A batch of Su-25SM3 "Supergrach" attack aircraft equipped with electronic warfare systems "Vitebsk-25" arrived in the Southern Military District


Modernized attack aircraft continue to replenish the air regiments of various military districts of Russia. It became known that the assault aviation SEO replenished with three Super Rooks. So they call the latest modernized version of the Su-25 attack aircraft - Su-25SM3.


The press service of the Southern Military District confirmed the receipt of three deeply modernized attack aircraft Su-25SM3.

Aircraft have already landed at the airfield of the 4th Army Air Force and Air Defense in the territory of Stavropol. The attack aircraft, having left the manufacturer’s airfield, covered a distance of more than 800 km.

The press service of the military district noted that this supply of "Super Rooks" was the fourth for the air units of the South-Eastern Military District.

What was the modernization of aircraft that received the designation Su-25SM3?

These attack aircraft received the Vitebsk-25 electronic warfare system, which makes it possible to counteract various types of air defense systems and air defense systems. Board navigation is carried out using GLONASS with programming the end point of the route with high accuracy. The cabin of the attack aircraft is equipped with a digital display. The electronic-optical guidance system SOLT-25 can significantly increase the shock capabilities of the Superrach. The Su-25SM3 has the ability to conduct air combat, which makes it a truly versatile aircraft.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Victor_B 18 February 2020 07: 32 New
    • 14
    • 2
    +12
    The old man will still serve!
    Still, the Su-25 is a peculiar era of Soviet aviation.
    Front-line aviation has experienced so many "catastrophes" ... God forbid!
    And discussions never stopped - do I need an attack aircraft or not?
    Time changes, MANPADS appeared, which were almost killed by attack aircraft.
    But the Su-25 is more alive than all the living!
    1. aszzz888 18 February 2020 08: 43 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      Victor_B (Victor Petrovich) Today, 07: 32
      +2
      The old man will still serve!
      The old horse will not spoil the furrow! wink
    2. Magic archer 18 February 2020 09: 21 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      And yet this is a swan song of attack aircraft. It’s actually easier to keep drones or kamikaze drones over the battlefield. With all due respect to the Su-25 hi
  2. Range 18 February 2020 07: 34 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    All for the fight against barmaley and helping them of all stripes. The fact that there is protection against all types of MANPADS makes it truly our best attack aircraft. I hope they came up with protection for the rear hemisphere from air-to-air missiles.
    1. RideMaster 18 February 2020 08: 57 New
      • 2
      • 30
      -28
      Truly our best stormtrooper ... fools, when you write a mosk turn it on. It's funny to read.
      1. Ros 56 18 February 2020 09: 38 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        And what is this thing - Mosk, and where to include it, you are our educated.
        1. RideMaster 18 February 2020 12: 00 New
          • 2
          • 10
          -8
          You have proven the level. With sarcasm, you too are so-so.
          Do you read the phrase? Truly our best attack aircraft. To write this you need to be not very smart at all. I’m hinting, I’m talking about our word, given it it turns out to be complete. Naturally, he is the best of ours, guess why.
          1. Tochilka 18 February 2020 12: 56 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Probably because he is the only one specially created as an attack aircraft)))
            1. RideMaster 18 February 2020 17: 33 New
              • 1
              • 4
              -3
              Fools do not think so deeply when they write. Blurred cheers and get off.
          2. Ros 56 18 February 2020 13: 17 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            I understand that you have a problem not only with Muscovite, but also problems with the construction of phrases that express your thoughts.
            Read more classics and don’t watch stupid films, especially striped ones. In a word - learn.
            1. RideMaster 18 February 2020 17: 34 New
              • 0
              • 4
              -4
              That is, the phrase - su25 is one of our best attack aircraft - doesn't it seem silly and funny to you?
              1. Ros 56 18 February 2020 17: 46 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                If you about it

                then the question is not about the quality of Sushki, they are really high-quality machines, but about your spelling. request
                1. RideMaster 18 February 2020 21: 06 New
                  • 1
                  • 4
                  -3
                  The question is that a person with a clever look exclaims that the Su 25 attack aircraft is truly our best attack aircraft.
                  Now, if he wrote - truly the best attack aircraft, I would not have considered him so stupid.
              2. Range 18 February 2020 17: 48 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                And you name the best Russian attack aircraft compared to the Su25CM3. Turn on your Mosk, I compare Russian attack aircraft with each other. And your penguinostan was not even affected.
                1. RideMaster 18 February 2020 21: 01 New
                  • 1
                  • 3
                  -2
                  One of OUR best stormtroopers

                  In general, okay, I have long known about the mental abilities of most of the people here, except how to write something like seven feet under the keel and put a smiley on the hat with a hat, but they can’t do it. If no one sees the stupidity of this phrase, then there is no way to help.
                2. RideMaster 18 February 2020 21: 04 New
                  • 1
                  • 4
                  -3
                  You understand that he cannot but be the best in this comparison. I don’t even know what a similar phrase to use as an example to make you understand.
                3. RideMaster 18 February 2020 21: 18 New
                  • 1
                  • 4
                  -3
                  Formulated for sure. This phrase is simply the apotheosis of lack of information, local morons surpassed everyone in this regard.
                  It is necessary to write about 14 truly our best tank in an article about m 14, to write truly our best fighter in an article about su 57.
  3. Fedorov 18 February 2020 08: 15 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    MANPADS appeared, which almost killed the attack aircraft.

    It's not so simple, you need to learn bullets from it, (I'm talking about Arrow -2 and the Needle), in practice you need 2-3 missiles per plane and with proper use. It’s all simple in films - he threw himself on his shoulder, shot and forgot ... I, as an air defense officer, write.
    1. Victor_B 18 February 2020 08: 45 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Fedorov
      It’s all simple in films - he threw himself on his shoulder, shot and forgot ...

      So I, too, Strela-2 on the shoulder held.
      Of the sights - a black triangle on the pipe and a folding rubber cone seven centimeters long with two markers for the lead (slow target and fast), and a light signal capture.
      Somehow with complexity not very ... (In 1985).
      These (for some reason, in the book "experience of the Israel-Egypt war" they called Cobra-2M) were thrown Israeli planes.
  4. RideMaster 18 February 2020 08: 56 New
    • 3
    • 31
    -28
    These aircraft have already outlived themselves. They do not even drive the broads. So by inertia for some reason they are modernizing, only grandmas spend. One su 35 would have done instead, there was more sense.
  5. Nikolaevich I 18 February 2020 09: 36 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    So is there life on Mars? Oh! Nadot: So, are Russian attack aircraft needed for the Russian Air Force? Well, the very ones .... which are "subsonic, armored ..." and they are often "scolded" ...? There was a time when Su-25 attack aircraft wanted to make tank fighter jets faster than anti-tank helicopters and therefore, capable of replacing helicopters to a large extent with an “anti-tank function”! As it often happens in Russian ... not "grown together"! The idea is good ... the performance is a bit awkward! They say that the PT rocket let us down ... and the other didn’t! Someone is saying that once, Il-102 was to be adopted ... double. With a single Su-25, an error occurred, as with the Ka-50 ...! Someone yells: "Rocket to me! Rocket!" That is, the 3rd generation ... with ANN and GOS! Antirezno, did anyone do an analysis of recent significant military conflicts on the topic: "armored vehicles and aircraft against it"? Was there really so few events to draw some practical conclusions on the available material that answer the question: Are Russian attack aircraft needed for the Russian Air Force? And, if necessary, with a bias in what functionality?
  6. Ros 56 18 February 2020 09: 36 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    This news is good, we are slowly changing the technique to a better one, and I think this is a more correct approach than replacing everything all at once. Not very annoying technical staff for maintenance and repair and not so loaded TEC. Yes, and for manufacturers it is better to have regular orders than six months thickly, and the next six months empty.
    1. Romka47 18 February 2020 10: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Judging by your profile picture, this news cannot but please you) Yes, and I will support you ..
  7. iouris 18 February 2020 11: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    During the development of new combat aircraft systems, their combat effectiveness, as a rule, does not exceed the effectiveness of well-developed ones. Additional combat effectiveness depends on the level of knowledge and skills of command and flight personnel and ITS,
  8. rudolff 18 February 2020 17: 58 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Why is the 25th so ugly painted? Tear out your eye!
  9. TatarinSSSR 18 February 2020 22: 03 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Good news. This old man has been in the air since the 70s, a real workhorse of the front. And a comprehensive modernization has long cried for him with burning tears.