Ultralight rocket for “budget” launches to appear in Russia

Russian scientists are engaged in the creation of a space rocket that is superior in its parameters to similar developments of competitors. Work is planned to be completed by 2025. The estimated cost of the project is 2,5 billion rubles, which according to the calculations of the creators should pay off in 12 launches.

About this to the newspaper "Izvestia" рассказал VNH-Energo employee Pavel Chernyshev.

The device is a reusable ultralight rocket designed to deliver micro- and nanosatellites to the Earth’s 200-kilometer orbit. The main goal set by the developers is the record low cost of space cargo delivery. Presumably, it will amount to 12 thousand dollars per kilogram of payload. The closest competitor to the Russian spacecraft, the Elektron rocket from the American company Rocket Lab, costs twice as much to deliver a kilogram of space cargo.

Russian developers plan to achieve this result through the use of a single-stage carrier design and an innovative configuration of the engine nozzle that can operate in any mode at different heights. If you change the altitude of the rocket, it will not lose traction.

Comments

[Topgun]

Interesting, good luck in your work!
although the word "project", to be honest, is already starting to get boring ...

[Vol4ara]

It is planned, will appear, developed, discussed, agreed.
When I read the news about astronautics, a strange smack of shit arises, as if someone, through the media, is trying to feed me

[Svarog]

They want to say that a little more and we will become the most advanced in all key areas .. but the problem is that they have been talking about this for so long .. and our leadership is farther from us and will soon compete with African countries ..

[g1washntwn]

Quote: Vol4ara

When I read the news about astronautics there is a strange smack of shit

(facepalm) Where is this smack do you even know

[Donald72]

Dare not appropriate.

[g1washntwn]

Was I trying to make him admit his taste preferences? Analogies must be appropriate. So it was just that "comrade" who offended the others by comparison, which was indicated to him.

[orionvitt]

Quote: g1washntwn

How do you even know this taste?

This is the standard food of the creative. We got used to eating from the western trough, now the taste is repulsed for life.

[Yngvar]

In the Soviet Union they did everything "in silence", they reported only on the fact! And on very effective facts! And now all the "pounding on the chest with fists and heels"! It is necessary to whip according to the end result, and not according to "promises" ...

[loki565]

I agree, 50 missiles crashed - it doesn’t matter))) the main thing is that the 51st flew and the average man knows nothing and sleeps peacefully)))

[missuris]

Before, they also pounded on the chest with fists and heels only in front of the leaders of the state, because only they gave money and had money.
and now everyone can give money)

[L-39NG]

To those comrades who do not understand and give in, they explain that everything is fine, "beautiful marquise"

[Paranoid50]

Quote: L-39NG

explain that everything is fine

Lieutenant Oak, you have been revealed.

[Gray brother]

Quote: Vol4ara

When I read the news about astronautics, a strange smack of shit arises, to

No need to eat shit, you just need to get acquainted with the space program of the Russian Federation - until 2025 there is a restoration of the minimum number of satellite constellations and that’s all.
This is open data.

As for the news, I want to express my opinion - it won’t take off as long as it is possible to use decommissioned ICBMs.

[slipped]

Quote: Gray Brother

will not take off while there is an opportunity to use decommissioned ICBMs.

These are private traders, they are trying to do everything at their own expense. Nobody deducted from ICBMs will trust them.

[Gray brother]

Quote: slipped

Nobody deducted from ICBMs will trust them.

Therefore, they will not be able to compete with them.

[slipped]

Quote: Gray Brother

Therefore, they will not be able to compete with them.

Why so? Will be able It all depends not even on the type of rocket, but on the seller and the range of launch services provided. Our MO is a rather strange seller, a bit of wooden shto le.

[Gray brother]

Quote: slipped

Why so? They can. It all depends not even on the type of rocket, but on the seller and the range of launch services provided.

Escort galleries?

[Gray brother]

Quote: slipped

Our MO is a rather strange seller, a bit of wooden shto le.

The military is out of business, they are launching Khrunicheva and Airbus, it is according to RS-18.
And there is also a topic on "Topols".

[slipped]

Quote: Gray Brother

The military is out of business, they are launching Khrunicheva and Airbus, it is according to RS-18.

Well, you're wrong. As for the RS-18, the "Rokot" rocket is "ruled" by the joint venture "Eurokot", on the Russian side, which includes TsiH (Roscosmos) and our Defense Ministry is mediated. - it delivers for the program expired UR 100, and also provides a launch pad with staff.

Quote: Gray Brother

And there is also a topic on "Topols".

The Start-1 rocket and the launches of this carrier from the Svobodny cosmodrome were ruled by the JSC Launch Services, which has already been disbanded. Since MIT is part of Roskosmos, the latter has plans to restore the launches of this carrier from 2022.

[Gray brother]

Quote: slipped

Well, you are wrong. As for the RS-18, the "Rokot" rocket is "driven" by the joint venture "Eurokot", on the Russian side, which includes TsiH (Roskosmos) and our Defense Ministry is mediated

I quote:
"Commercial launches of the Rokot launch vehicle are carried out by Eurockot Launch Services, a joint venture between Airbus Safran Launchers and the Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center."
https://www.roscosmos.ru/469/
I don’t have it - they sold the rocket already at this stage and they will take money for using the platform, but what they will launch and how much, it doesn’t concern them anymore.

[slipped]

Quote: Gray Brother

I quote:
"Commercial launches of the Rokot launch vehicle are carried out by Eurockot Launch Services, a joint venture between Airbus Safran Launchers and the Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center."
https://www.roscosmos.ru/469/

So everything is right. Who will advertise that NATO countries sponsor our Defense Ministry?

Quote: Gray Brother

I don’t have it - they sold the rocket already at this stage and they will take money for using the site, but what they will launch and how much it will not concern them.

The cost of launching services includes depreciation of the site.

[vadim dok]

I AGREE! Why is all the news in the future! And a comparison with the Electron rocket, which has been flying since 2017 and has 11 launches (deadline 31), and how many will be until 01?

[g1washntwn]

The most important thing now is to prevent Musk or China from "inventing" the innovative nozzle.
The project is both a good word and a wonderful bait. Specialists will confirm that biting is multiplied

[Vyacheslav Viktorovich]

Quote: g1washntwn

The most important thing now is to prevent Musk or China from "inventing" the innovative nozzle.

There are various nozzle designs that have a height-adjustable degree of expansion. Musk (and not only him, but also the same Rocket Lab, which are discussed in the article, and others), of course, studied them. We came to the conclusion that it’s not worth it.

[g1washntwn]

Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich

We came to the conclusion that it’s not worth it.

And what is "that" worth? Sculpt 100500 engines per stage? Somehow I am not attracted to innovation.
Alternatively, a negative result could also happen from the fact that "well, I couldn't ... I couldn't!". Attempts to copy the RD to help.

[Vyacheslav Viktorovich]

Quote: g1washntwn

And what is "that" worth?

The reusable first step was worth it - they did it. Full gasification of the components was worth it - they did it.

Quote: g1washntwn

Somehow it doesn’t attract innovation.

Innovation must be done for the result, not for the fact of innovation.

[g1washntwn]

Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich

Innovation must be done for the result, not for the fact of innovation.

The steps to be returned have been drawn since the word "cosmonautics" appeared. Before Musk, for some reason, they thought that it was just "not worth it", but now, when the nosebleeds have to prove the postulate "America is uberalles", it suddenly became cheaper. I have little faith in such miracles of science and economics. But only time will judge us. By the way, you did not answer what is there with the "primitive Russian RD", innovations do not allow an analogue to be assembled, or just a "machine gun of the wrong system"?

[Vyacheslav Viktorovich]

The SpaceX raptor is a better RD.

The engine on the circuit with full gasification of components (such as Raptor) in the USSR was supposed to be RD-270, but they could not bring it to working capacity.

[vadimtt]

How could it not? They simply turned off the lunar program and did not bother with control schemes.
And the iron of the engine was almost ready for the series.

[Vyacheslav Viktorovich]

"did not bother with control schemes" == "could not bring to work"

[sevryuk]

How is it in Vo-not with polymers?

[ultra]

Quote: Topgun

although the word "project", to be honest, is already starting to get boring.

It's time to rename it to "project". And everything will fall into place.

[bessmertniy]

It is possible that in five years something similar will appear among competitors. And, perhaps, the cost characteristics of launches will change. In this case, it’s too early to talk about our superiority.

[al3x]

* Homeric laughter * In Russia, everything will appear after 25 years, when someone somewhere leaves (but this is not certain) the chair. And all the news of the same type "In Russia after 24-25 ..........".

[BARKAS]

It’s easier, of course, to close all projects until 2025.

[al3x]

For me, Mikhail, it would be better not to issue such announcements at all, but to report on the fact. I’m just tired of the fact that from every corner there are some "designers" sticking out, but most likely loud and unfounded successful top managers of corporations and their henchmen, who have simply filled everyone with their promises. Less words, more actions.

PS And everything is like a carbon copy after 24-25 years. It’s as if something new will appear there as if by magic. This is the strangest thing.

[ultra]

Quote: BARKAS

It’s easier, of course, to close all projects until 2025.

No, no easier, where will the money come from?

[BARKAS]

It’s easier, of course, to close all projects until 2025.

[Vol4ara]

Quote: BARKAS

It’s easier, of course, to close all projects until 2025.

It’s hard to find a cat that isn’t, it’s hard to close a project that isn’t. Promise is easy

[DEDPIHTO]

Quote: Vol4ara

Quote: BARKAS

It’s easier, of course, to close all projects until 2025.

It’s hard to find a cat that isn’t, it’s hard to close a project that isn’t. Promise is easy

Pruvet Squirrel and Strelka!

[al3x]

How many jackalah minuscule then. Disagree with the opinion, but do not want to justify)

[mark1]

Once on a rainy gray day
ran through the posts deer ...

[mark1]

No - it was a band in striped swimsuits ...

[mark1]

... and the first marshal will lead them into battle ...

[svp67]

Lord, how already TIRED, and no one wants to present the results of work on those projects that they promised by 2020? How many "projectors" can be multiplied when the RESULT is shown?

[Nasrat]

Quote: svp67

/// when will the RESULT be shown?

It depends on what result you are waiting for ...

The United States completed 21 launches in 2019. Russia has completed 22 launches from its cosmodromes, and 3 more Soyuz rockets have been sent into space from the Kuru cosmodrome in French Guiana.

Total 25 launches of our launch vehicles.
Musk has more commercial launches. Yes. In terms of the number of launches for commercial customers, SpaceX is indeed ahead of Roscosmos. But, in terms of the number of customers themselves, it is very far behind. Just on July 5, Roskosmos launched the Soyuz 2.1b rocket into space on board which there were 33 devices at once, customers from different countries (including the USA, by the way). One rocket fulfilled contracts with customers from the USA and Germany. Finland, Israel, Czech Republic, Sweden, Estonia, Ecuador, Great Britain, France and Thailand.

In total, Roscosmos fulfilled about 20 contracts of foreign customers, which is about 2 times more than the United States.

[svp67]

Quote: Nasr

Total 25 launches of our launch vehicles.

"Union" is it allied, and where is the "federal" Angara?
Why did they decide not to use the launch on Vostochny, which had been rebuilt for the Soyuz, by loading other cosmodromes with launches, while a full-fledged launch for the Angara was never built? When will Vostochny be launched? Not to mention all sorts of "Yenisei", "Irtysh" and other "Eagles" ...

[Nasrat]

What, to answer you - there really are problems ... and I think about them not only we know ... and hysteria is not worth it, especially when there are launches and customer trust is present .. Why throw hysteria? .. Obviously, financial aspects while they outweigh for launches from the previous places of launch into orbit, while work is being carried out (slowly and with a corruption component, but it is being carried out) and on "spare" sites. So far it has been possible to negotiate with Kazakhstan, but what will happen in the future? For this, the East is also building plans for the Unions and for the Angara ...

[svp67]

Quote: Nasr

Why raise a tantrum? ..

No, you do not correctly understand my REQUEST to report on the RESULTS promised by 2020. Bye request.

[Nasrat]

Quote: svp67

Quote: Nasr

Why raise a tantrum? ..

No, you do not correctly understand my REQUEST to report on the RESULTS promised by 2020. Bye request.

I repeat

It is obvious that the financial aspects are still outweighed by launches from the previous launch sites, while work is being carried out (slowly and with a corruption component, but it is being carried out) also at "spare" sites. So far it has been possible to negotiate with Kazakhstan, but what will happen in the future? For this, the East is also building plans for the Unions and Angara ...
Politics and lack of confidence in the partner pushed for the construction of the East, but it is obvious that it is cheaper from Baikonur, otherwise everything would have been built long ago ...
And you yourself understand, the client is looking for where it is cheaper ... and to explain to the client what is more expensive from the East than from Baikonur - so the client doesn’t care ..

[Nasrat]

Quote: svp67

Quote: Nasr

Why raise a tantrum? ..

No, you do not correctly understand my REQUEST to report on the RESULTS promised by 2020. Bye request.

I will add about the results:

In 2020, Russia is planning more than 40 shipments from Baikonur, Vostochny, Plesetsk and Kuru.

[maidan.izrailovich]

"Union" is it allied, and where is the "federal" Angara?

Just as these announcements got, no less got this stupid division into before and after.
In the Red Army they used three-rulers and no one remembered that they were royal.
All this was created by the Russians. And "Soyuz", and "Angara" ,,,,, and three-line.
Or for you, the Russians who created the "Union" and "Angara" are some different Russians?

[svp67]

Quote: maidan.izrailovich

All this was created by the Russians. And "Soyuz", and "Angara" ,,,,, and three-line.
Or for you, the Russians who created the "Union" and "Angara" are some different Russians?

Quote: maidan.izrailovich

All this was created by the Russians. And "Soyuz", and "Angara" ,,,,, and three-line.
Or for you, the Russians who created the "Union" and "Angara" are some different Russians?

What are you talking about? I am not against the Union, I am for the fact that if people promise something and receive huge budget money for this, then it would not hurt to give an ANSWER. Six years ago they took money not for the Soyuz, but for the Angara and so on, so on ... RESULT where? Show it. That is the question, they promised the result in 2020, is it in the yard, will there be a report? Or you have enough new "promises" of "miracle rockets" in the next six years

[slipped]

Quote: svp67

get huge budget money for it,

The Angara missile is being built with money from the Ministry of Defense. Only at the end of last year, the Ministry of Defense stopped using the Baikonur cosmodrome and the Proton-M rocket for launching their spacecraft. All their new heavy spacecraft fly from Plesetsk to the A5.

A new heavy carrier is being prepared at the factory for shipment to this spaceport:

The "civilian" A5 rocket, according to the federal program, flies in 2023, after the USK "Amur" is built for it as part of the second stage at the "Vostochny".

[slipped]

Quote: svp67

"Union" is it allied, and where is the "federal" Angara?

At the Vostochny cosmodrome, only ONE launch complex is currently operating - for the Soyuz-2 rocket. The Angara universal launch complex is under construction and will be ready by 2023.

Quote: svp67

Why did they decide not to use the launch on Vostochny, which had been rebuilt for the Soyuz, by loading other cosmodromes with launches, while a full-fledged launch for the Angara was never built?

There are five rockets in the Vostochny cosmodrome's MIC today, three of them are already assembled and ready for launch. The launch company at the cosmodrome begins in April, when spacecraft are ready at the customer's site. For more intensive use of the cosmodrome, it is also necessary to build additional facilities for the preparation of spacecraft, for example, to install a large-volume thermo-pressure chamber, the same as at Baikonur, and to finish building complexes of residential buildings for the cosmodrome workers in the city of Tsiolkovsky. The construction of a "full-fledged launch" for the "Angara" LV began last year.

Quote: svp67

When will Vostochny be launched?

The Vostochny cosmodrome began its work in 2016.

[svp67]

Quote: slipped

The Vostochny cosmodrome began its work in 2016.

And you can find out how many missiles from it have already been launched and compare with the same Plesetsk ...

Quote: slipped

There are five rockets in the Vostochny cosmodrome's MIC today, three of them are already assembled and ready for launch. The launch company at the cosmodrome starts in April, when spacecraft are ready at the customer's site.

Well, judging by the statement of Roscosmos, they are going to do the first launch in MAE, and then TWO and everything for a foreign customer ...

[slipped]

Quote: svp67

And you can find out how many missiles from it have already been launched and compare with the same Plesetsk ...

At the moment, from Vostochny, from the C1 launch pad, remote sensing devices weighing up to one and a half tons of VNIIEM corporation are launched into solar-synchronous orbits, since they have a high degree of factory readiness and commercial small spacecraft in cluster launches. This year, cluster launches of OneWeb will begin - 4 launches.

Plesetsk is a military spaceport from which the apparatus of the Ministry of Defense is launched.

Spacecraft launches for the period from April 2016 to 2019:

East: 1 launcher (1 carrier type) - 5 missile launches, 7 spacecraft and 67 small spacecraft successfully launched.
Plesetsk: 3 launchers (2 types of carriers) - 21 missile launches of which 3 commercial spacecraft, other military launches, the number of military spacecraft launched for obvious reasons I will not say.

Quote: svp67

Well, judging by the statement of Roscosmos, they are going to do the first launch in MAE, and then TWO and everything for a foreign customer ...

At the beginning of the year, in 2020, it was planned to launch five Soyuz-2.1b rocket launches from the Vostochny cosmodrome, this is how many missiles were delivered to the cosmodrome - four for OneWeb and one cluster with a federal payload - Meteor-M No. 2-3 + commercial MCA. This month, it was decided to conduct additional tests of the Meteor-M spacecraft No. 2-3 - earlier it was planned to be launched at the end of this year, and accordingly, its launch went to the beginning of 2021. Also, OneWeb announced a reduction in the launches of its spacecraft this year, most likely they cannot cope with their release in the required quantity. Therefore, instead of four launches from Vostochny, they will have only three. The first one is at the beginning of May.



In total, they plan to withdraw 108 spacecraft from Vostochny.

[svp67]

Quote: slipped

4 starts.

But THREE in the East

[slipped]

Quote: svp67

But THREE in the East

So far, three, yes, maybe by the end of the year OneWeb will overfulfill its plan for release the rocket for the fourth launch awaits their satellites in storage. The new ERS satellites, the Luna-25 spacecraft and the rest of the spacecraft launched on Vostochny and Soyuz-2 are still in production.

[Blackmokona]

If you add with Kourou, then add Electrons from New Zealand

[Nasrat]

Quote: BlackMokona

If you add with Kourou, then add Electrons from New Zealand

I don’t own this info, and in general I’m poorly informed about space launches, but the media often slips messages, for example, this month:


MOSCOW, February 7 - RIA Novosti. The communication satellites of the British company OneWeb, launched by the Russian Soyuz-2.1b launch vehicle from the Baikonur cosmodrome, have been launched into orbit, Roscosmos reported.
"Confirmation of successful separation of all 34 OneWeb communication satellites from the Fregat upper stage has been received! They are in target orbits", - said in a post of the state corporation on Twitter.

[Blackmokona]

I'm just about the honesty of the statistics. If you take Unions with Kuru in the Russian pool, then you need to take electrons from New Zealand to the American pool

[Lamata]

Once micro and nanosatellites, the first nanosatellite to launch Chubais.

[Vyacheslav Viktorovich]

creation of a space rocket superior in its parameters to similar developments of competitors

It does not exist yet, but no longer has analogues in the world!

[Vasyan1971]

The device is a reusable ultralight rocket

Type, will come back?

[ultra]

Well, this is a new "trend", don't you know? Efficiency is not important now. Everything is for the sake of fashion.

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: ultra

Efficiency is not important now. Everything is for the sake of fashion.

Yes uzhzh. Fashion is an evil thing.

[Alex 2020]

You are laughing in vain! Will! Such projects have already been developed! Young Tech 1981-05, page 56 and Young Tech 1970-11, page 51

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: Alexey 2020

You are laughing in vain!

And who is laughing? I clarify for myself.
And how does the picture from "Youth Technique" compare as far back as the 70s with current realities? I ask without a "second thought", if what ...

[rocket757]

Ultralight rocket for “budget” launches to appear in Russia

It’s annoying already when they predict, they announce it before something really starts to “be born” ... especially in an industry where a lot of things have been and will still be buried before they become anything.

[askort154]

The device is a reusable ultralight rocket.........
.....Russian developers plan to achieve this result through the use of single-stage media design

Reusable single-stage? !

[mark1]

Project "Crown" as an example. Only she's not ultralight

[v_bueff]

And what is wrong?

[RideMaster]

A reserved seat or something?) I am for. And let the Americans fly on the side near the toilet.)

[ultra]

For me personally, for a long time, such "news" does not cause anything but irritation.

[Lamata]

And they should, according to the Kremlin sitters, cause genuine pride

[donavi49]

Well, if you compete with Beck, then there are three critical vulnerabilities of the project:

1) Wallop site - that is, the main global customer (USA) will now be able to display satellites from its territory. First launch this year.

2) Acceleration block - Photon support platform. 170kg can be thrown to the moon. You can breed cubes into fundamentally different orbits. You can still have a lot of things. Launch in April. This is a unique offer in the light class now.

3) Significant reduction in cost - due to reyuza. Two modified atmospheric entrances have already been completed. There will be another 1 or 2 simulations with extended telemetry. The launch of the rocket refined for the return is optimistic in the fall of 2020, but this is the Rocketlab, they like to move the deadlines. In any case, it will most likely be a No. 2 rocket with a reuse. Beck is waiting up to 5 repeated use booster kit improvements to the first stage.

By the way - while Mask has a confirmed record, there are 4 reuses of one level. The main candidate for the 5th launch - sat by the platform. Wrong positioning information.

[loki565]

Mask also didn’t succeed the first time, and the last step past the platform sat down, only the video didn’t show, like there was only one camera left on the platform))) After all the first failure, all the fans would have buried the project)))

[g1washntwn]

The declared altitude of target destruction at the S-500 is just 200 km. For some reason I remembered ...

[askort154]

g1washntwn The declared altitude of target destruction at the S-500 is just 200 km. For some reason I remembered ...

If you missed, then immediately returned back.

[g1washntwn]

Quote: askort154

If you missed, then immediately returned back.

... had a snack, kimarna and went off once more. In the news, it is reusable.

[v_bueff]

Do not throw words down the drain on the principle "Either the camel dies, or the donkey will speak." Here, praise the Almighty, there are no emergency launches in the foreseeable past.

[Vladimir61]

All this is good, not frozen in one place. The main thing is that the output should be not so much developed, but how many of them will actually fly ...

[ultra]

Federation, Oryol, Phoenix, Irtysh, Rus, Yenisei, Baikal ...... and "Angara" in fact. Who will be responsible for all this dead-born? Considerable funds were allocated for sketch projects and ROC. And the saga with Angara is cherry on the cake.

[ultra]

Something has not been seen for a long time on the site of the "comrade" under the nickname slipped. They fired something from Rosraspilkosmos.

[slipped]

Quote: ultra

Something has not been seen for a long time on the site of the "comrade" under the nickname slipped. They fired something from Rosraspilkosmos.

Do you have gas? indigestion? Then we go to you.

[ultra]

This is all from your boss, Rogozin.

[slipped]

Quote: ultra

This is all from your boss, Rogozin.

And also a head? Clear.

[g1washntwn]

The news turned into a Sabbath of Rogozinophobes and Maskophiles. But the last Falcon9 missed the platform - "well, he didn't fall too much, but soft and close to the water"

[pexotinec]

It feels like the money allocated to the space program does not go to it, but to the top managers. Some projects, but there is no output of finished products. I can’t look at the glossy board of Rogozin without anger, I began to remind Mr. Serdyukov.

[slipped]

Quote: pexotinec

It feels like the money allocated to the space program does not go to it, but to the top managers.

This is a private project from a private company and it has nothing to do with ORKK.

[Warrior MorePhoto]

Who is in the subject?
Micro and nano satellites can be reconnaissance?
Are there any?

[g1washntwn]

Quote: al3x

In Russia, everything will appear after 25 years, when someone leaves where (but not exactly) the chair.

Somewhere it already happened. And yes, for sure: "Assad must leave," "Putin stayed too long," and so on ...

[ultra]

Quote: g1washntwn

... And yes, exactly: "Assad must leave," "Putin stayed too long"

I won’t say anything about Assad, it doesn’t matter to me.

[Grading]

Quote: g1washntwn

The news turned into a Sabbath of Rogozinophobes and Maskophiles. But the last Falcon9 missed the platform - "well, he didn't fall too much, but soft and close to the water"

Starlink-4 mission statistics
4th flight of stage B1056
- 4th launch of 2020 for SpaceX (including IFA)
- 5th mass launch of Starlink satellites
- 25th launch of Falcon 9 Block 5
- 32nd launch with reusable accelerator
- 50th launch of Falcon 9 from the SLC-40 platform
- 56th successful mission in a row
- 66th launch of SpaceX from Cape Canaveral
- 81st launch of Falcon 9
- 89th launch of SpaceX
- 300th SpaceX satellite launched into orbit

- The time record between using the same accelerator is 62 days (was 71 days)
- For the first time, a short output circuit was used for Starlink satellites.

Separately, we note the landing statistics:
- 57th attempt to land the 1st stage (49 of them successfully)
- 37th landing attempt on the platform (31 successful)
- 29th attempt to land on OCISLY (24 successful)

[georggy]

] The device is a reusable ultralight rocket [/ quote]
And the projects were resurrected from Soviet palaces of pioneers - aircraft modeling circles.

[voyaka uh]

The Chinese have copied the Falcon-9 landing system. Test your rocket.
The same must be done by Roscosmos.
The system is simple and reliable.

[slipped]

Quote: voyaka uh

The system is simple and reliable.

Do you also reuse "product number 2"?

for today we have a "simple and reliable system", and the delivery of non-ferrous metal covers all costs

[ultra]

Quote: voyaka uh

The Chinese have copied the Falcon-9 landing system. Test your rocket.
The same must be done by Roscosmos.

Let the Chinese test and let Israel also begin, and the main thing for us is to "throw out" all these "effective" ones from the leadership of the aerospace industry. And to return real engineers and designers to the leadership of the industry.

[Slippery]

Quote: ultra

Something has not been seen for a long time on the site of the "comrade" under the nickname slipped. They fired something from Rosraspilkosmos.

If you're talking about me, don’t you remind me where I drowned for Roskosmos? )))

[ultra]

No, not about you.

[Knell wardenheart]

Russian scientists urgently need to invent a time machine so that we all finally see it not on paper!

[lopuhan2006]

You’re there at least, build something besides the trampoline center, otherwise once every three days the news goes. Or somewhere I didn’t see New Vasyuki in the title of the article?

[Romka]

Yeah, it means that the "reusable rocket" is beneficial, otherwise I already began to "worry" about Musk.

[voyaka uh]

Their last launch, the first stage gently and smoothly landed ... in the water 1-20 meters from the spaceport ship.
Strong side winds over the ocean intervened.
It would be a concrete pavement of an airfield — it would be a village.
But no one was upset: this was the fourth missile flight. She paid for herself with her head.

[slipped]

Testing a prototype of a wide-range engine at Vnkh-Energo LLC

[fa2998]

An Ash for 12 launches pays off! How much did the projects have in 25 years? Energy flew 2 times, Angara also 2. Moreover, we developed a line of rockets, from light to heavy. How much money was thrown away, we don’t have to put into space the task rocket development again.
PS-A astronaut carries an old, royal seven.

[ZVS]

As long as Putin is in power, Russia will never have its own 100% aircraft, let alone missiles. High technology is not available to the Putin regime. His path to copy and upgrade.
Putin created the economy of the world gas station, and high technology is not accessible to his environment.

[ugol2]

Reusable single-stage rocket.
And how does it all from a 200-km altitude return to Earth back?