. Any objections? If so, carefully study the chronicle of Syrian events.
                      1. Essex62 20 February 2020 23: 52 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Not any. This is exactly what happens. But after all, from the Arab fighters, under competent guidance. Master and assimilate. Although you can agree, the percentage of qualified specialists is small. Well, so in the SA from the Soviet Eastern Republics in the air defense did not serve much. More and more gunners-BSL operators. Literacy is required by the profession, and they have "a comrade two majors listening to the nightstand"
                  3. Essex62 20 February 2020 20: 24 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    And, successfully knocking out barmaley, the army of SAA does not consist of Arabs?
                2. sivuch 20 February 2020 11: 54 New
                  • 7
                  • 1
                  +6
                  not without it . And yet - the material did not succumb request
                  How many savvy cadres do they have after a long civil war? Many ran to the greenery - who then knew that Assad would win. The quote refers to the year 82 and specifically to EW, but do you think something has changed since then?
                  http://forums.airbase.ru/2012/05/t39268_7--vopros-skydrony.6187.html
                  Bekaa Valley 1982
                  ..... my former college teacher, he talked about the features of work in those conditions.
                  If in a nutshell: the problems were not so much technical as organizational ones, and these problems greatly affected the results of the work.
                  And over time (when I gained practical experience) I understood everything that he had in mind and I did not have the slightest doubt in his story.
                  Brief (without explanation of reasons) conclusions:
                  The concept of the Arabs about radio discipline, the analysis of REO, the protection of their own RES - were simply none ....
                  The illiterate use of technology, the abuse of radio communications and the work of RTS on radiation, naive and clumsy measures to counter enemy reconnaissance - according to him, this was widespread.
                  A few memorable phrases, almost verbatim:
                  "There is a lot of enthusiasm, and skills - 0 point hell." , "when we leave - everything will be bent for them." on the subject of radio discipline: "even if they’ve got a head count on them."
                  In general, in his opinion, the Syrians (he was in Syria, but I don’t remember which year) were not ready to use this technique (I repeat - these are simple and reliable samples) neither psychologically nor technically.
                  So the Syrians are shooting down part of the missiles - and they can’t do anything else
                  1. Alexey RA 20 February 2020 19: 38 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: sivuch
                    How many savvy cadres do they have after a long civil war?

                    And did they still live after so many years of civil war system Air defense? Due to the small number of personnel and large dimensions of equipment, RTBs (and indeed ZRN) are excellent targets for "fighters against the regime." The vulnerability of RTV in the First Chechen complained.
                    In order to strengthen the low-altitude radar field, separate radar platoons and companies with radar systems around the clock were deployed in the most probable directions at the borders with Chechnya. Constantly carried out duty and at the posts of visual observation. It should be noted that special difficulties fell on the units of the radioengineering forces, since individual radar platoons were few in number, and this significantly complicated the proper protection and defense of their positions.

                    If you gouge out the “eyes” of the air defense along the perimeter, then you won’t get much on the remnants inside the country and the division radar.
            2. DMB_95 21 February 2020 11: 06 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: Teacher67
              And what prevents under the guise of Syrians to shoot down Israeli planes?

              Shoot down planes that operate on Syrian territory without entering Syrian airspace - this Syria now can not afford. Syria does not need a war with Israel right now.
          2. boss 20 February 2020 18: 48 New
            • 1
            • 6
            -5
            if you slept, it’s about the inefficiency of Syrian air defense, which, incidentally, precisely because of inefficiency, managed to bring down our silt.
            and even after that, you agree with their effectiveness ...
        3. Romka47 20 February 2020 12: 07 New
          • 15
          • 4
          +11
          Maybe because not a single Israeli plane ever entered the sky of Syria? Yes, and shot down by the way, but how many KR shot down? That's when real Jews write, they de give such stupid reasons to be discredited (people are smart for the most part), so I respect them here, and you ... well, hold on, Syria’s air defense works well against modern Kyrgyz Republics and the Tomogawks, planes are not fired for objective reasons that only distant ones can’t understand, the second point, but how does Israel’s air defense system (a la the coolest) work against Palestinian pseudo-missiles? And by the way, Yes, Israeli soldiers and tankers are some of the best in the world, the fact that they do not go under Syrian air defense says a lot.
        4. Artunis 20 February 2020 15: 37 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          But no one has yet tried to bring down the aircraft, they will need to be knocked down as cute.
        5. Spambox 20 February 2020 18: 25 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Was f16 barely reached the promised land, they say the Beech has come (Cube messages vary)
        6. Separ 20 February 2020 19: 19 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          And what did you have to shoot down? So we can ... still on take-off and along with the destruction of the take-off place.
        7. Nordic777 20 February 2020 20: 48 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          In such a situation with the relief, tactics, you DO NOT need to shoot down, you need to destroy it. Fool understands☝
        8. tomket 21 February 2020 17: 42 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Teacher67
          Syrian and Russian air defense are not effective against the Israeli Air Force, it has been proven in practice. Not a single Israeli plane was shot down.

          You probably have a short memory, and you forgot how the Israeli Suf was shot down
        9. Cycle boss 21 February 2020 22: 14 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          They didn’t shoot simply .. if there was a team to blame for defeat .. in the air they wouldn’t flaunt
      3. Foxnova 20 February 2020 10: 52 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Well naturally
      4. Voltsky 20 February 2020 21: 13 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Yes, I would also say that Turkey somewhere passed by when this happened.
    2. Campanella 20 February 2020 17: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Where did you get this gun? From there! .... (Diamond hand)
      Missiles from nowhere, complexes from nowhere ... everything mixed up in Syria. The boys staged a battle wall to wall, which is not clear?
  2. Mountain shooter 20 February 2020 06: 26 New
    • 20
    • 5
    +15
    And again it is unknown - who and what? Even ours and Khmeimim do not see? Most likely, they kept the information secret, as usual ... ours kept it secret ... And in fact, all these "injections" are more like "reconnaissance in force", to reveal the structure and capabilities of the air defense system. Well, there is no need to help them ...
    1. bessmertniy 20 February 2020 06: 35 New
      • 17
      • 2
      +15
      For the first time, perhaps unidentified flying objects strike Syria !? And without secrets, you can guess from whom the blow. negative
      1. anjey 20 February 2020 06: 50 New
        • 27
        • 3
        +24
        The Alien Sons of David laughingon their UFO-35 laughing .
        1. maidan.izrailovich 20 February 2020 07: 17 New
          • 19
          • 1
          +18
          The alien sons of David laughingin their UFO-35

          Perhaps, but not a fact.
          Latakia borders on Turkey. Given Turkey’s increasing aggression, the Turks could well strike from the sea. If this is so, then it is clear why it is secret and why they did not “identify” the attackers.
          1. orionvitt 20 February 2020 11: 21 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Quote: maidan.izrailovich
            why they didn’t “identify” the attackers

            How do you know that you did not recognize? On the other hand, note that the blow was not inflicted on Russian positions, but next. They knew in whom it was possible and in whom it was impossible. So to speak, a hint. I suspect that the Russian command is well aware of where the "wind is blowing."
    2. SSR
      SSR 20 February 2020 07: 18 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And in fact, all these “injections” are more likely “reconnaissance by battle,” to reveal the structure and capabilities of the air defense system.

      On one ordinary day, a screwdriver may also blow. If clearly catch.
    3. Hartakolo12 20 February 2020 08: 59 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Jebla is next to himeim. Our must see
    4. Ka-52 20 February 2020 09: 01 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      And again it is unknown - who and what? Even ours and Khmeimim do not see?

      ours cannot but see. Because even without taking into account the capabilities of early warning stations, the water area of ​​the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea is controlled by Russian complexes in Tartus. Distance from Tartus to Latakia - less than 100km
  3. DMB 75 20 February 2020 06: 31 New
    • 20
    • 3
    +17
    It is noteworthy that the news about the shelling of the western province of Syria was one of the first to be published in the Israeli media.

    On the thief and the hat burns.
    1. Aaron Zawi 20 February 2020 06: 44 New
      • 17
      • 14
      +3
      Quote: DMB 75
      It is noteworthy that the news about the shelling of the western province of Syria was one of the first to be published in the Israeli media.

      On the thief and the hat burns.

      Give you a link to TAAS? For example, I read about the raid there and half an hour before we reported it. Yes, and some kind of weird raid. Neither photo nor video even about the operation of air defense. It seems that again the UAV from the sticks flew in, only in a circular way.
      1. LiSiCyn 20 February 2020 09: 33 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Aaron hi
        Something I, too, did not find any evidence. request
        Already a couple of weeks, rumors are being thrown about strengthening coastal protection in the Tartus region. From sabotage groups. It is possible to launch an UAV from "water" ...
    2. gmb
      gmb 20 February 2020 06: 44 New
      • 9
      • 8
      +1
      The author is incorrect, in Israeli news, there is a link to Syrian sources, for example, Sana’s agency or Syria’s state television, in this case it’s about drones that attacked the Russian base, and a downing was announced.
  4. Dikson 20 February 2020 06: 48 New
    • 5
    • 8
    -3
    And what, Charles De Gaulle has already left Syria?
  5. Lamata 20 February 2020 06: 56 New
    • 13
    • 20
    -7
    Mlyn, and accidentally launch the Jews unidentified hotels? Well, something flew from the sea. Dap them now
    1. Zeev Zeev 20 February 2020 07: 26 New
      • 9
      • 23
      -14
      Some of them have already started. So then, Israel was accused of attacking sovereign Syria.
    2. gmb
      gmb 20 February 2020 07: 30 New
      • 8
      • 15
      -7
      You are only more careful, and then winter, the Mediterranean Sea is restless, and you attack from the couch
      1. Lamata 20 February 2020 08: 36 New
        • 6
        • 11
        -5
        I’ve got a pitching damper on my sofa.
  6. Adam Khomich 20 February 2020 07: 04 New
    • 9
    • 4
    +5
    I guess the identity of the attackers from the first syllable .... From ....
    Does anyone else doubt this?
    1. gmb
      gmb 20 February 2020 07: 27 New
      • 6
      • 9
      -3
      Adam is a Jewish name, you are more careful
      1. Adam Khomich 20 February 2020 07: 28 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        All names are Biblical or from Greek myths :-)
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Vladimir_6 20 February 2020 11: 47 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: gmb
        Adam is a Jewish name, you are more careful

        This name is also common among Chechens, only the accent on the first letter "A".
      4. Egor53 20 February 2020 14: 56 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Adam is a biblical name, not a Hebrew one.
    2. Ross xnumx 20 February 2020 08: 09 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      Quote: Adam Khomich
      I guess the identity of the attackers from the first syllable ...

      So write:
      I guess the identity of the attackers "From" two letters ... laughing
  7. Zeev Zeev 20 February 2020 07: 37 New
    • 6
    • 12
    -6
    Can I give a link to the Israeli media, where is this news? I personally haven’t found one
    1. Adam Khomich 20 February 2020 07: 41 New
      • 8
      • 4
      +4
      Send inquiries to Tzahal or Mossad. Maybe they will help you there :-)
      1. Zeev Zeev 20 February 2020 08: 30 New
        • 3
        • 8
        -5
        That is, there will be no links.
    2. Vitaly gusin 20 February 2020 10: 16 New
      • 4
      • 8
      -4
      Quote: Zeev Zeev
      Can I give a link to the Israeli media, where is this news? I personally haven’t found one

      Hi!
      Nobody will give you anything.
      Most have strabismus in one direction, both in vision and in thinking.
      ynet.
      דיווח בסוריה: מערכות ההגנה האווירית הופעלו בצפון המדינה
      פורסם: 19.02.20, 21:30 p.m.
      מערכות ההגנה האווירית של סוריה יירטו "מטרות עוינות" בעיירה ג'בלה שמדרום ללטקייה. כך דיווחה הטלוויזיה הממלכתית במדינה. המערכות הופעלו בעקבות רחפנים שניסו להתקרב לבסיס חמיימים הרוסי שנמצא באזור. לא דווח על נזק או על נפגעים.
      (דניאל סלאמה)
      Syria Reporting: Air Defense Systems
      Posted: 19.02.20/21/30, XNUMX:XNUMX p.m.
      Syrian air defense systems intercepted "hostile targets" in the city of Jabbalah south of Latkia. So reported by state television in the country. The systems intercepted drones trying to get closer to the Russian base in the area. No injuries or injuries have been reported.
      (Daniel Salame)
      THE BALL IS COMPLETED, EXTENDED CANDLES!
      1. Adam Khomich 20 February 2020 10: 25 New
        • 3
        • 5
        -2
        Wowooo .... So the drones by themselves from the Mediterranean side arrived?
        Not ... well, not soo ... and, huh? That's what this artificial intelligence does!
        It should be a lawsuit. intelligence to send something in response.
  8. Livonetc 20 February 2020 07: 54 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    There Trump and Erdogan also assert themselves.
    Macron was weaker than others, and what to take from the Gerontophile’s jacket.
    Meanwhile, the territory of Syria freed from scum is increasing.
  9. Vitaly gusin 20 February 2020 09: 32 New
    • 2
    • 16
    -14
    The night before, the air defense system of the Syrian Arab Republic was activated in the west of the country
    The materials do not currently report how effectively Syria's air defense calculations worked out in terms of intercepting enemy missiles.

    Once again.
    When rockets are shot down, they fall but do not evaporate.
    And when they fall, they are collected and made a presentation about how great the air defense works and who owns the missiles.


    But so far, we have not seen anything, but we read and amicably discuss how SANA, Sina, Avia.pro, and of course kissel TV, shoot down missiles
    1. sivuch 20 February 2020 10: 01 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      And you are aware that self-liquidator is usually put on missiles and a presentation can be arranged only in the following coinciding cases - if it didn’t work and if there is time, opportunity and desire to search. Because there is no point in showing small pieces - they can always say that these are fragments of a rocket that hit a target.
      But, in principle, there were videos, and the wreckage of Delilah showed that it was interesting - not the army, but the locals.
      1. Adam Khomich 20 February 2020 10: 34 New
        • 4
        • 4
        0
        I remember when Trump launched a hundred Axes in Syria, so one of them flew all the way to Moscow! Not self-destructing !!! Zradnyk or defector probably!
        1. sivuch 20 February 2020 11: 15 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          So there are smart rockets and there are very smart ones. This turned on the on-board anhrenator and decided not to die ahead of time.
          1. Adam Khomich 20 February 2020 11: 18 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Serving Russia laughing laughing
          2. Alexey RA 20 February 2020 19: 40 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: sivuch
            So there are smart rockets and there are very smart

            The tests of the artificial intelligence bomb ended in failure. Smart bomb refused to leave the plane. © smile
      2. Vitaly gusin 20 February 2020 11: 27 New
        • 2
        • 6
        -4
        And you know that not all missiles in Israel put liquidation itself.
        And once again, the missiles do not evaporate, there are always bumps, you yourself wrote about it.
        Just that the news conveyed what I wrote above.
        Once again.
        All disassembly in Syria, Israel is not interested. Besides
        missile bases that Iran wants to have in Syria.
        1. sivuch 20 February 2020 11: 45 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          And you know that not all missiles in Israel put liquidation itself.
          No, it is not known. Tell me, bevakasha, on which missiles the self-liquidator is putting, and on which - not.
          Therefore, he wrote that it makes no sense to show small fragments. Who does not want to believe - still will not believe.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. sivuch 20 February 2020 13: 55 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Those. You don’t know, but for some reason you confidently assert -And you know that not all missiles in Israel put liquidation itself.
              And photos are usually signed.
              1. Vitaly gusin 20 February 2020 14: 47 New
                • 1
                • 3
                -2
                Good Buddha, do not be lazy, everything is on google
                1. sivuch 20 February 2020 15: 18 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Sorry, you didn’t know about the existence of self-liquidators on missiles (except, perhaps, anti-aircraft), until I wrote about them.
                  And the phrase about Google, I'm sorry, is simply stupid (I tried it softer). There is far from everything in Google. A simple example - when did the public learn about Peer (הפרא)?
                  1. Vitaly gusin 20 February 2020 16: 40 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    Well, you found
                    That's right, anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense.
                    For weight reduction. It is known in advance that these missiles can fall on enemy territory, and there’s nothing to copy because it’s not a separate rocket but a whole system, it’s like in the alphabet, one A is not enough.
      3. Piramidon 20 February 2020 12: 04 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: sivuch
        Do you know that rockets are usually self-destructive

        What are self-liquidators used for? To destroy a rocket if something went wrong. And when it is hit by air defense systems (together with self-destructive equipment), then what kind of self-destructive means can it be?
        1. sivuch 20 February 2020 13: 01 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          If a rocket is shot down - this is not so. And so - this is when a rocket destroys a target
          1. Piramidon 20 February 2020 13: 02 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: sivuch
            If a rocket is shot down - this is not so

            "Not so" is if she suddenly went the wrong way. And if they bring her down, then the self-liquidator will be covered.
            1. sivuch 20 February 2020 13: 58 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              And that too. And also - so that the rocket does not consider any interesting details, such as GOS or RV. Shots are different - sometimes for molecules, and sometimes the glider is damaged relatively weakly.
              1. Piramidon 20 February 2020 16: 32 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Quote: sivuch
                There are different downs

                It's a deal then hi In addition, what is initially needed for self-liquidation.
    2. Adam Khomich 20 February 2020 10: 30 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      How many presentations did you make with Mossad?
      The Russian Ministry of Defense showed weapons and ammunition from the USA and NATO countries seized from ISIS (a banned terrorist organization led by the CIA in the Russian Federation)!
      So what? Someone somehow reacted to this? Yes, they catch them red-handed, and they are in the excuse. Only high-likes in mainstream are in demand. The rest is garbage.
    3. Romka47 20 February 2020 12: 11 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Your end for you, but where are the proofs of destroyed objects? when they do not shoot down anything, destroyed objects (goals) appear Proofs in the studio. a self-liquidator can work out on a rocket even after a shot, part of our position can be explained, but the goals are not "self-healing"
  10. Alexey from Perm 20 February 2020 09: 37 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    what kind of enemy is this)))
  11. Karislav 20 February 2020 10: 49 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    unknown forces)) .. aliens ???? funny ...
  12. Elephant 20 February 2020 12: 10 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And what does our satellite constellation, ground, air and sea radars do. Or it is impossible to track exactly where and by what carriers rocket launches were made. I would like to know about this!
  13. kriten 20 February 2020 12: 43 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    And ours around Syria do not control the sky at all. Neither heaven nor sea - nothing? some kind of mess turns out. Or they just hide that the best partners are shooting (go from NATO).
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. Campanella 20 February 2020 17: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It would be nice to cover not only the shock part, but also the carrier, so that next time with your ass felt the seriousness of the moment. And then the American buns-shot-forgot ..... I forgot and then you greetings from the underworld!
  16. Ivan7527 20 February 2020 17: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Israeli 35-ku, our calculation of 300 in the tail beat. Awards found heroes.
    1. Vitaly gusin 20 February 2020 21: 52 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Quote: Ivan7527
      Israeli 35-ku, our calculation of 300 in the tail beat. Awards found heroes.

      And you do not dream of a roar ....... laughing
  17. ugol2 20 February 2020 20: 20 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    According to some reports, we are talking about aviation, which inflicted a blow on the infrastructure of the government forces of the country.

    Well, and whose aviation there is naughty?
    Same to me as an open secret. Turks and Jews.
  18. remal 21 February 2020 21: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The enemy is not sleeping.